This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 17.4035* 05 21 07.63 +23 38 20.0 10.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461300.9035,10.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260917.4035 10.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 17.4035* 05 21 07.62 +23 38 20.1 10.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461300.9035,10.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260917.4035 10.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4035 2461300.9035 13.51 05:32:46.70 +20:09:30.2
185.91469 -7.12368 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.168 Sibylla -1 -0 1 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:32:46.70 +20:09:30.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:46.70 +20:09:30.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 17.4035* 05 32 46.70 +20 09 30.2 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461300.9035,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260917.4035 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.4035 2461300.9035 14.05 05:26:50.41 +24:45:16.1
181.28165 -5.77765 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" CSS 150316:052650+244517
Type: LPV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.200 CV 16.100 CV C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:26:50.41 +24:45:16.1: 15.32 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:26:50.41 +24:45:16.1: 16.03 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.45 +/- 0.14
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 17.4035* 05 26 50.41 +24 45 16.1 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CSS 150316:052650+244517,2461300.9035,14.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CSS 150316:052650+244517 20260917.4035 14.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461300.90402517 17.09.2026 09:41:37.775 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20634
Objects passed selection criteria: 20601
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 17230.2
Average stars matched: 16967 (98.4722 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 245520 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 17 04:44:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461300.90402517 17.09.2026 09:41:37.775 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 129
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 108 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 152256
Objects passed selection criteria: 151912
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 124724
Average stars matched: 120852 (96.8958 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 616224 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 17 04:47:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461300.90302676
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:24.082 +21:59:09.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:24.082 +21:59:09.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0219 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.401 +21:59:43.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:21.401 +21:59:43.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:24.082 +21:59:09.95
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:21.401 +21:59:43.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01395 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.THJKfbN4nm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5vXUwTFiZS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZveQYSmOyD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mYn42Yhvud
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.THJKfbN4nm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5vXUwTFiZS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZveQYSmOyD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=601, bad_region=0, passed=12178
Got 12178 stars (including 11563 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12178 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4719 stars left (next iteration limit 5189)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4719 robust_rms=9.902 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.504 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4719 robust_rms=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.376 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4719 robust_rms=0.297 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.349 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4719 robust_rms_before=0.909 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.411 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.297 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.517 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.349
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:24.084 +21:59:09.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 12178 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2280107.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.909 -> 0.297 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4719 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4497 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4497 pairs (4719 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4497 robust_rms=9.526 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.592 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4497 robust_rms=0.351 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.371 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4497 robust_rms=0.290 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.334 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4497 robust_rms_before=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.290 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.332 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.334
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-quadrant 0.334 vs 0.332 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4497 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4497 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits N_match=4497 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=1000 n_q2=1304 n_q3=743 n_q4=1450 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.mYn42Yhvud (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=684, bad_region=0, passed=13220
Got 13220 stars (including 12526 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13220 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4790 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4724 stars left (next iteration limit 5198)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4724 robust_rms=8.891 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.881 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4724 robust_rms=0.341 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.352 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4724 robust_rms=0.285 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.326 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4724 robust_rms_before=0.862 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.419 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.285 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.528 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.326
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.409 +21:59:42.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13220 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2280677.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.862 -> 0.285 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4724 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4482 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4482 pairs (4724 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4482 robust_rms=8.371 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.367 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4482 robust_rms=0.331 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.341 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4482 robust_rms=0.277 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.311 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4482 robust_rms_before=0.278 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.278 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.277 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.314 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.311
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.408 +21:59:42.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13220 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2286055.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.278 -> 0.277 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4482 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4482 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits N_match=4482 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=971 n_q2=1360 n_q3=695 n_q4=1456 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.091
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.482 worst_q_ratio=1.251
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits sigma_overall=0.323 worst_q_ratio=1.104
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.091
reference average sigma_overall=0.4295 worst_q_ratio=1.243
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4714 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048_astrometric_residuals.png (4497 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049_astrometric_residuals.png (4482 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:20.89 +20:40:00.4: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:31:13.54 +20:54:35.4: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:06:46.78 +19:35:29.4: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:31:13.54 +20:54:35.4: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:20.89 +20:40:00.4: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:06:46.78 +19:35:29.4: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:13.54 +20:54:35.4: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9478 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:20.89 +20:40:00.4: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0006 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:06:46.78 +19:35:29.4: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2654 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30697_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 30697_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30897_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 30897_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:09.62 +19:28:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30913_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 30913_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30927_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 30927_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30972_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 30972_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.43 +20:22:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16428_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 16428_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:25.39 +19:25:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.45 +17:54:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:24.084 +21:59:09.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:24.084 +21:59:09.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0221 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.408 +21:59:42.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:21.408 +21:59:42.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0082 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:24.084 +21:59:09.14
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:21.408 +21:59:42.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01395 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7L3EouDQVG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vKyAZNdzCI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pVIoVGHsHD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V3OpDFMwDN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 98 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.7L3EouDQVG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vKyAZNdzCI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4711 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4711 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=978 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pVIoVGHsHD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=5797, bad_region=37, passed=83156
Got 83156 stars (including 77216 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 83156 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4787 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4737 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4737 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4737 stars left (next iteration limit 5211)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4737 robust_rms=10.227 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.297 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4737 robust_rms=0.372 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.389 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4737 robust_rms=0.295 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.352 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4737 robust_rms_before=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.365 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.295 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.350 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.352
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.350 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits N_match=4737 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=1078 n_q2=1330 n_q3=827 n_q4=1502 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.266
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.V3OpDFMwDN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=6266, bad_region=42, passed=87717
Got 87717 stars (including 81310 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87717 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4774 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4774 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4714 robust_rms=9.496 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.210 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4714 robust_rms=0.351 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.358 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4714 robust_rms=0.286 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.330 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4714 robust_rms_before=0.287 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.376 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.286 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.330 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.330
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.330 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1030 n_q2=1384 n_q3=771 n_q4=1529 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-40-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_044219_TTUQ1b1x1_2136627_rMMOj0tr/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:24.39 +19:48:59.8: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:30.72 +19:19:20.5: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:30.28 +19:22:17.7: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:03:24.84 +19:17:56.3: 15.02 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:03:32.31 +23:29:16.8: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:05:14.74 +18:17:53.1: 14.66 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:08:39.36 +18:12:13.8: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:38:28.34 +18:08:51.9: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:03:24.84 +19:17:56.3: 14.71 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:03:32.31 +23:29:16.8: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:30.72 +19:19:20.5: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:05:14.74 +18:17:53.1: 14.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:30.28 +19:22:17.7: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:24.39 +19:48:59.8: 14.57 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:24.84 +19:17:56.3: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1302 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:32.31 +23:29:16.8: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8067 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:30.72 +19:19:20.5: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3643 delta=-1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:14.74 +18:17:53.1: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2848 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:30.28 +19:22:17.7: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5651 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:24.39 +19:48:59.8: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1881 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:12.88 +24:49:47.8: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:12:57.86 +19:26:32.0: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:08:39.36 +18:12:13.8: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:38:28.34 +18:08:51.9: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:39.36 +18:12:13.8: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6787 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:28.34 +18:08:51.9: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1309 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:12.88 +24:49:47.8: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:12.88 +24:49:47.8: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8556 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:12:57.86 +19:26:32.0: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:57.86 +19:26:32.0: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9910 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:16:23.23 +25:24:10.3: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:10:48.64 +25:09:12.9: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.61 +25:20:29.4: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:20.40 +25:08:58.8: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:24.00 +26:25:38.5: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:16:23.23 +25:24:10.3: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:23.23 +25:24:10.3: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0820 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:48.64 +25:09:12.9: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:48.64 +25:09:12.9: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1266 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:20.40 +25:08:58.8: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.61 +25:20:29.4: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:24.00 +26:25:38.5: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:20.40 +25:08:58.8: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2108 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.61 +25:20:29.4: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0741 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:24.00 +26:25:38.5: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1318 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:56.34 +21:49:36.6: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:11:25.35 +24:24:28.7: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:07:15.63 +25:16:12.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:32:46.70 +20:09:30.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:15:00.49 +20:57:17.7: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:56.34 +21:49:36.6: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:56.34 +21:49:36.6: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5193 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:27:58.91 +21:26:30.1: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:11:25.35 +24:24:28.7: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:07:15.63 +25:16:12.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:15.63 +25:16:12.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:25.35 +24:24:28.7: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5556 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:46.70 +20:09:30.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:01:14.94 +22:32:19.2: 13.78 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:15:00.49 +20:57:17.7: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:00.49 +20:57:17.7: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7173 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:18:22.63 +20:31:57.8: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:27:58.91 +21:26:30.1: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:58.91 +21:26:30.1: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7142 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:14.94 +22:32:19.2: 13.81 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:14.94 +22:32:19.2: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4806 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:38:53.56 +18:38:44.3: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:18:22.63 +20:31:57.8: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:18:22.63 +20:31:57.8: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8090 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:51:02.24 +24:55:38.7: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:38:53.56 +18:38:44.3: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:53.56 +18:38:44.3: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7024 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:58.67 +21:14:00.7: 14.54 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:16:48.34 +26:48:15.9: 14.89 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:32:21.37 +20:56:49.8: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:51:02.24 +24:55:38.7: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:02.24 +24:55:38.7: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7613 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:15:47.51 +26:59:41.6: 15.08 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:11.88 +20:52:01.5: 15.39 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:58.67 +21:14:00.7: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:58.67 +21:14:00.7: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9461 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:16:48.34 +26:48:15.9: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:21.37 +20:56:49.8: 14.23 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:48.34 +26:48:15.9: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2800 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:21.37 +20:56:49.8: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9789 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:15:47.51 +26:59:41.6: 15.18 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:47.51 +26:59:41.6: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3046 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:07:33.86 +19:26:46.0: 15.12 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:17.02 +25:23:28.1: 14.69 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:11.88 +20:52:01.5: 15.35 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:11.88 +20:52:01.5: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4951 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:06:54.76 +20:25:56.3: 15.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:17.02 +25:23:28.1: 14.92 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:07:33.86 +19:26:46.0: 15.02 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:17.02 +25:23:28.1: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3806 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:33.86 +19:26:46.0: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5309 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:17.19 +25:40:05.2: 15.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:07:16.43 +18:51:17.3: 15.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:23:00.17 +26:59:00.5: 15.41 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:06:54.76 +20:25:56.3: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:06:54.76 +20:25:56.3: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4571 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:03.56 +20:11:12.9: 14.92 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:17.19 +25:40:05.2: 15.56 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:17.19 +25:40:05.2: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5074 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:23:00.17 +26:59:00.5: 15.38 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:07:16.43 +18:51:17.3: 15.16 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:00.17 +26:59:00.5: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5324 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:16.43 +18:51:17.3: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5026 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:03.56 +20:11:12.9: 14.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:03.56 +20:11:12.9: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5851 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:34.73 +26:51:38.4: 14.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:26:50.41 +24:45:16.1: 15.32 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:05:23.38 +21:44:23.2: 14.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:34.73 +26:51:38.4: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:34.73 +26:51:38.4: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6638 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:26:50.41 +24:45:16.1: 16.03 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.45 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:26:50.41 +24:45:16.1: ref_mag=15.45 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.0450 delta=1.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:05:23.38 +21:44:23.2: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:23.38 +21:44:23.2: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2688 delta=0.80 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:23.56 +25:51:59.8: 14.26 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:23.56 +25:51:59.8: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:23.56 +25:51:59.8: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8217 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191848.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out37049.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190577_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 190577_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:10.61 +20:22:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 190579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 190580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190593_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 190593_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:31.03 +18:09:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 190596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:01.34 +20:10:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 190601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 190618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 190624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190627_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 190627_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190630_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 190630_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:21.95 +23:00:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190631_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 190631_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190636_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 190636_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190638_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 190638_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190652_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 190652_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:54.42 +18:25:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190654_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 190654_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190660_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 190660_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190661_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 190661_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:16.89 +20:08:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190686_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 190686_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190728_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 190728_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:58.96 +26:19:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190949_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 190949_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.88 +25:55:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191010_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191010_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:39.93 +26:04:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191102_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191102_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.98 +20:10:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191110_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191110_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.13 +22:38:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191145_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191145_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.73 +19:34:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191263_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191263_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:40.17 +20:26:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191301_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191301_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.96 +26:10:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.33 +20:56:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191366_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191366_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191377_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191377_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191393_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191393_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:23.06 +26:26:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191438_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191438_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.63 +20:05:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191439_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191439_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191494_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191494_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191506_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191506_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.48 +20:09:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191529_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191529_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:21.49 +26:25:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:21.00 +23:48:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191655_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191655_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:52.79 +19:50:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191663_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191663_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.50 +20:26:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191669_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191669_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:21.41 +17:46:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191688_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191688_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:29.17 +18:44:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191726_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191726_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.80 +22:40:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191729_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191729_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191760_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191760_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.49 +24:25:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191781_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191781_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191833_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191833_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191848_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 191848_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191864_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191864_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191871_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191871_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:56.95 +19:31:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191913_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191913_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.13 +23:12:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191927_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191927_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:31.43 +18:39:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191950_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191950_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191991_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 191991_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192060_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192060_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192074_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192074_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.89 +23:13:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192114_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192114_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192128_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192128_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.29 +23:07:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192135_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192135_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:33.71 +21:19:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192154_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192154_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:02.77 +19:09:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192172_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192172_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192209_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192209_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:48.58 +25:21:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192214_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192214_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192319_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192319_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.27 +23:00:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192342_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192342_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.27 +25:18:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192355_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192355_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192452_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192452_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192463_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192463_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192547_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192547_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192551_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192551_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:05.42 +22:29:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192569_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192569_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192600_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192600_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192631_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192631_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192653_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192653_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192663_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 192663_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:15.49 +20:28:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99311_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 99311_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:53.24 +20:56:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 36272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:32.53 +24:36:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15266_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 15266_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:52.17 +26:03:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:01.37 +20:16:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114749_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 114749_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:43.69 +20:01:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.45 +26:13:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179688_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 179688_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 37049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:37.38 +20:19:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 80011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:36.06 +25:59:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.09 +20:22:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 32970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:04.39 +25:01:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.45 +17:54:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.43 +20:22:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.07 +17:45:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:25.40 +19:25:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09435_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 09435_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:45.77 +26:37:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.36 +23:51:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:48.55 +19:44:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18279_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 18279_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
