This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.3304 2461292.8304 11.44 00:03:19.09 -06:51:56.3
91.33377 -66.73823 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.106 Dione -0 0 1 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:03:19.09 -06:51:56.3: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:03:19.09 -06:51:56.3: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.3304* 00 03 19.09 -06 51 56.3 11.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.8304,11.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.3304 11.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.3304 2461292.8304 11.99 23:31:17.11 -09:32:08.0
72.07405 -64.17091 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.113 Amalthea 0 0 0 11.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:17.11 -09:32:08.0: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:17.11 -09:32:08.0: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.8304,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.3304 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.3304 2461292.8304 11.91 23:52:46.89 -13:04:44.0
75.72564 -70.36442 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.118 Peitho -0 -0 0 12.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:46.89 -13:04:44.0: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:46.89 -13:04:44.0: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.8304,11.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.3304 11.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.3304 2461292.8304 12.58 23:30:43.94 -12:48:29.6
66.12773 -66.30167 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.530 Turandot -0 -0 0 12.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:30:43.94 -12:48:29.6: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:30:43.94 -12:48:29.6: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.8304,12.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.3304 12.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.3304 2461292.8304 13.65 00:15:07.74 -10:27:02.1
94.05951 -71.25775 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1133 Lugduna -0 0 1 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:15:07.74 -10:27:02.1: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:15:07.74 -10:27:02.1: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.3304* 00 15 07.74 -10 27 02.1 13.7 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.8304,13.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.3304 13.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.3304 2461292.8304 14.06 23:36:57.94 -05:37:12.0
80.11335 -62.13038 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.981 Martina -1 0 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:36:57.94 -05:37:12.0: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:36:57.94 -05:37:12.0: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.8304,14.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.3304 14.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.3304 2461292.8304 14.29 23:34:22.67 -13:40:44.0
65.88024 -67.54088 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.722 Frieda -1 -1 1 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:34:22.67 -13:40:44.0: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:34:22.67 -13:40:44.0: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.8304,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.3304 14.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last image: 2461292.83075484 09.09.2026 07:56:07.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4722
Objects passed selection criteria: 4717
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4483.5
Average stars matched: 4281.25 (95.489 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231172 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Sep 9 03:00:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last image: 2461292.83075484 09.09.2026 07:56:07.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 69
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27059
Objects passed selection criteria: 26964
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 25085
Average stars matched: 22957 (91.5168 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249256 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Sep 9 03:01:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461292.83010563
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:49.663 -10:00:37.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 23:59:49.663 -10:00:37.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0450 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:50.303 -10:01:16.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 23:59:50.303 -10:01:16.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0459 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:49.663 -10:00:37.17
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:50.303 -10:01:16.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01119 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fkxR1SjfRi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kX5ZdgS2Oq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fxYMuYI3p5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fZ1KpcKZBW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.569700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.569700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.1)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
2.3 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
14.7 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.fkxR1SjfRi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=0, passed=4374
Got 4374 stars (including 4092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0777, gap 8.0777 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 3991 stars left (next iteration limit 4390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3991 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1080 n_q2=969 n_q3=999 n_q4=943 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kX5ZdgS2Oq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=0, passed=4358
Got 4358 stars (including 4088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0776, gap 8.0776 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 3988 stars left (next iteration limit 4386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3988 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1022 n_q2=971 n_q3=1079 n_q4=916 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fxYMuYI3p5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, bad_region=0, passed=4738
Got 4738 stars (including 4373 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4738 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6379 through 0 to 8.0951, gap 8.0951 to 351.6379
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4261 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4257 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4257 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6375 through 0 to 8.0953, gap 8.0953 to 351.6375
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4261 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4258 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4258 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4258 stars left (next iteration limit 4682)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4258 robust_rms=12.257 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.434 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4258 robust_rms=0.442 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.496 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4258 robust_rms=0.304 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.349 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4258 robust_rms_before=1.104 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.303 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.304 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.337 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.349
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.337 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits N_match=4258 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=961 n_q2=1092 n_q3=1069 n_q4=1136 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fZ1KpcKZBW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=372, bad_region=1, passed=4671
Got 4671 stars (including 4295 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4671 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6380 through 0 to 8.0951, gap 8.0951 to 351.6380
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4189 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4187 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4187 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4671 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6376 through 0 to 8.0953, gap 8.0953 to 351.6376
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4190 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4188 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4671 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4188 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4671 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4188 stars left (next iteration limit 4605)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4188 robust_rms=12.240 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.393 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4188 robust_rms=0.473 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.522 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4188 robust_rms=0.325 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.368 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4188 robust_rms_before=1.131 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.329 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.325 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.369 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.368
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.369 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits N_match=4188 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=955 n_q2=1072 n_q3=1043 n_q4=1118 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.109
ref2=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.078
new1=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits sigma_overall=0.310 worst_q_ratio=1.145
new2=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits sigma_overall=0.337 worst_q_ratio=1.114
reference average sigma_overall=0.3205 worst_q_ratio=1.0935
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3991 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3988 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192_astrometric_residuals.png (4258 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193_astrometric_residuals.png (4188 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:03:19.09 -06:51:56.3: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:31:00.10 -10:29:06.1: 11.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:03:19.09 -06:51:56.3: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:31:00.10 -10:29:06.1: 11.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:00.10 -10:29:06.1: ref_mag=11.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2583 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20300.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20229_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 20229_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20257_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 20257_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:19:24.42 -08:51:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20295_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 20295_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:11:24.81 -11:28:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20300_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 20300_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00255_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 00255_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:02:07.44 -14:40:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03145_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 03145_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:13:45.96 -07:48:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:03:19.09 -06:51:56.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:49.663 -10:00:37.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 23:59:49.663 -10:00:37.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0450 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:50.303 -10:01:16.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 23:59:50.303 -10:01:16.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0459 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:49.663 -10:00:37.17
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:50.303 -10:01:16.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01119 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KtuiAbmfk3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kYl3KCKR2D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OaJU1moqqe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CrM9y27Z2A
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.388800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.388800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.3)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 66 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
2.2 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
1.9 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
14.9 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KtuiAbmfk3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=913, bad_region=0, passed=22729
Got 22729 stars (including 21779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22729 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0982, gap 8.0982 to 351.9463
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5350)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1176 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kYl3KCKR2D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=0, passed=23408
Got 23408 stars (including 22542 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0899, gap 8.0899 to 351.9465
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1259 n_q2=1185 n_q3=1245 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OaJU1moqqe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=932, bad_region=13, passed=27419
Got 27419 stars (including 26428 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5342 through 0 to 8.1376, gap 8.1376 to 351.5342
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5338 through 0 to 8.1379, gap 8.1379 to 351.5338
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4861 stars left (next iteration limit 5347)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=11.467 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.086 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=0.446 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.494 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=0.307 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.349 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4861 robust_rms_before=1.104 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.303 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.307 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.341 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.349
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.341 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits N_match=4861 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=1200 n_q2=1274 n_q3=1171 n_q4=1216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CrM9y27Z2A (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=964, bad_region=18, passed=27672
Got 27672 stars (including 26641 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27672 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5343 through 0 to 8.1373, gap 8.1373 to 351.5343
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27672 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5339 through 0 to 8.1376, gap 8.1376 to 351.5339
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27672 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27672 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4861 stars left (next iteration limit 5347)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=11.507 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.042 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=0.470 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.505 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=0.326 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.367 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4861 robust_rms_before=1.137 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.322 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.326 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.368 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.367
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.368 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits N_match=4861 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=1196 n_q2=1282 n_q3=1166 n_q4=1217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-55-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_025758_TTUQ1b1x1_2124297_eNneimzK/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:42:24.52 -06:00:20.3: 13.58 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:06:28.95 -13:25:12.9: 13.69 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:37:58.01 -14:09:54.1: 14.26 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:40.36 -06:46:25.3: 14.12 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:09.55 -08:03:52.3: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:39:00.30 -09:16:51.8: 13.65 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:29:11.46 -10:39:16.5: 13.95 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:08:45.40 -06:28:01.4: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:59:49.63 -08:31:19.4: 13.54 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:13:02.67 -05:59:51.8: 13.83 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:09.55 -08:03:52.3: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:42:24.52 -06:00:20.3: 13.81 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:08:45.40 -06:28:01.4: 14.05 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:59:49.63 -08:31:19.4: 13.78 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:06:28.95 -13:25:12.9: 13.99 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:40.36 -06:46:25.3: 13.99 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:29:11.46 -10:39:16.5: 14.44 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:37:58.01 -14:09:54.1: 14.32 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:13:02.67 -05:59:51.8: 13.97 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:39:00.30 -09:16:51.8: 13.49 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:09.55 -08:03:52.3: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3927 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:08:45.40 -06:28:01.4: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2404 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:49.63 -08:31:19.4: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2055 delta=-0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:42:24.52 -06:00:20.3: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2660 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:28.95 -13:25:12.9: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1784 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:40.36 -06:46:25.3: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2604 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:02.67 -05:59:51.8: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3147 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:11.46 -10:39:16.5: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3057 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:58.01 -14:09:54.1: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2429 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:00.30 -09:16:51.8: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1459 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:17.11 -09:32:08.0: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:26:57.58 -14:40:52.3: 13.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:30:38.20 -11:27:40.1: 13.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:36.24 -07:55:56.9: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:54:45.82 -08:55:58.1: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:47.12 -09:24:31.4: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:46.89 -13:04:44.0: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:30:43.94 -12:48:29.6: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:06.68 -07:36:48.4: 12.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:59:45.78 -05:52:34.6: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:47.12 -09:24:31.4: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:26:57.58 -14:40:52.3: 13.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:36.24 -07:55:56.9: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:30:38.20 -11:27:40.1: 13.51 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:46.89 -13:04:44.0: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:17.11 -09:32:08.0: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:54:45.82 -08:55:58.1: 13.48 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:47.12 -09:24:31.4: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0378 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:57.58 -14:40:52.3: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1910 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:36.24 -07:55:56.9: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6083 delta=-0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:38.20 -11:27:40.1: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8575 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:45.82 -08:55:58.1: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0986 delta=-0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:06.68 -07:36:48.4: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:30:43.94 -12:48:29.6: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:06.68 -07:36:48.4: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3002 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:59:45.78 -05:52:34.6: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:45.78 -05:52:34.6: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5903 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:48.93 -06:31:08.0: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:51:01.60 -05:38:20.7: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:29:34.46 -05:21:34.7: 13.72 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:36:57.94 -05:37:12.0: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:15:07.74 -10:27:02.1: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:36.08 -10:20:03.6: 13.93 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:47.28 -09:01:10.5: 13.68 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:48.93 -06:31:08.0: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:29:34.46 -05:21:34.7: 13.60 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:51:01.60 -05:38:20.7: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:36:57.94 -05:37:12.0: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:48.93 -06:31:08.0: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4196 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:34.46 -05:21:34.7: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8924 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:01.60 -05:38:20.7: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4599 delta=-0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:15:07.74 -10:27:02.1: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:36.08 -10:20:03.6: 13.98 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:36.08 -10:20:03.6: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9622 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:47.28 -09:01:10.5: 13.83 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:47.28 -09:01:10.5: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9688 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:18.81 -09:31:11.5: 13.88 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:35:14.21 -04:49:07.8: 14.45 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:09:28.87 -08:29:47.7: 13.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:29:59.07 -14:20:26.4: 14.26 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:35:14.21 -04:49:07.8: 14.35 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:18.81 -09:31:11.5: 13.80 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:09:28.87 -08:29:47.7: 13.98 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:35.64 -10:30:36.9: 14.43 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:14.21 -04:49:07.8: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3615 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:18.81 -09:31:11.5: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0128 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:09:28.87 -08:29:47.7: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1379 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:29:59.07 -14:20:26.4: 14.28 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:35.64 -10:30:36.9: 14.20 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:59.07 -14:20:26.4: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9518 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:35.64 -10:30:36.9: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2401 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:29:12.59 -09:31:32.5: 14.21 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:37:31.92 -10:47:04.5: 14.68 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:35:58.33 -08:47:07.2: 13.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:35:58.33 -08:47:07.2: 13.55 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:29:12.59 -09:31:32.5: 14.14 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:58.33 -08:47:07.2: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1991 delta=-0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:12.59 -09:31:32.5: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2340 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:57.63 -06:43:17.5: 14.55 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:36:07.87 -07:06:59.9: 14.66 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:37:31.92 -10:47:04.5: 14.56 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:31.92 -10:47:04.5: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2499 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:36:07.87 -07:06:59.9: 14.24 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:07.87 -07:06:59.9: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3754 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:57.63 -06:43:17.5: 14.49 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:57.63 -06:43:17.5: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3383 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:34:45.69 -06:57:58.8: 14.49 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:09:46.08 -05:49:16.1: 14.38 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:32:55.57 -11:58:59.7: 13.90 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:32:55.57 -11:58:59.7: 14.09 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:09:46.08 -05:49:16.1: 14.34 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:34:45.69 -06:57:58.8: 14.49 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:09:46.08 -05:49:16.1: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4371 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:55.57 -11:58:59.7: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1334 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:29:41.59 -08:20:23.3: 14.95 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:45.69 -06:57:58.8: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3951 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:26:36.79 -14:52:40.1: 14.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:29:41.59 -08:20:23.3: 14.35 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:41.59 -08:20:23.3: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3691 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:26:36.79 -14:52:40.1: 14.30 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:36.79 -14:52:40.1: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0874 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:32:02.87 -08:23:47.7: 14.28 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:30:28.39 -14:24:26.9: 14.12 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:19:57.95 -11:38:22.8: 14.27 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:32:02.87 -08:23:47.7: 14.38 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:02.87 -08:23:47.7: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3881 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:19:57.95 -11:38:22.8: 14.50 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:30:28.39 -14:24:26.9: 14.86 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:34:20.04 -09:19:40.7: 14.53 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:57.95 -11:38:22.8: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1921 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:28.39 -14:24:26.9: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2565 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:10.28 -12:23:25.5: 13.79 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:34:20.04 -09:19:40.7: 14.35 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:20.04 -09:19:40.7: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4260 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:10.28 -12:23:25.5: 14.01 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:10.28 -12:23:25.5: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1099 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:22:47.92 -10:33:52.0: 14.25 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:28:38.58 -13:42:39.0: 14.12 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:37:54.83 -10:48:25.3: 14.37 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:28:38.58 -13:42:39.0: 14.21 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:22:47.92 -10:33:52.0: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:38.58 -13:42:39.0: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1338 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:47.92 -10:33:52.0: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2898 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:37:54.83 -10:48:25.3: 14.36 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:17.70 -14:34:28.3: 14.37 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:54.83 -10:48:25.3: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3235 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:32.00 -13:47:43.1: 14.46 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:17.70 -14:34:28.3: 14.53 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:17.70 -14:34:28.3: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3124 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:32.00 -13:47:43.1: 14.36 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:32.00 -13:47:43.1: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4139 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:30:24.96 -12:26:20.7: 14.80 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:34:22.67 -13:40:44.0: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:28:11.59 -14:33:05.9: 14.59 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:30:24.96 -12:26:20.7: 14.68 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:34:22.67 -13:40:44.0: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:28:11.59 -14:33:05.9: 14.62 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:27:30.98 -13:13:12.4: 14.60 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:29:18.95 -14:40:17.6: 14.56 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:11.59 -14:33:05.9: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.0766 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:24.96 -12:26:20.7: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3254 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:29:18.95 -14:40:17.6: 14.32 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:27:30.98 -13:13:12.4: 14.83 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:18.95 -14:40:17.6: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1232 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:30.98 -13:13:12.4: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2404 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:25:58.19 -14:07:50.5: 14.51 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:14:52.90 -15:07:59.6: 14.82 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:14:52.90 -15:07:59.6: 14.77 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:25:58.19 -14:07:50.5: 14.55 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:52.90 -15:07:59.6: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3860 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:58.19 -14:07:50.5: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3168 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32540.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32546.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32626.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32879.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32918.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33280.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32403_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32403_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32404_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32404_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32405_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32405_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32406_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32406_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32407_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32407_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32408_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32408_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32409_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32409_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32411_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32411_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32412_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32412_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32413_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32413_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32414_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32414_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32416_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32416_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32417_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32417_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32419_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32419_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32422_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32422_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32455_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32455_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:19:24.43 -08:51:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32497_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32497_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:03:19.08 -06:51:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32540_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 32540_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32546_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 32546_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32611_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32611_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:05:10.82 -05:41:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32615_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32615_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32626_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 32626_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32731_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32731_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32762_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32762_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32772_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32772_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32879_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 32879_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32918_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 32918_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32931_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32931_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32949_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32949_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32962_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32962_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32998_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 32998_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33016_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33016_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33020_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33020_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33031_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33031_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33053_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33053_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33054_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33054_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33059_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33059_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33060_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33060_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33079_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33079_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33080_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33080_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33091_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33091_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33100_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33100_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33107_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33107_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33114_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33114_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33116_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33116_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33121_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33121_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33127_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33127_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33148_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33148_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33150_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33150_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33158_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33158_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33180_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33180_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33201_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33201_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33206_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33206_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33214_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33214_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33234_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33234_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33280_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 33280_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33286_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33286_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33300_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33300_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33369_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33369_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:28:10.81 -13:25:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33385_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33385_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33415_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33415_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33463_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33463_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33481_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 33481_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01200_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 01200_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:02:07.44 -14:40:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08581_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 08581_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:11:24.81 -11:28:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21120_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 21120_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_02-56-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
