This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3638 2461295.8638 13.64 03:35:13.00 +35:06:58.4
156.96673 -16.71371 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.762 Pulcova -0 -0 0 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:35:13.00 +35:06:58.4: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:35:13.00 +35:06:58.4: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.3638* 03 35 13.00 +35 06 58.4 13.6 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8638,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3638 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3638 2461295.8638 13.85 04:30:24.54 +27:27:46.9
171.30050 -14.21497 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana 1 -1 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:30:24.54 +27:27:46.9: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:30:24.54 +27:27:46.9: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.3638* 04 30 24.54 +27 27 46.9 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8638,13.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3638 13.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3638 2461295.8638 14.25 04:20:53.79 +24:40:23.4
171.97796 -17.66763 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia -1 -1 1 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:20:53.79 +24:40:23.4: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:20:53.79 +24:40:23.4: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.3638* 04 20 53.79 +24 40 23.4 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8638,14.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3638 14.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3638 2461295.8638 14.56 03:32:52.15 +33:15:07.3
157.75215 -18.48866 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.683 Lanzia -0 -0 0 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:32:52.15 +33:15:07.3: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:32:52.15 +33:15:07.3: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.3638* 03 32 52.15 +33 15 07.3 14.6 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8638,14.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3638 14.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3638 2461295.8638 14.38 04:33:06.68 +32:20:53.0
167.96111 -10.53111 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.573 Recha 0 -0 1 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:33:06.68 +32:20:53.0: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:33:06.68 +32:20:53.0: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.3638* 04 33 06.68 +32 20 53.0 14.4 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8638,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3638 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3638 2461295.8638 14.72 03:38:59.53 +26:16:19.9
163.54003 -23.09594 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.6" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.613 Ginevra 0 -2 2 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:38:59.53 +26:16:19.9: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:38:59.53 +26:16:19.9: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.3638* 03 38 59.53 +26 16 19.9 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8638,14.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3638 14.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3638 2461295.8638 14.19 03:45:16.84 +30:44:28.4
161.57691 -18.79247 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 6685760
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.795 r Y 0.678 r 2451508.29000 310.637512600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:45:16.84 +30:44:28.4: 15.16 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:45:16.84 +30:44:28.4: 15.09 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.3638* 03 45 16.84 +30 44 28.4 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 6685760,2461295.8638,14.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 6685760 20260912.3638 14.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461295.86415738 12.09.2026 08:44:13.198 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 42 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13802
Objects passed selection criteria: 13790
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13202.8
Average stars matched: 12802.2 (96.9665 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239604 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 04:35:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461295.86415738 12.09.2026 08:44:13.198 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 136
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.06
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 88 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 93964
Objects passed selection criteria: 93761
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 87574.2
Average stars matched: 84861.2 (96.9021 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 546412 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 04:38:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461295.86346193
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:09.256 +29:59:48.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 04:00:09.256 +29:59:48.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0346 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:12.314 +29:59:42.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 04:00:12.314 +29:59:42.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0458 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:00:09.256 +29:59:48.36
Second-epoch second image center 04:00:12.314 +29:59:42.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01116 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EiiEzG2fhO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8aVt4zXR3s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5hN7tZlo6H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L5ljh1edAJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3062 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3062 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5544 out of 6056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6056 out of 13390 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.967300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.967300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3062 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3062 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5544 out of 6056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6056 out of 13390 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5733 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3107 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5733 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3107 deg
Loaded 7269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5557 out of 6071 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6071 out of 13513 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.EiiEzG2fhO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13390
Got 13390 stars (including 12252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1524 n_q2=1103 n_q3=892 n_q4=1376 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8aVt4zXR3s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13513
Got 13513 stars (including 12361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1523 n_q2=1108 n_q3=895 n_q4=1373 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5hN7tZlo6H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=787, bad_region=0, passed=13046
Got 13046 stars (including 12243 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13046 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13045 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13045 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13045 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4887 stars left (next iteration limit 5376)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=9.111 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.472 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=0.336 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.352 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=0.271 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.322 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4887 robust_rms_before=0.954 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.301 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.271 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.365 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.322
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:09.289 +29:59:47.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13046 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1512502.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.954 -> 0.271 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4887 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4764 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4764 pairs (4887 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4764 robust_rms=9.007 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.359 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4764 robust_rms=0.334 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.347 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4764 robust_rms=0.270 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.318 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4764 robust_rms_before=0.269 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.269 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.270 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.318 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.318
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:09.289 +29:59:47.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13046 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1512746.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.269 -> 0.270 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13045 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits N_match=4764 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1330 n_q2=831 n_q3=1150 n_q4=1453 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.L5ljh1edAJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=781, bad_region=0, passed=13116
Got 13116 stars (including 12318 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13116 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4887 stars left (next iteration limit 5375)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=9.179 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.392 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=0.318 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.348 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=0.251 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.296 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4887 robust_rms_before=0.932 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.284 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.251 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.345 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.296
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:12.339 +29:59:41.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13116 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1512602.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.932 -> 0.251 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4887 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4767 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4767 pairs (4887 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=9.072 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.250 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.312 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.338 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.250 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.294 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4767 robust_rms_before=0.250 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.250 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.250 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.293 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.294
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-quadrant 0.294 vs 0.293 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits N_match=4767 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=1323 n_q2=829 n_q3=1156 n_q4=1459 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.233
ref2=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.337 worst_q_ratio=1.288
new1=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=1.215
new2=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits sigma_overall=0.271 worst_q_ratio=1.211
reference average sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.2605
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (4899 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386_astrometric_residuals.png (4764 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387_astrometric_residuals.png (4767 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.20 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_034455_TTUQ1b1x1_2581899_xDOWwr5U/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:07:43.95 +31:49:36.8: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:01:20.58 +30:18:50.7: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:40:07.64 +26:36:34.3: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:02:05.09 +31:23:51.6: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:43:52.31 +25:16:25.3: 10.96 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:38:19.08 +32:03:13.7: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:07:06.11 +30:10:48.1: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:38:19.08 +32:03:13.7: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:43:52.31 +25:16:25.3: 10.94 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.95 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:40:07.64 +26:36:34.3: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:07:43.95 +31:49:36.8: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:52.31 +25:16:25.3: ref_mag=10.95 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4558 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:19.08 +32:03:13.7: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4701 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:26:56.54 +34:22:43.7: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:01:20.58 +30:18:50.7: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:07.64 +26:36:34.3: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0367 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:43.95 +31:49:36.8: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4665 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:02:05.09 +31:23:51.6: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:20.58 +30:18:50.7: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5366 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:05.09 +31:23:51.6: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5295 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:07:06.11 +30:10:48.1: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:06.11 +30:10:48.1: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4899 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:26:56.54 +34:22:43.7: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:56.54 +34:22:43.7: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5163 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20887_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 20887_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20890_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 20890_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20891_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 20891_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20892_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 20892_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:43.80 +25:42:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20965_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 20965_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:56.04 +30:22:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20978_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 20978_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:15.25 +33:48:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21019_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 21019_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21041_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 21041_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21050_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 21050_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21051_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 21051_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21055_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 21055_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01673_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 01673_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:38.02 +34:15:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03432_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 03432_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117555_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117555_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117559_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117559_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117574_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117574_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117583_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117583_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117585_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117585_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117587_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117587_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117588_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117588_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:07.17 +34:44:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117590_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117590_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117595_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117595_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117597_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117597_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117602_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117602_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117604_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117604_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:49.21 +29:06:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117605_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117605_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117606_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117606_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:27:04.70 +33:21:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117607_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117607_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117608_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117608_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:24.82 +28:20:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117609_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117609_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117610_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117610_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117611_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117611_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117612_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117612_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:35.04 +34:51:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117613_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117613_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117614_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117614_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117687_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117687_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117705_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117705_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:49.10 +33:34:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117763_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117763_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117814_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117814_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117832_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117832_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:31.55 +33:49:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117854_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117854_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117870_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117870_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117894_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117894_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117908_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117908_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:24.90 +32:27:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117938_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117938_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:29.72 +33:27:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117962_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 117962_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117987_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117987_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118028_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118028_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:21.32 +33:28:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118052_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118052_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:06.06 +32:33:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118053_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118053_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:40.00 +32:28:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118060_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118060_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:14.42 +34:32:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118071_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118071_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:28.18 +33:18:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118102_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118102_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118106_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118106_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118107_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118107_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:48.18 +27:33:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118115_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118115_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:35.34 +34:40:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118120_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118120_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118127_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118127_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:03:08.83 +34:51:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118130_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118130_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118140_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118140_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:27:32.02 +34:49:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118159_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 118159_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118197_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118197_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118214_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118214_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:42.01 +30:27:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118247_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118247_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118249_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118249_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118250_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118250_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118251_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118251_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118259_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118259_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118275_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118275_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118283_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118283_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118290_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118290_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118296_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118296_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118306_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118306_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118326_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118326_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118331_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 118331_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118335_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118335_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:49.20 +34:28:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118340_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118340_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118341_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118341_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118349_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118349_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118354_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118354_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118390_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118390_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:52.51 +25:19:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118393_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118393_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:53.66 +32:27:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118421_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118421_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118465_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118465_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118470_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118470_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118480_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 118480_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118491_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 118491_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118496_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118496_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118504_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118504_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118516_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118516_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118539_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 118539_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118548_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118548_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118557_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118557_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118565_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118565_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118572_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118572_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118593_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118593_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118605_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118605_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118619_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118619_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118631_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118631_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118661_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118661_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118679_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118679_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118683_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118683_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118713_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118713_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118725_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118725_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118737_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118737_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118743_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118743_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118745_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118745_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118751_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118751_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118758_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118758_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118765_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118765_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118769_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118769_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118773_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118773_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118791_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118791_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118793_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118793_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118796_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118796_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118810_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118810_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118814_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118814_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:49.76 +28:29:33.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=15.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=16.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.564 164702070133970944 064.45694135376 +28.49331765766 14.4446 13.0675 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.564#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118817_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118817_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118818_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118818_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118858_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118858_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118869_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 118869_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117168_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 117168_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72300_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 72300_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:34.39 +26:16:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110522_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 110522_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:16.31 +33:02:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52535_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52535_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:56.06 +30:22:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96483_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 96483_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:17.03 +28:10:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84145_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 84145_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:01.78 +27:15:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:15.27 +33:48:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38883_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 38883_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:38.02 +34:15:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23744_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 23744_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:44.74 +33:15:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49632_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 49632_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54567_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 54567_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:50.21 +29:42:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39689_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 39689_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:10.25 +31:21:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43917_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 43917_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-44-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
