This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 15.2918* 05 21 07.63 +23 38 19.8 10.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461298.7918,10.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260915.2918 10.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.2918 2461298.7918 11.40 05:00:01.31 +24:37:30.8
177.84915 -10.83627 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 1.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 0 1 1 11.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:00:01.31 +24:37:30.8: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:00:01.31 +24:37:30.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 15.2918* 05 00 01.31 +24 37 30.8 11.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7918,11.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2918 11.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 15.2918* 05 21 07.63 +23 38 19.8 10.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461298.7918,10.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260915.2918 10.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.2918 2461298.7918 12.90 05:43:49.41 +24:13:43.1
183.80683 -2.80029 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia -1 -0 1 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:49.41 +24:13:43.1: 15.92 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:49.41 +24:13:43.1: 15.66 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.77 +/- 0.18
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 15.2918* 05 43 49.41 +24 13 43.1 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7918,12.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2918 12.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.2918 2461298.7918 13.50 04:59:57.65 +23:10:44.8
179.02374 -11.71065 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula -1 -0 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 04:59:57.65 +23:10:44.8: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 04:59:57.65 +23:10:44.8: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 15.2918* 04 59 57.65 +23 10 44.8 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7918,13.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2918 13.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.2918 2461298.7918 13.12 05:23:36.67 +17:17:02.8
187.17852 -10.50185 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.53 Kalypso -0 -0 0 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:23:36.67 +17:17:02.8: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:23:36.67 +17:17:02.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 15.2918* 05 23 36.67 +17 17 02.8 13.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7918,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2918 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.2918 2461298.7918 12.99 05:43:00.13 +20:32:09.2
186.86488 -4.88927 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 1.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J054300.23+203212.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.260 V 14.600 V 2457679.00000 51.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:00.13 +20:32:09.2: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:00.13 +20:32:09.2: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 15.2918* 05 43 00.13 +20 32 09.2 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J054300.23+203212.4,2461298.7918,12.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J054300.23+203212.4 20260915.2918 12.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.2918 2461298.7918 12.52 05:56:59.75 +22:30:52.8
186.82827 -1.08093 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 1.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0556593+223051
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.666 r Y 1.024 r 2458583.62420 434.689650300000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:56:59.75 +22:30:52.8: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:56:59.75 +22:30:52.8: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 15.2918* 05 56 59.75 +22 30 52.8 12.5 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0556593+223051,2461298.7918,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0556593+223051 20260915.2918 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.2918 2461298.7918 11.69 05:44:19.53 +23:56:13.6
184.11566 -2.85479 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 1.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J054419.50+235613.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.040 g Y 0.530 g 2458762.02000 76.290000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:44:19.53 +23:56:13.6: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:44:19.53 +23:56:13.6: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 15.2918* 05 44 19.53 +23 56 13.6 11.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J054419.50+235613.8,2461298.7918,11.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J054419.50+235613.8 20260915.2918 11.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.2918 2461298.7918 11.76 05:31:06.31 +19:53:28.6
185.92941 -7.59864 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 1.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J053106.19+195328.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.700 g Y 0.310 g 2459471.84900 82.290000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:31:06.31 +19:53:28.6: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:31:06.31 +19:53:28.6: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 15.2918* 05 31 06.31 +19 53 28.6 11.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J053106.19+195328.8,2461298.7918,11.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J053106.19+195328.8 20260915.2918 11.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461298.79206664 15.09.2026 07:00:24.558 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20272
Objects passed selection criteria: 20178
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14621.2
Average stars matched: 14418.2 (98.6116 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 245512 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 15 02:07:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461298.79206664 15.09.2026 07:00:24.558 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 197
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 45 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 150527
Objects passed selection criteria: 150124
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 107343
Average stars matched: 103911 (96.8028 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 616224 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 15 02:08:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461298.79155479
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.668 +22:01:38.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:21.668 +22:01:38.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0290 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.519 +22:01:45.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:21.519 +22:01:45.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0308 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:21.668 +22:01:38.00
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:21.519 +22:01:45.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00206 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z1fSL9yXAP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tUBlo759db
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RwDInSGGPs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CrwNixxEHM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.z1fSL9yXAP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tUBlo759db (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.RwDInSGGPs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=288, bad_region=0, passed=7420
Got 7420 stars (including 7127 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4790 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4793 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4722 stars left (next iteration limit 5194)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=7.755 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.339 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=0.729 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.943 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=0.556 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.745 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4722 robust_rms_before=1.643 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.523 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.556 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.650 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.745
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.650 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits N_match=4722 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.634 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.463 n_q1=1039 n_q2=1230 n_q3=916 n_q4=1537 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CrwNixxEHM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=296, bad_region=0, passed=7487
Got 7487 stars (including 7187 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4718 stars left (next iteration limit 5190)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4718 robust_rms=7.895 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.670 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4718 robust_rms=0.725 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.974 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4718 robust_rms=0.561 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.790 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4718 robust_rms_before=1.529 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.519 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.561 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.633 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.790
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.633 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits N_match=4718 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.489 n_q1=1023 n_q2=1234 n_q3=915 n_q4=1546 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.225
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.482 worst_q_ratio=1.251
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits sigma_overall=0.518 worst_q_ratio=1.224
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits sigma_overall=0.503 worst_q_ratio=1.225
reference average sigma_overall=0.4295 worst_q_ratio=1.243
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4714 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278_astrometric_residuals.png (4722 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279_astrometric_residuals.png (4718 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:00:01.31 +24:37:30.8: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:42.68 +25:11:11.2: 9.95 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:00:01.31 +24:37:30.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:42.68 +25:11:11.2: 9.94 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.94 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:19:42.68 +25:11:11.2: ref_mag=9.94 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4008 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30743.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30667_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 30667_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30696_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 30696_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30743_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 30743_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30779_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 30779_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:09.66 +19:28:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.43 +20:22:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16428_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 16428_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:25.44 +19:25:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.18 +17:53:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18264_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 18264_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:41.36 +18:35:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02547_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 02547_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.58 +25:49:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.53 +17:54:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03444_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 03444_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.83 +25:25:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22152_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 22152_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:40.80 +16:57:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.97 +20:10:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 20601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.12 +17:45:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.40 +23:51:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:00:01.31 +24:37:30.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.668 +22:01:38.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:21.668 +22:01:38.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0290 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.519 +22:01:45.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:21.519 +22:01:45.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0308 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:21.668 +22:01:38.00
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:21.519 +22:01:45.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00206 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SEtP1TGAFe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LpsIfY8TPe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EBoJmP8TQx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ygb99up53Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 181 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SEtP1TGAFe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LpsIfY8TPe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4711 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4711 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=978 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.EBoJmP8TQx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2155, bad_region=5, passed=50446
Got 50446 stars (including 48208 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50446 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50446 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4781 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4717 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50446 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4717 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50446 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4717 stars left (next iteration limit 5189)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4717 robust_rms=8.159 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.049 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4717 robust_rms=0.729 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.955 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4717 robust_rms=0.554 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.746 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4717 robust_rms_before=1.620 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.500 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.554 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.631 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.746
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.631 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits N_match=4717 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=1049 n_q2=1168 n_q3=951 n_q4=1549 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ygb99up53Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2206, bad_region=6, passed=50533
Got 50533 stars (including 48253 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50533 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4774 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4775 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4715 stars left (next iteration limit 5186)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4715 robust_rms=8.294 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.449 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4715 robust_rms=0.712 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.955 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4715 robust_rms=0.554 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.795 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4715 robust_rms_before=1.510 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.499 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.554 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.614 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.795
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.614 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits N_match=4715 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.614 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=1042 n_q2=1176 n_q3=943 n_q4=1554 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-59-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_020109_TTUQ1b1x1_1129103_zCxWqKxr/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:00:40.37 +24:21:53.6: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:11:57.33 +24:41:59.7: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:14:59.66 +27:10:17.0: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:07.88 +21:52:55.6: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:12:57.87 +19:26:32.1: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:55:21.58 +23:47:17.1: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:00:40.37 +24:21:53.6: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:11:57.33 +24:41:59.7: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:14:59.66 +27:10:17.0: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:57.33 +24:41:59.7: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3118 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:00:40.37 +24:21:53.6: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6420 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:14:59.66 +27:10:17.0: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7753 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:07.88 +21:52:55.6: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:12:57.87 +19:26:32.1: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:07.88 +21:52:55.6: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2308 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:57.87 +19:26:32.1: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9996 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:55:21.58 +23:47:17.1: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:21.58 +23:47:17.1: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4520 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:07:15.57 +25:16:10.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:07:15.57 +25:16:10.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:15.57 +25:16:10.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:24.75 +16:31:52.0: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:35:02.38 +24:18:48.4: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:56.24 +21:49:36.7: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:49.41 +24:13:43.1: 15.92 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:24.75 +16:31:52.0: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:24.75 +16:31:52.0: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1190 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:35:02.38 +24:18:48.4: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:02.38 +24:18:48.4: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8034 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:56.24 +21:49:36.7: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:49.41 +24:13:43.1: 15.66 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:56.24 +21:49:36.7: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0631 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.77 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:43:49.41 +24:13:43.1: ref_mag=15.77 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=12.8852 delta=2.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:59.79 +22:34:33.6: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:59.79 +22:34:33.6: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:59.79 +22:34:33.6: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7499 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:58.87 +16:30:44.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.67 +25:20:30.6: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 04:59:57.65 +23:10:44.8: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:58.87 +16:30:44.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:58.87 +16:30:44.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.67 +25:20:30.6: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.67 +25:20:30.6: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1890 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 04:59:57.65 +23:10:44.8: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:23:36.67 +17:17:02.8: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:23:36.67 +17:17:02.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:00.13 +20:32:09.2: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:56:59.75 +22:30:52.8: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:00.13 +20:32:09.2: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:43:00.13 +20:32:09.2: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9852 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:56:59.75 +22:30:52.8: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:56:59.75 +22:30:52.8: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5158 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:54.41 +21:13:21.5: 13.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:54.41 +21:13:21.5: 13.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:42:54.41 +21:13:21.5: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3966 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:44:19.53 +23:56:13.6: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:32:33.08 +22:49:46.5: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:31:06.31 +19:53:28.6: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:44:19.53 +23:56:13.6: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:44:19.53 +23:56:13.6: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6846 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:33.08 +22:49:46.5: 13.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:31:06.31 +19:53:28.6: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:33.08 +22:49:46.5: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0970 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:31:06.31 +19:53:28.6: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7507 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:55:56.08 +22:51:50.2: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:55:56.08 +22:51:50.2: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:56.08 +22:51:50.2: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7825 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out105378.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out116971.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191189.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191347.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191410.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out49132.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out68483.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190568_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190568_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190573_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190573_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190588_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190588_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190589_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190589_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190616_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190616_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190617_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190617_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190621_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 190621_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190632_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190632_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190646_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190646_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:58.94 +26:19:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190655_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190655_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190669_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190669_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:01.31 +24:37:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190672_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190672_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190692_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190692_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190740_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190740_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190788_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190788_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190798_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190798_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190836_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190836_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190842_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190842_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.15 +22:38:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190845_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190845_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:49.76 +26:44:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190866_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190866_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190868_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190868_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190874_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190874_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.83 +23:48:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190875_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190875_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.96 +26:25:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190887_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190887_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.66 +22:27:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190889_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190889_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.82 +25:55:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190921_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190921_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190924_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190924_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190942_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190942_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:01.80 +26:45:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190954_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190954_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.74 +19:34:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190956_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190956_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:03.09 +23:18:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190965_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190965_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:41.74 +23:02:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 190970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:37.02 +25:05:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191004_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191004_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191024_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191024_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191026_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191026_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:09.96 +18:33:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191041_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191041_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:39.98 +26:04:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191042_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191042_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:21.01 +23:48:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191062_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191062_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:24.48 +18:37:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191094_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191094_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.04 +18:33:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191096_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191096_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.95 +26:10:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191105_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191105_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191112_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191112_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.96 +20:10:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191114_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191114_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:19.61 +24:25:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191129_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191129_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:56.14 +24:36:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191134_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191134_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:20.39 +22:03:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191138_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191138_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191150_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191150_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191161_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191161_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:36.67 +22:27:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191162_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191162_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.73 +22:40:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.48 +21:37:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191173_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191173_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.29 +18:59:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191182_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191182_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191189_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 191189_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191191_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191191_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.79 +22:03:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191193_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191193_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191204_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191204_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:23.14 +25:24:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191205_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191205_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:40.16 +20:26:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191212_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191212_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191224_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191224_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:23.23 +26:25:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191230_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191230_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191241_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191241_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.94 +26:42:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191242_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191242_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.05 +23:12:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191257_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191257_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:13.78 +21:51:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191258_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191258_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191262_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191262_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.24 +23:00:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191264_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191264_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191289_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191289_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.65 +20:02:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191303_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191303_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191307_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191307_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191341_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191341_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:48.64 +25:09:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191347_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 191347_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191364_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191364_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.29 +20:53:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191386_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191386_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191389_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191389_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191395_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191395_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191397_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191397_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:11.55 +25:41:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191399_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191399_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.66 +25:22:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:40.40 +20:26:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191410_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 191410_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191470_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191470_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191477_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191477_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191487_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191487_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191504_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191504_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.76 +23:11:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191527_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191527_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191533_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191533_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191538_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 191538_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 94587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:26.61 +21:00:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 105378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166265_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 166265_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:31.17 +17:45:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68483_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 68483_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 56378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:34.80 +23:22:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:50.63 +21:45:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:12.60 +19:30:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136606_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 136606_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:01.34 +20:16:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114749_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 114749_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:43.72 +20:01:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98078_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 98078_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:16.14 +20:53:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:18.07 +24:59:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66560_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 66560_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.87 +23:10:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.43 +26:13:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 34402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.07 +24:53:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156830_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 156830_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180328_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 180328_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:18.57 +18:54:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180150_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 180150_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:13.99 +23:00:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94504_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 94504_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:25.57 +21:10:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93856_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 93856_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86301_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 86301_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:17.57 +21:43:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74785_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 74785_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:29.28 +22:03:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.19 +24:10:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67949_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 67949_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:46.84 +22:35:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158119_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 158119_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:04.17 +17:07:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54813_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 54813_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:52.47 +23:35:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.27 +25:40:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:37.34 +20:19:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34058_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 34058_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:44.49 +24:57:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167486_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 167486_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:33.76 +17:49:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.74 +19:21:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86369_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 86369_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:16.62 +21:31:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32270_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32270_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:11.25 +24:55:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:56.52 +21:25:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:20.23 +17:59:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99311_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 99311_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:53.31 +20:56:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:30.70 +22:47:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157320_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 157320_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:47.20 +17:10:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40163_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 40163_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:52.11 +24:29:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 49132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66104_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 66104_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116971_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 116971_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:36.14 +25:59:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138780_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 138780_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:10.62 +19:08:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.22 +20:22:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:04.41 +25:01:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.44 +17:54:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09594_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 09594_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:39.99 +26:28:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33497_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 33497_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:08.06 +24:51:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.45 +20:22:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.11 +17:45:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 65120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:25.85 +22:48:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:25.43 +19:25:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.17 +17:53:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 61658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:20.94 +23:05:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 153854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:40.80 +16:57:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.13 +21:51:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.79 +25:25:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 62770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.40 +23:51:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:48.53 +19:44:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135311_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 135311_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:34.86 +18:52:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.92 +21:13:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130073_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 130073_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:41.37 +18:35:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:15.53 +20:28:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07742_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 07742_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:12.93 +26:34:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 79132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:35.95 +21:55:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18807_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 18807_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.58 +25:49:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65216_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 65216_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:38.30 +22:51:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.96 +20:10:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 34493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.70 +25:00:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84793_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 84793_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:38.23 +21:56:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108697_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 108697_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.80 +20:28:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96330_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 96330_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:38.57 +21:08:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 105095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:39.27 +20:41:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117978_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 117978_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:12.80 +18:35:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129379_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 129379_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:31.61 +18:32:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 101378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:22.24 +20:52:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120138_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 120138_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:10.15 +17:57:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39648_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 39648_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:00.76 +24:33:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116845_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 116845_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:23.32 +19:52:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157917_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 157917_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:01.71 +17:14:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160317_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 160317_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:26.07 +17:23:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 155021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:14.29 +17:03:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 155271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:03.66 +17:02:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.39 +20:16:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14039_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 14039_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:59.55 +25:57:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:07.06 +23:15:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.13 +20:08:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 166587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:26.05 +17:43:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_02-00-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
