This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3651 2461295.8651 11.81 07:08:06.29 +30:52:34.2
186.35150 16.82832 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.115 Thyra 0 -0 0 12.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:08:06.29 +30:52:34.2: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:08:06.29 +30:52:34.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8651,11.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3651 11.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3651 2461295.8651 11.89 07:31:38.80 +31:38:31.3
187.47074 21.80593 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia -0 1 1 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:31:38.80 +31:38:31.3: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:31:38.80 +31:38:31.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8651,11.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3651 11.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3651 2461295.8651 12.07 06:30:07.72 +25:26:14.2
187.86816 6.96337 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope -0 0 0 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:30:07.72 +25:26:14.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:30:07.72 +25:26:14.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8651,12.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3651 12.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3651 2461295.8651 12.54 07:18:27.01 +32:37:59.9
185.46254 19.51340 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina 0 -0 0 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:18:27.01 +32:37:59.9: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:18:27.01 +32:37:59.9: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8651,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3651 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3651 2461295.8651 13.40 06:43:48.36 +32:22:55.6
182.82174 12.66113 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.702 Alauda 0 0 0 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:43:48.36 +32:22:55.6: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:43:48.36 +32:22:55.6: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8651,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3651 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3651 2461295.8651 13.16 07:31:20.96 +29:54:11.3
189.20784 21.16165 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.141 Lumen -1 -0 1 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:31:20.96 +29:54:11.3: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:31:20.96 +29:54:11.3: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8651,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3651 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3651 2461295.8651 13.85 06:27:53.22 +32:49:58.1
180.95341 9.81798 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.172 Baucis -0 -1 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:27:53.22 +32:49:58.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:27:53.22 +32:49:58.1: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8651,13.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3651 13.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3651 2461295.8651 13.92 07:00:47.51 +30:36:40.5
185.98353 15.27458 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.152 Atala 0 -1 1 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:00:47.51 +30:36:40.5: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:00:47.51 +30:36:40.5: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8651,13.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3651 13.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461295.86551027 12.09.2026 08:46:10.087 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 46 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 23229
Objects passed selection criteria: 23174
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 19205.5
Average stars matched: 18668.2 (97.2026 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 247240 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 04:01:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461295.86551027 12.09.2026 08:46:10.087 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 146
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 118 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 155697
Objects passed selection criteria: 155367
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 125921
Average stars matched: 121232 (96.2762 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 551868 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 04:06:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461295.86478712
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Image size: 942.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:50.116 +30:00:17.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 06:59:50.116 +30:00:17.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0381 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:47.737 +30:00:17.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 06:59:47.737 +30:00:17.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0465 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:59:50.116 +30:00:17.37
Second-epoch second image center 06:59:47.737 +30:00:17.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00859 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FakNzxnEtI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mFyUBIxnXf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FvUGnJQ7BT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits &> /tmp/tmp.isHcey9OoR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11975 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.910000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.910000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11975 out of 24243 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec +24.1920 to +35.3691 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec 24.1920 to 35.3691 deg
Loaded 15195 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10824 out of 11955 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11955 out of 24037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.8 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
2.8 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.FakNzxnEtI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, bad_region=0, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 21925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5256)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=1413 n_q2=1099 n_q3=1188 n_q4=1079 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.mFyUBIxnXf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, bad_region=0, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 21723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1411 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1181 n_q4=1087 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FvUGnJQ7BT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=769, bad_region=0, passed=14432
Got 14432 stars (including 13648 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14432 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013096 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010477 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4774 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4770 stars left (next iteration limit 5245)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=7.705 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.860 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=0.420 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.441 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=0.306 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.377 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4770 robust_rms_before=0.956 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.307 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.306 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.360 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.377
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.360 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits N_match=4770 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1587 n_q2=881 n_q3=1379 n_q4=923 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.124
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.isHcey9OoR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=797, bad_region=0, passed=14613
Got 14613 stars (including 13805 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14613 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4772 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14613 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14613 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14613 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4768 stars left (next iteration limit 5245)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=7.824 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.334 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=0.416 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.476 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=0.302 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.378 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4768 robust_rms_before=0.902 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.310 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.302 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.361 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.378
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.361 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits N_match=4768 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1589 n_q2=885 n_q3=1361 n_q4=933 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.284
ref2=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.238
new1=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits sigma_overall=0.299 worst_q_ratio=1.124
new2=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits sigma_overall=0.302 worst_q_ratio=1.097
reference average sigma_overall=0.3745 worst_q_ratio=1.261
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226_astrometric_residuals.png (4779 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227_astrometric_residuals.png (4781 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_astrometric_residuals.png (4770 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389_astrometric_residuals.png (4768 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:31:38.80 +31:38:31.3: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:08:06.29 +30:52:34.2: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:08:06.29 +30:52:34.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:31:38.80 +31:38:31.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31986.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32055.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31429_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 31429_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:04.59 +25:21:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31688_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 31688_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.60 +31:35:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31693_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 31693_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:51.63 +31:52:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31788_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 31788_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:42.44 +33:55:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31986_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 31986_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32055_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 32055_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16419_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 16419_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:33.85 +31:38:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.26 +27:57:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.35 +33:22:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.01 +25:59:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.13 +30:16:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 14s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:08:06.29 +30:52:34.2
07:31:38.80 +31:38:31.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Image size: 942.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:50.116 +30:00:17.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 06:59:50.116 +30:00:17.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0381 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:47.737 +30:00:17.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 06:59:47.737 +30:00:17.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0465 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:59:50.116 +30:00:17.37
Second-epoch second image center 06:59:47.737 +30:00:17.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00859 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BUvenHypMn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IKJw6nJWgE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Gilt4bH9H8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MZf0zUDGw5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.776200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.776200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 166985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3760 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3760 deg
Loaded 15290 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8659 out of 12225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12225 out of 166985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 140 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.BUvenHypMn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=20873, bad_region=1, passed=167489
Got 167489 stars (including 146337 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4800 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4801 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4765 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4765 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1316 n_q2=1150 n_q3=1167 n_q4=1132 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.IKJw6nJWgE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20907, bad_region=3, passed=166934
Got 166934 stars (including 145737 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166934 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4797 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4764 stars left (next iteration limit 5241)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4764 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1335 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1157 n_q4=1131 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.301
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Gilt4bH9H8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=5929, bad_region=13, passed=85625
Got 85625 stars (including 79576 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85625 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013096 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010477 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85625 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85625 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85625 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4767 stars left (next iteration limit 5240)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=7.655 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=18.939 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.421 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.433 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.308 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.375 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4767 robust_rms_before=0.954 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.291 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.308 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.341 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.375
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.341 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits N_match=4767 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1596 n_q2=870 n_q3=1353 n_q4=948 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MZf0zUDGw5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=5943, bad_region=17, passed=86530
Got 86530 stars (including 80462 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86530 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4765 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4765 robust_rms=7.827 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=18.360 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4765 robust_rms=0.409 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.459 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4765 robust_rms=0.301 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.364 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4765 robust_rms_before=0.902 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.307 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.301 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.354 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.364
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.354 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits N_match=4765 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1596 n_q2=865 n_q3=1343 n_q4=961 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-45-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_034652_TTUQ1b1x1_2602551_1fDrtq9l/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:07:49.05 +26:53:33.8: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:40:24.73 +30:55:32.3: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:44:53.91 +31:46:51.4: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:07:49.05 +26:53:33.8: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:49.05 +26:53:33.8: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9000 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:44:53.91 +31:46:51.4: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:53.91 +31:46:51.4: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3719 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:40:24.73 +30:55:32.3: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:40:24.73 +30:55:32.3: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7154 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:30:07.72 +25:26:14.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:30:07.72 +25:26:14.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:18:27.01 +32:37:59.9: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:18:27.01 +32:37:59.9: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:43:48.36 +32:22:55.6: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:43:48.36 +32:22:55.6: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:27:15.82 +29:21:39.2: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:25:07.49 +27:05:54.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:27:15.82 +29:21:39.2: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:15.82 +29:21:39.2: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6137 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:25:07.49 +27:05:54.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:07.49 +27:05:54.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:31:20.96 +29:54:11.3: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:37:45.06 +28:25:47.7: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:31:20.96 +29:54:11.3: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:27:53.22 +32:49:58.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:37:45.06 +28:25:47.7: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:45.06 +28:25:47.7: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5659 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:27:53.22 +32:49:58.1: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:45:05.55 +30:05:46.8: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:45:05.55 +30:05:46.8: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:05.55 +30:05:46.8: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8530 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:00:47.51 +30:36:40.5: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:00:47.51 +30:36:40.5: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:36:05.10 +27:46:06.8: 9.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:36:05.10 +27:46:06.8: 9.66 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.67 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:05.10 +27:46:06.8: ref_mag=9.67 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7399 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192542.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193192.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193871.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194522.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194665.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195117.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191896_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 191896_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191902_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 191902_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191906_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 191906_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:29.26 +32:45:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191909_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 191909_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:05.88 +31:03:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191923_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 191923_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191925_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 191925_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:06.91 +32:40:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191930_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 191930_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191933_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 191933_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:33.33 +27:22:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191936_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 191936_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:06.72 +32:24:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191937_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 191937_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:18.04 +34:18:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191938_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 191938_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.91 +31:14:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191942_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 191942_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:53.03 +30:58:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191945_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 191945_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:27.21 +33:36:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191946_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 191946_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:34.25 +28:05:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191948_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 191948_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:28.01 +31:40:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191953_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 191953_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:43.96 +29:29:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191954_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 191954_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:04.45 +26:33:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191999_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 191999_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:04.65 +25:21:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192071_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 192071_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:20.64 +24:47:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192542_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 192542_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192566_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 192566_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:06.29 +30:52:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192720_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 192720_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:38.80 +31:38:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192753_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 192753_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192758_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 192758_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:54.57 +27:49:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192805_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 192805_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:34.11 +28:18:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192835_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 192835_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:39.22 +27:38:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192878_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 192878_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:52.07 +29:43:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192896_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 192896_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192918_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 192918_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:17.74 +27:48:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192978_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 192978_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:51.06 +32:48:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192998_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 192998_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.51 +32:29:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193009_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193009_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:05.35 +34:09:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193029_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193029_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:00.52 +29:47:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193123_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193123_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:15.55 +27:12:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193192_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 193192_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193209_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193209_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:22.73 +25:23:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193215_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193215_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:04.91 +27:12:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193276_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193276_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.25 +26:03:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193425_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193425_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:47.15 +27:58:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193474_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193474_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:49.33 +32:38:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193498_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193498_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:47.82 +25:27:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193564_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193564_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:49.61 +33:53:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193601_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193601_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:25.21 +27:14:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193630_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193630_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:08.27 +33:08:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193719_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193719_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:57.02 +30:18:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193789_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193789_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:13.24 +26:25:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193791_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193791_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:31.33 +30:38:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193871_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 193871_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193883_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193883_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.58 +30:33:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193901_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193901_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:40.65 +31:22:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193921_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193921_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:22.80 +33:20:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193924_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193924_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:35.11 +31:07:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193956_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193956_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:36.68 +30:31:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193972_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 193972_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:13.62 +28:32:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194011_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194011_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:17.89 +25:23:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194017_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194017_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.18 +32:21:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194047_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194047_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194076_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194076_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:01.24 +26:03:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194128_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194128_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:30.81 +32:10:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194155_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194155_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:59.47 +33:13:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194176_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194176_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.71 +25:33:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194182_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194182_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194184_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194184_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:06.96 +25:18:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194202_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194202_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:02.84 +29:43:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194212_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194212_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:15.98 +30:26:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194231_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194231_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:09.24 +27:46:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194236_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194236_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:18.58 +30:22:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194239_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194239_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:20.91 +30:56:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194246_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194246_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:47.34 +34:48:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194260_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194260_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:05.27 +29:15:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194295_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194295_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:49.00 +25:18:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194332_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194332_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:26.83 +27:58:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194335_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194335_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:13.77 +30:24:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194347_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194347_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:03.14 +27:02:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194365_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194365_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:56.03 +27:08:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194401_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194401_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:02.79 +25:10:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194419_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194419_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:46.59 +26:19:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194420_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194420_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:47.09 +34:14:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194421_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194421_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:04.72 +27:25:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194424_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194424_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:48.78 +34:16:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194434_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194434_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:22.73 +31:00:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194481_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194481_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:08.94 +34:08:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194485_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194485_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:19.50 +27:57:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194509_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194509_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:57.30 +32:46:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194522_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 194522_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194547_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194547_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:11.79 +26:58:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194552_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194552_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:18.63 +32:26:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194574_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194574_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194592_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194592_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:26.84 +33:15:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194665_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 194665_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194691_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194691_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:34.74 +32:22:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194709_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194709_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:39.26 +26:48:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194711_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194711_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:13.73 +25:34:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194731_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194731_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:41.04 +32:38:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194741_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194741_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.42 +28:12:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194757_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194757_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:14.28 +32:50:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194764_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194764_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194782_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194782_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:53.54 +26:47:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194792_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194792_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:12.95 +30:35:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194823_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194823_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:20.36 +34:50:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194874_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194874_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194892_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194892_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:51.83 +27:10:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194933_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194933_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:18.93 +29:12:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194991_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 194991_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.24 +26:04:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195010_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 195010_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.68 +26:19:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195016_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 195016_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:06.14 +33:41:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195035_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 195035_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:35.92 +31:15:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195059_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 195059_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:53.35 +28:54:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195107_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 195107_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:15.35 +33:42:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195110_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 195110_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:08.81 +30:20:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195117_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 195117_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195180_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 195180_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:17.02 +33:23:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195222_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 195222_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:58.46 +34:29:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195300_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 195300_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195362_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 195362_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:56.83 +27:21:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195437_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 195437_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:31.89 +28:17:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195471_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 195471_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:38.59 +29:59:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195501_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 195501_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:44.06 +31:28:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195559_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 195559_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195719_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 195719_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:25.18 +30:58:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75053_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 75053_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:16.32 +29:01:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188702_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 188702_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:18.58 +28:38:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130975_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 130975_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:20.06 +32:56:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80230_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 80230_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:14.17 +29:06:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103405_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 103405_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58256_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 58256_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.64 +31:35:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.37 +26:47:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25119_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 25119_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:48.67 +25:58:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59889_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 59889_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:54.61 +27:45:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:20.77 +27:15:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109209_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 109209_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:01.49 +31:01:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.35 +33:22:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.01 +25:59:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.12 +30:16:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.25 +27:57:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116360_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 116360_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:33.85 +31:38:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84162_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 84162_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:55.01 +29:40:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83613_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 83613_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:40.81 +29:42:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137584_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 137584_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
