This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.4516 2461288.9516 12.51 03:06:02.28 +02:34:04.4
175.80457 -46.02859 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.129 Antigone 0 0 1 12.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:06:02.28 +02:34:04.4: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:06:02.28 +02:34:04.4: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.4516* 03 06 02.28 +02 34 04.4 12.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.9516,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.4516 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.4516 2461288.9516 12.70 03:03:19.20 +04:10:40.8
173.49774 -45.35310 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.221 Eos -1 -0 1 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:03:19.20 +04:10:40.8: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:03:19.20 +04:10:40.8: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.4516* 03 03 19.20 +04 10 40.8 12.7 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.9516,12.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.4516 12.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.4516* 03 22 47.16 +08 37 08.3 13.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.9516,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.4516 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.4516 2461288.9516 13.64 03:11:54.11 +03:27:04.6
176.36671 -44.36528 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 2.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.464 Megaira -2 1 2 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:11:54.11 +03:27:04.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:11:54.11 +03:27:04.6: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.4516* 03 11 54.11 +03 27 04.6 13.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.9516,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.4516 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.4516 2461288.9516 14.32 03:50:02.97 +09:58:21.3
178.55177 -32.99636 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.8" and 1.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 03:50:02.97 +09:58:21.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:50:02.97 +09:58:21.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:50:02.97 +09:58:21.3: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.4516* 03 50 02.97 +09 58 21.3 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461288.9516,14.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260905.4516 14.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
First image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Last image: 2461288.95180936 05.09.2026 10:50:26.329 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6426
Objects passed selection criteria: 6419
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5766.5
Average stars matched: 5684.5 (98.578 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232784 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 5 05:52:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
First image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Last image: 2461288.95180936 05.09.2026 10:50:26.329 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 88
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 35858
Objects passed selection criteria: 35773
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30256.5
Average stars matched: 29685.5 (98.1128 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 259268 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 5 05:53:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461288.95130807
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:56.894 +05:59:42.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:25:56.894 +05:59:42.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0474 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:56.852 +05:59:28.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:25:56.852 +05:59:28.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0463 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:25:56.894 +05:59:42.77
Second-epoch second image center 03:25:56.852 +05:59:28.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00401 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E9B8hLoHs6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I9aUppK683
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jbJG3FJ7R3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zLi2yT80SK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2623 deg
Loaded 4344 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3518 out of 3704 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3704 out of 6894 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2623 deg
Loaded 4344 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3518 out of 3704 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3704 out of 6894 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 6511 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4391 to 59.4125 deg, Dec +0.6696 to +11.2487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4391 to 59.4125 deg, Dec 0.6696 to 11.2487 deg
Loaded 4348 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3541 out of 3691 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3691 out of 6511 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
2.1 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
3.6 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
3.6 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
15.2 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.E9B8hLoHs6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=524, bad_region=0, passed=6894
Got 6894 stars (including 6363 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6894 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.232 n_q1=1258 n_q2=1017 n_q3=1321 n_q4=1279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.316
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.I9aUppK683 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=474, bad_region=1, passed=6511
Got 6511 stars (including 6031 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6511 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.237 n_q1=1260 n_q2=1041 n_q3=1292 n_q4=1287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jbJG3FJ7R3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=260, bad_region=0, passed=4906
Got 4906 stars (including 4643 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4906 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4543 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4537 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4537 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4541 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4535 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4535 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4535 stars left (next iteration limit 4990)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4535 robust_rms=11.823 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.272 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4535 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.411 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4535 robust_rms=0.339 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.384 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4535 robust_rms_before=0.838 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.331 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.339 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.381 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.384
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.381 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits N_match=4535 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=1204 n_q2=1186 n_q3=962 n_q4=1183 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zLi2yT80SK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=267, bad_region=0, passed=4905
Got 4905 stars (including 4637 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4905 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4537 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4532 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4532 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4535 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4530 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4530 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4530 stars left (next iteration limit 4985)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4530 robust_rms=12.042 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.608 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4530 robust_rms=0.386 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.395 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4530 robust_rms=0.327 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.385 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4530 robust_rms_before=0.830 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.332 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.386 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.390 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.395
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.390 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits N_match=4530 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.282 n_q1=1192 n_q2=1179 n_q3=979 n_q4=1180 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits sigma_overall=0.283 worst_q_ratio=1.316
ref2=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits sigma_overall=0.290 worst_q_ratio=1.274
new1=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits sigma_overall=0.333 worst_q_ratio=1.144
new2=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.149
reference average sigma_overall=0.2865 worst_q_ratio=1.295
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390_astrometric_residuals.png (4535 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391_astrometric_residuals.png (4530 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:56.894 +05:59:42.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:25:56.894 +05:59:42.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0474 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:56.852 +05:59:28.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:25:56.852 +05:59:28.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0463 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:25:56.894 +05:59:42.77
Second-epoch second image center 03:25:56.852 +05:59:28.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00401 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q0rSqKfBkV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Cp836ceD0P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eF7oPSlWOU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A2tHL9VqJW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 40138 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2698 deg
Loaded 4347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3388 out of 3752 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3752 out of 40138 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.819500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.819500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 40138 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2698 deg
Loaded 4347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3388 out of 3752 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3752 out of 40138 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 36794 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4364 to 59.4140 deg, Dec +0.6695 to +11.2585 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4364 to 59.4140 deg, Dec 0.6695 to 11.2585 deg
Loaded 4354 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3421 out of 3757 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3757 out of 36794 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 77 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
2.0 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
3.2 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
3.2 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Q0rSqKfBkV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1702, bad_region=4, passed=40128
Got 40128 stars (including 38357 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40128 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1018 n_q3=1335 n_q4=1283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.315
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Cp836ceD0P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1580, bad_region=2, passed=36779
Got 36779 stars (including 35146 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36779 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1241 n_q2=1030 n_q3=1302 n_q4=1308 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.eF7oPSlWOU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=850, bad_region=20, passed=22637
Got 22637 stars (including 21740 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22637 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=11.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.218 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.411 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.414 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.342 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.387 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=0.843 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.338 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.342 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.385 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.387
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.385 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=1264 n_q2=1265 n_q3=1063 n_q4=1289 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.A2tHL9VqJW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=763, bad_region=23, passed=22479
Got 22479 stars (including 21674 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22479 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=11.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.112 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.404 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.331 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.394 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=0.832 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.337 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.393 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.404
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.393 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.282 n_q1=1261 n_q2=1267 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1289 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-49-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_055100_TTUQ1b1x1_2222528_99PAxS5Y/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:06:02.28 +02:34:04.4: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:03:19.20 +04:10:40.8: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:55:19.13 +08:09:12.0: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:06:02.28 +02:34:04.4: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:03:19.20 +04:10:40.8: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:55:19.13 +08:09:12.0: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:55:19.13 +08:09:12.0: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1096 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:15:31.60 +01:41:25.6: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:48:18.06 +08:47:52.0: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:11:54.11 +03:27:04.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:15:31.60 +01:41:25.6: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:15:31.60 +01:41:25.6: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6488 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:48:18.06 +08:47:52.0: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:18.06 +08:47:52.0: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7830 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:11:54.11 +03:27:04.6: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:50:02.97 +09:58:21.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:50:02.97 +09:58:21.3: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51601.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51612.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51927.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52155.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51442_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51442_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51454_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51454_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51491_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51491_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51499_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51499_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51508_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51508_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51530_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51530_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51548_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51548_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51552_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51552_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51582_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51582_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51601_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 51601_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51612_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 51612_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51616_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51616_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51622_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51622_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51647_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51647_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:07:19.96 +05:01:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51649_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51649_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51681_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51681_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51697_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51697_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51709_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51709_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:47.28 +09:11:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51722_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51722_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51724_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51724_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51742_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51742_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51746_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 51746_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51761_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51761_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51783_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51783_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51789_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51789_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51832_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51832_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51836_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51836_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51838_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51838_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51844_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51844_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51847_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51847_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51849_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51849_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51853_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51853_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51860_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51860_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51864_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51864_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51876_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51876_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51878_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51878_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51887_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51887_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51888_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51888_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51890_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51890_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51894_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51894_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51927_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 51927_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51941_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51941_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:48.94 +09:41:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51968_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51968_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51974_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51974_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51978_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51978_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51980_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51980_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51987_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 51987_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52001_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52001_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52018_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52018_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52022_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52022_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52044_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52044_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52048_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52048_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52052_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52052_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52053_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52053_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52069_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52069_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52082_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52082_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52083_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52083_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52085_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52085_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52086_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52086_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52091_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52091_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52102_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52102_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52104_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52104_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52111_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52111_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52114_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52114_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52119_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52119_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52123_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52123_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52136_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52136_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52138_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52138_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52139_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52139_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52145_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52145_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52149_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52149_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52154_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52154_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52155_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 52155_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52156_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52156_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52162_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52162_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52165_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 52165_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07856_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 07856_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_05-50-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks