This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.1656 2461295.6656 9.89 20:02:20.49 -22:31:59.9
19.33299 -25.15222 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.324 Bamberga 2 -1 2 10.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:02:20.49 -22:31:59.9: 14.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:02:20.49 -22:31:59.9: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.6656,9.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.1656 9.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.1656 2461295.6656 13.16 20:20:28.46 -25:05:30.8
18.16085 -29.91261 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.388 Charybdis 0 0 0 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:20:28.46 -25:05:30.8: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:20:28.46 -25:05:30.8: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 12.1656* 20 20 28.46 -25 05 30.8 13.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.6656,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.1656 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 12.1656 2461295.6656 13.38 20:22:18.81 -30:03:21.7
12.75877 -31.72765 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.769 Tatjana 0 0 0 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:22:18.81 -30:03:21.7: 14.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:22:18.81 -30:03:21.7: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461295.6656,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260912.1656 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
First image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Last image: 2461295.66580792 12.09.2026 03:58:35.804 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7592
Objects passed selection criteria: 7564
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5565
Average stars matched: 4559.25 (81.9272 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233488 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 11 23:20:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
First image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Last image: 2461295.66580792 12.09.2026 03:58:35.804 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 89
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.83
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 82 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 59406
Objects passed selection criteria: 59279
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 46988.2
Average stars matched: 39526.2 (84.1194 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 273464 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 11 23:23:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461295.66533684
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.048 -26:00:05.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:09:38.048 -26:00:05.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0059 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:40.418 -25:59:53.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:09:40.418 -25:59:53.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0137 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:38.048 -26:00:05.18
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:40.418 -25:59:53.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00941 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c3an22ctGJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ud3NoTu0Ux
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hDGhGslGi3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KmPKt4U8Fe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5807 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Loaded 9413 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4837 out of 4937 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4937 out of 5807 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.371200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.371200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5807 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Loaded 9413 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4837 out of 4937 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4937 out of 5807 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3742 to 311.4456 deg, Dec -31.2699 to -20.5799 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3742 to 311.4456 deg, Dec -31.2699 to -20.5799 deg
Loaded 9413 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5072 out of 5182 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5182 out of 6163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.2 mag. Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.c3an22ctGJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=383, bad_region=1211, passed=5807
Got 5807 stars (including 4291 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5807 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4233 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4219 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4219 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4233 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4219 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4219 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4219 stars left (next iteration limit 4640)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4219 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1415 n_q2=661 n_q3=1449 n_q4=694 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Ud3NoTu0Ux (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=423, bad_region=1252, passed=6163
Got 6163 stars (including 4578 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6163 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4517 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4500 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4500 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4517 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4500 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4500 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4500 stars left (next iteration limit 4950)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits N_match=4500 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.379 n_q1=1505 n_q2=683 n_q3=1568 n_q4=744 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hDGhGslGi3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=483, bad_region=2575, passed=9070
Got 9070 stars (including 6109 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9070 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4917 stars left (next iteration limit 5406)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=6.854 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.233 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=0.443 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.475 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=0.343 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.373 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4917 robust_rms_before=0.816 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.343 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.377 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.373
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.377 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=1601 n_q2=923 n_q3=1429 n_q4=964 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KmPKt4U8Fe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=490, bad_region=2589, passed=8969
Got 8969 stars (including 6002 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8969 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5404)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=6.777 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.850 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=0.453 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.483 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=0.368 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.412 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4914 robust_rms_before=0.804 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.363 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.368 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.401 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.412
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.401 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=1603 n_q2=925 n_q3=1422 n_q4=964 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.419 worst_q_ratio=1.236
ref2=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits sigma_overall=0.414 worst_q_ratio=1.274
new1=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.349 worst_q_ratio=1.115
new2=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.130
reference average sigma_overall=0.4165 worst_q_ratio=1.255
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (4219 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205_astrometric_residuals.png (4500 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (4917 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157_astrometric_residuals.png (4914 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:02:20.49 -22:31:59.9: 14.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:25:37.07 -24:27:45.6: 11.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:19:24.88 -25:13:42.1: 11.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:09:53.05 -27:35:06.8: 11.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:25:37.07 -24:27:45.6: 11.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:09:53.05 -27:35:06.8: 11.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:02:20.49 -22:31:59.9: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:19:24.88 -25:13:42.1: 11.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:37.07 -24:27:45.6: ref_mag=11.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2497 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:53.05 -27:35:06.8: ref_mag=11.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2355 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:24.88 -25:13:42.1: ref_mag=11.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1968 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20730.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20730_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 20730_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20911_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 20911_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:19.71 -23:55:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21298_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 21298_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:50.93 -27:11:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21358_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 21358_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21409_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 21409_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21414_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 21414_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:02:20.49 -22:31:59.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.048 -26:00:05.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:09:38.048 -26:00:05.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0059 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:40.418 -25:59:53.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:09:40.418 -25:59:53.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0137 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:38.048 -26:00:05.18
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:40.418 -25:59:53.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00941 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tsKKumTQEL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits &> /tmp/tmp.guwSRq06Ri
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WDArT9eJ1N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5OexJiBYZu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 49567 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Loaded 9468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7598 out of 8155 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8155 out of 49567 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.155050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.155050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.83
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 49567 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Loaded 9468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7598 out of 8155 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8155 out of 49567 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 52342 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3394 to 311.4652 deg, Dec -31.2712 to -20.5387 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3394 to 311.4652 deg, Dec -31.2712 to -20.5387 deg
Loaded 9484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7577 out of 8158 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8158 out of 52342 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 51 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.1 pix Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.4 mag. Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.tsKKumTQEL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2048, bad_region=8774, passed=49557
Got 49557 stars (including 38989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49557 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42826 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42826 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42826 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4916 stars left (next iteration limit 5406)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1723 n_q2=851 n_q3=1523 n_q4=819 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.guwSRq06Ri (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2212, bad_region=9047, passed=52328
Got 52328 stars (including 41340 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52328 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5406)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=1727 n_q2=835 n_q3=1536 n_q4=816 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WDArT9eJ1N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=3618, bad_region=13843, passed=66078
Got 66078 stars (including 49869 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66078 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4913 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=6.821 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.040 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=0.446 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.474 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.388 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4913 robust_rms_before=0.818 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.339 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.378 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.388
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.378 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=1582 n_q2=926 n_q3=1460 n_q4=945 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5OexJiBYZu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=3749, bad_region=13725, passed=66634
Got 66634 stars (including 50505 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66634 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4910 robust_rms=6.678 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.677 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4910 robust_rms=0.450 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.480 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4910 robust_rms=0.365 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.409 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4910 robust_rms_before=0.807 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.365 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.396 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.409
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.396 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=1592 n_q2=909 n_q3=1467 n_q4=942 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-57-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-11_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_231244_TTUQ2b1x1_2051460_1rLtip1S/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:27:41.39 -27:21:43.8: 13.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:56:25.35 -29:23:41.8: 13.55 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:06:00.59 -22:20:31.6: 13.49 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:56:43.82 -22:54:47.7: 13.55 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:16:11.12 -22:48:23.6: 13.58 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:56:51.73 -23:39:24.0: 13.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:53:05.37 -21:55:28.0: 13.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:55:22.58 -29:02:20.8: 13.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:03:24.83 -25:46:52.5: 13.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:55:53.03 -24:26:22.5: 13.53 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:53:05.37 -21:55:28.0: 13.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:27:41.39 -27:21:43.8: 13.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:06:00.59 -22:20:31.6: 13.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:56:43.82 -22:54:47.7: 13.55 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:56:25.35 -29:23:41.8: 13.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:05.37 -21:55:28.0: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5596 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:41.39 -27:21:43.8: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6138 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:16:11.12 -22:48:23.6: 13.59 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:00.59 -22:20:31.6: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6599 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:43.82 -22:54:47.7: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6868 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:25.35 -29:23:41.8: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4995 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:11.12 -22:48:23.6: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8400 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:56:51.73 -23:39:24.0: 13.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:51.73 -23:39:24.0: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5175 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:03:24.83 -25:46:52.5: 13.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:55:22.58 -29:02:20.8: 13.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:24.83 -25:46:52.5: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4187 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:22.58 -29:02:20.8: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5187 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:55:53.03 -24:26:22.5: 13.60 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:53.03 -24:26:22.5: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.5249 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:05:21.54 -23:09:10.7: 11.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:09:22.60 -24:09:58.3: 12.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:02:09.08 -23:56:10.9: 12.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:01:46.02 -22:15:44.3: 12.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:08:04.31 -27:33:04.2: 12.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:54:42.18 -27:22:06.6: 11.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:59:04.83 -23:20:22.7: 11.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:52:40.80 -26:50:27.7: 12.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:02:09.08 -23:56:10.9: 12.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:09:22.60 -24:09:58.3: 12.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:09.08 -23:56:10.9: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2016 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:05:21.54 -23:09:10.7: 11.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:22.60 -24:09:58.3: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0127 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:21.54 -23:09:10.7: ref_mag=11.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0996 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:54:42.18 -27:22:06.6: 11.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:42.18 -27:22:06.6: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9702 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:59:04.83 -23:20:22.7: 11.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:08:04.31 -27:33:04.2: 12.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:01:46.02 -22:15:44.3: 12.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:04.83 -23:20:22.7: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9124 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:04.31 -27:33:04.2: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9742 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:46.02 -22:15:44.3: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7914 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:22:45.92 -23:28:44.3: 12.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:52:40.80 -26:50:27.7: 12.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:40.80 -26:50:27.7: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2994 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:22:45.92 -23:28:44.3: 12.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:45.92 -23:28:44.3: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0808 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:54:54.72 -24:34:00.5: 13.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:03:55.50 -22:26:53.3: 13.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:20:28.46 -25:05:30.8: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:52:37.16 -24:58:37.8: 13.37 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:54:54.72 -24:34:00.5: 13.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:54.72 -24:34:00.5: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1831 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:57:28.88 -23:24:01.7: 13.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:58:18.64 -22:20:23.3: 13.31 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:04:40.72 -22:46:26.2: 13.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:50:54.28 -22:37:14.5: 13.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:20:28.46 -25:05:30.8: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:03:55.50 -22:26:53.3: 13.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:55.50 -22:26:53.3: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3243 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:52:37.16 -24:58:37.8: 13.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:37.16 -24:58:37.8: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4979 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:57:28.88 -23:24:01.7: 13.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:58:18.64 -22:20:23.3: 13.43 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:22:18.81 -30:03:21.7: 14.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:04:40.72 -22:46:26.2: 13.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:28.88 -23:24:01.7: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6087 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:18.64 -22:20:23.3: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6014 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:40.72 -22:46:26.2: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5422 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:50:23.24 -23:07:54.3: 13.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:50:54.28 -22:37:14.5: 13.54 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:54.28 -22:37:14.5: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6755 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:50:23.24 -23:07:54.3: 13.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:23.24 -23:07:54.3: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6376 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:54:30.69 -22:42:41.4: 14.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:22:18.81 -30:03:21.7: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:58:33.90 -23:39:41.9: 13.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:54:30.69 -22:42:41.4: 13.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:51:27.17 -24:53:00.5: 13.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:30.69 -22:42:41.4: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7436 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:57:32.43 -24:11:38.1: 13.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:02:48.32 -22:51:58.9: 13.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:05:48.14 -23:06:16.6: 13.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:51:05.90 -24:38:23.7: 13.34 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:58:33.90 -23:39:41.9: 13.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:33.90 -23:39:41.9: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6475 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:09:05.05 -24:33:22.4: 13.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:51:27.17 -24:53:00.5: 13.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:57:32.43 -24:11:38.1: 13.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:27.17 -24:53:00.5: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7207 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:32.43 -24:11:38.1: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7498 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:02:48.32 -22:51:58.9: 13.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:05:48.14 -23:06:16.6: 13.42 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:48.32 -22:51:58.9: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7501 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:48.14 -23:06:16.6: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7342 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:51:05.90 -24:38:23.7: 13.69 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:05.90 -24:38:23.7: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7703 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:09:05.05 -24:33:22.4: 13.70 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:05.05 -24:33:22.4: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7512 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:58:54.23 -28:38:30.7: 13.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:55:57.89 -30:06:02.9: 13.90 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:58:54.23 -28:38:30.7: 13.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:56:44.50 -27:09:30.9: 13.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:00:15.40 -28:28:35.2: 13.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:29:30.34 -28:54:02.2: 14.05 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:27:36.31 -29:35:58.3: 14.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:02:59.57 -30:14:33.0: 14.27 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:55:57.89 -30:06:02.9: 13.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:30:04.46 -29:53:50.4: 14.13 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:54.23 -28:38:30.7: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6869 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:57.89 -30:06:02.9: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6763 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:02:59.57 -30:14:33.0: 14.23 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:00:15.40 -28:28:35.2: 13.68 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:30:04.46 -29:53:50.4: 13.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:29:30.34 -28:54:02.2: 14.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:27:36.31 -29:35:58.3: 13.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:04.46 -29:53:50.4: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6855 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:59.57 -30:14:33.0: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.8393 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:15.40 -28:28:35.2: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8222 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:36.31 -29:35:58.3: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6548 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:30.34 -28:54:02.2: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8209 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:56:44.50 -27:09:30.9: 13.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:44.50 -27:09:30.9: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7969 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out60120.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out61809.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55534_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 55534_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55541_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 55541_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55544_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 55544_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55545_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 55545_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55546_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 55546_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55548_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 55548_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55549_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 55549_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55550_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 55550_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55551_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 55551_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55552_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 55552_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55555_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 55555_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55556_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 55556_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55557_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 55557_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55561_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 55561_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55562_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 55562_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55563_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 55563_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55814_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 55814_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:02:20.46 -22:31:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56028_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 56028_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:19.66 -23:55:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57106_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 57106_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57777_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 57777_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59046_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 59046_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:29.02 -21:58:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59671_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 59671_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59923_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 59923_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60120_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 60120_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60396_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 60396_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61169_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 61169_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61281_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 61281_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:48.84 -22:36:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61516_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 61516_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61585_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 61585_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61677_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 61677_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61681_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 61681_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61809_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 61809_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61874_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 61874_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61958_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 61958_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62031_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 62031_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62121_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 62121_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62144_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 62144_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62160_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 62160_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62324_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 62324_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62360_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 62360_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62639_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 62639_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62683_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 62683_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62751_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 62751_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62823_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 62823_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63127_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 63127_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63231_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 63231_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63319_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 63319_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63510_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 63510_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63732_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 63732_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41003_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 41003_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:05.74 -22:31:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50273_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157
The candidate 50273_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-11_22-58-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0157 did not pass the final checks