This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.2848* 05 21 07.63 +23 38 20.2 9.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461301.7848,9.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260918.2848 9.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2848 2461301.7848 11.48 05:03:12.18 +24:33:34.8
178.34079 -10.29436 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 1 0 1 11.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:03:12.18 +24:33:34.8: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:03:12.18 +24:33:34.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.2848* 05 03 12.18 +24 33 34.8 11.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7848,11.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2848 11.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.2848* 05 21 07.63 +23 38 20.1 9.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461301.7848,9.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260918.2848 9.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2848 2461301.7848 13.43 05:02:46.00 +23:01:34.4
179.53962 -11.28158 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula -0 0 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:02:46.00 +23:01:34.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:02:46.00 +23:01:34.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.2848* 05 02 46.00 +23 01 34.4 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7848,13.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2848 13.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2848 2461301.7848 12.89 05:46:45.94 +24:19:52.9
184.06821 -2.17426 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia 1 -2 2 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:46:45.94 +24:19:52.9: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:46:45.94 +24:19:52.9: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.2848* 05 46 45.94 +24 19 52.9 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7848,12.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2848 12.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2848 2461301.7848 13.63 05:33:24.50 +20:08:30.2
186.00857 -7.00767 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.1" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.168 Sibylla 1 -0 1 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:33:24.50 +20:08:30.2: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:33:24.50 +20:08:30.2: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.2848* 05 33 24.50 +20 08 30.2 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7848,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2848 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2848 2461301.7848 12.59 06:00:14.11 +22:46:06.9
186.98133 -0.30654 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J060014.16+224607.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.050 V 14.690 V 2458409.32220 219.569739300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:00:14.11 +22:46:06.9: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:00:14.11 +22:46:06.9: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.2848* 06 00 14.11 +22 46 06.9 12.6 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J060014.16+224607.8,2461301.7848,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J060014.16+224607.8 20260918.2848 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2848 2461301.7848 12.89 06:05:23.41 +21:44:23.4
188.46440 0.22398 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" NSVS 9729587
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.086 r Y 0.580 R1 2451633.22000 157.283110400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:05:23.41 +21:44:23.4: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:05:23.41 +21:44:23.4: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 9729587,2461301.7848,12.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 9729587 20260918.2848 12.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2848 2461301.7848 13.25 05:53:33.64 +20:23:47.9
188.25648 -2.83806 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J055333.71+202347.1
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.100 V 15.700 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:53:33.64 +20:23:47.9: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:53:33.64 +20:23:47.9: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.2848* 05 53 33.64 +20 23 47.9 13.2 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J055333.71+202347.1,2461301.7848,13.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J055333.71+202347.1 20260918.2848 13.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2848 2461301.7848 13.47 05:38:00.39 +23:16:01.0
183.92295 -4.43834 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" Gaia DR3 3404388681665072640
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.340 G 12.540 G M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:38:00.39 +23:16:01.0: 15.05 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:38:00.39 +23:16:01.0: 14.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.2848* 05 38 00.39 +23 16 01.0 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3404388681665072640,2461301.7848,13.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3404388681665072640 20260918.2848 13.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2848 2461301.7848 13.48 05:49:25.71 +23:32:26.0
185.06019 -2.06073 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ZTF J054925.65+233228.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.034 r Y 0.286 r 2458476.82480 70.619137100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:25.71 +23:32:26.0: 14.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:25.71 +23:32:26.0: 14.71 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.2848* 05 49 25.71 +23 32 26.0 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J054925.65+233228.0,2461301.7848,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J054925.65+233228.0 20260918.2848 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2848 2461301.7848 11.12 05:10:50.20 +22:12:08.2
181.32508 -10.24686 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J051050+2212.2
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.294 Ic Y 0.261 Ic 2454264.40000 534.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:10:50.20 +22:12:08.2: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:50.20 +22:12:08.2: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.2848* 05 10 50.20 +22 12 08.2 11.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J051050+2212.2,2461301.7848,11.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J051050+2212.2 20260918.2848 11.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2848 2461301.7848 13.10 06:02:59.03 +24:06:31.2
186.12858 0.90431 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.1" and 6.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" 2MASS J06025920+2406323
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.253 r Y 0.298 r 2458449.73830 213.802877800000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:59.03 +24:06:31.2: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:59.03 +24:06:31.2: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
2MASS J06025920+2406323,2461301.7848,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
2MASS J06025920+2406323 20260918.2848 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461301.78517231 18.09.2026 06:50:28.888 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 20
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20362
Objects passed selection criteria: 20289
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16320.8
Average stars matched: 16094.2 (98.6122 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249920 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 02:38:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461301.78517231 18.09.2026 06:50:28.888 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 216
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 69 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 150903
Objects passed selection criteria: 150524
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 113534
Average stars matched: 109961 (96.8523 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 612132 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 02:40:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461301.78447128
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.848 +21:57:47.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:18.848 +21:57:47.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0363 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Image size: 944.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.530 +21:57:48.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:21.530 +21:57:48.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0367 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:18.848 +21:57:47.55
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:21.530 +21:57:48.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01037 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J2NIJ4wqyi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LiPtTfjcGm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bJMPvxYFn5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2SualStvSj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 20 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
3.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
3.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.J2NIJ4wqyi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LiPtTfjcGm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bJMPvxYFn5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=453, bad_region=1, passed=10794
Got 10794 stars (including 10333 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10794 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4721 stars left (next iteration limit 5192)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=7.533 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.814 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=0.899 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.441 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=0.524 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.727 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4721 robust_rms_before=1.674 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.529 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.524 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.658 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.727
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.658 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits N_match=4721 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.649 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.466 n_q1=1007 n_q2=1305 n_q3=895 n_q4=1514 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2SualStvSj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=461, bad_region=0, passed=10953
Got 10953 stars (including 10483 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10953 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4791 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4791 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4722 stars left (next iteration limit 5194)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=7.770 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.273 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=0.751 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.221 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=0.472 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.578 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4722 robust_rms_before=1.575 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.532 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.472 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.634 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.578
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.634 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits N_match=4722 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.639 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.489 n_q1=1018 n_q2=1306 n_q3=884 n_q4=1514 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.209
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.482 worst_q_ratio=1.251
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits sigma_overall=0.525 worst_q_ratio=1.237
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits sigma_overall=0.528 worst_q_ratio=1.209
reference average sigma_overall=0.4295 worst_q_ratio=1.243
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4714 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263_astrometric_residuals.png (4721 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264_astrometric_residuals.png (4722 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:03:12.18 +24:33:34.8: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:03:12.18 +24:33:34.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30766.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30689_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 30689_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30766_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 30766_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30811_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 30811_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:09.68 +19:28:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16428_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 16428_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:25.45 +19:25:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.18 +17:53:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:04.07 +20:30:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18264_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 18264_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:41.34 +18:35:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11829_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 11829_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.89 +21:13:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17081_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 17081_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:10.62 +19:08:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.46 +17:54:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22152_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 22152_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:40.82 +16:57:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04530_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 04530_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:08.15 +24:51:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.96 +20:10:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04299_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 04299_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.70 +25:00:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 20601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.13 +17:45:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.43 +20:22:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.39 +23:51:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14002_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 14002_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.36 +20:16:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07308_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 07308_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:07.06 +23:15:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14077_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 14077_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.12 +20:08:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 18s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:03:12.18 +24:33:34.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.848 +21:57:47.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:18.848 +21:57:47.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0363 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Image size: 944.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.530 +21:57:48.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:21.530 +21:57:48.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0367 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:18.848 +21:57:47.55
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:21.530 +21:57:48.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01037 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QtQqc6axIR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.anBwgzuamz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hNaaQhUNbt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fPxxRrSFcg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 193 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
3.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
3.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.QtQqc6axIR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.anBwgzuamz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4711 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4711 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=978 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hNaaQhUNbt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=3735, bad_region=20, passed=62499
Got 62499 stars (including 58666 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62499 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4772 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4772 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4710 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4710 robust_rms=7.890 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.030 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4710 robust_rms=0.881 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.454 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4710 robust_rms=0.520 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.726 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4710 robust_rms_before=1.668 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.519 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.520 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.645 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.726
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.645 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits N_match=4710 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.462 n_q1=1031 n_q2=1224 n_q3=927 n_q4=1528 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.226
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fPxxRrSFcg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=3893, bad_region=22, passed=63626
Got 63626 stars (including 59652 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63626 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4775 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4775 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4712 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4712 robust_rms=8.233 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.266 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4712 robust_rms=0.730 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.225 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4712 robust_rms=0.475 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.570 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4712 robust_rms_before=1.570 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.510 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.475 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.616 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.570
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.616 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits N_match=4712 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=1028 n_q2=1229 n_q3=921 n_q4=1534 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_015103_TTUQ1b1x1_2244003_lF0gDAtL/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:53:14.92 +17:46:32.5: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:11:57.32 +24:41:59.6: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:03:31.34 +24:20:20.5: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:08:33.28 +26:27:01.9: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:16:05.94 +25:21:52.6: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:18.09 +16:44:37.9: 10.54 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:53:14.92 +17:46:32.5: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:11:57.32 +24:41:59.6: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:08:33.28 +26:27:01.9: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:03:31.34 +24:20:20.5: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:16:05.94 +25:21:52.6: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:14.92 +17:46:32.5: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7321 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:57.32 +24:41:59.6: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1753 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:33.28 +26:27:01.9: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5852 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:31.34 +24:20:20.5: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8366 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:05.94 +25:21:52.6: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6243 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:21.01 +16:35:20.7: 10.95 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:15.76 +16:33:24.3: 11.00 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:18.09 +16:44:37.9: 10.52 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.53 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:18.09 +16:44:37.9: ref_mag=10.53 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8910 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:21.01 +16:35:20.7: 10.95 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.95 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:21.01 +16:35:20.7: ref_mag=10.95 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1424 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:15.76 +16:33:24.3: 10.99 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.00 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:15.76 +16:33:24.3: ref_mag=11.00 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2200 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:07:15.55 +25:16:10.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:51.54 +16:34:54.9: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:23.52 +16:42:29.1: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:29.84 +16:56:17.3: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:24.64 +16:31:48.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:07:15.55 +25:16:10.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:15.55 +25:16:10.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:51.54 +16:34:54.9: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:51.54 +16:34:54.9: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7861 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:35:02.37 +24:18:47.6: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:23.52 +16:42:29.1: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:23.52 +16:42:29.1: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8339 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:29.84 +16:56:17.3: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:24.64 +16:31:48.8: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:24.64 +16:31:48.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:29.84 +16:56:17.3: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8684 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:35:02.37 +24:18:47.6: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:02.37 +24:18:47.6: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7478 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:58.93 +16:30:42.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:02:46.00 +23:01:34.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:46:45.94 +24:19:52.9: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:58.93 +16:30:42.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:58.93 +16:30:42.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:59.75 +22:34:33.1: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:02:46.00 +23:01:34.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:35.46 +16:55:08.2: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:46:45.94 +24:19:52.9: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:00.43 +16:54:13.4: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:59.75 +22:34:33.1: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:59.75 +22:34:33.1: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8828 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:00.43 +16:54:13.4: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:35.46 +16:55:08.2: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:35.46 +16:55:08.2: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4287 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:00.43 +16:54:13.4: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4970 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.62 +25:20:29.2: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:50:02.16 +22:57:57.3: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.62 +25:20:29.2: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.62 +25:20:29.2: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2810 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:50:02.16 +22:57:57.3: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:02.16 +22:57:57.3: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1454 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:33:24.50 +20:08:30.2: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:34.24 +16:51:48.9: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:33:24.50 +20:08:30.2: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:34.24 +16:51:48.9: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:34.24 +16:51:48.9: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9576 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:55:56.07 +22:51:49.0: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:55:56.07 +22:51:49.0: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:56.07 +22:51:49.0: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7481 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:00:14.11 +22:46:06.9: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:54.54 +21:13:25.1: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:00:14.11 +22:46:06.9: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:00:14.11 +22:46:06.9: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5902 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:54.54 +21:13:25.1: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:42:54.54 +21:13:25.1: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2229 delta=0.80 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:05:23.41 +21:44:23.4: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:05:23.41 +21:44:23.4: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:05:23.41 +21:44:23.4: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8938 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:53:33.64 +20:23:47.9: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:53:33.64 +20:23:47.9: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:53:33.64 +20:23:47.9: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2501 delta=1.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:09.84 +20:53:06.2: 12.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:38:00.39 +23:16:01.0: 15.05 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:09.84 +20:53:06.2: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:09.84 +20:53:06.2: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8622 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:38:00.39 +23:16:01.0: 14.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:38:00.39 +23:16:01.0: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4671 delta=1.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:59:15.34 +22:50:22.5: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:25.71 +23:32:26.0: 14.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:10:50.20 +22:12:08.2: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:59:15.34 +22:50:22.5: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:15.34 +22:50:22.5: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9976 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:25.71 +23:32:26.0: 14.71 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:49:25.71 +23:32:26.0: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4790 delta=1.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:50.20 +22:12:08.2: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:10:50.20 +22:12:08.2: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1197 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:59.03 +24:06:31.2: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:59.03 +24:06:31.2: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:02:59.03 +24:06:31.2: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0709 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106195.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191343.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191359.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191817.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out42684.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53883.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out59010.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out63572.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77312.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80011.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190588_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190588_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190590_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190590_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:48.98 +24:13:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190599_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190599_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:21.96 +23:00:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190603_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190603_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:57.97 +22:41:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190604_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190604_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:12.89 +24:49:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190606_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190606_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190616_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190616_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:29.66 +16:41:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190628_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 190628_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190630_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190630_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:14.71 +16:55:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190673_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190673_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:58.90 +26:19:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190707_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190707_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:12.19 +24:33:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190783_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190783_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190837_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190837_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190852_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190852_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190865_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190865_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.14 +22:38:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190930_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190930_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.89 +25:55:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190936_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190936_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.95 +26:25:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.85 +23:48:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190955_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190955_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.64 +22:27:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190992_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 190992_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191032_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191032_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:41.74 +23:02:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191035_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191035_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191037_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191037_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191048_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191048_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191060_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191060_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:37.02 +25:05:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191079_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191079_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.77 +19:34:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191080_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191080_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191142_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191142_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.97 +26:10:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191147_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191147_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191156_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191156_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:20.91 +23:48:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191191_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191191_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:56.17 +24:36:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191211_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191211_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.92 +20:10:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191213_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191213_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:20.42 +22:03:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191219_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191219_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.22 +18:59:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191224_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191224_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:10.90 +25:24:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191233_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191233_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:36.58 +22:27:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191234_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191234_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.76 +22:40:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191247_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191247_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:23.14 +25:24:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191254_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191254_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191255_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191255_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.33 +18:33:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191295_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191295_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:40.34 +20:26:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191303_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191303_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.71 +18:25:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191325_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191325_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.05 +23:00:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191339_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191339_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.28 +22:45:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191343_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 191343_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191357_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191357_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:47.54 +26:44:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191359_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 191359_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191365_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191365_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.32 +25:08:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191373_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191373_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.23 +20:53:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:03.04 +18:33:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191401_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191401_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191413_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191413_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.76 +20:02:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191414_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191414_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.32 +25:47:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191423_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191423_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:48.66 +25:09:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191447_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191447_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191476_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191476_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:40.05 +20:26:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191478_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191478_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191484_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191484_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:35.61 +23:40:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191491_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191491_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.89 +23:11:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191515_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191515_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.67 +19:32:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191537_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191537_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:58.87 +25:07:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191548_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191548_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.17 +25:25:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191553_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191553_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:02.41 +24:22:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191558_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191558_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191560_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191560_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.57 +21:46:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191566_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191566_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:15.00 +19:35:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.39 +20:56:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.57 +25:22:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191617_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191617_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191623_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191623_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.44 +24:25:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191637_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191637_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:11.62 +25:41:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:39.94 +22:58:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191664_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191664_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:43.03 +24:06:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191680_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191680_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:43.32 +26:18:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191682_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191682_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:46.66 +22:17:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191688_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191688_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:21.93 +24:21:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191696_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191696_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:57.62 +25:53:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191730_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191730_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.25 +23:07:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191740_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191740_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:51.80 +20:00:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191768_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191768_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191817_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 191817_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191830_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191830_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191837_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191837_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:33.81 +21:19:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191846_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 191846_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:34.68 +17:59:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:07.05 +23:15:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.37 +20:16:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160317_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 160317_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:26.09 +17:23:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39648_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 39648_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:00.77 +24:33:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120138_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 120138_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:10.18 +17:57:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 101378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:22.20 +20:52:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129379_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 129379_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:31.60 +18:32:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 105095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:39.28 +20:41:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84793_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 84793_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:38.24 +21:56:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 34493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.69 +25:00:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143252_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 143252_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:38.14 +19:21:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130073_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 130073_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:41.36 +18:35:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57016_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 57016_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:58.89 +23:30:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 62770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74393_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 74393_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:00.41 +22:16:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33497_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 33497_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:08.15 +24:51:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138780_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 138780_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:10.62 +19:08:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:36.14 +25:59:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40163_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 40163_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:52.05 +24:29:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116971_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 116971_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:06.67 +19:53:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32270_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 32270_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:11.17 +24:55:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165040_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 165040_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:17.38 +17:31:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.38 +25:40:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78253_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 78253_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:51.44 +22:05:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 56378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:34.82 +23:22:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:50.55 +21:45:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52744_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 52744_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:00.86 +23:44:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147723_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 147723_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:00.66 +19:35:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:01.29 +20:16:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114749_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 114749_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:43.69 +20:01:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98078_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 98078_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:16.06 +20:53:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:18.07 +24:59:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 76761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:57.91 +22:13:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.78 +23:10:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.42 +26:13:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 34402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.95 +24:53:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68483_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 68483_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:59.80 +22:30:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 63572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38929_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 38929_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:42.95 +24:38:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93856_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 93856_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74785_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 74785_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:29.13 +22:03:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.16 +24:09:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67949_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 67949_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:46.83 +22:35:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158119_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 158119_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:04.14 +17:07:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:37.35 +20:19:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140726_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 140726_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 80011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34058_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 34058_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:44.55 +24:57:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167486_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 167486_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:33.72 +17:49:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59567_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 59567_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:36.10 +23:13:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.78 +19:21:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86369_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 86369_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:16.51 +21:31:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106195_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 106195_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:20.19 +17:59:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:56.56 +21:25:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111938_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 111938_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:46.39 +19:56:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157320_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 157320_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:47.18 +17:10:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 49132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:19.51 +23:56:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99311_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 99311_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:53.29 +20:56:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:30.70 +22:47:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101041_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 101041_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.45 +17:54:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09594_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 09594_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:40.05 +26:28:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.23 +20:22:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59010_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 59010_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 32970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:04.39 +25:01:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.46 +20:22:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.12 +17:45:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:25.45 +19:25:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115776_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 115776_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 65120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:25.84 +22:48:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.16 +17:53:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53883_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 53883_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 61658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:20.96 +23:05:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77312_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 77312_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70425_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 70425_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:36.07 +22:25:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62537_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 62537_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118724_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 118724_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.58 +17:51:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 153854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:40.81 +16:57:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.08 +21:51:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42684_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 42684_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09435_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 09435_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:45.83 +26:37:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.39 +23:51:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:48.51 +19:44:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38029_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 38029_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:08.11 +24:31:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135311_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 135311_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:34.86 +18:52:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.88 +21:13:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:15.51 +20:28:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18807_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 18807_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.59 +25:49:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 79132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:35.90 +21:55:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.96 +20:10:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108697_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 108697_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.78 +20:28:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96330_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 96330_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:38.62 +21:08:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66296_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 66296_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:07.22 +22:50:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117978_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 117978_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:12.82 +18:35:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133429_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 133429_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.46 +18:42:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163269_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 163269_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:22.54 +17:31:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116845_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 116845_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:23.27 +19:52:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157917_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 157917_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:01.74 +17:14:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 155021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:14.32 +17:03:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 155271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:03.65 +17:02:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150783_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 150783_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:56.59 +19:44:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14039_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 14039_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:59.60 +25:57:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.10 +20:08:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 166587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:26.02 +17:43:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264
The candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0264 did not pass the final checks
