This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.1430 2461302.6430 12.59 19:27:58.49 -37:31:01.9
1.18283 -22.93932 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.455 Bruchsalia -0 -2 2 12.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:27:58.49 -37:31:01.9: 14.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:27:58.49 -37:31:01.9: 14.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.6430,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.1430 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.1430 2461302.6430 13.01 19:35:49.59 -32:29:54.3
6.90491 -22.92113 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.139 Juewa 1 -2 2 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:35:49.59 -32:29:54.3: 14.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:35:49.59 -32:29:54.3: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.6430,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.1430 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.1430 2461302.6430 12.51 19:45:44.58 -31:12:36.6
8.96212 -24.51684 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V5574 Sgr
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.524 V 13.749 V 2452028.61000 0.554836200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:45:44.58 -31:12:36.6: 13.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:45:44.58 -31:12:36.6: 13.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V5574 Sgr,2461302.6430,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V5574 Sgr 20260919.1430 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461228.76784715 07.07.2026 06:25:31.994 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461228.76784715 07.07.2026 06:25:31.994 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461302.64327807 19.09.2026 03:26:09.225 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5621
Objects passed selection criteria: 5608
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4234
Average stars matched: 3615.75 (85.398 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231516 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 23:44:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461228.76784715 07.07.2026 06:25:31.994 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461228.76784715 07.07.2026 06:25:31.994 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461302.64327807 19.09.2026 03:26:09.225 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 129
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 45007
Objects passed selection criteria: 44924
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 36294.5
Average stars matched: 32367 (89.1788 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 262200 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 23:45:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.64268634
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 937.5'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:25.124 -34:01:06.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
Image size: 936.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:33.243 -34:00:31.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:25.124 -34:01:06.26
Second-epoch image center 19:49:33.243 -34:00:31.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0297 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
Image size: 936.8'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:32.459 -33:59:51.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:25.124 -34:01:06.26
Second-epoch image center 19:49:32.459 -33:59:51.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0327 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:49:33.243 -34:00:31.29
Second-epoch second image center 19:49:32.459 -33:59:51.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01136 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XKPiNFHuHb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TlyIafgTKX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sAPJQ8eJLl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PiNO5rkdzd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4697 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4882 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2783 to -28.5409 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4882 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2783 to -28.5409 deg
Loaded 9498 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3848 out of 3914 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3914 out of 4697 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.312600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.312600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.90
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.90
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 4697 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4882 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2783 to -28.5409 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4882 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2783 to -28.5409 deg
Loaded 9498 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3848 out of 3914 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3914 out of 4697 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 5190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4883 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2653 to -28.4593 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4883 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2653 to -28.4593 deg
Loaded 9578 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4228 out of 4314 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4314 out of 5190 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.2 pix Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
2.8 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.9 mag. Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
14.0 mag. Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.XKPiNFHuHb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, bad_region=884, passed=4697
Got 4697 stars (including 3539 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4697 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3440 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3422 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3422 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3422 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3438 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3421 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3421 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 3421 stars left (next iteration limit 3764)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=3421 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.607 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.429 n_q1=983 n_q2=510 n_q3=1399 n_q4=529 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.207
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.TlyIafgTKX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=358, bad_region=946, passed=5190
Got 5190 stars (including 3946 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5190 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 3813 stars left (next iteration limit 4196)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits N_match=3813 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=1134 n_q2=577 n_q3=1517 n_q4=585 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.sAPJQ8eJLl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=327, bad_region=1560, passed=6065
Got 6065 stars (including 4249 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6065 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4162 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4145 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4145 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4145 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4162 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4145 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4145 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4145 stars left (next iteration limit 4559)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4145 robust_rms=6.970 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.672 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4145 robust_rms=0.482 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.533 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4145 robust_rms=0.465 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.506 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4145 robust_rms_before=0.903 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.459 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.465 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.504 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.506
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.504 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits N_match=4145 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.454 n_q1=1304 n_q2=933 n_q3=1258 n_q4=650 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.PiNO5rkdzd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=363, bad_region=1567, passed=6042
Got 6042 stars (including 4191 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6042 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4105 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4088 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4088 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4103 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4088 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4088 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4088 stars left (next iteration limit 4496)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4088 robust_rms=6.894 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.509 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4088 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.529 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4088 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.503 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4088 robust_rms_before=0.867 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.459 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.489 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.525 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.529
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.525 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits N_match=4088 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.479 n_q1=1289 n_q2=911 n_q3=1251 n_q4=637 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=0.503 worst_q_ratio=1.207
ref2=Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits sigma_overall=0.434 worst_q_ratio=1.102
new1=fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits sigma_overall=0.460 worst_q_ratio=1.098
new2=fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits sigma_overall=0.458 worst_q_ratio=1.163
reference average sigma_overall=0.4685 worst_q_ratio=1.1545
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229_astrometric_residuals.png (3421 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211_astrometric_residuals.png (3813 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130_astrometric_residuals.png (4145 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131_astrometric_residuals.png (4088 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:50:53.73 -32:12:42.6: 11.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:01:47.95 -31:48:40.1: 11.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:32:32.87 -31:20:05.1: 10.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:40:00.09 -30:57:46.6: 11.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:50:53.73 -32:12:42.6: 11.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:01:47.95 -31:48:40.1: 11.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:32:32.87 -31:20:05.1: 10.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:40:00.09 -30:57:46.6: 11.64 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:47.95 -31:48:40.1: ref_mag=11.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0266 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:53.73 -32:12:42.6: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8578 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:00.09 -30:57:46.6: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=10.7662 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:32.87 -31:20:05.1: ref_mag=10.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8943 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20975_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 20975_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:29.89 -38:05:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21195_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 21195_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21223_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 21223_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21225_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 21225_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21295_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 21295_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 937.5'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:25.124 -34:01:06.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
Image size: 936.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:33.243 -34:00:31.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:25.124 -34:01:06.26
Second-epoch image center 19:49:33.243 -34:00:31.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0297 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
Image size: 936.8'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:32.459 -33:59:51.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:25.124 -34:01:06.26
Second-epoch image center 19:49:32.459 -33:59:51.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0327 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:49:33.243 -34:00:31.29
Second-epoch second image center 19:49:32.459 -33:59:51.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01136 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EPBZitwBSR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gwtIytQqfQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3gJD0snl63
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gSWUWOzhHm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 44272 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.3598 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2932 to -28.4731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.3598 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2932 to -28.4731 deg
Loaded 9674 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7462 out of 7948 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7948 out of 44272 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.096600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.096600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.08
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.08
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 44272 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.3598 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2932 to -28.4731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.3598 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2932 to -28.4731 deg
Loaded 9674 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7462 out of 7948 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7948 out of 44272 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 46244 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4021 to 307.3750 deg, Dec -39.2653 to -28.4527 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4021 to 307.3750 deg, Dec -39.2653 to -28.4527 deg
Loaded 9650 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7461 out of 7928 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7928 out of 46244 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
14.2 mag. Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.EPBZitwBSR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1818, bad_region=6219, passed=44263
Got 44263 stars (including 36412 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44263 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5332)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.424 n_q1=1441 n_q2=760 n_q3=1839 n_q4=808 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gwtIytQqfQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1811, bad_region=5711, passed=46241
Got 46241 stars (including 38887 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46241 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5337)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1416 n_q2=711 n_q3=1940 n_q4=786 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3gJD0snl63 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1944, bad_region=8551, passed=41792
Got 41792 stars (including 31888 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41792 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=6.697 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.403 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.486 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.541 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.467 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.514 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4884 robust_rms_before=0.909 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.461 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.486 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.508 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.541
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.508 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.488 n_q1=1564 n_q2=1059 n_q3=1496 n_q4=765 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.121
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gSWUWOzhHm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=2093, bad_region=8652, passed=43066
Got 43066 stars (including 33104 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43066 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4887 stars left (next iteration limit 5375)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=6.704 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.160 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=0.487 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.520 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=0.460 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.496 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4887 robust_rms_before=0.872 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.447 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.487 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.511 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.520
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.511 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits N_match=4887 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.469 n_q1=1577 n_q2=1068 n_q3=1485 n_q4=757 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-25-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_224541_TTUQ2b1x1_2896501_hs88iBWI/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:50:26.36 -37:46:40.4: 13.10 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:53:04.29 -36:58:31.7: 13.13 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:55:37.92 -32:21:31.1: 12.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:01:21.51 -37:36:59.7: 10.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:27:58.49 -37:31:01.9: 14.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:35:49.59 -32:29:54.3: 14.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:02:54.14 -36:32:37.7: 13.34 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:32:25.32 -33:34:54.7: 13.43 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:53:04.29 -36:58:31.7: 13.25 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:55:37.92 -32:21:31.1: 12.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:02:54.14 -36:32:37.7: 13.22 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:35:49.59 -32:29:54.3: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:27:58.49 -37:31:01.9: 14.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:04.29 -36:58:31.7: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3536 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:37.92 -32:21:31.1: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7734 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:50:26.36 -37:46:40.4: 13.06 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:01:21.51 -37:36:59.7: 11.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:54.14 -36:32:37.7: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4120 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:26.36 -37:46:40.4: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.2904 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:21.51 -37:36:59.7: ref_mag=10.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0716 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:32:25.32 -33:34:54.7: 13.50 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:25.32 -33:34:54.7: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5689 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:03:25.48 -36:34:57.7: 13.58 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:11:06.82 -38:06:38.4: 13.74 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:03:25.48 -36:34:57.7: 13.46 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:25.48 -36:34:57.7: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2567 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:11:06.82 -38:06:38.4: 13.57 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:06.82 -38:06:38.4: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.1665 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:10:28.49 -35:49:35.3: 13.87 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:11:42.74 -38:05:02.3: 13.43 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:04:38.04 -36:07:54.1: 13.84 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:08:28.45 -37:40:02.8: 13.71 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:00:40.72 -37:00:37.5: 13.71 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:10:28.49 -35:49:35.3: 13.82 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:28.49 -35:49:35.3: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.3544 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:11:42.74 -38:05:02.3: 13.33 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:42.74 -38:05:02.3: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2915 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:08:28.45 -37:40:02.8: 13.96 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:28.45 -37:40:02.8: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.4840 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:04:38.04 -36:07:54.1: 13.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:00:40.72 -37:00:37.5: 13.94 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:38.04 -36:07:54.1: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.4347 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:40.72 -37:00:37.5: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.4692 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:11:18.41 -36:29:21.7: 13.65 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:51:50.59 -36:45:38.6: 13.52 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:09:11.47 -37:29:54.8: 13.59 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:11:18.41 -36:29:21.7: 13.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:51:50.59 -36:45:38.6: 13.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:18.41 -36:29:21.7: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3900 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:50.59 -36:45:38.6: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4313 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:09:11.47 -37:29:54.8: 13.43 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:11.47 -37:29:54.8: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3303 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:07:06.54 -37:08:56.7: 13.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:49:45.36 -36:44:15.5: 13.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:06:48.26 -36:11:39.2: 13.99 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:09:02.31 -37:51:13.7: 13.67 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:10:19.49 -38:03:24.5: 13.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:09:02.31 -37:51:13.7: 14.22 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:06:48.26 -36:11:39.2: 14.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:07:06.54 -37:08:56.7: 13.55 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:49:45.36 -36:44:15.5: 13.49 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:48.26 -36:11:39.2: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.4780 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:02.31 -37:51:13.7: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.3940 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:06.54 -37:08:56.7: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4069 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:45.36 -36:44:15.5: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4067 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:10:19.49 -38:03:24.5: 14.37 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:19.49 -38:03:24.5: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5423 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:08:50.05 -32:43:26.6: 13.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:10:02.78 -37:59:17.0: 13.63 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:10:31.06 -38:06:39.7: 13.86 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:08:50.05 -32:43:26.6: 13.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:50.05 -32:43:26.6: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5178 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:10:02.78 -37:59:17.0: 13.75 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:02.78 -37:59:17.0: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.1654 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:10:31.06 -38:06:39.7: 13.83 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:31.06 -38:06:39.7: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.4736 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:59:48.37 -36:52:12.1: 13.87 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:06:10.60 -36:18:43.1: 13.86 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:08:37.01 -36:42:21.4: 13.83 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:08:59.36 -36:26:15.0: 13.76 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:04:58.50 -37:00:20.6: 13.87 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:06:10.60 -36:18:43.1: 13.79 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:59:48.37 -36:52:12.1: 13.90 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:08:37.01 -36:42:21.4: 13.93 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:48.37 -36:52:12.1: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5630 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:10.60 -36:18:43.1: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5172 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:37.01 -36:42:21.4: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5915 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:04:58.50 -37:00:20.6: 13.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:08:59.36 -36:26:15.0: 13.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:58.50 -37:00:20.6: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4130 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:59.36 -36:26:15.0: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.3830 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:09:52.08 -36:50:29.6: 13.65 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:46:29.87 -30:11:44.4: 13.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:08:46.17 -36:20:41.9: 14.26 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:09:52.08 -36:50:29.6: 14.17 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:52.08 -36:50:29.6: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6206 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:46:29.87 -30:11:44.4: 13.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:06:31.61 -37:38:29.0: 13.78 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:29.87 -30:11:44.4: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3963 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:11:06.70 -37:53:08.7: 13.99 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:08:46.17 -36:20:41.9: 14.08 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:04:45.10 -36:44:02.2: 13.79 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:06:46.39 -37:11:19.2: 13.88 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:46.17 -36:20:41.9: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.6210 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:31:33.73 -29:59:01.8: 13.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:06:31.61 -37:38:29.0: 13.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:31.61 -37:38:29.0: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5131 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:11:06.70 -37:53:08.7: 13.60 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:06.70 -37:53:08.7: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5843 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:06:46.39 -37:11:19.2: 13.86 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:04:45.10 -36:44:02.2: 14.52 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:46.39 -37:11:19.2: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5256 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:45.10 -36:44:02.2: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.6270 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:31:33.73 -29:59:01.8: 13.33 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:31:33.73 -29:59:01.8: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4081 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:05:03.01 -36:35:40.9: 13.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:01:39.46 -37:58:06.2: 13.53 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:03:17.88 -37:02:01.2: 13.90 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:05:03.01 -36:35:40.9: 13.92 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:03.01 -36:35:40.9: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6102 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:01:39.46 -37:58:06.2: 13.94 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:39.46 -37:58:06.2: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.3200 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:03:17.88 -37:02:01.2: 13.87 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:40:43.95 -32:36:10.3: 14.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:17.88 -37:02:01.2: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5182 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:01:35.11 -37:44:59.6: 13.72 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:04:44.59 -37:27:44.4: 13.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:54:34.93 -36:34:57.8: 13.85 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:34:07.64 -33:08:42.9: 13.37 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:40:43.95 -32:36:10.3: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:01:35.11 -37:44:59.6: 13.87 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:35.11 -37:44:59.6: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.4540 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:34:07.64 -33:08:42.9: 13.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:54:34.93 -36:34:57.8: 13.96 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:34:07.64 -33:08:42.9: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4050 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:34.93 -36:34:57.8: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5600 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:04:44.59 -37:27:44.4: 13.89 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:44.59 -37:27:44.4: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6013 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:55:10.37 -36:55:01.5: 14.26 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:46:43.17 -33:58:06.8: 13.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:59:52.87 -38:06:58.0: 13.63 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:55:10.37 -36:55:01.5: 14.40 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:10.37 -36:55:01.5: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=13.6544 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:46:43.17 -33:58:06.8: 13.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:43.17 -33:58:06.8: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5763 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:52:24.56 -38:04:07.5: 13.56 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:48:44.54 -37:30:11.2: 13.68 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:59:52.87 -38:06:58.0: 13.68 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:45:44.58 -31:12:36.6: 13.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:52.87 -38:06:58.0: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6518 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:52:24.56 -38:04:07.5: 13.97 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:24.56 -38:04:07.5: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5815 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:48:44.54 -37:30:11.2: 13.99 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:45:44.58 -31:12:36.6: 13.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:44.54 -37:30:11.2: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5152 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:45:44.58 -31:12:36.6: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.4981 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out61965.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31616.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out59088.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out60124.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 54s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55584_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 55584_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55586_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 55586_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55589_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 55589_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55592_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 55592_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55597_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 55597_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55600_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 55600_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56553_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 56553_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:17.32 -37:35:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58492_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 58492_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:30.05 -32:34:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59088_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 59088_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60124_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 60124_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60483_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 60483_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60718_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 60718_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60973_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 60973_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61109_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61109_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61214_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61214_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61227_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61227_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61229_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61229_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:33.53 -33:48:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61316_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61316_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61332_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61332_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61337_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61337_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61345_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61345_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61348_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61348_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61449_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61449_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61463_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61463_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61525_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61525_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61532_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61532_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61535_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61535_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61551_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61551_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61558_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61558_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61566_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61566_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61567_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61567_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61645_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61645_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61682_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61682_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61724_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61724_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61785_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61785_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61793_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61793_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61825_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61825_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61841_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61841_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61854_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61854_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61861_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61861_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61897_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61897_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61901_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61901_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61927_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61927_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61930_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61930_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61935_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61935_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61948_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61948_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61965_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61965_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:43.95 -32:36:10.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.981 6750901755601587456 295.18249413771 -32.60271811782 13.0525 11.3848 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.981#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61966_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 61966_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62017_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 62017_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62104_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 62104_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62121_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 62121_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62127_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 62127_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62142_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 62142_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62168_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 62168_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62233_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 62233_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31616_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 31616_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08766_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 08766_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:31.48 -36:22:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02972_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 02972_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:29.90 -38:05:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52164_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131
The candidate 52164_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_22-26-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0131 did not pass the final checks