This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3852 2461300.8852 14.00 22:53:00.74 +62:37:58.2
109.78898 2.82267 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 22:53:00.74 +62:37:58.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.749+/-0.042 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:53:00.74 +62:37:58.2: 15.36 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:53:00.74 +62:37:58.2: 15.18 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.17
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461300.8852,14.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260917.3852 14.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3852 2461300.8852 12.75 21:44:40.05 +60:37:55.4
101.91801 5.62448 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 3.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J214439.72+603757.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.400 V 14.800 V 2458293.81850 68.579793800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:44:40.05 +60:37:55.4: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:44:40.05 +60:37:55.4: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J214439.72+603757.8,2461300.8852,12.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J214439.72+603757.8 20260917.3852 12.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3852 2461300.8852 13.42 22:58:23.02 +62:37:35.9
110.34396 2.55096 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 22:58:23.02 +62:37:35.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.869+/-0.028 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:58:23.02 +62:37:35.9: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:58:23.02 +62:37:35.9: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461300.8852,13.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260917.3852 13.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3852 2461300.8852 13.45 21:19:06.60 +63:07:03.4
101.43055 9.49653 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 21:19:06.60 +63:07:03.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:19:06.60 +63:07:03.4: 14.31 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:19:06.60 +63:07:03.4: 14.42 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461300.8852,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260917.3852 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3852 2461300.8852 13.53 22:50:56.53 +62:29:58.0
109.51578 2.80893 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 2.7 pix
The object was found in VSX17" ZTF J225058.91+623001.8
Type: TTS/ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.013 r Y 0.143 r 2458364.80580 5.387391900000
ATTENTION: measured mag 13.53 is 3.3 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 16.87 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:50:56.53 +62:29:58.0: 14.60 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:50:56.53 +62:29:58.0: 14.70 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J225058.91+623001.8,2461300.8852,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J225058.91+623001.8 20260917.3852 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3852 2461300.8852 12.64 22:00:43.50 +65:03:46.4
106.16044 7.90941 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 2.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V0631 Cep
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.900 V 14.500 V 72.300000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:00:43.50 +65:03:46.4: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:00:43.50 +65:03:46.4: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0631 Cep,2461300.8852,12.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0631 Cep 20260917.3852 12.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3852 2461300.8852 13.63 22:54:25.28 +62:17:52.5
109.78877 2.45026 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 22:54:25.28 +62:17:52.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.526+/-0.031 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:54:25.28 +62:17:52.5: 14.51 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:54:25.28 +62:17:52.5: 14.72 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461300.8852,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260917.3852 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3852 2461300.8852 12.38 21:42:37.97 +60:29:42.2
101.63789 5.68415 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J214237.81+602942.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.909 g Y 0.146 g 2458437.63970 46.314687200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:42:37.97 +60:29:42.2: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:42:37.97 +60:29:42.2: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J214237.81+602942.7,2461300.8852,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J214237.81+602942.7 20260917.3852 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3852 2461300.8852 12.05 21:23:39.27 +63:48:32.9
102.29198 9.61568 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 2.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J212338.98+634833.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.430 V 14.030 V 2457656.80000 66.600000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:23:39.27 +63:48:32.9: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:23:39.27 +63:48:32.9: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J212338.98+634833.7,2461300.8852,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J212338.98+634833.7 20260917.3852 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3852 2461300.8852 13.32 22:37:11.23 +58:17:40.4
106.04093 -0.10439 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 3.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J223711.37+581740.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.570 g Y 0.840 g 2459065.78500 368.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:37:11.23 +58:17:40.4: 14.32 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:37:11.23 +58:17:40.4: 14.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J223711.37+581740.4,2461300.8852,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J223711.37+581740.4 20260917.3852 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3852 2461300.8852 13.29 21:24:37.94 +64:06:55.9
102.58927 9.75535 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 2.6 pix
The object was found in VSX19" ZTF J212437.55+640714.7
Type: EW
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.641 r Y 0.521 r 2458641.96870 0.400014600000
ATTENTION: measured mag 13.29 is 4.8 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 18.12 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:24:37.94 +64:06:55.9: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:24:37.94 +64:06:55.9: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J212437.55+640714.7,2461300.8852,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J212437.55+640714.7 20260917.3852 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3852 2461300.8852 13.32 22:51:59.30 +62:17:55.2
109.53487 2.57519 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 22:51:59.30 +62:17:55.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.589+/-0.028 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:51:59.30 +62:17:55.2: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:51:59.30 +62:17:55.2: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461300.8852,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260917.3852 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3852 2461300.8852 13.29 22:40:25.32 +58:21:52.6
106.44593 -0.24988 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2008153985518134016 | 22:40:22.43 +58:22:03.9 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.262+/-0.035 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:40:25.32 +58:21:52.6: 14.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:40:25.32 +58:21:52.6: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2008153985518134016,2461300.8852,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2008153985518134016 20260917.3852 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3852 2461300.8852 13.15 21:21:17.73 +63:43:40.6
102.04799 9.74487 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 21:21:17.73 +63:43:40.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.693+/-0.035 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:21:17.73 +63:43:40.6: 14.15 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:21:17.73 +63:43:40.6: 14.07 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461300.8852,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260917.3852 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3852 2461300.8852 13.23 22:51:49.89 +62:29:40.2
109.60559 2.75874 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 22:51:49.89 +62:29:40.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=1.855+/-0.028 (Very red!)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:51:49.89 +62:29:40.2: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:51:49.89 +62:29:40.2: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461300.8852,13.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260917.3852 13.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3852 2461300.8852 13.00 22:42:55.64 +57:37:07.8
106.38155 -1.06366 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 3.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" DF Cep
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.084 r Y 3.125 r 2451340.00000 : 312.051301000000 M8-M9
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:42:55.64 +57:37:07.8: 14.15 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:42:55.64 +57:37:07.8: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DF Cep,2461300.8852,13.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DF Cep 20260917.3852 13.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 17.3852 2461300.8852 12.96 21:57:34.04 +64:57:09.7
105.82626 8.02710 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 2.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 3381103
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.399 g Y 0.432 R1 2451450.17000 58.105528300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:57:34.04 +64:57:09.7: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:57:34.04 +64:57:09.7: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 3381103,2461300.8852,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 3381103 20260917.3852 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.92432736 17.06.2026 10:10:51.884 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
First image: 2461208.92432736 17.06.2026 10:10:51.884 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Last image: 2461300.88545751 17.09.2026 09:14:53.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22880
Objects passed selection criteria: 22833
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 17874.8
Average stars matched: 17330.8 (96.9566 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 251420 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 17 04:18:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.92432736 17.06.2026 10:10:51.884 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
First image: 2461208.92432736 17.06.2026 10:10:51.884 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Last image: 2461300.88545751 17.09.2026 09:14:53.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 341
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 85 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 157283
Objects passed selection criteria: 156909
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 125382
Average stars matched: 116271 (92.7336 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 622436 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 17 04:20:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461300.88492142
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:12.802 +62:01:40.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:41.930 +62:00:10.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:17:12.802 +62:01:40.34
Second-epoch image center 22:17:41.930 +62:00:10.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0621 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:44.418 +62:00:12.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:17:12.802 +62:01:40.34
Second-epoch image center 22:17:44.418 +62:00:12.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0664 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 22:17:41.930 +62:00:10.88
Second-epoch second image center 22:17:44.418 +62:00:12.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00489 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RKazKBAmvR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wS8Gbzx8PF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ML4nClPyXV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EfoEGAKwAD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 26112 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 315.0095 to 353.5369 deg, Dec +55.9572 to +67.2906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 315.0095 to 353.5369 deg, Dec 55.9572 to 67.2906 deg
Loaded 19816 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12337 out of 13388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13388 out of 26112 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.782800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.782800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 26112 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 315.0095 to 353.5369 deg, Dec +55.9572 to +67.2906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 315.0095 to 353.5369 deg, Dec 55.9572 to 67.2906 deg
Loaded 19816 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12337 out of 13388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13388 out of 26112 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 24377 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 315.3522 to 353.8424 deg, Dec +55.5638 to +67.3262 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 315.3522 to 353.8424 deg, Dec 55.5638 to 67.3262 deg
Loaded 21135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12365 out of 13590 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13590 out of 24377 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
2.2 pix Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
15.3 mag. Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.RKazKBAmvR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2424, bad_region=0, passed=26112
Got 26112 stars (including 23667 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26112 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.847 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.580 n_q1=1171 n_q2=1526 n_q3=1075 n_q4=1130 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.436
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits -region wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wS8Gbzx8PF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2593, bad_region=0, passed=24377
Got 24377 stars (including 21747 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24377 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24377 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24377 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24377 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=1227 n_q2=1459 n_q3=1146 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits -region wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ML4nClPyXV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=615, bad_region=0, passed=10145
Got 10145 stars (including 9514 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10145 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4906 robust_rms=8.799 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.534 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4906 robust_rms=0.387 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.431 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4906 robust_rms=0.303 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.348 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4906 robust_rms_before=0.722 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.324 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.303 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.403 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.348
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:41.985 +62:00:11.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10145 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3483052.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.722 -> 0.303 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4906 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4769 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4769 pairs (4906 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=8.579 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.343 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=0.383 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.425 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=0.300 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.347 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4769 robust_rms_before=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.300 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.346 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.347
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-quadrant 0.347 vs 0.346 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits N_match=4769 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=1252 n_q2=861 n_q3=1616 n_q4=1040 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.158
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.EfoEGAKwAD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=705, bad_region=0, passed=11341
Got 11341 stars (including 10621 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11341 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11337 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11337 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11337 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=9.856 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.258 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=0.361 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.394 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=0.296 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.336 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4894 robust_rms_before=0.693 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.326 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.296 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.378 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.336
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:44.474 +62:00:12.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11341 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3483409.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.693 -> 0.296 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4894 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4762 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4762 pairs (4894 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4762 robust_rms=9.743 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.073 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4762 robust_rms=0.355 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.392 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4762 robust_rms=0.295 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.333 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4762 robust_rms_before=0.295 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.295 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.295 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.333 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.333
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-quadrant 0.333 vs 0.333 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits N_match=4762 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1167 n_q2=869 n_q3=1643 n_q4=1083 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits sigma_overall=0.590 worst_q_ratio=1.436
ref2=Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.145
new1=fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.158
new2=fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.117
reference average sigma_overall=0.497 worst_q_ratio=1.2905
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471_astrometric_residuals.png (4902 matched stars from wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044_astrometric_residuals.png (4905 matched stars from wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024_astrometric_residuals.png (4769 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025_astrometric_residuals.png (4762 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cep-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32115_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 32115_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:43:48.55 +58:48:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cep-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:12.802 +62:01:40.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:41.985 +62:00:11.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:17:12.802 +62:01:40.34
Second-epoch image center 22:17:41.985 +62:00:11.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0622 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:44.474 +62:00:12.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:17:12.802 +62:01:40.34
Second-epoch image center 22:17:44.474 +62:00:12.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0665 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 22:17:41.985 +62:00:11.17
Second-epoch second image center 22:17:44.474 +62:00:12.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00489 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Kx7qVJ1RWD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ofhlvCWGxD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pd0eEXPTVC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2uRw69GGyQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 164019 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 314.9055 to 353.7881 deg, Dec +55.9572 to +67.2917 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 314.9055 to 353.7881 deg, Dec 55.9572 to 67.2917 deg
Loaded 19993 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10125 out of 13724 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13724 out of 164019 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.647700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.647700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 164019 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 314.9055 to 353.7881 deg, Dec +55.9572 to +67.2917 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 314.9055 to 353.7881 deg, Dec 55.9572 to 67.2917 deg
Loaded 19993 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10125 out of 13724 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13724 out of 164019 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 186940 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 315.1675 to 354.1614 deg, Dec +55.5371 to +67.3267 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 315.1675 to 354.1614 deg, Dec 55.5371 to 67.3267 deg
Loaded 21434 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10033 out of 14205 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14205 out of 186940 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 282 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
2.0 pix Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
15.4 mag. Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Kx7qVJ1RWD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=6, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=67, blended=21904, bad_region=0, passed=163946
Got 163946 stars (including 141852 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 163946 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.811 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.582 n_q1=1139 n_q2=1506 n_q3=1065 n_q4=1193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.391
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits -region wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ofhlvCWGxD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=64, blended=25375, bad_region=42, passed=186876
Got 186876 stars (including 161140 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 186876 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 186876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 186876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 186876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=1214 n_q2=1387 n_q3=1177 n_q4=1129 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits -region wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pd0eEXPTVC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=5392, bad_region=41, passed=74145
Got 74145 stars (including 68574 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74145 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=8.784 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.308 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.395 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.437 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.303 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.349 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4905 robust_rms_before=0.304 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.327 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.303 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.349 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.349
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.349 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1309 n_q2=904 n_q3=1586 n_q4=1106 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2uRw69GGyQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=6053, bad_region=43, passed=79628
Got 79628 stars (including 73411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 79628 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5398)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=9.879 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.901 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.393 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=0.300 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.345 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4908 robust_rms_before=0.301 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.308 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.300 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.347 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.345
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.347 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1214 n_q2=931 n_q3=1622 n_q4=1141 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.210
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-17_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_041534_TTUQ1b1x1_3267106_CgXd4Vm8/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cep-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:59:33.47 +67:01:53.5: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:10:30.97 +58:37:34.7: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:45:22.58 +62:54:42.7: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:38:32.72 +57:35:21.7: 14.46 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 23:06:50.35 +56:10:30.4: 14.42 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:45:07.23 +64:04:33.7: 14.32 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:15:59.84 +65:58:30.4: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:39:42.33 +58:24:58.0: 14.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:45:22.58 +62:54:42.7: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:45:07.23 +64:04:33.7: 14.56 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:38:32.72 +57:35:21.7: 14.37 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:39:42.33 +58:24:58.0: 14.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:10:30.97 +58:37:34.7: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:15:59.84 +65:58:30.4: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 23:06:50.35 +56:10:30.4: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:45:22.58 +62:54:42.7: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0000 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:59:33.47 +67:01:53.5: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:39:42.33 +58:24:58.0: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8603 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:38:32.72 +57:35:21.7: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8458 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:45:07.23 +64:04:33.7: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1267 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:06:50.35 +56:10:30.4: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6619 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:10:30.97 +58:37:34.7: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7310 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:15:59.84 +65:58:30.4: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3989 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:59:33.47 +67:01:53.5: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3363 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:41:57.54 +58:46:12.2: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:41:57.54 +58:46:12.2: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:41:57.54 +58:46:12.2: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6159 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 23:20:08.55 +63:22:46.0: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 23:11:47.62 +56:34:59.1: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 23:20:08.55 +63:22:46.0: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 23:11:47.62 +56:34:59.1: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:20:08.55 +63:22:46.0: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4333 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:11:47.62 +56:34:59.1: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1234 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:40:03.05 +66:51:39.5: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:40:03.05 +66:51:39.5: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:33:45.65 +61:47:44.8: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:40:03.05 +66:51:39.5: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2876 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:57:26.67 +67:09:19.2: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:33:45.65 +61:47:44.8: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:33:45.65 +61:47:44.8: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6172 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:57:26.67 +67:09:19.2: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:57:26.67 +67:09:19.2: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3220 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 23:06:00.53 +56:41:33.9: 13.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 23:06:00.53 +56:41:33.9: 13.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:06:00.53 +56:41:33.9: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1975 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:46:41.81 +56:49:47.1: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:46:41.81 +56:49:47.1: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:46:41.81 +56:49:47.1: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8716 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 23:17:47.09 +63:35:24.4: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:44:39.73 +58:12:16.0: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 23:17:47.09 +63:35:24.4: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:17:47.09 +63:35:24.4: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2357 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:44:39.73 +58:12:16.0: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:44:39.73 +58:12:16.0: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2707 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 23:20:10.97 +61:08:55.4: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 23:20:10.97 +61:08:55.4: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:20:10.97 +61:08:55.4: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4285 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:12:11.99 +63:43:23.0: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 23:08:06.48 +56:48:25.4: 14.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 23:11:33.15 +56:27:30.0: 14.81 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:12:11.99 +63:43:23.0: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:12:11.99 +63:43:23.0: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2824 delta=-0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 23:02:30.27 +57:10:15.5: 13.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 23:08:06.48 +56:48:25.4: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:08:06.48 +56:48:25.4: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6612 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 23:11:33.15 +56:27:30.0: 14.79 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:04:27.02 +65:43:58.9: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 23:02:30.27 +57:10:15.5: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:11:33.15 +56:27:30.0: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7527 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:02:30.27 +57:10:15.5: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5868 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:04:27.02 +65:43:58.9: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:04:27.02 +65:43:58.9: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2669 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 23:25:10.21 +62:21:29.3: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:44:31.25 +59:18:37.0: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 23:08:24.70 +56:48:59.8: 14.79 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 23:25:10.21 +62:21:29.3: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:25:10.21 +62:21:29.3: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8205 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:44:31.25 +59:18:37.0: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:44:31.25 +59:18:37.0: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4298 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 23:08:24.70 +56:48:59.8: 14.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:08:24.70 +56:48:59.8: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9054 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:58:23.15 +61:45:51.1: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:53:00.74 +62:37:58.2: 15.36 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:58:23.15 +61:45:51.1: 15.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:58:23.15 +61:45:51.1: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0402 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:56:54.89 +61:53:55.8: 15.45 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:53:00.74 +62:37:58.2: 15.18 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:53:00.74 +62:37:58.2: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.9924 delta=1.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:56:54.89 +61:53:55.8: 15.40 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:56:54.89 +61:53:55.8: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4294 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 23:09:48.59 +56:49:03.3: 13.73 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:44:40.05 +60:37:55.4: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:44:28.37 +60:41:08.2: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:09:23.47 +59:42:17.9: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:58:23.02 +62:37:35.9: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:44:40.05 +60:37:55.4: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 23:09:48.59 +56:49:03.3: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:44:40.05 +60:37:55.4: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6993 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:09:48.59 +56:49:03.3: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8924 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:44:28.37 +60:41:08.2: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:44:28.37 +60:41:08.2: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1888 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:09:23.47 +59:42:17.9: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:58:23.02 +62:37:35.9: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:09:23.47 +59:42:17.9: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1273 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:58:23.02 +62:37:35.9: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3494 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:19:06.60 +63:07:03.4: 14.31 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:19:06.60 +63:07:03.4: 14.42 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:19:06.60 +63:07:03.4: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3645 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:26:37.25 +59:08:42.8: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:26:37.25 +59:08:42.8: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:37.25 +59:08:42.8: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6246 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:50:56.53 +62:29:58.0: 14.60 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:50:56.53 +62:29:58.0: 14.70 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:50:56.53 +62:29:58.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.5187 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:00:43.50 +65:03:46.4: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:54:25.28 +62:17:52.5: 14.51 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:00:43.50 +65:03:46.4: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:00:43.50 +65:03:46.4: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5911 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:42:37.97 +60:29:42.2: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:54:25.28 +62:17:52.5: 14.72 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:54:25.28 +62:17:52.5: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6321 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:42:37.97 +60:29:42.2: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:42:37.97 +60:29:42.2: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3636 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:42:25.33 +60:47:04.7: 14.98 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:42:25.33 +60:47:04.7: 14.47 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:42:25.33 +60:47:04.7: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.5895 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:23:39.27 +63:48:32.9: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:23:39.27 +63:48:32.9: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:23:39.27 +63:48:32.9: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0493 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:37:11.23 +58:17:40.4: 14.32 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:37:11.23 +58:17:40.4: 14.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:37:11.23 +58:17:40.4: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2821 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:09:15.15 +59:43:21.1: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:09:15.15 +59:43:21.1: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:09:15.15 +59:43:21.1: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3297 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:24:37.94 +64:06:55.9: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:24:37.94 +64:06:55.9: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:24:37.94 +64:06:55.9: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2667 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:51:59.30 +62:17:55.2: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:51:59.30 +62:17:55.2: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:51:59.30 +62:17:55.2: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3230 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:40:25.32 +58:21:52.6: 14.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:42:33.04 +61:05:05.4: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:09:00.84 +59:41:57.6: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:40:25.32 +58:21:52.6: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:42:33.04 +61:05:05.4: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:40:25.32 +58:21:52.6: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2619 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:42:33.04 +61:05:05.4: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0707 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:21:17.73 +63:43:40.6: 14.15 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:09:00.84 +59:41:57.6: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:09:00.84 +59:41:57.6: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1587 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:21:17.73 +63:43:40.6: 14.07 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:21:17.73 +63:43:40.6: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1574 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:20:33.15 +63:34:08.4: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:43:34.92 +57:40:51.3: 13.74 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:20:33.15 +63:34:08.4: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:33.15 +63:34:08.4: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9847 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:10:07.47 +60:19:00.0: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:43:34.92 +57:40:51.3: 13.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:43:34.92 +57:40:51.3: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0481 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:10:07.47 +60:19:00.0: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:10:07.47 +60:19:00.0: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1668 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:51:49.89 +62:29:40.2: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 22:42:55.64 +57:37:07.8: 14.15 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:51:49.89 +62:29:40.2: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:51:49.89 +62:29:40.2: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2255 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 22:42:55.64 +57:37:07.8: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:42:55.64 +57:37:07.8: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.9988 delta=1.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-10-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits at 21:57:34.04 +64:57:09.7: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_01-28-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits at 21:57:34.04 +64:57:09.7: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:57:34.04 +64:57:09.7: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9688 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out187088.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out209602.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out209620.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out209706.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out209730.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out209850.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out209942.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103757.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out104372.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106642.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106738.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out110369.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out123123.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out124690.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out131161.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out135159.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out135293.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out142248.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out209878.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21607.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33378.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35344.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73458.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out75155.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 36s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 12s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208951_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 208951_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208962_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 208962_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208963_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 208963_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208976_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 208976_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208977_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 208977_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208978_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 208978_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208986_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 208986_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208995_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 208995_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:51:17.12 +61:03:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208999_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 208999_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209000_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209000_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209007_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209007_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209012_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209012_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209013_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209013_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209014_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209014_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209037_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209037_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209039_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209039_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209046_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209046_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:46:50.89 +65:25:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209057_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209057_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:02:34.99 +57:55:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209058_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209058_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209069_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209069_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:03:14.92 +57:32:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209073_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209073_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:18:14.66 +63:11:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209092_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209092_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209114_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209114_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209128_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209128_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209129_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209129_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209135_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209135_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209140_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209140_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209141_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209141_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:20:54.31 +62:24:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209142_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209142_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209144_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209144_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209152_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209152_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209163_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209163_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209166_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209166_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209177_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209177_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209181_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209181_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209187_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209187_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:03:53.39 +58:12:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209190_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209190_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209196_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209196_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:43:55.79 +58:48:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209202_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209202_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:38:51.38 +57:27:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209206_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209206_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:38:54.91 +56:50:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209210_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209210_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209212_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209212_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209213_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209213_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209218_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209218_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209220_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209220_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209226_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209226_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209229_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209229_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:08:24.87 +56:54:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209232_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209232_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209234_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209234_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209235_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209235_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209244_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209244_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209248_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209248_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209249_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209249_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209252_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209252_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209255_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209255_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209258_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209258_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209260_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209260_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:53:40.50 +62:35:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209265_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209265_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209274_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209274_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209277_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209277_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209278_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209278_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209280_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209280_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209281_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209281_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209283_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209283_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:34:24.79 +58:11:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209287_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209287_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209290_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209290_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209298_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209298_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209299_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209299_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209301_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209301_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209305_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209305_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209307_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209307_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209308_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209308_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209309_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209309_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209311_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209311_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209319_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209319_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209327_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209327_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209336_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209336_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:53:55.37 +58:55:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209338_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209338_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209339_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209339_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209346_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209346_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:57:11.44 +59:56:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209348_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209348_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:05:32.49 +63:35:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209351_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209351_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209352_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209352_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209353_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209353_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209354_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209354_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:41:01.36 +57:09:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209356_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209356_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209360_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209360_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209364_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209364_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209365_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209365_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209367_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209367_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209368_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209368_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209371_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209371_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:38:23.06 +64:15:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209372_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209372_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:09:10.55 +56:14:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209374_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209374_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:54:25.27 +60:49:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209382_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209382_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209383_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209383_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209387_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209387_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209396_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209396_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209397_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209397_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209398_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209398_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:26:52.40 +65:28:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209399_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209399_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209401_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209401_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209404_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209404_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209406_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209406_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209409_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209409_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:04:14.27 +56:27:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209412_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209412_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209414_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209414_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209415_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209415_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209421_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209421_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209431_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209431_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:46:57.10 +58:06:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209435_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209435_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209442_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209442_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209447_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209447_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:26:43.50 +64:36:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209454_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209454_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209457_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209457_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209458_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209458_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209466_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209466_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209468_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209468_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209474_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209474_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209475_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209475_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:05:24.68 +63:35:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209481_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209481_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:51:03.43 +61:46:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209483_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209483_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209485_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209485_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209486_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209486_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209487_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209487_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:06:35.11 +56:23:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209494_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209494_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:59:00.11 +59:49:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209498_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209498_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209500_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209500_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:43:46.34 +61:55:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209506_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209506_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209514_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209514_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209515_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209515_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209517_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209517_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209518_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209518_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209519_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209519_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209520_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209520_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209522_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209522_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209523_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209523_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209525_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209525_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209526_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209526_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209533_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209533_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209534_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209534_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:47:43.59 +65:04:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209537_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209537_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209539_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209539_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209543_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209543_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209544_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209544_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209548_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209548_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209551_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209551_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209552_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209552_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209554_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209554_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209556_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209556_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209560_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209560_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209561_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209561_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209564_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209564_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:04:32.45 +61:23:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209565_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209565_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209566_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209566_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209568_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209568_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209576_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209576_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209578_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209578_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209583_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209583_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209589_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209589_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209602_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209602_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:08:06.48 +56:48:25.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.018 2009138082777611136 347.02747856551 +56.80716190780 14.2291 13.5671 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.018#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209603_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209603_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:18:23.08 +63:14:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209610_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209610_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209615_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209615_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209620_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209620_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:11:33.15 +56:27:30.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.840 2008881827848181632 347.88780619245 +56.45848643718 14.2830 13.6901 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.840#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209622_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209622_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209624_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209624_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209630_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209630_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209632_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209632_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209633_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209633_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209641_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209641_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209648_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209648_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209652_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209652_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209654_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209654_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209663_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209663_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209664_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209664_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209666_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209666_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209669_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209669_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209671_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209671_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209675_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209675_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209676_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209676_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209686_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209686_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209690_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209690_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209691_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209691_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209695_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209695_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209703_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209703_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209706_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209706_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:25:10.21 +62:21:29.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.520 2016502474218650752 351.29043495292 +62.35811524941 14.7268 13.6779 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.520#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209711_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209711_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209713_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209713_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209716_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209716_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209730_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209730_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:08:24.70 +56:48:59.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.688 2009138254576313600 347.10314873270 +56.81675378702 14.5507 13.7986 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.688#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209733_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209733_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:16:23.17 +63:41:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209741_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209741_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209744_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209744_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209746_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209746_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209748_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209748_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209752_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209752_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209754_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209754_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209755_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209755_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:01:12.78 +63:29:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209762_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209762_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209769_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209769_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209772_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209772_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209773_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209773_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209781_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209781_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209791_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209791_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209795_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209795_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209796_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209796_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209803_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209803_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209806_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209806_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209810_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209810_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209829_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209829_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209837_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209837_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209845_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209845_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209850_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209850_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:58:23.15 +61:45:51.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.307 2206934074212630656 344.59628093418 +61.76420885793 14.2408 13.0899 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.307#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209860_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209860_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209866_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209866_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209870_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209870_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209874_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209874_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:37:54.38 +62:03:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209878_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 209878_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209882_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209882_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209886_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209886_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209888_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209888_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209910_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209910_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209914_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209914_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209920_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209920_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209921_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209921_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209935_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209935_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209941_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209941_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209942_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 209942_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:56:54.89 +61:53:55.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.111 2206985746963037184 344.22754984894 +61.89904796937 15.2086 14.0445 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.111#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75155_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 75155_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55588_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 55588_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110369_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 110369_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15969_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 15969_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76166_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 76166_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115263_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 115263_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:36:28.08 +66:47:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192270_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 192270_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142248_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 142248_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132390_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 132390_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123450_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 123450_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:57:35.04 +65:02:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159338_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 159338_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203759_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 203759_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55972_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 55972_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201978_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 201978_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106642_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 106642_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157900_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 157900_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:29:00.61 +65:39:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15213_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 15213_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:11:28.20 +56:43:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123123_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 123123_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161383_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161383_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104372_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 104372_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73458_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 73458_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187878_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 187878_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73278_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 73278_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:41:38.57 +60:27:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187731_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 187731_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187088_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 187088_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:42:25.33 +60:47:04.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.57)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.948 2203785279079060352 325.60537564559 +60.78601084899 13.2030 11.7932 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.948#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108168_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 108168_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:49:45.53 +62:37:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135293_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 135293_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185272_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 185272_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:11:00.04 +59:38:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117773_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 117773_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:40:36.97 +66:30:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33378_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 33378_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15131_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 15131_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55899_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 55899_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131161_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 131161_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178596_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 178596_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178459_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 178459_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:42:33.99 +57:20:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95972_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 95972_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103757_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 103757_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83407_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 83407_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35344_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 35344_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55571_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 55571_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135159_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 135159_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74342_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 74342_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132565_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 132565_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161494_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 161494_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136854_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 136854_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23104_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 23104_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66151_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 66151_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106738_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 106738_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21607_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 21607_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137952_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 137952_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19827_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 19827_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124690_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 124690_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97693_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 97693_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-17_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
