This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2994 2461289.7994 12.44 04:38:22.64 +25:10:36.4
174.29063 -14.34816 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -1 -0 1 12.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:38:22.64 +25:10:36.4: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:38:22.64 +25:10:36.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 06.2994* 04 38 22.64 +25 10 36.4 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461289.7994,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260906.2994 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2994 2461289.7994 12.57 05:14:51.56 +28:54:57.9
176.31378 -5.63413 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.63 Ausonia 0 -0 0 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:14:51.56 +28:54:57.9: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:14:51.56 +28:54:57.9: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461289.7994,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260906.2994 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2994 2461289.7994 13.61 04:26:00.40 +27:02:28.0
170.95265 -15.22597 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana -0 -1 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:26:00.40 +27:02:28.0: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:26:00.40 +27:02:28.0: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 06.2994* 04 26 00.40 +27 02 28.0 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461289.7994,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260906.2994 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2994 2461289.7994 14.14 04:50:29.93 +27:41:38.8
174.04758 -10.65474 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.359 Georgia -1 -0 1 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:50:29.93 +27:41:38.8: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:50:29.93 +27:41:38.8: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 06.2994* 04 50 29.93 +27 41 38.8 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461289.7994,14.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260906.2994 14.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2994 2461289.7994 14.32 04:49:45.21 +32:13:46.3
170.36673 -7.93379 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.852 Wladilena -0 -0 0 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:49:45.21 +32:13:46.3: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:49:45.21 +32:13:46.3: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461289.7994,14.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260906.2994 14.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.2994 2461289.7994 12.68 05:30:04.15 +25:01:48.8
181.45372 -5.01418 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 5.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" NSVS 6923161
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.300 R1 11.700 R1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:30:04.15 +25:01:48.8: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:30:04.15 +25:01:48.8: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 06.2994* 05 30 04.15 +25 01 48.8 12.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 6923161,2461289.7994,12.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 6923161 20260906.2994 12.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461289.79963661 06.09.2026 07:11:18.603 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15215
Objects passed selection criteria: 15137
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11072.5
Average stars matched: 10767.2 (97.2432 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 240804 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 6 02:13:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461289.79963661 06.09.2026 07:11:18.603 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 128
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 37 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 116962
Objects passed selection criteria: 116748
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 89994.8
Average stars matched: 86742 (96.3856 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 578492 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 6 02:15:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461289.79910344
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Image size: 942.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:02.157 +29:58:27.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:02.157 +29:58:27.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0205 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.194 +29:58:30.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:00.194 +29:58:30.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0195 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:02.157 +29:58:27.30
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:00.194 +29:58:30.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00713 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y0FLO8T0KR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zPnDdG2Htt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z9eczX6y0F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits &> /tmp/tmp.prOizETnm4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2864 deg
Loaded 8429 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6042 out of 6743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6743 out of 16349 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.y0FLO8T0KR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=0, passed=16295
Got 16295 stars (including 14768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zPnDdG2Htt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=0, passed=16349
Got 16349 stars (including 14839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5281)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Z9eczX6y0F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=261, bad_region=0, passed=5975
Got 5975 stars (including 5707 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5975 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013096 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010477 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4778 stars left (next iteration limit 5253)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4778 robust_rms=8.059 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.970 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4778 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.503 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4778 robust_rms=0.364 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.416 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4778 robust_rms_before=0.997 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.400 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.364 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.495 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.416
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Image size: 943.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:02.191 +29:58:26.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5975 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2786430.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.997 -> 0.364 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits N_match=4778 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=799 n_q2=1025 n_q3=967 n_q4=1987 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.prOizETnm4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=276, bad_region=0, passed=5970
Got 5970 stars (including 5687 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5970 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4813 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4771 stars left (next iteration limit 5245)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=7.782 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.861 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.461 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.525 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.433 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4771 robust_rms_before=0.997 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.397 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.472 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.433
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.472 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits N_match=4771 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=798 n_q2=1029 n_q3=893 n_q4=2051 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.114
ref2=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new1=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits sigma_overall=0.395 worst_q_ratio=1.131
new2=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits sigma_overall=0.410 worst_q_ratio=1.201
reference average sigma_overall=0.37 worst_q_ratio=1.1215
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (4801 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (4800 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175_astrometric_residuals.png (4778 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176_astrometric_residuals.png (4771 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21144_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 21144_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.27 +32:10:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.39 +34:08:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Image size: 943.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:02.191 +29:58:26.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:02.191 +29:58:26.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0208 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.194 +29:58:30.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:00.194 +29:58:30.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0195 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:02.191 +29:58:26.36
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:00.194 +29:58:30.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00729 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2pz67KOsWN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CqnYOO68t5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lh4j02Oh9e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits &> /tmp/tmp.60rkbUWTnE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.2955 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.2955 deg
Loaded 8479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4936 out of 6881 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6881 out of 129055 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 120 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.2pz67KOsWN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14027, bad_region=9, passed=128967
Got 128967 stars (including 114713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128967 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1871 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1152 n_q4=731 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CqnYOO68t5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=13827, bad_region=12, passed=129020
Got 129020 stars (including 114961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1874 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1148 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Lh4j02Oh9e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1974, bad_region=4, passed=52061
Got 52061 stars (including 50008 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52061 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013097 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010478 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4783 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5261)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=8.045 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.288 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=0.459 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.494 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=0.362 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.400 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4783 robust_rms_before=0.364 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.383 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.362 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.404 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.400
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.404 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits N_match=4783 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=833 n_q2=1011 n_q3=974 n_q4=1965 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.60rkbUWTnE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2031, bad_region=10, passed=52297
Got 52297 stars (including 50183 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52297 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=7.885 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.129 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.519 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.427 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4779 robust_rms_before=0.983 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.392 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.463 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.427
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.463 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.390 n_q1=840 n_q2=1017 n_q3=928 n_q4=1994 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-10-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-06_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_021200_TTUQ1b1x1_2726869_E93PSDbg/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:36:56.62 +28:25:18.3: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:52:18.18 +31:47:11.6: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:16.18 +32:38:13.2: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:34:49.13 +27:53:21.2: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:44:54.83 +26:35:01.5: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:36:56.62 +28:25:18.3: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:16.18 +32:38:13.2: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:34:49.13 +27:53:21.2: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:52:18.18 +31:47:11.6: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:16.18 +32:38:13.2: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4597 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:56.62 +28:25:18.3: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5789 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:49.13 +27:53:21.2: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4666 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:18.18 +31:47:11.6: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6008 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:44:54.83 +26:35:01.5: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:54.83 +26:35:01.5: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5894 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:55:45.18 +30:20:42.1: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:38:22.64 +25:10:36.4: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:55:45.18 +30:20:42.1: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:45.18 +30:20:42.1: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0909 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:38:22.64 +25:10:36.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:14:54.10 +31:02:57.5: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:14:51.56 +28:54:57.9: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:28:55.32 +32:26:11.9: 12.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:14:54.10 +31:02:57.5: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:14:51.56 +28:54:57.9: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:14:54.10 +31:02:57.5: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5841 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:28:55.32 +32:26:11.9: 12.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:01:54.49 +28:18:16.0: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:28:55.32 +32:26:11.9: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7041 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:27:41.05 +33:56:54.4: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:01:54.49 +28:18:16.0: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:54.49 +28:18:16.0: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0619 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:20:06.56 +32:46:12.2: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:27:41.05 +33:56:54.4: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:41.05 +33:56:54.4: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9234 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:26:00.40 +27:02:28.0: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:20:06.56 +32:46:12.2: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:06.56 +32:46:12.2: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1235 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:17:28.71 +34:14:26.0: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:26:00.40 +27:02:28.0: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:26:13.30 +29:58:20.8: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:17:28.71 +34:14:26.0: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:28.71 +34:14:26.0: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1676 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:26:13.30 +29:58:20.8: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:26:13.30 +29:58:20.8: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0566 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:50.01 +29:58:34.6: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:07:11.49 +29:14:19.6: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:01:47.90 +32:14:39.7: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:50.01 +29:58:34.6: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:50.01 +29:58:34.6: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4081 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:07:11.49 +29:14:19.6: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:11.49 +29:14:19.6: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3438 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:01:47.90 +32:14:39.7: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:47.90 +32:14:39.7: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3973 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:50:29.93 +27:41:38.8: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:49:45.21 +32:13:46.3: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:50:29.93 +27:41:38.8: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:49:45.21 +32:13:46.3: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:30:04.15 +25:01:48.8: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:30:04.15 +25:01:48.8: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:30:04.15 +25:01:48.8: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6767 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151329.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151398.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151582.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151857.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151868.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out96598.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151121_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151121_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151123_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151123_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:00.72 +29:52:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151125_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151125_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:33.15 +28:31:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151126_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151126_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151127_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151127_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:35.43 +31:49:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151128_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151128_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:31.25 +33:17:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151130_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151130_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151135_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151135_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:16.60 +27:54:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151136_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151136_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:56.89 +33:47:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151137_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151137_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151139_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151139_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:04.11 +30:27:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151140_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151140_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:59.52 +32:21:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151141_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151141_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151143_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151143_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:31.61 +31:29:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151145_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151145_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.05 +26:11:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151163_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151163_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151169_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151169_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151207_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151207_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151221_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151221_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151224_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151224_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151235_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151235_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151241_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151241_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151246_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151246_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151250_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151250_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:57.86 +33:05:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151258_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151258_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.48 +34:26:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151263_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151263_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151269_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151269_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.81 +34:09:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151273_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151273_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:18.10 +33:47:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151283_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151283_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151305_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151305_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:56.91 +33:06:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151306_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151306_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151322_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151322_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:29.75 +32:42:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151323_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151323_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.07 +34:07:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151329_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
Preparing report for the candidate 151329_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151333_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151333_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.38 +34:07:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151346_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151346_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151352_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151352_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:25.05 +30:30:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151363_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151363_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:46.57 +31:23:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151364_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151364_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.85 +26:54:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151368_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151368_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151370_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151370_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.61 +34:23:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151373_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151373_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:25.53 +34:49:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151378_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151378_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.09 +28:37:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151386_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151386_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.96 +28:31:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151392_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151392_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:18.69 +34:10:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151398_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
Preparing report for the candidate 151398_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151407_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151407_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151412_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151412_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.97 +26:25:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151434_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151434_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:01.83 +26:45:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151453_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151453_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.48 +33:11:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151460_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151460_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151468_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151468_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.78 +26:10:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.84 +29:47:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151500_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151500_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151504_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151504_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:55.59 +32:55:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151507_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151507_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.62 +32:33:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151508_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151508_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.57 +33:12:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151509_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151509_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151513_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151513_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.29 +31:44:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151518_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151518_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:10.21 +34:24:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151536_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151536_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.67 +29:45:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151542_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151542_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151546_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151546_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:46.97 +29:10:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151554_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151554_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:26.54 +34:06:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151558_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151558_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151572_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151572_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:45.60 +28:00:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151580_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151580_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151582_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
Preparing report for the candidate 151582_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151588_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151588_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.89 +33:11:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151589_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151589_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:45.75 +30:29:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151597_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151597_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:45.19 +31:09:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151598_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151598_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:35.83 +31:24:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151601_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151601_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151605_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151605_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151606_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151606_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:27.63 +34:00:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151615_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151615_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151626_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151626_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:18.43 +33:59:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151629_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151629_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:52.64 +32:19:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151633_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151633_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151637_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151637_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151644_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151644_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151646_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151646_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151658_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151658_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:47.83 +29:29:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151663_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151663_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:42.24 +29:07:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151668_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151668_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151672_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151672_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:27.01 +34:24:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151680_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151680_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151685_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151685_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151709_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151709_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151716_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151716_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.18 +31:04:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151717_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151717_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151730_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151730_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151744_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151744_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:31.81 +30:49:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151754_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151754_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151757_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151757_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151779_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151779_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.98 +30:48:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151783_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151783_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151804_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151804_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151818_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151818_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:38.22 +31:15:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151832_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151832_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151836_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151836_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151845_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151845_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151850_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 151850_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:59.70 +32:25:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151857_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
Preparing report for the candidate 151857_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151868_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
Preparing report for the candidate 151868_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.45 +31:18:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.26 +32:10:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:47.51 +26:45:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 141164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:26.04 +29:15:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:38.54 +28:39:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96598_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
Preparing report for the candidate 96598_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.48 +28:42:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.38 +26:08:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:08.24 +27:03:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:49.55 +34:37:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:50.27 +29:42:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.42 +34:08:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176
The candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-06_02-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks
