This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3582* 04 13 34.36 +21 01 42.0 7.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8582,7.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3582 7.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3582 2461302.8582 11.49 05:04:17.59 +24:31:58.7
178.51166 -10.11027 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 1 0 1 11.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:04:17.59 +24:31:58.7: 15.16 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:04:17.59 +24:31:58.7: 15.25 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.14
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3582* 05 04 17.59 +24 31 58.7 11.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8582,11.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3582 11.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3582 2461302.8582 12.41 04:52:03.46 +25:40:05.8
175.88874 -11.63561 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -0 -0 0 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:03.46 +25:40:05.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:03.46 +25:40:05.8: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3582* 04 52 03.46 +25 40 05.8 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8582,12.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3582 12.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3582* 04 13 34.36 +21 01 42.0 7.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8582,7.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3582 7.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3582 2461302.8582 13.39 04:05:02.66 +17:55:16.6
174.63365 -24.95386 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato -1 -1 1 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:05:02.66 +17:55:16.6: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:05:02.66 +17:55:16.6: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3582* 04 05 02.66 +17 55 16.6 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8582,13.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3582 13.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3582 2461302.8582 13.44 04:09:14.41 +22:45:28.7
171.53651 -20.92514 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.83 Beatrix -0 0 0 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:09:14.41 +22:45:28.7: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:09:14.41 +22:45:28.7: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3582* 04 09 14.41 +22 45 28.7 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8582,13.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3582 13.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3582 2461302.8582 13.39 04:38:58.87 +23:36:37.0
175.62945 -15.24109 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 3.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" Gaia22ekl
Type: YSO
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.430 G 15.720 G
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata -0 -0 0 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:38:58.87 +23:36:37.0: 16.15 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:38:58.87 +23:36:37.0: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.15 +/- 0.29
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3582* 04 38 58.87 +23 36 37.0 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia22ekl,2461302.8582,13.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia22ekl 20260919.3582 13.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3582 2461302.8582 13.42 05:03:43.54 +22:58:03.7
179.72037 -11.13773 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 3.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula -0 -0 0 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:03:43.54 +22:58:03.7: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:03:43.54 +22:58:03.7: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3582* 05 03 43.54 +22 58 03.7 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8582,13.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3582 13.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3582 2461302.8582 13.66 04:45:27.37 +19:22:28.2
180.05255 -16.69985 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.631 Philippina -0 0 0 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:45:27.37 +19:22:28.2: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:45:27.37 +19:22:28.2: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3582* 04 45 27.37 +19 22 28.2 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8582,13.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3582 13.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3582 2461302.8582 14.14 04:26:11.19 +25:02:16.5
172.53313 -16.53120 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia -0 -0 0 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:26:11.19 +25:02:16.5: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:26:11.19 +25:02:16.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3582* 04 26 11.19 +25 02 16.5 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8582,14.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3582 14.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3582 2461302.8582 14.23 04:12:33.71 +22:41:18.6
172.15243 -20.41578 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.162 Laurentia 2 3 4 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:12:33.71 +22:41:18.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:12:33.71 +22:41:18.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3582* 04 12 33.71 +22 41 18.6 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8582,14.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3582 14.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3582 2461302.8582 14.43 04:21:10.47 +17:40:43.0
177.61090 -22.24112 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1171 Rusthawelia -1 1 1 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:21:10.47 +17:40:43.0: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:21:10.47 +17:40:43.0: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3582* 04 21 10.47 +17 40 43.0 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8582,14.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3582 14.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3582 2461302.8582 14.25 04:50:31.81 +25:16:22.0
175.98978 -12.15088 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.418 Alemannia 0 0 0 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:50:31.81 +25:16:22.0: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:50:31.81 +25:16:22.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3582* 04 50 31.81 +25 16 22.0 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8582,14.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3582 14.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3582 2461302.8582 14.82 04:14:36.58 +22:29:24.0
172.65054 -20.20457 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.341 California -1 -2 2 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:14:36.58 +22:29:24.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:14:36.58 +22:29:24.0: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3582* 04 14 36.58 +22 29 24.0 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8582,14.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3582 14.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3582 2461302.8582 15.06 04:39:16.76 +20:16:06.9
178.37950 -17.29129 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 3.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.311 Claudia 0 -1 1 15.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:16.76 +20:16:06.9: 16.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:16.76 +20:16:06.9: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3582* 04 39 16.76 +20 16 06.9 15.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8582,15.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3582 15.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461302.85848294 19.09.2026 08:36:02.926 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 24
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11568
Objects passed selection criteria: 11564
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11040.5
Average stars matched: 10827.8 (98.073 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236916 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 03:42:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461302.85848294 19.09.2026 08:36:02.926 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 262
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.09
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 78984
Objects passed selection criteria: 78831
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 72489
Average stars matched: 70668.5 (97.4886 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 550592 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 03:44:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.85793282
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:55.582 +22:00:00.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:55.582 +22:00:00.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0066 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.298 +21:59:39.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:56.298 +21:59:39.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0012 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:55.582 +22:00:00.37
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:56.298 +21:59:39.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00638 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i14aZubaNs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IQc4UtsLJQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oHN0yAIeF1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZJqC4KIYtm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.997400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.997400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2796 deg
Loaded 5169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3956 out of 4300 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4300 out of 11076 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 24 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.i14aZubaNs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, bad_region=0, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 10942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=1283 n_q2=1077 n_q3=1448 n_q4=1036 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.IQc4UtsLJQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=897, bad_region=0, passed=11076
Got 11076 stars (including 10166 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1273 n_q2=1107 n_q3=1409 n_q4=1055 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.oHN0yAIeF1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=611, bad_region=1, passed=10716
Got 10716 stars (including 10094 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10716 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5318)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4836 robust_rms=12.810 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.164 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4836 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.420 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4836 robust_rms=0.292 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.344 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4836 robust_rms_before=1.115 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.331 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.292 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.375 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.344
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.375 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=1065 n_q2=1341 n_q3=1102 n_q4=1328 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.191
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZJqC4KIYtm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=593, bad_region=0, passed=10719
Got 10719 stars (including 10116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10719 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4838 stars left (next iteration limit 5322)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4838 robust_rms=12.680 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.047 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4838 robust_rms=0.388 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.425 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4838 robust_rms=0.287 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.337 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4838 robust_rms_before=1.121 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.334 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.287 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.392 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.337
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.345 +21:59:38.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10719 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1172151.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.121 -> 0.287 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4838 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4657 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4657 pairs (4838 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4657 robust_rms=12.613 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.047 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4657 robust_rms=0.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.424 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4657 robust_rms=0.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.329 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4657 robust_rms_before=0.283 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.283 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.332 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.329
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.345 +21:59:38.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10719 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1172765.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.283 -> 0.283 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4657 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4657 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits N_match=4657 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=1030 n_q2=1290 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1278 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.251
ref2=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.351 worst_q_ratio=1.297
new1=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.191
new2=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits sigma_overall=0.302 worst_q_ratio=1.216
reference average sigma_overall=0.3275 worst_q_ratio=1.274
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (4844 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (4844 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_astrometric_residuals.png (4836 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389_astrometric_residuals.png (4657 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:24:24.02 +17:53:04.5: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:44.31 +21:57:43.0: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:04:17.59 +24:31:58.7: 15.16 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:06.52 +21:14:33.1: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:06.90 +21:51:25.6: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:03.46 +25:40:05.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:00.00 +23:58:09.3: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:52.00 +22:50:29.9: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:33.63 +22:12:43.6: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:06.90 +21:51:25.6: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:24:24.02 +17:53:04.5: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:44.31 +21:57:43.0: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:04:17.59 +24:31:58.7: 15.25 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:06.90 +21:51:25.6: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5170 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:24.02 +17:53:04.5: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4742 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:04:17.59 +24:31:58.7: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=11.4894 delta=3.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:44.31 +21:57:43.0: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4258 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:06.52 +21:14:33.1: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:03.46 +25:40:05.8: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:06.52 +21:14:33.1: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4871 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:52.00 +22:50:29.9: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:00.00 +23:58:09.3: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:52.00 +22:50:29.9: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5452 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:33.63 +22:12:43.6: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:00.00 +23:58:09.3: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5205 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:33.63 +22:12:43.6: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4932 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:39.72 +21:26:26.8: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:07.53 +22:37:23.0: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:36:23.45 +22:52:16.7: 12.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:56:35.26 +24:00:33.0: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:15.03 +20:48:47.3: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:26.22 +22:23:30.3: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:03:01.92 +24:47:26.6: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:07.53 +22:37:23.0: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:39.72 +21:26:26.8: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:07.53 +22:37:23.0: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5150 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:39.72 +21:26:26.8: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5534 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:36:23.45 +22:52:16.7: 12.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:23.45 +22:52:16.7: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5572 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:56:35.26 +24:00:33.0: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:35.26 +24:00:33.0: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5011 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:15.03 +20:48:47.3: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:26.22 +22:23:30.3: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:15.03 +20:48:47.3: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5454 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:26.22 +22:23:30.3: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5673 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:03:01.92 +24:47:26.6: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:01.92 +24:47:26.6: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5563 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:10:33.32 +24:48:33.9: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:05:07.22 +26:26:16.7: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:10:33.32 +24:48:33.9: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:05:07.22 +26:26:16.7: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:33.32 +24:48:33.9: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5732 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:07.22 +26:26:16.7: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6126 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20449.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20553.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20366_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20366_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.81 +24:18:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20368_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 20368_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20449_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 20449_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20550_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20550_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20553_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 20553_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:01.03 +21:09:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20558_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20558_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20560_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20560_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:54.16 +22:35:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20564_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20564_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20567_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20567_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20571_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20571_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20576_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20576_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20578_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20578_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20579_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20579_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20583_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20583_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20585_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20585_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20589_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20589_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20591_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20591_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20595_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20595_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20608_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20608_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20624_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20624_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20634_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20634_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.45 +20:15:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 10554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.29 +17:32:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:04:17.59 +24:31:58.7
04:52:03.46 +25:40:05.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:55.582 +22:00:00.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:55.582 +22:00:00.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0066 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.345 +21:59:38.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:56.345 +21:59:38.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0012 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:55.582 +22:00:00.37
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:56.345 +21:59:38.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00670 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8Nh7kgWmTG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rW5hLvsI1U
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vCxS0QTR0D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BSio2SAmFW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.857350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.857350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.09
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.77
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.77
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 80651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec +16.4671 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec 16.4671 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 5197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3489 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 80651 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 238 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8Nh7kgWmTG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=6242, bad_region=8, passed=86318
Got 86318 stars (including 79890 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4857 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4857 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1260 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1439 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.rW5hLvsI1U (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=5759, bad_region=1, passed=80631
Got 80631 stars (including 74709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80631 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1222 n_q2=1136 n_q3=1399 n_q4=1098 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.273
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vCxS0QTR0D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=3422, bad_region=31, passed=62408
Got 62408 stars (including 58874 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62408 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4852 stars left (next iteration limit 5337)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=13.070 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.142 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=0.391 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.424 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=0.287 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.349 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4852 robust_rms_before=1.110 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.331 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.287 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.408 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.349
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 1.110 -> 0.287 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits is a symbolic link
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4852 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4667 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4667 pairs (4852 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4667 robust_rms=13.069 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.016 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4667 robust_rms=0.384 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.411 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4667 robust_rms=0.282 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.333 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4667 robust_rms_before=0.282 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.282 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.282 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.333 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.333
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-quadrant 0.333 vs 0.333 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4667 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4667 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62401 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits N_match=4667 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1053 n_q2=1244 n_q3=1087 n_q4=1283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.BSio2SAmFW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=3361, bad_region=35, passed=62584
Got 62584 stars (including 59090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62584 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4852 stars left (next iteration limit 5336)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=12.876 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.315 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=0.389 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.426 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=0.284 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.344 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4852 robust_rms_before=0.287 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.325 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.284 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.342 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.344
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.342 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits N_match=4852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1084 n_q2=1309 n_q3=1137 n_q4=1322 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033820_TTUQ1b1x1_993463_ovZXzc6L/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:05:39.19 +23:13:26.6: 14.63 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:50.83 +24:37:18.6: 15.33 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:36.83 +23:07:54.1: 14.85 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:56:10.42 +24:40:13.6: 15.17 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:20.15 +23:06:37.4: 14.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:07:23.02 +20:19:41.4: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:14:46.27 +26:19:05.7: 14.81 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:12:03.50 +22:09:54.0: 14.49 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:15.28 +26:34:11.5: 14.32 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:08:23.16 +17:51:50.7: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:20.15 +23:06:37.4: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:36.83 +23:07:54.1: 14.80 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:05:39.19 +23:13:26.6: 14.56 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:50.83 +24:37:18.6: 15.32 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:08:23.16 +17:51:50.7: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:12:03.50 +22:09:54.0: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:56:10.42 +24:40:13.6: 14.85 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:20.15 +23:06:37.4: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5856 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:39.19 +23:13:26.6: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5557 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:50.83 +24:37:18.6: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.2158 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:23.16 +17:51:50.7: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4068 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:36.83 +23:07:54.1: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8237 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:14:46.27 +26:19:05.7: 14.79 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:03.50 +22:09:54.0: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6236 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:15.28 +26:34:11.5: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:10.42 +24:40:13.6: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7960 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:07:23.02 +20:19:41.4: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:46.27 +26:19:05.7: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8053 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:15.28 +26:34:11.5: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4164 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:23.02 +20:19:41.4: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4673 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:16:12.72 +21:20:52.1: 14.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:07.47 +23:57:37.3: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:05:36.05 +24:15:31.8: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:11:49.45 +21:05:58.8: 14.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:06.15 +23:22:08.3: 13.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:09:08.03 +21:52:56.8: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:16:12.72 +21:20:52.1: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:12.72 +21:20:52.1: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0734 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:05:36.05 +24:15:31.8: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:36.05 +24:15:31.8: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0769 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:07.47 +23:57:37.3: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:06.15 +23:22:08.3: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:11:49.45 +21:05:58.8: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:07.47 +23:57:37.3: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3286 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:09:08.03 +21:52:56.8: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:06.15 +23:22:08.3: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1867 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:49.45 +21:05:58.8: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3303 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:08.03 +21:52:56.8: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6300 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:21:45.28 +19:28:44.4: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:10.10 +24:08:07.3: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:21:45.28 +19:28:44.4: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:45.28 +19:28:44.4: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4522 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:05:02.66 +17:55:16.6: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:09:14.41 +22:45:28.7: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:10.10 +24:08:07.3: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:10.10 +24:08:07.3: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0415 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:38:58.87 +23:36:37.0: 16.15 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:38:35.52 +17:25:28.5: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:03:43.54 +22:58:03.7: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:09:14.41 +22:45:28.7: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:05:02.66 +17:55:16.6: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:38:58.87 +23:36:37.0: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.15 +/- 0.29
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:38:58.87 +23:36:37.0: ref_mag=16.15 +/- 0.29 new_mean_mag=13.3907 delta=2.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:38:35.52 +17:25:28.5: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:35.52 +17:25:28.5: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4498 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:03:43.54 +22:58:03.7: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:45:27.37 +19:22:28.2: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:45:27.37 +19:22:28.2: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:03:15.29 +20:54:50.2: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:26:36.01 +17:08:36.1: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:19:45.49 +19:46:24.7: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:03:15.29 +20:54:50.2: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:15.29 +20:54:50.2: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7015 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:26:36.01 +17:08:36.1: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:36.01 +17:08:36.1: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8484 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:19:45.49 +19:46:24.7: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:45.49 +19:46:24.7: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0028 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:08:59.68 +21:40:35.2: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:08:59.68 +21:40:35.2: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:59.68 +21:40:35.2: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1726 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:14:04.61 +18:13:40.1: 14.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:26:11.19 +25:02:16.5: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:27:17.78 +23:02:01.6: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:14:04.61 +18:13:40.1: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:04.61 +18:13:40.1: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1130 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:27:17.78 +23:02:01.6: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:26:11.19 +25:02:16.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:17.78 +23:02:01.6: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2529 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:31.30 +24:17:46.8: 14.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:12:33.71 +22:41:18.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:31.30 +24:17:46.8: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:31.30 +24:17:46.8: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2037 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:32:21.66 +17:17:07.5: 14.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:12:33.71 +22:41:18.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:37.61 +21:31:03.7: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:32:21.66 +17:17:07.5: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:21.66 +17:17:07.5: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1652 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:37.61 +21:31:03.7: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:37.61 +21:31:03.7: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1084 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:59.11 +20:19:31.9: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:26.59 +23:36:24.7: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:59.11 +20:19:31.9: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:59.11 +20:19:31.9: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1426 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:26.59 +23:36:24.7: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:26.59 +23:36:24.7: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4571 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:58.08 +23:28:50.3: 14.44 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:40.81 +26:31:15.7: 14.69 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:58.08 +23:28:50.3: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:58.08 +23:28:50.3: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2416 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:28.53 +23:36:17.7: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:40.81 +26:31:15.7: 14.49 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:40.81 +26:31:15.7: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3901 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:28.53 +23:36:17.7: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:28.53 +23:36:17.7: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3597 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:45.45 +19:20:15.9: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:51.33 +22:09:14.4: 14.67 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:45.45 +19:20:15.9: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:45.45 +19:20:15.9: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2707 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:51.33 +22:09:14.4: 14.67 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:51.33 +22:09:14.4: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4918 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:10.35 +22:14:39.0: 14.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:10.35 +22:14:39.0: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:21:10.47 +17:40:43.0: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:10.35 +22:14:39.0: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4194 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:50:31.81 +25:16:22.0: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:21:10.47 +17:40:43.0: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:50:31.81 +25:16:22.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:14.56 +20:33:16.3: 14.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:06:05.29 +24:32:11.2: 14.68 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:14.56 +20:33:16.3: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:14.56 +20:33:16.3: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3287 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:06:05.29 +24:32:11.2: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:05.29 +24:32:11.2: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5844 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:19:13.86 +23:20:37.3: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:11:02.08 +26:11:38.4: 14.90 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:19:13.86 +23:20:37.3: 14.44 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:13.86 +23:20:37.3: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4877 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:11:02.08 +26:11:38.4: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:55.66 +23:59:04.0: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:02.08 +26:11:38.4: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6415 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:48.30 +19:42:38.3: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:11:50.98 +24:38:38.2: 15.08 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:55.66 +23:59:04.0: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:55.66 +23:59:04.0: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4250 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:05:16.52 +26:49:03.3: 14.82 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:48.30 +19:42:38.3: 14.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:48.30 +19:42:38.3: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4404 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:11:50.98 +24:38:38.2: 14.98 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:50.98 +24:38:38.2: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7350 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:14:36.58 +22:29:24.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:05:16.52 +26:49:03.3: 15.14 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:16.52 +26:49:03.3: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8267 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:17.81 +17:39:39.3: 14.39 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:14:36.58 +22:29:24.0: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:04:59.58 +21:31:19.8: 15.10 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:10:16.55 +26:43:45.6: 15.42 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:17.81 +17:39:39.3: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:17.81 +17:39:39.3: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6693 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:04:26.78 +25:26:58.1: 14.84 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:04:59.58 +21:31:19.8: 15.32 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:59.58 +21:31:19.8: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8269 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:12:59.89 +26:47:14.7: 15.20 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:10:16.55 +26:43:45.6: 15.58 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.48 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:16.55 +26:43:45.6: ref_mag=15.48 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9507 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:08:22.76 +23:18:06.7: 15.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:04:26.78 +25:26:58.1: 14.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:26.78 +25:26:58.1: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9120 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:12:59.89 +26:47:14.7: 15.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:59.89 +26:47:14.7: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9637 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:08:22.76 +23:18:06.7: 14.90 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:22.76 +23:18:06.7: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9203 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:14:59.56 +19:21:14.9: 15.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:14.48 +23:11:34.4: 15.10 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:08:59.35 +24:30:32.8: 15.51 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:16:29.11 +21:54:57.4: 15.51 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:32.05 +25:34:58.0: 15.46 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:04:45.12 +27:04:50.8: 15.53 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:14:59.56 +19:21:14.9: 15.43 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:59.56 +19:21:14.9: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8502 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:04:33.22 +20:10:55.5: 15.14 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:14.48 +23:11:34.4: 15.29 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:14.48 +23:11:34.4: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0148 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:08:59.35 +24:30:32.8: 15.49 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:59.35 +24:30:32.8: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0722 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:16:29.11 +21:54:57.4: 15.67 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.56 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:29.11 +21:54:57.4: ref_mag=15.56 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9844 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:32.05 +25:34:58.0: 15.16 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:04:45.12 +27:04:50.8: 15.22 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:32.05 +25:34:58.0: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0325 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:45.12 +27:04:50.8: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.1829 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:04:33.22 +20:10:55.5: 15.20 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:33.22 +20:10:55.5: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0952 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:14.50 +21:02:24.2: 15.46 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:57.74 +25:11:40.8: 15.92 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:03:47.05 +24:25:33.3: 14.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:12:25.82 +26:08:46.3: 15.42 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:30.51 +20:35:37.4: 15.23 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:14.50 +21:02:24.2: 15.36 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:12:28.71 +18:38:36.5: 15.33 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:14.50 +21:02:24.2: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8769 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:27.20 +22:15:21.7: 15.53 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:57.74 +25:11:40.8: 15.27 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:57.74 +25:11:40.8: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0687 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:15:29.87 +22:47:14.7: 15.16 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:03:47.05 +24:25:33.3: 15.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:47.05 +24:25:33.3: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0084 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:12:25.82 +26:08:46.3: 15.38 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:25.82 +26:08:46.3: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1144 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:30.51 +20:35:37.4: 15.25 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:30.51 +20:35:37.4: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8303 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:06:10.01 +22:45:43.4: 15.43 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:12:28.71 +18:38:36.5: 15.11 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:28.71 +18:38:36.5: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1025 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:27.20 +22:15:21.7: 15.34 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:27.20 +22:15:21.7: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1493 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:15:29.87 +22:47:14.7: 15.29 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:29.87 +22:47:14.7: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1867 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:06:10.01 +22:45:43.4: 15.48 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.45 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:10.01 +22:45:43.4: ref_mag=15.45 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9518 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:19:17.36 +23:40:45.5: 15.79 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:51.98 +27:00:36.9: 15.63 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:13.46 +22:52:34.7: 15.29 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:56.43 +27:13:21.5: 15.54 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:38:00.65 +25:48:10.5: 15.66 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:04:52.76 +22:22:47.7: 15.23 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:12:02.58 +21:25:52.9: 15.62 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:19:17.36 +23:40:45.5: 15.68 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.73 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:17.36 +23:40:45.5: ref_mag=15.73 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=15.1417 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:13.46 +22:52:34.7: 15.16 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:51.98 +27:00:36.9: 15.69 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:13.46 +22:52:34.7: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0628 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.65 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:51.98 +27:00:36.9: ref_mag=15.65 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0392 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:56.43 +27:13:21.5: 15.46 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:38:00.65 +25:48:10.5: 15.38 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:56.43 +27:13:21.5: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1311 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:00.65 +25:48:10.5: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1539 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:04:52.76 +22:22:47.7: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:52.76 +22:22:47.7: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.2156 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:12:02.58 +21:25:52.9: 15.29 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:09:15.30 +21:55:35.3: 15.22 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:02.58 +21:25:52.9: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9783 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:32:13.36 +26:37:35.6: 16.10 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:16.76 +20:16:06.9: 16.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:09:15.30 +21:55:35.3: 15.07 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:15.30 +21:55:35.3: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1415 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:42.45 +22:58:25.3: 15.90 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:32:13.36 +26:37:35.6: 15.81 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:16.76 +20:16:06.9: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.94 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:13.36 +26:37:35.6: ref_mag=15.94 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=15.1853 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:34.10 +19:56:29.8: 14.94 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:42.45 +22:58:25.3: 15.68 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.78 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:42.45 +22:58:25.3: ref_mag=15.78 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.2421 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:34.10 +19:56:29.8: 15.22 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:34.10 +19:56:29.8: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0451 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101661.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101670.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101695.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101747.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101869.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102084.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102130.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102256.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102259.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102494.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102765.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101190_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101190_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101198_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101198_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101200_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101200_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101201_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101201_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101204_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101204_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101207_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101207_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101213_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101213_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101222_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101222_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101224_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101224_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101225_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101225_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101226_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101226_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101228_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101228_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:38.94 +18:06:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101230_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101230_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101235_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101235_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:09.14 +17:33:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101237_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101237_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101239_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101239_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101242_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101242_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101246_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101246_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:31.37 +22:04:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101247_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101247_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101248_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101248_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101249_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101249_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.81 +24:18:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101251_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 101251_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101292_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101292_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101293_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101293_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101294_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101294_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101319_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101319_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.70 +19:10:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101348_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101348_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101386_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101386_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101394_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101394_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101423_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101423_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101425_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101425_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101434_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101434_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:03.46 +25:40:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101435_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101435_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101480_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101480_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101508_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101508_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:29.18 +22:48:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101510_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101510_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101518_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101518_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:47.87 +18:26:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101519_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101519_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101538_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101538_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101539_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101539_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101552_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101552_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:38.42 +22:42:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101556_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101556_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101580_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101580_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101589_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101589_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:57.00 +23:57:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101622_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101622_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:19.40 +24:25:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101624_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101624_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:24.64 +22:56:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101629_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101629_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:45.28 +19:58:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101655_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101655_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101661_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 101661_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101670_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 101670_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101687_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101687_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101695_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 101695_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101700_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101700_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101736_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101736_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:24.34 +18:37:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101742_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101742_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101747_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 101747_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101751_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101751_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:30.07 +21:45:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101759_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101759_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:07.92 +21:31:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101765_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101765_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:14.42 +24:06:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101772_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101772_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:52.85 +23:55:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101806_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101806_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101822_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101822_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101830_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101830_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101833_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101833_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101836_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101836_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101845_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101845_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:08.45 +20:28:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101854_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101854_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:25.52 +18:42:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101860_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101860_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101869_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 101869_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101871_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101871_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101873_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101873_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101887_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101887_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101917_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101917_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101918_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101918_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:47.30 +22:58:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101921_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101921_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101923_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101923_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:58.61 +24:19:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101929_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101929_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101938_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101938_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101943_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101943_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101946_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101946_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101953_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101953_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101956_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101956_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101967_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101967_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.42 +24:25:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101970_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101970_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101975_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101975_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:35.66 +23:40:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101980_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101980_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101983_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101983_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:17.76 +23:59:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101984_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101984_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101985_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101985_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:13.25 +19:56:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101993_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101993_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101997_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101997_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102003_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102003_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:11.91 +18:28:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102005_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102005_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102009_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102009_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102010_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102010_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102043_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102043_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:57.99 +21:03:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102053_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102053_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102056_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102056_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102058_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102058_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:03.69 +20:29:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102061_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102061_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:02.07 +24:08:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102066_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102066_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102071_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102071_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102082_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102082_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102084_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 102084_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102100_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102100_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102101_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102101_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:10.81 +23:53:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102108_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102108_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102109_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102109_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102110_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102110_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102116_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102116_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102129_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102129_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102130_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 102130_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102132_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102132_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102135_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102135_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102138_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102138_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:40.60 +21:44:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102140_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102140_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102151_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102151_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102153_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102153_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102160_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102160_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:56.99 +19:31:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102175_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102175_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102183_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102183_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102185_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102185_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102194_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102194_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102196_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102196_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102209_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102209_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102212_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102212_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:28.67 +20:33:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102220_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102220_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102224_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102224_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:53.28 +24:49:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102229_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102229_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102233_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102233_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102237_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102237_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102239_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102239_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102250_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102250_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102253_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102253_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102255_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102255_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102256_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 102256_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102259_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 102259_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102262_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102262_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:44.83 +24:28:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102265_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102265_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:50.64 +23:37:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102273_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102273_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102276_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102276_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102278_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102278_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102299_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102299_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102306_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102306_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102317_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102317_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102328_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102328_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102335_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102335_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102336_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102336_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102341_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102341_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102344_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102344_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102354_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102354_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102360_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102360_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102365_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102365_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102374_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102374_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102377_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102377_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:38.81 +23:58:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102397_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102397_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102398_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102398_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102399_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102399_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102404_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102404_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102408_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102408_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102409_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102409_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102410_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102410_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102445_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102445_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:49.14 +22:53:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102483_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102483_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102485_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102485_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102494_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 102494_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102498_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102498_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102501_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102501_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102512_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102512_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102516_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102516_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102519_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102519_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102522_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102522_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102537_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102537_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102543_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102543_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102551_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102551_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102553_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102553_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102555_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102555_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102564_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102564_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102575_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102575_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102590_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102590_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102595_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102595_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102601_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102601_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102602_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102602_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102615_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102615_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102617_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102617_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102619_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102619_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102624_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102624_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102625_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102625_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102626_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102626_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102638_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102638_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102640_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102640_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102645_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102645_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102649_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102649_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102658_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102658_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102667_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102667_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102675_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102675_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102678_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102678_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102679_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102679_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102682_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102682_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102688_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102688_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102689_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102689_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102692_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102692_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102695_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102695_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102702_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102702_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102704_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102704_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102709_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102709_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102714_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102714_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102719_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102719_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102724_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102724_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102735_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102735_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102736_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102736_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102741_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102741_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102742_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102742_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102744_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102744_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102746_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102746_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102747_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102747_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102751_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102751_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102755_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102755_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102761_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102761_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102765_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 102765_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102772_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102772_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102775_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102775_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102782_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102782_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102804_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102804_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102823_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102823_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102839_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102839_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102843_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102843_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102846_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102846_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102848_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102848_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102859_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102859_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102869_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102869_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102902_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102902_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53022_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53022_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:39.84 +20:57:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80576_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 80576_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.54 +18:37:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.46 +20:15:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65103_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 65103_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.29 +17:32:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17784_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 17784_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
