This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.3236 2461288.8236 11.82 06:20:04.38 +25:05:53.5
187.12362 4.78745 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.8" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope 2 -1 2 12.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:20:04.38 +25:05:53.5: 15.44 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:04.38 +25:05:53.5: 15.43 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.17
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.8236,11.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.3236 11.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.3236 2461288.8236 12.27 06:00:33.47 +33:04:44.5
178.04674 4.85717 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.5" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J090.1335+33.0814 | 06:00:33.47 +33:04:44.5 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:00:33.47 +33:04:44.5: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:00:33.47 +33:04:44.5: 13.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J090.1335+33.0814,2461288.8236,12.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J090.1335+33.0814 20260905.3236 12.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.3236 2461288.8236 11.90 05:47:06.02 +32:51:25.4
176.81332 2.30753 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ZTF J054706.00+325125.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.673 g Y 0.769 g 2458571.51110 124.724498400000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:47:06.02 +32:51:25.4: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:47:06.02 +32:51:25.4: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J054706.00+325125.4,2461288.8236,11.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J054706.00+325125.4 20260905.3236 11.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.3236 2461288.8236 11.52 06:18:21.04 +26:46:22.9
185.45514 5.22606 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J061821+2646.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.179 Ic Y 0.190 Ic 2452825.40000 149.100000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:18:21.04 +26:46:22.9: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:21.04 +26:46:22.9: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J061821+2646.3,2461288.8236,11.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J061821+2646.3 20260905.3236 11.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.3236 2461288.8236 11.20 06:17:50.24 +31:16:21.3
181.39302 7.21434 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J061750.33+311622.2
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.650 V 13.090 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:17:50.24 +31:16:21.3: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:50.24 +31:16:21.3: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J061750.33+311622.2,2461288.8236,11.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J061750.33+311622.2 20260905.3236 11.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.3236 2461288.8236 11.32 05:51:04.17 +30:40:24.1
179.12166 1.90891 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J055104.17+304024.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.857 g Y 1.076 g 2458382.13590 249.646625500000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:51:04.17 +30:40:24.1: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:51:04.17 +30:40:24.1: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J055104.17+304024.0,2461288.8236,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J055104.17+304024.0 20260905.3236 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.3236 2461288.8236 10.97 06:04:11.19 +25:11:56.4
185.31311 1.67817 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J060411+2511.9
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.200 V 13.700 V 2454888.00000 127.500000000000 S:
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:04:11.19 +25:11:56.4: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:11.19 +25:11:56.4: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J060411+2511.9,2461288.8236,10.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J060411+2511.9 20260905.3236 10.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461288.82392399 05.09.2026 07:46:17.033 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25142
Objects passed selection criteria: 24938
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15066.5
Average stars matched: 14576.8 (96.7494 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 5 02:52:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461288.82392399 05.09.2026 07:46:17.033 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 148
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 38 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 192792
Objects passed selection criteria: 192058
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 118259
Average stars matched: 113228 (95.746 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 654236 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 5 02:54:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461288.82332550
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:48.549 +29:59:04.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:48.549 +29:59:04.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0450 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:50.174 +29:58:31.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:50.174 +29:58:31.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0433 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:48.549 +29:59:04.69
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:50.174 +29:58:31.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01081 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ofelZR3gCY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mhqvdLqvbV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G6lP2Lo83v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4fh0wWzcIC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec +24.3420 to +35.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec 24.3420 to 35.3116 deg
Loaded 17089 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12096 out of 13641 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13641 out of 27141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.8 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
2.8 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
12.4 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
12.5 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.4 (SNR ) 10.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.ofelZR3gCY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=0, passed=27193
Got 27193 stars (including 24022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4793 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4793 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1003 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.mhqvdLqvbV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=0, passed=27141
Got 27141 stars (including 23994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5277)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=1006 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1123 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.G6lP2Lo83v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=282, bad_region=0, passed=3112
Got 3112 stars (including 2827 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3112 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2754 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2753 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 2714 stars left (next iteration limit 2986)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2714 robust_rms=7.993 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.667 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2714 robust_rms=0.619 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.908 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2714 robust_rms=0.538 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.744 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2714 robust_rms_before=1.758 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.533 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.538 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.757 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.744
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.757 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits N_match=2714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.738 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.527 n_q1=571 n_q2=499 n_q3=1059 n_q4=585 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.406
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4fh0wWzcIC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=292, bad_region=0, passed=3164
Got 3164 stars (including 2871 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3164 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2759 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2759 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2800 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2757 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2757 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 2757 stars left (next iteration limit 3034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2757 robust_rms=7.960 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.050 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2757 robust_rms=0.586 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.999 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2757 robust_rms=0.523 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.724 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2757 robust_rms_before=1.653 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.538 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.523 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.771 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.724
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.771 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits N_match=2757 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.766 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.527 n_q1=586 n_q2=506 n_q3=1075 n_q4=590 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.480
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.454 worst_q_ratio=1.304
ref2=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.242
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits sigma_overall=0.525 worst_q_ratio=1.406
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits sigma_overall=0.518 worst_q_ratio=1.480
reference average sigma_overall=0.4535 worst_q_ratio=1.273
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4793 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4799 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214_astrometric_residuals.png (2714 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215_astrometric_residuals.png (2757 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:48.549 +29:59:04.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:48.549 +29:59:04.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0450 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:50.174 +29:58:31.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:50.174 +29:58:31.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0433 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:48.549 +29:59:04.69
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:50.174 +29:58:31.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01081 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F4JQZYJfJq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nsAArBJlJr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits &> /tmp/tmp.imCBll9cdh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vvuP6Xb8kB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.790850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.790850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 212641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec +24.3244 to +35.3140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec 24.3244 to 35.3140 deg
Loaded 17179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9281 out of 14295 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14295 out of 212641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 129 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.7 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
2.7 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.F4JQZYJfJq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=79, blended=32424, bad_region=1, passed=212748
Got 212748 stars (including 179989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=1028 n_q2=1362 n_q3=1243 n_q4=1133 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.313
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nsAArBJlJr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=32176, bad_region=4, passed=212590
Got 212590 stars (including 180083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1026 n_q2=1364 n_q3=1217 n_q4=1159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.imCBll9cdh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=14, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=961, bad_region=1, passed=24987
Got 24987 stars (including 23981 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24987 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4790 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=7.619 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.771 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.655 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.997 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.588 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.801 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4790 robust_rms_before=1.767 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.569 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.588 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.789 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.801
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.789 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits N_match=4790 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.674 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.774 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.517 n_q1=973 n_q2=827 n_q3=1999 n_q4=991 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.430
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vvuP6Xb8kB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=8, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=978, bad_region=1, passed=25174
Got 25174 stars (including 24152 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25174 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25174 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25174 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25174 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4786 stars left (next iteration limit 5264)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=7.536 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.744 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=0.630 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.097 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=0.569 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.766 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4786 robust_rms_before=1.657 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.573 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.569 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.787 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.766
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.787 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits N_match=4786 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.695 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.805 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.544 n_q1=986 n_q2=827 n_q3=1986 n_q4=987 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.452
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-45-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_024813_TTUQ1b1x1_2216519_jjfGDcVU/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:21.97 +32:31:06.6: 11.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:27:30.04 +29:01:22.1: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:27:21.34 +24:30:39.4: 9.48 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:28:04.24 +24:27:32.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:40.89 +24:34:41.2: 9.59 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:21.97 +32:31:06.6: 11.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:27:30.04 +29:01:22.1: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:21.97 +32:31:06.6: ref_mag=11.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4260 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:55.57 +25:25:30.4: 9.46 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:30.04 +29:01:22.1: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0268 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:43.75 +24:58:54.4: 9.58 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:41.22 +24:29:27.1: 9.46 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:54.61 +25:19:33.4: 9.81 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:21.34 +24:30:39.4: 9.48 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.48 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:04.24 +24:27:32.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:04.24 +24:27:32.9: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:21.34 +24:30:39.4: ref_mag=9.48 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0472 delta=-0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:10.36 +24:24:55.8: 10.17 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:40.89 +24:34:41.2: 9.58 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.59 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:40.89 +24:34:41.2: ref_mag=9.59 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1282 delta=-0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:55.57 +25:25:30.4: 9.47 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.47 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:55.57 +25:25:30.4: ref_mag=9.47 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2486 delta=-0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:41.22 +24:29:27.1: 9.46 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:43.75 +24:58:54.4: 9.59 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.46 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:41.22 +24:29:27.1: ref_mag=9.46 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3724 delta=-0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.58 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:54.61 +25:19:33.4: 9.83 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:43.75 +24:58:54.4: ref_mag=9.58 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3662 delta=-0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.82 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:54.61 +25:19:33.4: ref_mag=9.82 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3483 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:44.84 +25:12:02.7: 9.94 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:10.36 +24:24:55.8: 10.19 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:36.85 +25:44:14.6: 10.09 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.18 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:10.36 +24:24:55.8: ref_mag=10.18 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3583 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:28:32.18 +24:39:02.7: 10.32 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:44.84 +25:12:02.7: 9.94 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.94 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:44.84 +25:12:02.7: ref_mag=9.94 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5787 delta=-0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:36.85 +25:44:14.6: 10.10 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.10 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:36.85 +25:44:14.6: ref_mag=10.10 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4098 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:40.69 +24:56:47.5: 10.26 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:59.39 +25:39:31.7: 10.47 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:28:08.95 +24:36:21.5: 10.19 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:32.93 +25:07:22.7: 10.03 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:09.91 +24:49:53.6: 10.50 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:32.18 +24:39:02.7: 10.31 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.31 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:32.18 +24:39:02.7: ref_mag=10.31 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4985 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:43.72 +24:54:43.1: 10.13 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:13.87 +24:34:21.0: 10.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:40.69 +24:56:47.5: 10.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.25 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:40.69 +24:56:47.5: ref_mag=10.25 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7037 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:08.95 +24:36:21.5: 10.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:32.93 +25:07:22.7: 10.04 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.20 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.04 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:08.95 +24:36:21.5: ref_mag=10.20 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7309 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:32.93 +25:07:22.7: ref_mag=10.04 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7376 delta=-0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:59.39 +25:39:31.7: 10.50 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:09.91 +24:49:53.6: 10.50 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.49 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:59.39 +25:39:31.7: ref_mag=10.49 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7744 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.50 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:09.91 +24:49:53.6: ref_mag=10.50 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8229 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:43.72 +24:54:43.1: 10.14 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.13 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:43.72 +24:54:43.1: ref_mag=10.13 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7910 delta=-0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:13.87 +24:34:21.0: 10.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.23 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:23.58 +25:30:28.1: 10.48 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:13.87 +24:34:21.0: ref_mag=10.23 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8375 delta=-0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:11.44 +24:40:55.3: 10.42 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:17.95 +24:33:11.3: 10.17 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:11.44 +24:40:55.3: 10.43 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:23.58 +25:30:28.1: 10.50 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:28:29.22 +24:29:58.8: 10.52 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.43 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.49 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:11.44 +24:40:55.3: ref_mag=10.43 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8802 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:23.58 +25:30:28.1: ref_mag=10.49 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9315 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:28.58 +25:07:12.7: 10.83 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:59.56 +25:16:41.8: 11.06 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:17.95 +24:33:11.3: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.17 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:17.95 +24:33:11.3: ref_mag=10.17 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7947 delta=-0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:23.94 +32:33:20.2: 12.40 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:33:08.44 +25:31:06.9: 10.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:29.22 +24:29:58.8: 10.51 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.52 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:29.22 +24:29:58.8: ref_mag=10.52 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8511 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:02.44 +25:21:37.7: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:28.58 +25:07:12.7: 10.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.83 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:59.56 +25:16:41.8: 11.02 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:28.58 +25:07:12.7: ref_mag=10.83 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0671 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.04 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:59.56 +25:16:41.8: ref_mag=11.04 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0739 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:23.94 +32:33:20.2: 12.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:23.94 +32:33:20.2: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=11.9913 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:33:20.96 +26:02:22.8: 10.48 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:08.44 +25:31:06.9: 10.68 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.69 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:08.44 +25:31:06.9: ref_mag=10.69 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0865 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:27:17.72 +24:27:06.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:50.01 +24:48:10.4: 10.73 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:02.44 +25:21:37.7: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:02.44 +25:21:37.7: ref_mag=11.37 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1649 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:17.77 +25:48:40.5: 10.58 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:43.17 +25:17:16.1: 11.02 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:20.96 +26:02:22.8: 10.48 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.48 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:20.96 +26:02:22.8: ref_mag=10.48 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1022 delta=-0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:18.19 +24:56:36.9: 10.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:22.54 +25:27:45.2: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:17.72 +24:27:06.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:17.72 +24:27:06.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:50.01 +24:48:10.4: 10.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.74 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:50.01 +24:48:10.4: ref_mag=10.74 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3929 delta=-0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:17.77 +25:48:40.5: 10.58 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.58 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:17.77 +25:48:40.5: ref_mag=10.58 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2481 delta=-0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:43.17 +25:17:16.1: 11.03 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.03 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:43.17 +25:17:16.1: ref_mag=11.03 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4023 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:22.54 +25:27:45.2: 11.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:18.19 +24:56:36.9: 10.98 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:22.54 +25:27:45.2: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6310 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.97 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:18.19 +24:56:36.9: ref_mag=10.97 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5948 delta=-0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:20:04.38 +25:05:53.5: 15.44 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:04.38 +25:05:53.5: 15.43 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:20:04.38 +25:05:53.5: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=11.8221 delta=3.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:00:33.47 +33:04:44.5: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:28:32.70 +25:02:24.4: 11.09 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:00:33.47 +33:04:44.5: 13.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:00:33.47 +33:04:44.5: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2258 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:32.70 +25:02:24.4: 11.08 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.08 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:32.70 +25:02:24.4: ref_mag=11.08 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2629 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:47:06.02 +32:51:25.4: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:47:06.02 +32:51:25.4: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:47:06.02 +32:51:25.4: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9035 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:21.85 +25:54:53.2: 11.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:21.85 +25:54:53.2: 11.12 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.13 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:21.85 +25:54:53.2: ref_mag=11.13 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4850 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:34:17.17 +27:33:50.8: 10.68 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:31.49 +25:37:29.4: 10.72 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:18:21.04 +26:46:22.9: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:17:50.24 +31:16:21.3: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:34:17.17 +27:33:50.8: 10.66 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.67 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:34:17.17 +27:33:50.8: ref_mag=10.67 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7804 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:31.49 +25:37:29.4: 10.72 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.72 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:31.49 +25:37:29.4: ref_mag=10.72 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3215 delta=-0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:21.04 +26:46:22.9: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:18:21.04 +26:46:22.9: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5053 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:50.24 +31:16:21.3: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:17:50.24 +31:16:21.3: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1983 delta=1.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:51.88 +25:39:48.5: 10.87 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:51:04.17 +30:40:24.1: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:51.88 +25:39:48.5: 10.88 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.87 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:51.88 +25:39:48.5: ref_mag=10.87 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2564 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:25:24.58 +24:39:57.5: 10.44 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:51:04.17 +30:40:24.1: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:51:04.17 +30:40:24.1: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3114 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:26:50.15 +24:45:13.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:24.58 +24:39:57.5: 10.45 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.45 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:24.58 +24:39:57.5: ref_mag=10.45 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0403 delta=-0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:04:11.19 +25:11:56.4: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:26:50.15 +24:45:13.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:50.15 +24:45:13.6: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:11.19 +25:11:56.4: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:04:11.19 +25:11:56.4: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9560 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:55.33 +25:03:40.9: 10.68 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:55.33 +25:03:40.9: 10.68 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.68 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:55.33 +25:03:40.9: ref_mag=10.68 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8453 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:50.63 +24:52:18.5: 9.93 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:50.63 +24:52:18.5: 9.91 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.92 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:50.63 +24:52:18.5: ref_mag=9.92 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6107 delta=-0.69 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192897.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out209361.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out210515.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out41454.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out47375.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76582.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92068.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242160_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242160_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:08.57 +33:45:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242162_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242162_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242165_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242165_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242166_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242166_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.15 +32:30:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242167_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242167_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:19.78 +32:31:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242169_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242169_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:14.60 +32:34:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242170_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242170_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.00 +32:31:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242171_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242171_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:22.08 +32:33:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242197_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242197_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:51.61 +25:50:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242202_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242202_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242211_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242211_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:16.91 +24:40:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242221_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242221_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:51.13 +24:23:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242227_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242227_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:00.99 +24:30:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242240_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242240_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:20.86 +25:08:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242241_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242241_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:25.16 +24:50:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242263_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242263_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242275_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242275_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242285_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242285_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242291_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242291_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242318_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242318_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242319_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242319_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.32 +32:03:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242320_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242320_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242322_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242322_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242323_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242323_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242326_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242326_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242338_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242338_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242344_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242344_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.70 +28:29:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242346_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242346_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242348_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242348_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.48 +34:26:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242375_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242375_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242377_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242377_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242380_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242380_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242389_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242389_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242395_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242395_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242411_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242411_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242417_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242417_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242418_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242418_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242428_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242428_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242432_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242432_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242450_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242450_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242475_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242475_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242494_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242494_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:20.43 +35:01:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242499_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242499_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:17.69 +30:10:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242503_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242503_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:16.04 +32:35:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242509_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242509_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242513_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242513_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:09.88 +34:55:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242526_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242526_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:26.70 +26:58:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242531_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242531_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.60 +34:23:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242533_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242533_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242558_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242558_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242589_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242589_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242597_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242597_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242624_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242624_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242684_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242684_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242690_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242690_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242714_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242714_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:48.54 +31:10:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242716_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242716_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242718_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242718_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242722_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242722_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242724_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242724_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242726_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242726_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242729_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 242729_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116475_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 116475_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:22.26 +29:29:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:57.67 +31:24:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186034_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 186034_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:20.01 +26:31:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173004_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 173004_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:45.09 +25:51:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.18 +27:29:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153246_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 153246_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:00.94 +27:45:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66618_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 66618_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:31.61 +31:56:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:33.00 +29:09:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149793_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 149793_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:59.69 +27:55:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109928_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 109928_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:53.63 +29:42:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 145773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:51.67 +28:08:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44640_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 44640_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:02.00 +32:58:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:21.00 +28:36:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130731_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 130731_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:33.73 +28:48:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62099_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 62099_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:39.19 +31:50:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14794_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 14794_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:03.89 +34:25:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210515_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
Preparing report for the candidate 210515_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11759_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 11759_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:51.70 +34:35:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:40.02 +32:01:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.71 +29:51:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79766_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 79766_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:38.56 +31:03:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41454_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
Preparing report for the candidate 41454_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135068_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 135068_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:21.02 +28:36:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122716_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 122716_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:11.72 +29:02:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28544_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 28544_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:23.49 +33:45:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212442_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 212442_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:48.39 +30:50:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.08 +28:29:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71287_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 71287_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:22.86 +31:37:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47375_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
Preparing report for the candidate 47375_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:30.98 +31:25:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:00.39 +32:13:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 179530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:09.31 +25:59:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:28.44 +27:23:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180602_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 180602_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124884_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 124884_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:05.59 +28:56:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61548_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 61548_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:53.68 +32:06:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91853_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 91853_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:08.85 +30:22:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:56.70 +30:53:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148145_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 148145_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:12.71 +30:56:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178641_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 178641_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:52.78 +25:57:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174150_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 174150_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192897_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
Preparing report for the candidate 192897_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76582_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
Preparing report for the candidate 76582_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97622_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 97622_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:11.19 +30:08:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 145768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:54.30 +27:45:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51841_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 51841_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:08.29 +32:33:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189546_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 189546_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:47.18 +26:45:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92068_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
Preparing report for the candidate 92068_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175956_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 175956_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 109191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:52.98 +29:50:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203463_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 203463_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205712_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 205712_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209361_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
Preparing report for the candidate 209361_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.87 +25:25:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163250_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 163250_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.01 +31:35:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108247_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 108247_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:04.31 +29:55:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211142_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 211142_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55107_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 55107_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:09.15 +32:18:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170803_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 170803_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.67 +25:49:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13713_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215
The candidate 13713_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-46-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks
