This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.3881 2461292.8881 13.13 07:00:57.79 +17:05:14.4
198.63418 9.74873 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.712 Boliviana 0 -0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:00:57.79 +17:05:14.4: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:00:57.79 +17:05:14.4: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.8881,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.3881 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.3881 2461292.8881 13.53 07:18:37.47 +13:27:15.0
203.83742 12.03613 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.444 Gyptis -0 -1 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:18:37.47 +13:27:15.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:18:37.47 +13:27:15.0: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.8881,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.3881 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.3881 2461292.8881 13.38 07:24:42.71 +17:54:02.2
200.31403 15.22917 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.114 Kassandra -0 -0 0 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:24:42.71 +17:54:02.2: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:24:42.71 +17:54:02.2: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.8881,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.3881 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461292.88836627 09.09.2026 09:19:04.846 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 17512
Objects passed selection criteria: 17469
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15375.2
Average stars matched: 14258.5 (92.7367 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 246460 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Sep 9 05:39:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461292.88836627 09.09.2026 09:19:04.846 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 158
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 61 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 133860
Objects passed selection criteria: 133551
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 120924
Average stars matched: 113110 (93.5387 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 621192 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Sep 9 05:40:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461292.88787152
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Image size: 940.9'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:48.919 +14:01:15.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:48.919 +14:01:15.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0319 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:46.265 +14:01:20.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:46.265 +14:01:20.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0237 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:48.919 +14:01:15.86
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:46.265 +14:01:20.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01080 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Wo3HwWQzyh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5k8BAxi9In
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.myGvijmdRF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Bsjw2Fetag
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.899900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.899900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec +8.5626 to +19.2813 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec 8.5626 to 19.2813 deg
Loaded 18669 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13893 out of 14989 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14989 out of 25465 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
14.9 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Wo3HwWQzyh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, bad_region=5272, passed=28861
Got 28861 stars (including 20681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5273)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=1616 n_q2=831 n_q3=1614 n_q4=730 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5k8BAxi9In (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, bad_region=6781, passed=25458
Got 25458 stars (including 16979 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4792 stars left (next iteration limit 5273)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4792 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.601 n_q1=1243 n_q2=1063 n_q3=1368 n_q4=1118 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.myGvijmdRF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=735, bad_region=1601, passed=11406
Got 11406 stars (including 9127 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11406 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4783 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 4780 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=5.315 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.231 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=0.742 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.841 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=0.586 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.684 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4780 robust_rms_before=1.549 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.583 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.586 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.684 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.684
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.684 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits N_match=4780 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.681 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.518 n_q1=1746 n_q2=698 n_q3=1649 n_q4=687 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Bsjw2Fetag (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=732, bad_region=1623, passed=11421
Got 11421 stars (including 9126 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11421 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4783 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5258)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=5.448 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.664 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.767 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.851 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.607 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.675 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4779 robust_rms_before=1.632 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.585 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.607 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.672 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.675
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.672 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.697 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.508 n_q1=1743 n_q2=704 n_q3=1645 n_q4=687 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.481 worst_q_ratio=1.171
ref2=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits sigma_overall=0.514 worst_q_ratio=1.169
new1=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits sigma_overall=0.591 worst_q_ratio=1.152
new2=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits sigma_overall=0.599 worst_q_ratio=1.163
reference average sigma_overall=0.4975 worst_q_ratio=1.17
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (4791 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034_astrometric_residuals.png (4792 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281_astrometric_residuals.png (4780 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282_astrometric_residuals.png (4779 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34454_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 34454_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.80 +10:45:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34457_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 34457_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:55.78 +12:58:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03781_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 03781_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.60 +10:01:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Image size: 940.9'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:48.919 +14:01:15.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:48.919 +14:01:15.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0319 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:46.265 +14:01:20.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:46.265 +14:01:20.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0237 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:48.919 +14:01:15.86
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:46.265 +14:01:20.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01080 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y4mlnDZjAa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QSedZufsgK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dLntrjthIt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VMZddhvxob
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.735100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.735100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec +8.5565 to +19.2859 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec 8.5565 to 19.2859 deg
Loaded 18692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11904 out of 16168 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16168 out of 174030 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 108 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.2 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.y4mlnDZjAa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=42, blended=33805, bad_region=29686, passed=208495
Got 208495 stars (including 147891 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4778 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4778 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1556 n_q2=875 n_q3=1578 n_q4=769 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QSedZufsgK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=45, blended=23358, bad_region=33384, passed=173985
Got 173985 stars (including 122046 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173985 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4777 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4777 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.586 n_q1=1276 n_q2=1027 n_q3=1377 n_q4=1097 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dLntrjthIt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=7296, bad_region=10058, passed=92839
Got 92839 stars (including 75801 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92839 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5260)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=5.481 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.388 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.734 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.831 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.586 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.682 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4779 robust_rms_before=1.578 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.574 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.586 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.659 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.682
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.659 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.675 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.502 n_q1=1765 n_q2=759 n_q3=1553 n_q4=702 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VMZddhvxob (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=7408, bad_region=10302, passed=94650
Got 94650 stars (including 77254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 94650 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4777 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4773 stars left (next iteration limit 5251)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=5.803 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.810 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.765 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.839 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.610 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.690 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4773 robust_rms_before=1.666 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.581 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.610 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.665 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.690
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.665 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits N_match=4773 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.689 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.497 n_q1=1755 n_q2=776 n_q3=1535 n_q4=707 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-18-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053643_TTUQ2b1x1_3061063_xgJpwJBj/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:15:37.35 +10:40:01.2: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:16.89 +16:50:38.0: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:46:20.94 +11:25:40.3: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:12:42.40 +10:51:01.0: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:45:50.46 +17:22:07.6: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:59:43.42 +13:30:08.2: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:19:45.61 +17:04:08.5: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:12:42.40 +10:51:01.0: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:16.89 +16:50:38.0: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:46:20.94 +11:25:40.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:15:37.35 +10:40:01.2: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:42.40 +10:51:01.0: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6144 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:20.94 +11:25:40.3: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7481 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:16.89 +16:50:38.0: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9122 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:37.35 +10:40:01.2: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6205 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:45:50.46 +17:22:07.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:59:43.42 +13:30:08.2: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:50.46 +17:22:07.6: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3862 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:43.42 +13:30:08.2: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5406 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:19:45.61 +17:04:08.5: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:45.61 +17:04:08.5: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2930 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:38:03.78 +16:58:07.5: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:59:29.15 +12:19:44.3: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:43:50.14 +14:45:51.0: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:38:03.78 +16:58:07.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:03.78 +16:58:07.5: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5361 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:55:11.72 +17:59:03.1: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:59:29.15 +12:19:44.3: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:43:50.14 +14:45:51.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:50.14 +14:45:51.0: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1523 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:29.15 +12:19:44.3: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2340 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:45:57.95 +16:15:03.5: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:50:27.60 +16:47:01.8: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:43:30.80 +16:35:59.7: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:39:35.85 +10:34:56.2: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:55:11.72 +17:59:03.1: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:11.72 +17:59:03.1: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0769 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:45:57.95 +16:15:03.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:57.95 +16:15:03.5: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3596 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:50:27.60 +16:47:01.8: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:43:47.55 +15:18:03.2: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:50:27.60 +16:47:01.8: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2075 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:39:35.85 +10:34:56.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:43:30.80 +16:35:59.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:35.85 +10:34:56.2: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0712 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:30.80 +16:35:59.7: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2105 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:20.37 +12:12:31.6: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:43:47.55 +15:18:03.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:47.55 +15:18:03.2: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8820 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:39:16.76 +16:10:09.9: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:20.37 +12:12:31.6: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:20.37 +12:12:31.6: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9954 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:39:16.76 +16:10:09.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:16.76 +16:10:09.9: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9225 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:20:02.07 +16:15:57.3: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:23:44.17 +16:43:42.1: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:42:26.71 +11:58:07.0: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:20:02.07 +16:15:57.3: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:02.07 +16:15:57.3: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3790 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:23:44.17 +16:43:42.1: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:44.17 +16:43:42.1: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9393 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:42:26.71 +11:58:07.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:26.71 +11:58:07.0: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9387 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:18:41.60 +12:25:14.5: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:41:13.63 +11:02:15.8: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:18:41.60 +12:25:14.5: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:41.60 +12:25:14.5: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6093 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:50:08.17 +09:58:56.2: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:41:13.63 +11:02:15.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:13.63 +11:02:15.8: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8068 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:50:08.17 +09:58:56.2: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:50:08.17 +09:58:56.2: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0556 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:00:57.79 +17:05:14.4: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:54.29 +10:46:22.8: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:13:58.05 +11:51:47.4: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:00:57.79 +17:05:14.4: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:54.29 +10:46:22.8: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:13:58.05 +11:51:47.4: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:54.29 +10:46:22.8: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1983 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:58.05 +11:51:47.4: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2094 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:05:28.36 +10:33:00.0: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:17:01.84 +14:07:47.5: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:05:28.36 +10:33:00.0: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:18:37.47 +13:27:15.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:17:01.84 +14:07:47.5: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:28.36 +10:33:00.0: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3950 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:24:42.71 +17:54:02.2: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:01.84 +14:07:47.5: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3451 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:22:44.86 +18:02:59.0: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:18:37.47 +13:27:15.0: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:24:42.71 +17:54:02.2: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:22:44.86 +18:02:59.0: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:22:44.86 +18:02:59.0: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6734 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:51.74 +15:02:54.9: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:51.74 +15:02:54.9: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:51.74 +15:02:54.9: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1871 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out249297.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out249373.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out249375.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248974_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 248974_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248976_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 248976_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:05.37 +11:20:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248978_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 248978_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:56.51 +12:08:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248981_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 248981_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:12.24 +12:44:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249001_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249001_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249005_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249005_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249012_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249012_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:50.55 +13:25:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249015_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249015_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249019_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249019_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:22.70 +17:52:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249023_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249023_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:07.61 +12:45:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249025_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249025_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249030_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249030_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:37.44 +10:51:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249037_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249037_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:37.58 +11:30:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249038_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249038_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249041_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249041_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:54.89 +17:46:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249042_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249042_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249045_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249045_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249049_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249049_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:47.94 +17:03:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249052_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249052_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:31.48 +10:59:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249055_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249055_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:18.68 +17:35:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249058_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249058_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249059_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249059_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249060_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249060_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:39.28 +10:38:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249061_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249061_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:49.04 +12:09:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249063_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249063_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:54.71 +10:24:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249065_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249065_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249072_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249072_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249077_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249077_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:37.81 +10:50:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249079_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249079_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249080_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249080_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:58.71 +16:31:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249091_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249091_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249094_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249094_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249101_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249101_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249105_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249105_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249109_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249109_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:05.71 +13:23:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249110_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249110_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:53.89 +12:32:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249115_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249115_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249116_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249116_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:32.25 +09:39:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249121_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249121_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:05.02 +14:59:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249126_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249126_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.65 +17:59:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249128_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249128_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249130_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249130_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:53.68 +11:05:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249132_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249132_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:39.68 +11:33:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249138_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249138_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:44.52 +10:01:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249142_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249142_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249145_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249145_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249151_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249151_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:47.65 +10:42:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249162_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249162_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:09.76 +16:09:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249164_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249164_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:40.75 +16:09:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249167_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249167_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:49.52 +09:53:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249175_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249175_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:25.66 +16:11:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249183_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249183_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:17.41 +10:38:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249185_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249185_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:14.06 +13:51:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249194_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249194_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:04.42 +09:51:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249204_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249204_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.05 +15:07:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249218_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249218_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:50.08 +12:33:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249220_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249220_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249224_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249224_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:29.13 +12:08:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249231_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249231_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:15.86 +09:43:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249232_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249232_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.54 +10:36:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249234_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249234_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249241_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249241_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:09.39 +14:14:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249243_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249243_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:38.55 +16:09:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249244_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249244_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:50.71 +16:55:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249245_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249245_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:47.01 +09:46:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249253_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249253_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249257_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249257_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:10.81 +17:50:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249259_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249259_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:31.48 +10:56:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249260_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249260_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:38.32 +10:55:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249266_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249266_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:19.42 +15:47:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249267_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249267_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:58.95 +12:40:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249268_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249268_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.16 +14:13:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249269_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249269_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:51.23 +12:40:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249272_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249272_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:54.03 +12:25:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249278_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249278_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:56.13 +12:40:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249286_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249286_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.54 +16:09:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249297_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
Preparing report for the candidate 249297_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249298_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249298_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249300_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249300_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:42.78 +10:43:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249308_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249308_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:55.49 +13:57:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249317_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249317_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249318_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249318_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:54.82 +15:11:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249320_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249320_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:30.17 +10:54:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249323_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249323_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:06.08 +11:00:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249327_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249327_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249345_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249345_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:11.90 +16:34:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249347_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249347_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:11.36 +16:01:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249348_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249348_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:25.32 +11:36:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249349_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249349_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249367_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249367_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:35.46 +15:19:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249372_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249372_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:16.26 +13:51:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249373_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
Preparing report for the candidate 249373_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249375_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
Preparing report for the candidate 249375_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249379_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249379_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:03.49 +12:18:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249391_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249391_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:25.34 +13:44:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249398_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249398_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249418_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249418_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:26.87 +14:38:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249424_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249424_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:00.96 +15:10:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249440_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 249440_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:42.53 +13:57:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89197_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 89197_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:55.89 +12:58:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131909_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 131909_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.50 +13:56:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23394_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 23394_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:16.52 +09:44:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228069_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 228069_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:29.81 +13:18:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26007_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 26007_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:57.31 +09:50:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190647_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 190647_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:33.45 +16:51:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62126_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 62126_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:08.68 +11:48:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282
The candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-09_04-19-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282 did not pass the final checks