This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.4195 2461301.9195 13.82 02:53:26.94 +04:30:21.4
170.56086 -46.77121 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.489 Comacina -1 -0 1 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:53:26.94 +04:30:21.4: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:53:26.94 +04:30:21.4: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.4195* 02 53 26.94 +04 30 21.4 13.8 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.9195,13.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.4195 13.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.4195 2461301.9195 14.38 02:36:28.90 +08:33:39.7
162.11173 -46.16680 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.528 Rezia -0 0 0 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:36:28.90 +08:33:39.7: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:36:28.90 +08:33:39.7: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.4195* 02 36 28.90 +08 33 39.7 14.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.9195,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.4195 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.4195 2461301.9195 14.39 02:04:15.29 +10:29:40.2
150.51434 -48.43881 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.401 Ottilia -1 1 1 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:04:15.29 +10:29:40.2: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:04:15.29 +10:29:40.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.9195,14.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.4195 14.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.4195 2461301.9195 14.52 02:38:49.72 +10:35:48.2
161.15957 -44.15975 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.99 Dike 0 1 1 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:38:49.72 +10:35:48.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:38:49.72 +10:35:48.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.4195* 02 38 49.72 +10 35 48.2 14.5 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.9195,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.4195 14.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.4195 2461301.9195 15.05 02:16:34.77 +03:35:23.5
159.99042 -53.04409 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3066 McFadden 0 0 0 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:16:34.77 +03:35:23.5: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:16:34.77 +03:35:23.5: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.4195* 02 16 34.77 +03 35 23.5 15.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.9195,15.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.4195 15.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.65164513 09.01.2026 03:38:12.139 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
First image: 2461049.65164513 09.01.2026 03:38:12.139 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
Last image: 2461301.91987285 18.09.2026 10:04:27.014 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7259
Objects passed selection criteria: 7252
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6878.75
Average stars matched: 6617 (96.1948 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233208 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 05:08:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.65164513 09.01.2026 03:38:12.139 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
First image: 2461049.65164513 09.01.2026 03:38:12.139 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
Last image: 2461301.91987285 18.09.2026 10:04:27.014 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 57
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 38717
Objects passed selection criteria: 38627
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 37000
Average stars matched: 35349.2 (95.5385 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 259212 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 05:09:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461301.91915380
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:17.841 +05:57:06.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:02.261 +05:59:24.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:17.841 +05:57:06.29
Second-epoch image center 02:34:02.261 +05:59:24.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0751 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:33:59.840 +05:59:55.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:17.841 +05:57:06.29
Second-epoch image center 02:33:59.840 +05:59:55.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0881 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:34:02.261 +05:59:24.48
Second-epoch second image center 02:33:59.840 +05:59:55.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01314 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BEk6RB29xA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tI9sHfAXuq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YbXUwUmfcC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SkbFL1Amzm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits and wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits and wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits and wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6825 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5975 to 46.5543 deg, Dec +0.6642 to +11.2221 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5975 to 46.5543 deg, Dec 0.6642 to 11.2221 deg
Loaded 4343 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3524 out of 3708 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3708 out of 6825 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.919250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.919250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6825 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5975 to 46.5543 deg, Dec +0.6642 to +11.2221 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5975 to 46.5543 deg, Dec 0.6642 to 11.2221 deg
Loaded 4343 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3524 out of 3708 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3708 out of 6825 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 6826 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5976 to 46.5545 deg, Dec +0.6642 to +11.2221 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5976 to 46.5545 deg, Dec 0.6642 to 11.2221 deg
Loaded 4343 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3543 out of 3715 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3715 out of 6826 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
2.0 pix Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
15.4 mag. Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.BEk6RB29xA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=496, bad_region=0, passed=6825
Got 6825 stars (including 6320 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6825 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Excluding outliers - 4861 stars left (next iteration limit 5347)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits N_match=4861 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.226 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.223 n_q1=1085 n_q2=1224 n_q3=1327 n_q4=1225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.381
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits -region wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tI9sHfAXuq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=473, bad_region=0, passed=6826
Got 6826 stars (including 6340 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6826 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6826 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6826 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6826 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4862 stars left (next iteration limit 5348)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits N_match=4862 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.222 n_q1=1094 n_q2=1222 n_q3=1321 n_q4=1225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.385
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits -region wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YbXUwUmfcC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=429, bad_region=0, passed=7034
Got 7034 stars (including 6597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7034 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4863 stars left (next iteration limit 5348)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4863 robust_rms=10.422 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.726 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4863 robust_rms=0.370 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.397 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4863 robust_rms=0.256 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.286 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4863 robust_rms_before=0.987 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.264 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.256 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.299 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.286
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.299 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits N_match=4863 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.243 n_q1=1131 n_q2=1198 n_q3=1345 n_q4=1189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.SkbFL1Amzm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=433, bad_region=0, passed=6969
Got 6969 stars (including 6527 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6969 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4863 stars left (next iteration limit 5349)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4863 robust_rms=10.560 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.854 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4863 robust_rms=0.406 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.442 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4863 robust_rms=0.291 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.321 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4863 robust_rms_before=0.980 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.291 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.334 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.321
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.334 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits N_match=4863 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1127 n_q2=1191 n_q3=1345 n_q4=1200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits sigma_overall=0.256 worst_q_ratio=1.381
ref2=Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits sigma_overall=0.265 worst_q_ratio=1.385
new1=fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits sigma_overall=0.270 worst_q_ratio=1.137
new2=fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits sigma_overall=0.303 worst_q_ratio=1.130
reference average sigma_overall=0.2605 worst_q_ratio=1.383
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109_astrometric_residuals.png (4861 matched stars from wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110_astrometric_residuals.png (4862 matched stars from wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451_astrometric_residuals.png (4863 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452_astrometric_residuals.png (4863 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:29:42.64 +08:28:58.6: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:25:35.23 +08:43:19.8: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:54:16.33 +05:02:31.2: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:26:47.45 +10:32:58.8: 11.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:29:42.64 +08:28:58.6: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:25:35.23 +08:43:19.8: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:54:16.33 +05:02:31.2: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:26:47.45 +10:32:58.8: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:29:42.64 +08:28:58.6: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3479 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:25:35.23 +08:43:19.8: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0974 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:54:16.33 +05:02:31.2: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2572 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:26:47.45 +10:32:58.8: ref_mag=11.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6254 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20442_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 20442_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20496_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 20496_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20512_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 20512_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20526_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 20526_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:17.841 +05:57:06.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:02.261 +05:59:24.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:17.841 +05:57:06.29
Second-epoch image center 02:34:02.261 +05:59:24.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0751 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:33:59.840 +05:59:55.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:17.841 +05:57:06.29
Second-epoch image center 02:33:59.840 +05:59:55.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0881 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:34:02.261 +05:59:24.48
Second-epoch second image center 02:33:59.840 +05:59:55.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01314 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits &> /tmp/tmp.95dy2VuNnA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R6KikU23RW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X9cUuqoRBg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FZeESzctKx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits and wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits and wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits and wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 37023 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5751 to 46.5543 deg, Dec +0.6554 to +11.2409 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5751 to 46.5543 deg, Dec 0.6554 to 11.2409 deg
Loaded 4358 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3415 out of 3770 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3770 out of 37023 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.820100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.820100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 37023 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5751 to 46.5543 deg, Dec +0.6554 to +11.2409 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5751 to 46.5543 deg, Dec 0.6554 to 11.2409 deg
Loaded 4358 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3415 out of 3770 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3770 out of 37023 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 37062 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5930 to 46.5639 deg, Dec +0.6559 to +11.2429 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5930 to 46.5639 deg, Dec 0.6559 to 11.2429 deg
Loaded 4356 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3419 out of 3768 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3768 out of 37062 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 51 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
1.9 pix Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
15.6 mag. Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.95dy2VuNnA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1594, bad_region=5, passed=37008
Got 37008 stars (including 35339 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37008 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5353)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits N_match=4867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.226 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.217 n_q1=1082 n_q2=1224 n_q3=1336 n_q4=1225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.371
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits -region wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.R6KikU23RW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1597, bad_region=4, passed=37046
Got 37046 stars (including 35377 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37046 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37046 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37046 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37046 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.218 n_q1=1088 n_q2=1221 n_q3=1332 n_q4=1225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.328
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits -region wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.X9cUuqoRBg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1409, bad_region=45, passed=37244
Got 37244 stars (including 35724 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37244 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37244 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37244 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37244 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5350)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=10.383 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.913 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.365 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.394 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.250 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.277 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4864 robust_rms_before=0.986 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.257 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.250 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.291 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.277
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.291 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.239 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=1140 n_q2=1192 n_q3=1341 n_q4=1191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FZeESzctKx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1491, bad_region=46, passed=37701
Got 37701 stars (including 36087 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37701 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37701 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37701 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37701 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=10.483 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.276 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=0.399 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.440 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=0.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.310 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4860 robust_rms_before=0.978 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.287 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.319 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.310
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.319 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1136 n_q2=1184 n_q3=1340 n_q4=1200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.110
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-03-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_050617_TTUQ1b1x1_3195710_W9iFxkri/wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:53:26.94 +04:30:21.4: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:26:47.45 +10:32:58.7: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:20:56.01 +09:43:30.7: 14.72 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:21:54.09 +09:35:43.6: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:14:38.14 +02:04:31.5: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:31:35.92 +10:14:30.9: 14.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:26:21.90 +08:05:36.7: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:10:08.07 +06:20:20.3: 14.41 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:04:15.29 +10:29:40.2: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:36:28.90 +08:33:39.7: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:53:26.94 +04:30:21.4: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:21:54.09 +09:35:43.6: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:26:21.90 +08:05:36.7: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:14:38.14 +02:04:31.5: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:31:35.92 +10:14:30.9: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:26:47.45 +10:32:58.7: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:20:56.01 +09:43:30.7: 14.67 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:26:21.90 +08:05:36.7: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1509 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:21:54.09 +09:35:43.6: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8056 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:14:38.14 +02:04:31.5: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7989 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:31:35.92 +10:14:30.9: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6583 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:26:47.45 +10:32:58.7: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6818 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:20:56.01 +09:43:30.7: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8594 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:10:08.07 +06:20:20.3: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:04:15.29 +10:29:40.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:10:08.07 +06:20:20.3: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3954 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:36:28.90 +08:33:39.7: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:04:19.03 +04:39:30.3: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:38:49.72 +10:35:48.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 03:00:20.19 +04:58:18.6: 15.78 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:57:29.50 +10:27:09.1: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 03:03:18.08 +02:07:51.5: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:05:29.47 +03:32:47.5: 15.17 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:37:03.95 +05:27:50.8: 14.49 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:04:19.03 +04:39:30.3: 15.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 03:00:20.19 +04:58:18.6: 15.40 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 03:03:18.08 +02:07:51.5: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:38:49.72 +10:35:48.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:57:29.50 +10:27:09.1: 14.65 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:04:19.03 +04:39:30.3: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7386 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:18.08 +02:07:51.5: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6480 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:00:20.19 +04:58:18.6: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.9349 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:57:29.50 +10:27:09.1: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8450 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:05:29.47 +03:32:47.5: 14.99 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:05:29.47 +03:32:47.5: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8569 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:37:03.95 +05:27:50.8: 14.74 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:37:03.95 +05:27:50.8: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6883 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 03:01:54.46 +03:31:34.1: 15.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:09:44.12 +01:46:19.5: 15.12 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:08:08.74 +09:34:20.9: 15.44 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:53:07.79 +09:05:32.6: 15.71 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:47:13.57 +10:35:34.4: 15.30 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:18:03.16 +01:31:06.0: 15.45 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 03:01:54.46 +03:31:34.1: 15.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:08:08.74 +09:34:20.9: 14.99 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:09:44.12 +01:46:19.5: 15.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:01:54.46 +03:31:34.1: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8498 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:08:08.74 +09:34:20.9: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9339 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:53:07.79 +09:05:32.6: 15.14 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:09:44.12 +01:46:19.5: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9196 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:47:13.57 +10:35:34.4: 15.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:53:07.79 +09:05:32.6: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9725 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:47:13.57 +10:35:34.4: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9250 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:18:03.16 +01:31:06.0: 15.25 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:18:03.16 +01:31:06.0: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9397 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:59:48.77 +05:44:33.1: 15.26 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:26:28.35 +01:19:36.4: 15.25 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:14:00.96 +11:09:34.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:13:31.08 +01:35:38.2: 15.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:06:35.22 +01:49:14.5: 15.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:30:49.23 +01:40:42.5: 15.28 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:59:48.77 +05:44:33.1: 15.44 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:14:00.96 +11:09:34.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:14:00.96 +11:09:34.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:06:35.22 +01:49:14.5: 15.40 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:13:31.08 +01:35:38.2: 15.48 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:59:48.77 +05:44:33.1: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0068 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:06:35.22 +01:49:14.5: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7532 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:13:31.08 +01:35:38.2: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9965 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:26:28.35 +01:19:36.4: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:26:28.35 +01:19:36.4: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7840 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:30:49.23 +01:40:42.5: 15.34 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:30:49.23 +01:40:42.5: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9957 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:05:44.32 +07:10:31.4: 15.14 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:03:13.01 +05:28:27.0: 15.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:12:27.11 +06:08:50.0: 15.20 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:50:55.70 +01:29:48.0: 15.15 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:15:30.49 +02:34:21.3: 15.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:19:25.70 +02:19:33.6: 15.26 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:05:44.32 +07:10:31.4: 15.15 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:05:44.32 +07:10:31.4: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8961 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:03:13.01 +05:28:27.0: 15.24 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:12:27.11 +06:08:50.0: 14.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:03:13.01 +05:28:27.0: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8817 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:12:27.11 +06:08:50.0: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9862 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:50:55.70 +01:29:48.0: 14.94 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:15:30.49 +02:34:21.3: 15.03 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:50:55.70 +01:29:48.0: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8268 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:15:30.49 +02:34:21.3: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9087 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:19:25.70 +02:19:33.6: 15.27 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:19:25.70 +02:19:33.6: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9587 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:21:07.94 +03:45:53.0: 15.34 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:17:30.44 +04:33:31.7: 14.83 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:13:37.24 +08:11:46.0: 15.20 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:18:44.57 +02:27:06.8: 15.43 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:08:44.49 +08:51:57.2: 15.01 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:16:34.77 +03:35:23.5: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:17:30.44 +04:33:31.7: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:21:07.94 +03:45:53.0: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:17:30.44 +04:33:31.7: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8478 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:21:07.94 +03:45:53.0: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0544 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:13:37.24 +08:11:46.0: 15.11 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:18:44.57 +02:27:06.8: 15.62 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:08:44.49 +08:51:57.2: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:13:37.24 +08:11:46.0: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0371 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:18:44.57 +02:27:06.8: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9906 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:08:44.49 +08:51:57.2: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0207 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:16:34.77 +03:35:23.5: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:29:34.36 +01:06:24.2: 15.59 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:08:45.10 +04:48:47.6: 15.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:08:49.78 +07:18:27.2: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:10:16.62 +05:52:14.3: 15.33 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:06:09.43 +05:54:10.1: 15.33 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:08:49.78 +07:18:27.2: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:29:34.36 +01:06:24.2: 15.30 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:08:45.10 +04:48:47.6: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:10:16.62 +05:52:14.3: 15.48 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:08:49.78 +07:18:27.2: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8565 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:29:34.36 +01:06:24.2: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0791 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:08:45.10 +04:48:47.6: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9823 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:10:16.62 +05:52:14.3: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0313 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:06:09.43 +05:54:10.1: 15.38 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:06:09.43 +05:54:10.1: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9964 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0109.fits at 02:03:48.45 +03:20:01.4: 15.18 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-38-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits at 02:03:48.45 +03:20:01.4: 15.28 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:03:48.45 +03:20:01.4: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9545 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52992.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53311.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53357.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53387.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53682.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52439_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 52439_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52448_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 52448_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52451_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 52451_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:09:37.73 +09:08:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52453_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 52453_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52456_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 52456_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:26:01.95 +10:24:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52457_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 52457_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52566_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 52566_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52821_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 52821_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:56:08.73 +08:21:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52992_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
Preparing report for the candidate 52992_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53031_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53031_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53311_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
Preparing report for the candidate 53311_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53323_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53323_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53357_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
Preparing report for the candidate 53357_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53363_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53363_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:47:36.22 +10:35:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53387_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
Preparing report for the candidate 53387_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53388_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53388_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53533_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53533_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53542_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53542_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53543_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53543_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53547_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53547_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53564_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53564_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53568_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53568_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53580_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53580_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53582_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53582_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53593_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53593_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53603_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53603_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53613_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53613_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53614_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53614_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53616_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53616_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53625_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53625_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53627_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53627_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53628_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53628_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53631_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53631_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53636_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53636_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53637_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53637_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53640_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53640_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53663_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53663_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53665_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53665_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53667_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53667_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53672_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53672_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53673_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53673_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53674_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53674_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53675_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53675_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53677_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53677_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53682_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
Preparing report for the candidate 53682_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53684_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53684_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53692_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53692_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53697_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53697_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53714_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53714_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53719_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53719_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53722_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452
The candidate 53722_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-04-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452 did not pass the final checks
