This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3133 2461295.8133 14.71 17:32:17.93 +73:25:05.6
104.56746 31.53322 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 17:32:17.93 +73:25:05.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 17:32:17.93 +73:25:05.6: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 17:32:17.93 +73:25:05.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461295.8133,14.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260912.3133 14.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3133 2461295.8133 14.60 13:44:15.76 +79:37:53.9
119.97336 37.19133 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.6" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:44:15.76 +79:37:53.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 13:44:15.76 +79:37:53.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 13:44:15.76 +79:37:53.9: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461295.8133,14.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260912.3133 14.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3133 2461295.8133 14.78 18:30:06.32 +78:22:54.6
109.85462 27.60029 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.2" and 1.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:30:06.32 +78:22:54.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 18:30:06.32 +78:22:54.6: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 18:30:06.32 +78:22:54.6: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461295.8133,14.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260912.3133 14.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.3133 2461295.8133 15.06 16:55:24.04 +75:40:20.5
107.93006 33.27156 galactic UMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 16:55:24.04 +75:40:20.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 16:55:24.04 +75:40:20.5: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 16:55:24.04 +75:40:20.5: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461295.8133,15.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260912.3133 15.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.87947986 16.04.2026 09:06:17.060 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
First image: 2461146.87947986 16.04.2026 09:06:17.060 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Last image: 2461295.81353922 12.09.2026 07:31:19.789 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9967
Objects passed selection criteria: 9958
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9159.25
Average stars matched: 9037.5 (98.6707 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235956 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 05:00:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.87947986 16.04.2026 09:06:17.060 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
First image: 2461146.87947986 16.04.2026 09:06:17.060 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Last image: 2461295.81353922 12.09.2026 07:31:19.789 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 168
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.11
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 211 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 56371
Objects passed selection criteria: 56260
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 53730.8
Average stars matched: 52746 (98.1673 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 278840 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 12 05:05:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461295.81302308
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:01:03.471 +77:27:58.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05
Second-epoch image center 16:01:03.471 +77:27:58.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0644 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:01:03.533 +77:28:00.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05
Second-epoch image center 16:01:03.533 +77:28:00.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0641 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:01:03.471 +77:27:58.46
Second-epoch second image center 16:01:03.533 +77:28:00.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00062 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00062 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pgZEKZNiEr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Qo5KaJTtkU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JLoqkjtqsw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IS5am1Aya8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10691 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.5714 to 286.0278 deg, Dec +70.2810 to +82.8119 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.5714 to 286.0278 deg, Dec 70.2810 to 82.8119 deg
Loaded 12699 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6329 out of 6676 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6676 out of 10691 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.810800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.810800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10691 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.5714 to 286.0278 deg, Dec +70.2810 to +82.8119 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.5714 to 286.0278 deg, Dec 70.2810 to 82.8119 deg
Loaded 12699 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6329 out of 6676 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6676 out of 10691 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 10169 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.5610 to 286.6212 deg, Dec +70.5002 to +82.8178 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.5610 to 286.6212 deg, Dec 70.5002 to 82.8178 deg
Loaded 12465 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6292 out of 6524 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6524 out of 10169 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
2.3 pix UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
15.3 mag. UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
15.0 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
15.0 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.pgZEKZNiEr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=761, bad_region=0, passed=10690
Got 10690 stars (including 9914 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10690 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=1085 n_q2=1259 n_q3=1165 n_q4=1393 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Qo5KaJTtkU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=585, bad_region=0, passed=10169
Got 10169 stars (including 9572 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10169 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.390 n_q1=1430 n_q2=1180 n_q3=1213 n_q4=1088 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JLoqkjtqsw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=459, bad_region=1, passed=8033
Got 8033 stars (including 7566 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8033 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=9.303 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.585 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.491 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.513 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.285 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.306 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4905 robust_rms_before=0.762 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.263 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.285 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.280 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.306
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.280 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1475 n_q2=1129 n_q3=1318 n_q4=983 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.018
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.IS5am1Aya8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=486, bad_region=1, passed=7991
Got 7991 stars (including 7497 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7991 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=9.281 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.618 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.503 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.522 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.293 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.321 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4907 robust_rms_before=0.765 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.279 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.293 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.300 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.321
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.300 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1476 n_q2=1127 n_q3=1323 n_q4=981 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.060
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.169
ref2=UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.134
new1=fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits sigma_overall=0.273 worst_q_ratio=1.018
new2=fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits sigma_overall=0.285 worst_q_ratio=1.060
reference average sigma_overall=0.35 worst_q_ratio=1.1515
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (4902 matched stars from wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274_astrometric_residuals.png (4911 matched stars from wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316_astrometric_residuals.png (4905 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20454_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 20454_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:34:51.53 +80:45:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20030_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 20030_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:19:02.63 +81:03:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:01:03.471 +77:27:58.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05
Second-epoch image center 16:01:03.471 +77:27:58.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0644 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:01:03.533 +77:28:00.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05
Second-epoch image center 16:01:03.533 +77:28:00.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0641 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:01:03.471 +77:27:58.46
Second-epoch second image center 16:01:03.533 +77:28:00.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00062 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00062 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.icDc66r8hX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ygNRe607Dj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sLW54RsgFX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YioChJQvRj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 63033 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.0727 to 286.1546 deg, Dec +70.2810 to +82.8119 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.0727 to 286.1546 deg, Dec 70.2810 to 82.8119 deg
Loaded 12774 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5842 out of 6790 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6790 out of 63033 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.685800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.685800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.11
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 63033 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.0727 to 286.1546 deg, Dec +70.2810 to +82.8119 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.0727 to 286.1546 deg, Dec 70.2810 to 82.8119 deg
Loaded 12774 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5842 out of 6790 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6790 out of 63033 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 56082 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.2817 to 286.6211 deg, Dec +70.4438 to +82.8301 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.2817 to 286.6211 deg, Dec 70.4438 to 82.8301 deg
Loaded 12608 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5993 out of 6691 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6691 out of 56082 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 136 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
2.2 pix UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
2.1 pix fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
2.0 pix fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
15.4 mag. UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
15.1 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
15.2 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.icDc66r8hX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=3819, bad_region=47, passed=63015
Got 63015 stars (including 59032 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63015 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=1127 n_q2=1256 n_q3=1180 n_q4=1336 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ygNRe607Dj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=3064, bad_region=0, passed=56053
Got 56053 stars (including 52907 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56053 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1399 n_q2=1189 n_q3=1183 n_q4=1125 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.sLW54RsgFX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2243, bad_region=18, passed=48509
Got 48509 stars (including 46156 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48509 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=9.437 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.717 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=0.490 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.508 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=0.280 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.298 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4902 robust_rms_before=0.745 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.259 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.280 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.274 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.298
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.274 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.245 n_q1=1449 n_q2=1128 n_q3=1319 n_q4=1006 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.037
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YioChJQvRj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2267, bad_region=18, passed=49033
Got 49033 stars (including 46658 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49033 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=9.557 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.404 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.495 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.518 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.285 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.306 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4900 robust_rms_before=0.743 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.271 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.285 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.290 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.306
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.290 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=1438 n_q2=1137 n_q3=1310 n_q4=1015 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.074
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-30-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-12_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_023158_TTUQ1b1x1_84536_XZpnV3GP/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 15:42:33.62 +80:40:10.0: 14.55 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 13:40:03.28 +76:57:28.3: 14.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 16:05:23.73 +82:14:10.3: 14.78 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 14:50:18.36 +81:50:25.6: 15.12 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 17:57:46.85 +77:45:52.2: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 18:41:20.24 +79:01:56.1: 14.49 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 15:43:19.37 +82:16:31.8: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 16:05:23.73 +82:14:10.3: 14.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:23.73 +82:14:10.3: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6927 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 14:50:18.36 +81:50:25.6: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 18:41:20.24 +79:01:56.1: 14.50 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 15:42:33.62 +80:40:10.0: 14.74 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:41:20.24 +79:01:56.1: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6364 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:18.36 +81:50:25.6: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0290 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 13:40:03.28 +76:57:28.3: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 17:57:46.85 +77:45:52.2: 14.32 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 15:43:19.37 +82:16:31.8: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:33.62 +80:40:10.0: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8390 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 13:33:19.86 +79:31:34.4: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:19.37 +82:16:31.8: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0750 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:40:03.28 +76:57:28.3: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3542 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:57:46.85 +77:45:52.2: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6317 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 17:49:25.19 +77:00:18.5: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 13:33:19.86 +79:31:34.4: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:33:19.86 +79:31:34.4: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7315 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 17:49:25.19 +77:00:18.5: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:49:25.19 +77:00:18.5: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3887 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 15:29:15.16 +78:38:55.1: 11.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 15:29:15.16 +78:38:55.1: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:29:15.16 +78:38:55.1: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9400 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 13:42:28.66 +79:44:32.3: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 16:35:01.19 +79:08:29.4: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 13:42:28.66 +79:44:32.3: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:42:28.66 +79:44:32.3: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1269 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 16:35:01.19 +79:08:29.4: 14.44 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 13:47:35.81 +80:30:59.5: 14.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:01.19 +79:08:29.4: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3732 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 13:47:05.81 +80:20:37.1: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 13:47:35.81 +80:30:59.5: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 18:06:01.21 +80:40:44.0: 15.02 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 17:32:17.93 +73:25:05.6: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:47:35.81 +80:30:59.5: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4306 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 13:44:15.76 +79:37:53.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 13:47:05.81 +80:20:37.1: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:47:05.81 +80:20:37.1: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4853 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 18:29:43.29 +77:22:16.2: 15.26 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 17:32:17.93 +73:25:05.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 13:44:15.76 +79:37:53.9: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 18:25:24.32 +80:00:16.0: 15.42 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 18:06:01.21 +80:40:44.0: 15.40 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:06:01.21 +80:40:44.0: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8859 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 13:59:09.53 +81:47:24.9: 15.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 18:29:43.29 +77:22:16.2: 15.13 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:29:43.29 +77:22:16.2: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8934 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 18:30:06.32 +78:22:54.6: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 18:25:24.32 +80:00:16.0: 15.32 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:25:24.32 +80:00:16.0: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9551 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 13:59:09.53 +81:47:24.9: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:59:09.53 +81:47:24.9: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6476 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 17:44:03.38 +80:54:50.1: 15.22 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 18:30:06.32 +78:22:54.6: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 15:09:00.03 +80:09:54.7: 15.01 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 14:58:22.33 +82:07:28.8: 14.85 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 17:44:03.38 +80:54:50.1: 15.18 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:03.38 +80:54:50.1: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9150 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 15:09:00.03 +80:09:54.7: 15.05 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:09:00.03 +80:09:54.7: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8310 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 14:58:22.33 +82:07:28.8: 15.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:22.33 +82:07:28.8: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7456 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 14:49:00.04 +77:32:43.5: 14.85 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 14:49:00.04 +77:32:43.5: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:00.04 +77:32:43.5: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6614 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 14:37:41.04 +81:59:55.9: 15.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 15:18:31.68 +82:27:22.8: 15.32 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 14:37:41.04 +81:59:55.9: 15.15 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:41.04 +81:59:55.9: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8476 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 15:18:31.68 +82:27:22.8: 15.26 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:31.68 +82:27:22.8: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8745 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 16:48:01.20 +81:16:46.8: 15.06 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 16:55:24.04 +75:40:20.5: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 13:43:03.78 +80:55:24.0: 15.41 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 15:12:37.68 +82:18:06.4: 15.48 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 16:48:01.20 +81:16:46.8: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:01.20 +81:16:46.8: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0652 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 14:32:12.78 +80:17:17.0: 15.65 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 16:55:24.04 +75:40:20.5: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 13:44:35.84 +79:33:47.8: 15.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 15:12:37.68 +82:18:06.4: 15.40 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:12:37.68 +82:18:06.4: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9565 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 13:43:03.78 +80:55:24.0: 15.45 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 14:23:43.90 +79:20:35.1: 15.34 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:43:03.78 +80:55:24.0: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.8478 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 13:44:35.84 +79:33:47.8: 15.10 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 14:32:12.78 +80:17:17.0: 15.51 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:44:35.84 +79:33:47.8: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8632 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:32:12.78 +80:17:17.0: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.8694 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 14:23:43.90 +79:20:35.1: 14.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:43.90 +79:20:35.1: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8117 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76214.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76229.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76252.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76367.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 28s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75758_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75758_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75760_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75760_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75768_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75768_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75774_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75774_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75780_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75780_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75784_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75784_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:06.57 +82:29:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75785_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75785_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75786_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75786_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75790_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75790_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75795_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75795_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75799_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75799_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75800_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75800_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:39:18.34 +81:44:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75801_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75801_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:05:08.71 +82:10:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75802_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75802_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75803_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75803_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:30.55 +82:17:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75804_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75804_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75805_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75805_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75808_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75808_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75810_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75810_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75811_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75811_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75812_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75812_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75823_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75823_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75826_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75826_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75827_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75827_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75844_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75844_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75851_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75851_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75867_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75867_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75869_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75869_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75870_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75870_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75875_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75875_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75887_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75887_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75894_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75894_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75900_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75900_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75915_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75915_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:41:43.62 +79:34:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75922_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75922_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75924_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75924_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:50:25.22 +74:12:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75934_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75934_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75936_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75936_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75947_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75947_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75958_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75958_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:01:06.66 +76:44:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75966_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75966_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75969_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75969_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75974_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75974_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75975_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75975_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75977_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75977_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75995_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 75995_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76000_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76000_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76002_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76002_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:24.94 +82:10:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76006_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76006_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76008_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76008_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76010_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76010_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:17:27.87 +79:51:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76011_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76011_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76015_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76015_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76019_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76019_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76023_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76023_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76037_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76037_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76042_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76042_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76051_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76051_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76053_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76053_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76055_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76055_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76057_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76057_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76063_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76063_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:48:40.48 +79:20:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76064_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76064_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76067_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76067_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76068_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76068_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76076_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76076_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76080_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76080_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76081_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76081_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76082_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76082_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76083_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76083_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76098_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76098_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76104_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76104_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76113_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76113_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76116_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76116_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76117_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76117_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76119_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76119_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76121_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76121_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76128_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76128_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76138_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76138_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76142_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76142_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76143_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76143_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76150_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76150_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76151_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76151_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76152_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76152_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76157_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76157_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76166_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76166_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76173_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76173_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76175_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76175_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76177_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76177_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76186_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76186_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76195_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76195_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76199_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76199_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76200_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76200_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76202_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76202_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76210_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76210_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76212_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76212_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76214_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 76214_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76229_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 76229_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76237_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76237_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76242_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76242_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76243_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76243_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76250_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76250_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76251_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76251_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76252_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 76252_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76255_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76255_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76262_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76262_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76264_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76264_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76265_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76265_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76277_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76277_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76286_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76286_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76288_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76288_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76290_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76290_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76292_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76292_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76293_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76293_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76295_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76295_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76300_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76300_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76305_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76305_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76307_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76307_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76319_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76319_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76324_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76324_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76327_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76327_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76328_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76328_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76329_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76329_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76334_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76334_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76342_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76342_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76350_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76350_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76351_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76351_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76362_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76362_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76363_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76363_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76367_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 76367_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76387_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76387_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76395_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76395_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76397_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76397_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76403_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76403_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76408_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76408_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76478_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 76478_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-12_02-31-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks