This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4399 2461292.9399 11.47 04:53:14.76 +24:42:45.2
176.82843 -12.00941 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX23" Gaia DR3 3419734982066857088
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.780 G 10.800 G 1.494550000000 B
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 2 0 2 11.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:14.76 +24:42:45.2: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:14.76 +24:42:45.2: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4399* 04 53 14.76 +24 42 45.2 11.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3419734982066857088,2461292.9399,11.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3419734982066857088 20260909.4399 11.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4399* 04 13 42.36 +21 02 01.9 7.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9399,7.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4399 7.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4399* 04 13 42.36 +21 02 01.9 7.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9399,7.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4399 7.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4399 2461292.9399 12.59 04:41:58.64 +25:18:44.0
174.71747 -13.63439 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales 1 2 2 12.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:41:58.64 +25:18:44.0: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:41:58.64 +25:18:44.0: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4399* 04 41 58.64 +25 18 44.0 12.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9399,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4399 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4399 2461292.9399 13.55 04:35:35.07 +22:46:47.2
175.77828 -16.37176 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata -0 -0 0 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:35.07 +22:46:47.2: 16.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:35.07 +22:46:47.2: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4399* 04 35 35.07 +22 46 47.2 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9399,13.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4399 13.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4399 2461292.9399 13.62 04:53:57.31 +23:26:02.8
177.96740 -12.65947 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula -0 -0 0 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:57.31 +23:26:02.8: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:57.31 +23:26:02.8: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4399* 04 53 57.31 +23 26 02.8 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9399,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4399 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4399 2461292.9399 14.04 04:38:41.12 +20:04:39.8
178.44457 -17.51933 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.631 Philippina -0 -0 0 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:38:41.12 +20:04:39.8: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:38:41.12 +20:04:39.8: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4399* 04 38 41.12 +20 04 39.8 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9399,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4399 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4399 2461292.9399 14.19 04:18:18.61 +24:30:17.8
171.69106 -18.21488 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia -1 -0 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:18.61 +24:30:17.8: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:18.61 +24:30:17.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4399* 04 18 18.61 +24 30 17.8 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9399,14.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4399 14.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4399 2461292.9399 14.47 04:40:41.62 +25:11:50.9
174.61904 -13.93149 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.418 Alemannia -0 0 0 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:41.62 +25:11:50.9: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:41.62 +25:11:50.9: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4399* 04 40 41.62 +25 11 50.9 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9399,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4399 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4399 2461292.9399 14.73 04:08:33.50 +22:13:22.1
171.83570 -21.40822 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.162 Laurentia -0 -0 1 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:08:33.50 +22:13:22.1: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:08:33.50 +22:13:22.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4399* 04 08 33.50 +22 13 22.1 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9399,14.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4399 14.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4399 2461292.9399 14.92 04:07:14.71 +21:37:44.5
172.07262 -22.03820 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 10.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.341 California 1 -0 1 15.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:07:14.71 +21:37:44.5: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:07:14.71 +21:37:44.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4399* 04 07 14.71 +21 37 44.5 14.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9399,14.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4399 14.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.4399 2461292.9399 14.70 04:14:11.57 +17:33:44.1
176.52596 -23.57611 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1171 Rusthawelia -0 -2 2 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:14:11.57 +17:33:44.1: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:14:11.57 +17:33:44.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.4399* 04 14 11.57 +17 33 44.1 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.9399,14.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.4399 14.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461292.94036958 09.09.2026 10:33:57.932 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11554
Objects passed selection criteria: 11547
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11010.8
Average stars matched: 10795.2 (98.0428 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236884 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Sep 9 05:36:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461292.94036958 09.09.2026 10:33:57.932 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 155
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 34 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 80531
Objects passed selection criteria: 80405
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 75787.8
Average stars matched: 73679.8 (97.2185 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 553628 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Sep 9 05:37:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461292.93950955
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:42.389 +22:03:44.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:42.389 +22:03:44.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0867 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:45.447 +22:03:07.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:45.447 +22:03:07.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0712 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:42.389 +22:03:44.90
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:45.447 +22:03:07.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01578 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rHreOOhYIn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0LOqAluA8k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jL1WEHzUGa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ukn1i1AaKv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.997400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.997400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2796 deg
Loaded 5169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3956 out of 4300 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4300 out of 11076 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.rHreOOhYIn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, bad_region=0, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 10942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=1283 n_q2=1077 n_q3=1448 n_q4=1036 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0LOqAluA8k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=897, bad_region=0, passed=11076
Got 11076 stars (including 10166 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1273 n_q2=1107 n_q3=1409 n_q4=1055 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jL1WEHzUGa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=636, bad_region=0, passed=10664
Got 10664 stars (including 10009 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10664 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4839 stars left (next iteration limit 5321)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4839 robust_rms=13.151 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.398 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4839 robust_rms=0.398 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.430 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4839 robust_rms=0.274 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.312 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4839 robust_rms_before=1.129 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.304 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.274 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.332 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.312
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.332 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits N_match=4839 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=1065 n_q2=1385 n_q3=1075 n_q4=1314 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.080
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Ukn1i1AaKv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=657, bad_region=0, passed=10650
Got 10650 stars (including 9975 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10650 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10650 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10650 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10650 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4838 stars left (next iteration limit 5320)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4838 robust_rms=12.796 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.530 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4838 robust_rms=0.398 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.434 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4838 robust_rms=0.277 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.308 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4838 robust_rms_before=1.123 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.315 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.277 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.352 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.308
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:45.494 +22:03:06.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10650 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2945864.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.123 -> 0.277 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits N_match=4838 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1062 n_q2=1381 n_q3=1076 n_q4=1319 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.251
ref2=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.351 worst_q_ratio=1.297
new1=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.080
new2=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.180
reference average sigma_overall=0.3275 worst_q_ratio=1.274
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (4844 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (4844 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342_astrometric_residuals.png (4839 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343_astrometric_residuals.png (4838 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-32-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_053442_TTUQ1b1x1_2905830_5yISs3He/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:14.76 +24:42:45.2: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:36:23.42 +22:52:16.9: 12.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:00.00 +23:58:09.3: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:13.72 +21:11:51.0: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:32.66 +22:04:43.9: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:44.29 +21:57:42.9: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:56:35.26 +24:00:33.1: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:52.03 +22:50:30.1: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:06:06.13 +22:56:51.7: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:56:35.26 +24:00:33.1: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:13.72 +21:11:51.0: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:36:23.42 +22:52:16.9: 12.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:00.00 +23:58:09.3: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:14.76 +24:42:45.2: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:32.66 +22:04:43.9: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:52.03 +22:50:30.1: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:44.29 +21:57:42.9: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:35.26 +24:00:33.1: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5067 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:23.42 +22:52:16.9: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5573 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:13.72 +21:11:51.0: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4833 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:53:14.76 +24:42:45.2: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4645 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:00.00 +23:58:09.3: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5374 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:32.66 +22:04:43.9: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4975 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:44.29 +21:57:42.9: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4263 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:52.03 +22:50:30.1: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4268 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:06:06.13 +22:56:51.7: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:06:06.13 +22:56:51.7: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5980 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20365.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20365_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
Preparing report for the candidate 20365_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20367_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 20367_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.85 +24:18:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20369_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
Preparing report for the candidate 20369_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20551_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 20551_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20557_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 20557_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20570_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 20570_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20580_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 20580_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20587_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 20587_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20588_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 20588_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20593_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 20593_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20625_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 20625_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.43 +20:15:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 10554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101215_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101215_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101221_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101221_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101223_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101223_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101227_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101227_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101234_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101234_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101241_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101241_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101243_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101243_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:38.86 +18:06:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101244_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101244_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:09.04 +17:33:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101246_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101246_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101247_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101247_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101249_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101249_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101250_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101250_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101252_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101252_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101255_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101255_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:44.33 +25:22:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101257_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101257_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101259_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101259_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101261_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101261_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:31.48 +22:04:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101263_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101263_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:14.73 +24:42:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101264_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101264_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.83 +24:18:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101266_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
Preparing report for the candidate 101266_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101339_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101339_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.68 +19:10:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101479_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101479_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101496_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
Preparing report for the candidate 101496_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101535_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101535_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.79 +23:48:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101538_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101538_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:47.86 +18:26:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101544_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101544_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:29.15 +22:48:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101606_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101606_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101620_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101620_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:57.04 +23:57:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101656_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101656_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:45.29 +19:58:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101680_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101680_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:24.68 +22:56:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101706_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101706_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:24.30 +18:37:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101752_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101752_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:07.90 +21:31:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101777_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
Preparing report for the candidate 101777_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101780_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101780_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:52.97 +23:55:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101785_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101785_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101798_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101798_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:30.05 +21:45:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101828_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101828_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:16.59 +21:52:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101840_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101840_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:33.80 +25:48:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101860_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
Preparing report for the candidate 101860_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101861_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101861_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:14.45 +24:06:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101873_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101873_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:25.55 +18:42:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101876_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101876_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:08.39 +20:28:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101907_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101907_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.36 +24:25:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101918_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101918_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101943_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101943_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:47.32 +22:58:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101949_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101949_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:03.69 +20:29:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101980_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101980_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101999_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 101999_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102053_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102053_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102055_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102055_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:34.32 +17:20:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102056_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
Preparing report for the candidate 102056_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102081_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102081_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:12.05 +18:28:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102101_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
Preparing report for the candidate 102101_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102166_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102166_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:57.90 +21:03:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102171_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102171_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102197_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102197_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102198_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102198_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102200_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102200_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:40.42 +21:44:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102201_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102201_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102205_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102205_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102222_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102222_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102230_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102230_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102265_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102265_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102275_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102275_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102283_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102283_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102284_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102284_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102287_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102287_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:50.62 +23:37:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102300_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102300_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102304_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102304_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102306_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102306_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102308_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102308_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102318_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102318_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102355_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
Preparing report for the candidate 102355_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102363_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102363_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102369_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102369_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:28.71 +20:33:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102377_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102377_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102394_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102394_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102405_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102405_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102421_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102421_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102428_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102428_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102439_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102439_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102443_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102443_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102457_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102457_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102535_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102535_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102551_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102551_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:38.90 +23:58:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102552_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
Preparing report for the candidate 102552_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102572_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102572_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102574_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102574_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102575_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102575_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102668_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
Preparing report for the candidate 102668_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102679_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102679_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102685_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
Preparing report for the candidate 102685_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102701_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102701_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102703_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102703_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102709_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102709_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:49.12 +22:53:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102720_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102720_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102738_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102738_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102747_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102747_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102767_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102767_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102788_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102788_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102795_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102795_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102798_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102798_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102799_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102799_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102813_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102813_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102818_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102818_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102846_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102846_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102856_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102856_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102872_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102872_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102895_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102895_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102903_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102903_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102913_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102913_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102918_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102918_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102922_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102922_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102924_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102924_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:34.91 +20:26:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102935_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102935_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102943_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102943_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102950_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102950_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102951_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102951_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102967_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102967_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102974_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102974_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102984_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102984_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102994_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102994_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102997_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 102997_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103001_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 103001_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103003_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 103003_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103014_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 103014_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103050_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 103050_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103061_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 103061_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103073_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 103073_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103081_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 103081_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103090_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 103090_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103094_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 103094_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103097_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 103097_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103102_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 103102_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103109_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 103109_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103126_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 103126_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103131_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 103131_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103144_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 103144_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103150_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 103150_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103220_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 103220_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53022_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53022_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:39.86 +20:57:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20082_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 20082_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:55.43 +24:28:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.43 +20:16:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65103_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 65103_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_05-33-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
