This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3757 2461297.8757 12.30 03:05:49.43 +01:51:12.8
176.48779 -46.56740 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.129 Antigone -0 0 0 12.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:05:49.43 +01:51:12.8: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:05:49.43 +01:51:12.8: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 14.3757* 03 05 49.43 +01 51 12.8 12.3 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8757,12.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3757 12.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3757 2461297.8757 12.55 03:04:40.68 +03:27:52.1
174.55211 -45.63164 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.221 Eos -0 0 0 12.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:04:40.68 +03:27:52.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:04:40.68 +03:27:52.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 14.3757* 03 04 40.68 +03 27 52.1 12.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8757,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3757 12.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3757 2461297.8757 13.34 03:15:28.57 +03:04:01.9
177.61426 -43.98727 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.464 Megaira -0 -0 0 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:15:28.57 +03:04:01.9: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:15:28.57 +03:04:01.9: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 14.3757* 03 15 28.57 +03 04 01.9 13.3 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8757,13.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3757 13.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3757 2461297.8757 14.05 03:17:12.41 +10:53:06.0
170.76661 -38.09505 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.619 Triberga 0 -1 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:17:12.41 +10:53:06.0: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:17:12.41 +10:53:06.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 14.3757* 03 17 12.41 +10 53 06.0 14.1 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8757,14.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3757 14.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 14.3757* 03 29 23.69 +07 49 50.8 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8757,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3757 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.3757 2461297.8757 14.96 03:11:15.61 +06:43:16.1
173.05828 -42.14825 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1104 Syringa 1 -1 1 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:11:15.61 +06:43:16.1: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:11:15.61 +06:43:16.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 14.3757* 03 11 15.61 +06 43 16.1 15.0 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461297.8757,14.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260914.3757 14.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
First image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Last image: 2461297.87601802 14.09.2026 09:01:17.957 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6946
Objects passed selection criteria: 6942
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6615.75
Average stars matched: 6459 (97.6307 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233040 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 14 04:06:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
First image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Last image: 2461297.87601802 14.09.2026 09:01:17.957 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 99
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 39628
Objects passed selection criteria: 39530
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 37757.8
Average stars matched: 36578 (96.8755 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 260264 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 14 04:08:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461297.87545142
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:26:03.544 +05:58:29.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:26:03.544 +05:58:29.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0738 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:26:03.601 +05:59:00.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:26:03.601 +05:59:00.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0735 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:26:03.544 +05:58:29.18
Second-epoch second image center 03:26:03.601 +05:59:00.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00863 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XUZ73HETzK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RSx9doWXGu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WeFhzMhS8N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D4EVkfMIPM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2623 deg
Loaded 4344 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3518 out of 3704 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3704 out of 6894 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2623 deg
Loaded 4344 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3518 out of 3704 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3704 out of 6894 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 6511 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4391 to 59.4125 deg, Dec +0.6696 to +11.2487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4391 to 59.4125 deg, Dec 0.6696 to 11.2487 deg
Loaded 4348 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3541 out of 3691 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3691 out of 6511 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
2.1 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
15.3 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.XUZ73HETzK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=524, bad_region=0, passed=6894
Got 6894 stars (including 6363 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6894 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.232 n_q1=1258 n_q2=1017 n_q3=1321 n_q4=1279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.316
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.RSx9doWXGu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=474, bad_region=1, passed=6511
Got 6511 stars (including 6031 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6511 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.237 n_q1=1260 n_q2=1041 n_q3=1292 n_q4=1287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WeFhzMhS8N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=459, bad_region=0, passed=6598
Got 6598 stars (including 6130 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6598 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=11.820 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.384 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.394 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.401 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.287 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.291 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4878 robust_rms_before=1.003 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.294 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.287 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.302 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.291
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.302 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=1315 n_q2=1296 n_q3=1024 n_q4=1243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.034
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.D4EVkfMIPM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=449, bad_region=0, passed=6631
Got 6631 stars (including 6173 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6631 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=11.820 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.368 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.387 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.411 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.261 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.274 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=1.005 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.268 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.261 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.279 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.274
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.279 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.279 n_q1=1314 n_q2=1284 n_q3=1024 n_q4=1259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.024
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits sigma_overall=0.283 worst_q_ratio=1.316
ref2=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits sigma_overall=0.290 worst_q_ratio=1.274
new1=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.034
new2=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.024
reference average sigma_overall=0.2865 worst_q_ratio=1.295
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412_astrometric_residuals.png (4878 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413_astrometric_residuals.png (4881 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:28:59.87 +05:26:59.4: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:22:17.59 +05:22:45.2: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:05:49.43 +01:51:12.8: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:24:05.35 +07:12:58.3: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:32:47.96 +08:12:35.8: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:05:49.43 +01:51:12.8: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:32:47.96 +08:12:35.8: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:22:17.59 +05:22:45.2: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:24:05.35 +07:12:58.3: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:28:59.87 +05:26:59.4: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:32:47.96 +08:12:35.8: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2488 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:22:17.59 +05:22:45.2: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1761 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:24:05.35 +07:12:58.3: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3557 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:59.87 +05:26:59.4: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3663 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20332.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20315_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20315_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20323_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20323_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20332_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 20332_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20337_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20337_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20340_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20340_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
03:05:49.43 +01:51:12.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:26:03.544 +05:58:29.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:26:03.544 +05:58:29.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0738 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:26:03.601 +05:59:00.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:26:03.601 +05:59:00.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0735 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:26:03.544 +05:58:29.18
Second-epoch second image center 03:26:03.601 +05:59:00.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00863 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g88ST5s51i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SpQykb9Hwp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TLlDIcaCME
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fj2MRwzaha
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 40138 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2698 deg
Loaded 4347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3388 out of 3752 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3752 out of 40138 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.819500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.819500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 40138 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2698 deg
Loaded 4347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3388 out of 3752 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3752 out of 40138 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 36794 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4364 to 59.4140 deg, Dec +0.6695 to +11.2585 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4364 to 59.4140 deg, Dec 0.6695 to 11.2585 deg
Loaded 4354 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3421 out of 3757 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3757 out of 36794 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 90 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
2.0 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.g88ST5s51i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1702, bad_region=4, passed=40128
Got 40128 stars (including 38357 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40128 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1018 n_q3=1335 n_q4=1283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.315
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.SpQykb9Hwp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1580, bad_region=2, passed=36779
Got 36779 stars (including 35146 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36779 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1241 n_q2=1030 n_q3=1302 n_q4=1308 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.TLlDIcaCME (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1434, bad_region=32, passed=37735
Got 37735 stars (including 36203 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37735 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37735 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37735 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37735 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=11.361 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.785 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.394 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.400 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.280 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.286 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4883 robust_rms_before=0.990 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.289 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.280 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.299 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.286
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.299 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1330 n_q2=1304 n_q3=1020 n_q4=1229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.053
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fj2MRwzaha (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1388, bad_region=34, passed=37387
Got 37387 stars (including 35910 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37387 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=11.448 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.273 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.383 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.407 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.256 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.270 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4883 robust_rms_before=0.989 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.263 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.256 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.275 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.270
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.275 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=1328 n_q2=1293 n_q3=1021 n_q4=1241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-00-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-14_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_040323_TTUQ1b1x1_118091_YZqS1lUD/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:36:56.33 +02:54:49.7: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:24:16.29 +06:56:01.6: 14.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:31:05.31 +04:53:07.1: 14.88 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:42:13.89 +05:31:03.4: 15.09 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:03:46.65 +07:08:03.1: 14.91 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:03:16.00 +01:38:50.7: 14.29 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:01:53.38 +02:15:17.2: 14.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:17:44.13 +05:42:54.1: 14.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:20:42.81 +08:38:36.8: 15.30 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:14:49.06 +03:41:24.4: 13.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:01:53.38 +02:15:17.2: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:03:16.00 +01:38:50.7: 14.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:17:44.13 +05:42:54.1: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:31:05.31 +04:53:07.1: 14.77 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:24:16.29 +06:56:01.6: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:36:56.33 +02:54:49.7: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:42:13.89 +05:31:03.4: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:14:49.06 +03:41:24.4: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:20:42.81 +08:38:36.8: 15.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:16.00 +01:38:50.7: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6669 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:44.13 +05:42:54.1: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.6004 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:01:53.38 +02:15:17.2: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7240 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:05.31 +04:53:07.1: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8304 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:24:16.29 +06:56:01.6: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4969 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:36:56.33 +02:54:49.7: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0780 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:03:46.65 +07:08:03.1: 14.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:49.06 +03:41:24.4: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8732 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:13.89 +05:31:03.4: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8823 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:42.81 +08:38:36.8: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9601 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:46.65 +07:08:03.1: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8223 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:15:28.57 +03:04:01.9: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:42:29.27 +03:56:44.9: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:04:40.68 +03:27:52.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:07:52.30 +03:04:38.0: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:20:58.72 +08:27:33.0: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:17:12.41 +10:53:06.0: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:48:18.02 +08:47:52.6: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:14:32.99 +01:07:08.2: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:04:40.68 +03:27:52.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:15:28.57 +03:04:01.9: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:07:52.30 +03:04:38.0: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:42:29.27 +03:56:44.9: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:20:58.72 +08:27:33.0: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:52.30 +03:04:38.0: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8092 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:58.72 +08:27:33.0: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3727 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:29.27 +03:56:44.9: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4384 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:54:51.21 +09:21:42.3: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:17:12.41 +10:53:06.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:14:32.99 +01:07:08.2: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:48:18.02 +08:47:52.6: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:32.99 +01:07:08.2: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6496 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:18.02 +08:47:52.6: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8326 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:54:51.21 +09:21:42.3: 13.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:51.21 +09:21:42.3: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1057 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:43:57.97 +03:26:17.9: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:32:36.89 +03:56:38.9: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:35:49.25 +01:12:57.4: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:55:53.75 +05:36:46.6: 14.99 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:43:57.97 +03:26:17.9: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:57.97 +03:26:17.9: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2563 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:35:49.25 +01:12:57.4: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:35:49.25 +01:12:57.4: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2873 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:32:36.89 +03:56:38.9: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:32:36.89 +03:56:38.9: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2874 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:38:26.54 +04:36:55.6: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:55:53.75 +05:36:46.6: 14.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:55:53.75 +05:36:46.6: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5691 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:46:12.91 +06:33:54.6: 14.57 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:38:26.54 +04:36:55.6: 14.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:26.54 +04:36:55.6: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4956 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:57:15.80 +05:55:35.1: 15.22 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:54:37.24 +03:34:32.4: 15.46 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:59:01.23 +03:04:44.6: 14.90 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:46:12.91 +06:33:54.6: 14.40 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:12.91 +06:33:54.6: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5541 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:01:13.32 +03:13:54.7: 14.98 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:56:46.99 +04:58:37.2: 15.49 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:57:15.80 +05:55:35.1: 15.28 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:57:15.80 +05:55:35.1: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8187 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:54:37.24 +03:34:32.4: 15.17 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:59:01.23 +03:04:44.6: 15.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:54:37.24 +03:34:32.4: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.9051 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:59:01.23 +03:04:44.6: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8159 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:57:46.14 +08:38:14.7: 15.20 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:01:13.32 +03:13:54.7: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:01:13.32 +03:13:54.7: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9542 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:56:46.99 +04:58:37.2: 15.17 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:56:46.99 +04:58:37.2: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8990 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:00:54.06 +02:48:40.1: 15.13 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:57:46.14 +08:38:14.7: 15.28 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:57:46.14 +08:38:14.7: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8873 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:58:14.16 +05:58:18.2: 15.01 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:26:03.77 +03:31:04.2: 15.27 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:56:39.07 +06:33:28.8: 15.36 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:00:54.06 +02:48:40.1: 14.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:00:54.06 +02:48:40.1: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8318 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:58:14.16 +05:58:18.2: 15.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:58:14.16 +05:58:18.2: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9573 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:56:39.07 +06:33:28.8: 15.18 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:56:39.07 +06:33:28.8: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.0086 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:26:03.77 +03:31:04.2: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:01:58.44 +04:42:20.8: 15.30 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:03.77 +03:31:04.2: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7524 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:02:01.78 +09:47:00.0: 15.03 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:55:10.44 +07:00:09.4: 15.15 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:01:58.44 +04:42:20.8: 15.29 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:02:01.78 +09:47:00.0: 14.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:01:58.44 +04:42:20.8: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0198 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:02:01.78 +09:47:00.0: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9694 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:57:21.70 +03:43:04.6: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:55:10.44 +07:00:09.4: 14.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:55:10.44 +07:00:09.4: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9913 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:06:07.08 +03:07:39.4: 14.94 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:57:21.70 +03:43:04.6: 15.09 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:57:21.70 +03:43:04.6: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0164 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:59:36.08 +01:19:22.4: 14.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:57:17.48 +06:59:53.4: 15.53 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:06:07.08 +03:07:39.4: 14.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:06:07.08 +03:07:39.4: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9977 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:58:11.60 +04:44:45.1: 15.14 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:59:36.08 +01:19:22.4: 14.93 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:59:36.08 +01:19:22.4: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9047 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:57:17.48 +06:59:53.4: 15.17 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:57:31.95 +06:07:06.8: 15.27 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:17.48 +06:59:53.4: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7878 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:56:57.68 +04:58:25.0: 15.15 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:58:11.60 +04:44:45.1: 15.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:58:11.60 +04:44:45.1: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9873 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:57:14.08 +03:08:24.0: 15.08 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:57:31.95 +06:07:06.8: 15.34 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:57:31.95 +06:07:06.8: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0683 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:56:57.68 +04:58:25.0: 15.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:56:57.68 +04:58:25.0: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0931 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:57:14.08 +03:08:24.0: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:06:18.13 +03:13:58.9: 15.42 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:57:14.08 +03:08:24.0: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0171 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:17:48.83 +10:28:46.9: 14.99 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:09:21.17 +03:50:04.6: 15.34 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:06:18.13 +03:13:58.9: 15.25 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:06:18.13 +03:13:58.9: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9998 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:03:11.97 +05:09:22.2: 15.45 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:17:48.83 +10:28:46.9: 15.31 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:48.83 +10:28:46.9: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0476 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:09:21.17 +03:50:04.6: 15.61 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:21.17 +03:50:04.6: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9480 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:11:15.61 +06:43:16.1: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:03:33.88 +03:29:47.7: 15.38 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:56:16.14 +03:42:42.3: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:03:11.97 +05:09:22.2: 15.41 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:11.97 +05:09:22.2: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.1206 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:11:15.61 +06:43:16.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:03:33.88 +03:29:47.7: 15.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:33.88 +03:29:47.7: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0335 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:56:21.33 +04:39:35.2: 15.06 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:00:37.71 +10:20:15.3: 15.51 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:56:16.14 +03:42:42.3: 15.18 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.24
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:56:16.14 +03:42:42.3: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.24 new_mean_mag=15.0810 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:02:49.83 +10:05:59.9: 15.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:56:21.33 +04:39:35.2: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:56:21.33 +04:39:35.2: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8672 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:00:37.71 +10:20:15.3: 15.17 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:55:25.81 +08:40:55.6: 15.33 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:00:37.71 +10:20:15.3: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.0747 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:02:49.83 +10:05:59.9: 15.27 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:02:49.83 +10:05:59.9: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9489 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:59:42.23 +05:13:19.8: 15.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:05:23.33 +10:52:09.4: 15.26 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:55:25.81 +08:40:55.6: 15.17 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:25.81 +08:40:55.6: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8900 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:59:42.23 +05:13:19.8: 15.16 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:59:42.23 +05:13:19.8: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0377 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:18:56.53 +08:26:43.0: 15.17 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:02:55.41 +01:27:43.3: 15.39 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:09:12.41 +05:23:02.9: 15.22 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:05:23.33 +10:52:09.4: 15.14 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:23.33 +10:52:09.4: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9860 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:18:56.53 +08:26:43.0: 15.32 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:56.53 +08:26:43.0: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1234 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:02:55.41 +01:27:43.3: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:44:50.88 +03:20:14.9: 14.72 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:02:55.41 +01:27:43.3: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9888 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:09:12.41 +05:23:02.9: 15.27 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:12.41 +05:23:02.9: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0039 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:13:10.31 +04:58:25.1: 15.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:55:56.60 +08:28:10.8: 15.03 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:44:50.88 +03:20:14.9: 14.95 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:50.88 +03:20:14.9: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8433 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:13:10.31 +04:58:25.1: 15.36 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:10.31 +04:58:25.1: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1622 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:12:19.49 +01:50:01.1: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:55:56.60 +08:28:10.8: 15.23 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:56.60 +08:28:10.8: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9870 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:37:42.41 +02:58:32.5: 14.41 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:48:24.98 +10:24:14.5: 15.32 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:12:19.49 +01:50:01.1: 14.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:12:19.49 +01:50:01.1: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0532 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:53:54.13 +07:59:39.4: 15.39 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:46:39.43 +09:07:22.2: 15.10 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:37:42.41 +02:58:32.5: 14.57 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:42.41 +02:58:32.5: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7957 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:48:24.98 +10:24:14.5: 15.50 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:39:43.52 +05:37:28.8: 15.34 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:24.98 +10:24:14.5: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7634 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:40:45.15 +03:43:01.8: 15.44 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:53:30.83 +09:10:47.3: 15.22 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:53:54.13 +07:59:39.4: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:54.13 +07:59:39.4: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0246 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:46:39.43 +09:07:22.2: 15.34 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:39.43 +09:07:22.2: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9447 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:51:04.70 +10:17:57.7: 15.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:39:43.52 +05:37:28.8: 15.37 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:43.52 +05:37:28.8: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0780 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:40:45.15 +03:43:01.8: 15.63 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:45.15 +03:43:01.8: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.1011 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:53:30.83 +09:10:47.3: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:30.83 +09:10:47.3: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0406 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:47:14.26 +09:21:00.4: 15.29 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:53:15.74 +10:24:44.6: 15.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:51:04.70 +10:17:57.7: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:04.70 +10:17:57.7: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0193 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:47:14.26 +09:21:00.4: 15.01 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:14.26 +09:21:00.4: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9887 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:56:00.46 +10:35:07.0: 15.40 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:51:17.21 +09:55:46.9: 15.40 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:53:15.74 +10:24:44.6: 15.15 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:15.74 +10:24:44.6: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9969 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:51:17.21 +09:55:46.9: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:17.21 +09:55:46.9: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9481 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:56:00.46 +10:35:07.0: 15.35 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:00.46 +10:35:07.0: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=15.1160 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51630.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51814.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52009.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52557.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51424_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51424_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51426_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51426_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51428_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51428_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51435_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51435_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51436_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51436_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51437_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51437_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51438_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51438_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51442_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51442_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51446_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51446_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51449_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51449_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51450_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51450_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:34.79 +10:06:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51453_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51453_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51455_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51455_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:28.62 +01:35:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51602_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51602_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:05:49.43 +01:51:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51613_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51613_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51630_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 51630_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51695_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51695_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:07:19.98 +05:01:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51756_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51756_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:47.30 +09:11:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51814_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 51814_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51855_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51855_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51878_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51878_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51960_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 51960_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52009_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 52009_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52040_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52040_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:05:01.80 +01:54:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52055_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 52055_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52099_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52099_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52110_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52110_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52180_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52180_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52211_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52211_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52227_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52227_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:32.86 +08:47:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52278_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52278_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52302_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52302_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52309_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52309_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:58:39.62 +01:47:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52352_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52352_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52388_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52388_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52409_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52409_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52427_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52427_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52428_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52428_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52434_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52434_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52447_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52447_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52449_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52449_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52460_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52460_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52461_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52461_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52465_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52465_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52467_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52467_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52468_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52468_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52485_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52485_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52487_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52487_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52495_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52495_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52508_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52508_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52509_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52509_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52515_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52515_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52516_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52516_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52528_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52528_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52537_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52537_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52541_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52541_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52549_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52549_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52552_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52552_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52553_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52553_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52555_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52555_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52557_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 52557_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52561_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52561_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52562_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52562_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52564_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52564_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52570_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52570_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52571_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52571_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52572_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52572_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52579_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52579_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52583_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52583_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52593_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52593_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52594_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52594_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52600_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52600_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52604_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52604_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52610_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52610_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52621_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52621_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52634_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52634_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52646_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52646_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52677_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52677_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52681_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52681_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52684_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52684_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52690_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52690_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52694_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52694_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52706_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52706_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52731_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52731_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52744_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52744_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52764_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52764_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52783_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52783_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52785_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52785_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52820_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 52820_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50587_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 50587_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-14_04-01-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
