This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.3720 2461298.8720 13.11 07:11:40.47 +16:17:36.3
200.48137 11.72765 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.712 Boliviana 1 -0 2 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:11:40.47 +16:17:36.3: 15.57 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:11:40.47 +16:17:36.3: 15.72 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.61 +/- 0.18
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.8720,13.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.3720 13.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.3720 2461298.8720 13.34 07:14:30.06 +18:20:20.4
198.87056 13.19930 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.308 Polyxo 1 -0 1 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:14:30.06 +18:20:20.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:14:30.06 +18:20:20.4: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.8720,13.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.3720 13.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.3720 2461298.8720 10.45 07:25:41.73 +09:47:32.0
207.97881 12.01446 galactic CMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.1" and 9.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J072542+0947.5
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.900 V Y 0.190 V 2452485.80000 32.350000000000 M2
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:41.73 +09:47:32.0: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:41.73 +09:47:32.0: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.45 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J072542+0947.5,2461298.8720,10.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J072542+0947.5 20260915.3720 10.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.3720 2461298.8720 11.05 07:25:14.94 +09:04:01.3
208.59579 11.59817 galactic CMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J072515+0904.0
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.390 V Y 0.930 V 2452764.80000 105.838573000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:14.94 +09:04:01.3: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:14.94 +09:04:01.3: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J072515+0904.0,2461298.8720,11.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J072515+0904.0 20260915.3720 11.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.3720 2461298.8720 11.47 07:37:45.91 +11:56:04.5
207.30237 15.61149 galactic CMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASAS J073746+1156.1
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.840 V Y 0.770 V 2452670.30000 85.032145000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:37:45.91 +11:56:04.5: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:37:45.91 +11:56:04.5: 12.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J073746+1156.1,2461298.8720,11.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J073746+1156.1 20260915.3720 11.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.3720 2461298.8720 11.03 07:25:11.16 +12:49:50.5
205.11496 13.21355 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J072511+1249.8
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.360 V Y 0.280 V 2452801.90000 101.178894000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:11.16 +12:49:50.5: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:11.16 +12:49:50.5: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J072511+1249.8,2461298.8720,11.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J072511+1249.8 20260915.3720 11.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.3720 2461298.8720 10.69 07:36:46.71 +09:58:13.9
209.03244 14.55048 galactic CMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 9.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J073647+0958.2
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.280 V Y 0.780 V 2452651.20000 103.565294000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:36:46.71 +09:58:13.9: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:36:46.71 +09:58:13.9: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J073647+0958.2,2461298.8720,10.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J073647+0958.2 20260915.3720 10.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.3720 2461298.8720 12.56 07:04:42.17 +09:01:28.8
206.36218 7.02896 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" KM Mon
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.500 pg < 17.200 pg 2430432.00000 256.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:04:42.17 +09:01:28.8: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:04:42.17 +09:01:28.8: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
KM Mon,2461298.8720,12.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
KM Mon 20260915.3720 12.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.3720 2461298.8720 10.07 07:27:44.07 +09:19:03.8
208.63999 12.25941 galactic CMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" CH CMi
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.100 V 12.500 V 2452787.70000 131.300000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:27:44.07 +09:19:03.8: 11.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:27:44.07 +09:19:03.8: 11.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.12 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CH CMi,2461298.8720,10.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CH CMi 20260915.3720 10.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461298.87242703 15.09.2026 08:56:07.695 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24807
Objects passed selection criteria: 24744
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18347.5
Average stars matched: 17998 (98.0951 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 252288 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 15 03:58:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461298.87242703 15.09.2026 08:56:07.695 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 137
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 45 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 167989
Objects passed selection criteria: 167535
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 129395
Average stars matched: 126369 (97.6618 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 638792 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 15 03:59:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461298.87147585
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:38.852 +13:58:50.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:38.852 +13:58:50.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0284 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Image size: 944.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.741 +13:59:26.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:41.741 +13:59:26.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0158 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:38.852 +13:58:50.95
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:41.741 +13:59:26.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01530 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zabfXiPiDF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hzakBMaQRu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kCukG2a3Bh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZeINXhdv1Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.907000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.907000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec +8.5626 to +19.2813 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec 8.5626 to 19.2813 deg
Loaded 18669 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13893 out of 14989 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14989 out of 25465 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.8 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
2.8 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.0 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.zabfXiPiDF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, bad_region=0, passed=28861
Got 28861 stars (including 25451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4815 stars left (next iteration limit 5297)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4815 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=1312 n_q2=1159 n_q3=1286 n_q4=1058 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hzakBMaQRu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, bad_region=1, passed=25458
Got 25458 stars (including 23221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 4805 stars left (next iteration limit 5284)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4805 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.777 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.790 n_q1=963 n_q2=1380 n_q3=1031 n_q4=1431 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kCukG2a3Bh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=479, bad_region=1, passed=9675
Got 9675 stars (including 9183 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9675 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4755 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4755 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4755 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4755 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4755 stars left (next iteration limit 5230)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4755 robust_rms=7.347 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.082 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4755 robust_rms=0.712 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=2.717 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4755 robust_rms=0.566 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.208 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4755 robust_rms_before=1.811 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.528 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.566 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.721 worst_quadrant_rms_after=1.208
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.721 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits N_match=4755 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.718 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.579 n_q1=1478 n_q2=738 n_q3=1828 n_q4=711 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.387
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZeINXhdv1Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=478, bad_region=0, passed=9875
Got 9875 stars (including 9390 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9875 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4755 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4755 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4755 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4755 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4755 stars left (next iteration limit 5230)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4755 robust_rms=7.410 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=18.911 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4755 robust_rms=0.644 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=2.503 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4755 robust_rms=0.545 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.035 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4755 robust_rms_before=1.602 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.501 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.545 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.699 worst_quadrant_rms_after=1.035
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.699 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits N_match=4755 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.706 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.545 n_q1=1481 n_q2=716 n_q3=1865 n_q4=693 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.453
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.456 worst_q_ratio=1.254
ref2=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits sigma_overall=0.623 worst_q_ratio=1.268
new1=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits sigma_overall=0.518 worst_q_ratio=1.387
new2=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits sigma_overall=0.486 worst_q_ratio=1.453
reference average sigma_overall=0.5395 worst_q_ratio=1.261
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (4815 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034_astrometric_residuals.png (4805 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.57 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335_astrometric_residuals.png (4755 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336_astrometric_residuals.png (4755 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30938_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 30938_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:10.61 +12:35:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30939_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 30939_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:04.56 +18:15:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30940_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 30940_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:36.14 +17:50:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31176_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 31176_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:55.62 +12:58:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31179_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 31179_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.64 +10:45:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03781_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 03781_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.63 +10:01:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08602_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 08602_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:00.38 +11:44:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09963_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 09963_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:50.08 +12:12:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01206_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 01206_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:38.76 +09:16:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08703_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 08703_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:47.64 +12:00:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:38.852 +13:58:50.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:38.852 +13:58:50.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0284 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Image size: 944.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.741 +13:59:26.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:41.741 +13:59:26.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0158 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:38.852 +13:58:50.95
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:41.741 +13:59:26.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01530 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IF03H3x8vh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GxqhfXdqbx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits &> /tmp/tmp.odqyXVbAwr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E1uTAoEHEA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.747800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.747800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec +8.5565 to +19.2859 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec 8.5565 to 19.2859 deg
Loaded 18692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11904 out of 16168 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16168 out of 174030 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 120 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.2 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.IF03H3x8vh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=64, blended=33805, bad_region=0, passed=208473
Got 208473 stars (including 174370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1196 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1203 n_q4=1161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GxqhfXdqbx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=102, blended=23358, bad_region=2, passed=173928
Got 173928 stars (including 150412 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4795 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4795 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.729 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.784 n_q1=989 n_q2=1366 n_q3=1028 n_q4=1412 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.odqyXVbAwr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3956, bad_region=9, passed=68320
Got 68320 stars (including 64270 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68320 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68316 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4755 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68316 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4754 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68316 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4754 stars left (next iteration limit 5228)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4754 robust_rms=7.364 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=18.516 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4754 robust_rms=0.717 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=2.724 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4754 robust_rms=0.564 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.187 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4754 robust_rms_before=1.800 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.520 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.564 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.726 worst_quadrant_rms_after=1.187
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.726 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits N_match=4754 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.716 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.566 n_q1=1483 n_q2=730 n_q3=1802 n_q4=739 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.393
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.E1uTAoEHEA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4074, bad_region=12, passed=69555
Got 69555 stars (including 65384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69555 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4761 stars left (next iteration limit 5236)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=7.486 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=18.066 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=0.657 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=2.505 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=0.543 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.031 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4761 robust_rms_before=1.599 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.492 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.543 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.687 worst_quadrant_rms_after=1.031
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.687 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits N_match=4761 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.705 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.549 n_q1=1472 n_q2=719 n_q3=1842 n_q4=728 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.464
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-54-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_035654_TTUQ1b1x1_500279_C1xC1Lx1/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:45:02.47 +17:46:03.0: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:25.13 +18:13:08.9: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:39:39.74 +13:46:58.0: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:02.90 +16:23:45.5: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:01:22.51 +16:39:19.2: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:47:19.95 +15:29:44.9: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:30:28.24 +16:15:51.6: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:25.13 +18:13:08.9: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:39:39.74 +13:46:58.0: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:45:02.47 +17:46:03.0: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:02.90 +16:23:45.5: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:01:22.51 +16:39:19.2: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:25.13 +18:13:08.9: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1041 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:39.74 +13:46:58.0: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5225 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:02.47 +17:46:03.0: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5008 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:22.51 +16:39:19.2: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0751 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:02.90 +16:23:45.5: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6728 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:36:11.29 +14:32:59.4: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:44:48.27 +15:48:06.4: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:30:28.24 +16:15:51.6: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:47:19.95 +15:29:44.9: 13.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:28.24 +16:15:51.6: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4106 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:19.95 +15:29:44.9: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2607 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:36:11.29 +14:32:59.4: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:11.29 +14:32:59.4: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1084 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:44:48.27 +15:48:06.4: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:48.27 +15:48:06.4: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9133 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:04:04.18 +18:29:25.4: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:43:04.83 +13:39:58.0: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:43:04.83 +13:39:58.0: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:04.83 +13:39:58.0: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9203 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:04:04.18 +18:29:25.4: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:04.18 +18:29:25.4: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5156 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:40:09.27 +16:44:01.9: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:58:17.03 +14:15:29.9: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:40:09.27 +16:44:01.9: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:40:09.27 +16:44:01.9: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9934 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:51:13.75 +15:03:06.5: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:58:17.03 +14:15:29.9: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:17.03 +14:15:29.9: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5337 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:45:33.73 +15:28:40.2: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:51:13.75 +15:03:06.5: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:13.75 +15:03:06.5: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6587 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:45:33.73 +15:28:40.2: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:33.73 +15:28:40.2: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0110 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:58:36.51 +17:52:17.9: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:38.60 +16:09:35.2: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:20:07.47 +16:09:36.6: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:56:11.38 +18:48:55.0: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:58:36.51 +17:52:17.9: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:36.51 +17:52:17.9: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9887 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:12:21.53 +18:38:32.5: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:38.60 +16:09:35.2: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:38.60 +16:09:35.2: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5516 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:47:02.62 +16:15:42.1: 13.63 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:20:07.47 +16:09:36.6: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:07.47 +16:09:36.6: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6762 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:54:26.34 +14:38:33.7: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:56:11.38 +18:48:55.0: 13.53 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:11.38 +18:48:55.0: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2832 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:12:21.53 +18:38:32.5: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:21.53 +18:38:32.5: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9230 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:47:02.62 +16:15:42.1: 13.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:02.62 +16:15:42.1: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5045 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:11:40.47 +16:17:36.3: 15.57 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:54:26.34 +14:38:33.7: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:26.34 +14:38:33.7: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2761 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:14:30.06 +18:20:20.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:11:40.47 +16:17:36.3: 15.72 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.61 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:11:40.47 +16:17:36.3: ref_mag=15.61 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.1096 delta=2.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:14:30.06 +18:20:20.4: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:41.73 +09:47:32.0: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:14.94 +09:04:01.3: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:41.73 +09:47:32.0: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:25:41.73 +09:47:32.0: ref_mag=11.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4484 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:36:00.92 +11:18:13.8: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:14.94 +09:04:01.3: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:25:14.94 +09:04:01.3: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0454 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:36:00.92 +11:18:13.8: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:00.92 +11:18:13.8: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2379 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:37:45.91 +11:56:04.5: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:04:42.17 +09:01:28.8: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:11.16 +12:49:50.5: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:36:46.71 +09:58:13.9: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:37:45.91 +11:56:04.5: 12.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:37:45.91 +11:56:04.5: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4669 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:04:42.17 +09:01:28.8: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:11.16 +12:49:50.5: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:04:42.17 +09:01:28.8: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.5584 delta=1.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:25:11.16 +12:49:50.5: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0290 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:36:46.71 +09:58:13.9: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:36:46.71 +09:58:13.9: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.6738 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:27:44.07 +09:19:03.8: 11.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:27:44.07 +09:19:03.8: 11.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.12 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:27:44.07 +09:19:03.8: ref_mag=11.12 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0747 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05463.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out06357.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out10626.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20003.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22890.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229934.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230069.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out61873.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81207.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227459_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227459_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:59.17 +15:31:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227467_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227467_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:35.85 +13:20:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227469_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227469_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227473_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227473_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227483_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227483_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227484_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227484_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:37.11 +16:03:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227485_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227485_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227486_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227486_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:57.97 +12:43:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227493_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227493_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:35.73 +10:34:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227494_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227494_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227495_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227495_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227498_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227498_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:12.65 +18:20:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227499_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227499_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227509_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227509_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:58.74 +12:32:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227513_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227513_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:18.27 +18:02:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227515_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227515_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227519_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227519_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:31.38 +13:59:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227520_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227520_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227522_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227522_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:06.36 +17:52:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227524_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227524_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227527_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227527_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:48.77 +15:17:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227530_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227530_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227531_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227531_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:44.20 +16:43:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227532_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227532_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:32.22 +13:05:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227533_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227533_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:50.55 +12:12:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227534_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227534_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:10.91 +18:24:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227535_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227535_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:09.45 +12:21:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227540_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227540_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:50.47 +17:58:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227541_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227541_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:10.57 +12:35:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227873_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227873_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:56.14 +13:15:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227919_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 227919_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:09.83 +16:09:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228227_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228227_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:25.66 +16:11:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228298_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228298_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:56.05 +16:27:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228474_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228474_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:59.40 +09:55:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228504_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228504_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:48.30 +18:40:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228558_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228558_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:00.01 +14:14:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228602_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228602_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228653_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228653_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:58.15 +13:45:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228693_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228693_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:40.69 +16:56:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228703_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228703_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:08.01 +16:04:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228748_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228748_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228753_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228753_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:04.34 +09:51:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228755_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228755_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:28.01 +16:25:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228780_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228780_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:19.34 +13:20:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228794_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228794_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:10.98 +17:50:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228796_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228796_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:35.05 +11:24:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228804_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228804_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:33.30 +17:27:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228810_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228810_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:39.99 +16:32:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228816_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228816_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228823_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228823_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:36.44 +16:33:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228832_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228832_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:37.62 +10:34:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228914_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228914_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:19.42 +18:18:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228991_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228991_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:02.66 +09:18:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228999_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 228999_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229015_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229015_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:05.24 +16:42:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229031_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229031_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:36.53 +18:56:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229039_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229039_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:18.74 +18:49:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229100_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229100_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.07 +15:07:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229106_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229106_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:50.01 +12:33:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229122_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229122_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:31.22 +10:12:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229123_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229123_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:43.12 +15:59:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229158_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229158_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:55.91 +17:47:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229203_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229203_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:48.19 +10:42:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229265_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229265_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229301_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229301_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.60 +10:36:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229354_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229354_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:47.32 +10:59:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229398_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229398_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:21.27 +12:06:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229405_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229405_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229431_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229431_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:19.97 +16:06:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229475_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229475_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:43.58 +13:46:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229490_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229490_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229513_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229513_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:23.36 +18:07:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229566_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229566_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:29.11 +12:08:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229581_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229581_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229605_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229605_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.71 +15:48:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229646_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229646_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229668_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229668_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:51.65 +09:15:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229689_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229689_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229780_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229780_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:45.06 +16:08:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229790_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229790_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229821_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229821_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:50.45 +15:07:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229828_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 229828_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:38.91 +15:33:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229934_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
Preparing report for the candidate 229934_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230057_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 230057_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:57.79 +13:46:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230069_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
Preparing report for the candidate 230069_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230152_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 230152_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:43.88 +16:41:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11952_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 11952_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:38.77 +09:16:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12184_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 12184_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:39.13 +09:11:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72111_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 72111_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:50.70 +12:22:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20003_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
Preparing report for the candidate 20003_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68285_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 68285_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:50.06 +12:12:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58482_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 58482_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:00.34 +11:44:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05463_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
Preparing report for the candidate 05463_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55452_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 55452_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:14.88 +11:30:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38643_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 38643_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:55.17 +10:38:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51429_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 51429_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:44.13 +11:24:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221042_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 221042_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:29.69 +13:18:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220993_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 220993_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26007_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 26007_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:57.20 +09:50:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190647_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 190647_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:33.26 +16:51:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41021_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 41021_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.67 +10:45:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25123_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 25123_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:33.10 +10:03:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120851_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 120851_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:55.91 +14:28:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61873_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
Preparing report for the candidate 61873_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73357_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 73357_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:03.61 +12:26:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81207_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
Preparing report for the candidate 81207_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22890_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
Preparing report for the candidate 22890_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06357_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
Preparing report for the candidate 06357_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.46 +13:56:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10626_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
Preparing report for the candidate 10626_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44165_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 44165_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:47.89 +11:01:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175524_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175524_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:24.46 +17:53:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.64 +10:01:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05994_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 05994_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:05.09 +09:02:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45282_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 45282_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:27.43 +11:00:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48859_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 48859_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:08.70 +11:12:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58480_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 58480_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:57.98 +11:40:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145805_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 145805_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:36.42 +15:49:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66828_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 66828_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:47.64 +12:00:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190235_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 190235_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_03-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
