This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4419 2461286.9419 9.55 06:55:07.03 -14:09:31.4
225.98636 -5.60586 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" GR CMa
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.800 V 12.000 V 2452163.80000 239.000000000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:55:07.03 -14:09:31.4: 10.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:55:07.03 -14:09:31.4: 10.45 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.46 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GR CMa,2461286.9419,9.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GR CMa 20260903.4419 9.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4419 2461286.9419 12.34 06:48:23.66 -08:14:29.7
219.93641 -4.41964 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS 15177370
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.027 g Y 0.417 g 2458474.88960 74.272886100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:48:23.66 -08:14:29.7: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:48:23.66 -08:14:29.7: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 15177370,2461286.9419,12.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 15177370 20260903.4419 12.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4419 2461286.9419 12.26 06:49:10.22 -12:57:29.0
224.25739 -6.36317 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0649103-125721
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.170 r Y 0.334 r 2458437.02770 90.182749300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:49:10.22 -12:57:29.0: 13.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:49:10.22 -12:57:29.0: 13.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0649103-125721,2461286.9419,12.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0649103-125721 20260903.4419 12.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4419 2461286.9419 11.37 07:20:05.53 -08:05:55.4
223.41035 2.61578 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.2" and 9.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" GDS_J0720058-080556
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.660 r Y 0.570 r
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:20:05.53 -08:05:55.4: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:20:05.53 -08:05:55.4: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GDS_J0720058-080556,2461286.9419,11.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GDS_J0720058-080556 20260903.4419 11.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4419 2461286.9419 12.53 06:47:49.25 -12:50:54.2
224.01133 -6.60893 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J064749.26-125055.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.350 V 14.290 V 2457387.00000 668.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:47:49.25 -12:50:54.2: 13.77 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:47:49.25 -12:50:54.2: 13.65 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J064749.26-125055.5,2461286.9419,12.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J064749.26-125055.5 20260903.4419 12.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4419 2461286.9419 11.48 07:15:15.62 -12:56:24.8
227.13900 -0.69400 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0715157-125618
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.703 R1 Y 0.388 R1 123.000000000000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:15:15.62 -12:56:24.8: 12.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:15:15.62 -12:56:24.8: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0715157-125618,2461286.9419,11.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0715157-125618 20260903.4419 11.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4419 2461286.9419 11.59 07:05:09.88 -13:53:43.8
226.85565 -3.31303 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J070510-1353.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.202 Ic Y 0.529 Ic 2454926.40000 967.000000000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:05:09.88 -13:53:43.8: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:05:09.88 -13:53:43.8: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J070510-1353.7,2461286.9419,11.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J070510-1353.7 20260903.4419 11.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4419 2461286.9419 11.19 07:07:23.34 -08:42:36.8
222.49465 -0.45114 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J070724-0842.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.777 Ic Y 0.532 Ic 2456546.20000 603.000000000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:07:23.34 -08:42:36.8: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:07:23.34 -08:42:36.8: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J070724-0842.5,2461286.9419,11.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J070724-0842.5 20260903.4419 11.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4419 2461286.9419 12.47 06:41:07.97 -13:21:08.2
223.74179 -8.29250 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0641080-132108
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.219 r Y 0.349 r 2458486.16280 158.727606500000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:41:07.97 -13:21:08.2: 13.66 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:41:07.97 -13:21:08.2: 13.74 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0641080-132108,2461286.9419,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0641080-132108 20260903.4419 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4419 2461286.9419 11.29 07:12:16.99 -09:03:09.8
223.35645 0.46318 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 9" NSVS J0712171-090314
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.576 g Y 3.823 g 2458391.86260 246.033337200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:12:16.99 -09:03:09.8: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:12:16.99 -09:03:09.8: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0712171-090314,2461286.9419,11.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0712171-090314 20260903.4419 11.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4419 2461286.9419 12.29 07:02:00.29 -05:27:58.4
218.99945 -0.14914 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" GDS_J0702003-052755
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.130 r Y 0.740 r 2458460.13060 102.852061300000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:02:00.29 -05:27:58.4: 13.51 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:02:00.29 -05:27:58.4: 13.46 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GDS_J0702003-052755,2461286.9419,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GDS_J0702003-052755 20260903.4419 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4419 2461286.9419 11.21 06:26:04.02 -14:20:59.7
223.04696 -12.02080 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V0354 CMa
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.300 V < 17.300 V 2452909.00000 246.200000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:26:04.02 -14:20:59.7: 14.39 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:26:04.02 -14:20:59.7: 14.43 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.13
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0354 CMa,2461286.9419,11.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0354 CMa 20260903.4419 11.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4419 2461286.9419 12.06 06:59:21.86 -14:15:19.7
226.53761 -4.72982 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS 15193523
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.500 R1 12.000 R1 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:59:21.86 -14:15:19.7: 13.36 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:59:21.86 -14:15:19.7: 13.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 15193523,2461286.9419,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 15193523 20260903.4419 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4419 2461286.9419 12.15 07:06:09.84 -07:18:23.9
221.10880 -0.07502 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" GDS_J0706097-071823
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.910 r Y 0.600 r 2458449.82760 77.539250700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:06:09.84 -07:18:23.9: 13.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:06:09.84 -07:18:23.9: 13.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GDS_J0706097-071823,2461286.9419,12.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GDS_J0706097-071823 20260903.4419 12.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4419 2461286.9419 9.08 07:20:47.46 -07:48:11.0
223.22972 2.90699 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V0685 Mon
Type: SRB:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.200 V 11.500 V 2452022.10000 94.600000000000 S
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:20:47.46 -07:48:11.0: 10.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:20:47.46 -07:48:11.0: 10.04 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.04 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0685 Mon,2461286.9419,9.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0685 Mon 20260903.4419 9.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4419 2461286.9419 12.17 06:57:47.18 -10:21:01.2
222.87164 -3.30645 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" GDS_J0657471-102059
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.860 r Y 0.840 r M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:57:47.18 -10:21:01.2: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:57:47.18 -10:21:01.2: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GDS_J0657471-102059,2461286.9419,12.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GDS_J0657471-102059 20260903.4419 12.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4419 2461286.9419 12.01 07:09:11.20 -13:26:04.4
226.89346 -2.23338 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.6" and 9.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0709114-132557
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.188 g Y 1.087 g 2458577.70280 307.632048500000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:09:11.20 -13:26:04.4: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:09:11.20 -13:26:04.4: 13.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0709114-132557,2461286.9419,12.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0709114-132557 20260903.4419 12.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.59921253 09.04.2026 02:22:41.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
First image: 2461139.59921253 09.04.2026 02:22:41.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Last image: 2461286.94223796 03.09.2026 10:36:39.360 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22323
Objects passed selection criteria: 22210
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14854.8
Average stars matched: 14396 (96.9118 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 248724 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 3 07:21:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.59921253 09.04.2026 02:22:41.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
First image: 2461139.59921253 09.04.2026 02:22:41.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Last image: 2461286.94223796 03.09.2026 10:36:39.360 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 134
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 36 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 149903
Objects passed selection criteria: 149385
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 102388
Average stars matched: 98275.5 (95.9834 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 614228 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 3 07:23:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461286.94156768
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:31.944 -09:59:40.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
Image size: 944.2'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:25.536 -10:00:12.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:31.944 -09:59:40.78
Second-epoch image center 06:51:25.536 -10:00:12.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0277 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Image size: 944.1'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:28.199 -09:59:31.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:31.944 -09:59:40.78
Second-epoch image center 06:51:28.199 -09:59:31.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0156 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:51:25.536 -10:00:12.11
Second-epoch second image center 06:51:28.199 -09:59:31.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01563 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v6BkVWfLRu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o2ZAbhOGeP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hjgZu3Vj07
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DYminru6xk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits and wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits and wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits and wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.8919 to 111.0361 deg, Dec -15.2871 to -4.5750 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.8919 to 111.0361 deg, Dec -15.2871 to -4.5750 deg
Loaded 21843 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14945 out of 16014 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16014 out of 23708 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.675200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.675200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.8919 to 111.0361 deg, Dec -15.2871 to -4.5750 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.8919 to 111.0361 deg, Dec -15.2871 to -4.5750 deg
Loaded 21843 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14945 out of 16014 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16014 out of 23708 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 23764 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.8842 to 111.0361 deg, Dec -15.2871 to -4.5672 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.8842 to 111.0361 deg, Dec -15.2871 to -4.5672 deg
Loaded 21874 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14942 out of 16020 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16020 out of 23764 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.5 pix Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
3.5 pix fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
3.6 pix fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
14.7 mag. Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.9 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.v6BkVWfLRu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2215, bad_region=0, passed=23708
Got 23708 stars (including 21478 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23708 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.697 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.720 n_q1=1581 n_q2=1059 n_q3=1271 n_q4=991 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.276
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.o2ZAbhOGeP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2234, bad_region=0, passed=23764
Got 23764 stars (including 21517 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23764 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.582 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.715 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.687 n_q1=1575 n_q2=1063 n_q3=1264 n_q4=994 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -region wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hjgZu3Vj07 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=283, bad_region=0, passed=6077
Got 6077 stars (including 5789 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6077 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013114 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010491 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6077 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6077 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6077 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=8.140 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.841 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.554 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.793 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.484 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.615 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4870 robust_rms_before=1.603 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.492 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.484 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.603 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.615
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.603 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=1111 n_q2=865 n_q3=1433 n_q4=1461 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DYminru6xk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=288, bad_region=0, passed=6240
Got 6240 stars (including 5947 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6240 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013113 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010490 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5354)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=8.134 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.907 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.565 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.737 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.509 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.687 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4870 robust_rms_before=1.462 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.498 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.509 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.584 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.687
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.584 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=1104 n_q2=875 n_q3=1434 n_q4=1457 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.273
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits sigma_overall=0.564 worst_q_ratio=1.276
ref2=Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits sigma_overall=0.582 worst_q_ratio=1.227
new1=fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits sigma_overall=0.481 worst_q_ratio=1.240
new2=fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits sigma_overall=0.487 worst_q_ratio=1.273
reference average sigma_overall=0.573 worst_q_ratio=1.2515
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023_astrometric_residuals.png (4902 matched stars from wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455_astrometric_residuals.png (4870 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456_astrometric_residuals.png (4870 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31542_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 31542_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:32.27 -05:16:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31543_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 31543_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:44.54 -04:57:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31704_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 31704_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:48.50 -07:55:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31712_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 31712_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:09.54 -10:17:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31723_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 31723_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:29.85 -08:57:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08402_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 08402_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:48.08 -07:54:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17675_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 17675_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:09.83 -12:25:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06096_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 06096_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:49.11 -06:53:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16235_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 16235_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:43.16 -11:33:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13267_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 13267_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:25.77 -09:57:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23403_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 23403_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:06.59 -14:02:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Mon-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:31.944 -09:59:40.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
Image size: 944.2'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:25.536 -10:00:12.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:31.944 -09:59:40.78
Second-epoch image center 06:51:25.536 -10:00:12.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0277 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Image size: 944.1'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:28.199 -09:59:31.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:31.944 -09:59:40.78
Second-epoch image center 06:51:28.199 -09:59:31.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0156 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:51:25.536 -10:00:12.11
Second-epoch second image center 06:51:28.199 -09:59:31.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01563 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pT8Aykis2w
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RJKRHMHOtj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WSLNFfyz4n
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i2TOUWXGNS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits and wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits and wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits and wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 163412 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.8860 to 111.0563 deg, Dec -15.2906 to -4.5674 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.8860 to 111.0563 deg, Dec -15.2906 to -4.5674 deg
Loaded 21923 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14198 out of 18773 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18773 out of 163412 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.507200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.507200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.77
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.77
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 163412 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.8860 to 111.0563 deg, Dec -15.2906 to -4.5674 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.8860 to 111.0563 deg, Dec -15.2906 to -4.5674 deg
Loaded 21923 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14198 out of 18773 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18773 out of 163412 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 164110 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.8842 to 111.0510 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.5672 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.8842 to 111.0510 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.5672 deg
Loaded 21912 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14201 out of 18779 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18779 out of 164110 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 122 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.3 pix Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
3.3 pix fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
3.3 pix fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
14.8 mag. Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.0 (SNR ) 12.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pT8Aykis2w (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=50, blended=21453, bad_region=1, passed=163362
Got 163362 stars (including 141685 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 163362 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.685 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.709 n_q1=1497 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1249 n_q4=1055 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.RJKRHMHOtj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=67, blended=21473, bad_region=0, passed=164043
Got 164043 stars (including 142348 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 164043 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.667 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.701 n_q1=1485 n_q2=1114 n_q3=1262 n_q4=1040 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -region wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WSLNFfyz4n (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1813, bad_region=0, passed=42200
Got 42200 stars (including 40333 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42200 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013114 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010491 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42200 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42200 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42200 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=8.167 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.936 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.558 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.747 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.486 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.608 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=1.618 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.481 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.486 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.589 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.608
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.589 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.503 n_q1=1104 n_q2=836 n_q3=1470 n_q4=1466 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.285
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.i2TOUWXGNS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1861, bad_region=0, passed=43154
Got 43154 stars (including 41229 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43154 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013113 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010490 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=8.440 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.877 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.564 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.710 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.507 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.669 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4877 robust_rms_before=1.465 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.496 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.507 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.574 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.669
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.574 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.610 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.503 n_q1=1113 n_q2=835 n_q3=1477 n_q4=1452 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.275
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-35-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0455.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_071621_TTUQ1b1x1_1597397_3TSDOtB4/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:35:01.44 -08:00:51.0: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:27:56.70 -05:30:30.2: 13.39 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:07:36.62 -05:37:38.0: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:23:04.88 -07:12:21.6: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:07:26.25 -05:12:30.8: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:31:44.98 -10:56:30.0: 12.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:21:57.11 -14:46:18.2: 10.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:05:50.30 -05:36:13.7: 12.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:27:56.70 -05:30:30.2: 13.59 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:35:01.44 -08:00:51.0: 13.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:07:26.25 -05:12:30.8: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:23:04.88 -07:12:21.6: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:07:36.62 -05:37:38.0: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:31:44.98 -10:56:30.0: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:56.70 -05:30:30.2: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2492 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:01.44 -08:00:51.0: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8947 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:26.25 -05:12:30.8: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1731 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:04.88 -07:12:21.6: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9501 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:36.62 -05:37:38.0: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9955 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:44.98 -10:56:30.0: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4207 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:21:57.11 -14:46:18.2: 10.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:05:50.30 -05:36:13.7: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.22 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:57.11 -14:46:18.2: ref_mag=10.22 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5621 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:50.30 -05:36:13.7: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9695 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:16:49.67 -09:44:28.8: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:52:20.15 -05:11:36.8: 12.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:12:04.69 -05:26:02.8: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:44:42.80 -09:23:36.2: 12.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:16:49.67 -09:44:28.8: 11.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:49.67 -09:44:28.8: ref_mag=11.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5547 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:22:57.50 -13:43:19.0: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:52:20.15 -05:11:36.8: 12.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:20.15 -05:11:36.8: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2705 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:12:04.69 -05:26:02.8: 12.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:04.69 -05:26:02.8: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9340 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:44:42.80 -09:23:36.2: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:42.80 -09:23:36.2: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5322 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:48:23.66 -08:14:29.7: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:55:07.03 -14:09:31.4: 10.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:22:57.50 -13:43:19.0: 12.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:57.50 -13:43:19.0: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3421 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:48:23.66 -08:14:29.7: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:48:23.66 -08:14:29.7: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3321 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:55:07.03 -14:09:31.4: 10.45 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.46 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:55:07.03 -14:09:31.4: ref_mag=10.46 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.5527 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:49:10.22 -12:57:29.0: 13.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:22:59.25 -05:54:11.6: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:49:10.22 -12:57:29.0: 13.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:49:10.22 -12:57:29.0: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.2590 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:22:59.25 -05:54:11.6: 12.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:59.25 -05:54:11.6: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4067 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:20:43.05 -11:34:36.4: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:20:05.53 -08:05:55.4: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:20:43.05 -11:34:36.4: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:20:43.05 -11:34:36.4: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2400 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:47:49.25 -12:50:54.2: 13.77 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:20:05.53 -08:05:55.4: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:20:05.53 -08:05:55.4: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3675 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:47:49.25 -12:50:54.2: 13.65 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:47:49.25 -12:50:54.2: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.5271 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:15:15.62 -12:56:24.8: 12.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:05:09.88 -13:53:43.8: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:15:15.62 -12:56:24.8: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:15:15.62 -12:56:24.8: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4854 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:05:09.88 -13:53:43.8: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:05:09.88 -13:53:43.8: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5879 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:07:23.34 -08:42:36.8: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:41:07.97 -13:21:08.2: 13.66 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:07:23.34 -08:42:36.8: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:07:23.34 -08:42:36.8: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1785 delta=1.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:41:07.97 -13:21:08.2: 13.74 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:41:07.97 -13:21:08.2: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.4783 delta=1.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:12:16.99 -09:03:09.8: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:12:16.99 -09:03:09.8: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:12:16.99 -09:03:09.8: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2935 delta=1.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:02:00.29 -05:27:58.4: 13.51 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:26:04.02 -14:20:59.7: 14.39 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:02:00.29 -05:27:58.4: 13.46 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:02:00.29 -05:27:58.4: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.2730 delta=1.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:26:04.02 -14:20:59.7: 14.43 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:26:04.02 -14:20:59.7: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=11.2176 delta=3.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:59:21.86 -14:15:19.7: 13.36 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:06:09.84 -07:18:23.9: 13.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:59:21.86 -14:15:19.7: 13.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:20:47.46 -07:48:11.0: 10.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:59:21.86 -14:15:19.7: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.0575 delta=1.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:20:58.32 -10:22:45.1: 9.58 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:06:09.84 -07:18:23.9: 13.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:06:09.84 -07:18:23.9: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.1133 delta=1.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:20:47.46 -07:48:11.0: 10.04 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.04 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:20:47.46 -07:48:11.0: ref_mag=10.04 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.0764 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:20:58.32 -10:22:45.1: 9.59 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.58 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:58.32 -10:22:45.1: ref_mag=9.58 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.8086 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:13:09.82 -05:21:09.5: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:57:47.18 -10:21:01.2: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:13:09.82 -05:21:09.5: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:09.82 -05:21:09.5: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9496 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:57:47.18 -10:21:01.2: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:57:47.18 -10:21:01.2: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1688 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:09:11.20 -13:26:04.4: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:09:11.20 -13:26:04.4: 13.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:09:11.20 -13:26:04.4: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.9895 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out121076.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out124188.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out127540.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130049.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out131934.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13596.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out144474.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159504.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160566.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out162324.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out46865.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57569.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out61150.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out62206.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70243.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76701.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94884.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187968_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 187968_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187969_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 187969_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187979_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 187979_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:40.23 -04:56:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187983_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 187983_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187984_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 187984_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187989_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 187989_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187991_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 187991_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187992_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 187992_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:26.62 -08:09:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187995_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 187995_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:03.20 -04:51:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187996_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 187996_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:47.01 -05:48:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187998_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 187998_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:26.33 -05:01:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188000_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188000_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188002_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188002_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188003_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188003_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:43.15 -05:15:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188004_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188004_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:14.01 -08:02:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188005_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188005_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:00.89 -06:51:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188006_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188006_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:26.12 -06:06:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188007_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188007_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:20.49 -09:01:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188008_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188008_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:39.56 -05:14:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188009_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188009_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:33.95 -13:50:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188011_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188011_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:59.45 -05:12:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188012_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188012_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:32.27 -05:16:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188041_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188041_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:38.29 -13:33:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188229_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188229_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:22.67 -12:39:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188294_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188294_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:33.34 -05:56:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188303_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188303_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:07.78 -05:33:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188510_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188510_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:27.43 -06:21:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188541_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188541_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:51.33 -07:48:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188669_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188669_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:41.08 -08:57:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188701_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188701_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:49.12 -08:18:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188720_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188720_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:11.48 -06:28:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188772_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188772_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:09.31 -05:33:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188862_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188862_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:03.01 -07:54:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188971_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188971_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:41.06 -05:13:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188998_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188998_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:11.22 -06:02:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188999_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 188999_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:20.28 -06:31:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189057_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 189057_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189080_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 189080_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:53.70 -09:27:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189100_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 189100_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:53.26 -05:36:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189103_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 189103_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189135_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 189135_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189170_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 189170_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.75 -10:39:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189287_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 189287_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:36.29 -13:31:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189375_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 189375_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162568_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 162568_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:16.88 -14:08:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118027_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 118027_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160662_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 160662_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.03 -14:16:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125996_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 125996_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:24.28 -13:12:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162324_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 162324_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61150_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 61150_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86577_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 86577_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:54.22 -09:45:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130049_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 130049_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103793_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 103793_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:06.33 -11:03:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56887_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 56887_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:45.91 -07:47:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18975_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 18975_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127120_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 127120_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:40.50 -13:07:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74210_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 74210_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:29.82 -08:57:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83638_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 83638_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:38.23 -09:40:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117460_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 117460_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:02.13 -13:47:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175827_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 175827_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:14.44 -06:11:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175682_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 175682_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100558_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 100558_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:58.03 -10:40:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62206_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 62206_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160131_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 160131_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:06.60 -14:17:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131934_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 131934_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83790_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 83790_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:15.43 -09:39:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111366_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 111366_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:52.97 -11:29:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127540_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 127540_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144474_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 144474_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92988_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 92988_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:09.58 -10:17:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101401_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 101401_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:49.44 -10:44:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102199_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 102199_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:00.69 -10:57:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70243_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 70243_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124188_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 124188_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76339_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 76339_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:15.70 -08:58:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76701_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 76701_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159356_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 159356_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:37.37 -14:22:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133637_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 133637_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:34.96 -12:33:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61295_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 61295_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:49.17 -08:03:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144376_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 144376_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:00.16 -13:56:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142564_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 142564_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:45.94 -12:09:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63194_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 63194_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:54.49 -08:18:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88158_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 88158_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:28.04 -09:46:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13596_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 13596_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105004_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 105004_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:58.16 -11:07:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159504_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 159504_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133219_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 133219_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:41.07 -12:45:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64833_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 64833_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:06.38 -08:19:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55387_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 55387_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:48.09 -07:54:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82150_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 82150_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.61 -09:25:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39505_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 39505_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:49.11 -06:53:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89187_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 89187_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:25.75 -09:57:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138845_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 138845_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:09.82 -12:25:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18283_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 18283_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:36.00 -05:42:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160566_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 160566_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119017_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 119017_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:45.17 -13:38:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115211_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 115211_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:40.78 -14:12:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153291_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 153291_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:23.16 -15:00:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46865_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 46865_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125106_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 125106_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:52.47 -13:13:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57569_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 57569_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125203_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 125203_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:49.38 -13:15:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96668_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 96668_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115335_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 115335_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:40.08 -14:20:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58385_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 58385_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:48.49 -07:55:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112306_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 112306_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:43.15 -11:33:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115268_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 115268_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:13.01 -14:25:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12748_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 12748_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33359_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 33359_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:41.70 -06:41:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94884_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 94884_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31528_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 31528_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:29.38 -06:25:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76022_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 76022_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:23.69 -09:07:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121076_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
Preparing report for the candidate 121076_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144060_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 144060_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:11.09 -12:02:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144664_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 144664_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:03.29 -11:55:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116186_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 116186_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:06.59 -14:02:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110160_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 110160_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:40.56 -11:17:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88130_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 88130_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:15.41 -09:56:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156069_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 156069_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:59.39 -14:47:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97442_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 97442_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:43.26 -10:35:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110460_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 110460_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:07.13 -11:15:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159138_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456
The candidate 159138_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-36-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0456 did not pass the final checks
