This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3878 2461301.8878 11.81 07:41:21.51 +31:15:43.4
188.58674 23.64298 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia -0 0 0 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:41:21.51 +31:15:43.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:41:21.51 +31:15:43.4: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8878,11.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3878 11.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3878 2461301.8878 12.44 07:28:19.10 +32:42:25.4
186.13905 21.49244 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina -0 -0 0 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:28:19.10 +32:42:25.4: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:28:19.10 +32:42:25.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8878,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3878 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3878 2461301.8878 13.36 07:41:36.98 +29:32:14.7
190.38514 23.13994 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.141 Lumen -0 -1 1 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:41:36.98 +29:32:14.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:41:36.98 +29:32:14.7: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8878,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3878 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3878 2461301.8878 13.42 08:11:47.47 +25:47:34.6
196.69628 28.27057 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.423 Diotima -1 0 1 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:11:47.47 +25:47:34.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:11:47.47 +25:47:34.6: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8878,13.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3878 13.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
YZ Cnc,2461301.8878,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
YZ Cnc 20260918.3878 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
First image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Last image: 2461301.88810970 18.09.2026 09:18:42.678 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14035
Objects passed selection criteria: 14012
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11762
Average stars matched: 11487 (97.662 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239288 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 04:21:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
First image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Last image: 2461301.88810970 18.09.2026 09:18:42.678 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 97
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.17
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 78635
Objects passed selection criteria: 78446
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 65138.8
Average stars matched: 63016.5 (96.742 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 542408 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 04:22:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461301.88752541
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Image size: 943.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:45.159 +30:00:13.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89
Second-epoch image center 07:59:45.159 +30:00:13.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0871 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Image size: 943.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:42.685 +30:00:46.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89
Second-epoch image center 07:59:42.685 +30:00:46.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0934 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:59:45.159 +30:00:13.14
Second-epoch second image center 07:59:42.685 +30:00:46.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01278 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xeq3xIzHmw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EWB8B992fE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bfa7udMQDK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CvRjoLHip0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6187 to 129.5943 deg, Dec +24.4211 to +35.3033 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6187 to 129.5943 deg, Dec 24.4211 to 35.3033 deg
Loaded 9471 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7174 out of 7671 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7671 out of 14578 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.914800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.914800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6187 to 129.5943 deg, Dec +24.4211 to +35.3033 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6187 to 129.5943 deg, Dec 24.4211 to 35.3033 deg
Loaded 9471 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7174 out of 7671 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7671 out of 14578 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6179 to 129.5933 deg, Dec +24.4235 to +35.3042 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6179 to 129.5933 deg, Dec 24.4235 to 35.3042 deg
Loaded 9472 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7195 out of 7687 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7687 out of 14611 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.3 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
3.0 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
3.0 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.xeq3xIzHmw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1032, bad_region=0, passed=14578
Got 14578 stars (including 13536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.451 n_q1=1067 n_q2=1401 n_q3=1039 n_q4=1382 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.321
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.EWB8B992fE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1022, bad_region=1, passed=14611
Got 14611 stars (including 13579 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.449 n_q1=1074 n_q2=1399 n_q3=1031 n_q4=1386 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bfa7udMQDK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=418, bad_region=0, passed=9066
Got 9066 stars (including 8638 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9066 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013099 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010479 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=7.944 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.827 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.388 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.416 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.316 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.361 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=0.953 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.310 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.316 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.351 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.361
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.351 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=1476 n_q2=921 n_q3=1506 n_q4=968 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CvRjoLHip0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=415, bad_region=0, passed=9094
Got 9094 stars (including 8669 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9094 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013097 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010478 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=7.962 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.032 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.418 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.444 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.337 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.395 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=0.951 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.302 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.337 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.344 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.395
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.344 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=1472 n_q2=926 n_q3=1504 n_q4=971 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits sigma_overall=0.422 worst_q_ratio=1.321
ref2=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits sigma_overall=0.429 worst_q_ratio=1.290
new1=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits sigma_overall=0.312 worst_q_ratio=1.144
new2=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits sigma_overall=0.310 worst_q_ratio=1.103
reference average sigma_overall=0.4255 worst_q_ratio=1.3055
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124_astrometric_residuals.png (4889 matched stars from wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405_astrometric_residuals.png (4871 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:41:21.51 +31:15:43.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:25:43.98 +34:38:23.9: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:25:43.98 +34:38:23.9: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:41:21.51 +31:15:43.4: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:43.98 +34:38:23.9: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2048 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20984.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20775_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 20775_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:47.66 +27:35:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20776_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 20776_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20811_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 20811_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:27.53 +30:46:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20887_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 20887_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:56.03 +31:10:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20903_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 20903_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:43.97 +34:13:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20917_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 20917_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:07.12 +34:13:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20984_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
Preparing report for the candidate 20984_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09774_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 09774_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:33.45 +28:05:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01020_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 01020_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:11.73 +34:28:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02413_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 02413_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.89 +33:22:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:41:21.51 +31:15:43.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Image size: 943.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:45.159 +30:00:13.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89
Second-epoch image center 07:59:45.159 +30:00:13.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0871 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Image size: 943.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:42.685 +30:00:46.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89
Second-epoch image center 07:59:42.685 +30:00:46.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0934 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:59:45.159 +30:00:13.14
Second-epoch second image center 07:59:42.685 +30:00:46.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01278 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4ickdi7Zur
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J7idK6qIhv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UtLfU5fMhF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits &> /tmp/tmp.10PHKQHbzK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6080 to 129.6441 deg, Dec +24.4211 to +35.3078 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6080 to 129.6441 deg, Dec 24.4211 to 35.3078 deg
Loaded 9497 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6453 out of 7790 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7790 out of 84052 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.787800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.787800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.17
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6080 to 129.6441 deg, Dec +24.4211 to +35.3078 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6080 to 129.6441 deg, Dec 24.4211 to 35.3078 deg
Loaded 9497 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6453 out of 7790 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7790 out of 84052 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 84140 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6079 to 129.6139 deg, Dec +24.4235 to +35.3111 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6079 to 129.6139 deg, Dec 24.4235 to 35.3111 deg
Loaded 9490 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6470 out of 7805 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7805 out of 84140 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 86 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.1 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.9 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
2.9 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4ickdi7Zur (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=6475, bad_region=0, passed=84011
Got 84011 stars (including 77428 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84011 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=1104 n_q2=1426 n_q3=997 n_q4=1356 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.302
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.J7idK6qIhv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=6514, bad_region=3, passed=84099
Got 84099 stars (including 77494 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84099 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4887 stars left (next iteration limit 5375)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits N_match=4887 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.438 n_q1=1110 n_q2=1424 n_q3=996 n_q4=1357 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.UtLfU5fMhF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2036, bad_region=28, passed=46987
Got 46987 stars (including 44873 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46987 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013099 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010479 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4868 stars left (next iteration limit 5354)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4868 robust_rms=7.874 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.147 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4868 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.419 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4868 robust_rms=0.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.364 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4868 robust_rms_before=0.955 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.340 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.364
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.340 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits N_match=4868 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1459 n_q2=889 n_q3=1534 n_q4=986 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.10PHKQHbzK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2055, bad_region=29, passed=47485
Got 47485 stars (including 45327 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47485 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013097 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010478 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5355)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=7.799 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.858 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.417 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.445 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.334 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.398 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4869 robust_rms_before=0.947 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.298 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.334 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.341 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.398
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.341 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=1466 n_q2=897 n_q3=1533 n_q4=973 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_041920_TTUQ1b1x1_402150_Z42oQNwb/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:26:48.79 +34:11:11.1: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:27:03.34 +35:04:45.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:24:15.91 +31:51:01.5: 14.39 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:29:47.57 +34:28:45.7: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:25:12.75 +33:12:32.7: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:24:55.12 +34:16:01.4: 14.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:25:37.90 +33:30:54.7: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:03:55.18 +25:03:02.8: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:27:17.31 +29:11:21.2: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:26:48.79 +34:11:11.1: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:29:47.57 +34:28:45.7: 14.41 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:25:37.90 +33:30:54.7: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:24:15.91 +31:51:01.5: 14.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:27:03.34 +35:04:45.0: 14.30 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:24:55.12 +34:16:01.4: 14.36 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:25:12.75 +33:12:32.7: 14.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:03.34 +35:04:45.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:48.79 +34:11:11.1: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8968 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:47.57 +34:28:45.7: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0843 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:15.91 +31:51:01.5: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3018 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:37.90 +33:30:54.7: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9446 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:55.12 +34:16:01.4: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1965 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:12.75 +33:12:32.7: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0911 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:03:55.18 +25:03:02.8: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:27:17.31 +29:11:21.2: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:03:55.18 +25:03:02.8: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1978 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:17.31 +29:11:21.2: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7733 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:25:35.51 +29:29:32.1: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:28:19.10 +32:42:25.4: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:25:35.51 +29:29:32.1: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:35.51 +29:29:32.1: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0742 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:15:44.97 +31:46:25.2: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:28:19.10 +32:42:25.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:26:19.53 +33:17:37.3: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:31:47.15 +26:13:16.0: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:41:36.98 +29:32:14.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:15:44.97 +31:46:25.2: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:15:44.97 +31:46:25.2: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3492 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:26:19.53 +33:17:37.3: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:31:47.15 +26:13:16.0: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:19.53 +33:17:37.3: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4203 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:47.15 +26:13:16.0: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2551 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:41:36.98 +29:32:14.7: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:31:37.65 +34:12:15.8: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:28:12.33 +33:29:29.1: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:11:47.47 +25:47:34.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:31:37.65 +34:12:15.8: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:37.65 +34:12:15.8: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6386 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:28:12.33 +33:29:29.1: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:12.33 +33:29:29.1: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7449 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:55:52.90 +34:21:59.1: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:23:51.88 +34:57:28.0: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:24:01.78 +33:51:44.3: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:11:47.47 +25:47:34.6: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:55:52.90 +34:21:59.1: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:55:52.90 +34:21:59.1: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7649 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:23:51.88 +34:57:28.0: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:24:01.78 +33:51:44.3: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:51.88 +34:57:28.0: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7650 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:01.78 +33:51:44.3: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0976 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:28:29.57 +34:55:08.8: 14.64 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:24:05.20 +33:23:00.1: 14.39 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:24:00.37 +33:33:15.4: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:25:29.48 +34:01:32.3: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:28:29.57 +34:55:08.8: 14.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:29.57 +34:55:08.8: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2107 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:43:11.29 +31:15:03.6: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:54:53.40 +30:47:34.0: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:24:03.02 +32:49:02.3: 15.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:24:05.20 +33:23:00.1: 14.30 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:05.20 +33:23:00.1: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1735 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:24:00.37 +33:33:15.4: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:25:29.48 +34:01:32.3: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:00.37 +33:33:15.4: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1393 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:29.48 +34:01:32.3: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3395 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:43:11.29 +31:15:03.6: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:43:11.29 +31:15:03.6: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0856 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:54:53.40 +30:47:34.0: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:54:53.40 +30:47:34.0: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2812 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:24:03.02 +32:49:02.3: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:03.02 +32:49:02.3: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7755 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out100873.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101299.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101550.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100504_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100504_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100505_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100505_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100511_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100511_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:11:47.35 +34:16:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100513_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100513_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100515_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100515_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100516_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100516_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100518_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100518_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:21.13 +30:58:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100521_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100521_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:06.35 +26:29:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100522_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100522_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100523_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100523_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100526_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100526_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100530_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100530_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100533_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100533_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:11.99 +31:29:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100534_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100534_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:29.95 +34:51:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100535_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100535_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:13.65 +34:16:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100536_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100536_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100537_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100537_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:50.27 +31:33:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100538_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100538_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100540_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100540_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:00.42 +34:23:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100542_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100542_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:47.68 +27:35:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100543_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100543_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:29.08 +27:36:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100590_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100590_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:39.74 +27:22:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100655_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100655_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:52.09 +31:52:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100659_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100659_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:56.04 +31:10:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100678_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100678_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:43.97 +34:13:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100692_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100692_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:07.08 +34:13:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100756_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100756_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:21.52 +31:15:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100845_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100845_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.73 +25:46:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100873_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
Preparing report for the candidate 100873_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100880_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100880_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:37.11 +26:45:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100886_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100886_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:00.28 +26:26:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100937_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100937_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:14.21 +33:29:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100941_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100941_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.34 +25:56:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100964_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100964_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100987_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 100987_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:12.79 +29:49:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101026_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101026_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:26.93 +29:02:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101030_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101030_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:52.50 +27:05:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101041_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101041_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:50.78 +34:00:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101093_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101093_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.13 +32:21:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101196_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101196_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:08.87 +34:08:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101221_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101221_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:34.42 +27:12:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101225_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101225_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:47.12 +34:14:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101248_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101248_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:32.53 +33:26:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101268_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101268_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101271_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101271_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:16.04 +33:29:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101272_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101272_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101299_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
Preparing report for the candidate 101299_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101337_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101337_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:10.47 +29:28:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101406_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101406_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:12.20 +27:54:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101414_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101414_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:22.54 +25:02:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101428_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101428_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:16:55.89 +30:20:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101429_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101429_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.36 +25:10:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101433_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101433_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:42.90 +30:53:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101443_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101443_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:24:58.60 +28:34:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101453_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101453_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101469_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101469_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101496_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101496_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:06.07 +33:23:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101507_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101507_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:46.78 +28:49:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101523_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101523_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:33.95 +34:37:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101533_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101533_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:01.08 +34:55:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101550_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
Preparing report for the candidate 101550_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101633_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101633_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101643_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101643_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101714_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101714_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:10.53 +34:18:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101733_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101733_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101741_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101741_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:38.26 +32:25:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101749_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101749_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:51.61 +30:13:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101755_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101755_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:06.86 +27:56:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101759_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101759_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:30.60 +32:29:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101785_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101785_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:30.01 +27:51:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101796_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101796_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101816_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101816_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:10.56 +32:11:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101817_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101817_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101833_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101833_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101879_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101879_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101926_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101926_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101995_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 101995_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102062_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 102062_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75290_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 75290_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:23.94 +27:19:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:27.52 +30:46:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78757_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 78757_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29915_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 29915_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:18:27.48 +31:08:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80658_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 80658_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:33.49 +28:05:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81502_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
Preparing report for the candidate 81502_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04889_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 04889_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:11.73 +34:28:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11699_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 11699_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-18-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
