NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-02-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.37790    2461292.87790    14.21    09:14:35.96 +58:52:04.8   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.29    09:14:36.15 +58:52:08.6   8053 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 09.3781  2461292.8781  14.25  09:14:36.05 +58:52:06.7
156.83814  41.25481 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 09:14:36.05 +58:52:06.7 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 09:14:36.05 +58:52:06.7:  16.02 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 09:14:36.05 +58:52:06.7:  16.07 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   UMa-02-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Reference image   2026 02 11.30384    2461082.80384    14.72    08:12:28.21 +62:36:23.1   6334 2910   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Discovery image 1   2026 02 11.30432    2461082.80432    14.71    08:12:28.34 +62:36:22.4   6337 2912   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37790    2461292.87790    12.85    08:12:28.30 +62:36:21.7   3302 3531   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Discovery image 3   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    12.81    08:12:28.29 +62:36:21.8   3302 3531   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 09.3781  2461292.8781  12.83  08:12:28.30 +62:36:21.7
153.96129  33.13676 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 0.7 pix   This object is listed in neverexclude_list.txt    0.7"  SU UMa - radio detected CV
The object was found in VSX
 1"  SU UMa                        
Type: UGSU
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    10.800   V            16.000   V                                0.076375400000   pec(UG)                      
The object was not found in astcheck.
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   UMa-02-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 2

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-02-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-02-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 412845 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 412845 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits_preview.png'
UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits

renamed 'UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits_preview.png'
UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 521.0909 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 558.9001 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1281.0641 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 502.4834 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1280.0108 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 503.0346 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.45843 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-09T04:04:00.5225278' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-09T09:04:00.5225278' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61292.3777838196 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-09T09:04:10.4270926' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61292.3778984607 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 128.567985718801 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 62.0001856657356 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 22.2386111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 29.1861111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.62686000922419 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 34 17' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 51.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.4 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 6.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits :) Spent 0.608920 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-09T04:04:42.6393100' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-09T09:04:42.6393100' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61292.3782712845 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-09T09:04:52.5394601' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61292.3783858679 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 128.567985631478 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 62.0001856923142 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 22.3108333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 29.2319444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.61890181104951 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 34 17' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 51.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.4 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 6.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits :) Spent 0.566462 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits


fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461292.87789956 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Image size: 942.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:33:41.305 +62:00:58.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81 Second-epoch image center 08:33:41.305 +62:00:58.69 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0764 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Image size: 942.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:33:41.830 +62:01:01.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81 Second-epoch image center 08:33:41.830 +62:01:01.56 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0756 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 08:33:41.305 +62:00:58.69 Second-epoch second image center 08:33:41.830 +62:01:01.56 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00130 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00130 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5VwYz7Ael8 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JUSKo7Iebu Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EyWz4puWQV Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rFGlt7aoAc Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec +55.4555 to +67.4100 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec 55.4555 to 67.4100 deg Loaded 8849 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5401 out of 5701 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5701 out of 9619 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.868000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.868000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec +55.4555 to +67.4100 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec 55.4555 to 67.4100 deg Loaded 8849 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5401 out of 5701 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5701 out of 9619 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 9596 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5413 deg, Dec +55.4555 to +67.4099 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5413 deg, Dec 55.4555 to 67.4099 deg Loaded 8848 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5383 out of 5695 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5695 out of 9596 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (aperture=6.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 2.2 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 2.7 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits 2.8 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 15.3 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 14.5 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits 14.5 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.5VwYz7Ael8 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=686, bad_region=0, passed=9619 Got 9619 stars (including 8917 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9619 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9619 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9619 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1045 n_q2=1423 n_q3=1046 n_q4=1382 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.433 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.JUSKo7Iebu (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=696, bad_region=0, passed=9596 Got 9596 stars (including 8884 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9596 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9596 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9596 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9596 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1037 n_q2=1434 n_q3=1042 n_q4=1388 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.387 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.EyWz4puWQV (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=295, bad_region=0, passed=6724 Got 6724 stars (including 6424 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6724 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013089 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010471 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6724 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6724 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6724 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=7.854 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.901 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.429 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.453 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.426 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4898 robust_rms_before=0.961 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.315 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.358 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.426 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.358 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1415 n_q2=929 n_q3=1522 n_q4=1032 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.rFGlt7aoAc (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=299, bad_region=0, passed=6691 Got 6691 stars (including 6385 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6691 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013089 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010471 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6691 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6691 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6691 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=7.805 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.991 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.427 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.457 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.422 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4896 robust_rms_before=0.946 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.311 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.358 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.422 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.358 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=1418 n_q2=921 n_q3=1528 n_q4=1029 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.433 ref2=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.387 new1=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.092 new2=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits sigma_overall=0.316 worst_q_ratio=1.138 reference average sigma_overall=0.359 worst_q_ratio=1.41 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303_astrometric_residuals.png (4901 matched stars from wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (4898 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20540_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 20540_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    11.42    07:45:42.62 +61:56:07.9   1390 3278   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 07:45:42.57 +61:56:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20566_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 20566_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    10.45    07:54:26.94 +65:18:53.6   2211 5241   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 07:54:26.92 +65:18:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20580_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 20580_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    10.81    08:30:26.62 +60:41:08.2   4592 2384   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 08:30:26.63 +60:41:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20624_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 20624_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    11.61    09:31:19.98 +63:02:37.4   8647 4466   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 09:31:19.99 +63:02:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 09362_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 09362_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    9.69    07:55:50.94 +57:11:56.0   1840 0337   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 07:55:50.97 +57:11:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Image size: 942.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:33:41.305 +62:00:58.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81 Second-epoch image center 08:33:41.305 +62:00:58.69 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0764 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Image size: 942.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:33:41.830 +62:01:01.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81 Second-epoch image center 08:33:41.830 +62:01:01.56 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0756 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 08:33:41.305 +62:00:58.69 Second-epoch second image center 08:33:41.830 +62:01:01.56 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00130 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00130 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aFZR00hSPs Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rCNy5sDJIP Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pgmLyBTIi5 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9Rst1e6uWp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 56661 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5794 deg, Dec +55.3287 to +67.4112 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5794 deg, Dec 55.3287 to 67.4112 deg Loaded 8955 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5034 out of 5776 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5776 out of 56661 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 56661 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5794 deg, Dec +55.3287 to +67.4112 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5794 deg, Dec 55.3287 to 67.4112 deg Loaded 8955 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5034 out of 5776 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5776 out of 56661 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 56645 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5789 deg, Dec +55.3459 to +67.4186 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5789 deg, Dec 55.3459 to 67.4186 deg Loaded 8948 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5045 out of 5770 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5770 out of 56645 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (aperture=4.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 111 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 2.0 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 2.7 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits 2.7 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 15.5 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 14.6 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits 14.6 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.aFZR00hSPs (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2986, bad_region=5, passed=56640 Got 56640 stars (including 53549 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56640 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=1040 n_q2=1417 n_q3=1035 n_q4=1400 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.408 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.rCNy5sDJIP (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2922, bad_region=5, passed=56624 Got 56624 stars (including 53603 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56624 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56624 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56624 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56624 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1040 n_q2=1423 n_q3=1040 n_q4=1391 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.345 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.pgmLyBTIi5 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1177, bad_region=21, passed=34522 Got 34522 stars (including 33280 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34522 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013089 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010471 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34522 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34522 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34522 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5376) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=7.755 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=18.542 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.450 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.423 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4888 robust_rms_before=0.958 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.312 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.355 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.423 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.355 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=1423 n_q2=914 n_q3=1532 n_q4=1019 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.9Rst1e6uWp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1197, bad_region=22, passed=34576 Got 34576 stars (including 33311 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34576 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013089 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010471 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34576 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34576 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34576 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5376) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=7.791 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.901 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.457 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.420 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4888 robust_rms_before=0.945 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.309 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.353 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.420 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.353 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1418 n_q2=906 n_q3=1538 n_q4=1026 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:48:49.05 +64:58:35.9: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:40:26.34 +60:23:12.7: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 07:48:49.05 +64:58:35.9: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 07:40:26.34 +60:23:12.7: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:26.34 +60:23:12.7: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5481 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:48:49.05 +64:58:35.9: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6282 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 08:09:30.73 +65:41:20.2: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 08:09:30.73 +65:41:20.2: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:09:30.73 +65:41:20.2: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7374 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:28:45.09 +63:53:53.1: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 08:23:24.22 +61:28:25.9: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 07:28:45.09 +63:53:53.1: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 09:12:40.02 +61:41:50.2: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:45.09 +63:53:53.1: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1928 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:47:56.92 +60:18:58.6: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 08:23:24.22 +61:28:25.9: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:23:24.22 +61:28:25.9: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4859 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 09:12:40.02 +61:41:50.2: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:12:40.02 +61:41:50.2: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3303 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 07:47:56.92 +60:18:58.6: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:47:56.92 +60:18:58.6: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6152 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 08:46:27.61 +64:56:56.6: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 08:46:27.61 +64:56:56.6: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:46:27.61 +64:56:56.6: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7853 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:27:14.06 +63:47:36.6: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 09:14:36.05 +58:52:06.7: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 07:27:14.06 +63:47:36.6: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:14.06 +63:47:36.6: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3707 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 09:14:36.05 +58:52:06.7: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out71551.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70715_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70715_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.24    07:50:28.03 +63:06:55.7   1809 3946   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 07:50:27.95 +63:06:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70720_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70720_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.93    07:30:36.49 +65:40:06.5   0747 5682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70725_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70725_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.37790    2461292.87790    13.64    07:48:48.93 +64:58:35.8   1832 5079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.62    07:48:49.18 +64:58:35.9   1831 5078   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70726_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70726_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.37790    2461292.87790    13.55    07:40:26.40 +60:23:13.9   0872 2403   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.55    07:40:26.29 +60:23:11.5   0871 2402   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70730_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70730_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    12.20    08:05:58.09 +58:12:48.4   2706 0899   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 08:05:58.12 +58:12:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70756_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70756_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    10.56    07:28:34.46 +61:32:42.4   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70768_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70768_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    10.74    08:18:31.09 +63:53:24.7   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70773_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70773_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    10.69    08:35:28.40 +57:39:44.5   5070 0580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70796_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70796_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    11.15    08:25:47.99 +59:48:00.1   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70798_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70798_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    11.37    08:08:40.02 +64:19:42.0   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70816_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70816_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    11.59    07:43:39.57 +59:48:58.2   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70820_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70820_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    11.35    09:21:09.63 +58:42:00.9   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70832_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70832_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    11.74    07:57:22.75 +58:18:50.5   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70839_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70839_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    11.83    09:10:57.34 +63:32:53.0   7221 4432   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 09:10:57.35 +63:32:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70840_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70840_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    11.83    08:44:27.87 +65:37:58.2   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70845_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70845_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    11.76    08:44:55.19 +59:26:13.8   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70867_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70867_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    12.16    07:46:12.96 +59:02:47.7   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70871_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70871_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    12.00    08:34:43.29 +59:11:52.7   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70877_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70877_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    12.05    08:31:50.54 +56:54:55.9   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70888_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70888_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    12.29    08:23:00.49 +64:56:46.8   4015 4935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70918_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70918_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    12.30    08:31:25.18 +67:05:18.4   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70975_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70975_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.37790    2461292.87790    12.75    08:09:30.76 +65:41:20.4   3171 5398   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    12.72    08:09:30.70 +65:41:20.0   3171 5398   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70994_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70994_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    12.66    08:34:47.12 +65:07:02.1   4760 5064   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 08:34:47.13 +65:07:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70999_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 70999_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    12.88    08:09:48.10 +65:39:11.2   3188 5375   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 08:09:48.09 +65:39:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71001_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71001_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    12.64    08:39:05.08 +59:57:55.6   5259 1988   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 08:39:05.06 +59:57:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71010_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71010_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    12.44    09:21:54.54 +57:35:25.3   8801 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71023_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71023_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.11    07:38:26.63 +66:15:24.1   1292 5945   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 07:38:26.53 +66:15:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71027_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71027_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    12.87    08:18:49.21 +58:40:38.9   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71028_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71028_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.11    07:42:07.16 +65:31:59.6   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71033_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71033_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    12.62    09:37:35.43 +62:44:02.0   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71044_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71044_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    12.60    08:50:13.59 +61:14:22.1   6005 2830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71054_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71054_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    12.95    07:41:08.61 +60:34:26.6   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71060_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71060_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    12.69    09:15:37.40 +58:26:18.2   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71062_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71062_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.04    08:19:39.24 +65:01:38.2   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71068_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71068_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    12.96    09:25:47.04 +55:56:26.5   9367 0177   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71073_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71073_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.37790    2461292.87790    13.25    07:28:45.06 +63:53:52.9   0420 4648   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.15    07:28:45.13 +63:53:53.2   0420 4648   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71095_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71095_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.15    07:26:19.99 +63:11:53.5   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71115_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71115_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.40    07:25:57.15 +64:01:35.0   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71125_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71125_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.33    07:28:06.79 +63:35:57.0   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71127_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71127_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.25    08:15:47.42 +60:21:15.7   3509 2169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 08:15:47.42 +60:21:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71137_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71137_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.39    07:53:34.68 +58:18:24.2   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71138_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71138_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.36    07:46:20.90 +56:50:51.9   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71150_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71150_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.63    07:23:57.12 +65:26:25.3   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71180_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71180_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.69    07:36:42.13 +61:45:51.1   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71182_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71182_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.56    07:31:43.39 +65:17:28.2   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71183_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71183_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.37790    2461292.87790    13.40    08:23:24.20 +61:28:25.7   4068 2844   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.62    08:23:24.25 +61:28:26.2   4068 2844   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71190_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71190_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.40    07:43:16.37 +58:06:18.0   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71204_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71204_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.54    07:41:23.99 +62:13:39.2   1110 3496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71216_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71216_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.29    08:40:42.39 +57:03:54.7   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71218_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71218_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.61    07:43:46.50 +60:12:14.1   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71233_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71233_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.37790    2461292.87790    13.38    09:12:40.00 +61:41:51.2   7559 3361   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.29    09:12:40.04 +61:41:49.1   7559 3360   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71236_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71236_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.58    07:30:14.64 +62:26:23.2   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71243_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71243_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.37790    2461292.87790    13.63    07:47:56.96 +60:18:58.6   1428 2285   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.60    07:47:56.87 +60:18:58.7   1427 2285   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71253_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71253_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.36    08:51:53.09 +58:08:35.9   6353 0989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 08:51:53.03 +58:08:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71254_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71254_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.73    07:56:47.40 +57:07:35.6   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71262_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71262_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.09    09:34:05.57 +61:17:03.4   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71270_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71270_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.43    07:46:40.95 +61:10:39.2   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71277_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71277_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.76    07:54:04.29 +66:54:45.8   2283 6211   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71291_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71291_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.66    08:43:12.05 +65:53:20.0   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71298_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71298_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.29    09:30:08.15 +59:23:54.3   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71300_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71300_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.49    08:12:08.68 +57:58:33.3   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71302_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71302_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.43    08:09:29.53 +58:18:36.6   2989 0946   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 08:09:29.50 +58:18:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71321_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71321_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.48    07:33:23.89 +59:50:26.0   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71322_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71322_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.50    09:42:34.76 +65:28:06.6   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71325_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71325_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.79    07:29:21.25 +61:39:08.3   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71326_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71326_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.83    07:48:25.66 +65:51:40.0   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71332_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71332_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.37790    2461292.87790    13.78    08:46:27.52 +64:56:56.6   5508 5024   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.79    08:46:27.71 +64:56:56.6   5507 5023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71346_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71346_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.60    08:27:45.78 +62:23:27.6   4364 3402   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 08:27:45.78 +62:23:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71355_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71355_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.84    08:14:42.69 +62:01:25.1   3450 3176   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 08:14:42.38 +62:01:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71361_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71361_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.08    07:32:03.33 +59:32:07.9   0147 1995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71363_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71363_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.69    08:09:10.02 +66:04:36.8   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71372_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71372_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.98    07:35:22.76 +58:29:47.4   0292 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71380_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71380_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.67    08:23:10.14 +61:12:48.3   4053 2687   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 08:23:10.02 +61:12:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71385_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71385_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.12    07:34:42.67 +63:55:43.5   0819 4590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71391_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71391_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.69    09:35:47.45 +62:15:53.3   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71396_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71396_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.86    09:45:42.79 +65:09:42.2   9185 5990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71399_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71399_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.88    08:03:20.20 +66:51:02.2   2831 6124   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71401_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71401_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.66    09:06:40.00 +58:47:07.9   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71403_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71403_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.97    07:35:54.77 +66:42:38.0   1184 6246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71406_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71406_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.24    07:48:18.71 +64:42:11.9   1779 4918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71410_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71410_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.74    07:42:37.52 +58:36:30.3   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71431_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71431_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.81    07:46:42.06 +58:18:20.9   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71443_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71443_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.31    07:38:57.57 +65:05:27.7   1212 5239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71450_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71450_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.30    08:11:21.99 +66:29:40.9   3302 5882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71467_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71467_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.86    07:40:27.86 +58:39:36.0   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71473_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71473_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.87    09:33:11.64 +61:03:01.2   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71483_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71483_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.41    07:41:13.79 +57:55:56.4   0704 0915   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71495_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71495_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.06    08:42:37.60 +57:05:11.6   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71498_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71498_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.56    08:38:37.89 +64:51:23.7   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71507_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71507_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.08    09:06:48.77 +59:10:23.3   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71510_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71510_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.82    09:48:39.89 +65:13:32.0   9353 6092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71511_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71511_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.14    09:22:54.11 +62:26:04.7   8171 3957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71524_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71524_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.07    08:20:52.74 +61:08:01.0   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71526_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71526_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.05    09:00:42.13 +66:40:36.5   6247 6179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71530_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71530_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.23    08:43:07.41 +59:20:42.6   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71539_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71539_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.15    09:31:03.61 +65:23:49.2   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71542_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71542_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.63    08:05:20.36 +63:50:48.7   2849 4299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71543_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71543_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    13.98    09:16:14.91 +57:56:35.0   8302 1192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71548_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71548_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 09.37790    2461292.87790    14.56    07:27:13.83 +63:47:36.6   0306 4606   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.27    07:27:14.29 +63:47:36.6   0306 4606   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71549_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71549_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.52    07:46:04.13 +62:41:08.2   1475 3725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71551_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 Preparing report for the candidate 71551_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71553_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71553_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.59    08:17:39.68 +57:09:31.9   3630 0234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71558_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71558_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.26    07:43:13.82 +65:58:20.4   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71559_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71559_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.46    07:34:40.95 +65:09:00.9   0946 5322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71560_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71560_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.33    08:13:33.55 +60:16:33.6   3342 2125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71563_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71563_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.21    09:21:44.84 +62:38:16.1   8063 4057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71569_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 71569_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    14.57    07:43:42.35 +60:03:16.4   1087 2168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 26033_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 Preparing report for the candidate 26033_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 10578_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 10578_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    10.64    07:54:26.95 +65:18:53.5   2211 5241   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 07:54:26.94 +65:18:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 17952_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 17952_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    10.99    09:36:44.16 +62:17:18.7   9142 4134   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 09:36:44.20 +62:17:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36104_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 The candidate 36104_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 09.37839    2461292.87839    9.77    07:55:50.95 +57:11:56.1   1840 0337   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits **** FOUND 07:55:50.97 +57:11:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 21s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 09:14:36.05 +58:52:06.7 Source monitoring: measuring positions from /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-09-09_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_040600_TTUQ1b1x1_100535_k6scrbQ8/monitoring_positions.txt Read 34529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.2011 to 148.3249 deg, Dec +55.6815 to +67.3379 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.2011 to 148.3249 deg, Dec 55.6815 to 67.3379 deg Loaded 8703 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5422 out of 5732 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5732 out of 34529 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits via Tycho-2 util/pixel_flux_airmass_correction processing wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Observation time (mid-exposure, UTC): JD 2461292.87790 (FITS header) Observing site: lat= +33.748056 deg lon= -101.958333 deg east-positive (SITELAT/SITELONG FITS header keywords) Frame center (pixel 4788.5 3194.5): RA= 128.42024 deg Dec= +62.01552 deg Frame center: alt= +22.561 deg az= 33.965 deg airmass= 2.5865 Header cross-check: CENTALT= 22.239 deg (difference +0.323 deg) Header cross-check: AIRMASS= 2.6269 (we compute 2.5865) Airmass zero-point fit: OK k= +0.3088 +/- 0.0053 mag/airmass N= 4089 airmass span 1.8909-4.2116 scatter 0.1652 mag Source monitoring: airmass zero-point for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits: OK +0.804896 -0.308845 2.5865 +0.3088 4089 2.3207 0.1652 1.8909 4.2116 Forced photometry (list mode): image=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits list=monitoring_pixlist225484.tmp aperture=5.6 Image size: 9576 x 6388 Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Saturation level: 57000.0 Calibration (from calib.txt_param_monitoring, fit_function=3): cal_mag = 0.000000 * x^2 + 1.000000 * x + 22.403900 Forced photometry: center=(3302.22, 3531.01) aperture=5.6 Annulus: inner=11.20 outer=28.00 Background annulus: 2068 pixels Iterative clipping converged after 3 iterations, 2052/2068 pixels remain SExtractor background: mode=737.08 median=739.00 mean=740.28 sigma=39.82 -> bg=737.08 (2052 pixels) Aperture sum=24414.55 N_eff=24.6301 Net flux=6260.11 noise=197.61 SNR=31.68 Instrumental magnitude: -9.4915 Calibrated magnitude: 12.9124 Source monitoring: airmass zero-point term applied to the measurements on wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits Source monitoring: 1 position(s) measured on wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits (aperture 5.6 pix) Read 34581 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.2012 to 148.3254 deg, Dec +55.6811 to +67.3384 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.2012 to 148.3254 deg, Dec 55.6811 to 67.3384 deg Loaded 8703 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5407 out of 5739 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5739 out of 34581 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits via Tycho-2 util/pixel_flux_airmass_correction processing wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Observation time (mid-exposure, UTC): JD 2461292.87839 (FITS header) Observing site: lat= +33.748056 deg lon= -101.958333 deg east-positive (SITELAT/SITELONG FITS header keywords) Frame center (pixel 4788.5 3194.5): RA= 128.42243 deg Dec= +62.01632 deg Frame center: alt= +22.632 deg az= 34.012 deg airmass= 2.5789 Header cross-check: CENTALT= 22.311 deg (difference +0.321 deg) Header cross-check: AIRMASS= 2.6189 (we compute 2.5789) Airmass zero-point fit: OK k= +0.3185 +/- 0.0056 mag/airmass N= 4067 airmass span 1.8873-4.1903 scatter 0.1693 mag Source monitoring: airmass zero-point for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits: OK +0.824107 -0.318499 2.5789 +0.3185 4067 2.3030 0.1693 1.8873 4.1903 Forced photometry (list mode): image=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits list=monitoring_pixlist225484.tmp aperture=5.6 Image size: 9576 x 6388 Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Saturation level: 57000.0 Calibration (from calib.txt_param_monitoring, fit_function=3): cal_mag = 0.000000 * x^2 + 1.000000 * x + 22.406900 Forced photometry: center=(3301.63, 3530.54) aperture=5.6 Annulus: inner=11.20 outer=28.00 Background annulus: 2074 pixels Iterative clipping converged after 3 iterations, 2053/2074 pixels remain SExtractor background: mode=734.99 median=738.00 mean=740.01 sigma=38.34 -> bg=734.99 (2053 pixels) Aperture sum=24523.86 N_eff=24.6301 Net flux=6421.05 noise=190.25 SNR=33.75 Instrumental magnitude: -9.5190 Calibrated magnitude: 12.8879 Source monitoring: airmass zero-point term applied to the measurements on wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits Source monitoring: 1 position(s) measured on wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_04-04-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits (aperture 5.6 pix) ########### Completed UMa-02-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 09:14:36.05 +58:52:06.7 08:12:28.30 +62:36:21.7 ################################################################################### 09:14:36.05 +58:52:06.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) 08:12:28.30 +62:36:21.7 -- listed in neverexclude_list.txt (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 09:14:36.05 +58:52:06.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 09:14:36.05 +58:52:06.7 -- not a known variable star Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 09:14:36.05 +58:52:06.7 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461292.87789956 -observatory V36 11:51:51.86 +01:50:01.9 Mercury (-0.7mag) 13:41:12.10 -15:17:33.5 Venus (-4.7mag) 07:19:35.71 +22:50:38.3 Mars (1.2mag) 09:10:45.48 +16:50:18.7 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:51:14.73 +02:35:11.2 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:42.40 +21:02:02.5 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:13:32.91 -00:04:33.8 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:25:27.15 -23:40:05.0 Pluto (14.5mag) 09:46:38.62 +13:35:21.6 Moon (-8.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Sep 9 04:09 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461292.87789956: 09:10:42.53 +16:50:33.9 Io (6.2mag) 09:10:55.33 +16:49:30.3 Europa (6.3mag) 09:10:31.50 +16:51:29.2 Ganymede (5.7mag) 09:10:35.50 +16:51:09.9 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:08:36.07 +17:07:45.0 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:10:49.46 +16:50:00.6 Thebe (16.6mag) 09:08:11.97 +17:01:39.3 Elara (17.7mag) 09:14:36.07 +16:17:16.7 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:11:41.48 +17:08:39.7 Carme (19.0mag) 00:51:02.34 +02:35:26.4 Titan (8.3mag) 00:51:19.25 +02:34:59.9 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:51:24.25 +02:37:30.1 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:51:30.59 +02:34:55.3 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:49:59.33 +02:24:44.0 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 9 04:09 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461292.87789956: 22:20:39.00 +03:08:22.5 JWST 16:38:51.12 +44:19:05.6 Chandra 11:53:02.00 -61:16:02.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 9 04:09 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461292.87789956 -observatory V36 03:41:37.03 +19:26:04.8 17.4mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:03:40.61 -34:10:20.6 14.4mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:21:01.99 -70:25:02.8 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:55.20 +33:45:16.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 22:11:50.13 +28:24:51.7 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:11:44.90 +25:56:26.7 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:51:24.91 +27:09:07.4 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:49:59.32 +05:13:17.7 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:28:59.98 -15:49:54.2 14.9mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:40:12.06 +33:01:19.5 15.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:06:52.26 +15:17:56.3 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:32:20.61 +43:05:36.2 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:23:20.81 +49:11:08.8 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:36:41.82 -13:03:19.9 15.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:12:19.62 +18:07:31.9 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:21:20.67 +18:36:22.9 16.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:21:20.91 -00:03:07.0 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:46:56.51 +73:41:09.8 16.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:04:43.48 +46:03:58.3 17.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:15:12.24 +11:27:11.6 17.5mag A/2026 E1 22:27:43.48 -35:09:34.0 7.8mag 10P/Tempel 11:49:33.99 -05:37:29.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:12:45.73 -05:45:07.6 17.6mag 63P/Wild 06:43:20.25 +19:05:28.8 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:16:08.73 -26:11:36.8 17.1mag 84P/Giclas 03:17:20.46 +15:01:17.1 17.2mag 88P/Howell 05:45:09.99 +29:25:27.8 16.9mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 07:37:57.29 +24:16:40.2 15.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:32:32.06 +20:25:30.2 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:51:11.67 -22:03:40.9 17.5mag 124P/Mrkos 06:19:55.16 +20:34:26.4 15.9mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:23:43.89 -17:20:41.5 11.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 08:58:39.77 +37:31:50.4 16.4mag 162P/Siding Spring 09:34:28.94 +12:28:36.7 13.2mag 169P/NEAT 03:26:07.23 +08:17:59.4 17.7mag 220P/McNaught 04:53:39.53 +36:58:03.8 15.2mag 260P/McNaught 08:37:26.40 +35:28:40.2 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:26:35.92 -00:28:57.2 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:29:34.73 +16:44:38.7 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 9 04:09 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 9 04:09 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 9 04:09 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 01:16:59.610 +05:02:09.95 AT 2026yux 2026-08-06.84 22.17 01:03:17.160 +01:55:16.75 AT 2026yuw 2026-08-06.84 21.78 01:01:06.200 -01:23:37.06 AT 2026yuv 2026-08-06.84 21.44 23:00:49.110 +05:32:39.05 AT 2026yuu 2026-08-07.78 22.37 23:39:57.990 +03:21:50.80 AT 2026yut 2026-08-06.76 22.1 23:34:24.590 +00:59:42.41 AT 2026yus 2026-08-05.79 22.26 23:11:22.440 +03:34:45.08 AT 2026yur 2026-08-06.81 22.15 23:52:10.400 +03:53:48.67 AT 2026yuq 2026-08-06.76 22.26 01:28:25.390 -00:33:31.00 AT 2026yup 2026-07-22.87 22.24 06:19:46.733 +50:57:31.05 AT 2026yuo 2026-08-13.50 19.744 23:24:50.114 +15:25:58.38 AT 2026yun 2026-08-10.05 19.96 00:25:27.120 +20:14:05.91 SN 2026yum 2026-08-13.09 18.04 22:02:49.666 -13:05:30.39 AT 2026yul 2026-08-12.92 18.89 21:45:50.911 -04:08:31.57 AT 2026yuk 2026-08-12.78 19.08 01:02:47.624 -06:59:05.24 AT 2026yuj 2026-08-13.05 19.25 23:50:13.455 +20:53:14.83 AT 2026yui 2026-08-12.94 19.46 22:53:22.575 -18:00:52.62 AT 2026yuh 2026-08-12.37 19.1729 01:03:55.125 -10:40:35.60 AT 2026yug 2026-08-10.42 20.3834 22:18:45.584 -09:23:49.69 AT 2026yuf 2026-08-08.36 20.7186 20:49:39.970 +17:00:06.86 AT 2026yue 2026-08-10.93 20.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Sep 9 04:09 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 94 C