This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 13.2982* 05 21 07.63 +23 38 19.7 10.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461296.7982,10.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260913.2982 10.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 13.2982* 05 21 07.66 +23 38 19.2 10.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461296.7982,10.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260913.2982 10.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.2982 2461296.7982 12.93 05:41:46.86 +24:09:32.2
183.62173 -3.23346 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia -1 0 1 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:41:46.86 +24:09:32.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:41:46.86 +24:09:32.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 13.2982* 05 41 46.86 +24 09 32.2 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461296.7982,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260913.2982 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.2982 2461296.7982 13.27 05:20:47.39 +17:18:28.0
186.78442 -11.05339 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.53 Kalypso 0 -1 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:47.39 +17:18:28.0: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:47.39 +17:18:28.0: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 13.2982* 05 20 47.39 +17 18 28.0 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461296.7982,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260913.2982 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.2982 2461296.7982 14.04 05:19:16.98 +26:54:12.1
178.53483 -5.98551 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.422 Berolina 1 -1 2 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:16.98 +26:54:12.1: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:16.98 +26:54:12.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 13.2982* 05 19 16.98 +26 54 12.1 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461296.7982,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260913.2982 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.2982 2461296.7982 13.30 05:41:26.66 +23:00:13.6
184.56567 -3.90637 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 05:41:26.66 +23:00:13.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:41:26.66 +23:00:13.6: 14.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:41:26.66 +23:00:13.6: 14.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 13.2982* 05 41 26.66 +23 00 13.6 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461296.7982,13.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260913.2982 13.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.2982 2461296.7982 13.47 05:40:36.15 +23:13:20.8
184.27718 -3.95588 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J054036.18+231321.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.270 g Y 0.430 g 2458564.53800 51.670000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:40:36.15 +23:13:20.8: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:40:36.15 +23:13:20.8: 14.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 13.2982* 05 40 36.15 +23 13 20.8 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J054036.18+231321.6,2461296.7982,13.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J054036.18+231321.6 20260913.2982 13.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.2982 2461296.7982 13.32 05:42:52.12 +24:29:56.0
183.46232 -2.84409 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS 6937979
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.500 R1 12.800 R1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:52.12 +24:29:56.0: 14.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:52.12 +24:29:56.0: 14.62 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 13.2982* 05 42 52.12 +24 29 56.0 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 6937979,2461296.7982,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 6937979 20260913.2982 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.2982 2461296.7982 13.29 05:40:51.29 +24:09:34.7
183.50970 -3.41268 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.4335 Verona 44 -419 421 17.3 -0 -0
ATTENTION: measured mag 13.29 is 4.0 mag brighter than the predicted asteroid brightness 17.3 - the transient may be an unrelated new object!
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:40:51.29 +24:09:34.7: 14.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:40:51.29 +24:09:34.7: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 13.2982* 05 40 51.29 +24 09 34.7 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461296.7982,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260913.2982 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 13.2982 2461296.7982 12.90 05:39:38.30 +22:51:35.9
184.46856 -4.33556 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J053938.27+225136.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.760 g Y 0.290 g 2459188.68800 38.640000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:39:38.30 +22:51:35.9: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:39:38.30 +22:51:35.9: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 13.2982* 05 39 38.30 +22 51 35.9 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J053938.27+225136.7,2461296.7982,12.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J053938.27+225136.7 20260913.2982 12.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461296.79856619 13.09.2026 07:09:46.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20255
Objects passed selection criteria: 20168
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15144.5
Average stars matched: 14944.2 (98.6777 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249052 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 13 02:22:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461296.79856619 13.09.2026 07:09:46.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 138
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 61 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 150541
Objects passed selection criteria: 150145
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 111310
Average stars matched: 107860 (96.9003 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 616224 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 13 02:25:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461296.79776465
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.837 +22:00:05.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:19.837 +22:00:05.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0023 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Image size: 944.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:22.567 +21:59:25.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:22.567 +21:59:25.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0146 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:19.837 +22:00:05.31
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:22.567 +21:59:25.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01524 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JFKZjFskFI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vfi76hYNHh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ScTvQV5bij
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yTLvv4VMZx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.JFKZjFskFI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Vfi76hYNHh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ScTvQV5bij (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=370, bad_region=0, passed=8380
Got 8380 stars (including 8005 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8380 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4786 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4785 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5182)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4713 robust_rms=7.343 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.471 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4713 robust_rms=0.503 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.610 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4713 robust_rms=0.416 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.510 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4713 robust_rms_before=1.442 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.459 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.416 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.614 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.510
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.931 +22:00:03.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8380 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3422744.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.442 -> 0.416 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4713 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4490 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4490 pairs (4713 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4490 robust_rms=7.104 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.302 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4490 robust_rms=0.495 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.572 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4490 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.495 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4490 robust_rms_before=0.405 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.405 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.495 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.495
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.930 +22:00:03.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8380 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3439606.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.405 -> 0.404 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4490 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4490 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits N_match=4490 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.442 n_q1=1139 n_q2=803 n_q3=1040 n_q4=1508 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.yTLvv4VMZx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=375, bad_region=0, passed=8618
Got 8618 stars (including 8234 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4785 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5185)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4716 robust_rms=7.686 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.329 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4716 robust_rms=0.513 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.735 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4716 robust_rms=0.402 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.491 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4716 robust_rms_before=1.486 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.458 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.402 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.621 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.491
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.8' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:22.670 +21:59:24.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8618 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3422726.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.486 -> 0.402 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4716 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4489 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4489 pairs (4716 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4489 robust_rms=7.474 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.060 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4489 robust_rms=0.505 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.697 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4489 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.475 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4489 robust_rms_before=0.394 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.394 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.393 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.477 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.475
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.8' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:22.670 +21:59:24.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8618 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3438432.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.394 -> 0.393 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4489 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4489 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=4489 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=1140 n_q2=833 n_q3=1025 n_q4=1491 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.482 worst_q_ratio=1.251
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits sigma_overall=0.421 worst_q_ratio=1.267
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits sigma_overall=0.415 worst_q_ratio=1.218
reference average sigma_overall=0.4295 worst_q_ratio=1.243
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4714 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098_astrometric_residuals.png (4490 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099_astrometric_residuals.png (4489 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:12:04.06 +20:30:54.1: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:12:04.06 +20:30:54.1: 14.33 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:12:04.06 +20:30:54.1: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6408 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out14014.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30667_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 30667_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:01.12 +21:44:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30700_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 30700_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30748_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 30748_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:09.64 +19:28:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:04.06 +20:30:54.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.254 3414037725128113920 078.01657573337 +20.51488846733 12.6014 10.5593 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.254#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16428_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 16428_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:25.42 +19:25:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.49 +17:54:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:49.02 +20:10:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 20601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.10 +17:45:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.48 +20:22:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.39 +23:51:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 17s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.930 +22:00:03.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:19.930 +22:00:03.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0022 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.8' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:22.670 +21:59:24.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:22.670 +21:59:24.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0152 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:19.930 +22:00:03.70
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:22.670 +21:59:24.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01526 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3k0jl937qq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Yc3bdKeylL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kZ4b79dRAB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sUWjkpSIGa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 133 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3k0jl937qq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Yc3bdKeylL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4711 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4711 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=978 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kZ4b79dRAB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2834, bad_region=0, passed=57847
Got 57847 stars (including 54929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57847 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4775 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4776 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4718 stars left (next iteration limit 5189)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4718 robust_rms=7.707 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.858 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4718 robust_rms=0.513 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.604 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4718 robust_rms=0.414 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.500 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4718 robust_rms_before=0.415 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.445 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.414 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.513 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.500
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.513 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits N_match=4718 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.436 n_q1=1204 n_q2=824 n_q3=1110 n_q4=1580 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.sUWjkpSIGa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2940, bad_region=1, passed=58996
Got 58996 stars (including 55991 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58996 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4773 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4773 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4717 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4717 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4717 stars left (next iteration limit 5185)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4717 robust_rms=7.975 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.321 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4717 robust_rms=0.524 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.740 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4717 robust_rms=0.406 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.483 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4717 robust_rms_before=0.405 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.441 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.406 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.484 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.483
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.484 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=4717 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=1200 n_q2=850 n_q3=1095 n_q4=1572 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.289
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-13_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_021945_TTUQ1b1x1_3283283_fNahQNQJ/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:08:33.36 +26:27:01.4: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:38:32.89 +22:03:12.8: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:35:56.79 +25:28:06.1: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:34:42.28 +22:53:55.2: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:31:53.47 +19:51:32.7: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:07.26 +19:55:54.7: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:08:33.36 +26:27:01.4: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:31:53.47 +19:51:32.7: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:38:32.89 +22:03:12.8: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:33.36 +26:27:01.4: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6096 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:53.47 +19:51:32.7: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3972 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:32.89 +22:03:12.8: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5957 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:42.28 +22:53:55.2: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:05:14.57 +20:39:02.3: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:07.26 +19:55:54.7: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:35:56.79 +25:28:06.1: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:42.28 +22:53:55.2: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7873 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:56.79 +25:28:06.1: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3815 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:07.26 +19:55:54.7: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8942 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:07.92 +21:52:56.1: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:05:14.57 +20:39:02.3: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:14.57 +20:39:02.3: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0032 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:07.92 +21:52:56.1: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:07.92 +21:52:56.1: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2334 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:07:15.46 +25:16:10.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:07:15.46 +25:16:10.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:15.46 +25:16:10.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:31:40.09 +18:13:14.7: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:31:40.09 +18:13:14.7: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:40.09 +18:13:14.7: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5630 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:23.48 +26:25:54.6: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:23.48 +26:25:54.6: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:23.48 +26:25:54.6: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6306 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.61 +25:20:28.9: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:24:13.04 +20:07:34.3: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:24:13.04 +20:07:34.3: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:13.04 +20:07:34.3: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0012 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.61 +25:20:28.9: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.61 +25:20:28.9: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1725 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:41:46.86 +24:09:32.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:11:25.38 +24:24:27.5: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:41:46.86 +24:09:32.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:11:25.38 +24:24:27.5: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:25.38 +24:24:27.5: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3641 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:53.37 +21:56:16.1: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:07:52.31 +27:10:51.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:53.37 +21:56:16.1: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:43:53.37 +21:56:16.1: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9275 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:07:52.31 +27:10:51.2: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:52.31 +27:10:51.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:50:02.21 +22:57:58.9: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:47.39 +17:18:28.0: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:50:02.21 +22:57:58.9: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:02.21 +22:57:58.9: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9806 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:59.77 +22:34:33.8: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:15.71 +25:11:37.3: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:47.39 +17:18:28.0: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:59.77 +22:34:33.8: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:59.77 +22:34:33.8: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9776 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:15.71 +25:11:37.3: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:15.71 +25:11:37.3: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5131 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:04.06 +21:09:56.2: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:42.83 +19:58:14.9: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:16.98 +26:54:12.1: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:04.06 +21:09:56.2: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:04.06 +21:09:56.2: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6216 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:42.83 +19:58:14.9: 14.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:16.98 +26:54:12.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:42.83 +19:58:14.9: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6170 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:41:26.66 +23:00:13.6: 14.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:41:26.66 +23:00:13.6: 14.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:41:26.66 +23:00:13.6: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3023 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:54.50 +21:13:25.4: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:54.50 +21:13:25.4: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:42:54.50 +21:13:25.4: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3133 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:40:36.15 +23:13:20.8: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:40:36.15 +23:13:20.8: 14.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:40:36.15 +23:13:20.8: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4681 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:52.12 +24:29:56.0: 14.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:52.12 +24:29:56.0: 14.62 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:42:52.12 +24:29:56.0: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3080 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:40:51.29 +24:09:34.7: 14.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:40:51.29 +24:09:34.7: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:40:51.29 +24:09:34.7: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2905 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:39:38.30 +22:51:35.9: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:39:38.30 +22:51:35.9: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:39:38.30 +22:51:35.9: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8992 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191126.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191290.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191455.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out40163.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out45666.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out59567.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out62761.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65216.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 10s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190564_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190564_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190570_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190570_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190571_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190571_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:17.56 +20:39:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:43.79 +19:49:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190583_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190583_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:48.90 +24:13:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190585_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190585_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190588_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190588_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:16.59 +26:53:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190590_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190590_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:54.38 +18:25:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190593_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190593_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:20.61 +18:14:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:21.98 +23:00:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190603_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190603_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190623_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190623_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:29.68 +16:41:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190639_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 190639_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190651_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190651_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:58.91 +26:19:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190767_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190767_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.11 +22:38:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190796_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190796_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.84 +23:48:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190815_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190815_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.96 +26:25:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190825_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190825_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.68 +22:27:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190830_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190830_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.85 +25:55:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190862_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190862_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:41.73 +23:02:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190871_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190871_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190878_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190878_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:02.96 +23:18:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190893_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190893_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:01.77 +26:45:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190905_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190905_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:20.96 +23:48:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190907_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190907_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.73 +19:34:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190915_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190915_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.94 +25:05:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190935_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190935_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:09.92 +18:33:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190946_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190946_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.93 +26:10:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190953_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190953_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190965_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190965_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:20.42 +22:03:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190968_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190968_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.94 +20:10:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190980_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190980_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.25 +18:59:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190985_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190985_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:36.53 +22:27:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190988_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190988_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.14 +23:12:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190990_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 190990_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.67 +20:02:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191005_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191005_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:48.65 +25:09:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191007_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191007_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.76 +22:03:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191017_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191017_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:56.18 +24:36:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191029_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191029_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.69 +22:40:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191030_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191030_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:40.12 +20:26:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191033_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191033_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191037_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191037_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.28 +22:45:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191042_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191042_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:02.46 +18:29:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191052_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191052_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:52.87 +23:55:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191062_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191062_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:23.19 +25:24:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191066_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191066_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.36 +18:33:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191081_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191081_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191089_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191089_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:02.96 +18:33:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191096_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191096_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191104_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191104_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:33.97 +18:37:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191112_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191112_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:14.95 +19:35:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191114_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191114_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.67 +21:46:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191126_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 191126_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191155_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191155_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191156_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191156_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.32 +25:08:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191159_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191159_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.27 +25:47:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191164_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191164_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.40 +24:25:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191176_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191176_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:37.58 +22:22:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191195_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191195_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.22 +23:00:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191198_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191198_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.72 +19:32:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191201_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191201_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.26 +20:53:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191221_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191221_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.29 +23:07:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191227_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191227_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.56 +20:05:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191246_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191246_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191259_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191259_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:10.26 +19:41:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191265_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191265_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.56 +25:22:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191268_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191268_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191270_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191270_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.35 +20:56:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191286_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191286_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.22 +25:25:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191287_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191287_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:31.12 +26:59:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191288_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191288_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191290_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 191290_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:40.10 +22:58:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191333_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191333_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191343_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191343_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:21.77 +24:21:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:45.89 +17:11:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191386_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191386_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:56.86 +19:31:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:02.39 +24:22:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191439_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191439_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191442_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191442_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191455_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 191455_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191497_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191497_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:51.81 +23:51:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191510_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191510_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:34.66 +17:59:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191517_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191517_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:33.79 +21:19:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191530_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 191530_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.88 +23:13:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 34493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.70 +25:00:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 32970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:04.40 +25:01:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:30.71 +22:47:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 62761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.35 +25:40:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:50.52 +21:45:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52744_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 52744_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:00.85 +23:44:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147723_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 147723_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:00.71 +19:35:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:01.34 +20:16:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114749_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 114749_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:43.75 +20:01:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:18.06 +24:59:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.45 +26:13:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.83 +23:10:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93856_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 93856_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.14 +24:10:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67949_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 67949_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:46.81 +22:35:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:37.40 +20:19:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59567_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 59567_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.76 +19:21:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:56.57 +21:25:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99311_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 99311_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:53.27 +20:56:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157320_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 157320_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:47.19 +17:10:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40163_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 40163_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:36.15 +25:59:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.22 +20:22:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.44 +17:54:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45666_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 45666_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.49 +20:22:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.11 +17:45:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 65120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:25.88 +22:48:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:25.43 +19:25:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 61658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:20.92 +23:05:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.12 +21:51:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132740_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 132740_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:43.73 +18:42:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.40 +23:51:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:48.53 +19:44:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:15.53 +20:28:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18807_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 18807_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.61 +25:49:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65216_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 65216_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:49.01 +20:10:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 105095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:39.30 +20:41:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.42 +20:16:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-13_02-09-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
