This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.2674 2461302.7674 8.71 00:28:02.22 +08:21:54.2
113.03943 -54.05661 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.192 Nausikaa 0 1 1 8.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:28:02.22 +08:21:54.2: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:28:02.22 +08:21:54.2: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.7674,8.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.2674 8.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.2674 2461302.7674 13.42 00:26:44.72 +08:05:39.6
112.42688 -54.27300 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.577 Rhea -0 -0 0 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:26:44.72 +08:05:39.6: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:26:44.72 +08:05:39.6: 15.22 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.22
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.7674,13.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.2674 13.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.2674 2461302.7674 13.38 00:13:23.41 +01:23:41.2
103.61279 -60.04210 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.551 Ortrud 0 0 0 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:13:23.41 +01:23:41.2: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:13:23.41 +01:23:41.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.7674,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.2674 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.2674 2461302.7674 13.69 00:08:34.04 +10:51:45.9
106.20507 -50.61144 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.701 Oriola -0 1 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:08:34.04 +10:51:45.9: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:08:34.04 +10:51:45.9: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.7674,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.2674 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.2674 2461302.7674 13.87 23:29:32.89 +05:55:54.6
88.98918 -51.46142 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1353 Maartje -0 -0 0 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:29:32.89 +05:55:54.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:29:32.89 +05:55:54.6: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.7674,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.2674 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.2674 2461302.7674 14.18 23:31:28.01 +09:32:30.1
92.33101 -48.52083 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1151 Ithaka -0 -0 0 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:31:28.01 +09:32:30.1: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:31:28.01 +09:32:30.1: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.7674,14.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.2674 14.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.2674 2461302.7674 14.27 23:48:51.81 +08:58:03.7
97.97990 -50.84742 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1756 Giacobini 0 -0 0 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:48:51.81 +08:58:03.7: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:48:51.81 +08:58:03.7: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.7674,14.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.2674 14.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90183583 21.07.2026 09:38:28.616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
First image: 2461242.90183583 21.07.2026 09:38:28.616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Last image: 2461302.76770203 19.09.2026 06:25:19.455 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.44
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6810
Objects passed selection criteria: 6809
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6572.5
Average stars matched: 6220.25 (94.6405 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233496 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 01:28:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90183583 21.07.2026 09:38:28.616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
First image: 2461242.90183583 21.07.2026 09:38:28.616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Last image: 2461302.76770203 19.09.2026 06:25:19.455 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 95
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 35976
Objects passed selection criteria: 35894
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 34847
Average stars matched: 32867.5 (94.3195 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 262116 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 01:29:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.76709367
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:42.982 +06:04:12.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82
Second-epoch image center 23:59:42.982 +06:04:12.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0989 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:43.093 +06:04:46.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82
Second-epoch image center 23:59:43.093 +06:04:46.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1059 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:42.982 +06:04:12.86
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:43.093 +06:04:46.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00923 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zia32wCfzF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pdPCDvv3N8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9K5KeqkFr5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.831JW3ywGB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 6233 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.0271 to 7.9045 deg, Dec +0.6902 to +11.2647 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.0271 to 7.9045 deg, Dec 0.6902 to 11.2647 deg
Loaded 4566 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3722 out of 3826 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3826 out of 6233 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.662650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.662650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.44
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 6233 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.0271 to 7.9045 deg, Dec +0.6902 to +11.2647 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.0271 to 7.9045 deg, Dec 0.6902 to 11.2647 deg
Loaded 4566 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3722 out of 3826 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3826 out of 6233 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (aperture=6.4)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 6318 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.8996 to 8.2591 deg, Dec +0.3478 to +11.6137 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.8996 to 8.2591 deg, Dec 0.3478 to 11.6137 deg
Loaded 4984 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3763 out of 3845 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3845 out of 6318 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
2.4 pix Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
2.4 pix fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
2.4 pix fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
15.2 mag. Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.zia32wCfzF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, bad_region=0, passed=6233
Got 6233 stars (including 5867 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6233 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0271 through 0 to 7.9045, gap 7.9045 to 352.0271
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0274 through 0 to 7.9045, gap 7.9045 to 352.0274
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1279 n_q2=1239 n_q3=1222 n_q4=1157 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits -region wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pdPCDvv3N8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=328, bad_region=0, passed=6318
Got 6318 stars (including 5982 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8996 through 0 to 8.2591, gap 8.2591 to 351.8996
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8998 through 0 to 8.2592, gap 8.2592 to 351.8998
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=1292 n_q2=1193 n_q3=1278 n_q4=1129 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -region wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9K5KeqkFr5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=423, bad_region=0, passed=6959
Got 6959 stars (including 6531 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6959 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8295 through 0 to 8.1778, gap 8.1778 to 351.8295
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8294 through 0 to 8.1783, gap 8.1783 to 351.8294
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5381)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=11.033 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.704 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.397 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.423 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.276 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.288 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4893 robust_rms_before=1.040 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.283 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.276 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.292 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.288
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.292 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1301 n_q2=1192 n_q3=1279 n_q4=1121 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.026
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.831JW3ywGB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=410, bad_region=0, passed=6947
Got 6947 stars (including 6529 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6947 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8294 through 0 to 8.1779, gap 8.1779 to 351.8294
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8293 through 0 to 8.1784, gap 8.1784 to 351.8293
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5380)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=11.062 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.674 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=0.398 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.415 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=0.280 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.291 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4891 robust_rms_before=1.042 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.287 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.280 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.298 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.291
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.298 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1305 n_q2=1193 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.042
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.120
ref2=Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits sigma_overall=0.303 worst_q_ratio=1.077
new1=fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits sigma_overall=0.298 worst_q_ratio=1.026
new2=fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits sigma_overall=0.300 worst_q_ratio=1.042
reference average sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.0985
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966_astrometric_residuals.png (4897 matched stars from wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267_astrometric_residuals.png (4891 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:03:30.73 +04:49:47.4: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:56:45.71 +05:39:18.6: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:28:02.22 +08:21:54.2: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:01:01.32 +05:11:53.0: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:28:02.22 +08:21:54.2: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:01:01.32 +05:11:53.0: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:56:45.71 +05:39:18.6: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:03:30.73 +04:49:47.4: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:01:01.32 +05:11:53.0: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2462 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:45.71 +05:39:18.6: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2503 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:03:30.73 +04:49:47.4: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1943 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20598.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20598_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 20598_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20605_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 20605_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:36:10.42 +09:48:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20633_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 20633_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20636_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 20636_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20638_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 20638_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:28:02.22 +08:21:54.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:42.982 +06:04:12.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82
Second-epoch image center 23:59:42.982 +06:04:12.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0989 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:43.093 +06:04:46.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82
Second-epoch image center 23:59:43.093 +06:04:46.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1059 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:42.982 +06:04:12.86
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:43.093 +06:04:46.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00923 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3I5b62C5Wd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Voie2luPiV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JBgj7bON4a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VZIia5x7iN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 33634 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9992 to 7.9160 deg, Dec +0.6902 to +11.2656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9992 to 7.9160 deg, Dec 0.6902 to 11.2656 deg
Loaded 4573 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3677 out of 3960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3960 out of 33634 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.546200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.546200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 33634 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9992 to 7.9160 deg, Dec +0.6902 to +11.2656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9992 to 7.9160 deg, Dec 0.6902 to 11.2656 deg
Loaded 4573 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3677 out of 3960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3960 out of 33634 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (aperture=5.0)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 33762 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.8996 to 8.2739 deg, Dec +0.3067 to +11.6461 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.8996 to 8.2739 deg, Dec 0.3067 to 11.6461 deg
Loaded 5018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3715 out of 3975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3975 out of 33762 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 78 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
2.4 pix Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
2.3 pix fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
2.3 pix fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
15.3 mag. Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3I5b62C5Wd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1340, bad_region=0, passed=33612
Got 33612 stars (including 32227 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33612 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9992 through 0 to 7.9160, gap 7.9160 to 351.9992
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9998 through 0 to 7.9160, gap 7.9160 to 351.9998
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=1276 n_q2=1249 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits -region wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Voie2luPiV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1193, bad_region=21, passed=33746
Got 33746 stars (including 32487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33746 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8996 through 0 to 8.2739, gap 8.2739 to 351.8996
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8999 through 0 to 8.2739, gap 8.2739 to 351.8999
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=1273 n_q2=1211 n_q3=1272 n_q4=1129 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.059
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -region wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JBgj7bON4a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1418, bad_region=31, passed=36544
Got 36544 stars (including 35047 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36544 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8013 through 0 to 8.1778, gap 8.1778 to 351.8013
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8010 through 0 to 8.1783, gap 8.1783 to 351.8010
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=11.143 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.716 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.417 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.270 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.280 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4889 robust_rms_before=1.024 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.273 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.270 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.287 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.280
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.287 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=1291 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1279 n_q4=1120 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.032
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VZIia5x7iN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1397, bad_region=29, passed=36426
Got 36426 stars (including 34943 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36426 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8013 through 0 to 8.1779, gap 8.1779 to 351.8013
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8010 through 0 to 8.1784, gap 8.1784 to 351.8010
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=11.354 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.599 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.396 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.410 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.272 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.284 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4889 robust_rms_before=1.020 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.278 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.272 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.286 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.284
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.286 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=1297 n_q2=1207 n_q3=1268 n_q4=1117 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.040
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-24-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_012559_TTUQ1b1x1_1086522_rsI9w8sU/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:35:33.16 +03:40:00.2: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:22:46.20 +06:14:14.3: 14.60 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:45:09.77 +09:11:56.5: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:27:49.78 +01:43:14.6: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:34:14.42 +07:17:27.2: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:26:44.72 +08:05:39.6: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:15:41.45 +08:25:40.9: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:25:32.38 +01:11:20.8: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:35:33.16 +03:40:00.2: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:15:41.45 +08:25:40.9: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:26:44.72 +08:05:39.6: 15.22 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:45:09.77 +09:11:56.5: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:34:14.42 +07:17:27.2: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:22:46.20 +06:14:14.3: 14.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:41.45 +08:25:40.9: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8042 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:33.16 +03:40:00.2: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6019 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:14.42 +07:17:27.2: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6558 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:46.20 +06:14:14.3: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7957 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:45:09.77 +09:11:56.5: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5892 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:26:44.72 +08:05:39.6: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=13.4059 delta=1.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:27:49.78 +01:43:14.6: 14.18 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:51:50.34 +07:26:41.4: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:49.78 +01:43:14.6: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2387 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:25:32.38 +01:11:20.8: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:32.38 +01:11:20.8: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6406 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:51:50.34 +07:26:41.4: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:13:23.41 +01:23:41.2: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:50.34 +07:26:41.4: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4200 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:13:23.41 +01:23:41.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:31:28.01 +09:32:30.1: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:08:34.04 +10:51:45.9: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:48:51.81 +08:58:03.7: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:30:13.38 +10:48:28.9: 15.02 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:31:23.79 +08:27:57.2: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:31:01.14 +09:49:22.0: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:29:32.89 +05:55:54.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:31:28.01 +09:32:30.1: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:08:34.04 +10:51:45.9: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:48:51.81 +08:58:03.7: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:31:23.79 +08:27:57.2: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:23.79 +08:27:57.2: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2221 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:31:01.14 +09:49:22.0: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:01.14 +09:49:22.0: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4131 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:30:13.38 +10:48:28.9: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:13.38 +10:48:28.9: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4545 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:55:15.35 +02:26:10.4: 14.29 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:29:32.89 +05:55:54.6: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:55:15.35 +02:26:10.4: 14.34 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:15.35 +02:26:10.4: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3832 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:29:06.16 +04:02:28.8: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:29:17.93 +01:43:23.2: 14.86 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:30:53.01 +09:44:06.4: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:29:06.16 +04:02:28.8: 15.14 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:06.16 +04:02:28.8: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5705 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:29:17.93 +01:43:23.2: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:17.93 +01:43:23.2: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5907 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:32:38.59 +03:56:29.0: 14.56 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:30:53.01 +09:44:06.4: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:53.01 +09:44:06.4: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6022 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:32:38.59 +03:56:29.0: 14.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:38.59 +03:56:29.0: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5624 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:30:22.36 +07:32:37.7: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:46:32.69 +08:18:11.2: 14.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:29:54.71 +08:57:56.5: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:30:22.36 +07:32:37.7: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:22.36 +07:32:37.7: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5061 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:46:32.69 +08:18:11.2: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:46:32.69 +08:18:11.2: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6719 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:29:54.71 +08:57:56.5: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:54.71 +08:57:56.5: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6775 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:26:36.79 +05:58:21.8: 14.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:26:36.79 +05:58:21.8: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:36.79 +05:58:21.8: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5870 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:30:01.97 +10:26:51.4: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:51:50.87 +03:04:55.7: 14.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:38:03.63 +10:17:30.8: 14.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:30:01.97 +10:26:51.4: 14.96 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:01.97 +10:26:51.4: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7513 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:38:03.63 +10:17:30.8: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:03.63 +10:17:30.8: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6150 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:51:50.87 +03:04:55.7: 14.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:50.87 +03:04:55.7: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6795 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:32:24.77 +02:10:39.4: 14.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:32:24.77 +02:10:39.4: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:24.77 +02:10:39.4: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6615 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:21:00.26 +00:50:51.3: 14.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:35:30.48 +04:43:08.5: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:32:06.05 +01:44:07.6: 14.93 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:21:00.26 +00:50:51.3: 14.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:00.26 +00:50:51.3: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5399 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:35:30.48 +04:43:08.5: 15.12 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:30.48 +04:43:08.5: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7301 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:32:06.05 +01:44:07.6: 14.79 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:06.05 +01:44:07.6: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6749 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:52:52.44 +10:04:13.8: 14.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:36:08.20 +09:25:56.5: 14.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:52:52.44 +10:04:13.8: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:52.44 +10:04:13.8: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6736 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:33:54.45 +08:57:02.4: 14.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:29:40.05 +09:17:06.1: 14.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:36:08.20 +09:25:56.5: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:08.20 +09:25:56.5: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5426 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:33:54.45 +08:57:02.4: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:54.45 +08:57:02.4: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7919 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:29:40.05 +09:17:06.1: 14.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:40.05 +09:17:06.1: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7637 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:30:36.34 +10:13:36.1: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:26:33.12 +01:14:05.3: 15.04 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:30:36.34 +10:13:36.1: 14.92 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:36.34 +10:13:36.1: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5806 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:29:58.08 +10:08:25.8: 15.13 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:32:47.91 +08:44:38.6: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:26:33.12 +01:14:05.3: 14.85 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:33.12 +01:14:05.3: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6323 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:29:58.08 +10:08:25.8: 14.82 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:58.08 +10:08:25.8: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8123 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:29:27.88 +10:06:23.1: 15.01 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:32:47.91 +08:44:38.6: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:47.91 +08:44:38.6: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7196 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:03:05.29 +10:23:12.2: 14.61 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:29:27.88 +10:06:23.1: 14.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:27.88 +10:06:23.1: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6959 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:29:45.80 +02:31:59.3: 14.97 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:03:05.29 +10:23:12.2: 14.64 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:31:54.30 +05:11:44.5: 15.59 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:03:05.29 +10:23:12.2: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7035 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:30:16.51 +03:16:19.8: 14.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:29:45.80 +02:31:59.3: 14.84 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:45.80 +02:31:59.3: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6681 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:31:54.30 +05:11:44.5: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:54.30 +05:11:44.5: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8452 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:28:16.68 +07:42:21.7: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:43:30.34 +07:26:35.2: 14.56 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:30:16.51 +03:16:19.8: 14.47 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:16.51 +03:16:19.8: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6240 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:30:17.42 +01:28:21.0: 14.91 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:28:16.68 +07:42:21.7: 15.09 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:16.68 +07:42:21.7: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5678 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:10:20.34 +01:03:25.3: 14.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:43:30.34 +07:26:35.2: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:30.34 +07:26:35.2: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6993 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:23:47.67 +01:26:46.7: 15.29 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:30:17.42 +01:28:21.0: 14.91 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:17.42 +01:28:21.0: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5844 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:22:27.43 +01:51:04.6: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:25:25.46 +02:32:15.3: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:37:59.07 +04:23:48.3: 15.19 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:10:20.34 +01:03:25.3: 15.20 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:10:20.34 +01:03:25.3: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6581 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:23:47.67 +01:26:46.7: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:27:22.93 +03:33:16.4: 15.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:47.67 +01:26:46.7: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6960 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:22:27.43 +01:51:04.6: 15.30 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:37:59.07 +04:23:48.3: 15.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:27.43 +01:51:04.6: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7565 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:25:25.46 +02:32:15.3: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:28:29.57 +01:15:54.7: 14.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:59.07 +04:23:48.3: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8063 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:25.46 +02:32:15.3: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7236 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:20:46.95 +00:48:06.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:06:45.41 +10:05:11.3: 14.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:27:22.93 +03:33:16.4: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:22.93 +03:33:16.4: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6969 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:28:07.25 +02:34:53.7: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:28:29.57 +01:15:54.7: 14.98 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:29.57 +01:15:54.7: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6507 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:20:46.95 +00:48:06.1: 15.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:20:46.95 +00:48:06.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:28:48.38 +08:53:57.2: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:06:45.41 +10:05:11.3: 14.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:45.41 +10:05:11.3: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7197 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:28:30.15 +01:17:33.0: 15.13 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:18:43.61 +01:01:23.0: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:28:07.25 +02:34:53.7: 15.39 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:28:23.68 +05:10:45.9: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:07.25 +02:34:53.7: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6638 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:30:01.05 +03:42:11.7: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:28:48.38 +08:53:57.2: 15.02 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:48.38 +08:53:57.2: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7768 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:31:15.68 +09:39:28.8: 14.85 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:28:30.15 +01:17:33.0: 14.87 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:30.15 +01:17:33.0: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6779 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:18:43.61 +01:01:23.0: 15.30 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:43.61 +01:01:23.0: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7409 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:28:22.88 +06:27:32.2: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:28:23.68 +05:10:45.9: 15.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:30:01.05 +03:42:11.7: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:23.68 +05:10:45.9: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6747 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:01.05 +03:42:11.7: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6067 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:26:26.30 +02:17:13.5: 15.18 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:12:34.53 +01:00:41.4: 15.39 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:31:15.68 +09:39:28.8: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:15.68 +09:39:28.8: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7373 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:30:06.59 +04:38:05.4: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:28:22.88 +06:27:32.2: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:22.88 +06:27:32.2: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7307 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:26:26.30 +02:17:13.5: 15.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:26.30 +02:17:13.5: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8262 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:23:07.04 +01:51:52.7: 14.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:12:34.53 +01:00:41.4: 15.27 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:12:34.53 +01:00:41.4: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8384 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:29:22.47 +05:13:09.9: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:22:11.75 +02:20:28.1: 15.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:26:49.84 +01:26:48.0: 15.29 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:30:06.59 +04:38:05.4: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:06.59 +04:38:05.4: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9644 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:23:07.04 +01:51:52.7: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:07.04 +01:51:52.7: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6752 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:29:22.47 +05:13:09.9: 15.02 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:22.47 +05:13:09.9: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7943 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:22:11.75 +02:20:28.1: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:26:49.84 +01:26:48.0: 15.33 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:11.75 +02:20:28.1: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7476 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:49.84 +01:26:48.0: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.7900 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53750.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53861.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53881.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53894.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53941.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53946.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53724_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 53724_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53733_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 53733_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53734_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 53734_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53739_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 53739_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:25:00.49 +05:59:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53742_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 53742_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53747_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 53747_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53748_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 53748_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53749_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 53749_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53750_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 53750_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53755_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 53755_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:28:02.22 +08:21:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53859_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 53859_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53861_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 53861_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53881_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 53881_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53894_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 53894_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53941_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 53941_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53946_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
Preparing report for the candidate 53946_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53950_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 53950_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53964_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 53964_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53976_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 53976_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53987_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 53987_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53991_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 53991_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53995_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 53995_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:27:58.51 +02:30:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53996_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 53996_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54012_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54012_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54013_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54013_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54016_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54016_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54026_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54026_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54033_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54033_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54036_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54036_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54044_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54044_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54045_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54045_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54047_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54047_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54048_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54048_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54050_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54050_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54052_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54052_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54056_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54056_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54061_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54061_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54064_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54064_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54067_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54067_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54072_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54072_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54073_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54073_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54078_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54078_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54083_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54083_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54085_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54085_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54088_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54088_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54090_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54090_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54091_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54091_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54092_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54092_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54096_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54096_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54098_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54098_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54099_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54099_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54104_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54104_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54112_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54112_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54114_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54114_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54115_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54115_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54116_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54116_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54118_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54118_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54143_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54143_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54144_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54144_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54146_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54146_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54150_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54150_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54154_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54154_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54161_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54161_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54164_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54164_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54173_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54173_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54185_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54185_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54192_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54192_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54200_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54200_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54205_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54205_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54223_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54223_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54237_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54237_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54239_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54239_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54241_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54241_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54251_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54251_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54265_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54265_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54291_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 54291_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23891_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 23891_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:54:22.23 +07:22:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26495_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 26495_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-25-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
