NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-05-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.25623    2461302.75623    11.33    23:56:03.66 -07:35:25.4   4204 4651   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    11.35    23:56:03.58 -07:35:25.2   4199 4655   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 19.2566  2461302.7566  11.34  23:56:03.62 -07:35:25.3
 86.49649 -66.46154 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.9 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
106 Dione                    0      0       0  11.4     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:03.62 -07:35:25.3:  15.34 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:03.62 -07:35:25.3:  15.41 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.25623    2461302.75623    11.81    23:43:05.62 -13:48:01.2   2285 0878   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    11.86    23:43:05.63 -13:48:00.5   2281 0883   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 19.2566  2461302.7566  11.84  23:43:05.63 -13:48:00.9
 69.41261 -69.21528 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
118 Peitho                  -1     -1       1  11.9     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:05.63 -13:48:00.9:  15.16 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:05.63 -13:48:00.9:  15.18 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.25623    2461302.75623    13.42    00:06:41.20 -11:04:48.3   5777 2533   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    13.41    00:06:41.22 -11:04:48.3   5773 2538   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 19.2566  2461302.7566  13.41  00:06:41.21 -11:04:48.3
 87.53305 -70.80971 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1133 Lugduna                 -0      0       0  13.4    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:06:41.21 -11:04:48.3:  15.46 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:06:41.21 -11:04:48.3:  15.51 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 3

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 319929 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 319929 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits

renamed 'Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 765.4159 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.5498 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1394.3938 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 519.9069 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1392.9231 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 520.3793 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.82175 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 25.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-19T01:08:48.4319880' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-19T06:08:48.4319880' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61302.2561160997 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-19T06:08:58.3365204' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61302.2562307408 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.999852009318 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99948045423156 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 44.9702777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 163.370555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.41355597176351 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20453 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20453 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 54.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 17.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 9.00072 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits :) Spent 0.634943 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 25.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-19T01:09:53.7239191' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-19T06:09:53.7239191' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61302.2568717939 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-19T06:10:03.6287142' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61302.256986435 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.999851967105 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99948045957743 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 45.0352777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 163.743611111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.41195919967195 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20453 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20453 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 54.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 17.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 9.00072 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits :) Spent 0.625846 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.75623184 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Image size: 932.8'x622.4' 15.5(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.84"/pix along the X axis and 5.85"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.762 -09:59:25.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.762 -09:59:25.84 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0113 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:02.196 -10:00:11.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:02.196 -10:00:11.95 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0074 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.762 -09:59:25.84 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:02.196 -10:00:11.95 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01409 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EWxshLGk52 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.riZMKUjdXC Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xa8iMeOfAE Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UQ1Ut9b49d Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.590100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.590100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.4) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.6 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 2.3 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.8 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 14.9 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.EWxshLGk52 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=897, passed=4374 Got 4374 stars (including 3271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3184 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3182 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9539 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3184 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 3182 stars left (next iteration limit 3500) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3182 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=1080 n_q2=583 n_q3=999 n_q4=520 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.riZMKUjdXC (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=887, passed=4358 Got 4358 stars (including 3264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3177 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9539 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 3177 stars left (next iteration limit 3494) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3177 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=1022 n_q2=571 n_q3=1079 n_q4=505 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.xa8iMeOfAE (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=321, bad_region=1036, passed=4922 Got 4922 stars (including 3627 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4922 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 932.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 932.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012956 (46.6 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010364 (37.3 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0071 through 0 to 8.0599, gap 8.0599 to 352.0071 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 374 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1794 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1601 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1576 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.74" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1566 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2645 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.43" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0017 through 0 to 8.0618, gap 8.0618 to 352.0017 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2086 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1983 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2691 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.86" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2981 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.94" Excluding outliers - 1977 stars left (next iteration limit 1722) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1977 robust_rms=3.333 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.049 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1977 robust_rms=0.522 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.618 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1977 robust_rms=0.362 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.532 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1977 robust_rms_before=31.411 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=3.116 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.362 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=17.048 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.532 verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Image size: 936.6'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.336 -09:59:43.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 4922 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky850242.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 31.411 -> 0.362 arcsec) SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 1977 pairs from the initial matching) UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9615 through 0 to 8.0795, gap 8.0795 to 351.9615 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2466 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success SIP_REFIT: re-match found 2466 pairs (1977 from the initial matching) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2466 robust_rms=4.744 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.359 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2466 robust_rms=0.482 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.624 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2466 robust_rms=0.353 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.381 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2466 robust_rms_before=0.429 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.429 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.353 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=1.300 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.381 verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.340 -09:59:43.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 4922 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky880995.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.429 -> 0.353 arcsec) Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2466 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3230 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2466 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3293 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits N_match=2466 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=375 n_q2=438 n_q3=1114 n_q4=539 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.UQ1Ut9b49d (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=340, bad_region=1028, passed=4889 Got 4889 stars (including 3595 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4889 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9541 through 0 to 8.0770, gap 8.0770 to 351.9541 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3497 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3496 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3496 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3496 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4045 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9541 through 0 to 8.0772, gap 8.0772 to 351.9541 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3498 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3496 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4045 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3496 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4045 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 3496 stars left (next iteration limit 3845) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3496 robust_rms=6.850 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.649 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3496 robust_rms=0.464 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.617 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3496 robust_rms=0.346 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.397 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3496 robust_rms_before=1.095 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.346 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.377 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.397 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.377 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits N_match=3496 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=1147 n_q2=650 n_q3=1146 n_q4=553 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.158 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.357 worst_q_ratio=1.090 ref2=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.120 new1=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.096 new2=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits sigma_overall=0.346 worst_q_ratio=1.158 reference average sigma_overall=0.3165 worst_q_ratio=1.105 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q1: 375 -> 1147, 67.306% > 20%; fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits vs fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits) - possible passing clouds or a bad plate solution; continuing processing ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 438 -> 650, 32.615% > 20%; fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits vs fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits) - possible passing clouds or a bad plate solution; continuing processing
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3182 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3177 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286_astrometric_residuals.png (2466 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287_astrometric_residuals.png (3496 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:35:51.31 -13:47:08.1: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:03.62 -07:35:25.3: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:05.63 -13:48:00.9: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:03.62 -07:35:25.3: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:05.63 -13:48:00.9: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:35:51.31 -13:47:08.1: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.35 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:51.31 -13:47:08.1: ref_mag=11.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7853 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20195.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20197.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20192_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 20192_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.25623    2461302.75623    11.82    23:35:51.26 -13:47:08.4   1208 0866   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    11.76    23:35:51.37 -13:47:07.8   1204 0871   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20195_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 Preparing report for the candidate 20195_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20197_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 Preparing report for the candidate 20197_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 03145_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 03145_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    10.75    00:13:45.93 -07:48:35.1   6854 4505   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits **** FOUND 00:13:45.93 -07:48:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 23:56:03.62 -07:35:25.3 23:43:05.63 -13:48:00.9 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.340 -09:59:43.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.340 -09:59:43.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0064 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:02.196 -10:00:11.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:02.196 -10:00:11.95 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0074 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.340 -09:59:43.31 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:02.196 -10:00:11.95 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01101 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dq6tzUZGDS Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b2yL96lgW5 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lndk6h8osu Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BugAu2bsQu Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.414650 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.414650 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.5) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 2.2 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.9 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 15.0 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.dq6tzUZGDS (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=913, bad_region=4921, passed=22724 Got 22724 stars (including 17090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22724 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4836 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0984, gap 8.0984 to 351.9463 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5319) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1598 n_q2=928 n_q3=1483 n_q4=827 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.b2yL96lgW5 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=4531, passed=23408 Got 23408 stars (including 18214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9465 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4838 stars left (next iteration limit 5321) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4838 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=1569 n_q2=893 n_q3=1543 n_q4=833 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Lndk6h8osu (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=926, bad_region=4462, passed=26241 Got 26241 stars (including 21048 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26241 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9440 through 0 to 8.0925, gap 8.0925 to 351.9440 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22848 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9464 through 0 to 8.0926, gap 8.0926 to 351.9464 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22848 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22848 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4838 stars left (next iteration limit 5321) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4838 robust_rms=6.717 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.740 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4838 robust_rms=0.448 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.615 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4838 robust_rms=0.341 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.390 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4838 robust_rms_before=0.407 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.337 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.341 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.361 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.390 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.361 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits N_match=4838 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=1575 n_q2=867 n_q3=1569 n_q4=827 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.BugAu2bsQu (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=940, bad_region=4506, passed=26351 Got 26351 stars (including 21091 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26351 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9467 through 0 to 8.0891, gap 8.0891 to 351.9467 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4839 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22923 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9467 through 0 to 8.0893, gap 8.0893 to 351.9467 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22923 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22923 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4839 stars left (next iteration limit 5322) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4839 robust_rms=6.774 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.741 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4839 robust_rms=0.472 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.628 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4839 robust_rms=0.354 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.402 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4839 robust_rms_before=1.080 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.346 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.354 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.381 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.402 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.381 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits N_match=4839 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=1574 n_q2=858 n_q3=1578 n_q4=829 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:06.66 -07:36:47.9: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:06:27.18 -13:24:56.9: 13.83 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:48.91 -06:31:07.7: 13.28 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:45:52.00 -10:20:18.4: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:10.22 -12:23:26.0: 13.83 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:06:41.21 -11:04:48.3: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:09.59 -08:03:52.8: 13.81 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:42:24.60 -06:00:21.5: 13.46 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:18.81 -09:31:10.4: 13.82 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:37:57.86 -14:09:53.9: 14.24 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:09.59 -08:03:52.8: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:06:27.18 -13:24:56.9: 14.23 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:48.91 -06:31:07.7: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:42:24.60 -06:00:21.5: 13.74 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:10.22 -12:23:26.0: 14.01 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:06.66 -07:36:47.9: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:45:52.00 -10:20:18.4: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:06:41.21 -11:04:48.3: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:09.59 -08:03:52.8: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2716 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:27.18 -13:24:56.9: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1709 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:48.91 -06:31:07.7: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4918 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:06.66 -07:36:47.9: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1969 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:42:24.60 -06:00:21.5: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3036 delta=-0.73 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:10.22 -12:23:26.0: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0239 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:45:52.00 -10:20:18.4: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0415 delta=-0.79 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:18.81 -09:31:10.4: 13.77 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:37:57.86 -14:09:53.9: 14.39 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:18.81 -09:31:10.4: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0113 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:57.86 -14:09:53.9: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1845 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:35.61 -10:30:37.5: 14.45 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:47.26 -09:01:10.7: 13.63 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:37:31.93 -10:47:03.8: 14.65 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:21.05 -08:00:47.9: 14.38 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:40:15.18 -13:20:39.1: 15.13 +/- 0.31 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:59.37 -08:18:32.4: 14.50 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:35.61 -10:30:37.5: 14.21 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:47.26 -09:01:10.7: 13.82 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:21.05 -08:00:47.9: 14.27 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:35.61 -10:30:37.5: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2746 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:37:31.93 -10:47:03.8: 14.61 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:40:15.18 -13:20:39.1: 14.62 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:59.37 -08:18:32.4: 14.40 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:47.26 -09:01:10.7: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2337 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:21.05 -08:00:47.9: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4098 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:31.93 -10:47:03.8: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2926 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:15.18 -13:20:39.1: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3469 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:59.37 -08:18:32.4: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2996 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32190.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32148_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 32148_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.25623    2461302.75623    14.17    00:06:26.97 -13:24:54.9   5730 1119   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    14.17    00:06:27.40 -13:24:58.8   5727 1123   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32149_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 32149_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.25623    2461302.75623    14.23    23:56:09.57 -08:03:52.1   4218 4364   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    14.33    23:56:09.61 -08:03:53.4   4214 4368   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32150_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 32150_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.25623    2461302.75623    14.30    23:42:24.54 -06:00:22.0   2141 5613   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    14.31    23:42:24.66 -06:00:21.0   2136 5618   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32154_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 32154_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.25623    2461302.75623    12.96    23:45:51.98 -10:20:18.8   2684 2985   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    13.14    23:45:52.02 -10:20:18.0   2679 2990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32162_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 32162_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    11.39    23:56:03.59 -07:35:25.3   4199 4655   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits **** FOUND 23:56:03.60 -07:35:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32164_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 32164_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    11.80    23:43:05.63 -13:48:00.5   2281 0883   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits **** FOUND 23:43:05.66 -13:48:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32180_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 32180_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.25623    2461302.75623    13.20    23:48:06.66 -07:36:47.9   3010 4637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    13.19    23:48:06.66 -07:36:47.9   3006 4642   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32190_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 Preparing report for the candidate 32190_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32191_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 32191_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.25623    2461302.75623    13.54    23:52:48.92 -06:31:07.6   3716 5301   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    13.45    23:52:48.90 -06:31:07.8   3711 5306   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32207_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 32207_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.25623    2461302.75623    13.99    23:33:10.24 -12:23:25.9   0794 1710   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    14.06    23:33:10.20 -12:23:26.2   0789 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32208_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 32208_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.25623    2461302.75623    14.02    23:56:18.80 -09:31:11.8   4240 3484   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    14.01    23:56:18.81 -09:31:09.1   4236 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32217_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 32217_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.25623    2461302.75623    14.10    23:37:57.93 -14:09:53.3   1525 0641   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    14.32    23:37:57.79 -14:09:54.5   1520 0646   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32222_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 32222_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.25623    2461302.75623    14.28    23:33:35.57 -10:30:37.5   0841 2858   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    14.27    23:33:35.64 -10:30:37.4   0836 2863   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32223_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 32223_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.25623    2461302.75623    14.32    23:33:21.15 -08:00:47.2   0779 4380   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    14.55    23:33:20.94 -08:00:48.5   0774 4384   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32225_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 32225_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.25623    2461302.75623    14.28    23:43:59.39 -08:18:32.8   2393 4213   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    14.32    23:43:59.34 -08:18:32.0   2388 4217   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32228_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 32228_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.25623    2461302.75623    14.25    23:37:31.88 -10:47:03.9   1437 2701   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    14.35    23:37:31.99 -10:47:03.7   1433 2706   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32241_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 32241_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.25623    2461302.75623    14.24    00:00:47.30 -09:01:10.8   4908 3784   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    14.23    00:00:47.22 -09:01:10.7   4903 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32267_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 32267_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.25623    2461302.75623    14.33    23:40:15.14 -13:20:38.5   1861 1149   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    14.37    23:40:15.22 -13:20:39.7   1856 1154   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21120_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 The candidate 21120_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 19.25699    2461302.75699    10.74    00:13:45.93 -07:48:34.9   6854 4505   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_011937_TTUQ2b1x1_464116_gSOVySRP/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits **** FOUND 00:13:45.93 -07:48:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 23:56:03.62 -07:35:25.3 23:43:05.63 -13:48:00.9 00:06:41.21 -11:04:48.3 ########### Completed Cet-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 23:56:03.62 -07:35:25.3 23:43:05.63 -13:48:00.9 00:06:41.21 -11:04:48.3 ################################################################################### 23:56:03.62 -07:35:25.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 23:43:05.63 -13:48:00.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:06:41.21 -11:04:48.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461302.75623184 -observatory V36 12:49:05.85 -05:34:13.6 Mercury (-0.3mag) 14:01:23.92 -18:29:12.1 Venus (-4.8mag) 07:45:35.67 +22:03:06.3 Mars (1.2mag) 09:18:36.52 +16:16:21.9 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:48:43.81 +02:17:51.6 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:34.84 +21:01:44.1 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:12:34.48 -00:11:04.2 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:52.38 -23:41:53.8 Pluto (14.5mag) 17:57:42.24 -28:25:59.2 Moon (-10.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 19 01:23 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461302.75623184: 09:18:43.51 +16:15:46.8 Io (6.0mag) 09:18:34.30 +16:16:33.5 Europa (6.2mag) 09:18:45.16 +16:15:39.1 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:18:34.59 +16:16:31.7 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:16:53.81 +16:37:03.9 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:18:36.84 +16:16:20.8 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:16:19.83 +16:31:24.9 Elara (17.7mag) 09:22:08.63 +15:40:55.9 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:18:49.31 +16:37:27.8 Carme (18.9mag) 00:48:55.44 +02:17:43.5 Titan (8.3mag) 00:48:44.29 +02:17:53.4 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:48:24.93 +02:18:29.1 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:48:27.61 +02:17:49.6 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:47:18.95 +02:06:36.1 Phoebe (16.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 19 01:23 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461302.75623184: 23:46:54.08 +12:30:12.0 JWST 13:07:22.54 +53:15:06.9 Chandra 10:44:17.52 -58:28:48.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 19 01:23 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461302.75623184 -observatory V36 03:45:51.86 +19:48:27.5 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:08:24.88 -33:58:48.0 14.5mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:27:56.40 -70:59:39.9 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:37.77 +34:01:11.5 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:03:53.40 +46:59:11.2 16.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:04:25.81 +27:07:04.2 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:18:37.43 +25:45:52.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 11:00:25.59 +26:49:56.3 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:56:05.41 +05:09:55.9 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:26.24 -16:41:34.1 15.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:48:10.78 +33:41:56.4 16.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:08:37.95 +15:11:48.9 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:27:52.94 +42:38:07.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:10:58.57 +48:27:57.5 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:41:08.72 -13:13:03.5 15.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:14:48.83 +16:04:35.4 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:37:43.88 +17:48:59.3 16.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:29:53.49 -00:51:52.6 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:17:26.90 +71:47:27.9 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:58:05.17 +45:34:19.7 17.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:24:28.85 +12:15:51.7 17.6mag A/2026 E1 22:36:14.22 -35:02:31.4 13.7mag 10P/Tempel 01:38:05.65 +39:00:01.6 17.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 11:56:14.52 -06:23:10.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:32:38.64 -08:49:33.8 17.8mag 63P/Wild 07:01:26.25 +18:14:43.4 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:15:32.85 +15:00:42.6 16.8mag 88P/Howell 06:19:04.40 +33:04:30.3 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:06:07.47 +21:29:18.1 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:54:14.66 +18:16:20.7 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:13:29.78 -25:23:56.8 17.6mag 124P/Mrkos 06:31:03.53 +20:13:37.5 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 01:24:18.97 -14:47:21.6 14.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:33:57.49 +07:57:44.8 12.6mag 169P/NEAT 03:31:39.55 +07:19:13.4 14.6mag 220P/McNaught 05:18:50.80 +39:49:30.1 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 09:02:53.55 +34:18:55.0 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:33:35.81 -01:34:31.5 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:37:53.86 +16:14:49.1 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 19 01:23 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 19 01:23 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 19 01:23 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 14:45:20.862 -05:19:19.97 AT 2026aacc 2026-08-23.15 19.4444 15:56:38.169 +18:42:01.63 SN 2026aacb 2026-08-29.18 19.5538 20:55:37.041 -01:27:15.88 AT 2026aaca 2026-08-30.60 19.51 14:43:57.052 -18:28:53.81 SN 2026aabz 2026-08-30.23 18.705 13:37:12.730 -32:27:40.17 AT 2026aaby 2026-08-30.72 18.545 06:50:17.864 +20:05:46.74 AT 2026aabx 2026-08-30.61 17.869 05:36:22.321 -31:19:59.16 AT 2026aabw 2026-08-30.79 18.65 17:26:25.715 +35:28:47.48 AT 2026aabv 2026-08-30.35 18.678 03:41:51.198 -40:54:09.63 AT 2026aabu 2026-08-22.78 20.13 15:50:13.320 -33:32:57.31 AT 2026aabt 2026-08-29.37 19.72 01:18:28.460 -27:05:47.26 SN 2026aabs 2026-08-27.78 19.28 22:23:15.798 -29:48:02.93 AT 2026aabr 2026-08-30.57 19.11 23:23:45.523 -29:23:36.22 SN 2026aabq 2026-08-23.58 19.7 22:48:33.213 -45:12:00.11 AT 2026aabp 2026-08-30.61 18.75 00:44:54.260 +41:33:10.49 AT 2026aabo 2026-08-29.40 18.5784 01:36:46.683 +30:41:53.77 AT 2026aabn 2026-08-28.69 20.82 01:39:53.640 +34:03:40.40 AT 2026aabm 2026-08-26.73 20.83 00:25:36.720 +41:26:16.16 AT 2026aabl 2026-08-26.72 20.57 00:06:22.110 +41:47:11.52 AT 2026aabk 2026-08-23.72 21.3 16:34:18.591 +32:50:04.19 AT 2026aabj 2026-08-23.59 21.08 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 19 01:23 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 93 C