This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3957* 04 13 35.77 +21 01 46.0 7.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8958,7.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3958 7.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3958 2461301.8958 12.38 03:40:29.51 +21:19:34.5
167.40956 -26.59701 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.64 Angelina -1 -0 1 12.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:29.51 +21:19:34.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:29.51 +21:19:34.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3957* 03 40 29.51 +21 19 34.5 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8958,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3958 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3957* 04 13 35.77 +21 01 46.1 7.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8958,7.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3958 7.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3958 2461301.8958 12.71 03:30:27.96 +18:29:54.6
167.54173 -30.27595 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.72 Feronia -0 -0 0 12.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:27.96 +18:29:54.6: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:27.96 +18:29:54.6: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3957* 03 30 27.96 +18 29 54.6 12.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8958,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3958 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3958 2461301.8958 13.29 04:04:36.26 +17:54:55.1
174.56001 -25.03471 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato 0 -0 0 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:36.26 +17:54:55.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:36.26 +17:54:55.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3957* 04 04 36.26 +17 54 55.1 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8958,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3958 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3958 2461301.8958 13.40 04:08:53.66 +22:42:36.1
171.51474 -21.01594 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.83 Beatrix -0 0 0 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:08:53.66 +22:42:36.1: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:08:53.66 +22:42:36.1: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3957* 04 08 53.66 +22 42 36.1 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8958,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3958 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3958 2461301.8958 13.69 03:09:18.14 +25:28:02.1
158.21354 -27.80029 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.188 Menippe 0 0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:09:18.14 +25:28:02.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:09:18.14 +25:28:02.1: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3957* 03 09 18.14 +25 28 02.1 13.7 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8958,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3958 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3958 2461301.8958 14.16 03:28:25.89 +23:06:05.8
163.74007 -27.06731 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.830 Petropolitana -0 -0 0 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:25.89 +23:06:05.8: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:25.89 +23:06:05.8: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3957* 03 28 25.89 +23 06 05.8 14.2 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8958,14.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3958 14.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3958 2461301.8958 14.13 03:12:31.53 +22:05:33.0
161.14298 -30.11645 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.514 Armida -0 0 0 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:12:31.53 +22:05:33.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:12:31.53 +22:05:33.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3957* 03 12 31.53 +22 05 33.0 14.1 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8958,14.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3958 14.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3958 2461301.8958 14.21 04:12:15.53 +22:38:42.7
172.13521 -20.49641 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.162 Laurentia -1 -1 1 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:12:15.53 +22:38:42.7: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:12:15.53 +22:38:42.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3957* 04 12 15.53 +22 38 42.7 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8958,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3958 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3958 2461301.8958 14.35 03:50:10.57 +17:06:15.3
172.55106 -28.07812 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.131 Vala 0 -1 1 14.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:50:10.57 +17:06:15.3: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:50:10.57 +17:06:15.3: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3957* 03 50 10.57 +17 06 15.3 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8958,14.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3958 14.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3958 2461301.8958 14.80 03:19:03.91 +23:13:05.2
161.75055 -28.31033 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.640 Brambilla -1 -1 2 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:19:03.91 +23:13:05.2: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:19:03.91 +23:13:05.2: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3957* 03 19 03.91 +23 13 05.2 14.8 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8958,14.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3958 14.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3958 2461301.8958 14.82 03:40:39.45 +26:45:04.7
163.51177 -22.48959 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.613 Ginevra 0 -0 0 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:39.45 +26:45:04.7: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:39.45 +26:45:04.7: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3957* 03 40 39.45 +26 45 04.7 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8958,14.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3958 14.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3958 2461301.8958 14.73 03:48:02.66 +21:42:26.6
168.55927 -25.12716 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.859 Bouzareah 0 -0 0 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:02.66 +21:42:26.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:02.66 +21:42:26.6: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3957* 03 48 02.66 +21 42 26.6 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8958,14.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3958 14.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3957* 04 12 32.96 +21 03 42.7 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J063.1375+21.0619,2461301.8958,14.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J063.1375+21.0619 20260918.3958 14.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461301.89606147 18.09.2026 09:30:09.711 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 17
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12435
Objects passed selection criteria: 12426
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11836
Average stars matched: 11277.8 (95.2835 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 238400 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 04:33:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461301.89606147 18.09.2026 09:30:09.711 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 172
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.10
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 33 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 70096
Objects passed selection criteria: 69918
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 66431.8
Average stars matched: 64127.5 (96.5314 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 540664 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 04:35:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461301.89544206
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:54.050 +21:59:41.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:54.050 +21:59:41.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0803 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:53.511 +22:00:10.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:53.511 +22:00:10.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0783 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:54.050 +21:59:41.16
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:53.511 +22:00:10.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00838 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FfMOk8ldzT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c6iYufCfA6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.odgApMdwzQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tNx62LkieO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.5175 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.5175 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4761 out of 5130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5130 out of 11315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 17 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.FfMOk8ldzT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=882, bad_region=0, passed=11324
Got 11324 stars (including 10422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1548 n_q2=1222 n_q3=1071 n_q4=1082 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.c6iYufCfA6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=0, passed=11315
Got 11315 stars (including 10408 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=1546 n_q2=1221 n_q3=1073 n_q4=1081 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.338
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.odgApMdwzQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=683, bad_region=0, passed=12502
Got 12502 stars (including 11807 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12502 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5412)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=9.397 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.492 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.326 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.334 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.259 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.298 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4921 robust_rms_before=1.289 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.285 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.259 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.329 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.298
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.329 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=1093 n_q2=1042 n_q3=1249 n_q4=1537 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tNx62LkieO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=677, bad_region=1, passed=12460
Got 12460 stars (including 11764 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5412)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=9.244 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.609 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.322 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.334 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.255 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.307 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4921 robust_rms_before=1.301 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.281 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.255 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.347 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.307
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:53.534 +22:00:08.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 12460 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1186452.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.301 -> 0.255 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4921 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4734 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4734 pairs (4921 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4734 robust_rms=8.981 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.344 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4734 robust_rms=0.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.327 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4734 robust_rms=0.253 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.305 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4734 robust_rms_before=0.252 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.252 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.253 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.304 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.305
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-quadrant 0.305 vs 0.304 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4734 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4734 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits N_match=4734 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1056 n_q2=1000 n_q3=1208 n_q4=1470 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.282
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.278
ref2=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.338
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.201
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits sigma_overall=0.263 worst_q_ratio=1.282
reference average sigma_overall=0.3005 worst_q_ratio=1.308
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (4923 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (4921 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417_astrometric_residuals.png (4921 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418_astrometric_residuals.png (4734 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.20 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:35.84 +23:10:50.2: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:04.54 +21:12:57.5: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:29.51 +21:19:34.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:53:36.76 +25:43:26.7: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:30.56 +25:19:56.3: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:43.08 +22:39:49.9: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:27.97 +20:05:27.8: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:03.92 +22:50:50.1: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:54.02 +22:37:07.4: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:27.97 +20:05:27.8: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:53:36.76 +25:43:26.7: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:03.92 +22:50:50.1: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:29.51 +21:19:34.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:30.56 +25:19:56.3: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:43.08 +22:39:49.9: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:04.54 +21:12:57.5: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:35.84 +23:10:50.2: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:27.97 +20:05:27.8: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3347 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:36.76 +25:43:26.7: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4017 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:03.92 +22:50:50.1: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3442 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:30.56 +25:19:56.3: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3413 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:35.84 +23:10:50.2: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4938 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:04.54 +21:12:57.5: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4012 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:43.08 +22:39:49.9: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4324 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:54.02 +22:37:07.4: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:54.02 +22:37:07.4: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4580 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.1: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:03.39 +21:54:05.2: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:34.51 +19:39:33.8: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:20.43 +20:11:23.7: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:03.39 +21:54:05.2: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:20.43 +20:11:23.7: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:03.39 +21:54:05.2: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4699 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:34.51 +19:39:33.8: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.1: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:20.43 +20:11:23.7: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4976 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.1: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4441 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:34.51 +19:39:33.8: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4227 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20757.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20584_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
Preparing report for the candidate 20584_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20644_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 20644_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.59 +24:42:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20740_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 20740_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20742_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 20742_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20743_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 20743_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20757_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
Preparing report for the candidate 20757_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20758_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 20758_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20760_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 20760_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20764_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 20764_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20766_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 20766_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20767_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 20767_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20773_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 20773_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20777_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 20777_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20779_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 20779_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:21.06 +18:01:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20781_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 20781_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:20.78 +24:28:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20782_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 20782_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20787_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 20787_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
03:40:29.51 +21:19:34.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:54.050 +21:59:41.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:54.050 +21:59:41.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0803 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:53.534 +22:00:08.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:53.534 +22:00:08.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0784 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:54.050 +21:59:41.16
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:53.534 +22:00:08.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00796 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LBajmLNT45
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0ycWLp4T0p
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DM5ak6IJcm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BCVlnGovkj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.4774 to +27.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.4774 to 27.2939 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4354 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 71179 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.10
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.4774 to +27.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.4774 to 27.2939 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4354 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 71179 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 71492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6157 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4359 out of 5185 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5185 out of 71492 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 162 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LBajmLNT45 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=4312, bad_region=7, passed=71155
Got 71155 stars (including 66715 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71155 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4932 stars left (next iteration limit 5425)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.223 n_q1=1490 n_q2=1223 n_q3=1113 n_q4=1106 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0ycWLp4T0p (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4374, bad_region=8, passed=71475
Got 71475 stars (including 66975 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71475 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4928 stars left (next iteration limit 5420)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1490 n_q2=1228 n_q3=1108 n_q4=1102 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.318
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DM5ak6IJcm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=3389, bad_region=45, passed=62330
Got 62330 stars (including 58810 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62330 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5412)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=9.558 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.772 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.332 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.337 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.258 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.302 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4921 robust_rms_before=1.270 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.273 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.258 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.324 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.302
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.324 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1103 n_q2=1056 n_q3=1281 n_q4=1481 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.206
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.BCVlnGovkj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=3376, bad_region=46, passed=62398
Got 62398 stars (including 58889 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=9.562 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.654 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.328 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.338 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.253 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.304 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4921 robust_rms_before=0.253 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.266 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.253 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.306 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.304
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.306 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.236 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=1110 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1285 n_q4=1480 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.252
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-29-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_043122_TTUQ1b1x1_1166461_WMcPnemR/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:55.82 +18:01:15.3: 14.81 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:15.10 +23:21:36.9: 15.22 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:15:18.76 +26:22:56.5: 14.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:11:36.49 +26:04:48.8: 15.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:14:21.98 +23:41:24.0: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:30.09 +24:28:11.7: 14.48 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:14:21.98 +23:41:24.0: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:55.82 +18:01:15.3: 14.78 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:15:18.76 +26:22:56.5: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:11:36.49 +26:04:48.8: 14.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:15.10 +23:21:36.9: 15.57 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:21.98 +23:41:24.0: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9011 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:55.82 +18:01:15.3: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6215 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:30.09 +24:28:11.7: 14.44 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:18.76 +26:22:56.5: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4577 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:36.49 +26:04:48.8: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8713 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:15.10 +23:21:36.9: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.2152 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:30.09 +24:28:11.7: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5087 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:54.44 +23:50:01.0: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:27.96 +18:29:54.6: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:16:44.90 +26:19:52.8: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:54.44 +23:50:01.0: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:54.44 +23:50:01.0: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3443 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:24.24 +22:45:55.1: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:39:54.75 +25:11:45.6: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:27.96 +18:29:54.6: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:16:44.90 +26:19:52.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:44.90 +26:19:52.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:36.26 +17:54:55.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:08:53.66 +22:42:36.1: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:24.24 +22:45:55.1: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:39:54.75 +25:11:45.6: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:09:18.14 +25:28:02.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:24.24 +22:45:55.1: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2916 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:54.75 +25:11:45.6: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8521 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:05.72 +26:52:36.4: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:36.26 +17:54:55.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:08:53.66 +22:42:36.1: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:09:18.14 +25:28:02.1: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:05.72 +26:52:36.4: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:05.72 +26:52:36.4: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5741 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:17:57.84 +21:36:15.3: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:14.99 +24:34:49.1: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:17:57.84 +21:36:15.3: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:57.84 +21:36:15.3: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8543 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:32.34 +26:24:39.2: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:25.89 +23:06:05.8: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:14.99 +24:34:49.1: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:14.99 +24:34:49.1: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9192 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:32.34 +26:24:39.2: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:12:31.53 +22:05:33.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:32.34 +26:24:39.2: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0949 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:25.89 +23:06:05.8: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:17:37.25 +24:35:16.0: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:12:31.53 +22:05:33.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:41:16.02 +26:35:48.4: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:16:21.23 +25:21:02.6: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:17:37.25 +24:35:16.0: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:37.25 +24:35:16.0: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1513 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:41:16.02 +26:35:48.4: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:16.02 +26:35:48.4: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0949 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:16:21.23 +25:21:02.6: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:16:21.23 +25:21:02.6: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2049 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:17:11.73 +19:18:46.0: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:11:51.25 +19:39:47.6: 14.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:17:11.73 +19:18:46.0: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:11.73 +19:18:46.0: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1628 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:43.17 +25:03:03.8: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:19:06.34 +19:52:18.1: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:11:51.25 +19:39:47.6: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:51.25 +19:39:47.6: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2224 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:43.17 +25:03:03.8: 14.52 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:43.17 +25:03:03.8: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3852 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:19:06.34 +19:52:18.1: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:19:06.34 +19:52:18.1: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3382 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:12:15.53 +22:38:42.7: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:57:00.08 +21:54:20.9: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:12:15.53 +22:38:42.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:59:46.37 +26:26:03.3: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:57:00.08 +21:54:20.9: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:00.08 +21:54:20.9: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3102 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:59:46.37 +26:26:03.3: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:46.37 +26:26:03.3: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3895 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:27.13 +18:35:15.9: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:27.13 +18:35:15.9: 14.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:27.13 +18:35:15.9: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3549 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:50:10.57 +17:06:15.3: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:58.94 +23:49:32.5: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:50:10.57 +17:06:15.3: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:58.94 +23:49:32.5: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:58.94 +23:49:32.5: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4478 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:19:03.91 +23:13:05.2: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:11:58.24 +25:23:47.7: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:19:03.91 +23:13:05.2: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:11:58.24 +25:23:47.7: 14.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:58.24 +25:23:47.7: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6800 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:11.29 +23:00:51.8: 15.01 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:11.29 +23:00:51.8: 14.96 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:11.29 +23:00:51.8: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7250 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:32:41.96 +17:39:09.2: 14.67 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:39.45 +26:45:04.7: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:32:41.96 +17:39:09.2: 14.66 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:32:41.96 +17:39:09.2: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6384 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:39.45 +26:45:04.7: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:09:01.24 +23:03:33.6: 15.36 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:10:40.60 +18:39:20.2: 15.21 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:39.47 +24:58:33.2: 15.04 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:09:01.24 +23:03:33.6: 15.22 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:01.24 +23:03:33.6: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8318 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:10:40.60 +18:39:20.2: 15.09 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:45:34.92 +24:25:03.8: 15.19 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:40.60 +18:39:20.2: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7740 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:39.47 +24:58:33.2: 15.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:39.47 +24:58:33.2: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8380 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:02.66 +21:42:26.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:45:34.92 +24:25:03.8: 15.16 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:34.92 +24:25:03.8: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.7112 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:14:49.74 +26:12:20.9: 15.50 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:02.66 +21:42:26.6: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:09:41.03 +22:23:56.0: 15.44 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:13:56.96 +26:49:31.6: 15.11 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:09:15.74 +22:03:55.6: 15.65 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:14:49.74 +26:12:20.9: 15.35 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:49.74 +26:12:20.9: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7930 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:09:41.03 +22:23:56.0: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:41.03 +22:23:56.0: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.9018 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:32:10.45 +26:30:26.0: 15.09 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:13:56.96 +26:49:31.6: 15.41 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:56.96 +26:49:31.6: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0323 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:19:32.00 +21:07:44.5: 15.39 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:15:45.91 +26:30:34.6: 15.05 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:09:15.74 +22:03:55.6: 15.50 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:15.74 +22:03:55.6: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.0116 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:32:10.45 +26:30:26.0: 15.35 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:32:10.45 +26:30:26.0: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8980 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:19:32.00 +21:07:44.5: 15.79 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.53 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:15:45.91 +26:30:34.6: 15.09 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:19:32.00 +21:07:44.5: ref_mag=15.53 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9955 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:15:45.91 +26:30:34.6: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0579 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:16:58.88 +21:58:37.2: 15.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:57.50 +22:17:02.0: 14.81 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:38:56.39 +16:59:00.8: 15.24 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:11:41.62 +22:14:17.5: 15.36 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:16:58.88 +21:58:37.2: 15.28 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:16:58.88 +21:58:37.2: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9624 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:29.99 +27:12:25.7: 15.33 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:57.50 +22:17:02.0: 14.77 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:57.50 +22:17:02.0: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7022 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:09.61 +17:06:36.3: 15.02 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:17:19.73 +22:05:17.7: 15.24 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:08:54.91 +25:05:53.3: 15.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:38:56.39 +16:59:00.8: 15.05 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:56.39 +16:59:00.8: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9903 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:11:41.62 +22:14:17.5: 15.20 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:41.62 +22:14:17.5: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0370 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:29.99 +27:12:25.7: 15.37 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:29.99 +27:12:25.7: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9714 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:09.61 +17:06:36.3: 15.31 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:09.61 +17:06:36.3: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9487 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:17:19.73 +22:05:17.7: 15.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:08:54.91 +25:05:53.3: 15.73 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:19.73 +22:05:17.7: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0224 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:54.91 +25:05:53.3: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9288 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:12:54.96 +19:47:06.8: 15.50 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:13:56.71 +25:20:58.0: 15.36 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:18:08.03 +21:49:03.4: 15.25 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:12:54.96 +19:47:06.8: 15.59 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.54 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:12:54.96 +19:47:06.8: ref_mag=15.54 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9866 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:11:51.38 +24:21:50.2: 15.55 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:13:56.71 +25:20:58.0: 15.34 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:56.71 +25:20:58.0: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1100 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:57:29.36 +25:47:08.6: 15.25 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:18:51.59 +21:22:30.0: 15.04 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:18:08.03 +21:49:03.4: 15.70 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:08.03 +21:49:03.4: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1052 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:22:49.79 +20:33:53.4: 15.64 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:11:51.38 +24:21:50.2: 15.34 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:51.38 +24:21:50.2: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0131 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:57:29.36 +25:47:08.6: 15.36 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:29.36 +25:47:08.6: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0541 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:42.54 +26:29:51.6: 15.18 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:18:51.59 +21:22:30.0: 14.86 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:51.59 +21:22:30.0: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0824 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:43.44 +26:45:22.9: 15.55 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:22:49.79 +20:33:53.4: 15.54 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:18:58.64 +19:28:52.8: 15.64 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.59 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:22:49.79 +20:33:53.4: ref_mag=15.59 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0151 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:42.54 +26:29:51.6: 15.34 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:42.54 +26:29:51.6: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1553 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:57:42.20 +20:46:11.2: 15.58 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:43.44 +26:45:22.9: 15.90 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.67 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:43.44 +26:45:22.9: ref_mag=15.67 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.0694 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:38.82 +27:01:57.6: 15.42 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:18:58.64 +19:28:52.8: 15.12 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:19:54.72 +24:33:44.8: 15.24 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:58.64 +19:28:52.8: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9578 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:17:35.18 +22:33:13.7: 15.59 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:57:42.20 +20:46:11.2: 15.52 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.54 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:42.20 +20:46:11.2: ref_mag=15.54 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9986 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:59.79 +21:08:06.0: 15.49 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:38.82 +27:01:57.6: 15.45 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:38.82 +27:01:57.6: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1775 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:19:54.72 +24:33:44.8: 15.72 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:19:54.72 +24:33:44.8: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1899 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:20:01.61 +20:27:46.0: 15.44 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:17:35.18 +22:33:13.7: 15.27 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:35.18 +22:33:13.7: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1399 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:27:35.69 +22:53:33.1: 15.21 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:59.79 +21:08:06.0: 15.50 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.49 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:59.79 +21:08:06.0: ref_mag=15.49 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0073 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:34.77 +22:42:12.4: 15.30 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:20:01.61 +20:27:46.0: 15.40 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:01.61 +20:27:46.0: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9700 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:19:04.68 +19:11:53.9: 15.06 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:27:35.69 +22:53:33.1: 15.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:27:35.69 +22:53:33.1: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1975 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:21:57.29 +21:31:40.8: 15.57 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:34.77 +22:42:12.4: 15.36 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:19:04.39 +17:57:36.5: 14.96 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:34.77 +22:42:12.4: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0739 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:24:59.85 +21:46:49.4: 15.45 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:57.14 +25:21:17.0: 15.47 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:19:04.68 +19:11:53.9: 15.57 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:22.86 +21:30:42.4: 15.22 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:19:04.68 +19:11:53.9: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0336 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:21:57.29 +21:31:40.8: 15.45 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:21:57.29 +21:31:40.8: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.2064 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:59:26.83 +25:50:21.2: 14.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:19:04.39 +17:57:36.5: 15.80 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:19:04.39 +17:57:36.5: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1021 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:24:59.85 +21:46:49.4: 15.79 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:24:59.85 +21:46:49.4: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9503 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:57.14 +25:21:17.0: 15.38 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:05.66 +23:45:24.9: 15.17 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:57.14 +25:21:17.0: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0258 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:22.86 +21:30:42.4: 15.14 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:22.86 +21:30:42.4: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0322 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:59:26.83 +25:50:21.2: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:26.83 +25:50:21.2: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9943 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:26.20 +17:15:35.6: 15.47 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:00:44.01 +26:08:16.0: 15.35 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:05.66 +23:45:24.9: 15.41 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:05.66 +23:45:24.9: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1710 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:32.54 +19:11:26.3: 15.19 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:26.20 +17:15:35.6: 15.32 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:26.20 +17:15:35.6: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9420 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:00:44.01 +26:08:16.0: 15.76 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:44.01 +26:08:16.0: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0798 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:32.54 +19:11:26.3: 15.21 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:32.54 +19:11:26.3: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8995 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87195.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87391.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87401.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87403.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87637.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87654.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87841.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87956.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88107.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88154.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88237.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 29s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86918_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 86918_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86920_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 86920_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86926_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 86926_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86943_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 86943_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86944_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 86944_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86945_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 86945_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86946_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 86946_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86947_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 86947_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86953_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 86953_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:56.84 +25:06:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86957_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 86957_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86962_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
Preparing report for the candidate 86962_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87024_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87024_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.59 +24:42:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87044_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87044_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:23.17 +24:32:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87072_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87072_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87129_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87129_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87136_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87136_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:29.51 +21:19:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87151_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87151_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87195_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
Preparing report for the candidate 87195_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87214_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87214_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87216_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87216_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87219_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87219_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87315_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87315_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87332_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87332_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87333_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87333_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:22.94 +26:10:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87334_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87334_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87340_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87340_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87371_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87371_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87391_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
Preparing report for the candidate 87391_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87401_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
Preparing report for the candidate 87401_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87403_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
Preparing report for the candidate 87403_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87432_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87432_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87474_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87474_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87510_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87510_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87524_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87524_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87533_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87533_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87541_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87541_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87550_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87550_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87559_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87559_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87567_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87567_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87571_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87571_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87596_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87596_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87605_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87605_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87611_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87611_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87612_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87612_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87623_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87623_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87637_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
Preparing report for the candidate 87637_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87642_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87642_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87643_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87643_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87654_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
Preparing report for the candidate 87654_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87665_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87665_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87667_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87667_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87683_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87683_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87690_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87690_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87692_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87692_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87697_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87697_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87698_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87698_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:52.59 +25:19:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87705_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87705_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87721_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87721_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87760_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87760_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87765_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87765_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87768_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87768_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87770_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87770_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87777_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87777_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:18.13 +26:26:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87819_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87819_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87823_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87823_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87841_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
Preparing report for the candidate 87841_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87849_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87849_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87872_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87872_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87910_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87910_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:51.23 +24:18:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87930_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87930_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87940_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87940_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87941_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87941_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87943_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87943_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87947_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87947_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87953_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87953_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87956_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
Preparing report for the candidate 87956_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87966_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87966_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87984_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87984_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87989_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87989_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87991_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 87991_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88000_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88000_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88032_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88032_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88050_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88050_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88064_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88064_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88067_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88067_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88092_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88092_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88094_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88094_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88107_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
Preparing report for the candidate 88107_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88115_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88115_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88127_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88127_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88128_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88128_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88129_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88129_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88147_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88147_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88153_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88153_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88154_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
Preparing report for the candidate 88154_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88165_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88165_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88168_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88168_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88169_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88169_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88177_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88177_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88178_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88178_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88203_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88203_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88211_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88211_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88237_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
Preparing report for the candidate 88237_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88246_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88246_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88247_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88247_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88251_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88251_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88267_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88267_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88284_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88284_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88287_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88287_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88288_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88288_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88292_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88292_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88296_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88296_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88323_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88323_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88325_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88325_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88333_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88333_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88340_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88340_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88341_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88341_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88342_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88342_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88344_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88344_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88351_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88351_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88365_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88365_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88366_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88366_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88378_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88378_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88391_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88391_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88396_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88396_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88405_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88405_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88417_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88417_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88433_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88433_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88440_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88440_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88450_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88450_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88451_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88451_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88453_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88453_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88457_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88457_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88460_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88460_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88462_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88462_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88463_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88463_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88467_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88467_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88474_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88474_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88482_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88482_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88483_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88483_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88488_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88488_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88495_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88495_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88496_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88496_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88501_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88501_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88507_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88507_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88509_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88509_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88517_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88517_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88523_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88523_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88531_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88531_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88568_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88568_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88580_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88580_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88582_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88582_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88588_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88588_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88590_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88590_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88609_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88609_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88610_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88610_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88615_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88615_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88658_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88658_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88679_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 88679_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88696_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
Preparing report for the candidate 88696_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64622_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 64622_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08199_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418
The candidate 08199_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418 did not pass the final checks
