This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.4032 2461288.9032 13.89 04:25:17.46 +26:58:37.4
170.89119 -15.38721 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.5" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana -1 -1 2 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:25:17.46 +26:58:37.4: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:25:17.46 +26:58:37.4: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.4032* 04 25 17.46 +26 58 37.4 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.9032,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.4032 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.4032 2461288.9032 13.70 03:32:41.01 +34:29:17.7
156.93251 -17.52837 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.762 Pulcova -0 0 0 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:32:41.01 +34:29:17.7: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:32:41.01 +34:29:17.7: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.4032* 03 32 41.01 +34 29 17.7 13.7 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.9032,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.4032 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461288.90360949 05.09.2026 09:41:01.860 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12686
Objects passed selection criteria: 12654
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10273.8
Average stars matched: 10022.8 (97.5569 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 238452 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 5 04:45:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461288.90360949 05.09.2026 09:41:01.860 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 80
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 90606
Objects passed selection criteria: 90409
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 71477
Average stars matched: 69100.8 (96.6755 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 480868 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 5 04:46:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461288.90279484
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:36.214 +29:59:05.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 03:59:36.214 +29:59:05.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0858 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:34.550 +29:59:46.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 03:59:34.550 +29:59:46.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0907 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:59:36.214 +29:59:05.45
Second-epoch second image center 03:59:34.550 +29:59:46.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01293 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yBxXgNlsND
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MGlmpwNgaU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YZn4KudhoX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WPRPEltQqn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3062 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3062 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5544 out of 6056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6056 out of 13390 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.967300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.967300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3062 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3062 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5544 out of 6056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6056 out of 13390 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5733 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3107 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5733 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3107 deg
Loaded 7269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5557 out of 6071 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6071 out of 13513 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.yBxXgNlsND (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13390
Got 13390 stars (including 12252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1524 n_q2=1103 n_q3=892 n_q4=1376 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MGlmpwNgaU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13513
Got 13513 stars (including 12361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1523 n_q2=1108 n_q3=895 n_q4=1373 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YZn4KudhoX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=386, bad_region=0, passed=7194
Got 7194 stars (including 6803 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7194 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=9.008 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.716 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.386 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.299 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.349 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=0.904 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.329 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.299 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.395 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.349
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:36.235 +29:59:04.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7194 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3859426.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.904 -> 0.299 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=1360 n_q2=860 n_q3=1164 n_q4=1489 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.230
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WPRPEltQqn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=379, bad_region=0, passed=7199
Got 7199 stars (including 6812 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7199 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5358)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=9.110 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.731 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.368 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.291 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.346 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=0.900 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.331 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.291 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.412 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.346
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:34.570 +29:59:45.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7199 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3859476.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.900 -> 0.291 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1353 n_q2=859 n_q3=1168 n_q4=1491 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.233
ref2=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.337 worst_q_ratio=1.288
new1=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.230
new2=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.220
reference average sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.2605
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (4899 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325_astrometric_residuals.png (4871 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:43:52.34 +25:16:25.2: 10.98 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:43:52.34 +25:16:25.2: 10.96 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.97 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:52.34 +25:16:25.2: ref_mag=10.97 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2296 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20878_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 20878_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20959_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 20959_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:11.14 +31:27:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20975_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 20975_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:56.04 +30:22:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20979_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 20979_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:15.18 +33:48:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01673_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 01673_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:38.01 +34:15:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03432_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 03432_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:44.73 +33:15:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:36.235 +29:59:04.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 03:59:36.235 +29:59:04.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0858 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:34.570 +29:59:45.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 03:59:34.570 +29:59:45.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0906 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:59:36.235 +29:59:04.51
Second-epoch second image center 03:59:34.570 +29:59:45.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01294 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CFVxRKKOQ2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5ADKoDdqp2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PmH13ygWga
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Uo61HyrAub
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3061 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3061 deg
Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4826 out of 6103 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6103 out of 99190 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.833900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.833900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3061 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3061 deg
Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4826 out of 6103 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6103 out of 99190 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 98825 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5581 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3528 to +35.3112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5581 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3528 to 35.3112 deg
Loaded 7286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4805 out of 6109 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6109 out of 98825 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 74 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
1.9 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.CFVxRKKOQ2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=7855, bad_region=9, passed=99158
Got 99158 stars (including 91129 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99158 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=1459 n_q2=1120 n_q3=933 n_q4=1390 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5ADKoDdqp2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=7957, bad_region=10, passed=98800
Got 98800 stars (including 90683 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=1460 n_q2=1117 n_q3=937 n_q4=1390 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.PmH13ygWga (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1935, bad_region=8, passed=44918
Got 44918 stars (including 42913 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44918 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=9.279 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.682 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.368 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.400 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.299 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.349 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4890 robust_rms_before=0.298 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.323 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.299 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.353 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.349
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.353 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1353 n_q2=855 n_q3=1178 n_q4=1504 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Uo61HyrAub (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1867, bad_region=12, passed=44758
Got 44758 stars (including 42820 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44758 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=9.192 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.574 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.355 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.374 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.291 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.335 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4892 robust_rms_before=0.292 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.332 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.291 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.338 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.335
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.338 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=1354 n_q2=850 n_q3=1181 n_q4=1507 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.222
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-39-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_044310_TTUQ1b1x1_3776624_HO7UI8I6/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:32:17.81 +33:35:13.8: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:40:42.22 +34:02:45.5: 13.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:30:20.43 +28:44:34.4: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:04:36.19 +33:59:30.9: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:42:42.36 +26:53:57.1: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:45:00.60 +30:39:55.4: 12.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:43:52.34 +25:16:25.2: 11.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:26:44.43 +35:03:24.1: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:37:35.87 +28:26:36.6: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:42:42.36 +26:53:57.1: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:04:36.19 +33:59:30.9: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:45:00.60 +30:39:55.4: 12.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:30:20.43 +28:44:34.4: 14.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:43:52.34 +25:16:25.2: 11.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:32:17.81 +33:35:13.8: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:40:42.22 +34:02:45.5: 13.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:42.36 +26:53:57.1: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6293 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:20.43 +28:44:34.4: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0769 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:42.22 +34:02:45.5: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2130 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:52.34 +25:16:25.2: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3957 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:00.60 +30:39:55.4: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1135 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:36.19 +33:59:30.9: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5925 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:32:17.81 +33:35:13.8: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4195 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:19:29.36 +30:51:26.5: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:37:35.87 +28:26:36.6: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:26:44.43 +35:03:24.1: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:35.87 +28:26:36.6: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4558 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:44.43 +35:03:24.1: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6482 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:19:29.36 +30:51:26.5: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:29.36 +30:51:26.5: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6413 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:30:55.09 +28:57:41.3: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:01:55.86 +31:58:49.4: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:55:53.02 +32:10:14.6: 13.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:44:35.54 +27:52:30.3: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:44:23.99 +32:10:59.2: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:28:41.09 +30:22:48.1: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:30:55.09 +28:57:41.3: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:55.09 +28:57:41.3: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1465 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:01:55.86 +31:58:49.4: 12.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:55.86 +31:58:49.4: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0159 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:56:24.89 +35:07:02.4: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:50:54.58 +29:40:02.9: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:55:53.02 +32:10:14.6: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:44:35.54 +27:52:30.3: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:53.02 +32:10:14.6: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1120 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:35.54 +27:52:30.3: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1799 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:44:23.99 +32:10:59.2: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:23.99 +32:10:59.2: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2704 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:28:41.09 +30:22:48.1: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:41.09 +30:22:48.1: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3361 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:07:46.78 +33:39:11.2: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:07:45.97 +33:41:32.4: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:56:24.89 +35:07:02.4: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:50:54.58 +29:40:02.9: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:24.89 +35:07:02.4: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4699 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:54.58 +29:40:02.9: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4761 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:04:23.09 +32:58:03.1: 13.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:07:46.78 +33:39:11.2: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:07:45.97 +33:41:32.4: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:46.78 +33:39:11.2: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4985 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:45.97 +33:41:32.4: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4835 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:46:03.18 +28:51:33.4: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:21:11.46 +30:56:19.5: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:31:14.92 +28:43:31.6: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:04:23.09 +32:58:03.1: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:23.09 +32:58:03.1: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4863 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:25:16.02 +29:47:49.2: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:46:03.18 +28:51:33.4: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:03.18 +28:51:33.4: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5992 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:15:16.82 +29:54:12.6: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:21:11.46 +30:56:19.5: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:11.46 +30:56:19.5: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5137 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:31:14.92 +28:43:31.6: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:14.92 +28:43:31.6: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6293 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:21:46.55 +30:12:40.3: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:48:55.72 +28:04:46.8: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:13:21.32 +33:28:52.1: 13.81 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:11:38.85 +29:48:36.4: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:25:16.02 +29:47:49.2: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:16.02 +29:47:49.2: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4976 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:15:16.82 +29:54:12.6: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:09:46.97 +32:48:54.0: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:16.82 +29:54:12.6: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6544 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:21:46.55 +30:12:40.3: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:48:55.72 +28:04:46.8: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:46.55 +30:12:40.3: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6606 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:55.72 +28:04:46.8: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7664 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:11:38.85 +29:48:36.4: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:13:21.32 +33:28:52.1: 13.87 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:38.85 +29:48:36.4: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6174 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:13:21.32 +33:28:52.1: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7305 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:17:41.50 +31:26:06.2: 13.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:45:19.58 +26:53:24.9: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:09:46.97 +32:48:54.0: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:46.97 +32:48:54.0: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7859 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:37:05.02 +29:26:30.4: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:59:36.58 +31:21:51.9: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:17:41.50 +31:26:06.2: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:41.50 +31:26:06.2: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7699 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:45:19.58 +26:53:24.9: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:19.58 +26:53:24.9: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7155 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:37:05.02 +29:26:30.4: 14.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:48:24.91 +29:10:46.2: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:05.02 +29:26:30.4: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0179 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:25:17.46 +26:58:37.4: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:02:30.85 +31:30:23.4: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:53:29.36 +28:09:12.2: 14.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:59:36.58 +31:21:51.9: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:45:10.69 +29:43:46.1: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:36.58 +31:21:51.9: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8670 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:48:24.91 +29:10:46.2: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:25:17.46 +26:58:37.4: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:24.91 +29:10:46.2: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9304 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:02:30.85 +31:30:23.4: 13.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:30.85 +31:30:23.4: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9386 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:53:29.36 +28:09:12.2: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:29.36 +28:09:12.2: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3872 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:45:10.69 +29:43:46.1: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:10.69 +29:43:46.1: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3658 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:32:41.01 +34:29:17.7: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:32:41.01 +34:29:17.7: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111504.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out118341.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117530_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117530_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117533_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117533_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117548_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117548_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117549_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117549_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:49.04 +29:06:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117552_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117552_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117556_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117556_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117559_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117559_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117560_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117560_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:35.09 +34:51:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117561_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117561_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117678_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117678_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:49.08 +33:34:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117731_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117731_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117732_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117732_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117748_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117748_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:26.83 +35:06:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117782_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117782_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117815_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117815_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:31.64 +33:49:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117817_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117817_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:33.19 +34:09:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117831_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117831_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117853_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117853_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:36.04 +34:06:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117866_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117866_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117873_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117873_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:24.87 +32:27:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117875_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117875_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:35.63 +34:07:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117879_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117879_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117880_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117880_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117888_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117888_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:05.97 +32:29:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117901_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117901_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117918_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117918_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:45.56 +34:21:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117930_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117930_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:23.27 +33:51:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117935_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117935_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117956_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117956_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117967_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117967_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:29.77 +33:27:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117974_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117974_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117977_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117977_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:06.73 +33:36:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117996_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 117996_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118002_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118002_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118015_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118015_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118018_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118018_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:56.97 +34:56:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118030_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118030_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:11.39 +25:53:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118032_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118032_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118046_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118046_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:03:16.99 +25:20:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118050_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118050_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118063_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118063_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118070_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118070_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:48.27 +27:33:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118072_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118072_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118074_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118074_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:17.91 +33:49:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118096_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118096_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118127_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118127_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118131_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118131_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118148_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118148_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118155_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118155_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118161_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118161_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118174_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118174_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118206_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118206_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118213_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118213_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118255_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118255_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118280_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118280_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:06.14 +32:33:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118319_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118319_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118320_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118320_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118333_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118333_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118341_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 118341_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118458_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118458_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:27:32.02 +34:49:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118463_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118463_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118482_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 118482_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72300_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 72300_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:34.34 +26:16:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111504_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 111504_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110522_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 110522_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:16.21 +33:02:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52535_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 52535_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:56.04 +30:22:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96483_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 96483_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:17.01 +28:10:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81784_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 81784_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:01.11 +28:53:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84145_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 84145_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:01.78 +27:15:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:15.25 +33:48:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96865_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 96865_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:17.14 +28:04:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:38.02 +34:15:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23744_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 23744_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:44.72 +33:15:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54567_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 54567_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_04-41-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks