This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3866 2461301.8866 11.69 06:38:18.31 +25:43:30.2
188.43485 8.74299 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope -0 0 0 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:38:18.31 +25:43:30.2: 15.39 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:38:18.31 +25:43:30.2: 15.59 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.21
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8866,11.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3866 11.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3866 2461301.8866 11.87 07:21:08.21 +30:28:12.2
187.82309 19.28991 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.115 Thyra -0 -0 0 12.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:21:08.21 +30:28:12.2: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:21:08.21 +30:28:12.2: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8866,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3866 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3866 2461301.8866 12.48 07:28:19.00 +32:42:25.3
186.13895 21.49210 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina 0 -0 0 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:28:19.00 +32:42:25.3: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:28:19.00 +32:42:25.3: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8866,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3866 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3866 2461301.8866 13.33 06:50:12.20 +32:11:31.8
183.56329 13.82003 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.702 Alauda 0 -0 0 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:50:12.20 +32:11:31.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:50:12.20 +32:11:31.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8866,13.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3866 13.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3866 2461301.8866 14.25 07:09:16.45 +30:46:36.9
186.54573 17.02412 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.152 Atala 1 0 1 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:09:16.45 +30:46:36.9: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:09:16.45 +30:46:36.9: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8866,14.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3866 14.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3866 2461301.8866 13.57 06:37:01.96 +32:57:47.4
181.67448 11.60695 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.172 Baucis 0 -1 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:37:01.96 +32:57:47.4: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:37:01.96 +32:57:47.4: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8866,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3866 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461301.88697272 18.09.2026 09:17:04.443 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 30
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24039
Objects passed selection criteria: 24015
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 21685.5
Average stars matched: 21031.5 (96.9842 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 247236 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 04:20:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461301.88697272 18.09.2026 09:17:04.443 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 150
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 68 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 157651
Objects passed selection criteria: 157323
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 136117
Average stars matched: 131032 (96.2641 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 617408 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 04:22:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461301.88627784
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:41.272 +30:00:24.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 06:59:41.272 +30:00:24.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0698 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:44.162 +29:59:43.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 06:59:44.162 +29:59:43.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0584 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:59:41.272 +30:00:24.94
Second-epoch second image center 06:59:44.162 +29:59:43.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01544 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jN75Rpm8jd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jPCdfsPF4r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lAxFkNQdB6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8Xlhfbktnu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11975 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.910000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.910000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11975 out of 24243 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec +24.1920 to +35.3691 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec 24.1920 to 35.3691 deg
Loaded 15195 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10824 out of 11955 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11955 out of 24037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 29 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
3.0 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
3.0 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.jN75Rpm8jd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, bad_region=0, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 21925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5256)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=1413 n_q2=1099 n_q3=1188 n_q4=1079 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jPCdfsPF4r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, bad_region=0, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 21723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1411 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1181 n_q4=1087 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lAxFkNQdB6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1121, bad_region=0, passed=19471
Got 19471 stars (including 18335 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19471 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19471 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4829 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19471 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19471 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4771 stars left (next iteration limit 5250)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=8.775 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.494 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.338 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.343 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.280 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.316 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4771 robust_rms_before=0.853 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.335 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.280 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.396 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.316
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:41.266 +30:00:24.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 19471 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky365354.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.853 -> 0.280 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4771 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4579 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4579 pairs (4771 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4579 robust_rms=8.348 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.937 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4579 robust_rms=0.332 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.340 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4579 robust_rms=0.274 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.316 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4579 robust_rms_before=0.277 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.277 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.274 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.314 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.316
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-quadrant 0.316 vs 0.314 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4579 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19471 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4579 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19471 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits N_match=4579 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1443 n_q2=944 n_q3=1240 n_q4=952 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8Xlhfbktnu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1162, bad_region=1, passed=19554
Got 19554 stars (including 18370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19554 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4829 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4772 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4771 stars left (next iteration limit 5245)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=8.847 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.266 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.333 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.351 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.282 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.323 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4771 robust_rms_before=0.888 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.345 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.282 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.404 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.323
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:44.157 +29:59:43.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 19554 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky365363.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.888 -> 0.282 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4771 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4578 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4578 pairs (4771 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4578 robust_rms=8.367 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.712 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4578 robust_rms=0.327 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.352 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4578 robust_rms=0.279 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.320 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4578 robust_rms_before=0.279 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.279 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.279 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.319 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.320
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-quadrant 0.320 vs 0.319 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4578 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4578 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits N_match=4578 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.272 n_q1=1449 n_q2=956 n_q3=1224 n_q4=949 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.284
ref2=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.238
new1=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits sigma_overall=0.295 worst_q_ratio=1.119
new2=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits sigma_overall=0.295 worst_q_ratio=1.169
reference average sigma_overall=0.3745 worst_q_ratio=1.261
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226_astrometric_residuals.png (4779 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227_astrometric_residuals.png (4781 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403_astrometric_residuals.png (4579 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.21 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404_astrometric_residuals.png (4578 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.21 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:38:18.31 +25:43:30.2: 15.39 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:07:07.96 +29:06:03.2: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:41:39.74 +28:17:47.7: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:32:34.65 +27:57:02.4: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:42:07.25 +31:25:12.9: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:21:08.21 +30:28:12.2: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:36:13.26 +31:05:34.7: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:38:18.31 +25:43:30.2: 15.59 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:41:39.74 +28:17:47.7: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:07:07.96 +29:06:03.2: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:46:09.18 +29:36:28.3: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:55:48.30 +27:13:09.8: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:38:18.31 +25:43:30.2: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=11.6862 delta=3.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:39.74 +28:17:47.7: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8830 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:07.96 +29:06:03.2: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3550 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:21:08.21 +30:28:12.2: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:42:07.25 +31:25:12.9: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:36:13.26 +31:05:34.7: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:32:34.65 +27:57:02.4: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:07.25 +31:25:12.9: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2737 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:13.26 +31:05:34.7: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3870 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:34.65 +27:57:02.4: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3081 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:38:57.02 +27:03:44.7: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:46:09.18 +29:36:28.3: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:09.18 +29:36:28.3: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3633 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:55:48.30 +27:13:09.8: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:48.30 +27:13:09.8: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3364 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:51:10.54 +29:26:31.4: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:48:06.95 +28:21:45.3: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:38:57.02 +27:03:44.7: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:57.02 +27:03:44.7: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4302 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:52:28.58 +28:26:24.5: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:52:51.56 +28:43:57.0: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:51:10.54 +29:26:31.4: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:48:06.95 +28:21:45.3: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:10.54 +29:26:31.4: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3787 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:48:06.95 +28:21:45.3: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3812 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:52:28.58 +28:26:24.5: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:52:51.56 +28:43:57.0: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:28.58 +28:26:24.5: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3464 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:51.56 +28:43:57.0: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3805 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31863.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32072.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31381_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 31381_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31384_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 31384_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:32.62 +33:21:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31386_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 31386_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:05.49 +29:10:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31387_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 31387_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:40.86 +27:59:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31437_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 31437_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:04.59 +25:21:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31751_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 31751_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.60 +31:35:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31840_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 31840_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:42.44 +33:55:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31863_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
Preparing report for the candidate 31863_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31875_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 31875_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.62 +33:41:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31976_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 31976_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32072_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
Preparing report for the candidate 32072_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32085_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 32085_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:16.15 +26:57:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32169_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 32169_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32174_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 32174_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32183_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 32183_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:58.17 +26:55:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32231_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 32231_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32235_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 32235_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:34.12 +28:18:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32256_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 32256_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:01.50 +31:08:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32264_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 32264_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32266_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 32266_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32268_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 32268_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32271_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 32271_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32288_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 32288_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32301_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 32301_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32325_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 32325_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.26 +27:57:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.33 +33:22:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.01 +25:59:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.12 +30:16:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:38:18.31 +25:43:30.2
07:21:08.21 +30:28:12.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:41.266 +30:00:24.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 06:59:41.266 +30:00:24.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0697 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:44.157 +29:59:43.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 06:59:44.157 +29:59:43.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0584 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:59:41.266 +30:00:24.14
Second-epoch second image center 06:59:44.157 +29:59:43.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01545 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RDCDppphyw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OoHJQVdT4e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1qK3dVJAJs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U5YiZVTbVW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.776200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.776200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 166985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3760 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3760 deg
Loaded 15290 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8659 out of 12225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12225 out of 166985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 145 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.9 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
2.9 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.RDCDppphyw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=20873, bad_region=1, passed=167489
Got 167489 stars (including 146337 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4800 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4801 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4765 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4765 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1316 n_q2=1150 n_q3=1167 n_q4=1132 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OoHJQVdT4e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20907, bad_region=3, passed=166934
Got 166934 stars (including 145737 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166934 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4797 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4764 stars left (next iteration limit 5241)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4764 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1335 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1157 n_q4=1131 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.301
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1qK3dVJAJs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=9087, bad_region=32, passed=106159
Got 106159 stars (including 96913 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 106159 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 106159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 106159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 106159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4767 stars left (next iteration limit 5243)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=9.201 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.944 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.360 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.282 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.317 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4767 robust_rms_before=0.282 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.329 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.282 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.313 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.317
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.313 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits N_match=4767 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=1510 n_q2=963 n_q3=1265 n_q4=1029 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.U5YiZVTbVW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=9323, bad_region=37, passed=107095
Got 107095 stars (including 97625 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 107095 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4767 stars left (next iteration limit 5243)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=9.122 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.552 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.340 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.355 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.286 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.322 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4767 robust_rms_before=0.283 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.324 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.286 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.317 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.322
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.317 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits N_match=4767 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=1499 n_q2=972 n_q3=1256 n_q4=1040 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-16-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_041748_TTUQ1b1x1_216284_9gFIhvpG/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:14:29.47 +29:52:32.2: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:54:55.10 +29:52:49.1: 14.56 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:57:12.22 +27:38:35.1: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:43:57.10 +31:24:53.0: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:32:26.68 +28:45:50.4: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:27:43.02 +28:57:44.2: 14.33 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:31:06.79 +25:46:49.6: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:27:26.89 +29:04:45.8: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:57:12.22 +27:38:35.1: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:14:29.47 +29:52:32.2: 14.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:32:26.68 +28:45:50.4: 14.44 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:43:57.10 +31:24:53.0: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:54:55.10 +29:52:49.1: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:27:43.02 +28:57:44.2: 14.37 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:29.47 +29:52:32.2: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2501 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:26.68 +28:45:50.4: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3370 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:12.22 +27:38:35.1: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8554 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:57.10 +31:24:53.0: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2859 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:55.10 +29:52:49.1: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4853 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:43.02 +28:57:44.2: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4883 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:31:06.79 +25:46:49.6: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:06.79 +25:46:49.6: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2803 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:27:26.89 +29:04:45.8: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:26.89 +29:04:45.8: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9337 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:31:17.47 +27:30:48.5: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:32:34.18 +28:05:40.2: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:37:31.46 +31:03:04.7: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:43:16.28 +27:00:04.9: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:37:31.46 +31:03:04.7: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:32:34.18 +28:05:40.2: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:31:17.47 +27:30:48.5: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:31.46 +31:03:04.7: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5191 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:34.18 +28:05:40.2: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4365 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:17.47 +27:30:48.5: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3139 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:43:16.28 +27:00:04.9: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:16.28 +27:00:04.9: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8075 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:28:19.00 +32:42:25.3: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:37:16.93 +30:56:08.2: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:28:19.00 +32:42:25.3: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:37:16.93 +30:56:08.2: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:16.93 +30:56:08.2: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0031 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:50:12.20 +32:11:31.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:50:12.20 +32:11:31.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:25:07.46 +27:05:55.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:25:07.46 +27:05:55.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:07.46 +27:05:55.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:45:05.65 +30:05:47.7: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:41:42.86 +29:59:52.1: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:45:05.65 +30:05:47.7: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:05.65 +30:05:47.7: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8812 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:21:14.09 +34:42:46.6: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:41:42.86 +29:59:52.1: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:42.86 +29:59:52.1: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8843 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:21:14.09 +34:42:46.6: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:14.09 +34:42:46.6: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8024 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:33:39.70 +29:56:27.1: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:29:42.93 +34:32:25.0: 14.32 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:33:39.70 +29:56:27.1: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:39.70 +29:56:27.1: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2538 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:09:16.45 +30:46:36.9: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:29:42.93 +34:32:25.0: 14.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:42.93 +34:32:25.0: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2724 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:09:16.45 +30:46:36.9: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:37:01.96 +32:57:47.4: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:37:01.96 +32:57:47.4: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out127363.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193169.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193935.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196384.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191901_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191901_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:25.17 +30:58:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191912_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191912_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191914_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191914_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191916_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191916_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191930_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191930_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:02.85 +34:47:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191932_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191932_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191933_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191933_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:29.84 +32:45:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191935_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191935_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191937_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191937_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:21.16 +30:58:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191941_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191941_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191951_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191951_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:19.24 +30:40:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191953_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191953_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191955_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191955_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191958_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191958_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191961_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191961_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:32.37 +34:46:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191964_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191964_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:24.57 +31:50:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191965_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191965_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191967_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191967_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:49.06 +25:37:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191969_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191969_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191970_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191970_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:18.06 +34:18:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191971_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191971_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.91 +31:14:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191974_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191974_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191975_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191975_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:24.50 +26:26:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191977_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191977_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191979_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191979_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191980_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 191980_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:23.53 +26:48:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192031_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 192031_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:04.51 +25:21:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192098_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 192098_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:20.58 +24:47:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192671_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 192671_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:08.21 +30:28:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192681_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 192681_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:54.52 +27:49:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192929_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 192929_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:17.75 +27:48:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192952_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 192952_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:39.21 +27:38:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193050_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 193050_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:51.07 +32:48:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193169_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
Preparing report for the candidate 193169_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193348_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 193348_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:15.60 +27:12:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193440_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 193440_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193549_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 193549_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:47.23 +27:58:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193568_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 193568_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:04.70 +27:12:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193580_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 193580_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:47.85 +25:27:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193614_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 193614_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:23.35 +26:08:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193627_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 193627_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:49.29 +32:38:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193700_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 193700_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:56.95 +30:18:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193714_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 193714_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:13.29 +26:25:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193844_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 193844_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:08.21 +33:08:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193894_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 193894_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.11 +32:21:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193935_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
Preparing report for the candidate 193935_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194011_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194011_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:23.04 +33:20:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194024_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194024_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:13.68 +28:32:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194040_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194040_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:31.34 +30:38:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194051_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194051_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:35.14 +31:07:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194070_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194070_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:47.01 +34:14:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:36.70 +30:31:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194086_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194086_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.63 +30:33:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194217_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194217_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:05.28 +29:15:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194227_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194227_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:17.86 +25:23:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194283_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194283_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:08.91 +34:08:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194313_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194313_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:46.60 +26:19:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194352_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194352_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:11.93 +26:58:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194400_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194400_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:20.97 +30:56:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194411_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194411_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:39.20 +26:48:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194426_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194426_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:09.24 +27:46:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194493_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194493_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:03.16 +27:02:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194500_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194500_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:18.53 +30:22:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194514_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194514_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:06.96 +25:19:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194525_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194525_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:16.01 +30:26:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194576_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194576_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:07.78 +34:17:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194583_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194583_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:47.28 +34:48:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194589_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194589_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.26 +26:04:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194626_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194626_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:49.01 +25:18:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194644_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194644_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.55 +28:12:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194667_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194667_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:02.99 +25:10:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194668_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194668_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:48.77 +34:16:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194670_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194670_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:38.45 +25:05:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194727_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194727_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:57.34 +32:46:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194786_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194786_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:58.43 +26:59:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194788_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194788_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:25.62 +24:59:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194796_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194796_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:41.03 +32:38:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194800_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194800_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:28.52 +25:50:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194813_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194813_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:16.06 +34:57:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194845_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194845_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194847_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194847_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:15.31 +33:42:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194850_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194850_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:43.82 +25:38:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194889_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194889_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.66 +26:19:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194909_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194909_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:12.92 +30:35:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194965_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194965_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:53.53 +26:47:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194973_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194973_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:32.02 +28:17:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194994_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 194994_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:57.91 +32:57:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195025_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195025_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:51.79 +27:10:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195047_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195047_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195067_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195067_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:49.28 +33:27:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195137_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195137_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:09.26 +33:22:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195159_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195159_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:30.83 +32:10:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195212_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195212_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:41.35 +27:39:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195249_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195249_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:30.80 +32:10:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195267_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195267_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:54.00 +31:29:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195334_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195334_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195361_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195361_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195362_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195362_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:39.67 +28:14:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195377_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195377_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:58.66 +27:40:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195398_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195398_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:18.94 +29:12:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195437_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195437_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:45.98 +32:32:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195438_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195438_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:57.67 +30:51:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195462_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195462_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:17.81 +27:15:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195492_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195492_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:15.81 +25:49:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195563_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195563_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:50.10 +33:34:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195579_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195579_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:53.50 +34:09:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195582_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195582_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:55.07 +25:13:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195585_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195585_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:20.35 +34:50:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195607_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195607_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:14.88 +31:35:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:56.74 +27:21:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195641_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195641_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:33.50 +26:31:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195644_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195644_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:15.57 +29:56:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195685_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195685_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:41.60 +30:10:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195700_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195700_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:53.37 +31:36:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195702_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195702_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:44.09 +31:28:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195734_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195734_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:27.90 +30:58:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195795_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195795_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195890_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195890_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:07.77 +28:35:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195892_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195892_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:07.90 +32:34:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195918_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 195918_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:50.80 +25:33:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196025_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 196025_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:58.46 +32:48:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196083_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 196083_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:04.31 +28:25:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196102_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 196102_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:46.45 +28:54:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196144_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 196144_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196172_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 196172_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:12.21 +29:40:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196206_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 196206_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:25.10 +28:57:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196212_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 196212_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:18.77 +33:02:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196377_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 196377_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:43.82 +29:20:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196384_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
Preparing report for the candidate 196384_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196579_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 196579_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:17.65 +31:05:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196754_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 196754_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:38.59 +29:27:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127363_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
Preparing report for the candidate 127363_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130975_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 130975_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:20.08 +32:56:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58256_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 58256_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:05.12 +27:46:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.62 +31:35:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.38 +26:47:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59889_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 59889_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:54.60 +27:45:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:20.82 +27:15:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109209_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 109209_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:01.54 +31:01:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.29 +33:22:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.01 +25:59:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21982_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 21982_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:18.33 +25:43:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.11 +30:16:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.24 +27:57:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84162_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404
The candidate 84162_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-17-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404 did not pass the final checks
