This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3014 2461301.8014 8.69 00:28:51.97 +08:19:27.7
113.37454 -54.12800 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 10.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.192 Nausikaa 0 1 1 8.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:28:51.97 +08:19:27.7: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:28:51.97 +08:19:27.7: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8014,8.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3014 8.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3014 2461301.8014 13.41 00:27:29.33 +08:08:32.1
112.75106 -54.25541 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 10.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.577 Rhea -0 0 0 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:27:29.33 +08:08:32.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:27:29.33 +08:08:32.1: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8014,13.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3014 13.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3014 2461301.8014 13.43 00:14:07.09 +01:28:15.6
104.00570 -60.02226 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 10.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.551 Ortrud 0 -1 1 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:14:07.09 +01:28:15.6: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:14:07.09 +01:28:15.6: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8014,13.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3014 13.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3014 2461301.8014 13.89 00:09:16.08 +10:56:40.4
106.50013 -50.57690 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 10.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.701 Oriola 0 1 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:09:16.08 +10:56:40.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:09:16.08 +10:56:40.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8014,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3014 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3014 2461301.8014 14.29 23:49:40.88 +09:00:59.0
98.30529 -50.87863 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 10.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1756 Giacobini -0 0 0 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:49:40.88 +09:00:59.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:49:40.88 +09:00:59.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8014,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3014 14.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3014 2461301.8014 14.29 23:32:00.42 +09:41:34.5
92.61401 -48.44729 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 10.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1151 Ithaka -1 0 1 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:32:00.42 +09:41:34.5: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:32:00.42 +09:41:34.5: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8014,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3014 14.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3014 2461301.8014 14.70 23:59:48.60 +00:58:54.6
97.01749 -59.26731 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 11.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2378 Pannekoek -1 -1 1 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:59:48.60 +00:58:54.6: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:59:48.60 +00:58:54.6: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8014,14.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3014 14.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90183583 21.07.2026 09:38:28.616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
First image: 2461242.90183583 21.07.2026 09:38:28.616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Last image: 2461301.80166345 18.09.2026 07:14:13.722 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.44
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7063
Objects passed selection criteria: 7058
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6757.75
Average stars matched: 6318.75 (93.5038 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233152 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 02:19:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90183583 21.07.2026 09:38:28.616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
First image: 2461242.90183583 21.07.2026 09:38:28.616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Last image: 2461301.80166345 18.09.2026 07:14:13.722 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 138
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 36098
Objects passed selection criteria: 36029
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 35025
Average stars matched: 32927.5 (94.0114 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 257648 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 02:20:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461301.80104233
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:51.257 +05:59:16.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82
Second-epoch image center 23:59:51.257 +05:59:16.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0295 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:54.461 +05:58:35.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.228 +05:59:38.82
Second-epoch image center 23:59:54.461 +05:58:35.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0235 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:51.257 +05:59:16.52
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:54.461 +05:58:35.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01746 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C6Q5BnRcVZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4XdH5VBxdH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w7vMD0MwyO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OlesStjWlo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 6233 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.0271 to 7.9045 deg, Dec +0.6902 to +11.2647 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.0271 to 7.9045 deg, Dec 0.6902 to 11.2647 deg
Loaded 4566 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3722 out of 3826 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3826 out of 6233 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.662650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.662650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.44
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 6233 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.0271 to 7.9045 deg, Dec +0.6902 to +11.2647 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.0271 to 7.9045 deg, Dec 0.6902 to 11.2647 deg
Loaded 4566 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3722 out of 3826 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3826 out of 6233 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (aperture=6.4)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 6318 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.8996 to 8.2591 deg, Dec +0.3478 to +11.6137 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.8996 to 8.2591 deg, Dec 0.3478 to 11.6137 deg
Loaded 4984 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3763 out of 3845 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3845 out of 6318 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
2.4 pix Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
2.5 pix fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
2.5 pix fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
15.2 mag. Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.C6Q5BnRcVZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, bad_region=0, passed=6233
Got 6233 stars (including 5867 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6233 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0271 through 0 to 7.9045, gap 7.9045 to 352.0271
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0274 through 0 to 7.9045, gap 7.9045 to 352.0274
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1279 n_q2=1239 n_q3=1222 n_q4=1157 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits -region wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4XdH5VBxdH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=328, bad_region=0, passed=6318
Got 6318 stars (including 5982 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8996 through 0 to 8.2591, gap 8.2591 to 351.8996
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8998 through 0 to 8.2592, gap 8.2592 to 351.8998
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=1292 n_q2=1193 n_q3=1278 n_q4=1129 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -region wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.w7vMD0MwyO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=374, bad_region=0, passed=7305
Got 7305 stars (including 6920 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7305 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8458 through 0 to 8.2100, gap 8.2100 to 351.8458
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7305 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8455 through 0 to 8.2106, gap 8.2106 to 351.8455
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7305 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7305 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=11.410 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.667 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=0.323 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.333 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=0.237 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.258 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4891 robust_rms_before=0.916 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.245 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.237 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.268 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.258
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.268 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.229 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.234 n_q1=1183 n_q2=1216 n_q3=1244 n_q4=1248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OlesStjWlo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=397, bad_region=0, passed=7323
Got 7323 stars (including 6915 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7323 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8754 through 0 to 8.2370, gap 8.2370 to 351.8754
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7323 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8750 through 0 to 8.2375, gap 8.2375 to 351.8750
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7323 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7323 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=11.475 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.765 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.360 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=0.260 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.277 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4894 robust_rms_before=0.931 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.268 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.260 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.287 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.277
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.287 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=1181 n_q2=1218 n_q3=1242 n_q4=1253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.120
ref2=Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits sigma_overall=0.303 worst_q_ratio=1.077
new1=fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits sigma_overall=0.257 worst_q_ratio=1.095
new2=fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits sigma_overall=0.286 worst_q_ratio=1.077
reference average sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.0985
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966_astrometric_residuals.png (4897 matched stars from wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287_astrometric_residuals.png (4891 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288_astrometric_residuals.png (4894 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-13-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0287.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_021448_TTUQ1b1x1_3146757_ceS9bPgM/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:03:30.71 +04:49:47.6: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:28:51.97 +08:19:27.7: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 23:56:45.73 +05:39:18.4: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-38-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0966.fits at 00:01:01.29 +05:11:52.9: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:03:30.71 +04:49:47.6: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 23:56:45.73 +05:39:18.4: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:28:51.97 +08:19:27.7: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-54-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits at 00:01:01.29 +05:11:52.9: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:45.73 +05:39:18.4: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2552 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:03:30.71 +04:49:47.6: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1884 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:01:01.29 +05:11:52.9: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2353 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20596.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20596_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
Preparing report for the candidate 20596_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20604_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 20604_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:36:10.45 +09:48:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20618_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 20618_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:51:22.73 +09:20:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20619_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 20619_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20620_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 20620_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20621_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 20621_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20622_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 20622_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53724_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53724_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53725_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53725_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53728_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53728_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53730_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53730_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53731_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53731_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:25:00.52 +05:59:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53733_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53733_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53738_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53738_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53740_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53740_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53741_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53741_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53744_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53744_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53746_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53746_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53748_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53748_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53751_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53751_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:28:51.97 +08:19:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53823_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
Preparing report for the candidate 53823_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53831_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
Preparing report for the candidate 53831_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53838_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53838_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53885_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
Preparing report for the candidate 53885_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53945_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53945_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53951_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
Preparing report for the candidate 53951_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53953_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53953_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53960_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53960_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:33:21.01 +07:23:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53962_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53962_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53965_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53965_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53971_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53971_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53975_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53975_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53982_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53982_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53984_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
Preparing report for the candidate 53984_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53985_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53985_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53987_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53987_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53999_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 53999_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54002_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54002_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54004_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54004_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54007_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54007_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54012_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54012_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54014_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54014_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54015_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54015_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54017_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54017_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54019_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54019_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54022_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54022_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54023_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54023_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54024_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54024_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54025_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54025_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54028_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54028_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54031_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54031_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54032_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54032_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54035_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54035_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54038_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54038_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54039_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54039_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54040_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54040_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54041_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54041_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54042_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54042_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54043_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54043_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54044_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54044_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54050_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54050_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54053_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54053_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54057_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54057_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54067_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54067_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54068_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54068_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54071_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54071_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:02:24.35 +08:55:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54072_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54072_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54075_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54075_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54078_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54078_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54080_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54080_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54082_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54082_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54095_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54095_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54106_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54106_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54108_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54108_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54110_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54110_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54112_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54112_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54114_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54114_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54116_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54116_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54119_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54119_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54120_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54120_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54122_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54122_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54124_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54124_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54126_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54126_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54131_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54131_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54132_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54132_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54134_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54134_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54135_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54135_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54136_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54136_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54137_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54137_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54141_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54141_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54144_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54144_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54145_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54145_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54150_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54150_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54151_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54151_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54152_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54152_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54153_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54153_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54155_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54155_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54167_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54167_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54168_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54168_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54169_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54169_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54170_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54170_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54172_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54172_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54185_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54185_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54188_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54188_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54218_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54218_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54227_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54227_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54240_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54240_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54241_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54241_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54256_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54256_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54261_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54261_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54264_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54264_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54265_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
Preparing report for the candidate 54265_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54268_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54268_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54271_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54271_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54273_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54273_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54284_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54284_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54293_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54293_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54296_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54296_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54299_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54299_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54309_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54309_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54321_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54321_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54335_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54335_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54349_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54349_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54351_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54351_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54361_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54361_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54362_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54362_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54375_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54375_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54379_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 54379_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23891_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 23891_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:54:22.30 +07:22:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26495_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288
The candidate 26495_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-14-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0288 did not pass the final checks
