This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3938 2461295.8938 13.52 04:01:21.64 +17:51:02.6
174.02906 -25.64255 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato -0 -0 0 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:01:21.64 +17:51:02.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:01:21.64 +17:51:02.6: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.3938* 04 01 21.64 +17 51 02.6 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8938,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3938 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3938 2461295.8938 14.54 03:57:34.56 +14:46:03.6
175.86321 -28.41042 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.742 Edisona 0 -0 0 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:34.56 +14:46:03.6: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:34.56 +14:46:03.6: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.3938* 03 57 34.56 +14 46 03.6 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8938,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3938 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3938 2461295.8938 14.73 04:16:29.59 +17:36:31.8
176.88059 -23.13260 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX15" ZTF J041629.79+173646.8
Type: EW
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
19.660 r Y 0.434 r 2458435.81950 0.341135400000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.1171 Rusthawelia -1 -0 1 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:16:29.59 +17:36:31.8: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:16:29.59 +17:36:31.8: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.3938* 04 16 29.59 +17 36 31.8 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J041629.79+173646.8,2461295.8938,14.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J041629.79+173646.8 20260912.3938 14.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3938 2461295.8938 14.83 03:54:42.15 +12:07:50.8
177.55956 -30.70487 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.655 Briseis -0 2 2 14.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:54:42.15 +12:07:50.8: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:54:42.15 +12:07:50.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.3938* 03 54 42.15 +12 07 50.8 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8938,14.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3938 14.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3938 2461295.8938 15.00 04:10:56.30 +12:24:13.9
180.30043 -27.53072 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1115 Sabauda -0 1 1 15.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:10:56.30 +12:24:13.9: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:10:56.30 +12:24:13.9: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.3938* 04 10 56.30 +12 24 13.9 15.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8938,15.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3938 15.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461295.89408297 12.09.2026 09:27:18.769 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9240
Objects passed selection criteria: 9235
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8768.5
Average stars matched: 8572.25 (97.7619 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236304 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 04:34:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461295.89408297 12.09.2026 09:27:18.769 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 71
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 37 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 58227
Objects passed selection criteria: 58104
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 54024.5
Average stars matched: 52522.2 (97.2193 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 277260 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 04:37:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461295.89351794
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:40.899 +14:00:03.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:40.899 +14:00:03.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0045 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:43.630 +14:00:23.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:43.630 +14:00:23.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0168 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:40.899 +14:00:03.10
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:43.630 +14:00:23.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01243 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kOiDfydfV9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JASPkLoFgl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DWoxn4QTrc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BPwOQwAyWF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.989100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.989100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec +8.6216 to +19.2870 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec 8.6216 to 19.2870 deg
Loaded 4407 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3650 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3650 out of 8488 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.kOiDfydfV9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=728, bad_region=0, passed=9344
Got 9344 stars (including 8597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1309 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1429 n_q4=1041 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JASPkLoFgl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=679, bad_region=1, passed=8488
Got 8488 stars (including 7793 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=1282 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1405 n_q4=1054 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.472
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DWoxn4QTrc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=504, bad_region=0, passed=8756
Got 8756 stars (including 8232 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8756 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=12.051 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.234 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.366 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.379 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.250 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.297 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4878 robust_rms_before=1.246 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.273 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.250 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.323 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.297
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.323 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=1063 n_q2=1363 n_q3=1155 n_q4=1297 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.BPwOQwAyWF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=511, bad_region=0, passed=8758
Got 8758 stars (including 8232 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8758 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=12.016 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.157 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.391 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.409 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.276 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.324 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4879 robust_rms_before=1.288 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.287 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.276 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.331 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.324
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.331 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits N_match=4879 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=1066 n_q2=1363 n_q3=1153 n_q4=1297 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.158
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.263
ref2=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.472
new1=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits sigma_overall=0.280 worst_q_ratio=1.159
new2=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.158
reference average sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.3675
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (4881 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426_astrometric_residuals.png (4878 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427_astrometric_residuals.png (4879 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:31.08 +15:35:14.7: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:22:15.75 +14:20:51.9: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:57.83 +15:19:04.8: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:33:50.13 +13:06:46.1: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:33:50.13 +13:06:46.1: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:57.83 +15:19:04.8: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:31.08 +15:35:14.7: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:22:15.75 +14:20:51.9: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:31.08 +15:35:14.7: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2150 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:57.83 +15:19:04.8: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4123 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:50.13 +13:06:46.1: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4782 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:15.75 +14:20:51.9: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4907 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20381_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20381_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20424_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20424_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20433_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20433_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20441_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20441_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.70 +09:56:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:27.21 +16:33:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01595_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 01595_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.25 +17:32:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:40.899 +14:00:03.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:40.899 +14:00:03.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0045 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:43.630 +14:00:23.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:43.630 +14:00:23.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0168 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:40.899 +14:00:03.10
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:43.630 +14:00:23.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01243 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cew0eil6TX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K24iYKytNt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q3Dx9A6VEj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lrI9LXH0hy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.852800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.852800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 58309 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec +8.6064 to +19.2869 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec 8.6064 to 19.2869 deg
Loaded 4433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3131 out of 3673 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3673 out of 58309 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 61 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
1.8 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.cew0eil6TX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3506, bad_region=5, passed=62251
Got 62251 stars (including 58597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62251 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1302 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1432 n_q4=1060 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.K24iYKytNt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3080, bad_region=5, passed=58299
Got 58299 stars (including 55093 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58299 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.235 n_q1=1266 n_q2=1129 n_q3=1416 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.486
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Q3Dx9A6VEj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2163, bad_region=23, passed=48260
Got 48260 stars (including 46013 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=12.949 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.511 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.369 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.382 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.250 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.300 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=1.236 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.270 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.250 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.322 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.300
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.322 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.231 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1078 n_q2=1366 n_q3=1142 n_q4=1290 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lrI9LXH0hy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2197, bad_region=27, passed=48928
Got 48928 stars (including 46613 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=13.117 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.536 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.398 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.415 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.276 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.321 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=1.274 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.283 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.276 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.309 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.321
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.309 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1089 n_q2=1357 n_q3=1143 n_q4=1284 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-26-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_042759_TTUQ1b1x1_4009412_Pv3QxFsP/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:37.93 +13:31:18.5: 14.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:21:44.38 +14:54:08.9: 15.44 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:38.73 +11:19:32.0: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:33.48 +17:38:00.7: 14.57 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:11.04 +10:38:42.3: 14.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:20:39.23 +14:38:38.5: 15.01 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:26.02 +09:56:13.5: 14.59 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:17:30.98 +10:25:55.5: 13.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:07:50.44 +15:06:01.9: 14.99 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:17:30.98 +10:25:55.5: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:21:44.38 +14:54:08.9: 15.11 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:07:50.44 +15:06:01.9: 14.99 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:30.98 +10:25:55.5: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0388 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:44.38 +14:54:08.9: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1787 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:38.73 +11:19:32.0: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:33.48 +17:38:00.7: 14.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:50.44 +15:06:01.9: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9700 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:11.04 +10:38:42.3: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:20:39.23 +14:38:38.5: 14.95 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:38.73 +11:19:32.0: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8238 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:33.48 +17:38:00.7: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5828 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:37.93 +13:31:18.5: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:26.02 +09:56:13.5: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:11.04 +10:38:42.3: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3371 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:39.23 +14:38:38.5: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8755 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:37.93 +13:31:18.5: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3195 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:26.02 +09:56:13.5: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5466 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:51:49.03 +13:37:44.1: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:01:21.64 +17:51:02.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:22.90 +16:16:05.2: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:54:51.27 +09:21:41.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:25:38.48 +17:55:22.4: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:35.51 +17:25:28.9: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:28.38 +18:01:08.2: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:49:50.18 +13:42:26.5: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:51:49.03 +13:37:44.1: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:01:21.64 +17:51:02.6: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:49.03 +13:37:44.1: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8390 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:16:14.26 +17:41:35.0: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:25:38.48 +17:55:22.4: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:35.51 +17:25:28.9: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:38.48 +17:55:22.4: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9586 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:54:51.27 +09:21:41.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:22.90 +16:16:05.2: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:51.27 +09:21:41.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:48:30.72 +10:58:58.6: 14.01 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:35.51 +17:25:28.9: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5541 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:28.38 +18:01:08.2: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:22.90 +16:16:05.2: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8884 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:28.38 +18:01:08.2: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1188 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:49:50.18 +13:42:26.5: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:50.18 +13:42:26.5: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9009 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:16:14.26 +17:41:35.0: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:14.26 +17:41:35.0: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2248 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:48:30.72 +10:58:58.6: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:30.72 +10:58:58.6: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0602 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:01:08.87 +12:05:44.2: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:49.60 +10:32:25.5: 15.06 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:14:02.36 +14:30:05.2: 14.36 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:34.56 +14:46:03.6: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:54:19.59 +13:38:05.2: 14.67 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:01:08.87 +12:05:44.2: 14.56 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:31:17.82 +17:39:39.1: 14.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:16:29.59 +17:36:31.8: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:03.62 +18:46:29.1: 15.22 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:08.87 +12:05:44.2: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4525 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:49.60 +10:32:25.5: 15.05 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:14:02.36 +14:30:05.2: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:23:37.95 +17:02:40.9: 14.68 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:02.36 +14:30:05.2: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5165 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:49.60 +10:32:25.5: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6073 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:34.56 +14:46:03.6: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:54:19.59 +13:38:05.2: 14.82 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:19.59 +13:38:05.2: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5173 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:31:17.82 +17:39:39.1: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:03.62 +18:46:29.1: 15.15 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:16:29.59 +17:36:31.8: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:17.82 +17:39:39.1: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.7508 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:03.62 +18:46:29.1: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8690 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:23:37.95 +17:02:40.9: 14.65 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:37.95 +17:02:40.9: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7807 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:55:36.62 +16:08:16.6: 15.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:04:01.28 +13:20:43.6: 15.01 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:40:59.21 +18:07:05.9: 14.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:18.85 +13:17:58.3: 15.07 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:00:44.59 +11:36:43.3: 15.25 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:28.98 +15:42:25.5: 15.06 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:12:11.39 +09:54:22.2: 15.20 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:04:01.28 +13:20:43.6: 15.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:40:59.21 +18:07:05.9: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:18.85 +13:17:58.3: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:01.28 +13:20:43.6: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8689 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:55:36.62 +16:08:16.6: 15.34 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:59.21 +18:07:05.9: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5433 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:18.85 +13:17:58.3: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9541 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:36.62 +16:08:16.6: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9632 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:00:44.59 +11:36:43.3: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:44.59 +11:36:43.3: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8174 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:28.98 +15:42:25.5: 15.23 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:12:11.39 +09:54:22.2: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:28.98 +15:42:25.5: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9490 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:11.39 +09:54:22.2: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8502 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:43.40 +16:22:07.1: 15.51 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:47.74 +11:43:33.1: 15.07 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:54:42.15 +12:07:50.8: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:59:54.37 +18:22:20.1: 15.50 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:26.90 +12:45:31.6: 15.36 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:43.40 +16:22:07.1: 14.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:01:33.31 +15:32:12.2: 15.38 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:43.40 +16:22:07.1: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9093 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:10:56.30 +12:24:13.9: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:54:42.15 +12:07:50.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:47.74 +11:43:33.1: 15.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:47.74 +11:43:33.1: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9173 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:59:54.37 +18:22:20.1: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:54.37 +18:22:20.1: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9904 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:26.90 +12:45:31.6: 15.48 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:01:33.31 +15:32:12.2: 15.06 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:26.90 +12:45:31.6: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1042 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:33.31 +15:32:12.2: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0068 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:10:56.30 +12:24:13.9: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:14:05.19 +16:42:34.4: 15.52 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:05:24.21 +13:15:12.7: 15.73 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:58.40 +13:58:44.0: 15.35 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:01:42.27 +14:07:23.3: 15.37 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:04:39.65 +17:01:32.8: 15.44 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:14:05.19 +16:42:34.4: 15.32 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:05.19 +16:42:34.4: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1247 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:05:24.21 +13:15:12.7: 15.19 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:58.40 +13:58:44.0: 15.42 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:24.21 +13:15:12.7: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1441 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:58.40 +13:58:44.0: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0832 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:01:42.27 +14:07:23.3: 15.36 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:04:39.65 +17:01:32.8: 15.23 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:42.27 +14:07:23.3: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0569 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:39.65 +17:01:32.8: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0996 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:52:01.52 +12:53:06.0: 15.28 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:12:34.13 +15:46:18.1: 15.82 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:41.62 +09:59:33.8: 15.30 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:04:44.77 +12:05:38.5: 15.27 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:52:01.52 +12:53:06.0: 14.90 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:01.52 +12:53:06.0: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7846 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:12:34.13 +15:46:18.1: 15.73 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.78 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:34.13 +15:46:18.1: ref_mag=15.78 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=15.1933 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:41.62 +09:59:33.8: 15.57 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:41.62 +09:59:33.8: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8043 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:04:44.77 +12:05:38.5: 15.47 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:44.77 +12:05:38.5: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0439 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76170.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76852.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76934.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77106.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77148.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75630_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75630_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75635_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75635_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75637_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75637_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75641_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75641_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75643_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75643_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75650_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75650_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75654_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75654_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75658_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75658_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75663_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75663_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75987_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75987_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:47.86 +18:26:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76132_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76132_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:42.04 +10:53:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76149_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76149_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:59.61 +14:06:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76170_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 76170_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76260_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76260_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76394_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76394_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76448_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76448_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76478_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76478_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76488_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76488_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76503_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76503_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76537_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76537_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76574_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76574_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:34.27 +17:20:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76630_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76630_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76683_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76683_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76744_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76744_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76750_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76750_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:07.80 +10:16:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76796_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76796_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:58.34 +10:13:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76813_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76813_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76822_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76822_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76852_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 76852_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76895_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76895_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76934_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 76934_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76939_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76939_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76974_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76974_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76980_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76980_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76985_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76985_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77007_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77007_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77010_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77010_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77040_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77040_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77047_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77047_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77052_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77052_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77065_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77065_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77082_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77082_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77106_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 77106_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77128_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77128_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77130_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77130_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77139_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77139_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77148_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 77148_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77184_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77184_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77189_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77189_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77190_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77190_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77191_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77191_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77211_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77211_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77214_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77214_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77240_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77240_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77251_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77251_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77254_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77254_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77265_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77265_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06604_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 06604_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:40.01 +18:13:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.70 +09:56:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:18.48 +11:10:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_04-27-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
