Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 15.2719  2461298.7719  11.31  23:59:03.19 -07:18:20.6
 88.45934 -66.60478 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
106 Dione                   -0      0       0  11.5     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:59:03.19 -07:18:20.6:  15.34 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:59:03.19 -07:18:20.6:  15.42 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -crosshair 4539.56494 4826.69922 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -crosshair 4533.06787 4820.78809 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.27186 23 59 03.19 -07 18 20.6          11.3 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.27153 23 59 03.21 -07 18 20.5          11.3 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.27220 23 59 03.18 -07 18 20.7          11.3 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 09 15.2719*  23 59 03.19 -07 18 20.6  11.3 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7719,11.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2719 11.31CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 15.2719  2461298.7719  11.93  23:47:03.77 -13:32:05.3
 71.85618 -69.73113 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
118 Peitho                  -1     -0       1  11.9     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:47:03.77 -13:32:05.3:  15.24 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:47:03.77 -13:32:05.3:  15.27 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -crosshair 3003.64014 962.82068 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -crosshair 2997.31201 956.83722 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.27186 23 47 03.77 -13 32 05.3          11.9 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.27153 23 47 03.78 -13 32 05.3          11.9 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.27220 23 47 03.77 -13 32 05.2          11.9 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 09 15.2719*  23 47 03.77 -13 32 05.3  11.9 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7719,11.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2719 11.93CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 15.2719  2461298.7719  13.52  00:10:15.85 -10:51:11.6
 90.20158 -71.06015 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1133 Lugduna                 -1      0       1  13.5    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:10:15.85 -10:51:11.6:  15.47 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:10:15.85 -10:51:11.6:  15.53 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -crosshair 6321.33838 2784.27783 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -crosshair 6315.09521 2778.48877 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.27186 00 10 15.85 -10 51 11.6          13.5 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.27153 00 10 15.83 -10 51 11.5          13.6 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 09 15.27220 00 10 15.86 -10 51 11.6          13.5 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 09 15.2719*  00 10 15.85 -10 51 11.6  13.5 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461298.7719,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260915.2719 13.52CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last  image: 2461298.77219753 15.09.2026 06:31:47.867   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.75
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  4805
Objects passed selection criteria:  4803
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.7    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.7    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 4531
Average stars matched: 4322.25 (95.3928 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   231220 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Sep 15 01:59:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last  image: 2461298.77219753 15.09.2026 06:31:47.867   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 34
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.44
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  23057
Objects passed selection criteria:  22988
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 21474
Average stars matched: 20412.2 (95.0556 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   246200 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Sep 15 02:00:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 859405 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 859405 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits_preview.png'

Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits


renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits_preview.png'

Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 765.4159
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.5498
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1681.7401
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 565.3820
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1679.4722
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 564.6699
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.19716
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 27.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-15T01:30:49.8533067' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-15T06:30:49.8533067' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61298.2714103358 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-15T06:30:59.7570117' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61298.2715249653 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.995877739833 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -9.99946122402083 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     45.3238888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     165.528611111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.40493419438614 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 45.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                899.7 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 27.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 35.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            27.702216 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             20.50164 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits :)

Spent 0.547527 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 27.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-15T01:31:47.8676494' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-15T06:31:47.8676494' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61298.2720817938 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-15T06:31:57.7685709' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61298.2721963888 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.995877716746 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -9.99946122331106 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     45.3738888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     165.860555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =      1.4037278390693 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 45.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                899.7 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 27.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 35.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            27.702216 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             20.50164 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits :)

Spent 0.521697 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits



fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461298.77152608
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:05.016 -10:02:01.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:05.016 -10:02:01.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0371 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:07.717 -10:01:28.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:07.717 -10:01:28.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0377 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:00:05.016 -10:02:01.73
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:07.717 -10:01:28.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01434 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E6H5IAlfVe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ozdDNhtK9x
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YBQvSeafaH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Hsi7XrZIIV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.569700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.569700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.75
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.82

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.82

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.1)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.6 pix  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 2.3 pix  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 3.5 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
 3.4 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.8 mag.  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 14.9 mag.  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.7 (SNR )  11.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.E6H5IAlfVe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=0, passed=4374
Got 4374 stars (including 4092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0777, gap 8.0777 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 3991 stars left (next iteration limit 4390)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3991 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1080 n_q2=969 n_q3=999 n_q4=943 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ozdDNhtK9x (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=0, passed=4358
Got 4358 stars (including 4088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0776, gap 8.0776 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 3988 stars left (next iteration limit 4386)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3988 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1022 n_q2=971 n_q3=1079 n_q4=916 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YBQvSeafaH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=229, bad_region=0, passed=4746
Got 4746 stars (including 4516 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4746 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6383 through 0 to 8.1602, gap 8.1602 to 351.6383
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4401 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4400 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4400 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6377 through 0 to 8.1605, gap 8.1605 to 351.6377
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4401 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4399 stars left (next iteration limit 4840)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4399 robust_rms=11.421 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.109 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4399 robust_rms=0.395 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.413 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4399 robust_rms=0.314 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.373 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4399 robust_rms_before=0.965 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.314 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.370 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.373
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.370 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits N_match=4399 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.252 n_q1=1121 n_q2=986 n_q3=1261 n_q4=1031 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Hsi7XrZIIV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=231, bad_region=0, passed=4763
Got 4763 stars (including 4527 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4763 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6387 through 0 to 8.1601, gap 8.1601 to 351.6387
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4407 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4406 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4406 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6380 through 0 to 8.1603, gap 8.1603 to 351.6380
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4407 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4405 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4405 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 4405 stars left (next iteration limit 4846)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4405 robust_rms=11.346 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.863 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4405 robust_rms=0.387 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.417 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4405 robust_rms=0.306 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.368 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4405 robust_rms_before=0.952 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.296 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.306 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.376 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.368
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.376 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits N_match=4405 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.234 n_q1=1115 n_q2=992 n_q3=1265 n_q4=1033 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.109
ref2=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.078
new1=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.223
new2=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits sigma_overall=0.286 worst_q_ratio=1.279
reference average sigma_overall=0.3205 worst_q_ratio=1.0935
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3991 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3988 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252_astrometric_residuals.png (4399 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253_astrometric_residuals.png (4405 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:59:03.19 -07:18:20.6:  15.34 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:32:49.48 -08:01:55.9:  11.90 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:14:37.61 -07:49:21.1:  11.90 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:47:03.77 -13:32:05.3:  15.24 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:32:49.48 -08:01:55.9:  11.89 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:59:03.19 -07:18:20.6:  15.42 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:47:03.77 -13:32:05.3:  15.27 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:14:37.61 -07:49:21.1:  11.89 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:49.48 -08:01:55.9: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7785 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:37.61 -07:49:21.1: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8729 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20294.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20339.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20256_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 20256_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    10.26    00:19:24.42 -08:51:11.9   7620 4049   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  00:19:24.41 -08:51:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20294_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 20294_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20326_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 20326_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    11.77    23:32:49.48 -08:01:55.8   0636 4128   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    11.78    23:32:49.49 -08:01:55.9   0629 4122   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20337_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 20337_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    11.87    00:14:37.62 -07:49:21.0   6882 4643   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    11.87    00:14:37.60 -07:49:21.2   6876 4637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20339_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 20339_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00255_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 00255_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    9.72    00:02:07.32 -14:40:30.5   5244 0409   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  00:02:07.34 -14:40:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03145_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 03145_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    10.62    00:13:45.95 -07:48:34.6   6746 4638   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  00:13:45.94 -07:48:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:59:03.19 -07:18:20.6
23:47:03.77 -13:32:05.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:05.016 -10:02:01.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:05.016 -10:02:01.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0371 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:07.717 -10:01:28.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:07.717 -10:01:28.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0377 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:00:05.016 -10:02:01.73
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:07.717 -10:01:28.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01434 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sM6dsaVcHc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5vu62wbyGh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PSrzn7PR8x
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oKNubIAQh7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.388800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.388800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.44
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.95

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.95

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.3)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 32 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.4 pix  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 2.2 pix  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 3.2 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
 3.2 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.9 mag.  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 15.0 mag.  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.8 (SNR )  14.0 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.sM6dsaVcHc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=913, bad_region=0, passed=22729
Got 22729 stars (including 21779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22729 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0982, gap 8.0982 to 351.9463
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5350)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1176 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5vu62wbyGh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=0, passed=23408
Got 23408 stars (including 22542 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0899, gap 8.0899 to 351.9465
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1259 n_q2=1185 n_q3=1245 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.PSrzn7PR8x (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=684, bad_region=5, passed=20270
Got 20270 stars (including 19554 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20270 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6383 through 0 to 8.1641, gap 8.1641 to 351.6383
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20270 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6377 through 0 to 8.1644, gap 8.1644 to 351.6377
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20270 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20270 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4863 stars left (next iteration limit 5348)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4863 robust_rms=10.517 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.849 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4863 robust_rms=0.403 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.429 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4863 robust_rms=0.321 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.383 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4863 robust_rms_before=0.973 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.307 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.321 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.386 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.383
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.386 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits N_match=4863 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=1219 n_q2=1087 n_q3=1392 n_q4=1165 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.oKNubIAQh7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=694, bad_region=6, passed=20216
Got 20216 stars (including 19487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20216 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6388 through 0 to 8.1744, gap 8.1744 to 351.6388
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20216 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6379 through 0 to 8.1747, gap 8.1747 to 351.6379
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20216 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20216 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5350)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=10.674 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.892 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.398 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.432 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.318 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.384 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4864 robust_rms_before=0.957 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.304 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.318 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.391 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.384
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.391 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1207 n_q2=1087 n_q3=1390 n_q4=1180 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.291
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:13:02.66 -05:59:51.3:  13.81 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:59:45.78 -05:52:34.7:  12.57 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:48.89 -06:31:08.0:  13.29 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:51:01.70 -05:38:19.9:  12.78 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:06.67 -07:36:47.8:  12.85 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:29:34.46 -05:21:34.1:  13.71 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:41:57.12 -07:37:14.4:  12.84 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:10:15.85 -10:51:11.6:  15.47 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:18.91 -09:31:08.1:  13.77 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:42:24.54 -06:00:17.9:  13.69 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:13:02.66 -05:59:51.3:  13.95 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:48.89 -06:31:08.0:  13.25 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:59:45.78 -05:52:34.7:  12.52 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:29:34.46 -05:21:34.1:  13.59 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:06.67 -07:36:47.8:  13.03 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:51:01.70 -05:38:19.9:  12.98 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.88 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:02.66 -05:59:51.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0346 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:48.89 -06:31:08.0: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3456 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:45.78 -05:52:34.7: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5767 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:06.67 -07:36:47.8: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2419 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.64 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:34.46 -05:21:34.1: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9614 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:01.70 -05:38:19.9: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3823 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:41:57.12 -07:37:14.4:  12.96 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:41:57.12 -07:37:14.4: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4211 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:10:15.85 -10:51:11.6:  15.53 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:42:24.54 -06:00:17.9:  13.94 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.79 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:42:24.54 -06:00:17.9: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0932 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:18.91 -09:31:08.1:  13.72 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.74 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:18.91 -09:31:08.1: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7936 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:04.64 -05:20:01.7:  14.18 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:30.30 -08:23:19.7:  14.77 +/- 0.27  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:36:44.16 -05:21:44.4:  14.30 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:36.10 -10:20:04.7:  13.93 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:39:49.51 -04:46:36.6:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:34:23.41 -04:58:22.7:  14.37 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:42:43.68 -05:48:38.6:  14.41 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:38:25.93 -07:30:55.6:  14.56 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:39:31.76 -05:40:44.4:  14.56 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:36:44.16 -05:21:44.4:  14.49 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:30.30 -08:23:19.7:  14.46 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:04.64 -05:20:01.7:  14.51 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:36.10 -10:20:04.7:  13.97 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:39:49.51 -04:46:36.6:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:49.51 -04:46:36.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:34:23.41 -04:58:22.7:  14.45 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.57 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.38 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.30 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.95 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:30.30 -08:23:19.7: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.2287 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:44.16 -05:21:44.4: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2898 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:36.10 -10:20:04.7: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9588 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:04.64 -05:20:01.7: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2580 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.41 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:23.41 -04:58:22.7: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1928 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:38:25.93 -07:30:55.6:  14.75 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:42:43.68 -05:48:38.6:  14.68 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:39:31.76 -05:40:44.4:  14.34 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.64 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:25.93 -07:30:55.6: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2936 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.51 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.43 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:42:43.68 -05:48:38.6: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3442 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:31.76 -05:40:44.4: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4385 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:30:29.95 -06:59:44.0:  14.71 +/- 0.24  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:37:31.92 -10:47:02.3:  14.60 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:59.38 -08:18:31.4:  14.53 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:47.30 -09:01:12.0:  13.68 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:50:40.62 -08:45:44.2:  14.80 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:34:30.15 -08:02:50.9:  14.73 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:30:29.95 -06:59:44.0:  14.32 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.45 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:29.95 -06:59:44.0: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4378 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:34:30.15 -08:02:50.9:  14.51 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:37:31.92 -10:47:02.3:  14.59 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.60 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:59.38 -08:18:31.4:  14.39 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:30.15 -08:02:50.9: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3801 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.60 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:50:40.62 -08:45:44.2:  14.74 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:47.30 -09:01:12.0:  13.82 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:31.92 -10:47:02.3: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2820 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.45 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:59.38 -08:18:31.4: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4128 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.77 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.75 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:50:40.62 -08:45:44.2: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3712 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:47.30 -09:01:12.0: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0289 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32805.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32355_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32355_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    14.17    00:13:02.73 -05:59:52.5   6593 5734   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    13.97    00:13:02.60 -05:59:50.1   6586 5729   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32358_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32358_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    13.89    00:29:34.42 -05:21:34.0   9090 6253   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    14.05    00:29:34.49 -05:21:34.2   9083 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32389_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32389_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    10.25    00:19:24.43 -08:51:11.9   7620 4049   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  00:19:24.42 -08:51:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32425_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32425_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    11.44    23:59:03.17 -07:18:20.7   4533 4821   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  23:59:03.19 -07:18:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32475_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32475_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    11.86    23:47:03.77 -13:32:05.2   2997 0957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  23:47:03.78 -13:32:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32531_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32531_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    12.59    23:59:45.78 -05:52:34.8   4595 5696   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    12.56    23:59:45.78 -05:52:34.7   4588 5690   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32532_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32532_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    12.58    00:05:10.83 -05:41:48.1   5395 5846   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  00:05:10.83 -05:41:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32641_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32641_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    13.24    23:48:06.67 -07:36:47.2   2918 4541   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    13.24    23:48:06.67 -07:36:48.3   2911 4534   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32645_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32645_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    13.29    23:52:48.90 -06:31:08.2   3578 5245   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    13.41    23:52:48.88 -06:31:07.9   3571 5239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32646_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32646_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    13.38    23:51:01.74 -05:38:19.4   3275 5762   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    13.38    23:51:01.66 -05:38:20.3   3268 5755   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32668_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32668_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    13.39    23:41:57.10 -07:37:14.8   1994 4475   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    13.45    23:41:57.14 -07:37:13.9   1988 4469   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32801_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32801_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    13.99    23:42:24.49 -06:00:18.3   1992 5457   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    14.26    23:42:24.59 -06:00:17.4   1985 5452   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32805_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 32805_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32823_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32823_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    13.79    23:56:18.82 -09:31:09.3   4212 3471   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    13.79    23:56:19.00 -09:31:06.8   4206 3465   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32850_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32850_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    14.24    23:39:49.50 -04:46:36.4   1544 6180   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    14.51    23:39:49.53 -04:46:36.7   1538 6174   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32851_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32851_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    14.23    23:34:23.39 -04:58:23.3   0724 6007   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    14.17    23:34:23.44 -04:58:22.1   0718 6001   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32853_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32853_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    13.97    23:31:36.13 -10:20:04.6   0563 2719   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    13.95    23:31:36.08 -10:20:04.9   0556 2713   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32858_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32858_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    14.25    23:31:04.65 -05:20:02.4   0235 5752   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    14.26    23:31:04.64 -05:20:01.0   0228 5746   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32871_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32871_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    14.30    23:36:44.15 -05:21:44.7   1102 5792   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    14.28    23:36:44.17 -05:21:44.1   1095 5786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32876_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32876_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    14.19    23:33:30.29 -08:23:19.9   0756 3920   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    14.29    23:33:30.31 -08:23:19.5   0750 3914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32883_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32883_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    14.21    23:38:25.87 -07:30:56.0   1460 4502   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    14.41    23:38:25.99 -07:30:55.1   1453 4496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32887_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32887_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    14.33    23:42:43.66 -05:48:38.6   2031 5579   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    14.36    23:42:43.70 -05:48:38.7   2025 5573   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32888_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32888_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    14.33    23:39:31.67 -05:40:44.6   1541 5627   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    14.67    23:39:31.86 -05:40:44.2   1535 5621   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32897_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32897_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    14.44    23:30:29.99 -06:59:43.5   0231 4732   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    14.44    23:30:29.90 -06:59:44.5   0224 4726   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32923_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32923_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    14.08    00:00:47.33 -09:01:11.3   4858 3810   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    13.99    00:00:47.26 -09:01:12.8   4851 3804   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32932_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32932_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    14.33    23:34:30.20 -08:02:51.6   0891 4138   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    14.45    23:34:30.11 -08:02:50.3   0884 4132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32943_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32943_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    14.19    23:37:31.96 -10:47:04.7   1474 2517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    14.45    23:37:31.87 -10:46:59.8   1467 2512   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32961_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32961_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    14.36    23:43:59.38 -08:18:32.2   2330 4080   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    14.52    23:43:59.39 -08:18:30.7   2324 4075   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32995_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 32995_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 15.27153    2461298.77153    14.29    23:50:40.63 -08:45:46.3   3347 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-30-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    14.48    23:50:40.62 -08:45:42.1   3340 3868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33273_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 33273_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    14.51    23:50:11.31 -13:49:44.7   3468 0812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  23:50:11.35 -13:49:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01200_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 01200_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    9.52    00:02:07.33 -14:40:30.5   5244 0409   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  00:02:07.34 -14:40:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21120_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 21120_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 15.27220    2461298.77220    10.62    00:13:45.95 -07:48:34.6   6746 4638   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-15_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_013224_TTUQ1b1x1_758159_AbLtRvfu/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-15_01-31-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  00:13:45.94 -07:48:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:59:03.19 -07:18:20.6
23:47:03.77 -13:32:05.3
00:10:15.85 -10:51:11.6
########### Completed Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
23:59:03.19 -07:18:20.6
23:47:03.77 -13:32:05.3
00:10:15.85 -10:51:11.6
###################################################################################
23:59:03.19 -07:18:20.6  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
23:47:03.77 -13:32:05.3  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
00:10:15.85 -10:51:11.6  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461298.77152608 -observatory V36
12:26:45.30 -02:39:47.6 Mercury (-0.5mag)
13:54:10.12 -17:18:14.3 Venus (-4.8mag)
07:35:13.67 +22:23:50.8 Mars (1.2mag)
09:15:29.63 +16:29:57.4 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:49:46.86 +02:25:01.0 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:13:40.41 +21:01:57.8 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:12:58.38 -00:08:25.2 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:25:05.32 -23:41:14.7 Pluto (14.5mag)
14:29:39.95 -20:30:59.5 Moon (-9.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Sep 15 01:59 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461298.77152608:
09:15:28.63 +16:30:03.9 Io (6.0mag)
09:15:21.88 +16:30:37.5 Europa (6.2mag)
09:15:28.39 +16:30:03.1 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:15:58.37 +16:27:33.4 Callisto (6.8mag)
09:13:35.00 +16:49:33.5 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:15:31.95 +16:29:46.7 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:13:05.67 +16:43:33.4 Elara (17.7mag)
09:19:10.00 +15:55:23.3 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
09:15:59.89 +16:49:56.6 Carme (18.9mag)
00:49:49.51 +02:24:24.2 Titan (8.3mag)
00:49:43.29 +02:25:06.1 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:49:39.17 +02:26:26.2 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:49:42.12 +02:25:24.0 Hyperion (14.3mag)
00:48:25.67 +02:14:03.6 Phoebe (16.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 15 01:59 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461298.77152608:
23:11:14.36 +08:57:33.9 JWST
17:42:27.13 +33:16:46.7 Chandra
10:47:50.87 -58:40:04.6 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 15 01:59 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461298.77152608 -observatory V36
03:44:26.47 +19:40:18.1 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:06:17.52 -34:03:33.6 14.4mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:25:15.50 -70:45:24.0 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:25.08 +33:54:40.4 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
22:07:19.54 +27:39:19.4 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:15:58.08 +25:50:00.9 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:56:48.62 +26:57:16.6 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:53:39.73 +05:11:16.8 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:27:53.10 -16:20:47.4 15.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:45:05.03 +33:24:47.0 15.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:07:50.16 +15:14:06.4 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:29:22.56 +42:49:53.0 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:15:44.97 +48:47:15.1 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:39:29.91 -13:08:53.9 15.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:13:58.67 +16:54:58.7 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:31:02.13 +18:08:17.0 16.7mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:26:22.48 -00:32:04.0 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:04:22.54 +72:36:34.5 15.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:01:03.69 +45:48:21.3 17.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:20:43.11 +11:56:06.8 17.6mag A/2026 E1
22:32:43.90 -35:13:03.9 13.6mag 10P/Tempel
01:31:55.67 +38:28:06.2 17.6mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
11:53:32.42 -06:04:33.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:24:37.50 -07:35:45.4 17.7mag 63P/Wild
06:54:19.30 +18:36:05.9 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:16:40.99 +15:02:18.9 17.2mag 88P/Howell
06:05:13.04 +31:37:39.1 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
07:54:58.21 +22:39:25.4 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
10:45:32.93 +19:08:59.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:04:23.94 -24:04:19.5 17.5mag 124P/Mrkos
06:26:43.01 +20:22:25.0 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
01:52:35.20 -16:09:21.0 14.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:31:40.82 +09:32:51.8 12.4mag 169P/NEAT
03:29:54.96 +07:44:31.9 14.6mag 220P/McNaught
05:08:58.77 +38:42:43.7 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
08:52:48.95 +34:48:08.4 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:30:40.38 -01:08:17.2 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski
09:34:34.91 +16:26:44.0 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 15 01:59 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80  ASASSN-26fd  2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70  ASASSN-26fc  2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70  SN 2026zfw  2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10  SN2026aacj  2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10  SN2026zji  2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00  SN2026aaiv  2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60  ASASSN-26fb  2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50  AT2026aabo  2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60  SN 2026zhl  2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70  ASASSN-26fa  2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30  AT2026zwp  2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60  V8055  2026-08-30.22 10.89
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 15 01:59 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4  PNV J00421276+4116284  2026-09-10.9176  18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7  TCP J17520680-2343207  2026-09-08.7896  12.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 15 01:59 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
03:31:11.092 -14:38:09.71  AT 2026zoh  2026-08-19.79 20.03
21:18:35.112 -33:20:37.95  AT 2026zog  2026-08-20.54 19.38
02:00:38.724 -25:30:59.99  AT 2026zof  2026-08-22.74 20.44
03:40:37.734 -13:59:47.56  AT 2026zoe  2026-08-22.77 20.28
17:12:00.510 +15:14:17.16  AT 2026zod  2026-08-20.90 19.56
04:37:28.142 -54:56:45.16  AT 2026zoc  2026-08-23.08 18.717
06:44:08.250 -56:40:58.08  AT 2026zob  2026-08-23.13 18.404
02:16:27.519 -59:56:34.64  SN 2026zoa  2026-08-23.02 16.98
00:44:55.141 -61:04:41.30  AT 2026znz  2026-08-22.98 18.786
16:44:30.848 +29:10:48.11  AT 2026zny  2026-08-21.88 18.992
19:34:31.665 -67:53:50.86  AT 2026znx  2026-08-16.88 19.089
21:40:58.884 -12:14:28.04  SN 2026znw  2026-08-22.30 19.7661
14:36:38.726 +06:11:30.81  AT 2026znv  2026-08-15.16 20.4096
16:46:20.418 +09:07:40.25  AT 2026znu  2026-08-18.21 20.6423
14:48:34.457 +47:05:03.76  AT 2026znt  2026-08-18.16 19.9941
15:14:38.314 +53:22:00.35  AT 2026zns  2026-08-22.18 19.8897
14:05:20.302 +38:19:03.24  AT 2026znr  2026-08-17.16 20.531
13:50:33.306 +56:21:40.12  AT 2026znq  2026-08-04.19 20.1833
15:56:19.573 +73:27:02.03  AT 2026znp  2026-08-17.17 19.9239
14:27:30.459 +52:28:49.49  AT 2026zno  2026-08-18.16 19.6953
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 15 01:59 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Tue Sep 15 01:59:07 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 24s (0.40 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 8s (0.13 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 9s (0.15 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 48s (0.80 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 7 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 12s (0.20 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 12s (0.20 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 8s (0.13 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 34s (0.57 min)
FIELD_Cet-05-Q1b1x1: 95s (1.58 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 97s (1.62 min)
Finished: Tue Sep 15 02:00:44 CDT 2026