This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.0812 2461289.5812 13.27 17:38:17.53 -27:32:18.2
0.33624 2.10839 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 5.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSV 23055
Type:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
< 8.000 R < 18.000 R
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:38:17.53 -27:32:18.2: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:38:17.53 -27:32:18.2: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 23055,2461289.5812,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 23055 20260906.0812 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.0812 2461289.5812 12.30 17:08:59.76 -27:54:01.8
356.38796 7.27370 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" V0361 Oph
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.210 Ic Y 1.617 Ic 215.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:08:59.76 -27:54:01.8: 14.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:08:59.76 -27:54:01.8: 14.13 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.14
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0361 Oph,2461289.5812,12.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0361 Oph 20260906.0812 12.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.0812 2461289.5812 10.98 17:10:50.15 -24:21:25.7
359.53896 9.00486 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASAS J171050-2421.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
7.747 Ic Y 0.861 Ic 2452605.40000 160.800000000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:10:50.15 -24:21:25.7: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:10:50.15 -24:21:25.7: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J171050-2421.4,2461289.5812,10.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J171050-2421.4 20260906.0812 10.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 06.0812 2461289.5812 11.79 16:59:50.31 -24:21:21.6
358.04344 11.03077 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V2708 Oph
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.300 V < 14.300 V 2453630.00000 335.500000000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 16:59:50.31 -24:21:21.6: 12.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 16:59:50.31 -24:21:21.6: 12.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2708 Oph,2461289.5812,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2708 Oph 20260906.0812 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461170.88387507 10.05.2026 09:12:36.806 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
First image: 2461170.88387507 10.05.2026 09:12:36.806 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Last image: 2461289.58148875 06.09.2026 01:57:10.628 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8026
Objects passed selection criteria: 8011
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6739.25
Average stars matched: 6597.75 (97.9004 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235112 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 5 20:59:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461170.88387507 10.05.2026 09:12:36.806 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
First image: 2461170.88387507 10.05.2026 09:12:36.806 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Last image: 2461289.58148875 06.09.2026 01:57:10.628 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 155
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.00
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 33 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 83756
Objects passed selection criteria: 83662
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 72149.5
Average stars matched: 69276.8 (96.0183 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 512772 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 5 21:02:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461289.58094888
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:49.064 -25:59:50.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Image size: 936.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:48.710 -26:00:56.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:49.064 -25:59:50.55
Second-epoch image center 17:16:48.710 -26:00:56.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0183 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Image size: 936.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:46.330 -26:01:06.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:49.064 -25:59:50.55
Second-epoch image center 17:16:46.330 -26:01:06.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0235 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:16:48.710 -26:00:56.18
Second-epoch second image center 17:16:46.330 -26:01:06.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00937 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jtvK5RlOqe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nu39BGFOx5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s8Hb4kOtpC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q9vq0Aagyf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11194 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.1791 to 268.2906 deg, Dec -31.2584 to -20.5377 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.1791 to 268.2906 deg, Dec -31.2584 to -20.5377 deg
Loaded 11241 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7246 out of 7518 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7518 out of 11194 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.639600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.639600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11194 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.1791 to 268.2906 deg, Dec -31.2584 to -20.5377 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.1791 to 268.2906 deg, Dec -31.2584 to -20.5377 deg
Loaded 11241 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7246 out of 7518 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7518 out of 11194 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 11115 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.1792 to 268.2908 deg, Dec -31.2509 to -20.5366 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.1792 to 268.2908 deg, Dec -31.2509 to -20.5366 deg
Loaded 11230 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7223 out of 7504 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7504 out of 11115 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
2.4 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
14.3 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.jtvK5RlOqe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=730, bad_region=2540, passed=11194
Got 11194 stars (including 8033 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11194 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4814 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 4815 stars left (next iteration limit 5294)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits N_match=4815 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.519 n_q1=1029 n_q2=835 n_q3=1854 n_q4=1097 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.099
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nu39BGFOx5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=729, bad_region=2533, passed=11115
Got 11115 stars (including 7972 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11115 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 4812 stars left (next iteration limit 5296)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits N_match=4812 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.562 n_q1=1025 n_q2=840 n_q3=1852 n_q4=1095 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.024
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.s8Hb4kOtpC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=404, bad_region=1151, passed=6065
Got 6065 stars (including 4582 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6065 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4494 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4406 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4405 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4496 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4407 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4407 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Excluding outliers - 4407 stars left (next iteration limit 4845)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4407 robust_rms=7.675 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.723 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4407 robust_rms=0.642 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.689 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4407 robust_rms=0.613 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.640 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4407 robust_rms_before=0.913 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.754 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.613 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.785 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.640
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:48.683 -26:00:56.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6065 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2332000.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.913 -> 0.613 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits N_match=4407 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.634 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.646 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.642 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.659 n_q1=1011 n_q2=740 n_q3=1731 n_q4=925 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.039
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.q9vq0Aagyf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=453, bad_region=1174, passed=6196
Got 6196 stars (including 4651 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6196 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4557 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4474 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4472 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5356 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4562 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4472 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5356 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4472 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5356 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Excluding outliers - 4472 stars left (next iteration limit 4919)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4472 robust_rms=7.717 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.710 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4472 robust_rms=0.638 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.698 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4472 robust_rms=0.617 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.675 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4472 robust_rms_before=0.899 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.751 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.638 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.779 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.698
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Image size: 936.7'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:46.305 -26:01:07.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6196 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2331910.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.899 -> 0.638 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=4472 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.671 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.649 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.679 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.726 n_q1=994 n_q2=767 n_q3=1754 n_q4=957 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.081
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits sigma_overall=0.567 worst_q_ratio=1.099
ref2=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits sigma_overall=0.572 worst_q_ratio=1.024
new1=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits sigma_overall=0.634 worst_q_ratio=1.039
new2=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.671 worst_q_ratio=1.081
reference average sigma_overall=0.5695 worst_q_ratio=1.0615
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050_astrometric_residuals.png (4815 matched stars from wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051_astrometric_residuals.png (4812 matched stars from wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000_astrometric_residuals.png (4407 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (4472 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:10:50.14 -24:21:25.3: 11.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:10:50.14 -24:21:25.3: 11.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:50.14 -24:21:25.3: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8997 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20537_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 20537_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:00.78 -27:12:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20542_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 20542_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:27.51 -24:56:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20544_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 20544_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:33.80 -23:00:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20255_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 20255_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05397_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 05397_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:08.12 -27:15:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:49.064 -25:59:50.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:48.683 -26:00:56.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:49.064 -25:59:50.55
Second-epoch image center 17:16:48.683 -26:00:56.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0185 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Image size: 936.7'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:46.305 -26:01:07.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:49.064 -25:59:50.55
Second-epoch image center 17:16:46.305 -26:01:07.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0236 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:16:48.683 -26:00:56.83
Second-epoch second image center 17:16:46.305 -26:01:07.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00935 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ep9UnWdvJN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CpAgUY0YEc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dzkfPZ4UEz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.urEEBhCAgI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 112804 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.1051 to 268.3151 deg, Dec -31.2644 to -20.5377 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.1051 to 268.3151 deg, Dec -31.2644 to -20.5377 deg
Loaded 11298 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8148 out of 9622 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9622 out of 112804 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.416200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.416200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.00
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 112804 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.1051 to 268.3151 deg, Dec -31.2644 to -20.5377 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.1051 to 268.3151 deg, Dec -31.2644 to -20.5377 deg
Loaded 11298 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8148 out of 9622 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9622 out of 112804 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 114045 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0987 to 268.3112 deg, Dec -31.2511 to -20.5306 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0987 to 268.3112 deg, Dec -31.2511 to -20.5306 deg
Loaded 11284 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8125 out of 9624 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9624 out of 114045 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 105 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
2.3 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Ep9UnWdvJN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=9107, bad_region=20077, passed=112801
Got 112801 stars (including 85016 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 112801 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4813 stars left (next iteration limit 5296)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits N_match=4813 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=1052 n_q2=809 n_q3=1879 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.050
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CpAgUY0YEc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=9199, bad_region=20327, passed=114040
Got 114040 stars (including 85852 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 114040 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4821 stars left (next iteration limit 5304)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits N_match=4821 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.595 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.546 n_q1=1062 n_q2=821 n_q3=1875 n_q4=1063 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.036
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dzkfPZ4UEz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=3390, bad_region=8168, passed=58409
Got 58409 stars (including 47620 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58409 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=7.448 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.403 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=0.636 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.695 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=0.615 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.661 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4799 robust_rms_before=0.605 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.719 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.636 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.652 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.695
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.652 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.689 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.687 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.675 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.649 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.712 n_q1=1114 n_q2=763 n_q3=1961 n_q4=961 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.034
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.urEEBhCAgI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=3636, bad_region=8530, passed=62823
Got 62823 stars (including 51470 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62823 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013010 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010408 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 4809 stars left (next iteration limit 5292)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=7.359 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.140 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=0.624 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.683 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=0.603 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.676 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4809 robust_rms_before=0.625 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.700 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.624 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.690 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.683
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.690 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=4809 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.681 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.675 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.624 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.655 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.770 n_q1=1116 n_q2=773 n_q3=1964 n_q4=956 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-56-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_205742_TTUQ2b1x1_2321062_fBaa1cjr/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:40:14.29 -23:29:23.8: 12.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:47:46.59 -27:39:29.4: 12.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 16:59:18.76 -26:38:28.8: 12.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:46:40.98 -27:19:07.9: 13.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:39:07.05 -26:57:14.0: 12.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:42:32.67 -22:42:06.6: 12.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:00:57.35 -25:44:39.1: 12.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:36:10.39 -28:25:29.2: 12.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:40:14.29 -23:29:23.8: 12.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 16:59:18.76 -26:38:28.8: 12.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:46:40.98 -27:19:07.9: 13.58 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:47:46.59 -27:39:29.4: 12.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:39:07.05 -26:57:14.0: 12.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:42:32.67 -22:42:06.6: 12.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:00:57.35 -25:44:39.1: 12.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:40:14.29 -23:29:23.8: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7681 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:46:40.98 -27:19:07.9: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4011 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:59:18.76 -26:38:28.8: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5357 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:47:46.59 -27:39:29.4: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7898 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:39:07.05 -26:57:14.0: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8596 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:42:32.67 -22:42:06.6: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8292 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:57.35 -25:44:39.1: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7874 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:36:10.39 -28:25:29.2: 12.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:36:10.39 -28:25:29.2: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3251 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:42:15.25 -23:21:13.6: 11.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:46:24.57 -26:11:08.2: 11.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:20:14.77 -28:05:53.4: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:45:55.77 -26:58:53.5: 12.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:42:15.25 -23:21:13.6: 11.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:46:24.57 -26:11:08.2: 12.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:42:15.25 -23:21:13.6: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9862 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:20:14.77 -28:05:53.4: 11.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:46:24.57 -26:11:08.2: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0647 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:14.77 -28:05:53.4: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9244 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:45:55.77 -26:58:53.5: 12.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:45:55.77 -26:58:53.5: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5621 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:37:40.48 -28:26:13.6: 12.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:45:46.64 -27:12:36.5: 12.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:19:31.50 -29:16:49.9: 13.02 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:44:37.66 -22:57:40.7: 12.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:37:40.48 -28:26:13.6: 12.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:37:40.48 -28:26:13.6: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6987 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:45:46.64 -27:12:36.5: 12.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:45:46.64 -27:12:36.5: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8701 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:38:19.49 -24:56:04.4: 13.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:19:31.50 -29:16:49.9: 12.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:31.50 -29:16:49.9: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7692 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:44:37.66 -22:57:40.7: 12.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:37.66 -22:57:40.7: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8573 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:24:27.66 -24:46:51.1: 13.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:38:19.49 -24:56:04.4: 13.60 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:38:19.49 -24:56:04.4: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1246 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:27:16.55 -26:21:27.7: 13.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:00:56.63 -27:15:10.9: 12.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:24:27.66 -24:46:51.1: 13.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:24:27.66 -24:46:51.1: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0754 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:44:29.28 -27:37:46.7: 13.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:27:16.55 -26:21:27.7: 12.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:27:16.55 -26:21:27.7: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0562 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:19:19.25 -22:14:41.3: 13.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:00:56.63 -27:15:10.9: 12.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:56.63 -27:15:10.9: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9233 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:07:34.78 -28:43:43.3: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:44:29.28 -27:37:46.7: 13.99 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:29.28 -27:37:46.7: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3566 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:38:17.53 -27:32:18.2: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:19:19.25 -22:14:41.3: 13.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:19.25 -22:14:41.3: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1781 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:07:34.78 -28:43:43.3: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:41:15.01 -26:11:40.7: 13.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:41:28.15 -25:07:46.9: 14.43 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:38:17.53 -27:32:18.2: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:41:28.15 -25:07:46.9: 14.23 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:41:28.15 -25:07:46.9: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7140 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:41:15.01 -26:11:40.7: 13.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:41:15.01 -26:11:40.7: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6520 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:08:59.76 -27:54:01.8: 14.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 17:10:50.15 -24:21:25.7: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-12-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 16:59:50.31 -24:21:21.6: 12.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:08:59.76 -27:54:01.8: 14.13 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:08:59.76 -27:54:01.8: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=12.3015 delta=1.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 17:10:50.15 -24:21:25.7: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:10:50.15 -24:21:25.7: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.9762 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_04-13-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 16:59:50.31 -24:21:21.6: 12.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:59:50.31 -24:21:21.6: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.7954 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out133838.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108286.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133850.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32175.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33694.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133478_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133478_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133504_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133504_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:02.82 -23:42:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133508_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133508_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133513_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133513_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133516_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133516_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:04.48 -26:21:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133525_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133525_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133528_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133528_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133529_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133529_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133530_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133530_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133536_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133536_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:22.63 -29:55:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133540_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133540_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133544_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133544_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:04.70 -29:02:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133558_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133558_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:27.49 -24:56:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133569_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133569_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:22.42 -22:02:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133574_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133574_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:15.70 -22:01:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133577_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133577_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:08.98 -22:30:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133578_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133578_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:21.62 -28:56:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133579_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133579_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:37.96 -27:18:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133580_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133580_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:07.03 -25:44:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133581_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133581_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133584_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133584_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:50.00 -23:09:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133587_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133587_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133593_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133593_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133594_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133594_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:46.82 -29:52:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133600_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133600_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:39.56 -25:50:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133606_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133606_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:11.65 -27:52:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133620_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133620_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:04.50 -21:58:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133621_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133621_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:19.77 -29:05:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133623_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133623_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:28.15 -21:56:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133626_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133626_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:28.50 -27:46:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133630_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133630_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:38.86 -25:09:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133631_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133631_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133636_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133636_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:03.56 -22:25:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133640_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133640_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:57.98 -22:30:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133641_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133641_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:24.08 -23:22:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133650_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133650_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:12.09 -24:58:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133651_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133651_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:13.76 -28:58:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133658_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133658_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:35.73 -22:26:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133661_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133661_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:34.84 -22:03:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133666_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133666_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133669_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133669_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:10.30 -29:03:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133672_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133672_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:29.72 -30:14:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133674_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133674_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:43.85 -28:20:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133684_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133684_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:24.65 -29:06:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133685_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133685_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133689_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133689_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:24.65 -24:27:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133700_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133700_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133702_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133702_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133713_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133713_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:03.50 -29:13:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133714_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133714_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:03.02 -25:27:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133715_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133715_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:50.87 -26:29:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133723_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133723_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:11.36 -27:43:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133729_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133729_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:00.98 -23:49:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133747_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133747_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133749_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133749_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:01.93 -25:40:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133756_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133756_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:03.92 -28:32:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133773_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133773_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:41.23 -21:53:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133776_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133776_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:03.32 -25:15:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133779_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133779_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:36.01 -28:56:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133780_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133780_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:19.75 -25:58:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133784_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133784_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:05.57 -27:52:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133785_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133785_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:21.74 -29:33:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133791_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133791_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133794_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133794_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:39.09 -29:16:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133798_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133798_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:59.54 -28:25:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133799_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133799_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133804_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133804_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:09.56 -27:46:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133808_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133808_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133809_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133809_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:06.48 -27:23:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133812_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133812_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:20.23 -28:25:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133815_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133815_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:00.85 -29:54:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133816_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133816_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:43.47 -23:34:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133819_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133819_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:03.28 -25:56:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133820_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133820_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133823_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133823_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133824_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133824_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:30.90 -27:57:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133826_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133826_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:32.32 -22:55:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133837_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133837_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:19.59 -22:26:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133838_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133838_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:34.78 -28:43:43.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.19, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.17)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.840 6029939401312487424 256.89491329421 -28.72846117774 12.5435 10.6454 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.840#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133849_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133849_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:31.60 -24:39:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133850_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 133850_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133858_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133858_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:15.85 -25:53:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133871_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133871_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:20.94 -30:16:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133874_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133874_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:12.58 -25:22:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133876_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133876_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:53.95 -27:39:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133884_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133884_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:41.36 -22:19:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133885_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133885_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:36.70 -22:24:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133887_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133887_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133892_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133892_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:16.99 -22:24:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133897_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133897_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133898_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133898_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:38.28 -23:50:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133915_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133915_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:43.62 -24:33:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133917_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133917_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:12.13 -23:05:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108286_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 108286_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32175_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 32175_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54642_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 54642_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:08.63 -26:22:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22552_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 22552_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:23.45 -23:16:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33694_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 33694_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98416_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 98416_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:46.22 -29:03:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107086_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 107086_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:18.44 -28:03:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84285_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 84285_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:00.85 -27:12:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21287_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 21287_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:33.78 -23:00:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88623_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 88623_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:54.93 -30:11:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84079_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 84079_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:08.18 -27:15:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56724_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 56724_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_20-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks