This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.8899,6.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.3899 6.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.3899 2461290.8899 11.12 07:11:47.39 +22:04:54.1
195.08934 14.15563 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe -0 -0 0 11.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:47.39 +22:04:54.1: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:47.39 +22:04:54.1: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.8899,11.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.3899 11.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.8899,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.3899 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.8899,7.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.3899 7.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.3899 2461290.8899 12.02 07:11:59.54 +23:40:26.1
193.60290 14.83851 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania 0 0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:59.54 +23:40:26.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:59.54 +23:40:26.1: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.8899,12.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.3899 12.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.3899 2461290.8899 13.07 07:25:14.12 +24:32:12.3
193.99977 17.95806 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.111 Ate -0 0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:25:14.12 +24:32:12.3: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:25:14.12 +24:32:12.3: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.8899,13.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.3899 13.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.3899 2461290.8899 13.16 07:21:22.41 +18:01:54.3
199.85361 14.55874 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.114 Kassandra -1 -1 1 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:22.41 +18:01:54.3: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:22.41 +18:01:54.3: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.8899,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.3899 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.3899 2461290.8899 13.61 07:04:07.29 +18:45:31.9
197.42439 11.14263 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.308 Polyxo 0 -0 0 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:07.29 +18:45:31.9: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:07.29 +18:45:31.9: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.8899,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.3899 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.3899 2461290.8899 13.56 07:21:46.31 +23:57:29.7
194.24363 17.00735 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.579 Sidonia 1 0 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:46.31 +23:57:29.7: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:46.31 +23:57:29.7: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.8899,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.3899 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461290.89016355 07.09.2026 09:21:40.131 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 17115
Objects passed selection criteria: 17020
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11123.2
Average stars matched: 10196.2 (91.6661 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 242292 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 7 04:24:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461290.89016355 07.09.2026 09:21:40.131 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 111
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 34 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 120177
Objects passed selection criteria: 119784
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 82808.5
Average stars matched: 74517.2 (89.9874 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 574948 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 7 04:26:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461290.88963968
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
Image size: 941.1'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:01.445 +21:59:26.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:01.445 +21:59:26.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0131 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Image size: 940.9'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:04.400 +21:59:05.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:04.400 +21:59:05.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0152 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:01.445 +21:59:26.18
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:04.400 +21:59:05.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01281 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m5mSxpAzL5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9LNV8kIkA7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z4LN1LGajc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZZ4PreRnsq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.922900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.922900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.m5mSxpAzL5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=7924, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 14270 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4839 stars left (next iteration limit 5322)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4839 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1308 n_q2=959 n_q3=1508 n_q4=1064 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9LNV8kIkA7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=7854, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 14073 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4834 stars left (next iteration limit 5317)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4834 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1295 n_q2=958 n_q3=1508 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.z4LN1LGajc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=534, bad_region=935, passed=7646
Got 7646 stars (including 6270 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7646 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4774 stars left (next iteration limit 5250)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=5.768 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.142 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.623 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.821 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.492 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.525 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4774 robust_rms_before=1.708 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.526 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.492 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.594 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.525
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
Image size: 941.7'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:01.553 +21:59:24.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7646 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2824818.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.708 -> 0.492 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits N_match=4774 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=1818 n_q2=624 n_q3=1706 n_q4=626 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZZ4PreRnsq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=519, bad_region=906, passed=7672
Got 7672 stars (including 6318 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7672 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4770 stars left (next iteration limit 5245)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=5.864 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.204 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=0.612 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.766 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=0.483 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.522 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4770 robust_rms_before=1.639 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.528 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.483 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.582 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.522
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Image size: 941.6'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:04.502 +21:59:03.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7672 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2824828.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.639 -> 0.483 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits N_match=4770 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.468 n_q1=1811 n_q2=621 n_q3=1710 n_q4=628 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.224
ref2=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.433 worst_q_ratio=1.281
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits sigma_overall=0.532 worst_q_ratio=1.113
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits sigma_overall=0.519 worst_q_ratio=1.113
reference average sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.2525
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4839 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4834 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441_astrometric_residuals.png (4774 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442_astrometric_residuals.png (4770 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:32.40 +23:01:31.1: 11.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.4: 10.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:47.39 +22:04:54.1: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.41 +22:51:39.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.82 +22:54:43.0: 10.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.4: 10.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:32.40 +23:01:31.1: 11.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:47.39 +22:04:54.1: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.4: ref_mag=10.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.1450 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:32.40 +23:01:31.1: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2823 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.41 +22:51:39.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.41 +22:51:39.9: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.82 +22:54:43.0: 10.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.82 +22:54:43.0: ref_mag=10.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.6307 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32758.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30878_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
Preparing report for the candidate 30878_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31109_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 31109_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31194_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 31194_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.11 +25:59:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31930_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 31930_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32667_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 32667_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32758_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
Preparing report for the candidate 32758_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32965_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 32965_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33143_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 33143_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.47 +24:13:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33209_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 33209_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.90 +22:56:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:11:47.39 +22:04:54.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
Image size: 941.7'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:01.553 +21:59:24.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:01.553 +21:59:24.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0132 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Image size: 941.6'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:04.502 +21:59:03.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:04.502 +21:59:03.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0157 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:01.553 +21:59:24.47
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:04.502 +21:59:03.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01278 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.81y7bIOxCG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9TiUHRlINL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits &> /tmp/tmp.avn3s76oSt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aOVYdAKkDV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.772750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.772750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 97 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.81y7bIOxCG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=17705, bad_region=41121, passed=151473
Got 151473 stars (including 98315 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=1345 n_q2=911 n_q3=1579 n_q4=1018 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9TiUHRlINL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=43, blended=17785, bad_region=41723, passed=153562
Got 153562 stars (including 99663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153562 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1334 n_q2=911 n_q3=1578 n_q4=1030 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.avn3s76oSt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=3085, bad_region=3322, passed=58944
Got 58944 stars (including 52709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58944 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4773 stars left (next iteration limit 5252)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=5.769 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.679 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.612 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.797 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.484 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.512 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4773 robust_rms_before=0.485 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.488 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.484 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.513 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.512
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.513 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits N_match=4773 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.440 n_q1=1803 n_q2=621 n_q3=1684 n_q4=665 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aOVYdAKkDV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=4, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=3071, bad_region=3323, passed=58644
Got 58644 stars (including 52415 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58644 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4767 stars left (next iteration limit 5243)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=5.798 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.937 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.597 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.755 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.478 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.496 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4767 robust_rms_before=0.477 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.497 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.478 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.496 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.496
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.496 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits N_match=4767 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=1792 n_q2=632 n_q3=1683 n_q4=660 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-20-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_042213_TTUQ2b1x1_2794514_Tl5DbsSs/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:10.97 +23:57:27.0: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:09:22.34 +21:13:55.6: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:32.87 +23:44:04.7: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:49.32 +19:58:19.9: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:10:13.07 +23:34:52.9: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:25.97 +20:54:37.6: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:27.90 +22:56:47.4: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:13.26 +21:35:23.2: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:05.38 +26:01:17.7: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:15:32.87 +23:44:04.7: 13.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:25.97 +20:54:37.6: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:32:10.97 +23:57:27.0: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:10:13.07 +23:34:52.9: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:09:22.34 +21:13:55.6: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:10.97 +23:57:27.0: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9967 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:25.97 +20:54:37.6: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1927 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:18:27.90 +22:56:47.4: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:13.26 +21:35:23.2: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:32.87 +23:44:04.7: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2764 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:13:49.32 +19:58:19.9: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:10:13.07 +23:34:52.9: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0043 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:22.34 +21:13:55.6: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9523 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:27.90 +22:56:47.4: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5716 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:13.26 +21:35:23.2: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8988 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:49.32 +19:58:19.9: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4460 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:15:05.38 +26:01:17.7: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:05.38 +26:01:17.7: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0486 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:16.31 +18:59:01.3: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.29 +19:41:48.8: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.26 +25:15:45.2: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:16.31 +18:59:01.3: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:16.31 +18:59:01.3: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7693 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:01.29 +19:41:48.8: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.29 +19:41:48.8: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6123 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:59.54 +23:40:26.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:01.26 +25:15:45.2: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.26 +25:15:45.2: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7408 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.5: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:59.54 +23:40:26.1: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.84 +22:50:51.1: 10.81 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:58.09 +25:16:53.9: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:46.69 +23:15:28.8: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.84 +22:50:51.1: 10.81 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:40.07 +23:05:34.3: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.81 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.84 +22:50:51.1: ref_mag=10.81 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.4976 delta=-1.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:35.08 +19:24:26.4: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:58.09 +25:16:53.9: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:26:19.05 +25:55:36.1: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:58.09 +25:16:53.9: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6431 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:40:46.69 +23:15:28.8: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:46.69 +23:15:28.8: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4322 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:41:40.07 +23:05:34.3: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:35.08 +19:24:26.4: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:40.07 +23:05:34.3: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3215 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:35.08 +19:24:26.4: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4278 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:26:19.05 +25:55:36.1: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:19.05 +25:55:36.1: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6908 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:46.89 +22:42:06.9: 12.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:46.89 +22:42:06.9: 12.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:46.89 +22:42:06.9: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7884 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:06.35 +18:39:20.1: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:22.39 +20:30:18.7: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:12:45.76 +25:33:02.8: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:08.80 +23:56:51.3: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:41.62 +24:40:37.5: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:06.35 +18:39:20.1: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:06.35 +18:39:20.1: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8887 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:22.39 +20:30:18.7: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:12:45.76 +25:33:02.8: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:32:08.80 +23:56:51.3: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:22.39 +20:30:18.7: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9362 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:45.76 +25:33:02.8: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0063 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:08.80 +23:56:51.3: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7778 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:28:41.62 +24:40:37.5: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:41.62 +24:40:37.5: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8391 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:01.22 +23:55:51.7: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:27:01.22 +23:55:51.7: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:01.22 +23:55:51.7: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9505 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:25:14.12 +24:32:12.3: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:25:14.12 +24:32:12.3: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:11.07 +20:06:29.1: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:11.07 +20:06:29.1: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:39.59 +22:49:42.4: 12.91 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:11.07 +20:06:29.1: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2204 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:22.41 +18:01:54.3: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:29.27 +22:51:11.8: 13.70 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:39.59 +22:49:42.4: 12.99 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:39.59 +22:49:42.4: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.4697 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:22.41 +18:01:54.3: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:17.09 +22:39:54.5: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:29.27 +22:51:11.8: 13.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:29.27 +22:51:11.8: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=13.5713 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:16:17.09 +22:39:54.5: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:09:27.06 +23:56:44.7: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:17.09 +22:39:54.5: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3156 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:09:27.06 +23:56:44.7: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:27.06 +23:56:44.7: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4994 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:07.29 +18:45:31.9: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:00.94 +20:13:25.4: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:46.31 +23:57:29.7: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:38.03 +24:18:38.7: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:07.29 +18:45:31.9: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:18.92 +22:52:13.6: 9.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:00.94 +20:13:25.4: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:00.94 +20:13:25.4: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3552 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:46.31 +23:57:29.7: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:38.03 +24:18:38.7: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:38.03 +24:18:38.7: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7606 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:18.92 +22:52:13.6: 11.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:00.76 +23:01:53.7: 13.11 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.07 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:18.92 +22:52:13.6: ref_mag=11.07 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.8053 delta=-2.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:41.37 +22:55:55.1: 13.59 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:00.76 +23:01:53.7: 13.07 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:41.37 +22:55:55.1: 13.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:00.76 +23:01:53.7: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.0319 delta=-0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:41.37 +22:55:55.1: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=13.8865 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:55.85 +23:00:52.6: 12.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:55.85 +23:00:52.6: 12.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out192569.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176199.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out184227.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186774.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out189329.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out189713.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171760_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 171760_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171768_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
Preparing report for the candidate 171768_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171769_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 171769_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171777_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 171777_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171779_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 171779_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171789_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 171789_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171793_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 171793_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171796_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 171796_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:51.68 +20:05:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171797_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 171797_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171799_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 171799_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171800_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 171800_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171803_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 171803_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171804_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 171804_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171805_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 171805_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171808_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 171808_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:17.24 +19:25:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171811_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 171811_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:26.22 +20:27:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171821_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
Preparing report for the candidate 171821_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173631_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 173631_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:47.37 +22:04:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174121_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 174121_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.90 +22:56:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174487_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 174487_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.56 +22:51:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175606_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 175606_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175848_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 175848_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.22 +24:07:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175951_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 175951_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.55 +22:52:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176199_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
Preparing report for the candidate 176199_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176378_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 176378_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.13 +22:38:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176944_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 176944_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.41 +22:56:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177978_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 177978_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:37.90 +19:42:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178139_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 178139_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179007_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 179007_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.92 +23:02:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179094_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 179094_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:40.87 +22:57:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179117_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 179117_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179785_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 179785_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179831_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 179831_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.38 +25:56:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179987_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 179987_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180049_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 180049_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180253_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 180253_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:48.41 +20:26:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180267_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 180267_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180411_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 180411_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.46 +21:18:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180556_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 180556_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181390_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 181390_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:45.76 +23:15:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181446_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 181446_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.14 +22:10:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181561_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 181561_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181657_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 181657_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.15 +22:57:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181688_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 181688_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181929_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 181929_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.14 +22:43:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182048_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 182048_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182104_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 182104_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182406_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 182406_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182678_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 182678_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.78 +18:51:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182833_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 182833_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.14 +22:52:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183094_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 183094_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183407_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 183407_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.82 +22:49:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184152_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 184152_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.61 +22:49:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184227_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
Preparing report for the candidate 184227_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184512_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 184512_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184804_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 184804_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:51.15 +17:46:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184930_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 184930_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:03.49 +19:28:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185145_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 185145_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.10 +22:57:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185379_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 185379_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:11.14 +24:39:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185773_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 185773_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:26.13 +22:50:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185892_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 185892_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:20.38 +24:26:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186182_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 186182_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:09.55 +19:03:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186211_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 186211_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.20 +22:57:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186547_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 186547_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186774_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
Preparing report for the candidate 186774_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186813_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 186813_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:57.93 +19:47:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186902_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 186902_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.67 +20:31:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187104_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 187104_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187122_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 187122_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187369_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 187369_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:50.40 +25:56:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187471_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 187471_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.41 +20:05:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187581_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 187581_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187662_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 187662_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.16 +22:51:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188178_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 188178_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.04 +21:35:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188241_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 188241_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:33.64 +22:39:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188301_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 188301_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:45.51 +20:26:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188338_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 188338_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.70 +19:56:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189100_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 189100_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.71 +20:49:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189153_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 189153_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.78 +22:50:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189329_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
Preparing report for the candidate 189329_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189434_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 189434_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189458_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 189458_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189713_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
Preparing report for the candidate 189713_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191182_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 191182_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191362_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 191362_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.55 +23:02:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191636_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 191636_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:38.07 +22:55:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191800_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 191800_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:33.81 +24:10:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192214_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 192214_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192275_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 192275_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192365_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 192365_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:59.37 +22:48:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192569_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 192569_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:55.85 +23:00:52.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.346 3368423042143286784 106.48267752934 +23.01451938477 14.1763 13.7119 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.346#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192580_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 192580_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:34.86 +22:52:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106224_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 106224_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:11.58 +19:32:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171432_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 171432_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.10 +25:59:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 163170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.61 +24:13:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442
The candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_04-21-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0442 did not pass the final checks
