This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.2447 2461302.7447 12.37 04:51:57.41 +25:39:52.7
175.87739 -11.65575 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales 1 0 1 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:51:57.41 +25:39:52.7: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:51:57.41 +25:39:52.7: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.2447* 04 51 57.41 +25 39 52.7 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.7447,12.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.2447 12.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.2447 2461302.7447 12.20 05:27:24.97 +29:34:16.7
177.32823 -3.00574 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.63 Ausonia -0 0 0 12.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:27:24.97 +29:34:16.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:27:24.97 +29:34:16.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.7447,12.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.2447 12.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.2447 2461302.7447 13.57 04:34:26.29 +27:54:56.1
171.55429 -13.24566 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana -0 1 1 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:34:26.29 +27:54:56.1: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:34:26.29 +27:54:56.1: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.2447* 04 34 26.29 +27 54 56.1 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.7447,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.2447 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.2447 2461302.7447 14.07 05:00:22.98 +34:46:30.4
169.75119 -4.61509 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.852 Wladilena -2 0 2 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:00:22.98 +34:46:30.4: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:00:22.98 +34:46:30.4: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.7447,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.2447 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.2447 2461302.7447 13.41 05:23:08.82 +32:28:25.6
174.40818 -2.13903 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J0523087+322827
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.282 R1 Y 0.969 R1 413.000000000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:23:08.82 +32:28:25.6: 14.63 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:23:08.82 +32:28:25.6: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0523087+322827,2461302.7447,13.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0523087+322827 20260919.2447 13.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.2447 2461302.7447 13.22 05:31:17.69 +32:11:03.0
175.60707 -0.87015 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V0730 Aur
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.350 R1 12.750 R1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:31:17.69 +32:11:03.0: 14.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:31:17.69 +32:11:03.0: 14.52 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0730 Aur,2461302.7447,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0730 Aur 20260919.2447 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461302.74510727 19.09.2026 05:52:47.268 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15280
Objects passed selection criteria: 15220
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12061
Average stars matched: 11737.5 (97.3178 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 245856 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 00:57:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461302.74510727 19.09.2026 05:52:47.268 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 110
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 33 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 117074
Objects passed selection criteria: 116851
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 89203.8
Average stars matched: 85866.2 (96.2586 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 512960 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 00:59:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.74432553
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:56.767 +30:05:31.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:56.767 +30:05:31.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0988 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 944.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:54.410 +30:04:52.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:54.410 +30:04:52.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0900 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:56.767 +30:05:31.16
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:54.410 +30:04:52.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01379 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LtEwWwZiAA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KwdxlfqWVr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits &> /tmp/tmp.weBqQtiUZZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Thn8mIqNHb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2864 deg
Loaded 8429 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6042 out of 6743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6743 out of 16349 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
3.2 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
3.3 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.LtEwWwZiAA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=0, passed=16295
Got 16295 stars (including 14768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KwdxlfqWVr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=0, passed=16349
Got 16349 stars (including 14839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5281)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.weBqQtiUZZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=322, bad_region=0, passed=7925
Got 7925 stars (including 7593 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7925 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4773 stars left (next iteration limit 5249)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=8.326 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.293 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.552 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.907 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.452 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.544 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4773 robust_rms_before=1.701 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.465 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.452 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.605 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.544
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.8' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:56.889 +30:05:29.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7925 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1276861.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.701 -> 0.452 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4773 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4559 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4559 pairs (4773 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4559 robust_rms=8.050 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.162 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4559 robust_rms=0.558 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.971 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4559 robust_rms=0.442 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.533 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4559 robust_rms_before=0.443 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.443 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.442 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.532 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.533
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-quadrant 0.533 vs 0.532 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4559 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4559 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits N_match=4559 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=726 n_q2=806 n_q3=1144 n_q4=1883 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Thn8mIqNHb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=329, bad_region=0, passed=7997
Got 7997 stars (including 7661 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4776 stars left (next iteration limit 5251)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4776 robust_rms=8.461 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.704 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4776 robust_rms=0.553 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.807 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4776 robust_rms=0.470 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.573 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4776 robust_rms_before=1.601 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.461 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.470 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.576 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.573
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.576 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=4776 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.490 n_q1=763 n_q2=871 n_q3=1163 n_q4=1979 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.114
ref2=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new1=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits sigma_overall=0.444 worst_q_ratio=1.224
new2=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.461 worst_q_ratio=1.227
reference average sigma_overall=0.37 worst_q_ratio=1.1215
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (4801 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (4800 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238_astrometric_residuals.png (4559 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (4776 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21118_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 21118_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:55.62 +30:10:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21129_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 21129_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:11.38 +35:13:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21161_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 21161_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.28 +32:10:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21182_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 21182_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:11.23 +31:27:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21221_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 21221_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.51 +28:42:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13740_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 13740_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:16.54 +27:22:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 00487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.42 +35:03:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 15527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.43 +26:08:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.42 +34:08:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:21.63 +30:42:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09574_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 09574_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:49.93 +30:05:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 11604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:17.42 +28:36:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.8' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:56.889 +30:05:29.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:56.889 +30:05:29.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0983 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 944.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:54.410 +30:04:52.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:54.410 +30:04:52.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0900 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:56.889 +30:05:29.54
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:54.410 +30:04:52.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01372 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rzRVuhD5ds
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PNlftGxQ4j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4g0Vw8hB3M
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZRpe0XLEVM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.2955 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.2955 deg
Loaded 8479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4936 out of 6881 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6881 out of 129055 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 104 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
3.0 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
3.0 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.7 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.rzRVuhD5ds (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14027, bad_region=9, passed=128967
Got 128967 stars (including 114713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128967 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1871 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1152 n_q4=731 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.PNlftGxQ4j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=13827, bad_region=12, passed=129020
Got 129020 stars (including 114961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1874 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1148 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4g0Vw8hB3M (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2532, bad_region=13, passed=50471
Got 50471 stars (including 47854 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50471 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4776 stars left (next iteration limit 5256)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4776 robust_rms=8.529 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.747 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4776 robust_rms=0.543 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.897 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4776 robust_rms=0.445 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.530 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4776 robust_rms_before=0.446 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.447 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.445 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.532 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.530
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.532 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits N_match=4776 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.480 n_q1=783 n_q2=848 n_q3=1209 n_q4=1936 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZRpe0XLEVM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2568, bad_region=17, passed=50830
Got 50830 stars (including 48186 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50830 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50830 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50830 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50830 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4780 stars left (next iteration limit 5254)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=8.784 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.248 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=0.560 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.839 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=0.467 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.573 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4780 robust_rms_before=1.586 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.454 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.467 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.578 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.573
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.578 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=4780 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.496 n_q1=790 n_q2=850 n_q3=1202 n_q4=1938 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-51-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_005328_TTUQ1b1x1_1097003_5IkqrkG2/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:33:17.90 +25:52:23.9: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:25:13.83 +31:25:02.8: 13.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:58:49.51 +24:59:23.3: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:33:17.90 +25:52:23.9: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:25:13.83 +31:25:02.8: 13.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:51:57.41 +25:39:52.7: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:58:49.51 +24:59:23.3: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:17.90 +25:52:23.9: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3883 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:13.83 +31:25:02.8: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4635 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:58:49.51 +24:59:23.3: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6732 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:27:24.97 +29:34:16.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:51:57.41 +25:39:52.7: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:27:24.97 +29:34:16.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:34:26.29 +27:54:56.1: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:00:22.98 +34:46:30.4: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:50.11 +29:58:34.6: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:34:26.29 +27:54:56.1: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:50.11 +29:58:34.6: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:00:22.98 +34:46:30.4: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:50.11 +29:58:34.6: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3923 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:23:08.82 +32:28:25.6: 14.63 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:23:08.82 +32:28:25.6: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:23:08.82 +32:28:25.6: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4136 delta=1.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:31:17.69 +32:11:03.0: 14.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:31:17.69 +32:11:03.0: 14.52 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:31:17.69 +32:11:03.0: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.2273 delta=1.26 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151413.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151436.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151768.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out152053.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out37569.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out39496.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151105_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151105_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151107_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151107_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151111_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151111_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:45.80 +32:23:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151122_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151122_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:36.97 +33:23:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151127_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151127_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151129_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151129_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:30.10 +30:16:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151131_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151131_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:43.26 +33:27:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151145_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151145_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:11.38 +35:13:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:11.24 +31:27:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151262_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151262_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:57.85 +33:05:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151292_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151292_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.47 +34:26:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151306_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151306_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.84 +34:09:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151350_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151350_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151357_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151357_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:56.88 +33:06:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151376_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151376_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:25.49 +34:49:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151387_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151387_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:29.79 +32:42:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151390_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151390_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:36.03 +34:06:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151394_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151394_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:25.09 +30:30:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151413_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 151413_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151421_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151421_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.89 +26:55:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151427_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151427_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.65 +34:23:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151430_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151430_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:22.10 +28:31:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151433_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151433_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:32.97 +28:37:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151436_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 151436_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151459_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151459_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:35.55 +34:07:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151464_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151464_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.66 +32:33:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151474_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151474_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:46.52 +31:23:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151494_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151494_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.71 +26:10:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151524_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151524_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:46.04 +26:25:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.52 +33:11:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151561_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151561_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:55.01 +32:26:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151587_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151587_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:56.23 +33:34:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151600_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151600_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.95 +29:47:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151630_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151630_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:26.41 +34:06:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151644_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151644_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.71 +33:12:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151645_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151645_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:10.24 +34:24:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151652_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151652_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.29 +31:44:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151662_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151662_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.74 +29:45:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151689_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151689_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:36.61 +30:33:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151708_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151708_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:28.08 +30:16:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151743_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151743_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:35.87 +31:24:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151762_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151762_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.95 +33:11:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151768_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 151768_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151796_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151796_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:52.95 +32:19:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151812_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151812_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151816_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151816_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:12.23 +33:29:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151831_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151831_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151881_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 151881_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:27.69 +34:00:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152053_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 152053_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.30 +32:10:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.52 +31:18:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101891_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 101891_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:24.05 +26:11:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54729_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 54729_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:02.06 +31:29:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95878_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 95878_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:44.12 +24:57:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:50.97 +26:46:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:21.13 +30:48:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:47.48 +26:45:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 141164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:25.94 +29:15:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 140767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:55.64 +30:10:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 140722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:53.00 +30:33:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140605_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 140605_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:05.38 +34:13:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103686_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 103686_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:41.68 +26:45:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 113941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:57.77 +27:26:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:09.03 +25:22:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 123731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:50.72 +28:10:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:49.35 +25:24:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:38.55 +28:39:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96598_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 96598_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:04.15 +25:01:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103574_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 103574_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.51 +26:23:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 104960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:45.63 +26:37:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48877_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 48877_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:38.13 +31:55:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37569_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 37569_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.52 +28:42:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:11.39 +33:50:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:53.67 +27:26:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 88379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:39.32 +29:06:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:12.23 +25:58:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39496_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
Preparing report for the candidate 39496_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.43 +35:03:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 89704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:35.81 +29:00:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.43 +26:08:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:49.91 +30:05:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:16.51 +27:22:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 41372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:11.44 +32:26:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:26.36 +31:29:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77691_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 77691_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:23.11 +29:29:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58936_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 58936_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:59.24 +31:03:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:08.21 +27:03:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113860_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 113860_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:04.95 +27:11:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111199_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 111199_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:32.09 +25:38:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107352_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 107352_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:15.19 +26:43:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:49.57 +34:37:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 69229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:42.62 +30:32:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:50.39 +29:42:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 128113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:57.46 +28:30:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18012_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 18012_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.84 +33:44:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116992_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 116992_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:42.92 +27:43:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.45 +34:08:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:21.61 +30:42:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:19.95 +34:08:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 33758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:52.79 +32:28:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 97203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:16.46 +25:08:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:17.40 +28:36:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239
The candidate 37087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_00-52-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0239 did not pass the final checks
