This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4269* 04 13 41.09 +21 01 59.3 7.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9269,7.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4269 7.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4269* 04 13 41.09 +21 01 59.2 7.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9269,7.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4269 7.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4269 2461290.9269 12.93 03:25:48.83 +18:42:08.5
166.41754 -30.84119 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.72 Feronia -0 -0 0 13.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:48.83 +18:42:08.5: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:48.83 +18:42:08.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4269* 03 25 48.83 +18 42 08.5 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9269,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4269 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4269 2461290.9269 13.53 03:58:03.73 +17:45:47.8
173.49787 -26.27180 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato -0 -0 0 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:58:03.73 +17:45:47.8: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:58:03.73 +17:45:47.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4269* 03 58 03.73 +17 45 47.8 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9269,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4269 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4269 2461290.9269 13.61 04:03:22.20 +22:06:30.3
171.02575 -22.35221 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.83 Beatrix -0 -0 0 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:03:22.20 +22:06:30.3: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:03:22.20 +22:06:30.3: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4269* 04 03 22.20 +22 06 30.3 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9269,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4269 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4269 2461290.9269 14.35 03:26:09.17 +22:39:00.1
163.60180 -27.74873 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.830 Petropolitana -0 -0 0 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:09.17 +22:39:00.1: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:09.17 +22:39:00.1: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4269* 03 26 09.17 +22 39 00.1 14.3 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9269,14.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4269 14.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4269 2461290.9269 14.41 03:11:06.45 +21:52:58.8
160.98012 -30.48001 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.514 Armida -1 -0 1 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:11:06.45 +21:52:58.8: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:11:06.45 +21:52:58.8: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4269* 03 11 06.45 +21 52 58.8 14.4 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9269,14.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4269 14.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4269 2461290.9269 14.45 03:46:20.70 +16:50:58.7
172.01747 -28.90520 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.131 Vala -1 -1 1 14.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:20.70 +16:50:58.7: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:20.70 +16:50:58.7: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4269* 03 46 20.70 +16 50 58.7 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9269,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4269 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4269 2461290.9269 14.60 03:25:57.62 +19:10:40.9
166.09135 -30.45557 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.586 Thekla -0 -1 1 14.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:57.62 +19:10:40.9: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:57.62 +19:10:40.9: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4269* 03 25 57.62 +19 10 40.9 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9269,14.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4269 14.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4269 2461290.9269 14.66 04:07:30.59 +22:07:13.4
171.73529 -21.65457 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.162 Laurentia -1 -1 1 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:07:30.59 +22:07:13.4: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:07:30.59 +22:07:13.4: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4269* 04 07 30.59 +22 07 13.4 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9269,14.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4269 14.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4269 2461290.9269 14.71 04:12:31.46 +17:31:30.9
176.26889 -23.89887 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1171 Rusthawelia -1 -1 1 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:12:31.46 +17:31:30.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:12:31.46 +17:31:30.9: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4269* 04 12 31.46 +17 31 30.9 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9269,14.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4269 14.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4269 2461290.9269 14.81 03:36:58.01 +25:51:16.9
163.45410 -23.70829 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.613 Ginevra -1 0 1 14.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:36:58.01 +25:51:16.9: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:36:58.01 +25:51:16.9: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4269* 03 36 58.01 +25 51 16.9 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9269,14.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4269 14.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4269 2461290.9269 15.07 03:44:41.71 +20:46:49.7
168.62924 -26.33720 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.859 Bouzareah 1 -1 1 15.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:41.71 +20:46:49.7: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:41.71 +20:46:49.7: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4269* 03 44 41.71 +20 46 49.7 15.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9269,15.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4269 15.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.4269 2461290.9269 12.60 03:36:11.24 +20:58:40.0
166.82829 -27.52477 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.64 Angelina -1 -1 1 12.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:36:11.24 +20:58:40.0: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:36:11.24 +20:58:40.0: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.4269* 03 36 11.24 +20 58 40.0 12.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.9269,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.4269 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461290.92725122 07.09.2026 10:15:04.505 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11343
Objects passed selection criteria: 11338
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10773.5
Average stars matched: 10533.8 (97.7746 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236628 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 7 05:17:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461290.92725122 07.09.2026 10:15:04.505 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 124
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 70351
Objects passed selection criteria: 70188
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 66890
Average stars matched: 64517 (96.4524 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 522376 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 7 05:18:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461290.92659589
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:14.551 +21:57:58.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:14.551 +21:57:58.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0789 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:17.305 +21:58:31.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:17.305 +21:58:31.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0657 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:14.551 +21:57:58.92
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:17.305 +21:58:31.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01388 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Dcc3HV63KB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2NgE8aZkKs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NRMWwT2at7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yE1x7ZfKK7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.5175 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.5175 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4761 out of 5130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5130 out of 11315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Dcc3HV63KB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=882, bad_region=0, passed=11324
Got 11324 stars (including 10422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1548 n_q2=1222 n_q3=1071 n_q4=1082 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2NgE8aZkKs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=0, passed=11315
Got 11315 stars (including 10408 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=1546 n_q2=1221 n_q3=1073 n_q4=1081 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.338
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NRMWwT2at7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=658, bad_region=0, passed=10305
Got 10305 stars (including 9638 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10305 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10305 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10305 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10305 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4917 stars left (next iteration limit 5408)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=9.669 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.399 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=0.372 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.395 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=0.267 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.299 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4917 robust_rms_before=1.270 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.287 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.267 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.316 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.299
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.316 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits N_match=4917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1112 n_q2=1055 n_q3=1220 n_q4=1530 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.yE1x7ZfKK7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=647, bad_region=1, passed=10370
Got 10370 stars (including 9714 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10370 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4919 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=9.652 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.538 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.350 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.365 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.245 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.267 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4919 robust_rms_before=1.248 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.265 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.245 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.294 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.267
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.294 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits N_match=4919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.242 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=1111 n_q2=1060 n_q3=1209 n_q4=1539 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.278
ref2=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.338
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits sigma_overall=0.298 worst_q_ratio=1.117
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits sigma_overall=0.272 worst_q_ratio=1.127
reference average sigma_overall=0.3005 worst_q_ratio=1.308
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (4923 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (4921 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424_astrometric_residuals.png (4917 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425_astrometric_residuals.png (4919 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-14-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_051546_TTUQ1b1x1_3821620_sZm35ae2/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:13.13 +22:06:37.4: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:03.40 +21:54:04.9: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.4: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:30.56 +25:19:56.2: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.4: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:30.56 +25:19:56.2: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:03.40 +21:54:04.9: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:13.13 +22:06:37.4: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.4: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4609 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:03.40 +21:54:04.9: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4763 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:30.56 +25:19:56.2: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3627 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:13.13 +22:06:37.4: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3382 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20578_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
Preparing report for the candidate 20578_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20647_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 20647_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.60 +24:42:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20733_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 20733_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20741_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 20741_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20759_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 20759_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20761_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 20761_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86939_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 86939_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86940_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 86940_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86941_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 86941_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86947_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 86947_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86950_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 86950_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86955_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 86955_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86957_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 86957_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86962_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 86962_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86969_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 86969_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86982_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 86982_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86986_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 86986_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86990_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 86990_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86991_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 86991_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86993_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 86993_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:56.96 +25:06:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86996_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 86996_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:15:57.76 +18:58:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86999_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 86999_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87001_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87001_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87003_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87003_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:23.88 +18:13:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87007_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
Preparing report for the candidate 87007_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87082_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87082_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.60 +24:42:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87220_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87220_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87271_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
Preparing report for the candidate 87271_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87274_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87274_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87383_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87383_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:56.24 +23:09:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87399_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87399_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87424_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87424_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87431_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87431_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:08.42 +23:20:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87459_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87459_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87462_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87462_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:12.56 +26:35:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87484_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87484_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:00.72 +19:54:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87495_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
Preparing report for the candidate 87495_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87528_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87528_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:59.98 +18:28:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87532_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
Preparing report for the candidate 87532_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87645_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87645_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87654_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87654_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87674_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87674_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87760_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87760_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:52.49 +25:19:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87803_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87803_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87807_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87807_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87812_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87812_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87836_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87836_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87842_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
Preparing report for the candidate 87842_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87850_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87850_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87874_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87874_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87890_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87890_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:25:11.69 +19:50:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87905_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87905_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87914_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87914_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87918_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87918_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87921_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
Preparing report for the candidate 87921_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87954_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87954_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87955_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87955_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87956_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87956_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87970_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
Preparing report for the candidate 87970_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87985_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87985_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:44.86 +24:28:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87989_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87989_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87998_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 87998_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:18.21 +26:26:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88006_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88006_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88017_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88017_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88034_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88034_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88054_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88054_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88075_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
Preparing report for the candidate 88075_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88085_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
Preparing report for the candidate 88085_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88092_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88092_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88113_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88113_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88140_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88140_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88143_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88143_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88180_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
Preparing report for the candidate 88180_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88201_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88201_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88214_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
Preparing report for the candidate 88214_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88225_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88225_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88234_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88234_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88240_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88240_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88246_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88246_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88263_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88263_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88281_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88281_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88288_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88288_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88301_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88301_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88307_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88307_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88324_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88324_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88328_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88328_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88329_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88329_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88330_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88330_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88347_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88347_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88372_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88372_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88377_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88377_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88389_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88389_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88391_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88391_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88401_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88401_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88409_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88409_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88420_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88420_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88424_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88424_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88430_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88430_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88440_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88440_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88444_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
Preparing report for the candidate 88444_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88447_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88447_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88448_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88448_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88451_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88451_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88452_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88452_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88456_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88456_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88460_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88460_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88468_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88468_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88471_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88471_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88474_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88474_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88475_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88475_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88480_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88480_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88482_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88482_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88503_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88503_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88526_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88526_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88533_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88533_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88555_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 88555_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-07_05-15-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
