Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 05.3256  2461288.8256  11.28  23:41:04.35 -18:12:24.4
 58.08746 -71.50770 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
23 Thalia                  -0     -0       0  11.5     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:41:04.35 -18:12:24.4:  14.78 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:41:04.35 -18:12:24.4:  14.82 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits -crosshair 2067.58765 3038.88281 image    wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -crosshair 2064.05225 3040.95239 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 05.32562 23 41 04.35 -18 12 24.4          11.3 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 05.32538 23 41 04.36 -18 12 24.3          11.2 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 09 05.32585 23 41 04.35 -18 12 24.6          11.3 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 09 05.3256*  23 41 04.35 -18 12 24.4  11.3 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.8256,11.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.3256 11.28CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 05.3256  2461288.8256  12.28  23:48:58.48 -18:17:43.4
 61.22452 -73.12693 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 4.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
259 Aletheia                 0      0       1  12.4     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:48:58.48 -18:17:43.4:  14.83 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:48:58.48 -18:17:43.4:  14.85 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits -crosshair 3208.39795 3005.81689 image    wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -crosshair 3204.81470 3007.91162 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 05.32562 23 48 58.48 -18 17 43.4          12.3 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 05.32538 23 48 58.48 -18 17 43.4          12.2 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 09 05.32585 23 48 58.48 -18 17 43.5          12.3 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 09 05.3256*  23 48 58.48 -18 17 43.4  12.3 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.8256,12.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.3256 12.28CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
First image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Last  image: 2461288.82585402 05.09.2026 07:49:03.787   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  2203
Objects passed selection criteria:  2202
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.7    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.7    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 2119
Average stars matched: 1997.75 (94.278 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   229488 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Sep  2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sat Sep  5 03:24:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
First image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Last  image: 2461288.82585402 05.09.2026 07:49:03.787   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 99
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.02
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  13946
Objects passed selection criteria:  13911
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.7    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.7    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 13345
Average stars matched: 12527.5 (93.8741 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   241212 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Sep  2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sat Sep  5 03:25:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-09-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-09-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 470872 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 470872 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits_preview.png'

Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits


renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits_preview.png'

Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2300.5383
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.8181
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1992.4800
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 549.6448
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1990.1060
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 549.0669
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 0.866093
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     24.6399993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 24.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-05T02:48:22.9096614' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-05T07:48:22.9096614' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61288.3252651505 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-05T07:48:32.8121925' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61288.3253797684 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.995873409737 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -17.9998633183127 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =                 38.4 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     179.162222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.60746783270836 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20471 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20471 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     24.6399993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     24.6399993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 16.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 63.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                900.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 24.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 47.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits :)

Spent 0.524212 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     24.6599998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 24.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-05T02:49:03.7875102' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-05T07:49:03.7875102' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61288.3257382754 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-05T07:49:13.6926719' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61288.3258529166 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.995873362871 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -17.9998633242599 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     38.4019444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     179.375277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.60739934111234 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20471 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20471 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     24.6599998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     24.6599998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 16.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 63.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                900.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 24.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 47.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits :)

Spent 0.510532 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits



fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461288.82538089
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.090 -17:59:44.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.090 -17:59:44.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0071 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.565 -17:59:57.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.565 -17:59:57.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0035 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  23:59:59.090 -17:59:44.15
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.565 -17:59:57.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00691 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yEeAbLLiqQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wpLQwjq6kn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J4fBV7CHfr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rNLkxwaxTq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.377200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.377200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.09

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.09

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=6.1)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg
Loaded 4123 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1992 out of 2014 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2014 out of 2454 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 2.2 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.1 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 14.1 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 14.2 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
 14.2 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.2 (SNR )  11.1 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.yEeAbLLiqQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=208, bad_region=499, passed=2460
Got 2460 stars (including 1784 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5854 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5854
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1726 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1723 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5853 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5853
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1726 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 1723 stars left (next iteration limit 1895)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=1723 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=568 n_q2=322 n_q3=534 n_q4=299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.041
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wpLQwjq6kn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=201, bad_region=492, passed=2454
Got 2454 stars (including 1791 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5961 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5961
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5952 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5952
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 1729 stars left (next iteration limit 1901)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=1729 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=569 n_q2=319 n_q3=549 n_q4=292 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.054
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.J4fBV7CHfr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=232, bad_region=600, passed=2901
Got 2901 stars (including 2109 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2901 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5953 through 0 to 8.4407, gap 8.4407 to 351.5953
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2045 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2039 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2039 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5950 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5950
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2045 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2039 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2039 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 2039 stars left (next iteration limit 2242)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2039 robust_rms=6.378 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.154 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2039 robust_rms=0.584 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.729 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2039 robust_rms=0.369 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.398 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2039 robust_rms_before=1.015 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.350 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.369 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.387 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.398
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.387 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits N_match=2039 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.379 n_q1=665 n_q2=363 n_q3=655 n_q4=356 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.rNLkxwaxTq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=232, bad_region=595, passed=2915
Got 2915 stars (including 2128 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2915 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5952 through 0 to 8.4407, gap 8.4407 to 351.5952
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2067 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2062 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2062 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5950 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5950
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2067 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2062 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2062 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 2062 stars left (next iteration limit 2268)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2062 robust_rms=6.356 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.640 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2062 robust_rms=0.576 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.736 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2062 robust_rms=0.379 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.424 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2062 robust_rms_before=0.997 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.361 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.379 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.389 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.424
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.389 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits N_match=2062 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=663 n_q2=369 n_q3=675 n_q4=355 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.041
ref2=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.054
new1=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits sigma_overall=0.372 worst_q_ratio=1.146
new2=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.205
reference average sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.0475
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472_astrometric_residuals.png (1723 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473_astrometric_residuals.png (1729 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252_astrometric_residuals.png (2039 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253_astrometric_residuals.png (2062 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:05:56.36 -20:39:14.9:  10.82 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:55:48.61 -17:47:25.7:  10.82 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:05:56.36 -20:39:14.9:  10.76 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:55:48.61 -17:47:25.7:  10.86 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  10.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  10.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:56.36 -20:39:14.9: ref_mag=10.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8985 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:48.61 -17:47:25.7: ref_mag=10.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9404 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20090_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20090_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    10.94    23:55:48.63 -17:47:25.6   4189 3319   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    10.94    23:55:48.59 -17:47:25.8   4185 3321   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20091_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20091_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    10.90    00:05:56.35 -20:39:14.7   5628 1582   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    10.90    00:05:56.37 -20:39:15.0   5625 1584   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20094_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20094_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    10.98    00:02:07.28 -14:40:37.6   5103 5203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

**** FOUND  00:02:07.30 -14:40:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.090 -17:59:44.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.090 -17:59:44.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0071 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.565 -17:59:57.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.565 -17:59:57.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0035 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  23:59:59.090 -17:59:44.15
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.565 -17:59:57.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00691 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8AGnmjwgxa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7kPLKhEHXR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZKpwgOHv8U
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gnf0bpUhZO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.243850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.243850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.02
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.22

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.22

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=4.8)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 15163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg
Loaded 4148 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3365 out of 3470 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3470 out of 15163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 38 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 2.1 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.2 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 14.2 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 14.4 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
 14.4 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.4 (SNR )  13.6 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8AGnmjwgxa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=477, bad_region=2343, passed=14965
Got 14965 stars (including 12255 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14965 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4424, gap 8.4424 to 351.5847
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5844 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5844
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5335)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=1541 n_q2=825 n_q3=1604 n_q4=881 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7kPLKhEHXR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=621, bad_region=2493, passed=15162
Got 15162 stars (including 12248 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15162 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5857 through 0 to 8.4400, gap 8.4400 to 351.5857
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5846 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5846
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 4843 stars left (next iteration limit 5327)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=4843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=1540 n_q2=830 n_q3=1606 n_q4=867 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZKpwgOHv8U (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=559, bad_region=3500, passed=17694
Got 17694 stars (including 13752 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17694 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5846 through 0 to 8.4407, gap 8.4407 to 351.5846
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5843 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5843
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Excluding outliers - 4846 stars left (next iteration limit 5329)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4846 robust_rms=6.572 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.634 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4846 robust_rms=0.631 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.804 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4846 robust_rms=0.440 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.526 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4846 robust_rms_before=1.022 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.422 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.440 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.500 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.526
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.500 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits N_match=4846 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=1573 n_q2=926 n_q3=1469 n_q4=878 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gnf0bpUhZO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=565, bad_region=3490, passed=17748
Got 17748 stars (including 13808 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5846 through 0 to 8.4407, gap 8.4407 to 351.5846
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5842 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5842
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Excluding outliers - 4841 stars left (next iteration limit 5324)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=6.471 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.892 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=0.616 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.812 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=0.448 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.525 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4841 robust_rms_before=0.982 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.427 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.448 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.484 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.525
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.484 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits N_match=4841 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.417 n_q1=1578 n_q2=915 n_q3=1466 n_q4=882 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:41:04.35 -18:12:24.4:  14.78 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:14:56.83 -20:18:35.8:  13.28 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:31:56.88 -17:37:53.5:  12.70 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:48:58.48 -18:17:43.4:  14.83 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:17:09.44 -21:53:47.4:  13.97 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:48:54.33 -22:05:47.8:  14.24 +/- 0.24  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:04:33.84 -20:54:14.9:  13.36 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:38:46.68 -22:11:45.2:  13.96 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:32:28.25 -20:49:27.2:  13.62 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:13:19.51 -21:18:39.3:  13.89 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:41:04.35 -18:12:24.4:  14.82 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:14:56.83 -20:18:35.8:  13.24 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:31:56.88 -17:37:53.5:  12.74 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.26 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:56.83 -20:18:35.8: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5068 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:56.88 -17:37:53.5: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8609 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:48:58.48 -18:17:43.4:  14.85 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:04:33.84 -20:54:14.9:  13.50 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:13:19.51 -21:18:39.3:  13.90 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:17:09.44 -21:53:47.4:  13.81 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:48:54.33 -22:05:47.8:  14.04 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:32:28.25 -20:49:27.2:  13.81 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:38:46.68 -22:11:45.2:  13.88 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.42 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.13 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:19.51 -21:18:39.3: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6897 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:04:33.84 -20:54:14.9: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.5803 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.70 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:54.33 -22:05:47.8: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7193 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:09.44 -21:53:47.4: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7244 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.91 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:28.25 -20:49:27.2: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5293 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:46.68 -22:11:45.2: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6925 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:13:41.11 -18:24:03.2:  13.77 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:30:52.91 -21:49:46.3:  13.80 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:32:45.35 -21:58:06.6:  14.03 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:32:52.92 -21:55:50.6:  13.73 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:35:15.03 -18:45:09.5:  14.22 +/- 0.26  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:30:41.75 -20:54:31.2:  14.04 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:13:41.11 -18:24:03.2:  13.91 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:41.11 -18:24:03.2: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7462 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:38:36.02 -13:44:14.6:  13.69 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:31:57.49 -14:50:15.1:  13.94 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:30:52.91 -21:49:46.3:  13.62 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.69 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:52.91 -21:49:46.3: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5878 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:32:45.35 -21:58:06.6:  13.83 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:32:52.92 -21:55:50.6:  13.84 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:35:15.03 -18:45:09.5:  14.07 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.78 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.92 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.13 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:45.35 -21:58:06.6: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7617 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:52.92 -21:55:50.6: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7104 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:15.03 -18:45:09.5: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.7793 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:30:41.75 -20:54:31.2:  13.76 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.87 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:41.75 -20:54:31.2: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7044 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:38:36.02 -13:44:14.6:  13.69 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:31:57.49 -14:50:15.1:  14.12 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:36.02 -13:44:14.6: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6256 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.02 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:57.49 -14:50:15.1: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6498 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:32:01.39 -16:17:32.4:  14.09 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:39:31.04 -14:04:31.4:  13.86 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:32:01.39 -16:17:32.4:  13.93 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.00 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:01.39 -16:17:32.4: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6481 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:39:31.04 -14:04:31.4:  13.84 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:31.04 -14:04:31.4: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7774 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20957.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20966.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20942_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20942_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    13.57    00:14:56.86 -20:18:35.6   6911 1767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.46    00:14:56.80 -20:18:36.1   6907 1769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20947_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20947_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    12.76    23:31:56.92 -17:37:53.3   0728 3350   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.03    23:31:56.84 -17:37:53.8   0725 3352   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20950_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20950_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    10.47    23:53:38.93 -17:55:49.0   3875 3235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20951_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20951_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    10.46    23:33:25.43 -19:03:30.5   0970 2491   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20953_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20953_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    10.99    00:16:27.93 -20:40:05.4   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20957_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 20957_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20959_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20959_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    11.32    23:49:50.30 -18:26:18.3   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20961_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20961_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    11.67    00:15:17.21 -21:36:18.4   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20962_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20962_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    11.63    23:32:49.68 -21:52:04.6   0940 0773   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20965_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20965_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    12.05    23:31:00.87 -19:04:52.3   0620 2464   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20966_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 20966_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20967_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20967_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    11.97    23:34:35.71 -16:38:47.0   1093 3964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20969_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20969_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    12.22    23:35:32.63 -15:00:39.8   1201 4964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20970_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20970_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.16    23:31:27.22 -20:20:16.4   0711 1700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20974_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20974_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.25    00:18:06.68 -17:50:17.8   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20980_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20980_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.46    00:11:58.01 -19:51:28.1   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20988_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20988_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.31    23:46:18.01 -14:01:54.2   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20991_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20991_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    13.56    00:04:33.88 -20:54:15.6   5432 1433   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.60    00:04:33.79 -20:54:14.2   5429 1435   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20994_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20994_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    13.67    00:17:09.42 -21:53:47.3   7203 0793   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.80    00:17:09.46 -21:53:47.5   7200 0796   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21002_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 21002_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    13.50    23:32:28.27 -20:49:27.1   0871 1407   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.56    23:32:28.23 -20:49:27.2   0868 1409   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21004_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 21004_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    13.64    23:38:46.70 -22:11:44.9   1797 0603   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.83    23:38:46.66 -22:11:45.4   1793 0606   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21014_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 21014_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    13.70    00:13:19.48 -21:18:39.1   6668 1165   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.68    00:13:19.55 -21:18:39.5   6665 1167   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21016_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 21016_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    13.67    23:48:54.33 -22:05:48.3   3226 0701   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.80    23:48:54.33 -22:05:47.4   3223 0703   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21017_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 21017_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.59    23:41:16.87 -16:07:31.3   2065 4304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21019_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 21019_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    13.73    00:13:41.09 -18:24:03.4   6754 2927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.77    00:13:41.13 -18:24:03.0   6751 2930   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21020_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 21020_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    13.59    23:30:52.93 -21:49:47.1   0664 0782   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.59    23:30:52.88 -21:49:45.4   0660 0784   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21031_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 21031_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    13.62    23:32:52.97 -21:55:50.5   0952 0733   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.85    23:32:52.87 -21:55:50.8   0949 0735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21038_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 21038_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    13.60    23:30:41.76 -20:54:31.4   0617 1344   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.87    23:30:41.75 -20:54:31.0   0614 1347   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21050_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 21050_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    13.74    23:32:45.29 -21:58:08.2   0935 0709   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.80    23:32:45.41 -21:58:05.0   0932 0711   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21057_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 21057_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.38    00:14:41.07 -14:21:47.4   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21071_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 21071_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.36    23:39:32.91 -14:06:59.5   1779 5522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21095_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 21095_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    13.68    23:35:15.04 -18:45:11.4   1233 2684   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.94    23:35:15.02 -18:45:07.6   1229 2686   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21105_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 21105_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    13.57    23:31:57.40 -14:50:15.0   0668 5055   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.77    23:31:57.58 -14:50:15.2   0664 5057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21159_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 21159_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    13.64    23:38:36.04 -13:44:14.1   1636 5749   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.61    23:38:36.00 -13:44:15.1   1632 5751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21164_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 21164_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    13.69    23:32:01.30 -16:17:33.5   0710 4166   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.61    23:32:01.48 -16:17:31.4   0707 4169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21193_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 21193_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 05.32538    2461288.82538    13.72    23:39:31.09 -14:04:33.4   1778 5545   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-48-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.87    23:39:30.99 -14:04:29.4   1774 5547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21197_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 21197_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    13.66    23:39:37.58 -13:42:54.2   1784 5768   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12864_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 12864_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 05.32585    2461288.82585    11.37    00:02:07.27 -14:40:37.7   5103 5203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_032230_TTUQ2b1x1_2158832_ZEB0SpK9/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-09-05_02-49-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

**** FOUND  00:02:07.29 -14:40:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:41:04.35 -18:12:24.4
23:48:58.48 -18:17:43.4
########### Completed Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
23:41:04.35 -18:12:24.4
23:48:58.48 -18:17:43.4
###################################################################################
23:41:04.35 -18:12:24.4  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
23:48:58.48 -18:17:43.4  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461288.82538089 -observatory V36
11:26:17.16 +05:00:22.7 Mercury (-1.0mag)
13:31:00.18 -13:45:33.8 Venus (-4.7mag)
07:08:38.96 +23:06:06.7 Mars (1.2mag)
09:07:25.20 +17:04:24.8 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:52:10.71 +02:41:48.5 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:13:39.40 +21:01:54.6 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:13:55.88 -00:01:58.7 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:25:43.90 -23:39:09.2 Pluto (14.5mag)
05:44:04.97 +27:37:52.0 Moon (-10.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep  5 03:24 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461288.82538089:
09:07:31.94 +17:03:52.3 Io (6.2mag)
09:07:28.36 +17:04:09.9 Europa (6.3mag)
09:07:38.53 +17:03:21.1 Ganymede (5.7mag)
09:07:00.56 +17:06:24.3 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:05:07.73 +17:20:02.5 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:07:29.27 +17:04:06.5 Thebe (16.6mag)
09:04:46.02 +17:14:08.3 Elara (17.7mag)
09:11:21.46 +16:32:35.8 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
09:08:38.79 +17:21:39.2 Carme (19.0mag)
00:52:16.32 +02:42:02.7 Titan (8.3mag)
00:52:13.86 +02:41:45.8 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:52:30.90 +02:44:27.1 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:52:19.27 +02:41:05.6 Hyperion (14.3mag)
00:50:59.56 +02:31:44.0 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep  5 03:24 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461288.82538089:
21:48:43.22 -01:01:45.7 JWST
18:51:15.89 +10:15:28.8 Chandra
11:07:00.45 -59:39:44.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep  5 03:24 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461288.82538089 -observatory V36
03:39:12.23 +19:14:46.8 17.4mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:02:15.56 -34:14:50.0 14.3mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:17:57.78 -70:11:37.4 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:15:27.28 +33:38:58.3 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:48:27.13 +45:10:40.9 15.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
04:48:27.13 +45:10:40.9 15.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:15:04.16 +28:54:24.2 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:08:40.16 +26:00:57.9 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:47:40.70 +27:17:52.9 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:47:24.78 +05:14:36.7 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:30:06.68 -15:28:33.2 14.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:36:38.65 +32:46:22.7 15.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:06:21.87 +15:20:45.6 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:34:54.43 +43:14:43.4 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:28:53.93 +49:23:55.6 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:34:31.96 -13:00:04.6 15.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:10:55.39 +18:56:07.3 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:14:49.51 +18:55:19.0 16.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:18:01.10 +00:16:28.2 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:36:24.86 +74:21:01.6 16.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:06:41.97 +46:11:28.5 17.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:11:27.11 +11:07:16.0 17.5mag A/2026 E1
22:24:21.78 -34:52:48.4 13.3mag 10P/Tempel
11:46:51.34 -05:19:15.9 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:04:35.99 -04:28:09.8 17.6mag 63P/Wild
00:45:43.70 -06:56:36.4 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
06:35:29.05 +19:23:55.2 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:17:05.28 +14:58:09.0 16.7mag 88P/Howell
05:31:42.78 +27:52:28.4 17.5mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
07:25:54.79 +25:18:37.9 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
10:23:28.78 +21:16:59.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:42:16.81 -20:38:53.3 17.4mag 124P/Mrkos
06:15:00.18 +20:41:54.4 15.9mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
02:39:16.40 -17:49:07.4 15.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:41:47.88 +15:04:34.6 12.0mag 169P/NEAT
03:22:41.60 +08:37:49.4 14.5mag 220P/McNaught
04:42:42.65 +35:41:40.5 15.2mag 260P/McNaught
08:26:33.20 +35:54:18.4 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:23:58.72 -00:01:37.8 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski
09:26:04.64 +16:57:04.9 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.0K Sep  5 03:24 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60  V8055  2026-08-30.22 10.89
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep  5 03:24 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep  5 03:24 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
23:44:28.070 -26:52:10.72  SN 2026ylk  2026-08-07.52 20.44
21:19:40.596 -20:14:18.67  AT 2026ylj  2026-08-07.43 20.61
15:18:13.061 +03:21:47.37  AT 2026yli  2026-08-07.28 21.08
20:52:51.054 -38:10:22.04  AT 2026ylh  2026-08-07.39 21.08
22:37:48.683 +14:31:17.67  AT 2026ylg  2026-08-07.38 20.64
15:22:10.313 +02:36:38.70  AT 2026ylf  2026-08-07.28 20.74
15:13:07.178 +04:34:04.44  AT 2026yle  2026-08-07.28 20.67
16:44:15.935 +15:58:23.98  AT 2026yld  2026-08-07.33 20.42
16:53:19.893 +23:20:52.77  AT 2026ylc  2026-08-07.34 20.62
21:51:46.429 +22:52:34.84  AT 2026ylb  2026-08-07.33 20.55
15:30:03.344 +01:16:22.04  AT 2026yla  2026-08-07.28 20.42
14:58:33.653 +00:08:16.26  AT 2026ykz  2026-08-07.28 20.51
20:30:15.393 +07:13:46.28  AT 2026yky  2026-08-09.29 19.6805
20:13:45.078 -03:03:56.96  AT 2026ykx  2026-08-09.28 19.8907
22:16:15.314 +06:41:29.30  AT 2026ykw  2026-08-09.38 19.6275
22:53:23.090 +37:27:07.60  AT 2026ykv  2026-08-09.12 19.5
15:44:17.610 +55:40:01.02  AT 2026yku  2026-08-06.74 20.54
16:47:10.500 +18:23:40.41  AT 2026ykt  2026-08-05.64 21.21
00:00:24.760 +31:45:39.85  AT 2026yks  2026-08-01.71 20.53
23:52:44.920 +32:12:02.01  AT 2026ykr  2026-07-22.75 21
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Sep  5 03:24 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Sat Sep  5 03:24:33 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 22s (0.37 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 7s (0.12 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 36s (0.60 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 5 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 8s (0.13 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 9s (0.15 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 7s (0.12 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 27s (0.45 min)
FIELD_Cet-09-Q2b1x1: 75s (1.25 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 77s (1.28 min)
Finished: Sat Sep  5 03:25:50 CDT 2026