This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.2290 2461290.7290 11.85 20:55:47.79 -08:40:26.1
39.57174 -31.53920 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.389 Industria -0 0 0 12.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:47.79 -08:40:26.1: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:47.79 -08:40:26.1: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.7290,11.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.2290 11.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.2290 2461290.7290 11.26 20:27:58.73 -10:43:30.3
34.05432 -26.25767 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J202759-1043.5
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.250 V Y 0.750 V 2452299.20000 96.153847000000 M3/4
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:58.73 -10:43:30.3: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:58.73 -10:43:30.3: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.2290* 20 27 58.73 -10 43 30.3 11.3 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J202759-1043.5,2461290.7290,11.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J202759-1043.5 20260907.2290 11.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.2290 2461290.7290 13.80 20:41:19.07 -06:34:40.9
39.85351 -27.39163 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.582 Olympia -2 2 2 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:41:19.07 -06:34:40.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:41:19.07 -06:34:40.9: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.7290,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.2290 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.2290 2461290.7290 13.12 20:34:06.11 -10:18:10.0
35.20103 -27.43955 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.490 Veritas -0 -0 0 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:34:06.11 -10:18:10.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:34:06.11 -10:18:10.0: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 07.2290* 20 34 06.11 -10 18 10.0 13.1 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.7290,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.2290 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.2290 2461290.7290 13.26 20:53:41.83 -12:49:22.0
34.88090 -32.85282 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.38 Leda 0 -0 0 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:41.83 -12:49:22.0: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:41.83 -12:49:22.0: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.7290,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.2290 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461290.72928528 07.09.2026 05:30:00.248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10412
Objects passed selection criteria: 10396
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8867.25
Average stars matched: 8642.5 (97.4654 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 237292 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 7 00:46:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461290.72928528 07.09.2026 05:30:00.248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 137
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 54 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 69643
Objects passed selection criteria: 69526
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 63447
Average stars matched: 61337.2 (96.6748 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 532676 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 7 00:48:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461290.72872832
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.762 -09:59:54.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:16.762 -09:59:54.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0223 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:14.048 -09:59:15.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:14.048 -09:59:15.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0146 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:16.762 -09:59:54.52
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:14.048 -09:59:15.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01551 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UpMc6SFiOb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cti733Uer5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1bLWESutb9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xbDjB0yDwQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.734000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.734000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7839 out of 8130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8130 out of 14495 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.0 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.UpMc6SFiOb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=755, bad_region=3560, passed=14476
Got 14476 stars (including 10329 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1501 n_q2=996 n_q3=1414 n_q4=964 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.cti733Uer5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=763, bad_region=3538, passed=14495
Got 14495 stars (including 10373 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1511 n_q2=992 n_q3=1419 n_q4=958 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1bLWESutb9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=492, bad_region=2082, passed=9107
Got 9107 stars (including 6630 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9107 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7493 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7493 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7493 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=6.511 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.066 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.421 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.353 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.377 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=0.740 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.373 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.353 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.399 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.377
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.399 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.405 n_q1=1426 n_q2=968 n_q3=1507 n_q4=972 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.041
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xbDjB0yDwQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=524, bad_region=2086, passed=8905
Got 8905 stars (including 6403 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8905 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7270 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7270 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7270 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4872 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=6.620 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=7.887 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.440 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.405 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4872 robust_rms_before=0.764 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.394 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.424 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.405
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.424 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits N_match=4872 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.466 n_q1=1422 n_q2=956 n_q3=1507 n_q4=987 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits sigma_overall=0.265 worst_q_ratio=1.163
ref2=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits sigma_overall=0.277 worst_q_ratio=1.138
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.041
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits sigma_overall=0.428 worst_q_ratio=1.088
reference average sigma_overall=0.271 worst_q_ratio=1.1505
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212_astrometric_residuals.png (4872 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-29-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0211.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-07_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_003036_TTUQ2b1x1_3237303_eOgM9AwO/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:32.0: 10.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:47.79 -08:40:26.1: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:58.73 -10:43:30.3: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:32.0: 10.19 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:47.79 -08:40:26.1: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:58.73 -10:43:30.3: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.20 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:27:58.73 -10:43:30.3: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2572 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:32.0: ref_mag=10.20 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4167 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08626.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20849.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20676_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 20676_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20693_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 20693_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:36.75 -12:31:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20828_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 20828_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:59:00.65 -07:32:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20849_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
Preparing report for the candidate 20849_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111575_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111575_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111587_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111587_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111589_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111589_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111590_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111590_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111595_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111595_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111597_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111597_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111598_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111598_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111599_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111599_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111602_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111602_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111603_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111603_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111606_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111606_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111612_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111612_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111613_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111613_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111624_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111624_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111626_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111626_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111629_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111629_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111634_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111634_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111637_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
Preparing report for the candidate 111637_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111639_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111639_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111641_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111641_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111648_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111648_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111650_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111650_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111654_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111654_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111655_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111655_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111657_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111657_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111659_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111659_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111662_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111662_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111666_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111666_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111671_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111671_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111673_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111673_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111674_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111674_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111675_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111675_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111677_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111677_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111680_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111680_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111684_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111684_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111687_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111687_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111850_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111850_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:40.65 -08:56:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111855_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111855_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:55:47.78 -08:40:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111956_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 111956_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:03.66 -12:35:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112102_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112102_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112107_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112107_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:06.01 -12:35:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112110_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112110_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112148_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
Preparing report for the candidate 112148_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112177_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
Preparing report for the candidate 112177_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112233_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112233_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:38:46.55 -12:45:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112240_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112240_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112282_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112282_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112284_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112284_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112293_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112293_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:54.00 -07:43:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112317_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112317_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112343_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112343_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112349_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112349_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112367_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112367_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112395_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112395_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112399_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112399_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112406_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112406_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112420_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112420_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112431_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112431_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:45:24.64 -10:00:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112490_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112490_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:26.69 -06:23:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112529_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112529_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112550_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112550_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112555_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112555_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112566_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112566_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112567_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112567_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112576_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112576_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112578_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112578_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112594_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112594_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112627_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112627_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112631_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112631_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112723_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112723_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112731_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112731_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112772_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112772_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112782_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112782_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112824_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112824_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112841_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112841_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112843_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112843_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112864_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112864_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112873_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112873_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112903_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112903_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112915_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112915_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:40.74 -09:18:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112920_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112920_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112935_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112935_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112947_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112947_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112949_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112949_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112951_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112951_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112957_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112957_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112970_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112970_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112980_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112980_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112996_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 112996_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113000_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 113000_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113004_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 113004_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113008_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 113008_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113033_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 113033_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113051_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 113051_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113069_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 113069_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113075_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 113075_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60352_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 60352_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25145_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 25145_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:59:00.64 -07:32:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60527_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 60527_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:58.74 -10:43:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:13.33 -07:21:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69949_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212
The candidate 69949_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-07_00-30-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks