This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.4083* 00 50 29.27 +02 29 50.9 7.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.9083,7.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.4083 7.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.4083* 00 50 19.24 +02 29 42.3 8.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.9083,8.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.4083 8.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.4083* 00 50 29.27 +02 29 50.9 7.7 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.9083,7.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.4083 7.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.4083* 00 50 19.24 +02 29 42.3 8.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.9083,8.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.4083 8.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.4083 2461295.9083 13.10 00:55:01.89 -00:55:45.8
124.96589 -63.78694 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.384 Burdigala 1 -0 1 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:55:01.89 -00:55:45.8: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:55:01.89 -00:55:45.8: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.4083* 00 55 01.89 +00 55 45.8 13.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.9083,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.4083 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.4083 2461295.9083 13.95 01:07:25.75 +01:18:39.6
131.27772 -61.30135 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1132 Hollandia -1 1 1 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:07:25.75 +01:18:39.6: 15.71 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:07:25.75 +01:18:39.6: 15.74 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.73 +/- 0.22
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.4083* 01 07 25.75 +01 18 39.6 13.9 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.9083,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.4083 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.4083 2461295.9083 14.12 01:15:13.53 -01:17:21.6
136.37351 -63.53857 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.805 Hormuthia 0 0 0 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:15:13.53 -01:17:21.6: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:15:13.53 -01:17:21.6: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.4083* 01 15 13.53 -01 17 21.6 14.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.9083,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.4083 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.4083 2461295.9083 14.35 00:52:42.34 -03:53:55.9
123.73358 -66.76864 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.4212 Sansyu-Asuke -1 -0 1 14.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:52:42.34 -03:53:55.9: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:52:42.34 -03:53:55.9: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.4083* 00 52 42.34 -03 53 55.9 14.3 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.9083,14.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.4083 14.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.4083 2461295.9083 14.55 00:46:06.87 -04:17:15.3
119.51625 -67.12402 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3133 Sendai 0 -1 1 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:46:06.87 -04:17:15.3: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:46:06.87 -04:17:15.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.4083* 00 46 06.87 -04 17 15.3 14.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.9083,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.4083 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.4083 2461295.9083 14.63 01:16:04.76 -03:23:59.6
137.93243 -65.55145 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.155 Scylla 1 -0 1 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:16:04.76 -03:23:59.6: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:16:04.76 -03:23:59.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.4083* 01 16 04.76 -03 23 59.6 14.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.9083,14.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.4083 14.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.4083 2461295.9083 14.49 00:36:07.44 +00:47:20.6
114.79897 -61.84063 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1735 ITA -0 0 0 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:36:07.44 +00:47:20.6: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:36:07.44 +00:47:20.6: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.4083* 00 36 07.44 +00 47 20.6 14.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.9083,14.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.4083 14.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.4083 2461295.9083 14.66 00:40:45.51 -06:43:17.6
115.36389 -69.43623 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.4299 WIYN -2 2 3 14.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:40:45.51 -06:43:17.6: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:40:45.51 -06:43:17.6: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.4083* 00 40 45.51 -06 43 17.6 14.7 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.9083,14.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.4083 14.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461295.90862345 12.09.2026 09:48:15.066 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5840
Objects passed selection criteria: 5837
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5509
Average stars matched: 5311.25 (96.4104 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232060 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 05:32:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461295.90862345 12.09.2026 09:48:15.066 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 67
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 507 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31453
Objects passed selection criteria: 31371
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 29999.2
Average stars matched: 28502 (95.009 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 253068 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 05:47:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461295.90805653
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:17.515 -02:01:28.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:17.515 -02:01:28.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0413 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:17.810 -02:02:09.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:17.810 -02:02:09.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0479 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:17.515 -02:01:28.73
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:17.810 -02:02:09.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01143 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NPrnyTNq9K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r08j0UhdxV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UBW2NAYp8l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T8TdcfWw0z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5517 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to +3.3142 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to 3.3142 deg
Loaded 3965 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3364 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3364 out of 5517 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.870150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.870150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5517 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to +3.3142 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to 3.3142 deg
Loaded 3965 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3364 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3364 out of 5517 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 5460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9695 to 20.8088 deg, Dec -7.2935 to +3.3227 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9695 to 20.8088 deg, Dec -7.2935 to 3.3227 deg
Loaded 3971 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3212 out of 3360 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3360 out of 5460 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.0 pix Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
15.3 mag. Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.NPrnyTNq9K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=396, bad_region=0, passed=5517
Got 5517 stars (including 5117 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5517 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5380)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.228 n_q1=1224 n_q2=1283 n_q3=1146 n_q4=1238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.r08j0UhdxV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=414, bad_region=0, passed=5460
Got 5460 stars (including 5034 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1199 n_q2=1300 n_q3=1145 n_q4=1246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.354
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.UBW2NAYp8l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=393, bad_region=0, passed=5586
Got 5586 stars (including 5184 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5586 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=11.805 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.351 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.429 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.482 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.282 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.338 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4892 robust_rms_before=1.018 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.279 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.282 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.343 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.338
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.343 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1259 n_q2=1215 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.T8TdcfWw0z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=406, bad_region=2, passed=5636
Got 5636 stars (including 5221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5636 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5636 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5636 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5636 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=11.916 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.573 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.457 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.517 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.278 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.332 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4897 robust_rms_before=1.017 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.274 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.278 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.324 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.332
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.324 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.252 n_q1=1264 n_q2=1205 n_q3=1205 n_q4=1223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.174
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits sigma_overall=0.260 worst_q_ratio=1.267
ref2=Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits sigma_overall=0.301 worst_q_ratio=1.354
new1=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits sigma_overall=0.286 worst_q_ratio=1.215
new2=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.174
reference average sigma_overall=0.2805 worst_q_ratio=1.3105
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061_astrometric_residuals.png (4891 matched stars from wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449_astrometric_residuals.png (4897 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:53:24.39 -01:50:29.0: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:54:08.38 -01:07:15.9: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:53:24.39 -01:50:29.0: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:54:08.38 -01:07:15.9: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:24.39 -01:50:29.0: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1148 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:54:08.38 -01:07:15.9: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2104 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20255_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 20255_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20259_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 20259_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20402_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20402_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20407_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20407_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20412_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20412_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:14:07.69 -02:06:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:17.515 -02:01:28.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:17.515 -02:01:28.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0413 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:17.810 -02:02:09.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:17.810 -02:02:09.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0479 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:17.515 -02:01:28.73
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:17.810 -02:02:09.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01143 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e7wBLTqjZr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CMbuobRKWl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qBANPlce3K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pX9fmSOKpJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29514 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to +3.3164 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to 3.3164 deg
Loaded 3973 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3194 out of 3433 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3433 out of 29514 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.781250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.781250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29514 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to +3.3164 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to 3.3164 deg
Loaded 3973 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3194 out of 3433 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3433 out of 29514 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 30077 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9695 to 20.8139 deg, Dec -7.2935 to +3.3255 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9695 to 20.8139 deg, Dec -7.2935 to 3.3255 deg
Loaded 3973 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3182 out of 3441 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3441 out of 30077 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 61 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
1.9 pix Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
15.4 mag. Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.e7wBLTqjZr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1068, bad_region=0, passed=29501
Got 29501 stars (including 28375 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29501 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.234 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.226 n_q1=1259 n_q2=1244 n_q3=1200 n_q4=1191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.247
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CMbuobRKWl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1115, bad_region=1, passed=30063
Got 30063 stars (including 28889 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30063 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=1263 n_q2=1242 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.324
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qBANPlce3K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1127, bad_region=26, passed=30696
Got 30696 stars (including 29482 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30696 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30696 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30696 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30696 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=11.307 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.585 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.483 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.279 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.334 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4889 robust_rms_before=1.013 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.274 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.279 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.336 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.334
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.336 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.251 n_q1=1288 n_q2=1239 n_q3=1174 n_q4=1188 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pX9fmSOKpJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1156, bad_region=30, passed=30582
Got 30582 stars (including 29344 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30582 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4887 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=11.280 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.503 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=0.454 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.511 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=0.275 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.324 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4887 robust_rms_before=1.017 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.268 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.275 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.318 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.324
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.318 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits N_match=4887 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.244 n_q1=1284 n_q2=1222 n_q3=1183 n_q4=1198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-47-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_044924_TTUQ1b1x1_3527394_fauYYNJC/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:28:27.24 +00:04:50.2: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:54:14.60 -07:03:14.1: 15.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:56:17.47 -02:24:51.4: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:27:58.29 -01:13:10.6: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:44:51.50 -03:24:19.7: 14.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:34:00.41 +00:50:40.9: 14.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:42:47.41 +03:04:22.8: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:00:32.30 +01:42:54.5: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:08:49.76 +01:34:04.7: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:27:58.29 -01:13:10.6: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:00:32.30 +01:42:54.5: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:54:14.60 -07:03:14.1: 14.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:56:17.47 -02:24:51.4: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:44:51.50 -03:24:19.7: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:42:47.41 +03:04:22.8: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:08:49.76 +01:34:04.7: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:34:00.41 +00:50:40.9: 14.80 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:58.29 -01:13:10.6: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2088 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:28:27.24 +00:04:50.2: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:00:32.30 +01:42:54.5: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5887 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:08:49.76 +01:34:04.7: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3463 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:54:14.60 -07:03:14.1: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6795 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:44:51.50 -03:24:19.7: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3408 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:56:17.47 -02:24:51.4: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5423 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:42:47.41 +03:04:22.8: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8546 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:34:00.41 +00:50:40.9: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8035 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:27.24 +00:04:50.2: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1828 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:40:07.95 -04:05:08.9: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:58:23.82 +02:35:13.0: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:28:29.73 -02:31:19.4: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:15:13.53 -01:17:21.6: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:07:25.75 +01:18:39.6: 15.71 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:45:04.69 +02:28:55.6: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:55:01.89 -00:55:45.8: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:40:07.95 -04:05:08.9: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:28:29.73 -02:31:19.4: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:58:23.82 +02:35:13.0: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:45:04.69 +02:28:55.6: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:15:13.53 -01:17:21.6: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:55:01.89 -00:55:45.8: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:29.73 -02:31:19.4: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6926 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:23.82 +02:35:13.0: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2470 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:40:07.95 -04:05:08.9: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7768 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:52:42.34 -03:53:55.9: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:07:25.75 +01:18:39.6: 15.74 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:45:04.69 +02:28:55.6: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9585 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.73 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:07:25.75 +01:18:39.6: ref_mag=15.73 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=13.9477 delta=1.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:52:42.34 -03:53:55.9: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:27:12.79 -06:32:53.0: 14.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:26:35.34 -02:47:27.5: 14.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:22:10.51 -05:57:57.2: 14.59 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:27:12.79 -06:32:53.0: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:22:10.51 -05:57:57.2: 14.28 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:26:35.34 -02:47:27.5: 14.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:22:00.61 -03:02:01.7: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:46:06.87 -04:17:15.3: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:35.34 -02:47:27.5: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4807 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:12.79 -06:32:53.0: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5314 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:10.51 -05:57:57.2: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3177 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:22:00.61 -03:02:01.7: 14.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:00.61 -03:02:01.7: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5612 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:46:06.87 -04:17:15.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:21:41.67 -04:29:24.2: 14.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:20:03.05 -06:00:31.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:13:56.50 +02:04:12.4: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:16:04.76 -03:23:59.6: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:36:07.44 +00:47:20.6: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:20:03.05 -06:00:31.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:21:41.67 -04:29:24.2: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:20:03.05 -06:00:31.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:13:56.50 +02:04:12.4: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:41.67 -04:29:24.2: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5948 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:13:56.50 +02:04:12.4: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6232 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:16:04.76 -03:23:59.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:36:07.44 +00:47:20.6: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:21:47.12 -01:48:42.2: 15.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:02:51.51 -01:33:23.3: 14.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:21:47.12 -01:48:42.2: 15.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:47.12 -01:48:42.2: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7364 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:02:51.51 -01:33:23.3: 14.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:02:51.51 -01:33:23.3: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7725 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:21:12.85 -04:34:02.4: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:21:12.85 -04:34:02.4: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:12.85 -04:34:02.4: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6006 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:13:44.71 +02:28:02.0: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:40:45.51 -06:43:17.6: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:13:44.71 +02:28:02.0: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:13:44.71 +02:28:02.0: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8049 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:40:45.51 -06:43:17.6: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:27:45.91 +01:00:27.5: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:27:45.91 +01:00:27.5: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:45.91 +01:00:27.5: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8141 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:18:02.65 -05:34:25.3: 15.38 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:18:02.65 -05:34:25.3: 15.27 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:02.65 -05:34:25.3: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.8256 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:25:36.78 -05:59:30.7: 14.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:25:36.78 -05:59:30.7: 14.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:24:14.52 -05:06:03.8: 15.16 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:36.78 -05:59:30.7: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7344 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:24:14.52 -05:06:03.8: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:14.52 -05:06:03.8: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7456 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:30:51.85 -05:28:37.8: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:21:20.81 -06:12:52.1: 14.84 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:30:51.85 -05:28:37.8: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:51.85 -05:28:37.8: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8511 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:21:20.81 -06:12:52.1: 15.12 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:20.81 -06:12:52.1: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7813 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:48:11.03 +01:23:27.2: 14.62 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:48:11.03 +01:23:27.2: 14.49 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:48:11.03 +01:23:27.2: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5712 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:30:00.64 +01:12:40.8: 15.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:26:58.83 -05:06:29.0: 15.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:25:22.04 -05:10:07.2: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:31:12.17 -00:24:25.4: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:36:12.57 -04:51:42.8: 15.29 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:38:18.23 -05:28:49.9: 15.26 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:30:00.64 +01:12:40.8: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:00.64 +01:12:40.8: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6473 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:22:38.62 -02:18:02.3: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:23:46.36 -00:23:43.5: 14.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:35:39.65 -03:00:24.9: 15.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:34:07.58 +02:18:25.7: 15.15 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:26:58.83 -05:06:29.0: 15.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:25:22.04 -05:10:07.2: 15.11 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:58.83 -05:06:29.0: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8368 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:22.04 -05:10:07.2: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7377 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:36:12.57 -04:51:42.8: 15.16 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:38:18.23 -05:28:49.9: 15.28 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:31:12.17 -00:24:25.4: 14.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:36:12.57 -04:51:42.8: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8330 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:38:18.23 -05:28:49.9: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8623 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:12.17 -00:24:25.4: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7612 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:23:46.36 -00:23:43.5: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:22:38.62 -02:18:02.3: 15.30 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:46.36 -00:23:43.5: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7031 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:38.62 -02:18:02.3: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6650 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:34:07.58 +02:18:25.7: 15.17 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:34:07.58 +02:18:25.7: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8285 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:35:39.65 -03:00:24.9: 14.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:35:39.65 -03:00:24.9: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8001 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:23:50.25 -01:11:41.5: 15.33 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:23:05.79 -06:15:11.9: 15.08 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:34:20.41 +01:40:24.1: 14.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:27:57.43 -04:40:49.9: 14.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:28:58.57 -00:56:33.1: 15.31 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:23:50.25 -01:11:41.5: 15.41 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:23:05.79 -06:15:11.9: 15.16 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:34:20.41 +01:40:24.1: 15.01 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:27:57.43 -04:40:49.9: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:28:58.57 -00:56:33.1: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:50.25 -01:11:41.5: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.8595 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:34:20.41 +01:40:24.1: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7633 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:05.79 -06:15:11.9: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7159 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:58.57 -00:56:33.1: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8131 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:57.43 -04:40:49.9: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7457 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32603.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32848.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32919.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33030.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33143.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33195.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33209.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33256.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 31s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 10s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32279_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 32279_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32286_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 32286_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32288_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 32288_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32289_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 32289_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32293_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 32293_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32294_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 32294_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32297_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 32297_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32299_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 32299_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32300_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 32300_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32304_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 32304_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32308_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 32308_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32523_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 32523_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32549_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 32549_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32603_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 32603_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32604_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 32604_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:06:10.53 +01:57:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32649_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 32649_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32848_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 32848_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32851_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 32851_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32919_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 32919_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33030_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 33030_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33081_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33081_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:39:34.87 +00:51:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33106_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33106_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33107_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33107_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33112_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33112_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33123_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33123_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33143_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 33143_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33166_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33166_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33173_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33173_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33185_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33185_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33195_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 33195_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33209_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 33209_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33211_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33211_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:27:58.57 +02:30:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33224_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33224_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33236_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33236_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33242_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33242_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33246_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33246_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33256_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 33256_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33263_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33263_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33271_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33271_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33275_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33275_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33276_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33276_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33286_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33286_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33288_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33288_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33290_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33290_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33291_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33291_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33292_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33292_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33293_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33293_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33295_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33295_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33307_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33307_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33314_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33314_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33315_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33315_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33319_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33319_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33324_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33324_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33325_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33325_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33330_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33330_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33331_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33331_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33343_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33343_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33347_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33347_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33348_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33348_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33362_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 33362_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03888_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 03888_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-48-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
