This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4443 2461290.9443 12.96 03:25:49.41 +18:42:08.2
166.41964 -30.83978 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.72 Feronia -0 -0 0 13.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:25:49.41 +18:42:08.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:25:49.41 +18:42:08.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4443* 03 25 49.41 +18 42 08.2 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9443,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4443 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4443 2461290.9443 13.54 03:58:04.48 +17:45:48.8
173.49994 -26.26946 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato -0 -0 0 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:04.48 +17:45:48.8: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:04.48 +17:45:48.8: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4443* 03 58 04.48 +17 45 48.8 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9443,13.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4443 13.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4443 2461290.9443 13.82 03:01:38.67 +16:11:21.4
162.86591 -36.39125 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.149 Medusa -0 -0 0 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:01:38.67 +16:11:21.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:01:38.67 +16:11:21.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4443* 03 01 38.67 +16 11 21.4 13.8 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9443,13.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4443 13.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4443 2461290.9443 13.92 03:14:17.89 +11:36:59.7
169.47216 -38.02385 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.619 Triberga -1 -0 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:14:17.89 +11:36:59.7: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:14:17.89 +11:36:59.7: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4443* 03 14 17.89 +11 36 59.7 13.9 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9443,13.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4443 13.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4443 2461290.9443 14.29 03:48:09.90 +16:34:58.2
172.58500 -28.78704 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.443 Photographica 1 0 1 14.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:48:09.90 +16:34:58.2: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:48:09.90 +16:34:58.2: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4443* 03 48 09.90 +16 34 58.2 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9443,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4443 14.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4443 2461290.9443 14.34 03:55:30.00 +14:34:47.0
175.63096 -28.90627 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.742 Edisona 0 1 1 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:55:30.00 +14:34:47.0: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:55:30.00 +14:34:47.0: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4443* 03 55 30.00 +14 34 47.0 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9443,14.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4443 14.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4443 2461290.9443 14.38 03:46:21.14 +16:51:01.8
172.01820 -28.90335 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.131 Vala -1 0 1 14.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:46:21.14 +16:51:01.8: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:46:21.14 +16:51:01.8: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4443* 03 46 21.14 +16 51 01.8 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9443,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4443 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4443 2461290.9443 14.70 03:25:57.86 +19:10:43.2
166.09171 -30.45447 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.586 Thekla -1 0 1 14.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:25:57.86 +19:10:43.2: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:25:57.86 +19:10:43.2: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4443* 03 25 57.86 +19 10 43.2 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9443,14.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4443 14.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
First image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Last image: 2461290.94456860 07.09.2026 10:40:00.727 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8213
Objects passed selection criteria: 8205
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7795.25
Average stars matched: 7518.75 (96.453 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233996 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 7 05:43:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
First image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Last image: 2461290.94456860 07.09.2026 10:40:00.727 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 239
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 46742
Objects passed selection criteria: 46652
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 42780
Average stars matched: 41486.8 (96.977 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 267436 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 7 05:44:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461290.94405600
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:04.956 +13:59:30.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:04.956 +13:59:30.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0627 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:06.097 +13:59:31.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:06.097 +13:59:31.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0581 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:33:04.956 +13:59:30.41
Second-epoch second image center 03:33:06.097 +13:59:31.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00462 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g6CrLfkBVk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ewTX5fneIl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LGFuxBEVeu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d7UdpyWvUt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.950750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.950750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec +8.6182 to +19.2791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec 8.6182 to 19.2791 deg
Loaded 4354 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3736 out of 7722 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
2.0 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
3.3 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
3.3 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.g6CrLfkBVk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=551, bad_region=0, passed=7716
Got 7716 stars (including 7157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1380 n_q2=1359 n_q3=1203 n_q4=953 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.327
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ewTX5fneIl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=536, bad_region=0, passed=7722
Got 7722 stars (including 7177 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1378 n_q2=1355 n_q3=1207 n_q4=960 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.311
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LGFuxBEVeu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=363, bad_region=0, passed=7952
Got 7952 stars (including 7586 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7952 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=11.971 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.661 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.373 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.388 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.292 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.354 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4899 robust_rms_before=0.899 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.285 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.292 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.362 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.354
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.362 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=967 n_q2=1174 n_q3=1397 n_q4=1361 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.295
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.d7UdpyWvUt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=368, bad_region=0, passed=7997
Got 7997 stars (including 7625 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=11.880 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.556 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=0.366 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.394 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=0.288 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.353 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4894 robust_rms_before=0.876 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.287 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.288 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.363 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.353
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.363 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=967 n_q2=1161 n_q3=1398 n_q4=1368 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.327
ref2=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.307 worst_q_ratio=1.311
new1=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.295
new2=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits sigma_overall=0.288 worst_q_ratio=1.307
reference average sigma_overall=0.306 worst_q_ratio=1.319
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448_astrometric_residuals.png (4899 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449_astrometric_residuals.png (4894 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:34:58.77 +15:19:16.4: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:43:26.67 +12:49:58.2: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:10:54.96 +19:07:00.7: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:38:10.29 +13:46:02.3: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:29:23.54 +13:29:49.4: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:34:00.85 +16:04:03.4: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:31:17.21 +17:33:29.6: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:38:10.29 +13:46:02.3: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:34:00.85 +16:04:03.4: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:29:23.54 +13:29:49.4: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:34:58.77 +15:19:16.4: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:31:17.21 +17:33:29.6: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:10:54.96 +19:07:00.7: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:43:26.67 +12:49:58.2: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:00.85 +16:04:03.4: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3808 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:10.29 +13:46:02.3: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4261 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:58.77 +15:19:16.4: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4676 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:17.21 +17:33:29.6: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3868 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:23.54 +13:29:49.4: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4131 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:54.96 +19:07:00.7: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1168 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:26.67 +12:49:58.2: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3508 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20459_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20459_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:23.49 +16:01:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20552_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20552_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20583_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20583_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20587_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20587_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20589_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20589_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20593_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20593_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20600_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20600_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20601_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20601_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:04.956 +13:59:30.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:04.956 +13:59:30.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0627 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:06.097 +13:59:31.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:06.097 +13:59:31.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0581 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:33:04.956 +13:59:30.41
Second-epoch second image center 03:33:06.097 +13:59:31.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00462 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sQY848q5Fi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WgTNQHOaa9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z2qr6uGPg0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oPWEtB1GCz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.830300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.830300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 48560 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec +8.6183 to +19.2794 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec 8.6183 to 19.2794 deg
Loaded 4358 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3320 out of 3753 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3753 out of 48560 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 215 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
1.9 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.sQY848q5Fi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2222, bad_region=4, passed=48568
Got 48568 stars (including 46270 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48568 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.252 n_q1=1362 n_q2=1350 n_q3=1192 n_q4=994 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.312
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WgTNQHOaa9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2192, bad_region=5, passed=48544
Got 48544 stars (including 46257 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48544 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1361 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1201 n_q4=986 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.z2qr6uGPg0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1506, bad_region=41, passed=37611
Got 37611 stars (including 36016 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37611 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=12.205 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.736 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.394 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.291 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.353 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4897 robust_rms_before=0.889 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.284 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.291 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.362 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.353
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.362 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.239 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=982 n_q2=1149 n_q3=1403 n_q4=1363 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.293
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.oPWEtB1GCz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1476, bad_region=42, passed=37560
Got 37560 stars (including 35990 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37560 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=11.948 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.619 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.369 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.390 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.289 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.357 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4892 robust_rms_before=0.867 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.284 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.289 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.363 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.357
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.363 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=981 n_q2=1139 n_q3=1408 n_q4=1364 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.287
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-39-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_054046_TTUQ1b1x1_1122242_W1FHdumA/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:56:19.98 +08:53:26.2: 14.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:45:33.69 +12:52:25.2: 14.48 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:16:18.82 +17:15:00.6: 14.96 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:04:46.14 +15:34:44.4: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:36:29.26 +18:04:30.6: 15.01 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:56:19.98 +08:53:26.2: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:45:33.69 +12:52:25.2: 14.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:36:29.26 +18:04:30.6: 14.60 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:04:46.14 +15:34:44.4: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:16:18.82 +17:15:00.6: 14.96 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:19.98 +08:53:26.2: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4281 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:33.69 +12:52:25.2: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5073 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:36:29.26 +18:04:30.6: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7822 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:04:46.14 +15:34:44.4: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4506 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:16:18.82 +17:15:00.6: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9003 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:25:49.41 +18:42:08.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:25:49.41 +18:42:08.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:08:03.68 +17:00:32.7: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:04.48 +17:45:48.8: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:04.48 +17:45:48.8: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:08:03.68 +17:00:32.7: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:08:03.68 +17:00:32.7: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5581 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:01:38.67 +16:11:21.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:01:38.67 +16:11:21.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:14:17.89 +11:36:59.7: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:14:17.89 +11:36:59.7: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:23:30.47 +17:10:26.6: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:23:30.47 +17:10:26.6: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:30.47 +17:10:26.6: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1859 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:48:09.90 +16:34:58.2: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:55:30.00 +14:34:47.0: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:48:09.90 +16:34:58.2: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:55:30.00 +14:34:47.0: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:46:21.14 +16:51:01.8: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:46:21.14 +16:51:01.8: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:25:57.86 +19:10:43.2: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:25:57.86 +19:10:43.2: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:09:05.02 +15:23:08.7: 15.30 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:13:45.26 +18:24:48.6: 15.41 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:09:05.02 +15:23:08.7: 15.56 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:05.02 +15:23:08.7: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7439 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:13:45.26 +18:24:48.6: 15.26 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:45.26 +18:24:48.6: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0107 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53845.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54038.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54122.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54182.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54347.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54365.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54443.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54487.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53519_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53519_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53523_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53523_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53526_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53526_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53528_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53528_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53534_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53534_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53535_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53535_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53537_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53537_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53543_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53543_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:42.42 +16:18:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53548_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53548_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53610_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53610_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53629_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53629_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53635_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53635_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53679_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53679_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53707_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53707_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53710_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53710_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53725_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53725_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53748_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53748_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53753_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53753_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53759_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53759_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53762_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53762_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53781_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53781_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53811_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53811_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53812_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53812_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53845_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 53845_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53852_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53852_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53878_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53878_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53889_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53889_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53890_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53890_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53895_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53895_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:47.27 +09:11:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53900_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53900_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53925_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53925_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53928_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53928_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53937_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53937_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53953_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53953_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53957_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53957_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53963_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53963_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53967_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53967_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53973_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53973_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53982_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53982_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:02.15 +16:29:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53994_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53994_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54001_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54001_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54003_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54003_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54006_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54006_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54016_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54016_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54038_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 54038_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54049_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54049_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54050_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54050_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54051_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54051_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54066_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54066_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54070_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54070_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54073_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54073_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54092_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54092_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54096_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54096_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54103_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54103_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54120_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54120_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54122_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 54122_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54126_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54126_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54132_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54132_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54133_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54133_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54136_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54136_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54138_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54138_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:07:55.01 +16:03:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54141_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54141_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54145_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54145_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54153_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54153_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54154_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54154_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54159_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54159_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54160_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54160_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54165_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54165_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54171_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54171_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54182_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 54182_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54184_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54184_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54193_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54193_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54194_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54194_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54198_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54198_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54210_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54210_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54216_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54216_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54217_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54217_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54218_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54218_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54221_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54221_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54224_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54224_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54225_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54225_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54234_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54234_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54240_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54240_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54245_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54245_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54247_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54247_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54251_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54251_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54254_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54254_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54274_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54274_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54299_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54299_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54300_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54300_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54303_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54303_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54309_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54309_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54313_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54313_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54315_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54315_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54329_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54329_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54342_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54342_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:00.18 +15:36:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54344_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54344_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54347_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 54347_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54348_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54348_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54351_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54351_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54362_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54362_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54364_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54364_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54365_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 54365_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54366_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54366_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54368_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54368_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54376_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54376_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54377_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54377_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54383_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54383_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54390_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54390_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54395_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54395_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54396_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54396_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54398_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54398_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54405_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54405_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54408_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54408_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54413_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54413_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54414_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54414_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54419_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54419_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54421_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54421_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54429_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54429_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54431_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54431_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54432_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54432_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54442_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54442_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54443_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 54443_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54455_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54455_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54457_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54457_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54460_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54460_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54461_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54461_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54463_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54463_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54465_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54465_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54468_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54468_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54475_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54475_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54481_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54481_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54485_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54485_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54486_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54486_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54487_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 54487_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54488_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54488_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54497_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54497_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54502_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54502_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54505_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54505_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54507_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54507_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54514_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54514_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54516_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54516_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54523_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54523_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54528_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54528_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54532_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54532_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54536_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54536_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54538_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54538_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54541_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54541_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54542_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54542_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54545_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54545_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54547_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54547_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54553_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54553_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54582_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54582_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54590_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54590_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54591_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54591_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54595_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54595_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54598_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54598_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54603_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54603_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54610_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54610_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54612_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54612_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54617_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54617_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54623_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54623_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54625_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54625_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54630_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54630_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54631_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54631_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54632_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54632_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54635_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54635_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54637_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54637_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54645_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54645_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54646_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54646_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54648_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54648_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54652_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54652_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54653_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54653_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54654_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54654_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54668_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54668_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54675_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54675_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54678_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54678_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54685_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54685_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54687_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54687_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54691_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54691_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54694_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54694_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54697_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54697_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54700_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54700_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54701_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54701_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54703_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54703_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54704_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54704_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54705_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54705_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54706_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54706_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54707_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54707_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54710_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54710_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54716_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54716_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54718_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54718_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54721_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54721_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54724_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54724_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54725_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54725_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54727_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54727_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54736_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54736_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54740_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54740_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54741_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54741_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54743_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54743_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54744_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54744_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54746_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54746_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54748_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54748_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54755_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54755_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54758_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54758_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54774_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54774_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54779_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54779_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54780_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54780_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54796_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54796_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54798_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54798_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54801_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54801_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54818_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54818_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17153_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 17153_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:23.48 +16:01:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52785_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52785_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40313_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 40313_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-40-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
