This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.0816 2461290.5816 12.06 17:36:53.38 -09:15:54.3
15.86529 11.96362 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.216 Kleopatra 0 0 0 12.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:36:53.38 -09:15:54.3: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:36:53.38 -09:15:54.3: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.5816,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.0816 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 07.0816 2461290.5816 13.27 16:49:44.07 -07:50:13.1
10.64500 22.60185 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche -0 -0 0 13.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:49:44.07 -07:50:13.1: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:49:44.07 -07:50:13.1: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461290.5816,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260907.0816 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.73999438 13.07.2026 05:45:25.514 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
First image: 2461234.73999438 13.07.2026 05:45:25.514 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Last image: 2461290.58186824 07.09.2026 01:57:43.416 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.71
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7081
Objects passed selection criteria: 7059
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5299.5
Average stars matched: 5122.5 (96.6601 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233296 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 6 21:00:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.73999438 13.07.2026 05:45:25.514 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
First image: 2461234.73999438 13.07.2026 05:45:25.514 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Last image: 2461290.58186824 07.09.2026 01:57:43.416 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 98
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 67924
Objects passed selection criteria: 67811
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 56437.8
Average stars matched: 53775.8 (95.2833 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 288592 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 6 21:01:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461290.58134536
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.764 -09:59:49.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:35.080 -09:59:51.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.764 -09:59:49.68
Second-epoch image center 17:08:35.080 -09:59:51.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0014 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:32.744 -09:59:54.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.764 -09:59:49.68
Second-epoch image center 17:08:32.744 -09:59:54.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0084 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:35.080 -09:59:51.82
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:32.744 -09:59:54.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00961 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A570FaC3qD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n6Jou38aiu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3YmKj90VuB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H6i0BrqLCQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7326 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0927 to 265.2330 deg, Dec -15.2610 to -4.7059 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0927 to 265.2330 deg, Dec -15.2610 to -4.7059 deg
Loaded 4092 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3407 out of 3536 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3536 out of 7326 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.683900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.683900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.71
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7326 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0927 to 265.2330 deg, Dec -15.2610 to -4.7059 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0927 to 265.2330 deg, Dec -15.2610 to -4.7059 deg
Loaded 4092 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3407 out of 3536 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3536 out of 7326 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 7427 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0927 to 265.2378 deg, Dec -15.2499 to -4.7061 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0927 to 265.2378 deg, Dec -15.2499 to -4.7061 deg
Loaded 4090 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3396 out of 3529 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3529 out of 7427 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
2.2 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
15.0 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.A570FaC3qD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=430, bad_region=0, passed=7326
Got 7326 stars (including 6888 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7326 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4798 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4750 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4750 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4797 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4749 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4749 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4749 stars left (next iteration limit 5225)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits N_match=4749 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.635 n_q1=934 n_q2=1126 n_q3=1731 n_q4=958 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.n6Jou38aiu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=444, bad_region=0, passed=7427
Got 7427 stars (including 6977 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7427 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4749 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4748 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4748 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4748 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4748 stars left (next iteration limit 5222)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits N_match=4748 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.632 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.657 n_q1=940 n_q2=1118 n_q3=1731 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3YmKj90VuB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=250, bad_region=0, passed=3269
Got 3269 stars (including 3015 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3269 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 2873 stars left (next iteration limit 3159)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2873 robust_rms=13.718 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.922 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2873 robust_rms=0.502 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.549 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2873 robust_rms=0.348 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.376 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2873 robust_rms_before=0.808 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.434 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.348 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.487 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.376
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:35.076 -09:59:52.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3269 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3789248.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.808 -> 0.348 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits N_match=2873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.379 n_q1=448 n_q2=655 n_q3=1128 n_q4=642 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.H6i0BrqLCQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=243, bad_region=0, passed=3321
Got 3321 stars (including 3073 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3321 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3321 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3321 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3321 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 2928 stars left (next iteration limit 3219)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2928 robust_rms=13.824 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.004 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2928 robust_rms=0.491 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.520 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2928 robust_rms=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.408 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2928 robust_rms_before=0.786 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.437 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.527 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.408
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:32.739 -09:59:54.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3321 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3789240.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.786 -> 0.352 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits N_match=2928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=468 n_q2=682 n_q3=1130 n_q4=648 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits sigma_overall=0.574 worst_q_ratio=1.107
ref2=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits sigma_overall=0.569 worst_q_ratio=1.154
new1=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.212
new2=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.171
reference average sigma_overall=0.5715 worst_q_ratio=1.1305
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012_astrometric_residuals.png (4749 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013_astrometric_residuals.png (4748 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008_astrometric_residuals.png (2873 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009_astrometric_residuals.png (2928 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20534_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 20534_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:50.46 -11:59:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20560_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 20560_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:36.15 -05:27:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20646_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 20646_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:57.45 -09:06:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20676_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 20676_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:41.10 -14:05:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06265_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 06265_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:00.93 -15:03:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 20280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:21.59 -05:49:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.764 -09:59:49.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:35.076 -09:59:52.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.764 -09:59:49.68
Second-epoch image center 17:08:35.076 -09:59:52.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0015 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:32.739 -09:59:54.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.764 -09:59:49.68
Second-epoch image center 17:08:32.739 -09:59:54.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0084 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:35.076 -09:59:52.21
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:32.739 -09:59:54.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00962 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lY5wAQJXL6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JBjgmR4dSZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits &> /tmp/tmp.61VURS6YIq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.liVImT19jO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 74385 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0750 to 265.2431 deg, Dec -15.2614 to -4.6930 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0750 to 265.2431 deg, Dec -15.2614 to -4.6930 deg
Loaded 4106 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3164 out of 3624 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3624 out of 74385 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.498300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.498300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 74385 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0750 to 265.2431 deg, Dec -15.2614 to -4.6930 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0750 to 265.2431 deg, Dec -15.2614 to -4.6930 deg
Loaded 4106 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3164 out of 3624 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3624 out of 74385 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 74425 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0774 to 265.2468 deg, Dec -15.2519 to -4.6849 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0774 to 265.2468 deg, Dec -15.2519 to -4.6849 deg
Loaded 4105 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3188 out of 3620 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3620 out of 74425 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 94 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
2.0 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
15.1 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lY5wAQJXL6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=4056, bad_region=1, passed=74370
Got 74370 stars (including 70164 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74370 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4808 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4762 stars left (next iteration limit 5241)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits N_match=4762 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.628 n_q1=994 n_q2=1121 n_q3=1676 n_q4=971 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JBjgmR4dSZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=4093, bad_region=1, passed=74415
Got 74415 stars (including 70204 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4760 stars left (next iteration limit 5238)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits N_match=4760 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.642 n_q1=982 n_q2=1110 n_q3=1696 n_q4=972 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.61VURS6YIq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1201, bad_region=0, passed=38991
Got 38991 stars (including 37702 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38991 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4767 stars left (next iteration limit 5244)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=12.270 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=18.323 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.522 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.548 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.369 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.407 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4767 robust_rms_before=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.409 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.369 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.406 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.407
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.406 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits N_match=4767 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=847 n_q2=1112 n_q3=1805 n_q4=1003 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.liVImT19jO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1166, bad_region=0, passed=39672
Got 39672 stars (including 38412 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39672 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39672 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39672 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39672 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4770 stars left (next iteration limit 5248)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=12.739 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.199 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=0.509 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.518 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=0.365 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.392 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4770 robust_rms_before=0.368 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.365 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.403 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.392
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.403 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits N_match=4770 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.388 n_q1=849 n_q2=1118 n_q3=1788 n_q4=1015 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_205816_TTUQ1b1x1_3645411_oc4YIFq4/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:38:59.22 -07:07:49.6: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:41:07.16 -07:27:38.1: 14.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:21:38.94 -11:01:51.3: 13.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:44:31.03 -10:22:54.2: 14.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:38:33.61 -09:57:14.4: 13.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:38:27.32 -11:27:32.3: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:43:39.59 -05:13:24.6: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:55:16.26 -06:22:11.5: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:38:33.61 -09:57:14.4: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:38:59.22 -07:07:49.6: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:21:38.94 -11:01:51.3: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:44:31.03 -10:22:54.2: 14.29 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:41:07.16 -07:27:38.1: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:38:27.32 -11:27:32.3: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:33.61 -09:57:14.4: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7059 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:59.22 -07:07:49.6: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7174 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:38.94 -11:01:51.3: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0394 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:07.16 -07:27:38.1: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0182 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:31.03 -10:22:54.2: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2336 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:27.32 -11:27:32.3: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7194 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:58:27.26 -06:05:58.1: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:55:16.26 -06:22:11.5: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:16.26 -06:22:11.5: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4628 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:43:39.59 -05:13:24.6: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:39.59 -05:13:24.6: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4560 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:58:27.26 -06:05:58.1: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:27.26 -06:05:58.1: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1586 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:44:19.07 -08:04:32.7: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:59:11.21 -06:44:34.7: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:19:59.07 -08:51:46.2: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:36:53.38 -09:15:54.3: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:44:19.07 -08:04:32.7: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:59:11.21 -06:44:34.7: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:19:59.07 -08:51:46.2: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:19.07 -08:04:32.7: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3298 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:59:11.21 -06:44:34.7: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2271 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:59.07 -08:51:46.2: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2311 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:36:53.38 -09:15:54.3: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:55:09.54 -08:21:00.7: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:49:44.07 -07:50:13.1: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:02:58.67 -06:22:16.6: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:55:09.54 -08:21:00.7: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:09.54 -08:21:00.7: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2418 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:23:55.91 -09:22:22.0: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:49:44.07 -07:50:13.1: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:02:58.67 -06:22:16.6: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:58.67 -06:22:16.6: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2598 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:39:31.24 -14:13:14.7: 14.23 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:23:55.91 -09:22:22.0: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:37:29.95 -13:31:30.2: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:23:55.91 -09:22:22.0: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4781 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:39:31.24 -14:13:14.7: 14.35 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:37:29.95 -13:31:30.2: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:31.24 -14:13:14.7: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7845 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:29.95 -13:31:30.2: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9902 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:37:38.09 -13:59:30.4: 14.28 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:37:38.09 -13:59:30.4: 14.30 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:38.09 -13:59:30.4: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9408 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92839.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out93564.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92416_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92416_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92417_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92417_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92424_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92424_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92425_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92425_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:44.42 -05:55:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92433_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92433_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:20.99 -06:19:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92434_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92434_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92438_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92438_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92440_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92440_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92447_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92447_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:04.79 -11:22:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92452_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92452_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:26.40 -05:25:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92457_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92457_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:20.83 -07:06:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92459_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92459_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92460_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92460_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:55.27 -14:12:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92461_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92461_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92462_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92462_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:09.48 -13:05:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92467_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92467_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92468_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92468_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:23.97 -06:07:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92470_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92470_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:22.55 -05:35:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92474_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92474_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92475_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92475_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92476_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92476_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92477_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92477_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:54.56 -14:52:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92479_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92479_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:45.21 -05:17:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92480_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92480_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:24.87 -07:56:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92481_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92481_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92483_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92483_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:47.57 -04:47:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92484_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92484_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.10 -06:23:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92553_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92553_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:38.37 -15:11:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92756_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92756_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:02.88 -06:04:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92839_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 92839_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92861_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92861_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:17.73 -12:14:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92939_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92939_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:16.82 -07:06:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92988_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 92988_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:15.87 -05:51:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93142_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93142_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:33.38 -14:03:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93181_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93181_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:11.68 -11:22:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93190_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93190_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:46.69 -14:40:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93194_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93194_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:47.90 -14:37:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93200_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93200_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:53.38 -14:47:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93206_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93206_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:32.59 -11:06:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93217_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93217_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:15.53 -13:14:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93254_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93254_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:38.48 -14:39:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93261_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93261_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:18.86 -14:01:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93318_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93318_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:21.09 -08:49:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93326_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93326_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:56.64 -06:07:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93335_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93335_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:09.47 -12:29:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93424_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93424_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:14.54 -14:20:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93451_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93451_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93468_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93468_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:16.08 -12:32:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93469_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93469_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:56.71 -06:46:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93488_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93488_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:45.62 -08:23:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93521_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93521_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:47.57 -08:10:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93564_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 93564_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93580_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93580_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:50.20 -15:00:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93583_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93583_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:45.87 -11:46:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93624_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93624_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:01.70 -14:05:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93666_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93666_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:02.32 -11:26:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93683_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93683_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:25.74 -14:10:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93686_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93686_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93768_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93768_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:05.12 -10:41:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93805_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93805_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:44.68 -05:37:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93820_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93820_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93910_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93910_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:37.52 -08:12:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93942_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 93942_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:24.19 -14:23:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94005_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 94005_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:44.66 -11:48:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94027_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 94027_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:55.34 -13:02:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94031_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 94031_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:37.06 -12:47:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94110_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 94110_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:23.94 -05:15:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94177_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 94177_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94187_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 94187_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:14.91 -06:19:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94193_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 94193_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94203_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 94203_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:18.02 -13:31:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94263_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 94263_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:00.96 -07:59:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94288_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 94288_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:38.84 -08:08:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94293_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 94293_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:56.27 -08:21:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94314_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 94314_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94355_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 94355_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:37.90 -09:21:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94406_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 94406_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:21.72 -05:43:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53752_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 53752_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:33.78 -13:59:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90510_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 90510_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:00.41 -09:02:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08448_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 08448_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:20.87 -06:13:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09091_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 09091_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:36.01 -06:16:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33802_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 33802_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:15.49 -10:25:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46293_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 46293_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:41.05 -14:05:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54778_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 54778_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:50.47 -11:59:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20910_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 20910_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:26.99 -08:19:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25532_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 25532_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:57.45 -09:06:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05876_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 05876_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:21.68 -05:49:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07292_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 07292_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:43.52 -06:00:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06381_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 06381_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:48.64 -05:50:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33350_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 33350_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:19.92 -10:18:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39620_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 39620_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:00.95 -15:03:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60969_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 60969_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:22.75 -13:42:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47173_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 47173_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:12.99 -13:41:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03935_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 03935_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_20-57-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks