Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 06.4539  2461289.9539  13.91  04:36:13.56 +16:26:50.0
181.07208 -20.22886 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 4.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | ATO J069.0570+16.4370        | 04:36:13.56 +16:26:50.0 (user input)  | dubious (ATLAS)  |   (ATLAS)            |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:36:13.56 +16:26:50.0:  15.10 +/- 0.33  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:36:13.56 +16:26:50.0:  15.20 +/- 0.36  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.15 +/- 0.24
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits


fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits


fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits  wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits -crosshair 6185.61523 4668.29346 image    wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits -crosshair 6190.08057 4667.20752 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 06.45393 04 36 13.56 +16 26 50.0          13.9 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 06.45366 04 36 13.57 +16 26 49.0          14.1 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 09 06.45420 04 36 13.55 +16 26 50.9          13.8 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 09 06.4539*  04 36 13.56 +16 26 50.0  13.9 U             Tau       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J069.0570+16.4370,2461289.9539,13.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J069.0570+16.4370 20260906.4539 13.91CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 reference image: Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 reference image: Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last  image: 2461289.95419605 06.09.2026 10:53:52.539   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.54
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  7708
Objects passed selection criteria:  7681
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 5777.25
Average stars matched: 5417 (93.7643 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   233620 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Sep  2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sun Sep  6 05:58:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last  image: 2461289.95419605 06.09.2026 10:53:52.539   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 89
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  51994
Objects passed selection criteria:  51832
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 39396
Average stars matched: 36799.5 (93.4092 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   271744 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Sep  2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sun Sep  6 05:59:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Tau-06-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Tau-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Tau-06-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 143320 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 143320 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits_preview.png'

Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits


renamed 'Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits_preview.png'

Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 559.8035
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 711.9893
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1200.7843
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 714.3107
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1199.2350
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 713.8870
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.14501
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     22.5900001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 23.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-06T05:53:06.5572885' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-06T10:53:06.5572885' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61289.4535481133 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-06T10:53:16.4588193' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61289.4536627084 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     66.6627014899172 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     13.9999350454095 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     63.1869444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     132.386388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.12011451512777 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Tau-06'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 26 40'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20480 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20480 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     22.5900001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     22.5900001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 15.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 63.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               900.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 23.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/d_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits :)

Spent 0.689039 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/d_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     22.6399993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 23.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-06T05:53:52.5399556' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-06T10:53:52.5399556' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61289.4540803125 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-06T10:54:02.4458093' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61289.4541949653 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =      66.662701400945 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     13.9999350273067 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =               63.305 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     132.708611111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.11895428750094 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Tau-06'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 26 40'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20480 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20480 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     22.6399993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     22.6399993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 15.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 63.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               900.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 23.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/d_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits :)

Spent 0.668369 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/d_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits



fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461289.95366385
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:40.353 +14:00:24.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:40.353 +14:00:24.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0074 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:38.470 +14:00:32.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:38.470 +14:00:32.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0109 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  04:26:40.353 +14:00:24.13
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:38.470 +14:00:32.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00798 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yxID0yn2An
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YMDYWQYvDB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aqPG95gXce
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V0Tom46nvs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.989100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.989100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.54
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.45

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.45

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec +8.6216 to +19.2870 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec 8.6216 to 19.2870 deg
Loaded 4407 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3650 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3650 out of 8488 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.0 pix  Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
 2.0 pix  Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
 15.3 mag.  Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.6 (SNR )  11.9 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.yxID0yn2An (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=728, bad_region=1955, passed=9344
Got 9344 stars (including 6757 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=1649 n_q2=740 n_q3=1787 n_q4=698 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YMDYWQYvDB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=679, bad_region=1868, passed=8488
Got 8488 stars (including 6040 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=1626 n_q2=774 n_q3=1759 n_q4=714 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.402
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aqPG95gXce (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=480, bad_region=2011, passed=6657
Got 6657 stars (including 4329 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6657 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4243 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4232 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4232 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4243 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4232 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4232 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Excluding outliers - 4232 stars left (next iteration limit 4655)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4232 robust_rms=7.195 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.678 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4232 robust_rms=0.664 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.940 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4232 robust_rms=0.414 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.585 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4232 robust_rms_before=1.028 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.412 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.414 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.586 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.585
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.586 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits N_match=4232 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=1306 n_q2=863 n_q3=1240 n_q4=823 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.405
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.V0Tom46nvs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=484, bad_region=1964, passed=6591
Got 6591 stars (including 4305 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6591 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4219 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4208 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4208 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4208 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4219 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4208 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4208 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Excluding outliers - 4208 stars left (next iteration limit 4628)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4208 robust_rms=7.136 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.688 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4208 robust_rms=0.698 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.931 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4208 robust_rms=0.443 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.584 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4208 robust_rms_before=1.072 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.443 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.443 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.583 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.584
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.583 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits N_match=4208 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=1307 n_q2=835 n_q3=1247 n_q4=819 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.300
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.242
ref2=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.402
new1=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits sigma_overall=0.413 worst_q_ratio=1.405
new2=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits sigma_overall=0.455 worst_q_ratio=1.300
reference average sigma_overall=0.3245 worst_q_ratio=1.322
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458_astrometric_residuals.png (4232 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459_astrometric_residuals.png (4208 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    10.32    04:25:27.21 +16:33:21.4   4628 4736   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

**** FOUND  04:25:27.22 +16:33:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:40.353 +14:00:24.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:40.353 +14:00:24.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0074 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:38.470 +14:00:32.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:38.470 +14:00:32.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0109 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  04:26:40.353 +14:00:24.13
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:38.470 +14:00:32.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00798 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lXVLDtezw3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TUJys7GteD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2bfN2koQxT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LUNxVeo1Ee
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.852800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.852800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.62

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.62

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 58309 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec +8.6064 to +19.2869 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec 8.6064 to 19.2869 deg
Loaded 4433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3131 out of 3673 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3673 out of 58309 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=4.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 54 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 1.9 pix  Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
 1.8 pix  Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.6 mag.  Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
 15.5 mag.  Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
 15.0 mag.  fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
 15.0 mag.  fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.0 (SNR )  14.5 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lXVLDtezw3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3506, bad_region=10392, passed=62251
Got 62251 stars (including 48725 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62251 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1624 n_q2=735 n_q3=1801 n_q4=721 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.213
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.TUJys7GteD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=3080, bad_region=9253, passed=58303
Got 58303 stars (including 46293 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58303 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.251 n_q1=1612 n_q2=760 n_q3=1786 n_q4=722 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.387
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2bfN2koQxT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2224, bad_region=12746, passed=41525
Got 41525 stars (including 27252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41525 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 4887 stars left (next iteration limit 5375)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=7.219 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.780 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=0.648 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.921 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=0.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.580 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4887 robust_rms_before=1.073 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.407 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.562 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.580
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.562 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits N_match=4887 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.426 n_q1=1497 n_q2=1082 n_q3=1357 n_q4=951 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.388
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LUNxVeo1Ee (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=2047, bad_region=12847, passed=41873
Got 41873 stars (including 27635 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41873 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=7.209 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.858 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.673 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.923 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.447 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.577 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4889 robust_rms_before=1.108 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.443 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.447 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.573 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.577
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.573 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.448 n_q1=1492 n_q2=1075 n_q3=1362 n_q4=960 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.276
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:16:06.65 +10:24:43.7:  14.22 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:16:06.65 +10:24:43.7:  14.30 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.26 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:06.65 +10:24:43.7: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2227 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:36:13.56 +16:26:50.0:  15.10 +/- 0.33  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:41:26.65 +09:55:55.1:  14.64 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:36:13.56 +16:26:50.0:  15.20 +/- 0.36  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.15 +/- 0.24
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:36:13.56 +16:26:50.0: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.24 new_mean_mag=13.8563 delta=1.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:41:26.65 +09:55:55.1:  14.62 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.63 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:26.65 +09:55:55.1: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4631 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79985.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75343_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 75343_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.08    04:18:14.37 +09:54:47.4   3516 0728   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

**** FOUND  04:18:14.47 +09:54:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75347_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 75347_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 06.45366    2461289.95366    14.16    04:16:06.65 +10:24:42.8   3199 1037   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.32    04:16:06.64 +10:24:44.6   3204 1036   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75682_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 75682_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    10.66    04:20:23.95 +14:03:32.5   3875 3235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77772_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 77772_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    12.91    04:12:34.62 +17:54:15.0   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77983_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 77983_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.14    04:08:33.57 +16:12:07.1   2168 4570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78040_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 78040_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.55    04:44:24.55 +14:05:54.7   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78233_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 78233_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.44    04:38:35.58 +17:25:27.1   6532 5263   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

**** FOUND  04:38:35.56 +17:25:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78322_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 78322_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.45    04:16:43.41 +13:31:43.6   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78330_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 78330_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.34    04:31:15.85 +16:25:40.7   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78341_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 78341_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.42    04:35:56.27 +14:26:04.0   6151 3449   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78438_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 78438_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.48    04:41:29.01 +17:35:58.6   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78576_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 78576_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.48    04:21:28.76 +12:21:23.4   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78615_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 78615_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.65    04:41:37.49 +10:39:51.4   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78616_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 78616_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.56    04:43:20.11 +16:40:09.0   7224 4812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78646_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 78646_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.73    04:41:09.49 +10:21:27.3   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78650_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 78650_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.55    04:33:52.69 +13:15:18.0   5850 2736   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

**** FOUND  04:33:52.72 +13:15:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78684_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 78684_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.58    04:38:11.16 +12:07:29.8   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78777_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 78777_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.67    04:08:36.55 +10:07:41.3   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78789_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 78789_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.70    04:41:17.52 +13:35:21.0   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79330_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 79330_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.91    04:08:58.76 +16:57:19.7   2241 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79460_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 79460_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.60    04:24:15.70 +17:57:56.5   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79520_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 79520_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.89    04:38:33.91 +10:07:38.7   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79535_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 79535_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.87    04:21:31.48 +14:25:56.2   4043 3458   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

**** FOUND  04:21:31.43 +14:25:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79588_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 79588_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.85    04:18:41.93 +10:06:03.2   3587 0841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79649_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 79649_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.86    04:22:43.90 +11:14:00.4   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79669_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 79669_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.84    04:13:06.86 +09:58:27.7   2750 0776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79676_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 79676_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.68    04:10:29.13 +15:03:57.2   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79714_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 79714_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.92    04:30:31.47 +17:00:12.3   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79742_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 79742_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.66    04:09:13.56 +14:25:27.1   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79985_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 79985_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80190_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 80190_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.26    04:15:47.68 +09:51:17.8   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80407_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 80407_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.89    04:10:00.53 +11:59:50.5   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80424_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 80424_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.16    04:24:04.21 +16:54:51.5   4430 4955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80460_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 80460_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.22    04:16:58.21 +10:12:54.8   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80515_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 80515_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    13.91    04:20:16.30 +17:29:37.3   3885 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80676_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 80676_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.01    04:39:59.28 +16:15:20.0   6738 4555   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80735_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 80735_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.59    04:15:42.60 +10:04:28.1   3140 0831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80812_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 80812_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.14    04:36:50.38 +14:59:45.5   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80922_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 80922_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.20    04:44:13.39 +16:26:13.7   7355 4673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81060_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 81060_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.19    04:35:56.83 +17:53:31.5   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81159_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 81159_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.24    04:21:34.45 +17:36:31.5   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81181_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 81181_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.69    04:40:22.21 +16:25:34.6   6793 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81314_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 81314_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.14    04:37:36.20 +13:43:24.5   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81390_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 81390_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.42    04:12:58.91 +17:37:21.7   2832 5415   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81466_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 81466_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 06.45366    2461289.95366    14.69    04:41:26.56 +09:55:54.7   6979 0723   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.36    04:41:26.73 +09:55:55.4   6985 0722   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81477_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 81477_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.50    04:19:23.80 +14:30:14.5   3732 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81534_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 81534_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.39    04:10:21.41 +12:00:44.6   2368 2023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81561_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 81561_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.62    04:35:44.67 +15:41:22.9   6121 4208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81628_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 81628_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    15.06    04:43:27.05 +09:54:34.4   7286 0709   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81710_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 81710_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.68    04:13:34.68 +14:29:47.3   2879 3517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81716_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 81716_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.32    04:25:49.21 +16:40:27.3   4682 4807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81719_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 81719_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.50    04:09:22.05 +16:39:20.1   2293 4842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81852_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 81852_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    14.73    04:09:06.74 +11:50:44.6   2180 1926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81877_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 81877_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 06.45420    2461289.95420    15.13    04:44:50.33 +12:26:24.8   7474 2250   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_055621_TTUQ2b1x1_2631928_c9KzlssI/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-06_05-53-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 14s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:36:13.56 +16:26:50.0
########### Completed Tau-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
04:36:13.56 +16:26:50.0
###################################################################################
04:36:13.56 +16:26:50.0  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
04:36:13.56 +16:26:50.0  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
04:36:13.56 +16:26:50.0  -- not a known variable star
Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
04:36:13.56 +16:26:50.0
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461289.95366385 -observatory V36
11:33:33.51 +04:07:12.7 Mercury (-0.9mag)
13:33:56.65 -14:11:50.0 Venus (-4.7mag)
07:11:42.72 +23:02:04.4 Mars (1.2mag)
09:08:21.36 +17:00:29.1 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:51:55.49 +02:39:60.0 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:13:40.59 +21:01:57.8 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:13:49.55 -00:02:41.4 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:25:39.09 -23:39:25.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
06:55:58.38 +26:30:43.3 Moon (-9.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Sep  6 05:58 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461289.95366385:
09:08:21.22 +17:00:31.3 Io (6.2mag)
09:08:30.37 +16:59:45.7 Europa (6.3mag)
09:08:37.71 +16:59:08.4 Ganymede (5.7mag)
09:07:54.93 +17:02:38.5 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:06:05.96 +17:16:38.5 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:08:22.37 +17:00:24.7 Thebe (16.6mag)
09:05:43.67 +17:10:39.9 Elara (17.7mag)
09:12:16.14 +16:28:19.0 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
09:09:30.06 +17:18:02.0 Carme (19.0mag)
00:51:55.70 +02:40:21.4 Titan (8.3mag)
00:51:50.64 +02:40:05.0 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:52:12.88 +02:42:34.6 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:52:07.67 +02:39:21.7 Hyperion (14.3mag)
00:50:43.14 +02:29:49.0 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep  6 05:58 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461289.95366385:
21:57:01.68 +00:08:02.4 JWST
15:58:44.15 +48:38:18.2 Chandra
06:57:16.71 +00:09:38.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep  6 05:58 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461289.95366385 -observatory V36
03:39:54.65 +19:18:03.5 17.4mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:02:37.35 -34:13:35.2 14.3mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:18:49.85 -70:15:19.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:15:35.63 +33:40:43.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:50:10.42 +45:21:15.4 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
04:50:10.42 +45:21:15.4 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
04:50:10.42 +45:21:15.4 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
04:50:10.42 +45:21:15.4 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:14:09.53 +28:46:20.0 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:09:32.78 +25:59:41.5 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:48:43.27 +27:15:24.1 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:48:08.04 +05:14:15.3 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:29:46.37 -15:34:30.3 14.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:37:39.04 +32:50:27.7 15.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:06:29.57 +15:19:57.9 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:34:09.08 +43:12:20.3 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:27:19.73 +49:20:40.8 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:35:09.19 -13:00:56.0 15.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:11:20.09 +18:42:42.2 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:16:37.76 +18:50:05.1 16.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:18:56.13 +00:11:02.9 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:39:13.53 +74:10:14.1 16.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:06:11.59 +46:09:38.2 17.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:12:29.65 +11:12:49.8 17.5mag A/2026 E1
22:25:17.28 -34:58:37.7 13.4mag 10P/Tempel
01:18:09.25 +36:51:22.5 17.9mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
11:47:36.52 -05:24:18.3 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:06:52.47 -04:49:39.4 17.6mag 63P/Wild
00:45:07.46 -07:00:56.3 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
06:37:41.62 +19:18:57.1 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:17:12.73 +14:59:13.6 16.7mag 88P/Howell
05:35:25.68 +28:18:31.9 17.5mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
07:29:17.54 +25:01:49.2 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
10:26:00.64 +21:02:45.8 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:44:45.06 -21:02:38.5 17.4mag 124P/Mrkos
06:16:23.41 +20:39:54.4 15.9mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
02:35:20.61 -17:42:21.8 15.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:39:15.36 +14:17:39.5 12.0mag 169P/NEAT
03:23:42.50 +08:32:35.0 14.5mag 220P/McNaught
04:45:47.05 +36:03:20.7 15.2mag 260P/McNaught
08:29:36.57 +35:47:23.4 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:24:41.63 -00:09:15.3 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski
09:27:03.42 +16:53:37.0 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.1K Sep  6 05:58 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60  V8055  2026-08-30.22 10.89
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep  6 05:58 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep  6 05:58 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
01:51:02.630 +05:47:25.17  AT 2026ynj  2026-08-06.85 21.71
01:41:41.730 +01:06:49.26  AT 2026yni  2026-08-06.85 21.65
01:49:11.200 -00:33:20.53  AT 2026ynh  2026-08-06.84 21.38
01:07:41.150 -00:00:30.93  AT 2026yng  2026-08-06.84 21.99
01:00:19.600 +05:13:13.68  AT 2026ynf  2026-08-06.84 21.4
00:02:10.680 +04:29:05.91  AT 2026yne  2026-08-06.83 22.4
00:13:33.330 +04:19:21.34  AT 2026ynd  2026-08-06.77 22.15
23:51:06.360 +01:51:14.34  AT 2026ync  2026-08-06.76 22.21
23:15:09.720 +02:58:45.37  AT 2026ynb  2026-08-06.75 22.52
22:50:40.350 +05:31:47.83  AT 2026yna  2026-08-05.73 21.56
22:48:01.050 +02:29:57.95  AT 2026ymz  2026-08-05.73 21.98
22:56:40.110 +02:46:51.37  AT 2026ymy  2026-08-04.80 21.96
01:44:34.660 +05:27:13.55  AT 2026ymx  2026-08-01.88 21.27
01:29:50.630 +00:07:42.35  AT 2026ymw  2026-07-21.86 22.34
01:20:55.160 +01:31:29.58  AT 2026ymv  2026-07-20.88 22.17
23:25:01.600 +02:19:39.37  AT 2026ymu  2026-07-20.78 22.49
22:52:58.240 +03:42:25.38  AT 2026ymt  2026-08-05.73 21.81
23:42:43.162 +19:31:30.19  AT 2026yms  2026-08-09.94 19.57
21:20:13.290 -37:42:51.98  AT 2026ymr  2026-08-09.45 19.171
17:37:51.010 -21:58:53.20  AT 2026ymq  2026-08-09.59 14.86
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Sep  6 05:58 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Sun Sep  6 05:58:07 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 3 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 5s (0.08 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 31s (0.52 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 7s (0.12 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 48s (0.80 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 13 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 20s (0.33 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 13s (0.22 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 1s (0.02 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 2s (0.03 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 14s (0.23 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 50s (0.83 min)
FIELD_Tau-06-Q2b1x1: 114s (1.90 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 117s (1.95 min)
Finished: Sun Sep  6 06:00:04 CDT 2026