This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3380 2461295.8380 8.91 06:44:32.39 +22:57:44.8
191.57698 8.81421 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 1 -0 1 8.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:44:32.39 +22:57:44.8: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:44:32.39 +22:57:44.8: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8380,8.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3380 8.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3380 2461295.8380 10.73 06:21:33.67 +21:56:05.8
190.08853 3.61302 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" BX Gem
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.940 V Y 0.390 V 2452789.00000 77.697008000000 M5:
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:21:33.67 +21:56:05.8: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:21:33.67 +21:56:05.8: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
BX Gem,2461295.8380,10.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
BX Gem 20260912.3380 10.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3380 2461295.8380 11.71 06:30:05.43 +25:26:09.5
187.86542 6.95509 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope -0 0 0 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:05.43 +25:26:09.5: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:30:05.43 +25:26:09.5: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8380,11.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3380 11.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3380 2461295.8380 13.43 06:27:42.72 +22:36:57.0
190.14342 5.18952 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.179 Klytaemnestra -0 -0 0 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:42.72 +22:36:57.0: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:27:42.72 +22:36:57.0: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8380,13.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3380 13.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3380 2461295.8380 13.79 06:02:33.30 +19:21:50.9
190.20796 -1.52099 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.377 Campania -2 0 2 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:02:33.30 +19:21:50.9: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:02:33.30 +19:21:50.9: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.3380* 06 02 33.30 +19 21 50.9 13.8 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8380,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3380 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3380 2461295.8380 13.62 06:25:44.40 +21:42:00.8
190.74847 4.36291 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX13" ZTF J062544.05+214148.6
Type: EW
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.029 r Y 0.755 r 2458380.02200 0.276033400000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.76 Freia -2 1 2 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:44.40 +21:42:00.8: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:25:44.40 +21:42:00.8: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J062544.05+214148.6,2461295.8380,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J062544.05+214148.6 20260912.3380 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3380 2461295.8380 13.97 06:04:05.83 +22:50:12.8
187.36156 0.50109 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.566 Stereoskopia -2 1 2 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:05.83 +22:50:12.8: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:04:05.83 +22:50:12.8: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.8380,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.3380 13.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3380 2461295.8380 12.00 06:52:25.02 +19:09:38.0
195.85001 8.81548 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0652250+190940
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.372 R1 Y 0.563 R1 57.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:52:25.02 +19:09:38.0: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:52:25.02 +19:09:38.0: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0652250+190940,2461295.8380,12.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0652250+190940 20260912.3380 12.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3380 2461295.8380 11.72 06:25:21.81 +16:59:50.2
194.87991 2.10167 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS J0625217+165949
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.900 V < 15.900 V 2451604.00000 443.000000000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:21.81 +16:59:50.2: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:25:21.81 +16:59:50.2: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.3380* 06 25 21.81 +16 59 50.2 11.7 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0625217+165949,2461295.8380,11.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0625217+165949 20260912.3380 11.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461295.83825169 12.09.2026 08:06:54.946 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27895
Objects passed selection criteria: 27849
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 22944
Average stars matched: 21784 (94.9442 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 255340 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 03:10:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461295.83825169 12.09.2026 08:06:54.946 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 171
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 146 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 178610
Objects passed selection criteria: 178253
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 144681
Average stars matched: 140244 (96.9332 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 577216 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 03:16:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461295.83766722
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:42.682 +22:00:06.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:42.682 +22:00:06.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0118 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:42.075 +22:00:48.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:42.075 +22:00:48.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0092 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:42.682 +22:00:06.88
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:42.075 +22:00:48.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01174 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jUyan6E5Qo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2KsrTtrnXD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QvdAbg4A7y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MSHq8sxZGo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh has not found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.881900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.881900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec +16.5172 to +27.2358 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec 16.5172 to 27.2358 deg
Loaded 19341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14457 out of 15956 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15956 out of 31529 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
3.0 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
3.0 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.2 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.jUyan6E5Qo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3278, bad_region=0, passed=29338
Got 29338 stars (including 26023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4819 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4819 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1143 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2KsrTtrnXD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3030, bad_region=0, passed=31529
Got 31529 stars (including 28473 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4816 stars left (next iteration limit 5296)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4816 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.684 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.619 n_q1=1184 n_q2=1326 n_q3=1090 n_q4=1216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.289
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QvdAbg4A7y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=884, bad_region=0, passed=15639
Got 15639 stars (including 14743 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15639 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4846 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4787 stars left (next iteration limit 5264)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=6.850 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.413 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.535 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.946 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.403 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.652 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4787 robust_rms_before=1.458 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.434 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.403 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.515 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.652
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.515 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits N_match=4787 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.484 n_q1=1378 n_q2=818 n_q3=1566 n_q4=1025 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MSHq8sxZGo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=939, bad_region=0, passed=15807
Got 15807 stars (including 14854 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15807 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4790 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4790 stars left (next iteration limit 5266)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=7.152 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.968 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.466 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.074 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.520 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4790 robust_rms_before=1.496 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.444 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.393 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.535 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.520
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.535 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits N_match=4790 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.495 n_q1=1385 n_q2=834 n_q3=1547 n_q4=1024 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.175
ref2=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits sigma_overall=0.530 worst_q_ratio=1.289
new1=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits sigma_overall=0.417 worst_q_ratio=1.197
new2=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits sigma_overall=0.419 worst_q_ratio=1.259
reference average sigma_overall=0.45 worst_q_ratio=1.232
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4819 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041_astrometric_residuals.png (4816 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350_astrometric_residuals.png (4787 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351_astrometric_residuals.png (4790 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:44:32.39 +22:57:44.8: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:28.95 +19:43:00.8: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:21:33.67 +21:56:05.8: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:04:28.95 +19:43:00.8: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:44:32.39 +22:57:44.8: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:28.95 +19:43:00.8: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8615 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:21:33.67 +21:56:05.8: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:21:33.67 +21:56:05.8: ref_mag=11.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7301 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out14860.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34193.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34165_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 34165_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:33.44 +18:22:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34193_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
Preparing report for the candidate 34193_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34284_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 34284_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:03.74 +23:20:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34346_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 34346_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:30.69 +20:02:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34563_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 34563_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33107_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 33107_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:43.74 +18:15:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14860_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
Preparing report for the candidate 14860_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 13s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:21:33.67 +21:56:05.8
06:44:32.39 +22:57:44.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:42.682 +22:00:06.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:42.682 +22:00:06.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0118 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:42.075 +22:00:48.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:42.075 +22:00:48.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0092 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:42.682 +22:00:06.88
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:42.075 +22:00:48.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01174 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jU1RqRP7c3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ItVenVKRTT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s2lfV3U1Wg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x9eIx0yFP8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.736100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.736100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 188638 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec +16.4980 to +27.2397 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec 16.4980 to 27.2397 deg
Loaded 19379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11515 out of 16583 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16583 out of 188638 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 153 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
3.0 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
2.9 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.jU1RqRP7c3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=47, blended=31903, bad_region=2, passed=206245
Got 206245 stars (including 174023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 206245 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1106 n_q2=1277 n_q3=1178 n_q4=1230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ItVenVKRTT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=44, blended=29566, bad_region=0, passed=188594
Got 188594 stars (including 158851 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 188594 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4797 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.647 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.569 n_q1=1146 n_q2=1371 n_q3=1051 n_q4=1229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.s2lfV3U1Wg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=7492, bad_region=5, passed=92760
Got 92760 stars (including 85151 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92760 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4790 stars left (next iteration limit 5264)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=7.046 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.488 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.541 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.918 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.397 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.656 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4790 robust_rms_before=1.448 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.461 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.397 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.544 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.656
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.544 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits N_match=4790 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.479 n_q1=1369 n_q2=797 n_q3=1565 n_q4=1059 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.x9eIx0yFP8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=7628, bad_region=8, passed=94325
Got 94325 stars (including 86587 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 94325 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 94325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 94325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 94325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4788 stars left (next iteration limit 5264)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4788 robust_rms=7.528 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.568 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4788 robust_rms=0.476 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.047 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4788 robust_rms=0.399 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.503 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4788 robust_rms_before=1.491 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.454 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.399 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.514 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.503
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.514 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits N_match=4788 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.484 n_q1=1367 n_q2=805 n_q3=1549 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.191
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_030743_TTUQ1b1x1_2750437_jlReA12z/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:20.08 +23:36:03.2: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:06.31 +20:26:40.2: 14.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:23.58 +18:58:38.3: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:20.52 +22:13:13.4: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:37:38.22 +23:13:31.4: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:20.08 +23:36:03.2: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:23:23.58 +18:58:38.3: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:05:06.31 +20:26:40.2: 14.56 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:03:20.52 +22:13:13.4: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:20.08 +23:36:03.2: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0842 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:23.58 +18:58:38.3: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3020 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:06.31 +20:26:40.2: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9534 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:37:38.22 +23:13:31.4: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:20.52 +22:13:13.4: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6708 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:38.22 +23:13:31.4: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8564 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:40:02.72 +20:31:08.8: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:40:02.72 +20:31:08.8: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:40:02.72 +20:31:08.8: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7945 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:42.11 +18:40:02.2: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:59.33 +20:16:20.7: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:16:58.42 +25:30:23.1: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:15.05 +17:30:15.1: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:59.33 +20:16:20.7: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:59.33 +20:16:20.7: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1686 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:42.11 +18:40:02.2: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:42.11 +18:40:02.2: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3678 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:29:15.05 +17:30:15.1: 12.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:25.82 +21:29:40.7: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:15.05 +17:30:15.1: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5685 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:16:58.42 +25:30:23.1: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:16:58.42 +25:30:23.1: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9813 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:53:38.11 +17:27:22.6: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:47:49.55 +23:20:54.8: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:25.24 +24:05:46.1: 12.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:59:25.82 +21:29:40.7: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:25.82 +21:29:40.7: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0719 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:53:38.11 +17:27:22.6: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:38.11 +17:27:22.6: ref_mag=11.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8666 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:47:49.55 +23:20:54.8: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:49.55 +23:20:54.8: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6489 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:25.24 +24:05:46.1: 12.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:25.24 +24:05:46.1: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.4730 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:55.63 +20:16:17.1: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:55.63 +20:16:17.1: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:55.63 +20:16:17.1: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3681 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:05.43 +25:26:09.5: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:30:05.43 +25:26:09.5: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:55:24.18 +20:11:40.6: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:55:24.18 +20:11:40.6: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:24.18 +20:11:40.6: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8978 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:33.58 +18:11:15.7: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:03:33.58 +18:11:15.7: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:33.58 +18:11:15.7: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9854 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:39:23.59 +26:08:48.8: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:57:43.83 +24:45:45.1: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:39:23.59 +26:08:48.8: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:23.59 +26:08:48.8: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8954 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:57:43.83 +24:45:45.1: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:43.83 +24:45:45.1: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3883 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:15.73 +26:58:11.2: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:19:15.73 +26:58:11.2: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:15.73 +26:58:11.2: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1043 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:32.75 +25:04:48.3: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:48.10 +24:59:24.5: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:22.89 +24:17:45.7: 13.55 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:30.93 +22:39:22.2: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:17:32.75 +25:04:48.3: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:32.75 +25:04:48.3: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2715 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:19:48.10 +24:59:24.5: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:48.10 +24:59:24.5: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1797 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:09:22.89 +24:17:45.7: 13.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:22.89 +24:17:45.7: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3496 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:42.99 +25:39:56.1: 13.64 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:53.70 +19:26:24.2: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:30.93 +22:39:22.2: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:30.93 +22:39:22.2: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9051 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:42.99 +25:39:56.1: 13.75 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:42.99 +25:39:56.1: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6048 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:17:53.70 +19:26:24.2: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:53.70 +19:26:24.2: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0954 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:25.34 +26:41:22.9: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:36.41 +25:38:55.2: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:19.79 +26:51:28.1: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:24.22 +25:58:09.4: 13.67 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:24:25.34 +26:41:22.9: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:25.34 +26:41:22.9: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3530 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:06:37.24 +24:16:38.0: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:36.41 +25:38:55.2: 13.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:36.41 +25:38:55.2: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4976 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:19.79 +26:51:28.1: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:18:19.79 +26:51:28.1: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5218 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:16.36 +23:32:39.4: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:24.22 +25:58:09.4: 13.77 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:24.22 +25:58:09.4: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5134 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:06:37.24 +24:16:38.0: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:37.24 +24:16:38.0: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7181 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:34:30.49 +23:50:25.1: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:16.36 +23:32:39.4: 13.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:16.36 +23:32:39.4: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5982 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:34:30.49 +23:50:25.1: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:34:30.49 +23:50:25.1: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4511 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:31.41 +23:28:42.9: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:02.07 +22:52:11.9: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:25:31.41 +23:28:42.9: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:31.41 +23:28:42.9: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5318 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:02:33.30 +19:21:50.9: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:05.83 +22:50:12.8: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:23:02.07 +22:52:11.9: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:42.72 +22:36:57.0: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:44.40 +21:42:00.8: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:02.07 +22:52:11.9: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5630 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:02:33.30 +19:21:50.9: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:27:42.72 +22:36:57.0: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:25:44.40 +21:42:00.8: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:04:05.83 +22:50:12.8: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:54:37.95 +25:55:08.7: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:54:37.95 +25:55:08.7: 13.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:37.95 +25:55:08.7: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4613 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:52:25.02 +19:09:38.0: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:52:25.02 +19:09:38.0: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:52:25.02 +19:09:38.0: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9933 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:31.76 +19:57:53.5: 14.46 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:31.76 +19:57:53.5: 14.40 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:18:31.76 +19:57:53.5: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6163 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:21.81 +16:59:50.2: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:25:21.81 +16:59:50.2: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:25:21.81 +16:59:50.2: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7222 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:02.22 +17:50:10.7: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:20:02.22 +17:50:10.7: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:20:02.22 +17:50:10.7: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9180 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05790.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out231290.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out233164.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out233189.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out233248.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out233334.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out43650.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230759_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230759_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230776_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230776_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230779_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230779_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230788_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230788_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:48.91 +25:37:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230797_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230797_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230798_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230798_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:48.00 +19:27:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230812_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230812_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:56.70 +20:11:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230824_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230824_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:16.61 +24:30:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230825_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230825_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230826_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230826_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:01.40 +26:15:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230829_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230829_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:17.77 +25:01:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230831_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230831_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:52.79 +18:21:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230840_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230840_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230841_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230841_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:01.35 +24:25:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230844_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230844_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:46.93 +21:47:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230846_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230846_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230848_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230848_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:44.85 +16:52:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230849_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230849_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230852_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230852_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:31.47 +17:09:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230853_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230853_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230854_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230854_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:23.41 +20:36:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230855_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230855_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230857_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230857_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:43.91 +23:55:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230861_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230861_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:31.14 +26:13:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230862_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230862_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230866_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230866_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230867_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230867_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:03.08 +25:11:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230870_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230870_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230872_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230872_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:51.25 +17:27:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230873_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230873_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230875_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230875_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:05.49 +26:33:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230904_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 230904_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:32.39 +22:57:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231007_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231007_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:03.62 +23:20:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231195_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231195_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:51.67 +24:02:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231228_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231228_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231262_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231262_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.93 +25:55:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231270_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231270_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:02.94 +23:18:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231290_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
Preparing report for the candidate 231290_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231337_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231337_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:04.28 +22:32:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231353_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231353_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:14.35 +23:18:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231455_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231455_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.52 +21:37:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231600_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231600_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:33.17 +22:53:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231636_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231636_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:52.05 +25:58:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231646_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231646_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:01.24 +21:52:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231678_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231678_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:39.00 +24:26:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231696_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231696_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:57.74 +23:16:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231715_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231715_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231746_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231746_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231757_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231757_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:49.75 +22:33:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231808_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231808_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:27.62 +24:26:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231813_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231813_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:11.70 +23:13:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231912_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231912_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:28.63 +24:23:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231957_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231957_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.74 +26:22:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231974_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 231974_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:59.92 +25:58:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232026_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232026_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:40.04 +25:01:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232033_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232033_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:47.49 +25:09:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232054_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232054_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:52.11 +18:15:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232061_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232061_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:38.59 +23:06:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232073_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232073_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232079_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232079_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:37.47 +24:36:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232103_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232103_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:21.62 +23:37:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232110_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232110_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:22.68 +25:23:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232125_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232125_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:02.37 +16:57:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232138_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232138_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:42.32 +20:26:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232186_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232186_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232192_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232192_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232225_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232225_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.13 +23:37:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232231_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232231_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:12.59 +23:58:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232238_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232238_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:39.61 +23:08:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232243_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232243_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:47.56 +19:10:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232264_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232264_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:59.18 +19:27:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232266_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232266_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:45.99 +22:43:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232290_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232290_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:21.58 +20:55:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232308_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232308_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:18.48 +22:44:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232336_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232336_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232337_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232337_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:12.88 +22:43:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232360_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232360_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:04.72 +24:51:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232364_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232364_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:09.73 +22:18:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232382_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232382_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:05.58 +21:05:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232395_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232395_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:49.29 +24:22:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232399_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232399_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:21.06 +18:34:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232410_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232410_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:32.11 +18:42:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232415_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232415_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232440_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232440_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232447_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232447_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:17.97 +26:30:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232471_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232471_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:10.61 +22:27:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232499_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232499_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232535_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232535_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:54.33 +22:10:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232547_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232547_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232562_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232562_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:14.29 +23:20:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232593_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232593_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232643_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232643_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232678_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232678_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:23.36 +19:13:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232703_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232703_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:16.73 +22:22:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232720_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232720_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:25.20 +23:49:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232731_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232731_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:45.17 +19:25:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232748_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232748_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:14.84 +18:55:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232751_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232751_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:58.26 +24:31:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232752_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232752_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:27.67 +17:26:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232783_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232783_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.46 +24:04:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232795_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232795_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:25.71 +25:31:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232806_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232806_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232812_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232812_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:15.91 +26:01:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232828_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232828_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232853_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232853_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232855_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232855_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:56.35 +22:12:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232863_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232863_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:06.73 +25:19:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232864_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232864_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232865_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232865_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232892_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232892_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:53.29 +22:57:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232961_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232961_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232967_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 232967_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:19.36 +25:19:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233014_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 233014_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233043_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 233043_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:04.70 +24:56:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233075_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 233075_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:23.01 +25:18:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233092_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 233092_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233119_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 233119_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:55.27 +26:27:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233128_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 233128_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233164_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
Preparing report for the candidate 233164_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233189_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
Preparing report for the candidate 233189_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233248_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
Preparing report for the candidate 233248_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233260_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 233260_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:16.92 +21:42:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233334_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
Preparing report for the candidate 233334_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104672_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 104672_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:33.67 +21:56:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194267_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 194267_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:07.61 +25:02:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105975_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 105975_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:23.00 +22:04:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183592_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 183592_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:38.35 +25:32:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25445_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 25445_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:39.40 +18:05:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153572_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 153572_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:09.76 +24:26:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61063_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 61063_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:30.68 +20:02:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127632_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 127632_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:47.15 +23:09:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86188_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 86188_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:30.21 +21:08:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217940_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 217940_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:43.76 +18:15:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35533_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 35533_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:49.20 +18:43:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89941_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 89941_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:26.56 +21:22:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43650_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
Preparing report for the candidate 43650_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59661_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 59661_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:58.50 +19:53:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110234_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 110234_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.21 +21:51:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63283_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 63283_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70632_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 70632_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:26.12 +20:28:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101327_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 101327_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:10.59 +21:50:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42618_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 42618_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:42.97 +18:57:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26518_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 26518_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:38.99 +18:11:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05790_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
Preparing report for the candidate 05790_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20425_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 20425_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:33.69 +17:50:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56915_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 56915_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:06.08 +19:46:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47494_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 47494_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:39.28 +19:11:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21777_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 21777_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121256_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 121256_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:54.37 +22:43:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147365_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 147365_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:27.08 +23:51:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37474_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 37474_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:27.07 +18:39:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59538_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 59538_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_03-06-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
