This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 10.4690 2461293.9690 13.64 03:45:42.89 +36:26:44.5
157.84164 -14.34946 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.3" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 03:45:42.89 +36:26:44.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:45:42.89 +36:26:44.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:45:42.89 +36:26:44.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 10.4690* 03 45 42.89 +36 26 44.5 13.6 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461293.9690,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260910.4690 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 10.4690 2461293.9690 13.78 03:58:00.96 +41:20:15.8
156.49408 -9.06640 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.0" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 03:58:00.96 +41:20:15.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:58:00.96 +41:20:15.8: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:58:00.96 +41:20:15.8: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 10.4690* 03 58 00.96 +41 20 15.8 13.8 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461293.9690,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260910.4690 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 10.4690 2461293.9690 13.18 04:32:17.37 +37:46:34.9
163.77813 -7.00832 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 04:32:17.37 +37:46:34.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: M4 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=1.397+/-0.035 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:32:17.37 +37:46:34.9: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:32:17.37 +37:46:34.9: 14.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 10.4690* 04 32 17.37 +37 46 34.9 13.2 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461293.9690,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260910.4690 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 10.4690 2461293.9690 13.31 03:58:58.11 +38:08:24.5
158.77489 -11.35116 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J059.7419+38.1400 | 03:58:58.11 +38:08:24.5 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) SpType: G8 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.673+/-0.031 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:58:58.11 +38:08:24.5: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:58:58.11 +38:08:24.5: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 10.4690* 03 58 58.11 +38 08 24.5 13.3 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J059.7419+38.1400,2461293.9690,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J059.7419+38.1400 20260910.4690 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 10.4690 2461293.9690 12.65 03:59:26.88 +38:54:53.8
158.32346 -10.70867 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 1.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J035926.82+385453.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.603 r Y 0.539 r 2458585.32080 100.020540000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:59:26.88 +38:54:53.8: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:59:26.88 +38:54:53.8: 13.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 10.4690* 03 59 26.88 +38 54 53.8 12.7 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J035926.82+385453.9,2461293.9690,12.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J035926.82+385453.9 20260910.4690 12.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 10.4690 2461293.9690 13.51 03:59:48.57 +38:33:33.3
158.61734 -10.92814 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 03:59:48.57 +38:33:33.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.613+/-0.028 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:59:48.57 +38:33:33.3: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:59:48.57 +38:33:33.3: 14.52 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 10.4690* 03 59 48.57 +38 33 33.3 13.5 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461293.9690,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260910.4690 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 10.4690 2461293.9690 13.35 03:56:00.89 +40:01:42.3
157.07123 -10.30517 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 03:56:00.89 +40:01:42.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G0 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.689+/-0.032 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:56:00.89 +40:01:42.3: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:56:00.89 +40:01:42.3: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 10.4690* 03 56 00.89 +40 01 42.3 13.3 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461293.9690,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260910.4690 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 10.4690 2461293.9690 13.35 03:55:39.16 +40:13:47.9
156.88439 -10.19740 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 03:55:39.16 +40:13:47.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.469+/-0.037 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:55:39.16 +40:13:47.9: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:55:39.16 +40:13:47.9: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 10.4690* 03 55 39.16 +40 13 47.9 13.3 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461293.9690,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260910.4690 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 10.4690 2461293.9690 13.13 04:00:06.03 +38:15:02.8
158.86958 -11.12077 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 04:00:06.03 +38:15:02.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.615+/-0.028 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:00:06.03 +38:15:02.8: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:00:06.03 +38:15:02.8: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 10.4690* 04 00 06.03 +38 15 02.8 13.1 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461293.9690,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260910.4690 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 10.4690 2461293.9690 13.21 04:01:51.63 +37:10:43.4
159.86450 -11.68582 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 04:01:51.63 +37:10:43.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G5 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.852+/-0.029 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:01:51.63 +37:10:43.4: 14.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:01:51.63 +37:10:43.4: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 10.4690* 04 01 51.63 +37 10 43.4 13.2 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461293.9690,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260910.4690 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.78853589 23.12.2025 06:55:19.501 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
First image: 2461032.78853589 23.12.2025 06:55:19.501 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Last image: 2461293.96925943 10.09.2026 11:15:34.015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16469
Objects passed selection criteria: 16413
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12424.8
Average stars matched: 11791.8 (94.9053 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 242664 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Sep 10 02:28:55 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-204-g1bee8b93
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 10 06:19:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.78853589 23.12.2025 06:55:19.501 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
First image: 2461032.78853589 23.12.2025 06:55:19.501 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Last image: 2461293.96925943 10.09.2026 11:15:34.015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 178
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 40 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 121334
Objects passed selection criteria: 121090
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 92785.5
Average stars matched: 87092.2 (93.8641 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 586040 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Sep 10 02:28:55 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-204-g1bee8b93
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 10 06:20:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461293.96875226
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:21:49.059 +37:59:50.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:21:52.919 +38:01:11.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:21:49.059 +37:59:50.85
Second-epoch image center 04:21:52.919 +38:01:11.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0257 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:21:52.298 +38:01:16.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:21:49.059 +37:59:50.85
Second-epoch image center 04:21:52.298 +38:01:16.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0260 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:21:52.919 +38:01:11.29
Second-epoch second image center 04:21:52.298 +38:01:16.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00249 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e3Tpi0rIkW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7o6yIQpH8v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2vNEXSWvrv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wAj1OKPWcF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits) and catalog (wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 18677 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.9661 to 76.3326 deg, Dec +32.1948 to +43.3141 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.9661 to 76.3326 deg, Dec 32.1948 to 43.3141 deg
Loaded 9192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6385 out of 7127 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7127 out of 18677 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.973500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.973500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 18677 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.9661 to 76.3326 deg, Dec +32.1948 to +43.3141 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.9661 to 76.3326 deg, Dec 32.1948 to 43.3141 deg
Loaded 9192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6385 out of 7127 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7127 out of 18677 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 18569 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.4956 to 75.7898 deg, Dec +32.0248 to +43.3806 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.4956 to 75.7898 deg, Dec 32.0248 to 43.3806 deg
Loaded 9219 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6462 out of 7192 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7192 out of 18569 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
2.1 pix Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
2.8 pix fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
2.9 pix fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
15.4 mag. Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.e3Tpi0rIkW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1808, bad_region=0, passed=18677
Got 18677 stars (including 16842 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18677 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4856 stars left (next iteration limit 5341)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits N_match=4856 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.245 n_q1=1609 n_q2=1204 n_q3=763 n_q4=1280 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.356
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7o6yIQpH8v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1757, bad_region=0, passed=18569
Got 18569 stars (including 16779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18569 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4857 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits N_match=4857 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=1197 n_q2=768 n_q3=1133 n_q4=1759 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.371
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2vNEXSWvrv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=286, bad_region=0, passed=6474
Got 6474 stars (including 6176 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6474 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4835 stars left (next iteration limit 5317)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4835 robust_rms=11.780 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.774 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4835 robust_rms=0.453 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.484 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4835 robust_rms=0.334 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.379 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4835 robust_rms_before=0.995 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.368 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.334 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.415 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.379
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.415 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits N_match=4835 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=999 n_q2=493 n_q3=1648 n_q4=1695 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wAj1OKPWcF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=276, bad_region=0, passed=6356
Got 6356 stars (including 6074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6356 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6356 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6356 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6356 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4841 stars left (next iteration limit 5324)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=11.673 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.651 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=0.446 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.492 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=0.332 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.373 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4841 robust_rms_before=0.969 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.367 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.332 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.448 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.373
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:21:52.321 +38:01:15.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6356 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3263973.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.969 -> 0.332 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4841 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4667 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4667 pairs (4841 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4667 robust_rms=11.500 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.228 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4667 robust_rms=0.443 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.488 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4667 robust_rms=0.330 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.373 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4667 robust_rms_before=0.330 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.330 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.330 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.375 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.373
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:21:52.321 +38:01:15.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6356 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3269944.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.330 -> 0.330 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4667 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6356 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4667 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6356 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits N_match=4667 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=1289 n_q2=601 n_q3=1457 n_q4=1320 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.356
ref2=Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits sigma_overall=0.390 worst_q_ratio=1.371
new1=fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.167
new2=fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.131
reference average sigma_overall=0.349 worst_q_ratio=1.3635
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342_astrometric_residuals.png (4856 matched stars from wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025_astrometric_residuals.png (4857 matched stars from wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083_astrometric_residuals.png (4835 matched stars from wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084_astrometric_residuals.png (4667 matched stars from wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Per-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22492_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 22492_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:36.61 +38:38:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18660_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 18660_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:59.26 +33:09:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07106_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 07106_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:15.96 +40:04:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12967_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 12967_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:28.00 +36:32:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Per-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:21:49.059 +37:59:50.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:21:52.919 +38:01:11.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:21:49.059 +37:59:50.85
Second-epoch image center 04:21:52.919 +38:01:11.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0257 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:21:52.321 +38:01:15.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:21:49.059 +37:59:50.85
Second-epoch image center 04:21:52.321 +38:01:15.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0258 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:21:52.919 +38:01:11.29
Second-epoch second image center 04:21:52.321 +38:01:15.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00229 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KmfUiI1UKV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ApraoAJW53
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ywQ2O6z0ve
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QDBDKbNyrh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits) and catalog (wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 137281 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.9471 to 76.3491 deg, Dec +32.1657 to +43.3179 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.9471 to 76.3491 deg, Dec 32.1657 to 43.3179 deg
Loaded 9244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5249 out of 7194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7194 out of 137281 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.846000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.846000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 137281 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.9471 to 76.3491 deg, Dec +32.1657 to +43.3179 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.9471 to 76.3491 deg, Dec 32.1657 to 43.3179 deg
Loaded 9244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5249 out of 7194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7194 out of 137281 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 140690 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.4527 to 75.8199 deg, Dec +31.9743 to +43.3811 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.4527 to 75.8199 deg, Dec 31.9743 to 43.3811 deg
Loaded 9291 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5356 out of 7280 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7280 out of 140690 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 151 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
1.9 pix Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
2.7 pix fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
2.6 pix fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
15.6 mag. Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KmfUiI1UKV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=15371, bad_region=12, passed=137258
Got 137258 stars (including 121586 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 137258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.241 n_q1=1433 n_q2=1266 n_q3=805 n_q4=1351 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ApraoAJW53 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=59, blended=14565, bad_region=4, passed=140631
Got 140631 stars (including 125769 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 140631 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4857 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits N_match=4857 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1235 n_q2=808 n_q3=1172 n_q4=1642 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ywQ2O6z0ve (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2121, bad_region=26, passed=48671
Got 48671 stars (including 46436 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48671 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48671 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48671 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48671 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4844 robust_rms=11.662 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.754 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4844 robust_rms=0.454 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.492 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4844 robust_rms=0.336 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.373 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4844 robust_rms_before=0.986 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.373 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.336 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.426 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.373
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.986 -> 0.336 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits is a symbolic link
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4844 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4668 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4668 pairs (4844 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4668 robust_rms=11.433 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.541 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4668 robust_rms=0.449 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.486 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4668 robust_rms=0.334 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.375 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4668 robust_rms_before=0.334 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.334 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.334 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.375 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.375
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-quadrant 0.375 vs 0.375 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4668 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48671 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4668 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48671 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits N_match=4668 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.388 n_q1=988 n_q2=500 n_q3=1588 n_q4=1592 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.182
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QDBDKbNyrh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1898, bad_region=29, passed=47198
Got 47198 stars (including 45202 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47198 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47198 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47198 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47198 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=11.683 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.711 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.452 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.499 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.330 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.377 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4855 robust_rms_before=0.332 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.363 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.330 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.376 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.377
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.376 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.435 n_q1=1335 n_q2=637 n_q3=1486 n_q4=1397 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.221
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-14-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-10_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_061617_TTUQ1b1x1_3012649_WLE3PyGC/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Per-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:43:40.25 +41:36:41.9: 13.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:43:40.25 +41:36:41.9: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:40.25 +41:36:41.9: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0804 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:41:22.71 +42:59:06.8: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:41:22.71 +42:59:06.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:22.71 +42:59:06.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:08:06.91 +43:12:46.3: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:08:06.91 +43:12:46.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:06.91 +43:12:46.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:50:43.05 +39:26:11.1: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:41:38.68 +38:44:53.7: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:30:18.80 +39:33:59.4: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:50:43.05 +39:26:11.1: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:43.05 +39:26:11.1: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8584 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:41:38.68 +38:44:53.7: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:38.68 +38:44:53.7: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0066 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:30:18.80 +39:33:59.4: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:18.80 +39:33:59.4: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9999 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:45:42.89 +36:26:44.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:24:58.66 +39:52:47.8: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:58:00.96 +41:20:15.8: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:45:42.89 +36:26:44.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:24:58.66 +39:52:47.8: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:58.66 +39:52:47.8: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5369 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:58:00.96 +41:20:15.8: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:58:58.11 +38:08:24.5: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:32:17.37 +37:46:34.9: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:58:58.11 +38:08:24.5: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:58:58.11 +38:08:24.5: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3123 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:32:17.37 +37:46:34.9: 14.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:32:17.37 +37:46:34.9: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1651 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:24:18.38 +38:39:49.8: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:59:26.88 +38:54:53.8: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:59:26.88 +38:54:53.8: 13.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:24:18.38 +38:39:49.8: 13.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:59:26.88 +38:54:53.8: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6287 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:18.38 +38:39:49.8: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6330 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:59:48.57 +38:33:33.3: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:59:48.57 +38:33:33.3: 14.52 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:59:48.57 +38:33:33.3: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5018 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:56:00.89 +40:01:42.3: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:55:39.16 +40:13:47.9: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:56:00.89 +40:01:42.3: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:56:00.89 +40:01:42.3: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2840 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:55:39.16 +40:13:47.9: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:55:39.16 +40:13:47.9: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3204 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:57:55.84 +37:20:13.6: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:00:06.03 +38:15:02.8: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:57:55.84 +37:20:13.6: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:55.84 +37:20:13.6: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1883 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:00:06.03 +38:15:02.8: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:00:06.03 +38:15:02.8: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1284 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:01:51.63 +37:10:43.4: 14.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:01:51.63 +37:10:43.4: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:01:51.63 +37:10:43.4: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1744 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out169792.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out169869.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53669.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56689.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out71324.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out75300.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78347.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79251.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81607.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88852.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168946_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 168946_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168959_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 168959_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:51.07 +41:45:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168965_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 168965_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168966_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 168966_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:12.22 +39:26:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168972_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 168972_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:23.54 +41:23:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168975_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 168975_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168978_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 168978_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168998_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 168998_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169005_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169005_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169009_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169009_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169041_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169041_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169045_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169045_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:12.10 +43:02:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169055_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169055_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169068_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169068_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169098_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169098_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169099_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169099_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169107_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169107_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169109_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169109_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169116_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169116_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169137_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169137_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169154_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169154_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:16.19 +39:38:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169157_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169157_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169162_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169162_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169179_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169179_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169197_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169197_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169201_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169201_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169215_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169215_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169229_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169229_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169280_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169280_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169284_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169284_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169295_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169295_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169302_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169302_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169309_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169309_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169329_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169329_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169338_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169338_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169340_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169340_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169341_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169341_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:34.90 +40:12:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169344_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169344_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:20.18 +43:10:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169357_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169357_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169372_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169372_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:44.14 +38:15:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169385_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169385_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169388_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169388_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:32.68 +42:14:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169389_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169389_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:19.00 +37:30:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169390_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169390_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169397_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169397_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:21.18 +40:02:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169403_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169403_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169415_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169415_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:41.72 +42:03:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169418_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169418_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:00.09 +40:05:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169421_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169421_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:11.22 +39:24:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169428_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169428_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169447_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169447_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169448_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169448_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169449_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169449_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:16.10 +43:01:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169456_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169456_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169463_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169463_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:04.74 +38:21:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169469_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169469_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169472_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169472_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:49.17 +42:09:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169474_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169474_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169482_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169482_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169485_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169485_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169490_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169490_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169492_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169492_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:37.74 +40:15:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169512_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169512_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169523_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169523_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:53.11 +40:56:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169525_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169525_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169538_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169538_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169553_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169553_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169579_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169579_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169586_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169586_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:57.64 +38:23:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169600_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169600_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:59.05 +42:36:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169614_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169614_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169621_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169621_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169626_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169626_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169634_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169634_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:20.92 +42:21:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169640_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169640_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169654_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169654_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169655_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169655_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169661_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169661_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169687_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169687_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169698_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169698_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169707_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169707_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169713_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169713_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169720_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169720_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169725_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169725_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169748_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169748_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169749_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169749_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169756_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169756_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169757_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169757_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169790_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169790_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169792_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
Preparing report for the candidate 169792_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169799_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169799_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169805_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169805_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169809_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169809_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169816_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169816_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169833_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169833_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169841_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169841_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169860_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169860_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169865_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169865_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169866_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169866_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169869_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
Preparing report for the candidate 169869_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169872_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169872_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169876_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169876_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169879_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169879_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169880_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169880_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169886_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169886_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169901_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169901_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169903_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169903_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:39.94 +34:18:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169904_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169904_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:52.15 +37:06:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169909_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169909_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169913_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169913_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169918_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169918_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169920_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169920_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169925_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 169925_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81607_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
Preparing report for the candidate 81607_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79251_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
Preparing report for the candidate 79251_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52541_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52541_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:00.76 +39:55:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116602_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 116602_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:30.87 +35:35:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126141_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 126141_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48153_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 48153_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:50.49 +40:09:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124797_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 124797_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:05.75 +36:06:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82395_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 82395_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:40.05 +37:18:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73749_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 73749_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71324_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
Preparing report for the candidate 71324_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77027_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 77027_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:27.39 +37:54:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23838_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 23838_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:15.71 +41:59:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73635_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 73635_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:36.58 +38:38:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54966_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 54966_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:54.00 +39:56:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93027_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 93027_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75300_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
Preparing report for the candidate 75300_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46559_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 46559_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115519_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 115519_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:40.60 +35:31:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126262_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 126262_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:07.14 +36:22:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56689_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
Preparing report for the candidate 56689_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47653_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 47653_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:15.88 +40:04:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53669_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
Preparing report for the candidate 53669_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90017_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 90017_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:37.46 +36:48:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127821_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 127821_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50084_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 50084_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:18.13 +39:58:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94341_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 94341_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:16.38 +33:02:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69831_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 69831_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:03.23 +39:04:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110356_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 110356_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78347_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
Preparing report for the candidate 78347_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86990_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 86990_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89545_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 89545_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02995_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 02995_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:50.94 +43:02:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89252_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 89252_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88852_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
Preparing report for the candidate 88852_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49984_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 49984_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101165_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 101165_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:24.62 +34:34:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93179_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 93179_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:19.11 +32:35:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135996_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 135996_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-10_06-15-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
