This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.4509 2461296.9509 10.11 22:35:08.99 +16:32:33.5
81.82507 -35.23008 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2736623457293876480 | 22:35:09.02 +16:32:34.0 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: F2 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.321+/-0.027 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 22:35:08.99 +16:32:33.5: 11.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 22:35:08.99 +16:32:33.5: 11.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.25 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2736623457293876480,2461296.9509,10.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2736623457293876480 20260913.4509 10.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.4509 2461296.9509 10.74 22:35:08.64 +16:09:55.0
81.54067 -35.52780 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2736531648073708160 | 22:35:08.56 +16:09:54.7 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.370+/-0.026 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 22:35:08.64 +16:09:55.0: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 22:35:08.64 +16:09:55.0: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2736531648073708160,2461296.9509,10.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2736531648073708160 20260913.4509 10.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.4509 2461296.9509 10.96 23:36:19.20 +14:39:48.0
97.08624 -44.40600 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:36:19.20 +14:39:48.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.250+/-0.031 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 23:36:19.20 +14:39:48.0: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 23:36:19.20 +14:39:48.0: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461296.9509,10.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260913.4509 10.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.4509 2461296.9509 11.09 23:36:16.97 +14:47:24.9
97.14585 -44.28612 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:36:16.97 +14:47:24.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.475+/-0.030 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 23:36:16.97 +14:47:24.9: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 23:36:16.97 +14:47:24.9: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461296.9509,11.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260913.4509 11.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.4509 2461296.9509 11.27 23:35:10.68 +14:58:55.0
96.91275 -44.00323 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" Gaia DR3 2813337620516705024
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.620 G 12.640 G G
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 23:35:10.68 +14:58:55.0: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 23:35:10.68 +14:58:55.0: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2813337620516705024,2461296.9509,11.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2813337620516705024 20260913.4509 11.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.4509 2461296.9509 11.19 23:36:48.24 +14:34:54.3
97.19084 -44.52762 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:36:48.24 +14:34:54.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.453+/-0.032 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 23:36:48.24 +14:34:54.3: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 23:36:48.24 +14:34:54.3: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461296.9509,11.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260913.4509 11.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.4509 2461296.9509 10.69 23:35:54.69 +14:38:47.5
96.95018 -44.38167 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2813268591802335872 | 23:35:54.64 +14:38:47.7 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.716+/-0.031 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 23:35:54.69 +14:38:47.5: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 23:35:54.69 +14:38:47.5: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2813268591802335872,2461296.9509,10.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2813268591802335872 20260913.4509 10.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.4509 2461296.9509 10.73 23:36:10.78 +14:44:40.8
97.08839 -44.31789 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2813271615459329408 | 23:36:10.75 +14:44:40.4 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.446+/-0.031 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 23:36:10.78 +14:44:40.8: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 23:36:10.78 +14:44:40.8: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2813271615459329408,2461296.9509,10.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2813271615459329408 20260913.4509 10.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.4509 2461296.9509 10.46 23:37:01.85 +14:39:34.2
97.30485 -44.47819 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2819259693222556544 | 23:37:01.80 +14:39:34.4 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.334+/-0.032 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 23:37:01.85 +14:39:34.2: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 23:37:01.85 +14:39:34.2: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2819259693222556544,2461296.9509,10.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2819259693222556544 20260913.4509 10.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.4509 2461296.9509 10.36 22:35:13.26 +16:15:50.1
81.63280 -35.46113 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2736579614268458112 | 22:35:13.26 +16:15:50.0 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.651+/-0.028 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 22:35:13.26 +16:15:50.1: 11.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 22:35:13.26 +16:15:50.1: 11.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.36 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2736579614268458112,2461296.9509,10.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2736579614268458112 20260913.4509 10.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
***** IMAGE PROCESSING ERROR (less than 4 images processed) *****
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.89976286 21.07.2026 09:35:29.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
First image: 2461242.89976286 21.07.2026 09:35:29.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
Last image: 2461296.95133060 13.09.2026 10:49:44.964 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 40
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.04
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 47928
Objects passed selection criteria: 47693
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.0 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.0 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 26270.5
Average stars matched: 25402.5 (96.6959 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 270516 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 13 05:52:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
Last image: 2461296.95049325 13.09.2026 10:48:32.617 UTC
WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Peg-10-Q1b1x1 as too few input images were matched to the reference image - wrong pointing? clouds? very bad focus?
Blind plate solve of the unmatched second-epoch image fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits to check the telescope pointing
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 70 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2670355.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2670355.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 26.193 (2.37388e+11), 8 match, 0 conflict, 20 distractors, 370 index.
RA,Dec = (346.738,13.9854), pixel scale 5.916 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+----++---+-------+-+---+(best)--------+----+--------+----+-----------+++
Field 1: solved with index index-4112.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2670355.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2670355.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (346.794450, 14.020099) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (23:07:10.668, +14:01:12.358).
Field size: 15.275 x 10.5585 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -175.893 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits' -> 'fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits'
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Sep 13 05:51 fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Sep 13 05:51 out2670355.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits (fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2670355.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2670355.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.0783 degrees of RA,Dec (346.794,14.0193)
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-100).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-100).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-100).
log-odds ratio 26.193 (2.37388e+11), 8 match, 0 conflict, 20 distractors, 370 index.
RA,Dec = (346.738,13.9854), pixel scale 5.916 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+----++---+-------+-+---+(best)--------+----+--------+----+-----------+++
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)
Field 1: solved with index index-4112.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2670355.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2670355.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (346.736870, 13.984592) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (23:06:56.849, +13:59:04.533).
Field size: 15.4418 x 10.3999 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -175.029 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Sep 13 05:51 fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Sep 13 05:51 out2670355.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 1002 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [62.9856, 944.193] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 11.7729
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 11.2024
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 23.2202 (1.2145e+10), 2 match, 0 conflict, 0 distractors, 50 index.
RA,Dec = (346.738,13.9854), pixel scale 5.916 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++(best)--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
--> log-odds 23.2202
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 23.504 (1.61311e+10), 4 match, 0 conflict, 15 distractors, 95 index.
RA,Dec = (346.738,13.9854), pixel scale 5.916 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++--------+-------+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--> log-odds 23.504
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 17.8212 (5.49096e+07), 2 match, 0 conflict, 0 distractors, 193 index.
RA,Dec = (346.738,13.9854), pixel scale 5.91597 arcsec/pix.
--> log-odds 20.5189
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 20.018 (4.93965e+08), 7 match, 0 conflict, 19 distractors, 370 index.
RA,Dec = (346.738,13.9854), pixel scale 5.9164 arcsec/pix.
--> log-odds 19.2172
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 31.85 (6.79608e+13), 20 match, 0 conflict, 68 distractors, 709 index.
RA,Dec = (346.738,13.9854), pixel scale 5.91851 arcsec/pix.
--> log-odds 17.9165
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 32.2341 (9.97942e+13), 20 match, 0 conflict, 61 distractors, 1403 index.
RA,Dec = (346.738,13.9854), pixel scale 5.91855 arcsec/pix.
--> log-odds 16.5515
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [62.9856, 944.193] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 11.7729
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 11.2024
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 23.2202 (1.2145e+10), 2 match, 0 conflict, 0 distractors, 50 index.
RA,Dec = (346.738,13.9854), pixel scale 5.916 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++(best)--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
--> log-odds 23.2202
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 23.504 (1.61311e+10), 4 match, 0 conflict, 15 distractors, 95 index.
RA,Dec = (346.738,13.9854), pixel scale 5.916 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++--------+-------+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--> log-odds 23.504
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 17.8212 (5.49096e+07), 2 match, 0 conflict, 0 distractors, 193 index.
RA,Dec = (346.738,13.9854), pixel scale 5.91597 arcsec/pix.
--> log-odds 20.5189
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 20.018 (4.93965e+08), 7 match, 0 conflict, 19 distractors, 370 index.
RA,Dec = (346.738,13.9854), pixel scale 5.9164 arcsec/pix.
--> log-odds 19.2172
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 31.85 (6.79608e+13), 20 match, 0 conflict, 68 distractors, 709 index.
RA,Dec = (346.738,13.9854), pixel scale 5.91851 arcsec/pix.
--> log-odds 17.9165
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 32.2341 (9.97942e+13), 20 match, 0 conflict, 61 distractors, 1403 index.
RA,Dec = (346.738,13.9854), pixel scale 5.91855 arcsec/pix.
--> log-odds 16.5515
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (346.757606, 13.975581) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (23:07:01.826, +13:58:32.091).
Field size: 15.3904 x 10.5079 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -174.714 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Image size: 925.4'x627.3' 15.4(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.80"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:07:01.613 +13:58:29.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 72 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2670903.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the blindly solved unmatched second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:06:39.243 +14:00:09.40
Second-epoch image center 23:07:01.613 +13:58:29.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0946 deg.
###################################
The second-epoch image center is consistent with the reference image center (offset 0.0946 deg.) - the star matching failure is probably not a pointing problem
____ VaST output ____
--==VaST 1.0rc90==--
Parsing command line arguments...
opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor
opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius!
opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching!
opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source!
opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted!
opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope)
opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag!
WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars.
opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done!
opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually!
opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored!
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images
Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found.
This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file.
Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb)... OK
Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor
Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files.
Done with cleaning!
VaST was started with the following command line:
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
Preparing to process 4 input FITS images...
######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ########
transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search!
transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search!
transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit
transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!!
transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3
transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars
transient search mode: not discarding large sources
################
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix
We have 4 images to process.
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits catalog from cache
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits catalog from cache
Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads...
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits
Parent process says: we are done fork()ing.
Waiting for thread 2 to finish...
The gain value (GAIN=0.370) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
The gain value (GAIN=0.370) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 6.2,6.2,5.6,6.9,7.5,8.1 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.9,5.9,5.3,6.5,7.1,7.7 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
Waiting for thread 1 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Done with SExtractor!
TIMING SExtractor: 1 seconds
Matching stars between images!
No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine.
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-07-21T09:35:29.5117758
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-07-21T09:35:29.5117758
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-07-21T09:35:29.511
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
Exposure 20 sec, 21.07.2026 09:35:29.511 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461242.89976286 mid. exp.
The reference image star 6966.104 5038.383 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 9269, (9269 good for image matching)
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 1
* rejected close to frame edge: 52
* rejected as being too small (<1.6 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>6.3 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 4
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will not be applied.
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.30
Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.3 (4.5 sigma detection)
The simple faintest star detection limit= -9.4
80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -10.3
Selected detection limit= -10.3
Final detection limit= -10.3 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0)
Parameter box for transient search: 10.06.3 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 1
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
8905 * detected, using 480/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.005934, number_of_ambiguous_matches=55
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=1 pairs=8562 inliers=8562 rms 0.32 -> 0.32 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002805, number_of_ambiguous_matches=26
8559 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=8559 inliers=8559 rms 0.14 -> 0.14 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001834, number_of_ambiguous_matches=17
8559 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=2 pairs=8559 inliers=8559 rms 0.09 -> 0.09 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001079, number_of_ambiguous_matches=10
8559 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = -0.001
8905 stars detected, 8559 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 8090, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 8090 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 8085 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.32
9615 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory: 201220 kB used, 234900 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-09-13T10:48:32.6176516
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-09-13T10:48:32.6176516
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-09-13T10:48:32.617
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 70
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 0
* rejected close to frame edge: 2
* rejected as being too small (<1.5 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>5.9 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 0
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
70 * detected, using 100/ 70 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
the annealed match radius failed on this field, retrying with the strict radius... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
Too few * matched: 1 < 14 ! Retrying...
rotation [degrees] = -0.001
70 stars detected, 1 stars matched
ERROR! Too few stars matched (1 < 14) . Wrong match? Skipping file...
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-09-13T10:49:44.9642280
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-09-13T10:49:44.9642280
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-09-13T10:49:44.964
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 64
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 0
* rejected close to frame edge: 1
* rejected as being too small (<1.6 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>6.2 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 0
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
64 * detected, using 100/ 64 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
the annealed match radius failed on this field, retrying with the strict radius... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
Too few * matched: 0 < 12 ! Retrying...
rotation [degrees] = -0.001
64 stars detected, 0 stars matched
ERROR! Too few stars matched (0 < 12) . Wrong match? Skipping file...
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
Done with measurements! =)
Total number of measurements 18174 (18174 measurements stored in RAM)
Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory...
Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory...
Creating vast_image_details.log ...
Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK
Selecting the best aperture for each source
Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 2490 stars
Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars
Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 2291 stars
Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 1220 stars
Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 1192 stars
Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 1366 stars
done! =)
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
WARNING: Can't open candidates-transients.lst for reading! -- No candidates found?
Non-zero exit code of lib/transient_list
ERROR running lib/create_list_of_candidate_transients.sh
Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve
You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make'
Computing, please wait a bit
....................................................................................
vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 8484 objects, the longest string is 384 bytes.
Allocating memory for resorting the file.
----***** VaST processing WARNING *****----
You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one.
Please investigate this!
**************************************************************
This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by
inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic
messages printed above (or the vast*.log files):
* How many of the input images are matched?
* Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable?
* Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent?
You may run
./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit
to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings
(star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration
file, see various examples in the VaST directory).
If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky
Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log
file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please
upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/
**************************************************************
Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1)
_____________________
ERROR running VaST on the field Peg-10-Q1b1x1 (less than 4 images processed)
exp_start= 21.07.2026 09:35:29.511 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461242.89976286 ap= 6.3 rotation= 0.000 *detected= 9269 *matched= 9269 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
exp_start= 22.07.2026 09:33:35.950 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461243.89844850 ap= 6.3 rotation= -0.001 *detected= 8905 *matched= 8559 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits
exp_start= 13.09.2026 10:48:32.617 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461296.95049325 ap= 5.9 rotation= -0.001 *detected= 70 *matched= 1 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
exp_start= 13.09.2026 10:49:44.964 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461296.95133060 ap= 6.2 rotation= -0.001 *detected= 64 *matched= 0 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461296.95049325
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:06:39.243 +14:00:09.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:06:40.938 +14:00:51.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:06:39.243 +14:00:09.40
Second-epoch image center 23:06:40.938 +14:00:51.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0136 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:06:43.547 +14:01:22.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:06:39.243 +14:00:09.40
Second-epoch image center 23:06:43.547 +14:01:22.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0268 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:06:40.938 +14:00:51.89
Second-epoch second image center 23:06:43.547 +14:01:22.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01363 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8xxfYZg3DK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8QLLtMVU3T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pF2hvReWvp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NoRsRj9FPj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits and wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits and wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits and wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits) and catalog (wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 52987 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.3668 to 354.8803 deg, Dec +8.6362 to +19.2696 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.3668 to 354.8803 deg, Dec 8.6362 to 19.2696 deg
Loaded 5972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4571 out of 5107 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5107 out of 52987 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.574300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.574300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.04
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 52987 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.3668 to 354.8803 deg, Dec +8.6362 to +19.2696 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.3668 to 354.8803 deg, Dec 8.6362 to 19.2696 deg
Loaded 5972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4571 out of 5107 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5107 out of 52987 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 51434 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.3689 to 354.8805 deg, Dec +8.6361 to +19.2674 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.3689 to 354.8805 deg, Dec 8.6361 to 19.2674 deg
Loaded 5969 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4607 out of 5109 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5109 out of 51434 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 16 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
2.1 pix Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits
2.2 pix fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
2.2 pix fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
15.5 mag. Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits
11.4 mag. fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
11.6 mag. fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 11.4 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.8xxfYZg3DK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits' -> 'wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2646, bad_region=0, passed=52963
Got 52963 stars (including 50236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52963 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4868 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits N_match=4868 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1235 n_q2=1157 n_q3=1328 n_q4=1148 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits -region wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8QLLtMVU3T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits' -> 'wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2452, bad_region=0, passed=51417
Got 51417 stars (including 48885 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51417 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51417 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51417 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51417 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4868 stars left (next iteration limit 5354)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits N_match=4868 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.400 n_q1=1243 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1346 n_q4=1138 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits -region wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pF2hvReWvp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=20, bad_region=6, passed=778
Got 778 stars (including 749 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 778 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 549 (Dec 8.6 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 680 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 671 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 671 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 709 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 549 (Dec 8.6 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 680 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 668 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.95"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 668 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.95"
Excluding outliers - 668 stars left (next iteration limit 738)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=668 robust_rms=10.191 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=18.894 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=668 robust_rms=0.911 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.963 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=668 robust_rms_before=1.216 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.981 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.911 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=1.155 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.963
verification OK: wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:06:40.961 +14:00:51.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 778 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2674500.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 1.216 -> 0.911 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 4.6 arcsec, 668 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 549 (Dec 8.6 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 647 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 647 pairs (668 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=647 robust_rms=9.785 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=19.532 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=647 robust_rms=0.899 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.923 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=647 robust_rms_before=0.902 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.902 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.899 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.946 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.923
verification OK: wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:06:40.962 +14:00:51.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 778 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2674605.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.902 -> 0.899 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 647 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 647 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits N_match=647 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.907 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.789 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.906 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.988 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.010 n_q1=109 n_q2=322 n_q3=152 n_q4=64 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits -region wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NoRsRj9FPj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=13, bad_region=7, passed=664
Got 664 stars (including 641 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 664 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 549 (Dec 8.6 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 586 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 582 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 582 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 606 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 549 (Dec 8.6 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 585 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 583 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 606 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 583 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 606 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.91"
Excluding outliers - 583 stars left (next iteration limit 640)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: the 583 catalog matches do not cover the frame (160/238/178/7 per quadrant, need 36 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits N_match=583 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.973 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.004 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.929 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.892 sigma_q4_arcsec=2.312 n_q1=160 n_q2=238 n_q3=178 n_q4=7 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.377
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits -region wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-48-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_055028_TTUQ1b1x1_2665212_E4UJtBjb/wcs_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Peg-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 22:36:18.77 +16:30:56.7: 10.12 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 22:35:15.71 +17:07:42.9: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 22:35:07.85 +15:47:18.1: 10.57 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 22:35:31.31 +17:05:56.6: 9.86 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 22:35:08.64 +16:09:55.0: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 22:35:14.29 +16:41:04.3: 9.76 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 22:39:37.36 +18:46:24.4: 10.03 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 22:35:08.99 +16:32:33.5: 11.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 23:36:19.20 +14:39:48.0: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 23:36:16.97 +14:47:24.9: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 22:36:18.77 +16:30:56.7: 10.11 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 22:35:08.64 +16:09:55.0: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 22:35:07.85 +15:47:18.1: 10.55 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 22:35:14.29 +16:41:04.3: 9.74 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 22:35:15.71 +17:07:42.9: 10.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 22:35:31.31 +17:05:56.6: 9.86 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 22:39:37.36 +18:46:24.4: 10.03 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 22:35:08.99 +16:32:33.5: 11.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.56 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.11 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.86 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.75 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.16 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.25 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:36:18.77 +16:30:56.7: ref_mag=10.11 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2151 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:35:31.31 +17:05:56.6: ref_mag=9.86 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7288 delta=-0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:35:08.64 +16:09:55.0: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.6402 delta=1.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:35:07.85 +15:47:18.1: ref_mag=10.56 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8698 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:39:37.36 +18:46:24.4: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3738 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:35:14.29 +16:41:04.3: ref_mag=9.75 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.4318 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:35:15.71 +17:07:42.9: ref_mag=10.16 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5166 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:35:08.99 +16:32:33.5: ref_mag=11.25 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0232 delta=1.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 23:36:16.97 +14:47:24.9: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 23:36:19.20 +14:39:48.0: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:36:16.97 +14:47:24.9: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0822 delta=1.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:36:19.20 +14:39:48.0: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.9629 delta=1.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 23:35:54.69 +14:38:47.5: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 23:35:10.68 +14:58:55.0: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 23:37:01.85 +14:39:34.2: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 22:35:13.26 +16:15:50.1: 11.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 23:36:48.24 +14:34:54.3: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0963.fits at 23:36:10.78 +14:44:40.8: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 23:35:10.68 +14:58:55.0: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 23:36:10.78 +14:44:40.8: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:35:10.68 +14:58:55.0: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2738 delta=1.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 23:35:54.69 +14:38:47.5: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:36:10.78 +14:44:40.8: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7425 delta=1.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 22:35:13.26 +16:15:50.1: 11.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:35:54.69 +14:38:47.5: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.6781 delta=1.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 23:36:48.24 +14:34:54.3: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-33-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0432.fits at 23:37:01.85 +14:39:34.2: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.36 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:35:13.26 +16:15:50.1: ref_mag=11.36 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3592 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:36:48.24 +14:34:54.3: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1632 delta=1.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:37:01.85 +14:39:34.2: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4641 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28348.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28651.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28750.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28767.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out29213.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out29472.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out39952.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out48816.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66229.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66314.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66193_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205
The candidate 66193_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66224_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205
The candidate 66224_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66229_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205
Preparing report for the candidate 66229_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66241_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205
The candidate 66241_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66253_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205
The candidate 66253_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66256_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205
The candidate 66256_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66279_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205
The candidate 66279_fd_Peg-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_05-49-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0205 did not pass the final checks