Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 15.2692  2461298.7692  11.43  23:59:03.31 -07:18:19.8
 88.46070 -66.60484 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 9.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
106 Dione                   -0      0       0  11.5     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:59:03.31 -07:18:19.8:  15.31 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:59:03.31 -07:18:19.8:  15.41 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits -crosshair 4652.34082 4823.97949 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -crosshair 4645.89746 4817.32910 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.26923 23 59 03.31 -07 18 19.8          11.4 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.26895 23 59 03.31 -07 18 19.8          11.4 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.26950 23 59 03.32 -07 18 19.7          11.4 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 09 15.2692*  23 59 03.31 -07 18 19.8  11.4 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7692,11.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2692 11.43CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 15.2692  2461298.7692  11.85  23:47:03.95 -13:32:04.5
 71.85812 -69.73149 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
118 Peitho                  -0      0       0  11.9     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:47:03.95 -13:32:04.5:  15.22 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:47:03.95 -13:32:04.5:  15.26 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits -crosshair 2870.23242 1050.08105 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -crosshair 2863.74707 1043.27686 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.26923 23 47 03.95 -13 32 04.5          11.8 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.26895 23 47 03.97 -13 32 04.4          11.8 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.26950 23 47 03.93 -13 32 04.6          11.8 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 09 15.2692*  23 47 03.95 -13 32 04.5  11.8 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7692,11.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2692 11.85CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 15.2692  2461298.7692  13.48  00:10:16.01 -10:51:11.4
 90.20343 -71.06042 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 9.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1133 Lugduna                 -0     -0       0  13.5    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:10:16.01 -10:51:11.4:  15.46 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:10:16.01 -10:51:11.4:  15.52 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits -crosshair 6308.72998 2665.93018 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -crosshair 6302.13623 2659.08545 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.26923 00 10 16.01 -10 51 11.4          13.5 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.26895 00 10 16.03 -10 51 10.3          13.4 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.26950 00 10 15.99 -10 51 12.4          13.5 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 09 15.2692*  00 10 16.01 -10 51 11.4  13.5 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7692,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2692 13.48CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 15.2692  2461298.7692  14.06  23:32:31.01 -06:02:18.0
 77.71709 -61.77021 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 9.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
981 Martina                  1     -0       1  14.1     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:32:31.01 -06:02:18.0:  15.10 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:32:31.01 -06:02:18.0:  15.21 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits -crosshair 629.97150 5590.35498 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -crosshair 623.08063 5584.08643 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.26923 23 32 31.01 -06 02 18.0          14.1 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.26895 23 32 31.06 -06 02 19.5          14.0 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.26950 23 32 30.96 -06 02 16.4          14.1 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 09 15.2692*  23 32 31.01 -06 02 18.0  14.1 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7692,14.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2692 14.06CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last  image: 2461298.76950490 15.09.2026 06:27:55.223   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.80
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  3421
Objects passed selection criteria:  3420
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.8    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.8    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 3311.75
Average stars matched: 3253.25 (98.2336 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   230604 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Sep 15 01:53:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last  image: 2461298.76950490 15.09.2026 06:27:55.223   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 28
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  18793
Objects passed selection criteria:  18735
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.8    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.8    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 18248.2
Average stars matched: 17368.2 (95.1776 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   246836 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Sep 15 01:54:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 861662 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 861662 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits_preview.png'

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits


renamed 'Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits_preview.png'

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 765.4159
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.5498
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1595.9396
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 518.2458
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1595.3629
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 518.6523
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.08506
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     27.6200008392334 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 27.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-15T01:27:07.0302090' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-15T06:27:07.0302090' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61298.2688313657 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-15T06:27:16.9341817' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61298.2689459953 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.995877704474 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -10.0019612396286 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     45.1194444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     164.256666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.40989960735583 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20478 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20478 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     27.6200008392334 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     27.6200008392334 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 45.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                900.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 27.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 49.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            23.801904 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             15.50124 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits :)

Spent 0.799293 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     27.5599994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 27.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-15T01:27:55.2236143' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-15T06:27:55.2236143' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61298.2693891553 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-15T06:28:05.1805677' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61298.2695043981 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =      359.99587768533 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -10.0019612390311 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     45.1641666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     164.529166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.40880890490039 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20478 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20478 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     27.5599994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     27.5599994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 45.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                900.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 27.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 49.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            23.801904 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             15.50124 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits :)

Spent 0.861038 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits



fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461298.76894711
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.933 -09:59:55.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.933 -09:59:55.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0036 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:03.500 -09:59:15.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:03.500 -09:59:15.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0189 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:00:00.933 -09:59:55.53
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:03.500 -09:59:15.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01526 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O2r9I5yF3w
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2TMXRqhpdY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RhugepF61T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ouXIbNqMOO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.590100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.590100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.80
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.79

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.79

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.4)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.6 pix  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 2.3 pix  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.8 mag.  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 14.9 mag.  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.8 (SNR )  11.7 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.O2r9I5yF3w (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=897, passed=4374
Got 4374 stars (including 3271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3184 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3184 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 3182 stars left (next iteration limit 3500)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3182 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=1080 n_q2=583 n_q3=999 n_q4=520 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2TMXRqhpdY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=887, passed=4358
Got 4358 stars (including 3264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 3177 stars left (next iteration limit 3494)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3177 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=1022 n_q2=571 n_q3=1079 n_q4=505 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.RhugepF61T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=306, bad_region=816, passed=4015
Got 4015 stars (including 2960 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4015 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9744 through 0 to 8.0775, gap 8.0775 to 351.9744
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9745 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9745
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 2885 stars left (next iteration limit 3174)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2885 robust_rms=6.365 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.328 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2885 robust_rms=0.542 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.682 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2885 robust_rms=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.396 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2885 robust_rms_before=1.028 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.352 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.397 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.396
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.397 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits N_match=2885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=934 n_q2=523 n_q3=975 n_q4=453 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ouXIbNqMOO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=297, bad_region=817, passed=3997
Got 3997 stars (including 2940 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9971 through 0 to 8.0904, gap 8.0904 to 351.9971
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9972 through 0 to 8.0907, gap 8.0907 to 351.9972
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 2863 stars left (next iteration limit 3150)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2863 robust_rms=6.250 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.090 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2863 robust_rms=0.571 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.726 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2863 robust_rms=0.366 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.422 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2863 robust_rms_before=1.055 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.360 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.366 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.398 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.422
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.398 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits N_match=2863 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=915 n_q2=516 n_q3=973 n_q4=459 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.357 worst_q_ratio=1.090
ref2=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.120
new1=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.130
new2=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.133
reference average sigma_overall=0.3165 worst_q_ratio=1.105
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3182 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3177 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304_astrometric_residuals.png (2885 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305_astrometric_residuals.png (2863 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:47:03.95 -13:32:04.5:  15.22 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:59:03.31 -07:18:19.8:  15.31 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:59:03.31 -07:18:19.8:  15.41 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:47:03.95 -13:32:04.5:  15.26 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20194.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20195.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20194_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
Preparing report for the candidate 20194_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20195_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
Preparing report for the candidate 20195_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03145_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 03145_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    10.64    00:13:45.92 -07:48:34.8   6851 4495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

**** FOUND  00:13:45.93 -07:48:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:59:03.31 -07:18:19.8
23:47:03.95 -13:32:04.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.933 -09:59:55.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.933 -09:59:55.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0036 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:03.500 -09:59:15.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:03.500 -09:59:15.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0189 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:00:00.933 -09:59:55.53
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:03.500 -09:59:15.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01526 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fQxuxCm1Ua
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9jb32rvYI7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DTVMynUMmF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jue6SHgiUC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.414650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.414650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.94

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.94

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.5)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 21 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.4 pix  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 2.2 pix  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.9 mag.  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 15.0 mag.  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 15.0 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
 15.0 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.0 (SNR )  14.2 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fQxuxCm1Ua (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=913, bad_region=4921, passed=22724
Got 22724 stars (including 17090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22724 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0984, gap 8.0984 to 351.9463
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5319)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1598 n_q2=928 n_q3=1483 n_q4=827 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9jb32rvYI7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=4531, passed=23408
Got 23408 stars (including 18214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9465
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 4838 stars left (next iteration limit 5321)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4838 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=1569 n_q2=893 n_q3=1543 n_q4=833 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DTVMynUMmF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=803, bad_region=4267, passed=22687
Got 22687 stars (including 17765 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22687 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9467 through 0 to 8.0899, gap 8.0899 to 351.9467
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9468 through 0 to 8.0903, gap 8.0903 to 351.9468
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 4827 stars left (next iteration limit 5311)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4827 robust_rms=6.752 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.570 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4827 robust_rms=0.560 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.697 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4827 robust_rms=0.384 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.418 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4827 robust_rms_before=1.017 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.373 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.384 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.410 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.418
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.410 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits N_match=4827 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=1583 n_q2=884 n_q3=1527 n_q4=833 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jue6SHgiUC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=802, bad_region=4285, passed=22707
Got 22707 stars (including 17769 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22707 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9575 through 0 to 8.0909, gap 8.0909 to 351.9575
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9575 through 0 to 8.0913, gap 8.0913 to 351.9575
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 4835 stars left (next iteration limit 5318)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4835 robust_rms=6.742 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.409 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4835 robust_rms=0.569 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.708 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4835 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.441 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4835 robust_rms_before=1.042 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.382 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.429 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.441
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.429 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits N_match=4835 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.376 n_q1=1580 n_q2=887 n_q3=1533 n_q4=835 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:13:02.61 -05:59:50.3:  13.76 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:10.23 -12:23:26.7:  13.83 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:47.14 -09:24:31.5:  12.40 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:08:55.50 -06:06:20.9:  12.44 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:17:43.36 -11:13:11.9:  11.59 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:09.50 -08:03:52.8:  13.73 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:17:28.25 -10:23:32.6:  13.48 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:10:16.01 -10:51:11.4:  15.46 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:32:31.01 -06:02:18.0:  15.10 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:47.26 -09:01:11.1:  13.63 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:17:28.25 -10:23:32.6:  13.62 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:09.50 -08:03:52.8:  13.80 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:47.14 -09:24:31.5:  12.63 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:13:02.61 -05:59:50.3:  13.93 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:08:55.50 -06:06:20.9:  13.14 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:10:16.01 -10:51:11.4:  15.52 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.77 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:17:43.36 -11:13:11.9:  11.80 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:10.23 -12:23:26.7:  14.03 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:09.50 -08:03:52.8: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2603 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:28.25 -10:23:32.6: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0072 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.84 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:47.14 -09:24:31.5: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0804 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:02.61 -05:59:50.3: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1833 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:08:55.50 -06:06:20.9: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2257 delta=-0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.91 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:43.36 -11:13:11.9: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9771 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:10.23 -12:23:26.7: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9755 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:32:31.01 -06:02:18.0:  15.21 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:47.26 -09:01:11.1:  13.82 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.71 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:47.26 -09:01:11.1: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0697 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:34:27.07 -09:10:13.9:  14.41 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:37:57.92 -14:09:54.9:  14.27 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:10:12.58 -12:23:47.9:  13.61 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:54:09.79 -09:18:47.5:  14.38 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:34:13.40 -06:06:13.8:  14.50 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:03:22.04 -10:46:14.4:  13.78 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:41:31.99 -11:51:09.0:  14.62 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:40:14.98 -13:20:39.5:  15.30 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:34:27.07 -09:10:13.9:  14.66 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:37:57.92 -14:09:54.9:  14.35 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.51 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.31 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:27.07 -09:10:13.9: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3322 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:57.92 -14:09:54.9: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2366 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:10:12.58 -12:23:47.9:  13.75 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:54:09.79 -09:18:47.5:  14.31 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:34:13.40 -06:06:13.8:  14.68 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.67 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:10:12.58 -12:23:47.9: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0143 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.34 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.58 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:09.79 -09:18:47.5: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3817 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:41:31.99 -11:51:09.0:  14.67 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:13.40 -06:06:13.8: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3568 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:03:22.04 -10:46:14.4:  13.90 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.65 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:41:31.99 -11:51:09.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3958 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.83 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:03:22.04 -10:46:14.4: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1740 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:40:14.98 -13:20:39.5:  14.64 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.64 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:14.98 -13:20:39.5: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.4914 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32169.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32184.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32124_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 32124_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.26895    2461298.76895    14.29    23:56:09.53 -08:03:52.8   4217 4366   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    14.23    23:56:09.47 -08:03:52.8   4211 4359   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32127_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 32127_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.26895    2461298.76895    14.19    00:13:02.58 -05:59:52.0   6765 5604   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    14.17    00:13:02.63 -05:59:48.6   6759 5598   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32130_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 32130_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.26895    2461298.76895    13.97    00:17:28.21 -10:23:32.0   7388 2928   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    14.06    00:17:28.29 -10:23:33.1   7381 2921   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32134_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 32134_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.26895    2461298.76895    13.23    00:08:55.47 -06:06:21.5   6142 5543   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    13.22    00:08:55.52 -06:06:20.3   6136 5537   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32135_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 32135_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.26895    2461298.76895    13.04    23:56:47.13 -09:24:31.9   4309 3553   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    13.12    23:56:47.16 -09:24:31.1   4303 3546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32145_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 32145_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    11.48    23:59:03.30 -07:18:19.4   4646 4817   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

**** FOUND  23:59:03.31 -07:18:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32152_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 32152_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    11.79    23:47:03.92 -13:32:04.5   2864 1043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

**** FOUND  23:47:03.95 -13:32:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32153_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 32153_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.26895    2461298.76895    11.91    00:17:43.35 -11:13:11.9   7417 2426   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    12.06    00:17:43.37 -11:13:11.9   7410 2419   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32169_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
Preparing report for the candidate 32169_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32183_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 32183_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.26895    2461298.76895    13.93    23:33:10.25 -12:23:26.7   0792 1714   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    14.03    23:33:10.21 -12:23:26.7   0786 1707   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32184_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
Preparing report for the candidate 32184_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32186_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 32186_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.26895    2461298.76895    14.03    00:00:47.21 -09:01:11.4   4907 3786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    14.11    00:00:47.32 -09:01:10.9   4901 3779   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32190_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 32190_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.26895    2461298.76895    14.05    00:10:12.53 -12:23:47.1   6289 1732   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    13.98    00:10:12.63 -12:23:48.7   6283 1725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32194_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 32194_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.26895    2461298.76895    14.24    23:34:27.04 -09:10:14.2   0957 3680   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    14.53    23:34:27.10 -09:10:13.6   0950 3673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32195_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 32195_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.26895    2461298.76895    14.27    23:34:13.51 -06:06:14.6   0893 5552   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    14.49    23:34:13.29 -06:06:13.0   0886 5545   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32201_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 32201_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.26895    2461298.76895    14.18    00:03:22.03 -10:46:14.3   5284 2726   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    14.17    00:03:22.06 -10:46:14.4   5278 2719   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32208_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 32208_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.26895    2461298.76895    14.23    23:37:57.93 -14:09:54.9   1523 0644   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    14.25    23:37:57.90 -14:09:54.9   1517 0637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32210_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 32210_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.26895    2461298.76895    14.31    23:41:32.02 -11:51:08.4   2042 2063   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    14.61    23:41:31.97 -11:51:09.7   2035 2056   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32221_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 32221_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.26895    2461298.76895    14.35    23:54:09.78 -09:18:47.5   3918 3611   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    14.43    23:54:09.81 -09:18:47.4   3912 3605   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32233_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 32233_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.26895    2461298.76895    14.49    23:40:14.82 -13:20:40.2   1858 1152   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    14.51    23:40:15.14 -13:20:38.9   1852 1146   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21120_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 21120_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 15.26950    2461298.76950    10.63    00:13:45.93 -07:48:35.0   6851 4495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_014237_TTUQ2b1x1_2881801_5rKW5VGU/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-15_01-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

**** FOUND  00:13:45.93 -07:48:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:59:03.31 -07:18:19.8
23:47:03.95 -13:32:04.5
00:10:16.01 -10:51:11.4
23:32:31.01 -06:02:18.0
########### Completed Cet-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
23:59:03.31 -07:18:19.8
23:47:03.95 -13:32:04.5
00:10:16.01 -10:51:11.4
23:32:31.01 -06:02:18.0
###################################################################################
23:59:03.31 -07:18:19.8  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
23:47:03.95 -13:32:04.5  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
00:10:16.01 -10:51:11.4  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
23:32:31.01 -06:02:18.0  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461298.76894711 -observatory V36
12:26:44.41 -02:39:40.7 Mercury (-0.5mag)
13:54:09.80 -17:18:11.4 Venus (-4.8mag)
07:35:13.27 +22:23:51.6 Mars (1.2mag)
09:15:29.51 +16:29:58.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:49:46.90 +02:25:01.2 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:13:40.41 +21:01:57.8 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:12:58.40 -00:08:25.1 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:25:05.33 -23:41:14.6 Pluto (14.5mag)
14:29:30.28 -20:30:32.6 Moon (-9.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Sep 15 01:53 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461298.76894711:
09:15:28.45 +16:30:04.7 Io (6.0mag)
09:15:21.73 +16:30:38.1 Europa (6.2mag)
09:15:28.30 +16:30:03.5 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:15:58.25 +16:27:33.9 Callisto (6.8mag)
09:13:34.87 +16:49:33.9 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:15:31.75 +16:29:47.6 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:13:05.54 +16:43:33.9 Elara (17.7mag)
09:19:09.89 +15:55:23.9 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
09:15:59.78 +16:49:57.1 Carme (18.9mag)
00:49:49.54 +02:24:24.5 Titan (8.3mag)
00:49:43.34 +02:25:06.4 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:49:39.21 +02:26:26.5 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:49:42.18 +02:25:24.3 Hyperion (14.3mag)
00:48:25.71 +02:14:03.9 Phoebe (16.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 15 01:53 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461298.76894711:
23:11:14.01 +08:57:25.2 JWST
17:42:13.91 +33:21:32.5 Chandra
10:46:10.72 -58:34:53.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 15 01:53 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461298.76894711 -observatory V36
03:44:26.41 +19:40:17.8 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:06:17.45 -34:03:33.8 14.4mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:25:15.39 -70:45:23.5 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:25.07 +33:54:40.1 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
22:07:19.65 +27:39:20.6 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:15:57.97 +25:50:01.1 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:56:48.48 +26:57:16.9 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:53:39.64 +05:11:16.8 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:27:53.13 -16:20:46.6 15.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:45:04.90 +33:24:46.4 15.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:07:50.13 +15:14:06.5 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:29:22.63 +42:49:53.5 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:15:45.17 +48:47:15.8 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:39:29.84 -13:08:53.8 15.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:13:58.63 +16:55:00.6 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:31:01.87 +18:08:17.8 16.7mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:26:22.34 -00:32:03.3 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:04:22.05 +72:36:36.3 15.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:01:03.80 +45:48:21.7 17.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:20:42.97 +11:56:06.1 17.6mag A/2026 E1
22:32:43.78 -35:13:04.1 13.6mag 10P/Tempel
01:31:55.45 +38:28:04.8 17.6mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
11:53:32.31 -06:04:32.9 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:24:37.18 -07:35:42.5 17.7mag 63P/Wild
06:54:19.02 +18:36:06.7 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:16:41.02 +15:02:18.9 17.2mag 88P/Howell
06:05:12.51 +31:37:35.6 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
07:54:57.77 +22:39:28.1 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
10:45:32.59 +19:09:01.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:04:23.58 -24:04:16.4 17.5mag 124P/Mrkos
06:26:42.84 +20:22:25.3 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
01:52:36.19 -16:09:23.6 14.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:31:40.78 +09:32:55.8 12.4mag 169P/NEAT
03:29:54.89 +07:44:32.8 14.6mag 220P/McNaught
05:08:58.37 +38:42:41.0 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
08:52:48.55 +34:48:09.5 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:30:40.27 -01:08:16.1 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski
09:34:34.78 +16:26:44.5 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 15 01:53 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80  ASASSN-26fd  2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70  ASASSN-26fc  2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70  SN 2026zfw  2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10  SN2026aacj  2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10  SN2026zji  2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00  SN2026aaiv  2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60  ASASSN-26fb  2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50  AT2026aabo  2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60  SN 2026zhl  2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70  ASASSN-26fa  2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30  AT2026zwp  2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60  V8055  2026-08-30.22 10.89
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 15 01:53 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4  PNV J00421276+4116284  2026-09-10.9176  18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7  TCP J17520680-2343207  2026-09-08.7896  12.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 15 01:53 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
03:31:11.092 -14:38:09.71  AT 2026zoh  2026-08-19.79 20.03
21:18:35.112 -33:20:37.95  AT 2026zog  2026-08-20.54 19.38
02:00:38.724 -25:30:59.99  AT 2026zof  2026-08-22.74 20.44
03:40:37.734 -13:59:47.56  AT 2026zoe  2026-08-22.77 20.28
17:12:00.510 +15:14:17.16  AT 2026zod  2026-08-20.90 19.56
04:37:28.142 -54:56:45.16  AT 2026zoc  2026-08-23.08 18.717
06:44:08.250 -56:40:58.08  AT 2026zob  2026-08-23.13 18.404
02:16:27.519 -59:56:34.64  SN 2026zoa  2026-08-23.02 16.98
00:44:55.141 -61:04:41.30  AT 2026znz  2026-08-22.98 18.786
16:44:30.848 +29:10:48.11  AT 2026zny  2026-08-21.88 18.992
19:34:31.665 -67:53:50.86  AT 2026znx  2026-08-16.88 19.089
21:40:58.884 -12:14:28.04  SN 2026znw  2026-08-22.30 19.7661
14:36:38.726 +06:11:30.81  AT 2026znv  2026-08-15.16 20.4096
16:46:20.418 +09:07:40.25  AT 2026znu  2026-08-18.21 20.6423
14:48:34.457 +47:05:03.76  AT 2026znt  2026-08-18.16 19.9941
15:14:38.314 +53:22:00.35  AT 2026zns  2026-08-22.18 19.8897
14:05:20.302 +38:19:03.24  AT 2026znr  2026-08-17.16 20.531
13:50:33.306 +56:21:40.12  AT 2026znq  2026-08-04.19 20.1833
15:56:19.573 +73:27:02.03  AT 2026znp  2026-08-17.17 19.9239
14:27:30.459 +52:28:49.49  AT 2026zno  2026-08-18.16 19.6953
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 15 01:53 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Tue Sep 15 01:53:02 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 35s (0.58 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 10s (0.17 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 1s (0.02 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 11s (0.18 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 67s (1.12 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 9 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 14s (0.23 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 12s (0.20 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 1s (0.02 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 10s (0.17 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 39s (0.65 min)
FIELD_Cet-05-Q2b1x1: 124s (2.07 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 126s (2.10 min)
Finished: Tue Sep 15 01:55:08 CDT 2026