This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.2715 2461292.7715 9.28 05:16:21.54 +30:42:37.0
175.03194 -4.33248 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" Q1991/100
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.200 V < 14.300 V 2457104.00000 374.000000000000 M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:16:21.54 +30:42:37.0: 10.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:16:21.54 +30:42:37.0: 10.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.23 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Q1991/100,2461292.7715,9.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Q1991/100 20260909.2715 9.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.2715 2461292.7715 12.46 04:41:47.41 +25:18:16.6
174.69593 -13.67193 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.5" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales 0 1 1 12.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:41:47.41 +25:18:16.6: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:41:47.41 +25:18:16.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.2715* 04 41 47.41 +25 18 16.6 12.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.7715,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.2715 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.2715 2461292.7715 13.63 04:28:15.45 +27:15:02.9
171.13702 -14.71316 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana -1 0 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:28:15.45 +27:15:02.9: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:28:15.45 +27:15:02.9: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.2715* 04 28 15.45 +27 15 02.9 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.7715,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.2715 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.2715 2461292.7715 13.96 04:30:40.29 +32:02:50.2
167.83715 -11.11597 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.573 Recha -0 -0 0 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:30:40.29 +32:02:50.2: 15.63 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:30:40.29 +32:02:50.2: 15.32 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.15
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.2715* 04 30 40.29 +32 02 50.2 14.0 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.7715,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.2715 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.2715 2461292.7715 12.93 05:11:24.18 +26:11:08.0
178.10787 -7.84058 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J051124.06+261109.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.240 V 14.700 V 2457285.10000 70.800000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:11:24.18 +26:11:08.0: 13.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:11:24.18 +26:11:08.0: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 09.2715* 05 11 24.18 +26 11 08.0 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J051124.06+261109.3,2461292.7715,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J051124.06+261109.3 20260909.2715 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.2715 2461292.7715 12.49 05:18:00.95 +29:04:17.1
176.58478 -4.98012 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.63 Ausonia 2 -1 2 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:18:00.95 +29:04:17.1: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:18:00.95 +29:04:17.1: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461292.7715,12.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260909.2715 12.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.2715 2461292.7715 13.35 05:15:03.28 +31:38:27.0
174.10908 -4.02164 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 7.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J051503.27+313828.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.360 V 14.860 V 2458427.64740 55.372102400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:15:03.28 +31:38:27.0: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:15:03.28 +31:38:27.0: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J051503.27+313828.1,2461292.7715,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J051503.27+313828.1 20260909.2715 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 09.2715 2461292.7715 13.21 05:22:28.79 +30:37:46.0
175.85152 -3.29803 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J052228.79+303746.8
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.560 V 15.100 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:22:28.79 +30:37:46.0: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:22:28.79 +30:37:46.0: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J052228.79+303746.8,2461292.7715,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J052228.79+303746.8 20260909.2715 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461292.77181539 09.09.2026 06:31:14.850 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15231
Objects passed selection criteria: 15153
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11390.5
Average stars matched: 11080.2 (97.2762 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 245368 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Sep 9 01:39:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461292.77181539 09.09.2026 06:31:14.850 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 113
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 71 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 116747
Objects passed selection criteria: 116500
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 86047.8
Average stars matched: 82808.2 (96.2352 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 578488 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Sep 9 01:42:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461292.77117263
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:57.482 +29:56:26.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:57.482 +29:56:26.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0552 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:56.142 +29:55:48.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:56.142 +29:55:48.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0668 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:57.482 +29:56:26.46
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:56.142 +29:55:48.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01171 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vTd3UAtv2H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FNLlKQeEc5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits &> /tmp/tmp.owEgivoMJy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FTHX3ZYJvH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2864 deg
Loaded 8429 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6042 out of 6743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6743 out of 16349 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
3.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
3.2 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.vTd3UAtv2H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=0, passed=16295
Got 16295 stars (including 14768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FNLlKQeEc5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=0, passed=16349
Got 16349 stars (including 14839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5281)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.owEgivoMJy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=230, bad_region=0, passed=6586
Got 6586 stars (including 6349 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6586 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4765 stars left (next iteration limit 5238)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4765 robust_rms=8.125 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.990 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4765 robust_rms=0.688 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.223 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4765 robust_rms=0.588 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.738 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4765 robust_rms_before=1.649 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.570 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.588 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.778 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.738
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.778 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits N_match=4765 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.759 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.629 n_q1=777 n_q2=811 n_q3=1196 n_q4=1981 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.332
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FTHX3ZYJvH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=229, bad_region=0, passed=6631
Got 6631 stars (including 6396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6631 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4775 stars left (next iteration limit 5247)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=8.117 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.467 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.688 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.028 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.591 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.741 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4775 robust_rms_before=1.616 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.555 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.591 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.704 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.741
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.704 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits N_match=4775 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.694 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.612 n_q1=771 n_q2=820 n_q3=1190 n_q4=1994 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.276
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.114
ref2=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new1=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits sigma_overall=0.570 worst_q_ratio=1.332
new2=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits sigma_overall=0.544 worst_q_ratio=1.276
reference average sigma_overall=0.37 worst_q_ratio=1.1215
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (4801 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (4800 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114_astrometric_residuals.png (4765 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115_astrometric_residuals.png (4775 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:16:21.54 +30:42:37.0: 10.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:16:21.54 +30:42:37.0: 10.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.23 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:16:21.54 +30:42:37.0: ref_mag=10.23 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.2820 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08619.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21138_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 21138_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.23 +32:10:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21176_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 21176_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:11.23 +31:27:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13740_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 13740_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:16.53 +27:22:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12406_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 12406_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:57.45 +28:30:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 00487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.35 +35:03:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 15527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.44 +26:08:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.35 +34:08:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 11604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:17.37 +28:36:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:16:21.54 +30:42:37.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:57.482 +29:56:26.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:57.482 +29:56:26.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0552 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:56.142 +29:55:48.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:56.142 +29:55:48.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0668 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:57.482 +29:56:26.46
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:56.142 +29:55:48.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01171 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IstlJJV4yx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0JYe5oV96c
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GyE59ETBIk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2XYDHXM20A
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.2955 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.2955 deg
Loaded 8479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4936 out of 6881 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6881 out of 129055 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 107 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
2.9 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
2.9 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.IstlJJV4yx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14027, bad_region=9, passed=128967
Got 128967 stars (including 114713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128967 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1871 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1152 n_q4=731 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0JYe5oV96c (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=13827, bad_region=12, passed=129020
Got 129020 stars (including 114961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1874 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1148 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GyE59ETBIk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1836, bad_region=5, passed=44070
Got 44070 stars (including 42173 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44070 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4771 stars left (next iteration limit 5245)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=8.292 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.647 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.680 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.172 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.583 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.725 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4771 robust_rms_before=1.640 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.554 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.583 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.738 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.725
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.738 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits N_match=4771 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.756 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.624 n_q1=787 n_q2=791 n_q3=1246 n_q4=1947 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.346
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2XYDHXM20A (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1849, bad_region=8, passed=44483
Got 44483 stars (including 42563 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44483 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4773 stars left (next iteration limit 5247)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=8.326 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.110 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.688 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.992 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.587 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.740 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4773 robust_rms_before=1.597 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.539 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.587 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.702 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.740
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.702 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits N_match=4773 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.711 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.585 n_q1=776 n_q2=794 n_q3=1247 n_q4=1956 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.339
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-30-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_013157_TTUQ1b1x1_537712_mGoJvupJ/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:38:34.19 +29:58:30.4: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:15:46.27 +31:06:02.3: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:16.32 +32:38:13.4: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:15:46.27 +31:06:02.3: 13.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:41:47.41 +25:18:16.6: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:38:34.19 +29:58:30.4: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:34.19 +29:58:30.4: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6271 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:16.32 +32:38:13.4: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:46.27 +31:06:02.3: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6240 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:16.32 +32:38:13.4: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0330 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:41:47.41 +25:18:16.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:01:47.93 +32:14:40.9: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:09:49.64 +29:48:26.4: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:28:15.45 +27:15:02.9: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:49.93 +29:58:34.7: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:09:49.64 +29:48:26.4: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:49.64 +29:48:26.4: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9858 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:58:09.59 +29:02:22.0: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:01:47.93 +32:14:40.9: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:47.93 +32:14:40.9: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1888 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:58:45.76 +33:26:39.9: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:30:40.29 +32:02:50.2: 15.63 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:28:15.45 +27:15:02.9: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:49.93 +29:58:34.7: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:49.93 +29:58:34.7: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3129 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:58:09.59 +29:02:22.0: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:58:09.59 +29:02:22.0: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3630 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:58:45.76 +33:26:39.9: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:58:45.76 +33:26:39.9: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4503 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:02:02.05 +31:29:32.2: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:30:40.29 +32:02:50.2: 15.32 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:30:40.29 +32:02:50.2: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.9395 delta=1.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:02:02.05 +31:29:32.2: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:02:02.05 +31:29:32.2: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8994 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:11:24.18 +26:11:08.0: 13.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:18:00.95 +29:04:17.1: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:11:24.18 +26:11:08.0: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:11:24.18 +26:11:08.0: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9185 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:18:00.95 +29:04:17.1: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:18:00.95 +29:04:17.1: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4895 delta=1.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:15:03.28 +31:38:27.0: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:15:03.28 +31:38:27.0: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:15:03.28 +31:38:27.0: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3176 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:22:28.79 +30:37:46.0: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:22:28.79 +30:37:46.0: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:22:28.79 +30:37:46.0: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1726 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54729.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101891.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151342.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151630.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151733.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51042.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out63791.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88149.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151101_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151101_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151108_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151108_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:41.86 +32:01:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151114_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151114_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:49.01 +27:53:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151117_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151117_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:10.99 +26:11:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151232_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151232_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:57.84 +33:05:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151255_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151255_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.84 +34:09:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151256_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151256_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:18.12 +33:47:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151260_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151260_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.45 +34:26:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151264_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151264_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.09 +34:07:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151274_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151274_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.35 +34:07:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:56.93 +33:06:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151318_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151318_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:25.55 +34:49:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151330_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151330_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:25.05 +30:30:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151332_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151332_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:29.73 +32:42:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 151342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151343_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151343_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:36.04 +34:06:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151349_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151349_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.87 +26:55:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151375_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151375_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.66 +34:23:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151381_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151381_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:46.57 +31:23:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151383_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151383_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.06 +28:37:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151391_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151391_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:18.77 +34:10:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151401_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151401_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.70 +32:33:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151402_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151402_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:22.00 +28:31:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151416_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151416_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:35.40 +34:07:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151444_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151444_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:46.03 +26:25:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151457_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151457_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.69 +26:10:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151464_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151464_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:10.22 +34:24:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151503_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151503_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:26.40 +34:06:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151513_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151513_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:54.92 +32:26:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151523_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151523_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.59 +33:12:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151544_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151544_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.81 +29:47:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151545_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151545_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.38 +31:44:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151546_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151546_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151547_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151547_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:44.91 +31:08:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151558_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151558_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151576_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151576_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:28.21 +30:16:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151585_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151585_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:36.51 +30:33:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151591_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151591_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:27.58 +34:00:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.71 +29:45:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151629_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151629_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.77 +33:11:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151630_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 151630_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151635_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151635_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151656_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151656_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:35.87 +31:24:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151666_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151666_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151688_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151688_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.16 +31:04:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151710_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 151710_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151733_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 151733_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 140767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:55.65 +30:10:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54729_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 54729_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:02.05 +31:29:32.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.770 157410517038678272 075.50841496409 +31.49179821096 11.9630 10.5134 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.770#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.25 +32:10:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.55 +31:18:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101891_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 101891_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88149_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 88149_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 39926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:02.96 +32:26:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 141164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:25.89 +29:15:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:51.03 +26:46:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 140722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:53.01 +30:33:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:21.17 +30:48:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:47.50 +26:45:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:14.26 +32:02:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103686_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 103686_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:41.64 +26:45:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 113941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:57.79 +27:26:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93940_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 93940_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:35.33 +25:01:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:09.04 +25:22:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 123731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:50.70 +28:10:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:49.33 +25:24:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:38.51 +28:39:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96598_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 96598_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:04.21 +25:01:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 110472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:31.36 +27:01:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103574_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 103574_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.48 +26:23:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 104960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:45.63 +26:37:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48877_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 48877_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:38.12 +31:55:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.46 +28:42:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:11.38 +33:50:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:53.67 +27:26:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 88379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:39.27 +29:06:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:12.34 +25:58:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.35 +35:03:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.43 +26:08:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51042_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 51042_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:49.92 +30:05:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 41372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:11.27 +32:26:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70065_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 70065_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:49.54 +30:24:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:16.49 +27:22:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:26.16 +31:29:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:08.25 +27:03:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111199_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 111199_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:32.00 +25:38:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:49.51 +34:37:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 69229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:42.62 +30:32:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:50.28 +29:42:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 128113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:57.47 +28:30:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63791_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 63791_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 50196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:02.21 +31:50:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121634_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 121634_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116992_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 116992_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:42.94 +27:43:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.37 +34:08:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:21.55 +30:42:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:20.03 +34:08:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122846_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 122846_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:44.94 +28:01:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33443_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 33443_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:24.02 +32:41:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21034_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 21034_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:10.43 +33:22:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 97203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:16.48 +25:08:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:17.37 +28:36:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 04550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:38.69 +34:28:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 37087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-09_01-31-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
