This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.1921 2461297.6922 14.80 15:00:02.86 +66:04:33.9
104.74707 46.25030 galactic UMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.3" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 15:00:02.86 +66:04:33.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits at 15:00:02.86 +66:04:33.9: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits at 15:00:02.86 +66:04:33.9: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461297.6922,14.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260914.1921 14.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 14.1921 2461297.6922 14.73 15:23:24.69 +65:28:17.2
101.77972 44.91122 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.3" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 15:23:24.69 +65:28:17.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits at 15:23:24.69 +65:28:17.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits at 15:23:24.69 +65:28:17.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461297.6922,14.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260914.1921 14.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461199.78168939 08.06.2026 06:45:27.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
First image: 2461199.78168939 08.06.2026 06:45:27.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
Last image: 2461297.69236882 14.09.2026 04:36:50.666 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6293
Objects passed selection criteria: 6283
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5525.25
Average stars matched: 5424 (98.1675 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233196 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 14 00:14:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461199.78168939 08.06.2026 06:45:27.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
First image: 2461199.78168939 08.06.2026 06:45:27.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
Last image: 2461297.69236882 14.09.2026 04:36:50.666 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 76
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.99
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 22 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 35040
Objects passed selection criteria: 34952
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 32056.8
Average stars matched: 31167.2 (97.2252 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 259436 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 14 00:15:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461297.69193152
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:39.854 +62:00:40.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:41.223 +62:00:10.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:39.854 +62:00:40.61
Second-epoch image center 15:25:41.223 +62:00:10.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0087 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:41.525 +62:00:08.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:39.854 +62:00:40.61
Second-epoch image center 15:25:41.525 +62:00:08.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0094 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:41.223 +62:00:10.86
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:41.525 +62:00:08.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00079 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00079 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vkBgb4HPMH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KeJZqiD9z6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ABOforL1cn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cAhy8QVbhn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits and wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits and wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits and wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8441 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 212.2366 to 250.7097 deg, Dec +55.9113 to +67.2630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 212.2366 to 250.7097 deg, Dec 55.9113 to 67.2630 deg
Loaded 7134 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4748 out of 4924 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4924 out of 8441 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.680200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.680200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8441 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 212.2366 to 250.7097 deg, Dec +55.9113 to +67.2630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 212.2366 to 250.7097 deg, Dec 55.9113 to 67.2630 deg
Loaded 7134 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4748 out of 4924 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4924 out of 8441 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 8392 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 212.2365 to 250.7373 deg, Dec +55.9113 to +67.2631 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 212.2365 to 250.7373 deg, Dec 55.9113 to 67.2631 deg
Loaded 7144 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4752 out of 4916 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4916 out of 8392 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
2.3 pix Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
2.4 pix fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
2.3 pix fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
15.4 mag. Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.vkBgb4HPMH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, bad_region=1819, passed=8441
Got 8441 stars (including 6205 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8441 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1631 n_q2=927 n_q3=1506 n_q4=813 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits -region wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KeJZqiD9z6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=489, bad_region=1827, passed=8392
Got 8392 stars (including 6177 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8392 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1634 n_q2=924 n_q3=1514 n_q4=808 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits -region wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ABOforL1cn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=312, bad_region=758, passed=5130
Got 5130 stars (including 4081 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5130 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3998 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3993 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3993 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3996 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3990 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3990 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 3990 stars left (next iteration limit 4392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3990 robust_rms=5.913 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.818 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3990 robust_rms=0.563 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.625 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3990 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.420 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3990 robust_rms_before=0.769 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.376 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.398 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.420
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.398 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits N_match=3990 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=1515 n_q2=677 n_q3=1340 n_q4=458 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.cAhy8QVbhn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=776, passed=5435
Got 5435 stars (including 4364 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5435 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4273 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4269 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4269 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4272 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4268 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4268 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4268 stars left (next iteration limit 4695)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4268 robust_rms=6.075 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.576 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4268 robust_rms=0.569 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.647 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4268 robust_rms=0.379 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.407 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4268 robust_rms_before=0.780 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.373 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.379 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.389 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.407
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.389 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits N_match=4268 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=1539 n_q2=784 n_q3=1425 n_q4=520 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.181
ref2=Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.171
new1=fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.100
new2=fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits sigma_overall=0.384 worst_q_ratio=1.051
reference average sigma_overall=0.34 worst_q_ratio=1.176
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215_astrometric_residuals.png (4877 matched stars from wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200_astrometric_residuals.png (3990 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201_astrometric_residuals.png (4268 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:39.854 +62:00:40.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:41.223 +62:00:10.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:39.854 +62:00:40.61
Second-epoch image center 15:25:41.223 +62:00:10.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0087 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:41.525 +62:00:08.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:39.854 +62:00:40.61
Second-epoch image center 15:25:41.525 +62:00:08.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0094 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:41.223 +62:00:10.86
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:41.525 +62:00:08.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00079 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00079 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xfBuLQoHS6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xlFaMMFuG6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HEoCL9nnx7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0p5LRIxo0Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits and wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits and wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits and wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43673 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 212.1497 to 251.0234 deg, Dec +55.8902 to +67.2772 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 212.1497 to 251.0234 deg, Dec 55.8902 to 67.2772 deg
Loaded 7254 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4533 out of 4976 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4976 out of 43673 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.561700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.561700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.99
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43673 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 212.1497 to 251.0234 deg, Dec +55.8902 to +67.2772 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 212.1497 to 251.0234 deg, Dec 55.8902 to 67.2772 deg
Loaded 7254 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4533 out of 4976 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4976 out of 43673 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 43634 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 212.1487 to 250.9057 deg, Dec +55.8905 to +67.2680 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 212.1487 to 250.9057 deg, Dec 55.8905 to 67.2680 deg
Loaded 7221 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4534 out of 4973 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4973 out of 43634 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 38 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
2.2 pix Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
2.2 pix fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
2.2 pix fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
15.6 mag. Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xfBuLQoHS6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2064, bad_region=6994, passed=43656
Got 43656 stars (including 34917 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4868 stars left (next iteration limit 5354)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits N_match=4868 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1634 n_q2=961 n_q3=1457 n_q4=816 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits -region wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xlFaMMFuG6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=2012, bad_region=6972, passed=43612
Got 43612 stars (including 34952 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43612 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5353)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits N_match=4867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=1637 n_q2=939 n_q3=1466 n_q4=825 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits -region wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HEoCL9nnx7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1246, bad_region=3062, passed=30345
Got 30345 stars (including 26160 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30345 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4863 stars left (next iteration limit 5350)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4863 robust_rms=5.525 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=19.947 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4863 robust_rms=0.556 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.595 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4863 robust_rms=0.392 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.415 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4863 robust_rms_before=0.742 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.376 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.392 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.402 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.415
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.402 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits N_match=4863 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=1836 n_q2=823 n_q3=1629 n_q4=575 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0p5LRIxo0Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1297, bad_region=3200, passed=31748
Got 31748 stars (including 27384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=5.834 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.484 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.555 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.633 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.379 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.410 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4864 robust_rms_before=0.751 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.367 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.379 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.384 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.410
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.384 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.404 n_q1=1768 n_q2=880 n_q3=1593 n_q4=623 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_235859_TTUQ2b1x1_4017799_2wqB7FSO/wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits at 16:18:46.53 +59:17:18.1: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits at 15:52:51.42 +57:50:10.0: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits at 16:02:20.71 +65:22:35.4: 14.94 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits at 15:56:43.08 +63:45:29.7: 15.14 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits at 16:02:20.71 +65:22:35.4: 14.86 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits at 15:56:43.08 +63:45:29.7: 15.24 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:20.71 +65:22:35.4: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7297 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:43.08 +63:45:29.7: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8118 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits at 15:52:51.42 +57:50:10.0: 14.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits at 16:18:46.53 +59:17:18.1: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:51.42 +57:50:10.0: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6362 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:46.53 +59:17:18.1: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1999 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits at 16:20:47.14 +61:43:30.0: 15.30 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits at 15:00:02.86 +66:04:33.9: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits at 15:23:24.69 +65:28:17.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits at 16:20:47.14 +61:43:30.0: 15.15 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:47.14 +61:43:30.0: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9864 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits at 16:16:22.21 +59:08:02.1: 15.34 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits at 15:00:02.86 +66:04:33.9: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits at 15:23:24.69 +65:28:17.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits at 16:16:22.21 +59:08:02.1: 15.15 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:22.21 +59:08:02.1: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8124 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53189.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53219.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52684_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52684_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52685_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52685_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52686_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52686_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52692_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52692_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52701_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52701_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52715_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52715_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52719_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52719_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52734_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52734_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52744_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52744_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52745_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52745_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52770_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52770_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52805_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52805_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:24:43.70 +57:45:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52821_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52821_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52823_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52823_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52852_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52852_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52862_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52862_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52888_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52888_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52897_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52897_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52922_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52922_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:19:38.95 +60:13:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52928_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52928_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52935_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52935_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52937_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52937_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:20:19.47 +65:06:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52939_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52939_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:05:39.58 +64:02:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52946_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52946_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52959_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 52959_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53005_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 53005_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53068_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 53068_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53093_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 53093_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53118_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 53118_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53143_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 53143_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53148_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 53148_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53154_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 53154_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53189_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
Preparing report for the candidate 53189_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53201_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 53201_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53219_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
Preparing report for the candidate 53219_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34340_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 34340_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16638_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 16638_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33773_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201
The candidate 33773_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-13_23-36-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks