This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.2645 2461291.7645 13.37 20:07:31.95 +01:30:04.6
43.24079 -16.14404 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.456 Abnoba 0 0 0 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:07:31.95 +01:30:04.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:07:31.95 +01:30:04.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461291.7645,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260908.2645 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.2645 2461291.7645 13.26 19:49:48.08 +00:21:52.5
40.03150 -12.78512 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J194948.06+002152.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.710 V 14.330 V 2457297.80000 307.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:49:48.08 +00:21:52.5: 14.24 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:49:48.08 +00:21:52.5: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J194948.06+002152.5,2461291.7645,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J194948.06+002152.5 20260908.2645 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 08.2645 2461291.7645 13.05 19:42:58.16 -05:13:34.7
34.12242 -13.83584 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 9.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V1541 Aql
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.200 V < 15.400 V 2454562.00000 295.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:42:58.16 -05:13:34.7: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:42:58.16 -05:13:34.7: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1541 Aql,2461291.7645,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1541 Aql 20260908.2645 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461203.88244201 12.06.2026 09:10:32.990 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461203.88244201 12.06.2026 09:10:32.990 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461291.76473416 08.09.2026 06:21:03.031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14184
Objects passed selection criteria: 14169
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13261.5
Average stars matched: 12912.2 (97.3664 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 240888 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 8 01:25:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461203.88244201 12.06.2026 09:10:32.990 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461203.88244201 12.06.2026 09:10:32.990 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461291.76473416 08.09.2026 06:21:03.031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 138
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 75 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 132811
Objects passed selection criteria: 132597
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 124482
Average stars matched: 118582 (95.2606 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 596776 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 8 01:27:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461291.76422358
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:53.275 -01:59:56.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:44.397 -02:04:46.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.275 -01:59:56.67
Second-epoch image center 19:42:44.397 -02:04:46.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0885 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:46.312 -02:04:01.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.275 -01:59:56.67
Second-epoch image center 19:42:46.312 -02:04:01.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0739 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:42:44.397 -02:04:46.23
Second-epoch second image center 19:42:46.312 -02:04:01.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01479 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F5QMovF40b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ln7o3LEIGS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oKY9WGj113
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R4byYUR6pS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 20227 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.8574 to 303.5971 deg, Dec -7.2599 to +3.2634 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.8574 to 303.5971 deg, Dec -7.2599 to 3.2634 deg
Loaded 10289 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8488 out of 8950 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8950 out of 20227 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.706950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.706950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.96
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.96
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 20227 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.8574 to 303.5971 deg, Dec -7.2599 to +3.2634 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.8574 to 303.5971 deg, Dec -7.2599 to 3.2634 deg
Loaded 10289 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8488 out of 8950 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8950 out of 20227 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 20355 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.8562 to 303.5949 deg, Dec -7.2521 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.8562 to 303.5949 deg, Dec -7.2521 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 10292 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8460 out of 8944 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8944 out of 20355 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.3 pix Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.0 mag. Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.F5QMovF40b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1243, bad_region=5559, passed=20227
Got 20227 stars (including 13746 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20227 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.552 n_q1=1710 n_q2=1061 n_q3=1253 n_q4=871 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.253
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ln7o3LEIGS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1255, bad_region=5422, passed=20355
Got 20355 stars (including 13974 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20355 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.521 n_q1=1731 n_q2=1024 n_q3=1295 n_q4=850 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits -region wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.oKY9WGj113 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=845, bad_region=3242, passed=15167
Got 15167 stars (including 11293 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 467 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 467 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=6.885 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.903 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.482 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.594 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.452 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.565 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4896 robust_rms_before=0.680 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.482 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.482 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.625 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.594
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.625 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.549 n_q1=1805 n_q2=995 n_q3=1317 n_q4=779 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.R4byYUR6pS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=3213, passed=15088
Got 15088 stars (including 11225 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15088 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 467 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 467 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4901 robust_rms=6.911 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.209 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4901 robust_rms=0.497 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.589 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4901 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.574 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4901 robust_rms_before=0.684 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.486 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.497 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.611 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.589
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.611 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.517 n_q1=1807 n_q2=990 n_q3=1328 n_q4=776 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=0.462 worst_q_ratio=1.253
ref2=Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits sigma_overall=0.467 worst_q_ratio=1.138
new1=fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=0.478 worst_q_ratio=1.198
new2=fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits sigma_overall=0.480 worst_q_ratio=1.231
reference average sigma_overall=0.4645 worst_q_ratio=1.1955
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228_astrometric_residuals.png (4901 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:50:11.87 -01:27:36.1: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:51:44.39 -02:47:17.4: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:07:22.07 +01:38:02.5: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:56:38.67 +01:39:23.0: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:45:20.07 +00:19:37.6: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:47:20.09 -00:46:54.6: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:31:03.38 -00:39:48.7: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:47:46.35 +00:19:22.5: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:50:11.87 -01:27:36.1: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:31:03.38 -00:39:48.7: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:45:20.07 +00:19:37.6: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:56:38.67 +01:39:23.0: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:47:20.09 -00:46:54.6: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:51:44.39 -02:47:17.4: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:07:22.07 +01:38:02.5: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:11.87 -01:27:36.1: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0879 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:31:03.38 -00:39:48.7: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1201 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:20.07 +00:19:37.6: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0994 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:20.09 -00:46:54.6: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0542 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:38.67 +01:39:23.0: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2328 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:44.39 -02:47:17.4: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9860 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:22.07 +01:38:02.5: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0066 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:47:46.35 +00:19:22.5: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:46.35 +00:19:22.5: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1626 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31154_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 31154_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31158_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 31158_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31209_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 31209_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:30:47.75 -02:47:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31225_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 31225_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:36.74 +00:19:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31229_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 31229_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:29.15 -01:44:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31254_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 31254_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31258_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 31258_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31260_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 31260_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31269_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 31269_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31271_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 31271_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31283_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 31283_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03119_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 03119_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:27:36.50 +02:03:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:53.275 -01:59:56.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:44.397 -02:04:46.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.275 -01:59:56.67
Second-epoch image center 19:42:44.397 -02:04:46.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0885 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:46.312 -02:04:01.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.275 -01:59:56.67
Second-epoch image center 19:42:46.312 -02:04:01.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0739 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:42:44.397 -02:04:46.23
Second-epoch second image center 19:42:46.312 -02:04:01.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01479 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w6TfkSda7F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KnNczqvXQO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.niU2Msjyq6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sF86FKesyH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167162 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.8558 to 303.5989 deg, Dec -7.2624 to +3.2650 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.8558 to 303.5989 deg, Dec -7.2624 to 3.2650 deg
Loaded 10296 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7300 out of 9230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9230 out of 167162 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.545200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.545200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167162 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.8558 to 303.5989 deg, Dec -7.2624 to +3.2650 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.8558 to 303.5989 deg, Dec -7.2624 to 3.2650 deg
Loaded 10296 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7300 out of 9230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9230 out of 167162 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 183128 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.8553 to 303.5977 deg, Dec -7.2536 to +3.2758 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.8553 to 303.5977 deg, Dec -7.2536 to 3.2758 deg
Loaded 10297 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7125 out of 9225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9225 out of 183128 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 90 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.2 mag. Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.w6TfkSda7F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=19123, bad_region=31897, passed=167147
Got 167147 stars (including 120817 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167147 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.538 n_q1=1725 n_q2=1034 n_q3=1334 n_q4=819 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KnNczqvXQO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=21567, bad_region=35769, passed=183109
Got 183109 stars (including 130765 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 183109 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 156363 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 156363 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 156363 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4916 stars left (next iteration limit 5406)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits N_match=4916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.501 n_q1=1717 n_q2=991 n_q3=1376 n_q4=832 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits -region wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.niU2Msjyq6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=13609, bad_region=21140, passed=130026
Got 130026 stars (including 98905 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 130026 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 467 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 114202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 467 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 114202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 114202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=6.708 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.156 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=0.469 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.571 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=0.441 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.555 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4911 robust_rms_before=0.689 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.464 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.469 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.621 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.571
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.621 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.531 n_q1=1831 n_q2=930 n_q3=1408 n_q4=742 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.sF86FKesyH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=13513, bad_region=21193, passed=130754
Got 130754 stars (including 99640 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 130754 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 467 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 114902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 467 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 114902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 114902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=6.787 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.891 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=0.488 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.581 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=0.451 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.563 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4911 robust_rms_before=0.688 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.477 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.488 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.614 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.581
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.614 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.542 n_q1=1842 n_q2=928 n_q3=1399 n_q4=742 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-20-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-08_CI_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_012306_TTUQ2b1x1_1799881_4lEZCjFY/wcs_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:38:17.99 -01:25:24.2: 14.14 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:51:04.06 -00:48:38.5: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:47:59.73 -00:01:34.5: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:40:47.08 +00:46:58.8: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:40:46.29 -00:08:30.3: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:09:19.46 -01:18:03.0: 14.38 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:44:43.85 +00:22:07.2: 14.54 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:58:03.31 -01:26:59.6: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:47:44.66 -01:40:11.3: 14.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:48:06.93 -04:17:59.4: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:09:19.46 -01:18:03.0: 14.52 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:40:47.08 +00:46:58.8: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:38:17.99 -01:25:24.2: 13.98 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:44:43.85 +00:22:07.2: 14.55 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:47:44.66 -01:40:11.3: 14.34 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:58:03.31 -01:26:59.6: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:51:04.06 -00:48:38.5: 14.62 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:40:46.29 -00:08:30.3: 14.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:48:06.93 -04:17:59.4: 14.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:19.46 -01:18:03.0: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5966 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:47.08 +00:46:58.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4993 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:43.85 +00:22:07.2: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4870 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:44.66 -01:40:11.3: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3329 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:17.99 -01:25:24.2: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2016 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:04.06 -00:48:38.5: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6404 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:03.31 -01:26:59.6: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6780 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:46.29 -00:08:30.3: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4754 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:06.93 -04:17:59.4: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6641 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:47:59.73 -00:01:34.5: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:59.73 -00:01:34.5: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5178 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:09:39.74 -01:56:54.5: 14.42 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:07:29.51 -06:13:58.9: 14.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:57:03.13 -05:38:21.1: 14.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:49:46.18 -01:25:45.1: 14.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:30:41.02 -04:34:42.3: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:41:54.31 -04:39:31.8: 14.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:08:48.99 -05:47:42.3: 14.18 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:00:07.34 +02:04:17.6: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:54:28.07 -05:50:38.8: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:30:41.02 -04:34:42.3: 15.22 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:09:39.74 -01:56:54.5: 14.08 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:49:46.18 -01:25:45.1: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:54:28.07 -05:50:38.8: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:00:07.34 +02:04:17.6: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:41:54.31 -04:39:31.8: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:57:03.13 -05:38:21.1: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:07:29.51 -06:13:58.9: 14.33 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:08:48.99 -05:47:42.3: 13.99 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:47:59.50 -03:24:42.4: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:30:41.02 -04:34:42.3: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.0945 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:54.31 -04:39:31.8: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4007 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:07.34 +02:04:17.6: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2858 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:29.51 -06:13:58.9: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3786 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:28.07 -05:50:38.8: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0574 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:39.74 -01:56:54.5: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2790 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:03.13 -05:38:21.1: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5089 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:46.18 -01:25:45.1: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3672 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:48.99 -05:47:42.3: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4454 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:47:59.50 -03:24:42.4: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:59.50 -03:24:42.4: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1057 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:51:38.96 -00:27:15.6: 13.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:31:22.23 -00:03:59.5: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:47:45.83 +01:41:44.6: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:53:17.83 +00:51:23.0: 13.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:42:15.00 +01:41:06.0: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:45:04.84 -01:37:32.1: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:46:51.48 -04:20:01.0: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:59:12.48 +01:02:45.8: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:51:38.96 -00:27:15.6: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:31:22.23 -00:03:59.5: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:38.96 -00:27:15.6: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1945 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:47:45.83 +01:41:44.6: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:59:12.48 +01:02:45.8: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:53:17.83 +00:51:23.0: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:46:51.48 -04:20:01.0: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:45:04.84 -01:37:32.1: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:42:15.00 +01:41:06.0: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:31:22.23 -00:03:59.5: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9959 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:12.48 +01:02:45.8: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0203 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:17.83 +00:51:23.0: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7937 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:51.48 -04:20:01.0: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0147 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:45.83 +01:41:44.6: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6883 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:15.00 +01:41:06.0: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8929 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:04.84 -01:37:32.1: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7452 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:56:16.93 -00:39:41.6: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:56:16.93 -00:39:41.6: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:16.93 -00:39:41.6: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7186 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:47:23.88 +00:27:55.9: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:48:37.08 +00:17:01.8: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:03:31.09 -00:22:31.8: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:47:23.88 +00:27:55.9: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:48:37.08 +00:17:01.8: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:03:31.09 -00:22:31.8: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:23.88 +00:27:55.9: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3612 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:37.08 +00:17:01.8: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1009 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:31.09 -00:22:31.8: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6172 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:04:38.86 +01:09:21.8: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:07:31.95 +01:30:04.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:07:22.07 -05:26:08.1: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:29:20.50 -01:24:13.4: 13.71 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:49:37.21 -04:32:45.8: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:07:31.95 +01:30:04.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:29:20.50 -01:24:13.4: 13.61 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:04:38.86 +01:09:21.8: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:07:22.07 -05:26:08.1: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:20.50 -01:24:13.4: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6219 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:49:37.21 -04:32:45.8: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:38.86 +01:09:21.8: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2206 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:22.07 -05:26:08.1: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7859 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:37.21 -04:32:45.8: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3373 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:45:01.03 +00:45:18.7: 13.96 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:47:46.23 -00:04:18.2: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:05:17.00 +00:26:18.2: 14.22 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:42:35.02 +01:15:49.3: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:45:01.03 +00:45:18.7: 13.95 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:47:46.23 -00:04:18.2: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:01.03 +00:45:18.7: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8588 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:46.23 -00:04:18.2: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8258 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:05:17.00 +00:26:18.2: 14.19 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:17.00 +00:26:18.2: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1289 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:42:35.02 +01:15:49.3: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:35:52.66 -01:57:04.3: 14.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:01:32.76 -03:34:55.8: 15.10 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:32:50.59 -06:14:58.0: 14.38 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:35:52.66 -01:57:04.3: 14.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:01:32.76 -03:34:55.8: 14.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:35:52.66 -01:57:04.3: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0897 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:32.76 -03:34:55.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3593 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:32:50.59 -06:14:58.0: 14.41 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:50.59 -06:14:58.0: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2194 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:36:47.10 -01:02:54.1: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:08:25.88 +00:51:15.0: 14.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:59:40.45 -04:54:00.4: 14.33 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:08:20.69 +01:40:38.9: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:09:57.60 -03:16:32.7: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:36:47.10 -01:02:54.1: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:08:25.88 +00:51:15.0: 14.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:59:40.45 -04:54:00.4: 14.34 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:25.88 +00:51:15.0: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5044 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:08:20.69 +01:40:38.9: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:40.45 -04:54:00.4: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3092 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:20.69 +01:40:38.9: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4676 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:09:57.60 -03:16:32.7: 15.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:57.60 -03:16:32.7: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4887 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:41:09.33 +01:56:48.5: 14.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:40:22.62 -03:21:39.0: 14.26 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:06:47.21 +01:02:37.6: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:40:22.62 -03:21:39.0: 14.10 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:41:09.33 +01:56:48.5: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:06:47.21 +01:02:37.6: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:22.62 -03:21:39.0: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3054 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:09.33 +01:56:48.5: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4325 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:47.21 +01:02:37.6: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5195 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:42:47.18 -04:20:57.8: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:45:57.14 +00:30:04.2: 15.20 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:08:35.69 -03:38:30.6: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:00:14.91 -04:20:38.8: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:36:56.08 -03:56:12.6: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:42:47.18 -04:20:57.8: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:45:57.14 +00:30:04.2: 15.65 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:08:35.69 -03:38:30.6: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:47.18 -04:20:57.8: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4035 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:45:57.14 +00:30:04.2: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.3405 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:35.69 -03:38:30.6: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6189 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:00:14.91 -04:20:38.8: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:14.91 -04:20:38.8: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5639 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:36:56.08 -03:56:12.6: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:56.08 -03:56:12.6: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4650 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:46:59.90 -05:51:12.9: 15.00 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 20:00:39.46 -03:03:47.9: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:53:33.57 -05:57:43.6: 14.56 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:46:59.90 -05:51:12.9: 15.06 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 20:00:39.46 -03:03:47.9: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:49:51.57 -01:05:22.7: 15.65 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:59:54.07 +01:44:24.7: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:39:39.11 -02:33:12.9: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:39.46 -03:03:47.9: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5046 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:59.90 -05:51:12.9: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5360 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:49:51.57 -01:05:22.7: 15.63 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:39:39.11 -02:33:12.9: 14.71 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:53:33.57 -05:57:43.6: 14.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.64 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:49:51.57 -01:05:22.7: ref_mag=15.64 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.3619 delta=1.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:59:54.07 +01:44:24.7: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:39.11 -02:33:12.9: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3738 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:33.57 -05:57:43.6: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5404 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:54.07 +01:44:24.7: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6001 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:57:42.38 -04:12:24.1: 14.31 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:51:45.59 -06:07:20.2: 15.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:45:12.06 -05:11:40.3: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:57:42.38 -04:12:24.1: 14.21 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:51:45.59 -06:07:20.2: 15.36 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:42.38 -04:12:24.1: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3237 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:45.59 -06:07:20.2: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7163 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:45:12.06 -05:11:40.3: 15.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:12.06 -05:11:40.3: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6376 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:42:58.16 -05:13:34.7: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-10-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 19:49:48.08 +00:21:52.5: 14.24 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:42:58.16 -05:13:34.7: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-15-16_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 19:49:48.08 +00:21:52.5: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:42:58.16 -05:13:34.7: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0504 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:49:48.08 +00:21:52.5: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2616 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out197849.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out198669.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out198872.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out198978.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out199046.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161138.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out198327.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52968.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197738_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197738_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197750_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197750_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197768_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197768_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197777_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197777_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197786_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197786_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197788_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197788_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197789_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197789_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197790_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197790_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197793_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197793_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197802_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197802_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197818_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197818_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197820_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197820_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197822_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197822_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197824_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197824_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197831_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197831_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197842_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197842_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197848_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197848_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197849_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197849_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:30:41.02 -04:34:42.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.08)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.460 4213126664119257472 292.67064889020 -04.57962640705 14.1928 12.3983 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.460#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197862_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197862_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197871_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197871_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197873_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197873_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197878_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197878_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197879_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197879_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197880_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197880_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197882_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197882_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197898_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197898_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197901_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197901_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197912_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197912_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197915_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197915_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197919_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197919_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197930_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197930_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197935_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197935_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197942_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 197942_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198114_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198114_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:27.36 +01:13:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198151_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198151_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:07.28 -04:52:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198192_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198192_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:22.85 -06:15:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198250_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198250_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:50.80 -02:51:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198295_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198295_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:49:35.69 -05:32:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198306_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198306_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:26.48 +01:25:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198319_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198319_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198327_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
Preparing report for the candidate 198327_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198336_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198336_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:34.80 -01:30:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198349_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198349_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198445_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198445_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:15.17 -05:42:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198462_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198462_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198571_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198571_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198610_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198610_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198636_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198636_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198662_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198662_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198669_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198669_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:35.02 +01:15:49.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.05, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.03)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.811 4239814834986418688 295.64590012307 +01.26391917056 13.1260 10.9991 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.811#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198672_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198672_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:59.95 -04:21:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198732_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198732_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:30:34.24 -02:14:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198738_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198738_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198796_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198796_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198807_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198807_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:10.00 +01:55:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198858_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198858_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198872_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198872_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:47.10 -01:02:54.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.20)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.407 4238270704036477184 294.19586537269 -01.04829212307 13.8715 12.4517 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.407#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198876_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198876_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198885_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198885_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198908_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198908_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198915_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198915_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198932_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198932_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198933_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198933_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198951_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198951_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198956_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198956_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198978_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198978_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:57.14 +00:30:04.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.497 4238952749148951040 296.48834223037 +00.50052305155 13.7531 11.7432 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.497#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198986_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198986_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198991_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 198991_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199004_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 199004_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199013_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 199013_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199014_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 199014_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199028_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 199028_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:31:50.23 +00:48:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199040_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 199040_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199046_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 199046_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:49:51.57 -01:05:22.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.653 4235460597139977984 297.46510554168 -01.08893883609 11.9324 10.1200 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.653#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199056_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 199056_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199064_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 199064_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199072_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 199072_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199131_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 199131_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199160_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 199160_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181948_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 181948_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:20.14 -01:29:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184647_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 184647_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:08.84 -02:13:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71291_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 71291_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:27:26.97 -00:36:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91952_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 91952_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:29.18 -01:44:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185250_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 185250_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:42.76 -00:11:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181840_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 181840_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:09.41 -02:30:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52968_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
Preparing report for the candidate 52968_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161138_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
Preparing report for the candidate 161138_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114560_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 114560_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:24.90 -03:10:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107966_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 107966_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:17.56 -02:42:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24512_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228
The candidate 24512_fd_Aql-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-08_01-21-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228 did not pass the final checks