This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.3296 2461291.8296 10.82 21:23:04.06 -18:16:34.5
31.93168 -41.46870 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.354 Eleonora 0 -1 1 10.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:23:04.06 -18:16:34.5: 13.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:23:04.06 -18:16:34.5: 13.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.3296* 21 23 04.06 -18 16 34.5 10.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.8296,10.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.3296 10.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.3296 2461291.8296 11.39 21:05:15.67 -18:22:56.2
29.88750 -37.54656 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.306 Unitas 0 0 0 11.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:05:15.67 -18:22:56.2: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:05:15.67 -18:22:56.2: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.3296* 21 05 15.67 -18 22 56.2 11.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.8296,11.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.3296 11.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.3296 2461291.8296 13.27 20:53:03.52 -12:51:15.3
34.77094 -32.72373 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.38 Leda 0 0 0 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:53:03.52 -12:51:15.3: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:53:03.52 -12:51:15.3: 15.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.8296,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.3296 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.3296 2461291.8296 13.94 21:27:37.99 -14:22:40.2
37.28510 -41.02160 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.286 Iclea -0 -0 0 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:27:37.99 -14:22:40.2: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:27:37.99 -14:22:40.2: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.3296* 21 27 37.99 -14 22 40.2 13.9 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.8296,13.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.3296 13.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.3296 2461291.8296 13.69 20:57:25.66 -17:00:34.1
30.64684 -35.31227 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.558 Carmen 1 0 1 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:57:25.66 -17:00:34.1: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:57:25.66 -17:00:34.1: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.3296* 20 57 25.66 -17 00 34.1 13.7 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.8296,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.3296 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.3296 2461291.8296 14.04 21:44:04.51 -15:16:19.5
38.32766 -45.02271 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2121 Sevastopol 0 -0 1 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:44:04.51 -15:16:19.5: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:44:04.51 -15:16:19.5: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 08.3296* 21 44 04.51 -15 16 19.5 14.0 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.8296,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.3296 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.80621082 21.07.2026 07:20:46.615 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
First image: 2461242.80621082 21.07.2026 07:20:46.615 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
Last image: 2461291.83001676 08.09.2026 07:55:03.448 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6234
Objects passed selection criteria: 6223
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5567.5
Average stars matched: 5408.25 (97.1396 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232600 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 8 02:56:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.80621082 21.07.2026 07:20:46.615 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
First image: 2461242.80621082 21.07.2026 07:20:46.615 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
Last image: 2461291.83001676 08.09.2026 07:55:03.448 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 116
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 43826
Objects passed selection criteria: 43707
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 40815
Average stars matched: 39112.5 (95.8287 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 263728 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 8 02:57:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461291.82912043
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:56.022 -18:00:07.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:38.258 -17:59:57.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:19:56.022 -18:00:07.45
Second-epoch image center 21:19:38.258 -17:59:57.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0704 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:40.762 -18:00:30.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:19:56.022 -18:00:07.45
Second-epoch image center 21:19:40.762 -18:00:30.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0608 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:19:38.258 -17:59:57.57
Second-epoch second image center 21:19:40.762 -18:00:30.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01349 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tVaYhgm5yw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pYVFCaQmXh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SkyaQA1DQv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WnNdVxuX9P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5300 to 328.4153 deg, Dec -23.2576 to -12.6409 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5300 to 328.4153 deg, Dec -23.2576 to -12.6409 deg
Loaded 6825 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4715 out of 4834 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4834 out of 6360 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.521100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.521100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.54
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.54
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5300 to 328.4153 deg, Dec -23.2576 to -12.6409 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5300 to 328.4153 deg, Dec -23.2576 to -12.6409 deg
Loaded 6825 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4715 out of 4834 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4834 out of 6360 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6478 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5993 to 328.4343 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5993 to 328.4343 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6821 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4805 out of 4916 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4916 out of 6478 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
2.2 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
14.6 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.tVaYhgm5yw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=453, bad_region=0, passed=6360
Got 6360 stars (including 5899 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6360 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4812 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4798 stars left (next iteration limit 5277)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits N_match=4798 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=1363 n_q2=1018 n_q3=1373 n_q4=1044 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pYVFCaQmXh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=435, bad_region=0, passed=6478
Got 6478 stars (including 6036 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6478 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6478 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6478 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6478 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5278)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=1357 n_q2=1006 n_q3=1389 n_q4=1047 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.SkyaQA1DQv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=320, bad_region=0, passed=4834
Got 4834 stars (including 4511 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4834 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4324 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4309 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4309 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4309 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4325 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4310 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4310 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4310 stars left (next iteration limit 4739)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4310 robust_rms=10.935 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.875 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4310 robust_rms=0.486 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.515 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4310 robust_rms=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.405 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4310 robust_rms_before=0.980 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.350 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.395 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.405
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.395 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits N_match=4310 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=968 n_q2=1175 n_q3=967 n_q4=1200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WnNdVxuX9P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=308, bad_region=0, passed=4754
Got 4754 stars (including 4438 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4754 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4246 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4232 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4232 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4248 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4233 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4233 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4233 stars left (next iteration limit 4655)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4233 robust_rms=11.063 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.839 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4233 robust_rms=0.504 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.530 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4233 robust_rms=0.348 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.371 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4233 robust_rms_before=0.985 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.341 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.348 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.376 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.371
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.376 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits N_match=4233 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=957 n_q2=1157 n_q3=964 n_q4=1155 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.160
ref2=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.168
new1=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.123
new2=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits sigma_overall=0.344 worst_q_ratio=1.126
reference average sigma_overall=0.388 worst_q_ratio=1.164
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826_astrometric_residuals.png (4798 matched stars from wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294_astrometric_residuals.png (4799 matched stars from wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216_astrometric_residuals.png (4310 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217_astrometric_residuals.png (4233 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-53-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_025542_TTUQ1b1x1_638494_vnFxJOZ0/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:23:04.06 -18:16:34.5: 13.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:05:15.67 -18:22:56.2: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:05:15.67 -18:22:56.2: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:23:04.06 -18:16:34.5: 13.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:23:04.06 -18:16:34.5: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.8206 delta=2.46 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20511.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20581.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20511_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
Preparing report for the candidate 20511_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20581_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
Preparing report for the candidate 20581_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04232_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 04232_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54052_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54052_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54054_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54054_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54057_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54057_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54058_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54058_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54062_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54062_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54065_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54065_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54066_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54066_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54067_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54067_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54068_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54068_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54074_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54074_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54075_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54075_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54077_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54077_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54078_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54078_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54081_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54081_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54082_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54082_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54083_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54083_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54086_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54086_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54087_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54087_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54088_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54088_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54091_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54091_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54092_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54092_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54093_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54093_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54094_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54094_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54249_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54249_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54259_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54259_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:05:15.67 -18:22:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54340_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54340_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:50:06.03 -16:50:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54500_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54500_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54514_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54514_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54671_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54671_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54681_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54681_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54698_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54698_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54708_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54708_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:37:29.90 -21:37:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54712_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54712_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54787_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
Preparing report for the candidate 54787_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54802_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54802_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54858_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54858_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54862_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54862_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54884_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54884_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54900_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54900_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54943_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54943_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54944_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54944_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54958_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54958_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54966_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54966_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54968_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54968_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54990_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 54990_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55057_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55057_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55068_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55068_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55078_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55078_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55108_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55108_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55153_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55153_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55156_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
Preparing report for the candidate 55156_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55168_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55168_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55203_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
Preparing report for the candidate 55203_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55205_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55205_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55210_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55210_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55221_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55221_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55276_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55276_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55281_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55281_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55283_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55283_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55304_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55304_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55342_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55342_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55351_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55351_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55355_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55355_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55360_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55360_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55362_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55362_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55363_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55363_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55368_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
Preparing report for the candidate 55368_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55382_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55382_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55384_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55384_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55385_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55385_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55389_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55389_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55418_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55418_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55420_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55420_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55425_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55425_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55432_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55432_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55440_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55440_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55445_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55445_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55446_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55446_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55454_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55454_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55457_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55457_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55472_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55472_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55474_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55474_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55475_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55475_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55476_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55476_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55488_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55488_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55489_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55489_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55491_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55491_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55492_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55492_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55504_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55504_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55509_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55509_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55526_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55526_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55530_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55530_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55534_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55534_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55539_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55539_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55577_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55577_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55580_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55580_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55620_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55620_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55649_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 55649_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20223_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 20223_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:23:04.06 -18:16:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42509_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 42509_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-08_02-55-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
