This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.2735 2461298.7735 10.67 23:18:25.33 -00:38:03.0
78.94983 -55.35457 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.236 Honoria 0 -0 0 10.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:18:25.33 -00:38:03.0: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:18:25.33 -00:38:03.0: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7735,10.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2735 10.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.2735 2461298.7735 13.10 23:37:54.87 -01:35:05.6
85.23895 -58.96702 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 10.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.328 Gudrun -0 -0 0 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:37:54.87 -01:35:05.6: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:37:54.87 -01:35:05.6: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7735,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2735 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.2735 2461298.7735 13.08 23:29:19.01 -01:12:11.7
82.27363 -57.44271 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.788 Hohensteina 0 -0 0 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:19.01 -01:12:11.7: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:19.01 -01:12:11.7: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7735,13.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2735 13.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.2735 2461298.7735 13.12 23:34:04.99 -00:32:51.3
84.79346 -57.57481 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 10.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.570 Kythera 0 1 1 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:04.99 -00:32:51.3: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:04.99 -00:32:51.3: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7735,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2735 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.2735 2461298.7735 13.44 23:37:45.00 -03:45:32.9
82.74630 -60.74568 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 10.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.799 Gudula -0 -0 0 13.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:37:45.00 -03:45:32.9: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:37:45.00 -03:45:32.9: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7735,13.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2735 13.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.2735 2461298.7735 13.78 23:30:04.62 +00:40:26.9
84.49808 -56.00335 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.673 Edda -1 0 1 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:30:04.62 +00:40:26.9: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:30:04.62 +00:40:26.9: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7735,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2735 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.2735 2461298.7735 13.82 23:32:30.80 -06:02:18.6
77.71544 -61.76978 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.981 Martina 1 0 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:30.80 -06:02:18.6: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:30.80 -06:02:18.6: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7735,13.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2735 13.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.2735 2461298.7735 13.98 23:37:25.65 +00:16:46.2
86.92964 -57.32533 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 10.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.440 Theodora -0 -0 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:37:25.65 +00:16:46.2: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:37:25.65 +00:16:46.2: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7735,13.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2735 13.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.2735 2461298.7735 14.15 23:22:59.70 +00:19:35.9
81.57078 -55.27784 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1157 Arabia 0 -0 0 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:22:59.70 +00:19:35.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:22:59.70 +00:19:35.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7735,14.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2735 14.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 15.2735 2461298.7735 14.32 22:54:05.38 -01:25:25.8
70.39028 -51.90047 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1746 Brouwer 1 1 1 14.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:54:05.38 -01:25:25.8: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:54:05.38 -01:25:25.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7735,14.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2735 14.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461298.77399969 15.09.2026 06:34:23.573 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6593
Objects passed selection criteria: 6587
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6216
Average stars matched: 6016.25 (96.7865 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232692 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 15 01:40:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461298.77399969 15.09.2026 06:34:23.573 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 127
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 38 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 37126
Objects passed selection criteria: 37008
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 35347.5
Average stars matched: 33664 (95.2373 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 260484 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 15 01:43:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461298.77308840
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:41.122 -01:58:48.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:41.122 -01:58:48.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0389 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:44.426 -01:58:17.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:44.426 -01:58:17.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0547 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:41.122 -01:58:48.07
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:44.426 -01:58:17.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01618 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NpnEbPUiT7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ddMXTrxTSj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hRBOeYZkTS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b29bAksVFd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.655300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.655300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to +3.2517 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to 3.2517 deg
Loaded 4385 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3695 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
2.2 pix Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
2.3 pix fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
2.3 pix fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
15.2 mag. Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.NpnEbPUiT7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, bad_region=0, passed=6415
Got 6415 stars (including 6023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4755 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4755 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4745 stars left (next iteration limit 5219)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits N_match=4745 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=1208 n_q2=1128 n_q3=1149 n_q4=1260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ddMXTrxTSj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, bad_region=0, passed=6260
Got 6260 stars (including 5889 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4749 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4739 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4749 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4739 stars left (next iteration limit 5212)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits N_match=4739 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=1216 n_q2=1124 n_q3=1135 n_q4=1264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.122
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hRBOeYZkTS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=359, bad_region=0, passed=6163
Got 6163 stars (including 5795 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6163 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4744 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4737 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4745 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4738 stars left (next iteration limit 5210)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4738 robust_rms=10.559 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.709 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4738 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.413 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4738 robust_rms=0.285 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.312 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4738 robust_rms_before=0.970 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.299 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.285 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.339 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.312
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.339 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits N_match=4738 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=1238 n_q2=1123 n_q3=1191 n_q4=1186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.b29bAksVFd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=368, bad_region=0, passed=6244
Got 6244 stars (including 5861 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6244 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4746 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6244 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4747 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6244 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6244 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4738 stars left (next iteration limit 5211)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4738 robust_rms=10.730 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.613 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4738 robust_rms=0.366 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.377 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4738 robust_rms=0.257 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.284 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4738 robust_rms_before=0.968 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.274 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.257 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.313 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.284
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.313 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=4738 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1229 n_q2=1119 n_q3=1189 n_q4=1201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits sigma_overall=0.332 worst_q_ratio=1.133
ref2=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.122
new1=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits sigma_overall=0.303 worst_q_ratio=1.167
new2=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits sigma_overall=0.280 worst_q_ratio=1.197
reference average sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.1275
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017_astrometric_residuals.png (4745 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018_astrometric_residuals.png (4739 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254_astrometric_residuals.png (4738 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255_astrometric_residuals.png (4738 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-33-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_013509_TTUQ1b1x1_1445080_yWaq6VGf/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:01:08.73 -01:13:13.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:35.52 -06:36:08.7: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:07:13.50 -01:29:21.6: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:14:35.83 -02:04:12.8: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:18:25.33 -00:38:03.0: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:21:26.72 -03:04:03.0: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:09:54.80 -00:33:17.9: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:35.52 -06:36:08.7: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:18:25.33 -00:38:03.0: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:01:08.73 -01:13:13.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:35.52 -06:36:08.7: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2461 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:09:54.80 -00:33:17.9: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:21:26.72 -03:04:03.0: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:14:35.83 -02:04:12.8: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:09:54.80 -00:33:17.9: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1775 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:08.73 -01:13:13.0: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1633 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:07:13.50 -01:29:21.6: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:26.72 -03:04:03.0: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7734 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:14:35.83 -02:04:12.8: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1892 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:07:13.50 -01:29:21.6: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0723 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20363.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20304_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 20304_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:38:58.93 +01:01:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20363_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 20363_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20463_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 20463_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20492_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 20492_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20504_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 20504_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20506_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 20506_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20507_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 20507_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20513_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 20513_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53201_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 53201_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53204_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 53204_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53205_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 53205_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53207_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 53207_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53210_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 53210_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53214_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 53214_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53219_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 53219_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53220_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 53220_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53221_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 53221_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53228_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 53228_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53229_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 53229_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:38:58.97 +01:01:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53289_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 53289_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:18:25.33 -00:38:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53598_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 53598_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53599_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 53599_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53602_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 53602_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53612_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 53612_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53689_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 53689_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53701_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 53701_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:13:21.38 +02:39:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53706_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 53706_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53807_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 53807_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53856_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 53856_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53893_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 53893_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53912_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 53912_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53958_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 53958_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53995_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 53995_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54013_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54013_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54035_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54035_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54046_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54046_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54058_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54058_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54078_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 54078_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54091_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54091_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54112_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54112_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54117_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54117_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54164_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54164_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54194_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54194_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54202_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54202_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54204_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54204_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54207_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54207_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54219_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54219_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54225_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54225_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54246_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54246_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54247_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54247_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54260_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54260_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54261_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54261_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54265_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54265_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54266_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54266_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54270_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54270_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54273_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54273_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54279_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54279_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54289_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54289_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54296_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54296_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54301_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54301_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54312_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54312_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54316_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54316_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54328_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54328_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54330_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54330_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54331_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54331_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54333_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54333_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54334_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54334_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54343_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54343_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54344_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54344_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54348_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54348_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54349_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54349_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54354_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54354_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54355_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54355_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54358_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54358_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54365_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54365_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54368_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54368_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54375_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54375_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54380_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54380_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54383_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54383_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54387_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54387_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54390_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54390_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54411_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54411_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54416_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54416_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54417_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54417_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54423_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54423_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54426_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54426_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54428_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54428_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54440_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54440_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54441_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54441_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54446_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54446_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54451_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54451_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54456_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54456_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54458_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54458_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54459_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54459_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54469_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54469_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54475_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54475_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54478_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54478_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54479_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54479_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54480_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54480_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54499_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54499_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54510_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54510_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54525_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54525_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54528_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54528_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54533_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54533_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54546_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54546_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54555_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54555_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54564_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54564_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54571_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54571_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54577_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54577_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54592_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54592_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54594_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54594_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54608_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54608_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54609_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54609_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54627_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 54627_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-34-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
